Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Foamed Spacer for the foamed spacer - on surface, weak zone and bottom hole
depths.
General description The foamed spacer property evolution from casing shoe to
The spacer is a stabilized system obtained by injecting “on surface was plotted as depth function. See Fig.4.
the fly”, and through a foam generator proper amounts of We have prepared Fig.5 with the pore pressure data
nitrogen to the cross-linked gel that includes foaming obtained during the open hole logging using the computer
surfactant and stabilizer agents in its formula. program output information. It shows ECD’s behavior in
The tee foam generator provides the level of mixing contrast with well depth. The foamed spacer allows the
energy required to incorporate gaseous nitrogen into the maintenance of the required ECD’s avoiding the inflow of
external liquid phase as discrete high-energy bubbles. It is a formation fluid or cement slurry loss towards weak
very important device that contributes to the foamed spacer formations.
stability.
Nitrogen is pumped at 1200 to 1500 SCFM constant flow Foamed spacer lab test and field research
rate, adapting the cross-linked gel flow rate in order to obtain Water base gel formulation
500 to 750 SCF / bbl N2 concentration in the foamed spacer. 50 lb./1000 gal Gelling Agent (HPG) + Gel stabilizer + pH
The shear experienced while is circulating downhole through Buffers + Surfactant & Foam stabilizer agents
the casing contributes to foamed spacer homogeneity.
Nitrogen concentration is programmed to obtain the Intensive quality control test are conducted in the
required density to prevent formation breakdown and cement laboratory using standard foam fracturing fluids procedures:
slurries loss to weak formations. Computer assisted programs Cross-linking time test
are used to pre-plan changing nitrogen concentration, if Optimum cross-linker concentration test prevents the
necessary, by adapting the design to particular job harmful loading variation effects.
requirements. Over cross-linking results in loss of stability, reduction in
Foamed spacer density decreases as it ascends in the the fluid loss control and loss of viscosity. Under cross-linking
annular space, compensating ECD increase caused by the results in lower viscosity and instability. Variations of pH
cement slurries annular circulation. could cause the same effect.
Foam stability test
Nitrogen effects on the foamed spacer properties Foamed spacer stability depends on texture with good
The main effects caused by the addition of nitrogen to the bubble size distribution and high level of dispersion
cross-linked spacer are: characterized by many very small bubbles that have a high
specific area.
Yield increase. Cross-linked water base gel viscosity has an elastic surface
Density decrease. layer optimum for foam stability.
Apparent viscosity increase – the flat profile allows to The basic tests are repeated at the wellsite as part of final
maintain a neat interface between the displaced mud fluid quality control to assure a proper performance.
and the foamed spacer thus helping to avoid
channelling. Foamed spacer pumping procedure
Effectiveness of gelled and partially dehydrated mud Cross-linker additive is injected to the cementing-pump
removal increases due to the enhancement of the suction, maintaining lab test determined ratio, with the batch
spacer erodability properties. The foamed spacer mixed linear gel. The implemented system assures a shorter
contains a large amount of energy through the cross-linking time than the one required to reach the foam
entrained nitrogen gas that strongly contributes to the generator.
annular cleanliness. The cross-linked gel quality and cross-linking time are
Solid suspending properties improvement. It allows checked through a sampler located at the cementing pump
better solid transport. outlet, which shows the appearance of gel at surface
An increase in temperature stability range. conditions and eventually allow us to modify the cross-linker
Fluid loss reduction. injection rate.
An excellent drilling mud compatibility kept Nitrogen gas is injected to the cross-linked gel at the foam
throughout the process. generator, with a proper size selected choke; assuring that
sufficient energy is provided to the system to create stable
Bottom hole, weak zone and wellhead foamed spacer foam.
properties planning
A computer-assisted program is used to determine Foamed spacer surface handling procedure
commingled fluid to liquid ratio (VLR) foamed spacer quality The foamed spacer return to surface is controlled by the
as nitrogen concentration and depth function; e.g. El Tordillo following standard procedure:
Field type well: Table 2 shows the main properties estimated ♦ Stop casing reciprocation before foamed spacer
wellhead circulation.
4 C.D.DEGNI, C.R.MARCINKEVICIUS SPE 53955
♦ Close annular BOP. The registered cement logs were classified, according to
♦ Divert annular flow through a choke that allows, casing and formation bonding and general zonal isolation as:
maintaining a 100-psi to 300-psi backpressure, to ♦ 4 Very good
control the nitrogen expansion from annulus to ♦ 3 Good
atmospheric conditions. ♦ 2 Fair
♦ 1 Bad
Fig.6 shows the foamed spacer after having circulated An important cement quality improvement was obtained
down through the casing and returning to surface, cleaning the through well conditioning procedure and foamed spacer
annulus. design implemented as shown in Fig. 10.
Evaluation Conclusion
Up to now thirteen wells have been cemented in one-stage The following conclusions can be drawn from the present
jobs using foamed spacer and lightened pre-flushes ahead of experience:
normal density cement slurries.
Initially two wells were cemented using foamed spacer and 1. Mud rheology and well conditioning procedure while
lightened pre-flushes, but without proper circulation at running casing were important issues to be aware due to
intermediate depths while running casing. A total loss of their fundamental incidence on whole cementing job
return was observed at total depth in both wells. results.
