Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
TIPOS DE
INESTABILIDADES
DISMINUYE LA BLOCOSIDAD
AUMENTA LA BLOCOSIDAD
INESTABILIDADES
CON TOTAL
CONTROL ESTRUCTURAL
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
PWedge
SWedge
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
SWEDGE:
FS = 1,004
PF = 45,4%
SWEDGE:
Proyección Estereográfica
SWEDGE:
Distribución de FS
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Ejemplo 13:
A = B = 0.80
FS = 1,12
Usando SWedge:
FS = 1,143
Goodman, R. (1989):
INTRODUCTION TO ROCK MECHANICS
J. Wiley & Sons
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Goodman, R. (1989):
INTRODUCTION TO ROCK MECHANICS
J. Wiley & Sons
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
Norrish, N. & Wyllie, D. (1996): Rock Slope Stability Analysis, Chp. 15,
LANSLIDES INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION, Special Report 247,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, USA
TO
N
IE
PLANOS
M
JA
N
PO
ES
TONELAJES LARGO BASAL
DESLIZAMIENTOS INESTABLES DEL DERRAME
DE CUÑAS ( W85% )
VOLCAMIENTOS
ANCHO
DE BERMA
Dominio II NO
NO
PLANAR SLIDE Dominio I
PLANAR SLIDE
DD 185°
DD 155°
Ld = 6 m.
Ld = 5.4 m.
Berma Minimo= 4 m.
NO Berma Minimo= 4m.
PLANAR SLIDE
DD 233°
DD 128°
NO
Ld = 6 m.
PLANAR SLIDE
Berma Minimo= 4 m.
NO
Ld = 5 m. DD 68°
PLANAR SLIDE
Berma Minimo= 4 m.
NO DD 278°
PLANAR SLIDE
Dominio III
DD 30°
NO
PLANAR SLIDE NO
Ld = 6 m.
PLANAR SLIDE
Berma Minimo= 4 m.
DD 320°
Dominio IV
DD 352°
Ejemplo 14.1:
PLAUSIBILIDAD DE DESLIZAMIENTOS PLANOS, PROYECTO ROSARIO
Cortesía: Grupo Ingeniería Geotécnica, Compañía Minera Doña Inés de Collahuasi S. C. M.
Dominio II
Dominio I
Ld = 4 m. Ld = 11 m.
Berma Minimo= 3m. Berma Minimo= 8m.
DD 185°
DD 155°
Ld = 5 m.
Berma Minimo= 4m.
Ld = 3 m. DD 233°
Berma Minimo= 2m.
DD 128° Ld = 6 m.
Berma Minimo= 4m.
Ld = 4 m.
NO
Ld = 5 m. Berma Minimo=3m. WEDGE NO
Berma Minimo=4m. WEDGE
DD 68°
NO
WEDGE
DD 278°
NO
Dominio III WEDGE
DD 30°
Ld = 5 m.
Berma Minimo= 3m.
NO
Ld = 5 m. WEDGE
Berma Minimo=4m.
DD 352°
DD 320°
Dominio IV
Ld = 6 m.
Berma Minimo= 5m.
Ejemplo 14.2:
PLAUSIBILIDAD DE DESLIZAMIENTOS DE CUÑAS, PROYECTO ROSARIO
Cortesía: Grupo Ingeniería Geotécnica, Compañía Minera Doña Inés de Collahuasi S. C. M.
Dominio II
Dominio I
DD 185°
DD 155°
NO
TOPPLING SLIDE
DD 233°
DD 128°
NO
TOPPLING SLIDE
DD 68°
NO
DD 278°
TOPPLING SLIDE
Dominio III
DD 30°
NO
TOPPLING SLIDE
DD 320°
Dominio IV
DD NO
352°
TOPPLING SLIDE
Ejemplo 14.3:
PLAUSIBILIDAD DE VOLCAMIENTOS, PROYECTO ROSARIO
Cortesía: Grupo Ingeniería Geotécnica, Compañía Minera Doña Inés de Collahuasi S. C. M.
II
io
in
Do
Ld = 4 m.
om
Ld = 11 m.
Berma Minimo= 3m. Berma Minimo= 8m.
m
D
Ld = 5 m.
in
Berma Minimo= 4m.
io
° DD 185°
55
I
1
DD
Ld = 5.4 m.
Berma Minimo= 4 m. Ld = 6 m.
Ld = 3 m.
8°
Berma Minimo= 4m.
DD
Berma Minimo= 2m. Ld = 6 m.
12
Berma Minimo= 4m.
23
D
3°
DD
68
III
Ld = 5 m. Ld = 4 m.
°
Ld = 6 m.
Berma Minimo=4m. Berma Minimo= 4 m. Berma Minimo=3m.
nio
mi
Do
DD 278°
Ld = 5 m.
Berma Minimo= 4 m.
DD
30
°
Do Ld = 5 m.
Ld = 6 m.
B Mi i 5
Ejemplo 14.4:
PLAUSIBILIDAD DE INESTABILIDADES CON CONTROL ESTRUCTURAL, PROYECTO ROSARIO
Cortesía: Grupo Ingeniería Geotécnica, Compañía Minera Doña Inés de Collahuasi S. C. M.