Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PII: S2213-3437(14)00064-5
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2014.03.016
Please cite this article as: Jani Yahya, Hogland William, Waste glass in the production of cement and
concrete – A review, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (2014), doi:
10.1016/j.jece.2014.03.016
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our
customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
5 Corresponding author, Dr. Yahya Jani, dept. of Biology and Environmental Science, School
6 of Natural Science, Linnaeus University, Landgången 3, SE-391 82 Kalmar, Sweden.
RI
7 Tel. +46762220764 e-mail: yahya.jani@lnu.se
8
SC
9 Professor William Hogland, dept. of Biology and Environmental Science, School of Natural
10 Science, Linnaeus University, Landgången 3, SE-391 82 Kalmar, Sweden.
11 e-mail: william.hogland@lnu.se
U
N
A
12
M
13 Abstract
D
14 Cement and glass industries are facing a lot of challenges due to the high greenhouse gases emissions, the
15 intensive use of energy and the intensive use of the earth’s natural resources. The current situation of discarding
TE
16 waste glass to landfills is also not offering an environmental friendly management for the waste glass, due to the
17 non biodegradable form of the waste glass. However, the chemical composition and the pozzolanic properties of
EP
18 waste glass are encouraging for the use of this waste in the cement and concrete industries and to provide an
19 environmental friendly solution for the glass and cement industries. This paper review the different uses of waste
CC
20 glass in cement and concrete and the effect of the glass properties on the performance and durability of the
21 produce cement and concrete.
22
A
23 Keywords: waste glass, cement, concrete, glass aggregate, cement properties, waste
24 management.
25
26
27
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
28 1. Introduction
29 Glass waste is representing urgent environmental problems all over the world [1]. These
30 materials occupy huge parts of the landfills spaces, due to the non biodegradable nature of
31 glass, and causing serious environmental pollutions (air, water and soil pollutions). Also, the
PT
32 lack of spaces for new landfills is a problem facing the dense population cities in different
33 countries. The best solution to overcome over the environmental impact of these glass wastes
RI
34 is to reuse them. Recycling of these wastes will help to conserve the earth’s natural resources,
SC
35 minimizes the landfills spaces and saves energy and money [2]. The need of large quantities,
36 low quality requirements and the broad sites of construction make the construction industry
37
U
one of the most attractive ways to solve the environmental impact of the waste glass.
N
A
38
M
39 2. Glass
D
40 It is unclear exactly when, where, or how people first learned to make glass. The first
TE
41 manufactured glass was found in Mesopotamia about 3000 B.C. and the first glass vessels
EP
42 were made, about 1500 B.C., in Mesopotamia and Egypt [3,4]. In that time the glass industry
43 was slow and costly because of the small furnaces, the poor quality of the clay pots, and the
CC
44 heat was hardly sufficient for melting the raw materials. The invention of the blowpipe, in
A
45 about 30 B.C., made the glass production easier, faster, and cheaper and the glass became
46 available for common people for the first time in history [3,4]. The colorless glass first
47 appeared during the first A.D. century, through the introduction of manganese oxide [3,4]. In
48 1674, an English glassmaker George Ravenscroft patented a new type of glass through the use
49 of large amount of lead oxide in the raw material. This type of glass called lead glass. In 1688
50 a new process was developed for the production of plate glass in France. This development
51 helped in the production of the high quality mirrors. The French scientist Edouard Benedictus
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
52 invented the safe and the secure Triplex glass in 1910 using the lamination technique. Today,
53 90% of the flat plate is manufactured by the float process, which was developed by the Britain
55 Glass can be manufactured by melting a mixture of silica (silicon oxide), sodium carbonate,
56 dolomite (CaMg(CO3)2) and limestone (CaCO3) at a high temperature, up to 1600 oC. The
PT
57 mixture is then cooled to solidify without crystallization. The non liquid and non solid state
RI
58 makes glass to be an amorphous solid material. Special additives are used to give glasses their
SC
60
U
61 Different forms of glass are produced, depending on the chemical composition and the
62
N
additives used, such as: vitreous silica, alkali silicates, soda-lime glasses (containers, float,
A
63 sheet, light bulbs and tempered ovenware), borosilicate glasses (chemical apparatus,
M
64 pharmaceutical and tungsten sealing), lead glasses (color TV funnel, neon tubing, electronic
65 parts and optical dense flint), barium glasses (color TV panel and optical dense barium
D
TE
66 crown), and aluminosilicate glasses (combustion tubes, fiberglass and resistor substrates).
67 These glasses are manufactured in three different colors, mostly green, brown and colorless
EP
68 [8].
69
CC
70 The world total production of glass was about 89.4 million tons in 2007. EU countries
A
71 produced about 38.3 million tons in the same year, which represent approximately 30% of the
72 total world’s production, made EU the world’s largest glass producer in 2007. About 83% of
73 the EU glass production was container glass and flat glass, i.e. soda-lime glass [9]. It is
74 expected that the total production of glass will increase due to the increase in industrialization
75 and the improvement in the standard of living, i.e. the waste glass will increase too. As an
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
76 example, the total EU’s glass waste in 2002 was 3 million tons, while the total EU’s glass
78
79
PT
81 How much waste glass is found in the world? Statistically there is unclear information about
RI
82 the whole quantity of waste glass in the whole world, because of the lack of information from
83 different countries like the Middle East as an example. According to the United Nations
SC
84 estimation of solid waste, in 2004, there were 200 million tons of solid waste and 7% of that
U
85 waste was glass, i.e. 14 million tons of waste glass [11].
86
N
A
87 Glass industry is using a huge amount of the earth’s natural resources as raw materials. It was
M
88 estimated that each 1 kg of sheet glass consumed 1.73 kg of raw materials and 0.15 m3 of
D
89 water [12]. Also, it was found that the production of each ton of container glass consumed 1.2
TE
91
EP
92 In addition, glass industry is considered one of the most energy intensive industries, due to the
CC
93 need for a high temperature up to 1600 o C to melt the raw materials. It was estimated that
94 each 1 kg of glass sheet produced 16.9 MJ of waste heat [12]. While the production of each
A
95 ton of the European glass consumed 7.8 GJ of energy. The total energy consumption of the
96 European glass industry was 352 PJ in 2007, about 13-17% of the total industrial energy
98
99 On the other hand, the intensive use of energy is encountered with a high emission of CO2 and
100 other greenhouse gases. It was found, in 2007, that the production of each ton of the European
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
101 glass produced 0.57 ton of CO2 [9]. The melting step only can release 0.2 ton of CO2 for each
103
104 Practically, the cullet (which is the crushed waste glass that can be recycled) has been used
105 widely in the production of the container glass and the glass wool [9]. It has been found that
PT
106 increasing the use of the cult by 10% in the raw materials of glass reduced the energy
RI
107 consumption by 2-3% [9]. Also, using the cullet as a raw material in the production of glass
108 needs only for 40% of that energy used to produce glass from sand [14]. Theoretically, glass
SC
109 can be recycled completely and infinitely without losing any of its chemical and physical
U
110 properties. But, broken and mixed color waste glass makes the recycling process impractical
111
N
and high expensive because these materials can cause a variation in the chemical composition
A
112 of the recycled glass [15]. Impurities and contaminants that can be found in the waste glass
M
113 with the mixed color can affected the properties of the produced new glass [13,15].
