Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Pingol
10 -Garcia
DON’T HAVE A
COW, MAN.
A critic paper on the Health and Animal Agriculture
on Developing Countries
Hannah Yzabel Pingol
10-Garcia
contributes a vast array of carbon footprint and consumes 30% of the potable
water on earth (Penn State University, 2016). It is the main cause of different
ice caps, and the barren Amazon rainforest (Berke, 2018). Contrary to popular
buses combined (Capper, 2014). Awareness regarding this issue has been
theory, animal agriculture has the capacity to affect three major sectors of
the environment; namely, water, carbon emissions, and the health of the
people eating its products. Approximately 660 gallons of water are used to
produce one burger from corporations like McDonalds or Burger King (United
of water on Earth can be used for safe consumption. Only 1% of that 2.5%
can be obtained from means such as fresh surface water from specific bodies
desalination. These expensive methods can offset the prices given for water
In terms of the effect of animal agriculture on the Earth’s water supply, the
food we eat have a specific water footprint which refers to the amount of
certain type of food must not exceed its weight in liters in terms of water
that should not be exceeded. In consideration of the rate that we are going,
the Earth can easily exceed this limit through animal agriculture alone, by
producing meat and dairy products (United Nations Food and Agriculture
areas that are susceptible to disasters. One example is the Philippines; since
the significance of the study serves more than provide assistance to the
current state of how the practice of animal agriculture has affected the
The gaps and conflicts that are identified are the lack of support of
the sake of the environment as of there are many billionaires around the
world that makes animal agriculture as their income, the destruction of the
society comes in the hand of these entrepreneurs who’s only source of living
is through animal agriculture, and though the people would eat less meat ,
lack of knowledge of the people that focuses ore on fossil fuels and other
things, but the effects of stoping total pollution would still be present due to
know that the meat in their plate is killing our mother earth, as Meat and
Pouktry has a bigger effect on the world than their cars and cigarettes,
Here are some examples of the problems given in the research (Steinfield,
2012)
Given that intensification is probably inevitable, how do we reconcile
food
might take place to help save the environment but would not put the
body that would not put the same risk as animal agriculture does to
the planet
Changes in Sustainable
Eliminating
Diet for Living to All
Animal
Humans and better
Agriculture
;Better Health water supply .
dietary plan and the best replacement for meat is vegetables as it also
produce protein, it would cause better health for the humans and
your yards than to raise cows and roosters that woud cause you a lot
and a longer period of time to adapt in to, it would reach out to and
extinct global hunger and our water supply would be efficient because
there would be more for humans than animals, the animals that is
exemptified to this project b=would be brought back to their natural
home as this would stop animal cruelty, would be better for the people
reviewed for the study. In this case, different ideas through multiple
Penn State University. (2016, May 3). Water Sustainability and Animal Agriculture. Retrieved
sustainability-and-animal-agriculture/
assets/banr/AnimalProductionMaterials/Steinfeld.pdf
Berke, J. (2018, April 7). How eating meat creates a 'dead zone' the size of New Jersey in the
https://www.businessinsider.com/eating-meat-affects-environment-dead-zone-2018-4
Development and Cooperation Europe. (2017, February 25). Controlling our food. Retrieved
number-multinational-corporations-control-global-food-industry-field-supermarket-shelf
United States Enviromental Protection Agency. (2012, March 22). Virtual Water, Real Impacts:
World Water Day 2012. Retrieved from United States Enviromental Protection Agency:
https://blog.epa.gov/2012/03/22/virtual-water-real-impacts-world-water-day-2012/
United States Bureau of Reclamation. (2017, April 10). Worldwide Water Supply. Retrieved
ww-water-sup.html
Stoddard, E. (2018, April 3). Cape Town 'Day Zero' pushed back to 2019 as dams fill up in South
town-day-zero-pushed-back-to-2019-as-dams-fill-up-in-south-africa-idUSKCN1HA1LN
Vanham, D. (2016). Does the water footprint concept provide relevant information to address the
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. (n.d.). Prospects for the Environment.
http://www.fao.org/3/y3557e/y3557e11.htm
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. (2012). Health and Animal Agriculture in