Amendment to IRC:112-2011

Amendment No. 1/ IRC:112-2011 / January 2014

To
IRC:112-2011 “Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges”

S. No Clause No. & For Read

Page No.

1 3.2.2 fpk characteristic tensile strength of fpk characteristic tensile strength of

prestressing steel prestressing steel which is same as fp
(Page 12)
corresponding to breaking load given in the
relevant IS codes listed in Table 18.2

2 6.2.2 Note: (2) Value of εuk shall be taken from the Value of εuk shall be taken as the uniform
Fig.6.2 standard governing the manufacture of elongation given in the standard governing
reinforcement. the manufacture of reinforcement.

3
(Page 30)

10.4.4
(Page 103)
C
The design punching shear resistance The design punching shear resistance shall
(MPa) of slab may be calculated as be assessed at the basic control perimeter,
follows: according to Clause 10.4.2. The design
punching shear resistance (MPa) of slab may
be calculated as follows:
IR
4 15.3.1.2 The minimum cover for post tensioned The minimum cover for post tensioned ducts
ducts shall not be less than maximum shall not be less than 75 mm. Local reduction
(Page 163)
of the outer diameter of ducts or in cover at externally jointed locations of
75 mm. ducts is acceptable.
(local reduction in spacing at
externally jointed locations of ducts is
acceptable).

5 16.9 (1) Deep beams can be designed using Deep beams (span/depth ratio less than 3)
appropriate elastic models or by plastic can be designed using appropriate elastic
(Page 186)
methods. models or by plastic methods.

INDIAN HIGHWAYS, February 2014 107

 Errata to IRC:112-2011

Errata No. 1/IRC:112-2011/January 2014

To
IRC112-2011 “Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges”

S No. Clause No. & For Read

Page No.

1. 10.3.4 VEdi ≤ VRdi vEdi ≤ vRdi

(Page 95) VEdi is the interface shear stress vEdi is the interface shear stress
VRdi is the resisting capacity at section vRdi is the resisting capacity at section
VEdi = β VEd /zbi vEdi = β vEd /zbi

2. 13.5 Requirements given in this Clause are in Requirements given in this Clause are in
(Page 136) addition to those given in Clause 16.11 addition to those given in Clause 16.14

3. 15.2.6.1 (4) When large bars are used, adequate crack When large bars are used, adequate crack

4.
(Page 159)

15.11
(Page 166)
12.
C
control shall be ensured either by using
surface reinforcement as per Clause
16.2.4.2, or by calculation as per Section
control shall be ensured either by using
surface reinforcement as per Clause
16.5.4 (4), or by calculation as per
Section 12.

fctd (t) is the design tensile strength at time fctd (t) is the design tensile strength at time
of release ‘t’ (Refer Clause 6.4.3.3) taken of release ‘t’ (Refer Clause 6.4.2.3) taken
as 0.7 ftm (t)/γc as 0.7 fctm (t)/γc
IR
5. 16.7.1 (3)
(Page 185) ac < 0.5 hc ac ≤ 0.5 hc

16.7.1 (4)
(Page 185) In corbels with ac > hc In corbels with ac > 0.5 hc

16.7.1 (4) As.stirrup ≥ 0.5 fcd/fyd As.stirrup ≥ 0.5 FEd /fyd

(Page 185)
Eq. 16.12

6. Annexure A2 1. Fig A2-4 Rectangular Tensile 1. Fig A2-4 Rectangular Stress

Clause A2.9 Strength Distribution
Figure A2-4 2. nfcd 2. η fcd
(Page 243)

7. Clause 16.7.1 Figure shown below Corrected Figure shown below

(Page 186)

108 INDIAN HIGHWAYS, February 2014

 Errata No. 1/IRC:112-2011/January 2014

As existing in the code

ac ac ac

Note : Provide chamfer to avoid re-entrant corners in 16.7a) and 16.7 b)

As Amended:

C Fig. 16.7 Reinforcement of a Corbel

IR
Note : Provide chamfer to avoid re-entrant corners in 16.7a), 16.7 b) and 16.7 c).
Fig. 16.7 Reinforcement of a Corbel

INDIAN HIGHWAYS, February 2014 109