114
D
TE
115 The recycling rate of waste glass is quietly low in the whole world and it is mainly
116 concentrated on the container and packaging sector [1]. In USA 11.5 million tons of waste
EP
117 glass generated in 2010 with a recycle rate of 27% only [16]. While, the total glass waste in
118 EU countries is estimated to be 4.1 million tons in 2008 with a recycle rate of about 60% [10].
CC
119 In Sweden 195, 000 tons of isolated color and 44,000 tons of mixed color waste glass were
A
120 generated in 2010 with a recycle rate of 93% for the isolated color waste glass, which was
121 used in the bottling and container glass [17]. Table (1) shows the amount of waste glass and
122 the recycling rate for different countries all over the world.
123
124 Table (1). The amount of waste glass and the percentage of recycling in different countries.
125
126
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
127 The waste management practice of the non recyclable waste glass is to discard it to landfills.
128 The deposition of this waste to landfills with its non biodegradable nature doesn’t offer any
129 friendly environmental solution. Therefore, waste glass is representing a challenge for the
130 solid waste management systems all over the world because of the low recycle rate, the lack
131 in the spaces of the landfills and the lack of the spaces for new landfills [18,19]. Construction
PT
132 industry, especially the cement and concrete industry, can provide a very important and useful
RI
133 solution for the environmental impact of glass waste, due to the chemical composition and the
134 physical properties of glass which are similar to that of sand and cement, as shown in table
SC
135 (2). The use of waste glass in the production of cement and concrete conserves the earth’s
U
136 natural resources, saves energy and money and reduce the emission of CO2 and other
139 Table 2. The chemical composition of cement and different colored glasses [41,59,68].
140
D
141
TE
142
EP
143
144
CC
145 3. Cement
A
146 Cement is the most important used material for all kinds of constructions and it is produced in
147 the whole world. The annual global cement production has reached to 2.8 billion tons and it is
148 expected to increase to more than 4 billion tons per year due to the major growth in different
149 countries like China, India, Middle East and Northern Africa [20,21].
150
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
151 Historically, sintered and ground lime or plaster was used as a cement material for the
152 constructions in the ancient time in Egypt, Mesopotamia and Greece. The most common type
153 of cement, the Portland cement, was first produced in England in 1824 by the British
154 bricklayer Joseph Aspdin. The produced Portland cement was an artificial hydraulic lime
155 similar in properties to the Roman cement, was patented by James Parker in 1796, and the
PT
156 British cement, was patented by James Frost in 1822. The first Portland cement in the modern
RI
157 sense was manufactured by William Aspdin in England in 1842. The German government
SC
159
U
160 The raw materials for the Portland cement production are: limestone (CaCO3), Silica (SiO2),
161
N
magnesium oxide (MgO), alumina (Al2O3) and ferrous oxide (Fe2O3). Theoretically, any
A
162 material which can have all these oxides can be used as a raw material for the production of
M
163 Portland cement. Two major methods have been used for the production of this cement the
165
166 In the wet process the raw materials are crushed to a particle sizes less than 20 mm and mixed
EP
167 accurately together to the desired ratio. Then, the mixture is made finer with the addition of
168 water to produce slurry with 35-40% water content. The slurry is mixed with the corrective
CC
169 materials to be homogenized and it is sent to a rotary kiln for clinker burning, in a temperature
A
170 up to 1500 o C. In the wet process a large amount of energy is consumed to evaporate the
172
173 In the dry process, the crushed raw materials are dried in a rotary drier and then mixed
174 accurately to the desired ratio. The mixture is further mixed to make the ingredients uniform
175 and sent to a rotary kiln for clinker burning, in a temperature up to 1500 oC.
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
176
177 The selection between the dry and the wet processes depends on the properties of the raw
178 materials, costs of fuel used, the location of the raw materials and other issues. The cost of the
179 plant construction in the wet process is low and high quality cement manufactured easily.
180 While, the dry process consumes less energy and the running cost is low. But, both processes
PT
181 are consuming a huge amount of energy because of the high energy needed in the burning
RI
182 clinker step.
183
SC
184 3.1 Cement industry challenges
U
185 A lot of challenges are facing the cement industry these days such as the increase in the cost
186
N
of fuels and energy, the necessities to reduce the huge amount of greenhouse gases emission
A
187 especially the CO2 emission and the high cost of the raw materials and the supply of theses
M
188 raw materials in sufficient quantities and qualities. These challenges are expected to increase
D
189 with the increase in the annual production of cement. Cement industry will face a regular
TE
190 pressure to find solutions for these challenges or at least to minimize the effect of these
192
CC
193 Cement industry is considered one of the most energy intensive industries due to the huge
194 amount of energy needed during the production steps and the high temperature used to burn
A
195 the clinker, up to 1500 oC. The energy cost of the cement production accounted for
196 approximately 40% of its variable total cost [23], 50-60% in some countries [24]. It has been
197 estimated that the cement industry consumes 5% of the total industrial energy consumption all
198 over the world in 2006 [25]. Recently, the energy consumption increased to 12-15% of the
199 total industrial energy consumption in the entire world and it is expected that the total energy
200 consumption will increase with increasing the total cement production rate [19,24,26].
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
201
202 In a modern cement plant, it was found that the average electrical energy consumption of each
203 ton of cement was about 110-149 kWh and the thermal energy consumption was about 4-6.2
204 GJ per ton of cement [24,26]. However, the average electrical energy consumption and the
205 thermal energy consumption for each ton of the European cement were found to be 111 kWh
PT
206 and 3.73 GJ respectively [23].
