Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
net/publication/237775686
Article
CITATIONS READS
2 149
5 authors, including:
Tatsunori Matsumoto
Kanazawa University
83 PUBLICATIONS 720 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Tatsunori Matsumoto on 06 November 2015.
T. MATSUMOTO
Department of Civil Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi,
Kanazawa, Japan
matsumot@t.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
INTRODUCTION
It is important to design buildings with due consideration for their performance. In the
framework of performance-based design in Japan, foundations of a building are designed
considering settlements as well as the bearing capacity to support the weight of the
building. To perform such design, it is important to investigate the distribution of bearing
characteristics such as bearing capacity and stiffness of the bearing stratum below the
foundation, because the bearing characteristics may vary by location even in a narrow
construction area.
Foundations: Proceedings of the Second BGA International Conference on Foundations, ICOF2008. Brown M. J., Bransby M. F.,
Brennan A. J. and Knappett J. A. (Editors). IHS BRE Press, 2008. EP93, ISBN 978-1-84806-044-9. www.ihsbrepress.com
1798 Nemoto, Sakihama, Nakashima, Matsuzawa and Matsumoto
A 14-storey office building with a basement floor was constructed in Sendai, Japan,
in 2006. A diluvial gravel layer exists at the site to depths of 7 to 8 m underlain by a very
hard rock extending to depths more than 30 m. Hence, a raft foundation at a depth of 5 m
was adopted at the design stage to carry the weight of the building. The measured SPT
N-values at the depth of 5 m varied widely from 24 to 60. Therefore, it was necessary to
confirm the distribution of bearing capacities over the construction area.
It was thought to be useful to carry out many plate load tests to ascertain the
variation of the bearing stratum. However, it was difficult to carry out many static plate
load tests in the construction site, because of high cost and time. Therefore, rapid plate
load test using a Spring Hammer device (SH test, hereafter) were employed, because the
SH test does not need a reaction system and requires a short time for preparation and
testing1,2. Use of the SH test method allowed us to carry out many plate load tests (15
locations) in a short time period. In addition, conventional static plate load tests were
carried out at four locations on the site, in order to validate the SH test results.
In this paper, outline of the construction site including the building and the ground
conditions, the SH test method, and the results of the SH tests and the static plate load
tests are presented. It will be shown that the results from both test methods are
comparable, and that bearing capacities and coefficients of vertical subgrade reaction at
all the locations tested exceed the required values adopted in the design.
Figure 1 shows the plan and side views of the building foundation. The raft foundation
with a thickness of 2.0 m has an almost rectangular area, 40.7 m by 22.4 m. The building
is a base-isolated structure, where anti-seismic laminated rubber is intercalated between
the raft and the base of the building. Borehole investigations including measurements of
SPT N-values were carried out at three locations as indicated in the Figure 1.
Figure 2 shows the profiles of the soil layers and measured SPT N-values. A
diluvial gravel layer exists at the site to depths of 8 to 9 m from G.L. at Bor. A (Tokyo
Pail, T.P.+40.51 m) underlain by hard rocks to depths more than 30 m. The ground was
excavated to T.P.+33.94 m or T.P.+33.16 m, and the raft foundation was founded at that
lovel. The SPT N-values at the raft base level varies widely from 24 to 60 by location,
because the bearing stratum contains gravels and cobbles as shown in Figure 3. Therefore,
it was necessary to investigate the distribution of bearing characteristics at the raft base
level, in order to confirm the validity of the soil parameters adopted at the design stage.
The design maximum contact pressure at the foundation base was estimated at 300 kPa.
According to Japanese building codes, a bearing capacity greater than 900 kPa is needed,
adopting a safety factor of 3.
Allowable maximum settlement of the foundation was set at 30 mm, because this
value may not cause harmful cracks of the raft foundation. In order to satisfy this criterion,
it was estimated empirically that coefficient of the vertical subgrade reaction, kv,
estimated from the plate load test using a rigid circular plate having a diameter, D, of
0.3 m should exceed 220 MPa/m. This value was used to design the raft foundation.
