Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Domonoske, C. (2018). Judge says federal law against female genital mutilation violates U.S.
constitution. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2018/11/21/669945997/judge-says -
federal-law-against-female-genital-mutilation-violates-u-s-constituti
This article exposes the inability for American government to act upon female genital mutilation
happening in its own country. A Michigan doctor was being charged for the genital mutilation of
at least nine girls when they were only seven. Despite Congress having put forth legislation in
1996, there are still several states in which it is still legal. The judge claimed that they have no
ability to enforce the legislature, in fact, this is the first case to be brought under federal law to
go against FGM in America. The judge in the case claimed that it did not fall under
Congressional powers to enforce and regulate commerce, health services, or preventing gender
discrimination.
Guy, J. (2019). Woman jailed for 11 years for performing FGM on her 3-year-old daughter.
Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/08/uk/fgm-uk-sentencing-scli-intl-gbr/
index.html
This article was really interesting as it discussed some recent developments in enforcement of
laws prohibiting female genital mutilation in the United Kingdom. In February of 2019, a judge
sentenced a 37-year-old woman from Uganda to eleven years in jail, in addition to another two
for other charges, for performing FGM on her daughter, who is only three. This is the first
conviction for performing FGM in the UK. The courts called it a “barbaric practice” and that the
mother “betrayed her [daughter’s] trust in [her] as her protector.” A confusing part, however,
was that the woman’s husband was acquitted, but there is no explanation provided. This article is
from CNN and so it seems to be reputable, especially since it is so recent.
Koski, Alissa., & Heymann, Jody. (2017). Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of
female genital mutilation: A comparison of 22 countries. BMJ Global Health, 2(4).
Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5717946/
This was a write-up on a study that took data from twenty-two countries, twenty of the them
from Africa and the other two from the Middle East, as that is where female cutting is most
prevalent. As this was a longitudinal study, not only did it provide a representation of the overall
data, but it showed the trends which will prove to be very useful in this capstone. Since part of
the essential question is what it being done to prevent/ stop FGM, seeing the changes over time
could give a clue as to if anything is actually making a difference. When there is a sharp increase
or decrease, research can be done on the legislation being passed and any culture shifts that are
occurring in that country within the three years that that data point summarizes. From what can
be seen, there seems to be a stagnation in many countries, however, research on how to interpret
the data and graphs better would be beneficial.
Madsen, E. & Bietsch, K. (2017) Data in new wallchart show female genital mutilation/cutting
declining in many countries. Retrieved from https://www.prb.org/wallchart-female -
genital-mutilation-declining/
This article was a great source of statistics on the impact of new legislation and the impact that
education in countries which FGM is most prevalent has on the statistics of girls affected. The
statistics show that education and more urbanization aids in decreasing the number of girls
impacted. In some areas, it has even been shown to have decreased by 76%. Since it is an article
from PBS, it is reputable and the statistics seem credible and unbiased. The article also addressed
issues such as the fact that 95% of girls in Guinea and Somalia are still affected and that different
parts of countries will have varying levels of prevalence.
Moghe, S. (2017). 3 US women share the horrors of female genital mutilation. Retrieved from
https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/11/health/fgm-us-survivor-stories-trnd/index.html
This article really opens the readers eyes to the fact that female genital mutilation doesn’t simply
happen in third-world countries, but that it happens in the US. It happens to girls of all ages,
despite it being illegal in all states for girls under the age of eighteen. Despite two doctors being
charged for committing the crime on two seven year old girls. Additionally, it was interesting to
read the survivors stories and what their memories are surrounding the events, which are usually
not very vivid as they are so young and experiencing such a traumatic procedure. Finally,
another thing that had not been considered was the fact that this is not a race or religiously
separated issue as one of the victims was from a white, Protestant family. This is a credible
source as it is from CNN and it would be useful to do more research on the experiences of
women in order to be fully educated on what the impact of the procedure is.
Ritchie, M. (2016). This is what it's like to pee after female genital mutilation. Retrieved from
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-36101342
This article was by far the most difficult to read about because not only did it talk about statistics
and facts such as the others, or the vague reasoning and experiences the girls receive, it is from
the perspective of a woman who described the everyday pain and torture it inflicted on her. It
documented the immense struggle it was for her to be intimate, give birth, or even be confident
in her own body. Hibo Wardere, who is the victim of type III FGM, has three daughters and has
refused to put her daughters through the same pain she once went through despite her being
pressured by extended family. The pictures that are included, though slim, are extremely
effective and made a lasting impact on the reader. This is arguably the most moving and
emotional artifact so far.
UNFPA. (2018). Female genital mutilation (FGM) frequently asked questions. Retrieved from
https://www.unfpa.org/resources/female-genital-mutilation-fgm-frequently-asked-questions
This page full of frequently asked questions was similar to another annotated article, only it is a
little more in depth and, therefore, harder to read. Some of the statistics and reasonings they
provided were very disturbing. It broke the reasoning down into five categories: psychosexual,
sociological, hygiene/ aesthetic, religious, and socioeconomic. None of these reasons being
supported by fact, religious text, or a significant medical impact. This article also addressed
some of the counterargument questions that have been presented. Though the responses were
quick summaries, it started a logical argument against the protection of culture versus the
protection of individual girls. In general, it claims that culture is static and should not be able to
qualify any unprompted violence against.