RI
207
208 The atmospheric CO2 concentration increased from 280 ppm at the start of the industrial
SC
209 revolution to 368 ppm at the start of this century [27]. The high increase in the CO2
U
210 concentration is believed to be responsible for the earth’s climatic changes and the global
211
N
warming [28]. One of the major industrial emitters of greenhouse gases, especially CO2, is the
A
212 cement industry. It was estimated that the production of each ton of clinker releases one ton of
M
213 CO2 [26,27]. And the cement industry accounted for about 7% of the total world’s CO2
214 emission [26]. Moreover, it was calculated that the European cement industry contributed by
D
TE
215 about 4.1% of the total CO2 emission in the EU in 2007 [23]. Szabo et al [25] concluded that
216 the global CO2 emission from cement industry will increase by more than 50% by 2030 due to
EP
218
CC
219 Bosoaga et al, [29] concluded that reducing the amount of the clinker in the blended cement
A
220 could be considered as one of the effective methods to reduce the CO2 emissions. Using waste
221 materials mixed with the ground clinker to produce cement could be able to reduce the CO2
223 replacement.
224
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
225 Also, it was found that the production of each ton of cement clinker consumes 1.5-1.7 tons of
226 the earth’s natural resources as raw materials, as an example the Chinese cement industry
227 consumes about 1.5 billion tons of limestone and clay annually [19]. Using waste material in
228 cement and concrete production can saves the earth’s natural resources, saves energy and
229 reduce the cost of the production of cement and the price of cement, reduces the greenhouse
PT
230 gases emission and reduce the environmental impact of the solid wastes, especially the waste
RI
231 glass because of the non biodegradable nature of glass materials.
232
SC
233 4. Waste glass in the production of cement and concrete
U
234 Different waste materials have been used in the production of cement and concrete such as:
N
235 blast furnace slag [30], clay [31], cathode ray tube waste [32], fly ash [33] and waste glass
A
236 [34]. But, large quantities of the solid waste that can be used in the manufacture of cement
M
237 and concrete are still discarded to landfills. Two billion tons of solid industrial waste, which
D
238 can be used in the manufacture of cement and concrete, was send to landfills in China in 2010
TE
239 [19].
240
EP
241 As shown in table (2), the chemical composition of different colors and crushed waste glass
CC
242 shows that glass has a large quantity of silicon and calcium and with the amorphous structure;
243 glass has the ability to be a pozzolanic or even a cementitious material. The non
A
244 biodegradable structure of glass makes the discarded of this waste to landfills a bad solution.
245 While the cement and concrete industry can provide an environmental friendly waste
247
248 Different studies have been made for the use of waste glass in cement and concrete industries.
249 Some of these studies used waste glass as an aggregate [35,36,37]; others used it as a cement
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
250 replacement [38,39,40] and some studies used it as aggregate and as a cement replacement in
253 Waste glass and natural sand have approximately the same physical properties, as shown in
PT
254 table (3). The comparison between the properties of waste glass and the properties of natural
RI
255 sand shows that the absorption rate of waste glass is lower than that of sand by 14%, i.e. this
256 means that concrete made up with glass as an aggregate has a lower absorption rate for water
SC
257 [42]. These properties make waste glass an interesting material to be used as an aggregate in
U
258 the production of concrete.
N
259 Table (3). Physical properties of waste glass and sand [42].
A
260
M
261
D
TE
262 During the 20th century different studies had been done for the use of crushed waste glass as
263 aggregate in the production of concrete [35,43,44,45,46]. Pike and Hubbard [35] studied the
EP
264 use of different forms of glass as aggregate (quartz, opal, fiber glass and glass) with cement.
CC
265 They found that the cement made up with these aggregates cracked due to the destructive
266 alkali-silica reaction (ASR). Johnston [46] studied the use of crushed glass as aggregate with a
A
267 maximum particle size of 19mm and with high and low alkalis cement content, 0.58 and 1.13
268 respectively. His results were in agreement with that of Pike and Hubbard [35] the alkali-
270
271 Because of the concern of the environmental impact of waste glass, a lot of studies have been
272 done recently for the use of waste glass as aggregate in concrete. These studies investigated
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
273 the properties of the waste glass aggregate and tried to find the optimum percentage of waste
274 glass that can be used as aggregate without any effect on the properties of the produced
275 concrete. It was found that the particle size of the waste glass aggregate is playing a vital role
277
PT
278 4.1.1 The effect of the particle size of the waste glass aggregate
RI
279 Takata et al [47] studied the effect of the particle size of the waste glass on the properties of
280 the produced cement. Bottles waste glass with the particle sizes of (4.75 mm to 0.15mm) was
SC
281 used with a different percentage as a partial replacement to the natural aggregate (0-100%).
U
282 The results showed that the expansion due to the ASR increased with increasing the particle
283
N
sizes of the waste glass aggregate. Moreover, the expansion due to the ASR increased as the
A
284 percentage of the waste glass increased. The optimum percentage of waste glass and particle
M
285 size aggregate that didn’t show any harmful effect of the ASR was 20% and less than 1.18
D
286 mm respectively. These results were in agreement with the results of Idir et al [49]. Idir et al
TE
287 [49] found that a particle sizes less than (0.9-1 mm) did not show any expansion due to the
288 ASR with a 20% of partial replacement of waste glass aggregate. With a lower particle sizes
EP
289 (mean diameter equal to 150µm) a higher percentage of waste glass aggregate can be used
CC
290 safely, up to 40%. Moreover, Corinaldesi et al [48] found that 70% of waste glass can be used
292
293 Reducing the particle sizes of the waste glass increases the pozzolanic properties and leads to
294 produce a cementitious material as a result for the pozzolanic reaction between fine waste
295 glass aggregate and cement. The cementitious material improves the strength of the cement
296 paste and a higher resistance for the expansive stresses of the ASR gel is produced [40,49].
297
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
298
299 4.1.2 The effect of waste glass aggregate on the mechanical properties of
300 concrete
301
PT
302 Concrete, as the main construction material, must have specific mechanical properties to
303 overcome the high stress of the weight of the construction loads. To specify the effect of the
RI
304 waste glass on the properties of concrete the compressive strength, the flexural strength and
SC
305 the tensile strength for the produced waste glass concrete were studied by different
307
U
N
308 The compressive strength was found to decrease as the percentage of the waste glass
A
309 increased [34]. The compressive strength decreased by 49% as the waste glass percentage
M
310 increased to 60% [11]. The poor shape of the coarse waste glass aggregate caused a decrease
D
311 in adhesive strength between the waste glass aggregate and the cement paste and produced a
TE
312 low compressive strength concrete [50]. However, Batayneh et al [51] results showed that the
313 compressive strength increased with increasing the percentage of waste glass aggregate up to
EP
314 20%. The same result was found by Ismail and Al-Hashmi [42], Mageswari and Vidivelli
CC
315 [52], Degirmenci et al [53] and Tan and Du [37]. But, Idir et al [49] found that the
316 compressive strength of concrete is also affected by the particle sizes of the used waste glass
A
317 aggregate, due to the increase in the pozzolanic properties. The experimental results showed
318 that the compressive strength increased as the size of the waste glass particles decreased. An
319 increase of 30-35 MPa in the compressive strength of the waste glass concrete was found with
321
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
322 Also, the experimental results from different studies showed that the flexural strength of
323 concrete decreased with increasing the percentage of the waste glass aggregate due to the
324 decrease in adhesive strength at the glass particle surface [11,37,50,53]. While, Batayneh et al
325 [51] and Mageswari and Vidivelli [52] results showed an increase in the flexural strength of
326 waste glass concrete with the increase of the fine waste glass aggregate up to 20%. They
PT
327 explained that the increase in the flexural strength was due to the surface texture and strength
RI
328 of the glass particles compared to that of sand.