The cementing job was initiated without circulation and in 2. A proper casing centralization and reciprocation while
spite of the normal surface operations only fair results were conditioning and cementing were maintained.
obtained. Cement columns barely reached from bottom to the 3. Final circulation process on bottom completes well
weak zone depths, showing a good quality of cement in conditioning and assures a clean annulus previous to the
general. Both wells were squeeze cemented in order to correct initiation of cementing job.
lack of isolation until the programmed top of cement. 4. Foamed spacer contributed to the efficient displacement
As a direct consequence, the well conditioning procedure of drilling fluid, helping to erode the partially dehydrated
was established and maintained up to date due to its filter cake. Foamed spacer shear stress exceeds the one in
importance to the cementing operation success. drilling mud, allowing the solids removed from the
After that, an improvement in the general cost and quality wellbore to be eroded and transported to surface.
was observed for the rest of the wells. 5. Lightened chemical wash contributed to improve drilling
fluid removal by additionally eroding partially dehydrated
For evaluation purposes we should consider these main mud filter cake. Its water wetting effect leads to better
cementing job indicators: cement bonding to casing and to formation.
♦ Cementing cost 6. Lightened reactive flush helped to reduce permeability
♦ Cement column heights across thief zones, to prevent loss of circulation and to
♦ Cement column quality improve cement bonding to formation.
7. Due to the well conditioning procedure and foamed
Total cementing costs spacer use, total cementing costs were significantly
Due to this procedure cementing costs were significantly reduced and a general quality improvement was observed.
reduced (more than 42%). 8. The new approach also reduced well completion time and
Fig. 7 shows the total cementing costs obtained by using allowed normal perforation, evaluation and production of
both systems: the selected pay zones.
♦ Conventional: fourteen wells (28 cementing stages) 9. Productivity of the drilled wells has risen together with
♦ Foamed Spacer: thirteen wells (13 one-stage jobs) other technical advances that have improved drilling
economics both IRR and NPV.
Cement column heights
Fig.8 shows the improvement arising from comparing the Acknowledgements
programmed cement columns heights and the ones actually We wish to thank TECPETROL SA and HALLIBURTON
achieved. ARGENTINA SA managements for their support in
For conventional primary cementing jobs the determined preparation and presentation of this paper.
ratio includes the column heights in both stages.
Nomenclature
Cement quality qualitative interpretation VLR Commingled fluid to liquid ratio
Analysis of the CBL - VDL and ultrasonic logs - Fig.9 - IRR Internal rate of return
gives qualitative information about cement job results – casing NPV Net present value
and formation bonding, mud channelling, occluded gas, etc. – POOH Pull out of the hole
that contribute to the evaluation of the specific zone isolation. BHA Bottom hole assembly
Table 1
Flow Lost Inicial Final
Joint Depth Time REMARKS
Rate volume pressure pressure
[ft] [gpm] [min] [bbl] [psi] [psi]
Injected 60 bbl viscous pill +
44 1962 278 26 30 325 300 + 1 Sk biopolymer + 2 L.C.M Sks
Table 2
Bottom Weak
Surface
hole zone
Temperature [°F] 244 157 80
Figure 1
4000 14
3500 12
Weak zone Fracture pressure
3000
10
2500
8
2000
6
1500
500 2
0 0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850
Volume [bbl]
Fig 2
CEMENTING LINE
Fig. 3
LOCATION LAYOUT
Manifold
BULK
BATCH
MIXER
NITROGEN TRUCK
CEMENTING
UNIT FLUSHES TANKS
COMPU VAN
8 C.D.DEGNI, C.R.MARCINKEVICIUS SPE 53955
Figure 4
FOAMED SPACER DENSITY & QUALITY PLOT
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
FOAM
3000 QUALITY
3500
DENSITY
4000 QUALITY
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
FOAM
8000 DENSITY
8500
9000
9500
10000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
FOAM DENSITY [ppg]
SPE 53955 PRIMARY CEMENTING OPTIMIZATION: WELL CONDITIONING PROCEDURE AND FOAMED SPACER USE 9
Figure 5
PRESSUR E GRADIENTS
7" CASING CEMENTING JOB
5,000
PORE
5,500
FRAC
ECD máx
6,000
ECD mín.
6,500
7,000
DEPTH [ft
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000
PRESSURE [psi]
10 C.D.DEGNI, C.R.MARCINKEVICIUS SPE 53955
Figure 6
Figure 7
100 %
57.5 %
Figure 8
90
80
91.0
70
60
71.3
50
40
30
20
10
0
CONVENTIONAL FOAMED SPACERS
12 C.D.DEGNI, C.R.MARCINKEVICIUS SPE 53955
Figure 9
CEMENT QUALITY
4
3.85
3
2 2.50
0
CONVENTIONAL FOAMED SPACERS
Figure 10
0 30 44°
44°
MILES SOMOCURA MASSIF
CHILE
OCEAN
WESTERN CENTRAL
AREA AREA
ANDEAN
BELT
COMODORO
WESTERN RIVADAVIA
ATLANTIC
46° AREA CENTRAL 46°
BASIN OFFSHORE
COMODORO
RIVADAVIA SOUTH-
WESTERN
AREA SOUTH
47° FLANK 47°
DESEADO MASSIF
71° 70° 69° 68° 67° 66°
TORDILLO FIELD
EL TORDILLO
PERIMETRO=154 Km
8.8 Km
2
SUPERFICIE=116 Km
21 Km