Rapid plate load tests on bearing stratum of a building foundation 1799
Raft
Fig. 2: Profiles of soil layers and SPT N-values at the construction site.
1800 Nemoto, Sakihama, Nakashima, Matsuzawa and Matsumoto
Load cell
Acceleromete
Fig. 4: Loading and data acquisition system in the Fig. 5: Load cell and accelerometers set on the plate
SH rapid load test method.
Rapid plate load tests on bearing stratum of a building foundation 1801
Fig. 6: DSH-020 Spring Hammer test device for small plate (D=0.3 m).
Fig. 7: SH-070 Spring Hammer device for large plate (D=0.6 m).
Fig. 9: Correction of inertia to obtain soil Fig. 10: Non-linear damping interpretation.
resistance, Fsoi
Rapid plate load tests on bearing stratum of a building foundation 1803
At the following step i+2, C(i+2) is assumed to be equal to C(i+1). Therefore, the
values of Fw(i+2) and K(i+2) can be determined.
By repeating these procedures, the values of K and C for following steps are alternately
updated consecutively. Finally, the whole static load-displacement relationship, Fw vs w, is
constructed. Detail of this interpretation is mentioned in another paper in this proceeding1.
TEST DESCRIPTION
Figure 11 shows the locations of the plate load tests at the site. A total of 19 tests (15 SH
tests and 4 static plate load tests) were carried out as listed in Table 2. A plate having a
diameter, D, of 0.3 m was used at 13 locations, and a plate having D = 0.6 m was used at
the other locations. In the SH tests, DSH-020 device was used for testing the plate of
D = 0.3 m, whereas SH-070 device was used for testing the plate of D = 0.6 m.
Static plate load tests were carried out at 4 locations in the site. A rigid plate of
D = 0.3 m was tested at 3 locations while a plate of D = 0.6 m was tested at S4. Figure 12
shows a static plate load test using reaction beams. It took 2 days to perform each static
load test including preparation and testing periods.
Table 2. Test conditions of SH and static plate load tests, and brief test results.
TEST RESULTS
Rapid plate load tests
Figure 13 shows examples of dynamic signals measured in the first rapid load test on
Plate R3 having a diameter of 0.6 m. The loading duration was about 50 ms. Figure 14
shows the results of the non-linear damping interpretation. A total of 5 tests were
conducted on Plate R3, as shown in Figure 15. As mentioned before, the required value
of the vertical subgrade reaction, kv0, was 220 MPa/m and the allowable settlement of
the foundation was set at 30 mm. The value of kv0 was estimated from the first loading,
although that obtained from the following tests becomes larger. It is efficient to
suppress the contact pressure of the raft below the yield stress, py, in order to minimise
the foundation settlements. The yield stress, py, was defined as indicated in Figure 15.
The bearing resistance at w = 30 mm, kv0 and py are listed in Table 2.
Rapid plate load tests on bearing stratum of a building foundation 1805
400 200
Acceleration (m/s )
2
R3 blow 1 R3 blow 1
300
Force (kN)
100
200
0
100
-100
0
-200
0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200
Time (ms) Time (sec)
(a) Pile head force (b) Acceleration
1.0 10
Displacement (mm)
R3 blow 1 R3 blow 1
8
Velocity (m/s)
0.5
6
0.0 4
-0.5 2
0
-1.0
0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200
Time (sec) Time (sec)
(c) Velocity (d) Displacement
Fig. 13: Examples of measured test signals of Plate R3 (D=0.6m).
Stress (kPa) pstatic (kPa)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
0 py
0 kv0
Displacement (mm)
Displacement (mm)
1
10
5 h = 0.5 m
20 h = 1.0 m
h = 1.5 m
30 h = 2.0 m
D = 0.6 m prapid
10 h = 3.0 m
MH = 1.5 ton
h = 0.5 m
psoil 40
R3 blow 1 pstatic R3 D = 0.6m
15 50
Fig. 14: Example of derived load-displacement Fig. 15: Load-settlement relations of Plate R3.
curve of Plate R3.