329
SC
330 The tensile strength of the concrete made up from waste glass aggregate showed an increase
U
331 in the tensile strength with increasing waste glass aggregate up to 20% [51,52] and even up to
332
N
25% [37]. Increasing the waste glass further decreased the tensile strength of the waste glass
A
333 concrete [37]. However, Topcu and Canbaz [11] found that the tensile strength decreased as
M
334 the waste glass aggregate increased. The same results were found by Park et al [50].
335
D
TE
336 There is no clear information about the effect of waste glass aggregate and the particle size of
337 the waste glass on the mechanical properties of concrete. The published researches showed
EP
338 variations in the experimental results of the mechanical properties of the produced waste glass
339 concrete.
CC
340
A
341
343 The effect of temperature, from -20oC to 60oC, on the properties of concrete made up with
344 waste glass aggregate was studied by Poutos et al [54]. The waste glass concrete showed a
345 lower rise in temperature at 60oC and a lower reduction in temperature at -20oC compared
346 with concrete made from natural sand. The experimental results proved that concrete made up
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
347 with waste glass aggregate has greater temperature stability to both high and low temperatures
348 because glass has a lower specific heat compared to that of natural sand and because of the
350
351 Terro [55] studied the properties of waste glass aggregate at high temperature up to 800oC.
PT
352 Different percentages of waste glass aggregate were used to produce concrete, 0-100%. And,
RI
353 different particle sizes were studied (coarse, fine and coarse and fine mixture). The results
354 showed that the compressive strength decreased with increasing temperature up to 700oC-
SC
355 800oC and with increasing the percentage of waste glass over 10% for all the particle sizes.
U
356 This was because that glass is approaching to its melting threshold at 700oC -800oC.
357
N
However, concrete made up with 10% coarse waste glass aggregate showed a higher
A
358 compressive strength compared to normal concrete at ambient temperature and at higher
M
359 temperatures.
360 A summary for all the reviewed researches in this section are shown in table (4).
D
TE
361 Table (4). A summary for all the reviewed researches in section 4.1.
362
EP
364 The use of waste glass as a coarse and fine aggregate in the production of concrete was very
A
365 limited and didn’t show satisfactory results because of the alkali-silica destructive reaction
366 between the cement and the waste glass aggregate and also because of the low performance of
367 the produced concrete, i.e. low compressive, tensile and flexural strengths. The pozzolanic
368 properties of glass aroused the idea of using waste glass as a cementitious material or as a
369 partial replacement of cement in the production of concrete. The pozzolanic properties of
370 glass are highly affected by the particle sizes of glass [38]. However, in all the studies
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
371 concerning the pozzolanic properties of waste glass, nobody has succeeded to identify the
373
375 Shao et al [38] studied the effect of the particle size of the waste glass on the properties of
PT
376 cement and concrete using a 30% of waste glass as a partial replacement to cement in the
RI
377 concrete mixture. Fluorescent lamps waste glass (soda-lime) was used with different particle
378 sizes, 150 µm, 75 µm and 38 µm. The 150 µm did not consider as a pozzolanic material due
SC
379 to the coarse particle size, only the 38 µm satisfied the requirement to be a pozzolanic
U
380 material according to ASTM C618. The results showed that the compressive strength
381
N
increased as the particle sizes of the waste glass decreased. After 90 days of curing, the
A
382 compressive strength of the 38 µm waste glass concrete was higher than that of Portland
M
383 cement by 8%. The results of the ASR expansion test showed that the expansion of all the
D
384 particle sizes of the waste glass was less than that of concrete without glass. The experimental
TE
385 results proved that the ASR expansion decreased with decreasing the particle sizes of the
386 waste glass. Shao et al [38] concluded that using a 30% of waste glass with a particle size of
EP
388
389 Khmiri et al [39,56] investigated the effect of the particle sizes of the waste glass on the
A
390 pozzolanic properties of glass and on the properties of concrete at a constant partial
391 replacement of cement by 20% of waste glass. Four different particle sizes of container soda-
392 lime waste glass were used as a partial replacement for cement (less than 100 µm, less than 80
393 µm, less than 40 µm and less than 20 µm). The experimental results showed that the
394 compressive strength increased as the particles size of the waste glass decreased. The
395 compressive strength of the 20 µm waste glass concrete was higher than that concrete without
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
396 waste glass by 2% after 90 days of curing. The results proved that waste glass showed
397 pozzolanic properties when it grounded to less than 20 µm and the waste glass improved the
398 concrete properties when 20% of the 20 µm waste glass used as a partial replacement to
399 cement. These results were in agreement with that of Shi et al [57]. Also, Shi et al [57] results
400 showed that the ASR expansion reduced significantly with the use of 20% of fine grounded
PT
401 waste glass as a partial replacement to cement in the production of concrete.
RI
402
403
SC
404 4.2.2 The percentage of waste glass replacement
U
405 Different studies have been done to investigate the optimum percentage of waste glass that
406
N
can be used as a partial replacement to cement to produce concrete. Schwarz et al [58]
A
407 investigated the use of (5, 10 and 20%) of waste glass as a partial replacement to cement. The
M
408 glass waste powder used was slightly higher in particle size distribution than that of Portland
D
409 cement. The optimum percentage of waste glass was found to be 10% based on compressive
TE
410 strength test results. The experimental results showed that the compressive strength of the
411 waste glass concrete was less than that without waste glass. The ASR expansion test results
EP
412 showed that the ASR expansion decreased with increasing the percentage of waste glass
CC
413 powder because the pozzolanic reaction of the glass powder consumed the alkali hydroxide
414 concentration and the CH of the concrete mixture. The researchers concluded that 30%
A
415 replacement of cement by glass waste is required to reduce the ASR expansion below 0.1%.
