Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
My class is a fourth-grade class at Pathways Elementary in Ormond Beach, Florida. The class
consists of eleven girls and ten boys around the age of ten. The overall ability level of the class is
very mixed; there are different ability groups: low, average, and high, based off of different
subject areas and skills. Each group meets a different number of times each week based on their
needs. My class consists of one ELL student, Nicole, who is classified as Asian and her first
language is Chinese. I have one ESE student, Tucker, who receives support during ELA and
math. He leaves to another room during ELA and a facilitator comes in to work with him on
math during that time. None of my students have allergies or take medication. Three students
have glasses: Ar’niyah, Xavier, and Carmen. None of my students have hearing aids.
Assessment C- Self
I knew the content well in that I could describe what a gist statement is and why they are
important but was not able to go into more detail or elaborate as much as I would like to. I used
terms or phrases that the students might have been familiar with to help me explain what a gist is
and tried to connect it to what they have learned previously. By explaining gist statements using
the 5 W’s, they should have already known what the 5 W’s are and been able to identify them in
a text.
I tried to use an activity that would engage the students more by including examples from things
they are familiar with or might enjoy. The order of instruction was good, other than the video not
working when it should have and went in a logical order. The classroom is already set up into
groups, so I like to allow them to work together on certain tasks that they could benefit from
My rapport with the students improves every day and with this being the first lesson I taught to
the class, it was difficult for me to find those connections so quickly. I am always respectful
towards the students and let them know that they need to be respectful towards me as well, and
their classmates. With this lesson, I tried to make sure that I was smiling and relaxing more and
the students were able to see that and enjoyed me messing around or joking with them.
There were not many transitions or materials that were used during this lesson; however, I did
utilize classroom jobs when appropriate and made sure students knew what they were doing. I
was still learning classroom procedures and when they can/can’t go to the bathroom or get water.
With this particular lesson, managing student behavior was pretty much nonexistent. The class is
fairly well-behaved to begin with and does not have too many behavior issues, but when there
are, my teacher tends to jump in and take care of it before I get the chance. Students were talking
and arguing about something and my CT has to talk to them multiple times before they stop.
While I did explain to them what they were going to do at all times, I could have been more
direct with my instructions and made sure they understood before moving on. I thought I did a
good job explaining the task and what they were to do, but my CT had to ask for clarification on
higher-order questions and how to relate them back to the lesson. Coming up with the questions
is pretty hard, but I do enjoy asking them to see what the students really understood or see how
they can show me what they learned. I do plan a good amount of comprehension questions and
I do a good job planning engaging lessons and thinking about what activities they would enjoy
doing to help them learn better. I used Frozen as the example when writing my gist that way they
would pay attention and know what movie I was talking about. I also had them write on their
desks with dry-erase boards and they always enjoy doing that.
I need more variation in my assessment and need to keep in mind the best ways to assess the
students that will give me the best data. My assessments are pretty basic and mostly consist of
simple activities done throughout the lesson that will show me whether or not they understood
the content being taught; however, I could be more creative in the types of assessment I give. For
this lesson in particular, the assessment was not as strong because I did not have a written sample
of their gist statements and went mostly by my observation while they were writing on their
desks.
I always dress nicely and appropriately and make sure I am acting professional within the school
at all times. I treat my CT with respect and always make decisions that will benefit my students
the most.
Assessment C- Peers
My scores were pretty balanced between those that scored me. My lowest scores were given to
in questioning techniques, and only one rated me as “needs improvement” in assessment. I think
these scores are mostly due to the fact that my video showed my CT taking over a bit towards the
end and handling the classroom management; however, I do believe that my management was
good throughout the rest of the video. My highest scores were given to me in demonstrating
knowledge of content and pedagogy and creating an environment of respect and rapport, which I
was rated as proficient. I believe this is due to how I interact with the kids and try to
relate/connect with them, specifically while I was telling one of my students that she had to have
Comments
“You seemed more comfortable and confident in this class compared to videos from last
semester.”
Recommendations
I think my classmates were very thorough in my evaluations and gave me some really great
feedback. I do think all of these commendations and recommendations are valid because my
classmates saw things in my lesson that I may not have noticed. I really enjoyed reading their
comments and recommendations and would try to implement all of them in my classroom. I do
say “umm” and “okay?” a lot and I have already been told this many time, but it is so difficult
for me to try and refrain from saying it. Questioning is something I am definitely working on
getting better at and improving in difficulty and relevance. I believe all of their comments and
feedback is valid because they are rating me based off of what they saw and what they noticed I
Reflection
1. Were your teaching objectives appropriate? Did you meet your objectives? How do
you know?