Figures 16 to 18 are the corresponding results from the rapid load test on Plate R4 with
D = 0.3 m. The signals in the 4th test are shown. The yield stress from this test series is
comparable to that of Plate R3 with D = 0.6 m, not showing so-called ‘size-effects of plate
diameter’. In the rapid load tests on Plate R4, the final displacement of the plate was 9 mm
which was less than the allowable settlement of 30 mm. In cases where the final displacement
of the plate did not reach 30 mm, the stress at the final displacement is listed in Table 2.
120 800
Acceleration (m/s )
2
R4 blow 4 R4 blow 4
100
Force (kN)
80 400
60 0
40
20 -400
0
-800
50 0
100 150 50 0 100 150
Time (ms) Time (ms)
(a) Pile head force (b) Acceleration
1.5 6
Displacement (mm)
R4 blow 4 R4 blow 4
1.0 5
Velocity (m/s)
0.5 4
3
0.0
2
-0.5 1
-1.0 0
-1.5
0 50 100 150 50 100 0 150
Time (ms) Time (ms)
(c) Velocity (d) Displacement
2 h = 0.50 m
5 h = 0.75 m
h = 0.98 m
4
10
6 D = 0.3 m prapid
MH = 0.2 ton
psoil 15
8 h = 0.98 m
R4 blow 4 pstatic R4 D = 0.3m
10 20
Fig. 17: Example of derived load-displacement Fig. 18: Load-settlement relations of Plate R4.
curve of Plate R4.
Displacement (mm)
Displacement (mm)
10 10
20 20
RLT
30 Allowable settlement 30 D = 0.6m
D = 0.3m
40 S 1 (D=300mm) 40
S 2 (D=300mm)
SLT
50 50 D = 0.3m
S 3 (D=300mm)
D = 0.6m
S 4 (D=600mm)
60 60
Fig. 19: Results of static plate load tests. Fig. 20: Load-displacement relationship obtained
from rapid and static load tests.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
A number of plate load tests were carried out on a building construction site to estimate
variability of bearing characteristics of the bearing stratum for the raft foundation. Rapid plate
load tests using the SH device and static plate load tests were used. A non-linear damping
interpretation method was used to derive static response of the plate in rapid plate load test.
Variability of the bearing stratum obtained from the rapid load tests and the static load
tests were comparable. It was confirmed from all the tests that bearing capacities and
coefficients of vertical subgrade reaction at all the locations tested exceed the required values
adopted in the design stage. Construction of the building proceeded as designed after the tests.
Fifteen rapid load tests using the SH devices were done in 3 days, whereas it took
8 days to perform 4 static load tests. This fact encourages the use of the rapid plate load
test method on sites to reduce delay to construction works.
REFERENCES
5. Matsumoto T, Tsuzuki M and Michi Y. Comparative study of static loading test and
statnamic on a steel pipe pile driven in a soft rock. Proc. of 5th Int. conf. and
Exhibition on Piling and Deep Foundations, Bruges, Belgium, 1994, pp.5.3.1– 5.3.7.
6. Middendorp P, Bermingham P and Kuiper B. Stanamic loading testing of foundation
piles. Proc. of 3rd Int. Conf. on Application of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles, The
Hague, Netherlands, 1992, pp. 581–8.
7. Kusakabe O and Matsumoto T. Statnamic tests of Shonan test program with review of
signal interpretation. Proc. 1st Int. Statnamic Seminar, Vancouver, Canada, 1995, pp.
13–122.
8. Randolph M F and Deeks A J. Dynamic and static soil models for axial pile response.
Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Appl. of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles, The Hague, 1992, pp.
3–14.