416
417 Nassar and Soroushian [59] studied the use of different percentages (15, 20 and 23%) of
418 milled waste glass with an average particle size of 25 µm as a partial replacement for cement
419 in two filed study projects, a pavement section used as a sidewalk and maintenance vehicle
420 access route and a concrete driveway, sidewalk and curbs at the Michigan State University.
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
421 The compressive strength results showed that concrete with 15 and 20% waste glass
422 replacement showed a higher compressive strength compared to that concrete without waste
423 glass. While concrete with 23% waste glass replacement showed the same compressive
424 strength of that concrete without waste glass. The flexural strength results showed the same
425 behavior of that of the compressive strength. The experimental results showed that the
PT
426 abrasion resistance increased with increasing the percentage of waste glass and only the 23%
RI
427 of waste glass concrete gave the same results of concrete without waste glass. After 2 years of
428 tests, the concrete made up with waste glass showed a very good performance in the two field
SC
429 projects without any appearance of the harmful ASR expansion. The study found that the
U
430 optimum percentage of waste glass that can be used safely as a partial replacement to cement
431
N
was 20%. The experimental results of Nassar and Soroushian [59] were in contrast to that of
A
432 Schwarz et al [58], especially in the optimum percentage of waste glass.
M
433
434 Matos and Coutinho [20] investigated the use of different percentages of waste glass powder
D
TE
435 (10 and 20%) as a partial replacement to cement to produce concrete. The particle size
436 distributions of the waste glass powder and the used Portland cement were almost the same.
EP
437 The experimental results showed that the compressive strength decreased as the percentage of
438 the waste glass increased. And the strength activity index for the 10% concrete and the 20%
CC
439 concrete was 97% and 103% respectively compared to the concrete without waste glass. The
A
440 ASR expansion results showed that the expansion due to the ASR decreased with increasing
441 the percentage of waste glass despite the high alkali content. Also, the experimental results
442 proved that the waste glass improved the resistance of concrete to the chloride penetration
444 A summary for all the reviewed researches in this section are shown in table (5).
445
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
446 Table (5). A summary for all the reviewed researches in section 4.2.
447
448
449
450
PT
451
RI
452 4.3 Waste glass as a partial replacement for cement and aggregate in
SC
453 the same mixture
454 One of the most harmful phenomena in concrete is the alkali-silica reaction (ASR). It is a
455
U
chemical reaction that takes place between the aggregates reactive silica and the alkalis within
N
456 the cement paste. The alkali-silica gel is the result of this reaction and this gel has the ability
A
M
457 to absorb water and increases in volume. This increase in volume causes a high pressure
458 inside the cement paste and causing internal stress that can lead to a severe damage for
D
459 concrete. The ASR depends on the presence of high basic media (PH>12), high relative
TE
460 humidity, it increases with increasing temperature and it needs a long time to appear, up to
EP
462 Different materials have been used to mitigate the ASR like metakaolin [63], fly ash [58,64]
CC
463 and silica fume [1]. It has been also proved that milled waste glass, with a particle sizes less
A
464 than 75 µm, has the ability to suppress the ASR due to the pozzolanic properties of the milled
465 waste glass [65]. The ability of the milled waste glass to suppress the harmful effect of the
466 ASR encourages the researchers to try to use milled waste glass to hinder the ASR effect of
468
469
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
470 Shayan [41] and Shayan and Xu [66] studied the use of waste glass as a partial cement and
471 aggregate replacement in the same mixture to produce concrete. Table (6) shows the particle
472 size distribution of waste glass used. Coarse and fine waste glass was used as a partial
473 replacement for aggregate with a particle size range (0.15 mm-12 mm) while waste glass
474 powder was used as a partial cement replacement with a particle sizes less than 10 µm. The
PT
475 experimental results showed that the compressive strength of the waste glass concrete
RI
476 improved in comparison to that without glass. The ASR tests showed that increasing the glass
477 powder reduces the effect of the ASR due to the pozzolanic reaction. The results proved that
SC
478 30% replacement of cement with glass powder with 50% replacement of natural aggregate
U
479 with coarse and fine glass aggregate could be used safely without any effect on the properties
482 Table (6). The particle size of the used waste glass [41,66].
483
D
484
TE
485 The use of different colors container waste glass as a partial cement and concrete replacement
EP
486 was also studied [67]. Different percentages of waste glass were used as a partial replacement
487 for cement and natural aggregate and with different particle sizes, as shown in table (7). The
CC
488 performance of the produced concrete slabs mixtures (with the dimensions: 1.5×2.5×0.25 m)
A
489 was investigated in a field conditions. The experimental results after 404 days of tests showed
490 that waste glass powder concrete did not show any evidence of ASR effect with a percentage
491 of 30% as a cement replacement and 40-50% of glass aggregate. Moreover, the mechanical
492 properties of the produced waste glass concrete were higher than that of the 55 MPa concrete
494
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
495 Table (7). The particle sizes and percentages of waste glass [67].
496
497
498 Taha and Nounu [68] studied the properties of concrete made up from waste glass as a partial
499 replacement of aggregate and cement. Waste glass powder with an average particle size of (45
PT
500 µm) was used as a partial replacement for cement with 20% of replacement. Also, waste glass
501 was used as aggregate in the same mixture with an average particle size less than (5 mm) and
RI
502 with two percentages of replacement 50% and 100%. The results showed that the compressive
SC
503 strength decreased with increasing waste glass aggregate. The same results were also
U
505
N
A summary for all the reviewed researches are shown in table (8).
A
506
M
507 Table (8). A summary for all the reviewed researches in section 4.3.
508
D
510 Xie and Xi [69] and Chen et al [70] studied the use of waste glass as one of the raw materials
EP
511 to produce Portland cement. Due to the similar chemical composition between waste glass
CC
512 and clay the researchers tried to use waste glass as a partial replacement to clay [69] or instead
514
515 Xie and Xi [69] used waste glass as a partial replacement to clay (sandstone). The percentages
516 of the raw mixture used with the chemical analysis of the produced clinker are shown in table
517 (9). All the raw materials were grounded in a jar mill to a fineness less than 75 µm to produce
518 a homogenous mixture. The experimental results showed that the compressive strength of the
519 produced cement decreased with increasing the waste glass content in the cement raw
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
520 materials mixture. The X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the waste glass cement did not
521 produce any new minerals in the clinker and the researchers concluded that waste glass can be
522 used as a raw material for the production of cement but with small fractions, because of the
524
PT
525 Table (9). The raw material mixtures and the chemical composition of the produced clinkers
526 [69].
