Sunteți pe pagina 1din 1

146 Geothermal Power Plants: Principles, Applications, Case Studies and Environmental Impact

Table 7.1 Results of optimization calculations.

P h1 h2 h1 2 h2 p/pci _ m
W= _ max

50 1200.4 985.0 215.4 0.1667 212.39


60 1200.4 973.5 226.9 0.2000 222.32
70 1200.4 964.0 236.4 0.2333 229.87
80 1200.4 956.0 244.4 0.2667 235.55
90 1200.4 949.5 250.9 0.3000 239.34
100 1200.4 942.0 258.4 0.3333 243.62
110 1200.4 936.0 264.4 0.3667 245.99
120 1200.4 930.8 269.6 0.4000 247.09
130 1200.4 926.0 274.4 0.4333 247.30
140 1200.4 922.0 278.4 0.4667 246.23
160 1200.4 913.6 286.8 0.5333 242.61
180 1200.4 906.8 293.6 0.6000 234.88
200 1200.4 900.0 300.4 0.6667 223.90
220 1200.4 895.0 305.4 0.7333 207.63
240 1200.4 890.6 309.8 0.8000 185.88
260 1200.4 885.0 315.4 0.8667 157.35
280 1200.4 881.2 319.2 0.9333 114.60
300 1200.4 877.0 323.4 1.0000 0.00

Fig. 7.15 Power output per maximum steam flow rate in the neighborhood of the optimum point.

It is also noteworthy that the curve is relatively flat near the optimum point.
Over the range of wellhead pressures from 118134 lbf/in2, the power output is
within 0.2% of the optimum value. This offers the designer a wide latitude of options
without sacrificing much in the way of power generation.

S-ar putea să vă placă și