I do believe that my teaching objective was appropriate to the lesson and requirements
were met. The standard was main idea and summarizing the text and I decided to teach
the students how to create gist statements because they really summarize the main idea of
a text without adding too any details. I chose this standard and objective because the
students are often tested on picking a sentence that summarizing a text. I know that my
objective was met by observing their work as they were creating their gists and they all
understood the concept of a gist statement and how they are ten words or less.
the students and tried to use examples that interested them, which helped overall with
their understanding of summarizing with gists. The way my strategies were used could
use some improvement because I had some students who were still confused during the
writing portion and had to go around and help many of them/explain what they were
supposed to be doing.
I would say ineffective only because there really was not an adequate assessment that
could have been collected that would tell me how well they understood the lesson. I did
collect their graphic organizers but did not have any written form of their gist statements
4. How did you differentiate your lesson for diverse learners? Were the differentiation
I allowed them to work with their table member or individually depending on whether
they wanted to discuss ideas or not and I allowed them to write their gist statements on
their desks with dry-erase marker. I do think allowing them to work individually or with
their group was effective because I could tell that some of the students who were
struggling enjoyed being able to discuss their ideas with their team before creating their
gist statements. By allowing them to write on their desks with the dry-erase marker, they
were more engaged in the activity and motivated to complete the task.
5. Were your questions high quality and higher-order? Explain. How did you facilitate
students’ responses?
I do not think I had very many higher-order questions during this lesson. Most of the
questions were simple comprehension questions; however, I did ask them why gist
statements would be important for summarizing. Asking them to think about the
importance of gist statements required them to think about how gist statements and
summaries and different and how smaller summaries would be used/why they would be
used. I like to call on students who are not raising their hands just to see their thought
process and my CT always says “it is okay to admit that you don’t know, but it’s not
okay to not try”, which I love because it communicates to the students that they should
always be trying and giving their best, even if they do not know the answer. I try to make
sure I call on students equally and not put too much attention on the same students.
6. Explain the impact your teaching strategies had on student learning. What evidence
I think the students listened very well during the lesson and were able to identify what a
gist statement is and when they should be used/why they are important. I tried to make
sure I really explained how a gist statement should look and I can tell that they listened
and remembered because whenever I ask them to summarize or write a summary, they
always ask me if they should write a paragraph summary or a gist statement. They are
able to recognize the difference between the two and know that a gist statement is shorter.
If I were to re-teach the lesson, I would focus on being more specific and explicit in the
instruction and giving them more time to practice. I believe their gist statements were
very good from it only being the first lesson; however, to make them better, I would go
into more detail about what information to look at and how to form the gist statements,
8. How would you change your lesson if you were to teach it again?
I would have given Frozen as my example and walked them through the process of
creating the gist statements (I do), then I would have them walk me through finding the
information for another example (we do), and I would have ended by having them work
independently to create their own gist statements about the book. I would have kept my
idea of allowing them to write on their desks with dry-erase marker but would have had
them record their final gist statements on the paper that I collected that way I would have
Summary
I enjoyed the experience of the microteach critique and being able to see how my classmates
However, being able to re-watch my lesson and see how my classmates rated me, I was able to
see specific area of my lesson that went well and could have gone better. I think I do well with
planning lessons and attempting to make them more engaging for the students, but sometimes
actually teaching the lessons goes differently; either because of time management, things go
differently than expected, or I forget to do parts of the lesson. I do think that my teaching has
gotten a lot better over time and I am more comfortable teaching and being flexible than I used to
be. Aside from classroom management (PGP), I think the Danielson components that I need to
focus on most would be assessment and questioning. I try to plan different types of assessment to
make sure that they are not always the same, but sometimes the assessments I plan are not
assessments that can provide me data or information I need to move on. With questioning, I think
I am good at asking questions for comprehension, but I struggle more when it comes to creating
higher-order questions that support the lesson. In order to improve, I can be more careful during
my planning and make sure I am using assessments that will give me adequate information and
data and plan plenty of questioning throughout the lesson. I will also ask my peers or CT for any