RI
527
SC
528 Chen et al [70] investigated the use of nine different colors bottling waste glass as one of the
529 raw materials for the production of Portland cement instead of clay. Two trial production
530
U
plants with different feeding rates, 1 t/h for 24 h and 1.77 t/h for 56 h, were used to study the
N
531 properties of the produced waste glass Portland cement. The waste glass was mixed with the
A
532 following feed raw materials: limestone (80%), flyash (9%), silica sand (9%), and iron slag
M
533 (2%). The experimental results showed that there were no significant changes in the NOx and
D
534 SO2 levels during the use of waste glass as a raw material and without it. The physical and the
TE
535 chemical properties of the produced waste glass cement were found to be the same to that of
536 Portland cement without waste glass, as shown in table (10). A little increase was noticed in
EP
537 the alkali content of the waste glass cement but the value was within the accepted range
CC
538 (0.4%).
539
A
540 Table (10). Properties of waste glass cement and normal Portland cement [70].
541
542
543
544
545
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
546 Conclusions
547 The non biodegradable nature of waste glass makes this waste a challenge for all the countries
548 all over the world due to the lack of spaces in landfills and the lack for spaces for new
549 landfills. However, glass and cement industries have huge challenges these days like: the
550 intensive use of the earth’s natural resources as raw materials, the intensive use of energy and
PT
551 the high emission of greenhouse gases which are responsible for the climatic changes. Using
RI
552 glass waste in the construction industry can offer an environmental friendly solution for this
SC
553 waste and reduces the problems encountered with the glass and cement industries too.
554 The reviewed studies showed that waste glass can be used in cement and concrete but the
555
U
particle size of the glass waste plays a vital role in the ASR destructive reaction and the
N
A
556 performance of concrete. The pozzolanic properties of glass increased with decreasing its
M
557 particle sizes under 100 µm. While, all the experimental results showed that increasing the
559 A full study is needed to find the optimum percentage of waste glass (as aggregate or cement
560 replacement) and particle size which can be used without any effect on the properties of the
EP
561 produced concrete. Also, there is a need to study the possibility of using the waste glass as a
CC
563
A
564 Acknowledgment
565 The authors would like to thank Linnaeus University for funding supports.
566
567
568 References
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
569 [1] Du H., Tan K.H., “Use of waste glass as sand in mortar: part II-Alkali-silica reaction and
570 mitigation methods”. Cement and Concrete Composites 35(2013)118-126.
571 [2] Hogland W., 2002. “Remediation of an old landfill site”. ESPR-Environ Sci and Pollut
572 Res 1:49-54.
573 [3] Klein Dan, Lloyd Ward, ed., 1984. “The History of Glass”. London: Orbis.
574 [4] Knittle R. M., 1927. “ Early American glass”. The Century Co., USA.
PT
575 [5] Heldman J.D., “Techniques of glass manipulation in scientific research”. Prentice-Hall,
576 Inc, New York, 1946.
RI
577 [6] Stanworth J.E., 1950. “Physical properties of glass”. The Clarendon press, Oxford.
578 [7] Koranyi D.E., 1963. “Surface properties of silicate glass”. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
SC
579 [8] McLellan G.W., Shand E.B., 1984. “Glass engineering handbook”. McGraw-Hill, Inc,
580 USA.
581
U
[9] Schmitz A., Kaminski J., Scalet B., Soria A., 2011. “Energy consumption and CO2
582
N
emissions of the European glass industry”. Energy policy 39:142-155.
A
583 [10] European Commission, “Environmental statistics and accounts in Europe”. Eurostat
M
585 [11] Topcu I., Canbaz M., 2004. “Properties of concrete containing waste glass”. Cement and
D
587 [12] Saito M., Shukuya M., 1996. “Energy and materials use in the production of insulating
588 glass windows”. Solar energy 58:247-252.
EP
589 [13] Ruth M., Dell’Anno P., 1997. “An industrial ecology of the US glass industry”.
590 Resources policy 23:109-124.
CC
591 [14] Isa, H., 2008. “The need for waste management in the glass industries: a review”.
592 Scientific research and essay 3:276-279.
593 [15] Federico L.M., Chidiac S.E., “Waste glass as a supplementary cementitious material in
A
594 concrete-critical review of treatment methods”. Cement and Concrete Composites 31(2009)
595 606-610.
596 [16] United State Environmental Protection Agency report, 2012.
597 http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/conserve/materials/glass.htm.
598 [17] Ambell C., Bjorklund A., Soderman M., “Potential för ökad materialåtervinning av
599 hushållsavfall och industrialavfall”. (swedish). KTH report. ISSN 1652-5442. (2010),
600 Stocholm.
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
601 [18] Pereira-de-Oliveira L.A. Castro-Gomes J.P., Santos M.S., 2012. “The potential
602 pozzolanic activity of glass and red-clay ceramic waste as cement mortars components”.
603 Construction and building materials 31:197-203.
604 [19] Zhang T., Gao P., Gao Pi., Wei P., Yu, Q., 2013. “Effectiveness of novel and traditional
605 methods to incorporate industrial wastes in cementitious materials-a review”. Resources,
606 conservation and recycling 74:134-143.
607 [20] Matos A., Coutinho J., 2012. “Durability of mortar using waste glass powder as cement
PT
608 replacement”. Construction and building materials 36:205-215.
609 [21] Schneider M., Romer M., Tschudin M., Bolio H., 2011. “Sustainable cement production-
RI
610 present and future”. Cement and concrete research 41:642-650.
611 [22] Francis A.J., “The cement industry 1796-1914: A history”. David and Charles, England,
SC
612 1977.
613 [23] Pardo M., Moya J., Mercier A., 2011. “ Prospective on the energy efficiency and CO2
614
U
emissions in the EU cement industry”. Energy 36:3244-3254.
615
N
[24] Madlool N.A., Saidur R., Hossain M.S., Rahim N.A., 2011. “A critical review on energy
A
616 use and savings in the cement industries”. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews
617 15:2042-2060.
M
618 [25] Szabo L., Hidalgo I., Ciscar J., Soria A., 2006. ”CO2 emission trading within the
619 European Union and Annex B countries: the cement industry case”. Energy policy 34:72-87.
D
620 [26] Ali M.B., Saidur R., Hossain M.S., “A review on emission analysis in cement
TE
622 [27] Rehan P., Nehdi M., 2005. “Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change: policy
EP
623 implications for the cement industry”. Environmental science and policy 8:105-114.
624 [28] Oreskes N. Conway E., 2010. “Merchants of doubt”. Bloomsbury press, New York.
