Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
M 08
1
M.S.M. Aras, 2M.K.A. Rahim, 2A.Asrokin, 1M.Z.A. Abdul Aziz
1
University of Technical Malaysia Melaka
2
University of Technology Malaysia
shahrieel@utem.edu.my, mkamal@utm.my, ashaari@utm.my, zainol@utem.edu.my
Abstract — This paper describes a simple design on bandwidth and low production cost, and DRA are very
dielectric resonator antenna using disk shape. The promising for application in wireless communications.
dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) consists of high
dielectric constant materials, high quality factors and The advantages of the DRA are stated briefly as:
mounted on a grounded dielectric substrate of lower
permittivity. The selected dielectric disk is operating at ● Smaller circuit sizes and reduction of overall circuit
frequency of 2.4 GHz with dielectric constant of 34.73. costs with comparable performances.
The miscrostrip transmission line has been used as a ● DRA can be designed in any 3D shape as shown in
feeding line for the resonator. The simulation process Figure 1. Having more geometric parameters add
was done using Computer Simulation Technology more degrees of freedom to the design.
(CST) Microwave Studio and Microwave office. The
antenna has been fabricated on the FR-4 microstrip
board using the wet etching technique. The DRA is
operating at the frequency bands used for IEEE
802.11b/g Wireless LANs. The performance between
simulation and measurement give a very good
approximation result.
Figure 1: Basic geometrical shapes of dielectric
Keywords— Dielectric Resonator Antenna, Dielectric resonators.
Resonator, Transmission line feed, Microstrip line.
● The DRA is made up of high dielectric constant with
1. INTRODUCTION no conducting parts and has very small dissipation
loss. Therefore, it can handle high power. The
Dielectric Resonator Antenna (DRA) is fabricated from limitation might be caused by the excitation
low-loss and high relative dielectric constant material mechanisms.
of various shapes whose resonant frequencies are
functions of the size, shape and permittivity of the ● Its physical size is small since DRA is made of high
material. DRA can be in a few geometries including dielectric constant. Therefore, the DRA size
cylindrical, rectangular, spherical, half-split cylindrical, decreases as the dielectric constant increases.
disk, and hemispherical shaped. Richmyer proved the
fact that dielectric resonators radiate energy in 1939 ● DRA is not limited to linear polarization. The DRA
however practical application did not take place until can be designed for single, dual, or circular
the 1960's when suitable dielectric compounds became polarization.
available [1]. Dielectric resonators were first popular as
filter elements devices in microwave circuits with the DRAs offer several attractive features including:
first reported use as a radiating element not until the
early 1980's when the smaller size potential and higher ● High dielectric constant εr = 20 – 100
frequency applications boosted the research into the ● High radiation efficiency (≈ 95%) due to the absence
dielectric resonator antenna. The DRA has some of conductor or surface wave losses
interesting characteristics, like the small size, ease of ● Wide control over size and bandwidth
fabrication; high radiation efficiency, increased ● Tight εr tolerance: ± 1- 5%,
● High quality factor Q: up to 10000 (f = 10GHz)
c
λ = (2)
fr ε r
455
resonator. The loaded Q, , QL, takes into account all
The guided wave length has been calculated at causes of energy dissipation and is given by
frequency 2.4 GHz. The length is selected to ensure
that the dielectric resonator will resonate upon
excitation by a magnetic field. For simplification the 1 1 1
frequency that has been applied from the input will = + (4)
QL QU QE
resonate at the desired frequency. The length of
microstrip line obtained from the calculation is 3 mm
for the width and 28 mm for the length of the
microstrip line. 3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The optimum distance between DR and microstrip line
are determined by simulation and measurement. This is Figure 5 shows the comparison between simulation and
base on the trial and error approached. From the measurement result. It shows that the simulation and
experimental work, the best distance obtained between measurement give the comparable result. The return
DR and microstrip line is 4 mm as shown in Figure 4. loss for simulation is between -23 and -32 dB at
frequency 2.4149 GHz. The measurement result gives
the return loss of -19 dB at frequency 2.38 GHz. The
bandwidth for simulation and measurement is between
110 MHz and 140 MHz. The frequency has been from
measurement and simulation to the lower range of
frequency. This will be explained in the end of the
discussion.
456
H-plane. The HPBW for H-plane is 77.720 greater than
measurement, which are 720. The HPBW for E-plane is
46.610 for measurement and 450 for simulation
respectively.
Table 2 shows the simulation and measurement results 3.1 Adhesives for Dielectric Resonator
for return loss and bandwidth of DRA. The desired
frequency resonant is at 2.4 GHz and the tolerance is Adhesives will pull the DR frequency. It’s possible for
between ± 0.2%. The simulation, measurement and the frequency to go up or down, depending upon the
calculation using the formula given in equation (1) are mode, the adhesives’ dielectric constant, and how the
within the range of frequency resonant. A good antenna adhesive interacts with the E fields. The adhesive will
should indicate a return loss of less than -10 dB, which behave as a thin spacer, with bond line that must be
indicates that the antenna absorbs more than 90% of the process-controlled, between the resonator and the
fed power. The designated DRA is suitable for support. This space is filled with a dielectric constant
Wireless LAN IEEE 802.11b/g of Wireless LAN lower than the ceramic, and that effect must be verified
application since its bandwidth is within the range of experimentally.
the application.
3.2 Environment
3.3 Equipment
457
4. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
458