Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Lesson Plan Title: Creature Features Lesson Plan Topic: Heredity (life science)
State Standard(s): ❏ 3-LS3-1 Analyze and interpret data to provide evidence that plants and
animals have traits inherited from parents and that variate of these traits
exists in a group of similar organisms.
Objective(s): Students will apply concepts of inheritance by creating an offspring monster with
traits derived from two parent monsters. They should also be able to distinguish and
categorize physical traits as inherited or environmental (acquired).
Accommodations, ❏ ELLs/CLDs
Modifications and ❏ Provide time extensions
Differentiations for ❏ Provide sentence frames to guide academic language
❏ Increase hand gestures/signals
Diverse Learners:
❏ Pretend your hands are like a pan balance
❏ Speak slowly and clearly
❏ Use multimodal techniques (such as role-playing)
❏ Activate background knowledge; find connections between their
personal lives and the story
❏ Ask the students where they can find metric scales
❏ ADHD
❏ Pair written instructions with oral instructions
❏ Use a timer to help with transitioning from one activity/step to another
Homework N/A
Reflection: Strengths:
Probing questions
Creating a safe environment for learning and errors
Engagement (in the beginning and throughout the lesson)
Building personal connections (having them relate and apply the concepts in
their own lives)
Enforcing higher level activities and thinking
Weaknesses:
Giving clear expectations/directions
Forgetting to emphasize the importance of the objectives as a closure for the
lesson
Pacing
Reflection:
I believe this lesson would have went better if I thoroughly went through each
activity and clearly defined the directions and expectations of the activities
and discussions. Pacing could have been improved as well. However, I believe
that the engagement level was up to par because I was able to reel them by
using my family as an example and allow them to build those same
connections but with their own family. I thought this lesson was great because
it helped my students become keener to their physical features and the
patterns they possess with their family.
Video 4 Prompts
This lesson was designed based on the sole fact that they all share one thing in common: inheritance. I
incorporated a lot of personal connections within this lesson because my students, among any student really,
find content easier to understand and more meaningful if they are able to build those connections with it. My
students love learning about my mentor’s personal life and my life, so I drew them into this topic by showing
them pictures of my parents. Ultimately, however, they were able to relate to this science lesson, despite their
cultural and linguistic backgrounds. I have met all of their intermediate families and relatives, so it was not a
disheartening or sensitive subject for anyone. My students have also been learning about character traits (ELA
skill) throughout the year, so it was useful to help students differentiate between those traits and the physical
traits I was teaching them in this lesson (which, in turn, helped them develop a stronger understanding of the
concepts of inherited and environmental traits).
This lesson covers a life science concept that is supposed to be introduced in the third grade, according to Next
Generation Science Standards. On a greater scheme, I believe this lesson allowed students to improve their
skills of identifying patterns; personally, I believe this skill is evident in several ELA and math lessons, so to
have it introduced in a third-grade science concept is appropriate. With that being said, being able to seek some
correlation or pattern between two things is a previous skill that the students must have to be successful with
this lesson. Since they are also working with partners at some points of the lessons, students need to have
speaking and listening skills prior of. After they learn the objectives of this lesson, students should be able to
distinguish whether a particular physical trait of a human or an animal is inherited or caused by environmental
factors.
I provided a positive learning environment for all students by not responding to the wrong answers negatively,
but rather use it as a discussion starter; I used it to help students understand the concept more by probing my
questions based off their responses. I allowed students to have productive collaboration in both my
Engagement/Motivation segment and Developmental Activity segment. In the beginning of my lesson, I asked
students to discuss and agree on the physical traits I share with each of my parents. In my Developmental
Activity segment, I had pairs of students create an offspring creature together and agree on the classifications
they put on each trait (i.e. whether each trait was inherited or environmental). The ones who tended to be
disciplined the most were the ones who do not follow our speaking and listening expectations (i.e. calling out
without raising their hand, being distracted or disruptive while someone else was speaking). I disciplined these
students by not acknowledging their responses and calling on those who were following directions; I also publicly
praised them for following directions, as well.
4) Content:
a. What is the central focus/concept of this lesson and how did you support student learning?
b. How did you check for student understanding?
The central focus of this lesson was inheritance; in other words, this lesson introduced the concepts of physical
traits and how they are classified. I supported student learning by having them create their own offspring by
using the traits of two monster parents. I also supported their learning by allowing them to apply those concepts
with my family and theirs. I checked for student understanding by having them categorize different physical
traits throughout the lesson.
In the beginning of the lesson, I asked students to share out what I had in common with my parents. Realizing
that my students responses were not geared in the direction I wanted to head towards, I decided to word the
question differently. I believe that just this small action was an example of formative assessment because I had
their prior knowledge inform my discussion that was more adaptable to their needs. I also assessed them when
they were doing their first chart. I walked around and checked what inherited and environmental traits they
thought they possessed. Some students had their traits in the wrong column, so I asked them questions
individually, so they can work through and try to solve it themselves (Lemov Technique 35). I also looked at
their answers in the second chart to check their level of understanding; I checked whether they categorized each
monster trait correctly.
I modified my instruction in this lesson by putting more emphasis on vocabulary words. During an SBCT
meeting, I was taught that the ZOOM program always introduces and leaves time in their schedule to talk about
the vocabulary words present in their lesson. Given that information, I compared how I introduced vocabulary in
my lessons versus how ZOOM does it. In this lesson, I provided the vocabulary words both visually and
auditorily, so they could grasp onto them easily. Based on this specific video, I plan to modify my instruction by
giving more explicit directions and expectations for my developmental activities. I realized that I was not that
specific with my directions, which led to several students taking on the task in different ways; having no clear
directions resulted to my group of students not having a cohesive understanding of the concepts.