CC
625 [29] Bosoaga A., Masek M., Oakey J., “CO2 capture technologies for cement industry”.
626 Energy Procedia 1(2009)133-140.
A
627 [30] Lee K.M., Lee H.K., Lee S.H., Kim G.Y., 2006. “Autogeneous shrinkage of concrete
628 containing granulated blast furnace slag”. Cement and concrete research 7:1279-1285.
629 [31] Farzadnia N., Ali A., Demirboga R., Anwar M., “Effect of halloysite nanoclay on
630 mechanical properties, thermal behavior and microstructure of cement mortars”. Cement and
631 Concrete Research 48(2013) 97-104.
632 [32] Lairaksa N., Moon A., Makul M., 2013. “Utilization of cathode ray tube waste:
633 encapsulation of PbO containing funnel glass in Portland cement clinker”. J. of environmental
634 management 117:180-186.
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
635 [33] Cong K., Sun P., “A novel polymer concrete made with recycled glass aggregate, fly ash
636 and metakaolin”. Construction and Building Materials 41(2013)146-151.
637 [34] Castro S., Brito J., “Evaluation of the durability of concrete made with crushed glass
638 aggregates”. J of Cleaner Production 41(2013)7-14.
639 [35] Pike R.G., Hubbard D., 1957. “Physicochemical studiesof the destructive alkali-
640 aggregate reaction in concrete”. J of research of the national bureau of standards 59(2):127-
641 132.
PT
642 [36] Ducman V., Mladenovic A., Suput J., “Lightweight aggregate based on waste glass and
643 its alkali-silica reactivity”. Cement and Concrete Research 32(2002) 223-226.
RI
644 [37] Tan K., Du H., 2013. ”Use of waste glass as sand in mortar”. Cement and concrete
645 composites 35:109-117.
SC
646 [38] Shao Y., Lefort T., Moras S., Rodriguez D., 2000. “Studies on concrete containing
647 ground waste glass”. Cement and concrete research 30:91-100.
648
U
[39] Khmiri A., Samet B., Chaabouni M., 2012. “A cross mixture design to optimize the
649
N
formulation of a ground waste glass blended cement”. Construction and building materials
A
650 28:680-686.
M
651 [40] Idir R., Cyr M., Tagnit-Hamou A., 2011 "Pozzolanic properties of fine and coarse color-
652 mixed glass cullet". Cem Concr Compos, 33:19-29.
D
653 [41] Shayan A., 2002. “Value-added utilization of waste glass in concrete”. IABSE
654 Symposium, Melbourne, pa.1-11.
TE
655 [42] Ismail Z., Al-Hashmi E., 2009. “Recycling of waste glass as a partial replacement for
656 fine aggregate in concrete”. waste management 29:655-659.
EP
657 [43] Pike R.G., Hubbard D., Newman E.S., 1960. “Binary silicate glasses in the study of
658 alkali-aggregate reaction”. High Res. Board Bull 275:39-44.
CC
659 [44] Scmidt A., Saia W.H.F., 1963. “Alkali-aggregate reaction tests on glass used for exposed
660 aggregate wall panel work”. ACI Mater J 60:1235-1236.
A
661 [45] Phillips J.C., Cahn D.S., Keller G.W., 1972. “Refuse glass aggregate in Portland
662 cement”. In: proceeding of the 5th mineral waste utilization symposium, Chicago, III: IIT
663 Research Institute, pa. 385-390.
664 [46] Johnston C.D., 1974. “Waste glass as coarse aggregate for concrete”. J Test Eval
665 2(5):344-350.
666 [47] Takata R., Sato S., Nonaka T., Ogata H., Hattori K., 2004. “Investigation on alkali-silica
667 reaction utilizing waste glass in concrete and suppression effect by natural zeolite”. 29th
668 Conference on our world in concrete and structures: 25-26 August, Singapore.
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
669 [48] Corinaldesi V., Gnappi G., Moriconi G., Montenero A., “Reuse of ground waste glass as
670 aggregate for mortars”. Waste Management 25(2005)197-201.
671 [49] Idir R., Cyr M., Hamou A., 2010. “Use of fine glass as ASR inhibitor in glass aggregate
672 mortars”. Construction and building materials 24:1309-1312.
673 [50] Park S., Lee B., Kim J., 2004. “Studies on mechanical properties of concrete containing
674 waste glass aggregate”. Cement and concrete research 34:2181-2189.
[51] Batayneh M., Marie I., Asi I., “Use of selected waste materials in concrete mixes”. Waste
PT
675
676 Management 27 (2007)1870-1876.
RI
677 [52] Mageswari M., Vidivelli B., 2010. “The use of sheet glass powder as fine aggregate
678 replacement in concrete”. The open civil engineering J 4:65-71.
SC
679 [53] Degirmenci N., Yilmaz A., Cakir O., “Utilization of waste glass as sand replacement in
680 cement mortar”. Indian J of Engineering and Materials Sciences 18(2011) 303-308.
U
681 [54] Poutos K. H., Alani A.M., Walden P.J., Sangha C.M, 2008. ”Relative temperature
682 changes within concrete made with recycled glass aggregate”. Construction and building
683 materials 22:557-565.
N
A
684 [55] Terro M., 2006. “Properties of concrete made with recycled crushed glass at elevated
M
686 [56] Khmiri A., Chaabouni M., Samet B., 2013. “Chemical behavior of ground waste glass
D
687 when used as partial cement replacement in mortars”. Construction and building materials
688 44:74-80.
TE
689 [57] Shi C., Wu Y., Riefler C., Wang H., 2005. “Characteristic and pozzolanic reactivity of
690 glass powder”. Cement and concrete research 35:987-993.
EP
691 [58] Schwarz N., Cam H., Neithalath N., 2008. “Influence of a fine glass powder on the
692 durability characteristics of concrete and its comparison to fly ash”. Cement and concrete
CC
694 [59] Nassar R., Soroushian P., 2012 “Strength and durability of recycled aggregate concrete
A
695 containing milled glass as partial replacement for cement”. Constr Build Mater 29:368-377.
696 [60] Diamond S., “A review of alkali-silica reaction and expansion mechanisms 1. Alkalies in
697 cements and concrete pore solutions”. Cement and Concrete Research 5(1975) 329-345.
698 [61] Shevchenko V. V., 2012. “ASR effect in glass used as additives to Portland cement”.
699 Glass physics and chemistry 38(5):466-471.
700 [62] Farshad, M. R., M. Hamed, E F. Gregor, 2010. "Investigating the Alkali-Silica Reaction
701 of Recycled Glass Aggregates in Concrete Materials." Journal of Materials in Civil
702 Engineering, 1201 – 1208.
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
703 [63] Panzera, T.H.; Borges, P.H.R.; Sabariz, A.L.R.; Cota, FP, 2013 "Recycled glass as
704 potential aggregate for concrete tiles: a statistical analysis of the physical and engineering
705 properties". International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 12:280-299.
706 [64] Carsana M., Frassoni M., Bertolini L., 2014. "Comparison of ground waste glass with
707 other supplementary cementitious materials". Cem Concr Compos, 33:39-45.
708 [65] Serpa D., Silva A., de Brito J., Pontes J., Soares D., 2013. “ASR of mortars containing
709 glass”. Construction and building materials 47:489-495.
PT
710 [66] Shayan A., Xu A., 2004. “Value-added utilization of waste glass in concrete”. Cement
711 and concrete research 34:81-89.
RI
712 [67] Shayan A., Xu A., 2006. “Performance of glass powder as a pozzolanic material in
713 concrete: A field trial on concrete slabs”. Cement and concrete research 36:457-468.
SC
714 [68] Taha B., Nounu G., 2008. “Properties of concrete contains mixed color waste recycled
715 glass as sand and cement replacement”. Construction and building materials 22:713-720.
716
U
[69] Xie Z., Xi Y., 2002. “Use of recycled glass as a raw material in the manufacture of
717 Portland cement”. Materials and structures 35:510-515.
N
A
718 [70] Chen G., Lee H., Young K., Yue P., Wong A., Tao T., Choi K., “Glass recycling in
M
720
D
721
TE
722
EP
723
724
CC
725
726
A
727
728
729
730
731
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
732 Tables
733 Table (1). The amount of waste glass and the percentage of recycling in different countries.
734 Table (2). The chemical composition of cement and different colored glasses.
736 Table (4). A summary for all the reviewed researches in section 4.1.
PT
737 Table (5). A summary for all the reviewed researches in section 4.2.
738 Table (6). The particle size of the used waste glass.
RI
739 Table (7). The particle sizes and percentages of waste glass.
SC
740 Table (8). A summary for all the reviewed researches in section 4.3.
741 Table (9). The raw material mixtures and the chemical composition of the produced clinkers.
742
U
Table (10). Properties of waste glass cement and normal Portland cement.
N
743
A
744
M
745
D
746
TE
747
748
EP
749
CC
750
751
A
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
759 Table (1). The amount of waste glass and the percentage of recycling in different countries.
Country Glass waste % of recycling Year Reference
tons rate
USA 11,500,000 27 2010 [16]
Canada 116,000 68 2009 [15]
Singapore 72,800 29 2010 [37]
Sweden 195,000 isolated 93 2010 [17]
PT
44,000 mixed 0
Portugal 493,000 25 2001 [18]
RI
Turkey 120,000 66 2004 [11]
Germany 3,200,000 94 2003 [11]
SC
Jordan 35 building 0 2004 [51]
glass
760
761
U
N
762 Table (2). The chemical composition of cement and different colored glasses [41,59,68].
A
Chemical Cement % Clear Brown Green Crushed Glass Sand
M
763
764
A
765 Table (3). Physical properties of waste glass and sand [42].
767
768
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
769 Table (4). A summary for all the reviewed researches in section 4.1.
PT
glass) change
Bottles ( 0-100 4.75- 20 Less than (ASTM [47]
soda-lime 0.15mm 1.18 mm C1260)*
RI
glass)
Bottles ( 0-60 4-16 mm 23 Less than 4 (ASTM [11]
soda-lime mm C1260)*
SC
glass)
Bottles ( 0-70 Less than 5 Less than 30 Less than 5 (ASTM [50]
soda-lime mm mm C1260)*
glass)
U
Container ( 0-70 36-100 µm 70 75 µm Mortar bar [48]
soda-lime N length
glass) change
Bottles ( 0-100 Fine (less 10 Fine, coarse Not [55]
A
soda-lime than 4.75 and fine and studied
glass) mm), coarse coarse
(higher than
M
lime)
Cullet glass 0-100 0.15-9.5 mm Not Not Not [54]
(soda-lime) mentioned mentioned studied
Container 0-20 0.15-4.75 20 0.15-4.75 mm (ASTM [42]
EP
771
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
772 Table (5). A summary for all the reviewed researches in section 4.2.
PT
Window 0-20 1-100 µm 10 1-100 µm (ASTM [58]
plate glass C1260)*
(soda-lime)
RI
Bottles ( 0-23 13-25 µm 20 13-25µm (ASTM [59]
soda-lime C1260)*
glass)
SC
Container 20 20-100 µm 20 20 µm Not [39,56]
(soda-lime studied
glass)
Recycled 0-20 0.1-100 µm 20 0.1-100 µm (ASTM [20]
U
waste glass C1567)**
(soda-lime) N
773 *mortar bar change in length method
A
774 **accelerated mortar bar test method
M
775
776 Table (6). The particle size of the used waste glass [41,66].
D
778 Table (7). The particle sizes and percentages of waste glass [67].
Particle size range
CC
780
781
782
783
784
32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
785 Table (8). A summary for all the reviewed researches in section 4.3.
PT
glass (soda- cement table 5 50 for table 5 C1260)*
lime) 0-75 for aggregate
aggregate
RI
Recycled 20 for cement Average 45 Not Not Not [68]
glass 50 and 100 µm for mentioned mentioned studied
for aggregate cement
SC
Less than 5
mm for
aggregate
786
U
N
788
A
789 Table (9). The raw material mixtures and the chemical composition of the produced clinkers
M
790 [69].
Weight ratios of raw materials Calculated oxide composition of clinkers (%)
D
Mix Clay Iron Low grade Lime Waste SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO SO3 Na2O K2O Sum
no. (sandst ore lime stone stone glass
one)
TE
1 6.2 2 63.29 77.14 0 20.80 5.19 3.83 63.21 0.96 0.50 0.03 0.98 95.50
2 3 2 62.53 76.68 4 20.77 5.17 3.89 63.06 0.97 0.48 0.44 0.96 95.74
3 0 2 63.29 74.36 7 20.35 5.18 3.94 62.47 0.98 0.47 0.78 1.00 95.17
4 0 2 52.74 82.11 10 21.13 4.77 3.91 62.50 0.95 0.46 1.12 0.92 95.76
EP
791
792
CC
793 Table (10). Properties of waste glass cement and normal Portland cement [70].
Normal Portland cement Waste glass cement
Na2O (%) 0.10 0.20
A
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
796
PT
RI
SC
U
N
A
M
D
TE
EP
CC
A
34