Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The actual effect varies, though, as it depends upon several different factors, including the
amount of current administered, duration of which it was in contact with the body, pathway of
the current, voltage applied, and impedance of the body itself.
All of that being said, if it comes down to one or the other, AC can generally be viewed as the
more dangerous of the two currents — here’s why:
1) To start off, in order for both currents to have the same effect on the human body, the
magnitude of DC flow of constant strength needs to be two to four times great than AC; that is,
more DC current is needed to induce the same amount of physical damage as AC current. This is
because the effect of the currents on the body is a direct result of the excitatory actions of its
magnitude — specifically, the actual making and breaking of the current itself. Such excitatory
actions include nerve / muscle stimulation, induction of cardiac atrial or ventricular fibrillation,
and more.
For DC to produce the same effect as AC on the human body, its flow of constant strength must
be two to four times that being administered by the AC.
2) When death by electric shock occurs, it’s typically due to ventricular fibrillation, and the
likelihood of a human suffering this sort of life-ending injury is much higher when coming in
contact with an AC than a DC due to the fact that the human body’s threshold of DC-caused
ventricular fibrillation is several times higher than for AC.
3) Generally speaking, the human body’s impedance is higher for DC, and it only decreases
when the frequency increase. As such, the severity of electric shock is less when in contact with
DC than it is with AC.
4) It’s easier to let go / remove contact with “live” parts in the case of DC than AC. This runs
counter to the popular belief that because the alternating cycles of an AC current pass through
zero, the individual is afforded enough time to pull their limb / body away from the part itself,
whereas with the constant flow of the DC current, there is no frequency oscillations that afford
the brief moment for the person to pull their body away. The basis for this argument can be
sourced in the “let-go” experiment, which was reported in the same aforementioned IEC
publication 60479. In it, the lowest level of current that could safely pass through a human body
was administered through an electrode held in a test person’s hand; it was enough current to
make the person unable to open his hand and drop the electrode.
Without getting into all of the details of the actual experiment, the conclusion was that the test
subjects found it easier to release the electrode when DC was administered rather than AC.
Now, while it can be surmised that AC is more dangerous than DC, the safest solution is to avoid
contact with any and all high-voltage electrical conductors, no matter the type of electrical
current. As mentioned at the beginning of the article, any contact with an electrical current can
be hazardous.
An AC current is alternating in nature and follows a sine curve. It is continuously changing
direction and passing through zero to a maximum positive value and then to a maximum
negative value. The voltage of an AC current is a RMS or root mean square value, and the peak
or maximum value is 1.4 times the RMS value. It means that a 220 V AC supply is going to 308
Volts before coming down to zero and changing direction.
DC current is direct current and does not change in magnitude, though it can be negative or
positive depending on the direction of the circuit. DC current is ideal for electronic circuits
whereas AC is ideal for electrical installation and motors, etc.
(1) Hazards fill this entire intersection, which is similar to the one described in the down
wire incident. (Photos by Chris Greene.)
ALTERNATING CURRENT
AC is bi-directional, traveling in two directions, alternating back and forth, 60 times per
second, along the transmission line (Figure 1). AC is the electricity supplied to your home.
To provide power to an urban area, the AC electric grid is typically supported by the
following:
• Substations of multiple types that convert and distribute the voltage.
• Transmission lines that move voltage greater than 100 kilovolts (kV) over a long
distance.
• Transformers that step down (reduce) or step up (increase) voltage.
• Primary or high-voltage lines with capacities generally less than 34kV for city grids.
• Secondary lines that carry less than 600 volts are stepped-down lines that feed smaller
transformers.
• Service lines used to bring power from smaller transformers to the public consumption.
For residential service, this generally means voltages of 120 and 480 for commercial.
High-voltage overhead transmission lines will generally have capacities greater than
100kV and will be unshielded wire. Overhead primary lines use a pole-mounted step-down
transformer to convert the high voltage to a more usable 120V residential secondary feed.
Generally, these lines are wrapped and shielded using a material commonly referred to as
“tree wrap” that protects the line from faulting against a tree.
Seattle’s key infrastructure areas are supported by an underground high-voltage network
system that will provide redundancies to ensure no loss of power to critical loads such as
hospitals and other key business areas.
Automatic reclosers are commonly used with overhead primary lines to maintain power in
the event of a fault. This feature attempts to clear a fault (making three attempts over five
seconds) rather than simply de-energize the line and leave the circuit open. When a fault
occurs, the circuit “opens,” which interrupts the flow of energy. The reclosing feature will
attempt to reclose the circuit in an attempt to “blow off” the item causing the fault. If it
succeeds, the branch or other item will be moved off the line with the energy surge. But if
unsuccessful after the three attempts (over five seconds), the circuit will remain open and
voltage will be unable to flow through the circuit. An interesting side note is that automatic
reclosers have received heavy criticism for potentially exacerbating some of the recent
wildland fires in central California.
AC lines are equally common underground and are also subject to line fatigue, faults, and
chemical or rodent damage, which can result in manhole fires and lead to explosions under
certain conditions.
AC VS. DC: DIFFERENCES
It is critical to understand the differences between AC and DC voltage. The following may
keep you safe on the next “line down” alarm:
• Your stray voltage detector will not detect DC voltage. When AC current alternates, it
produces a collapsing sine wave of electromagnetic energy, which is what your stray
voltage detector reads; it is not present with DC current. You must understand how to
use the electrical detection equipment on your apparatus and its limitations.
• AC and DC down power lines act differently when they contact the ground. AC and
DC lines that have made contact with the ground after an incident may see the ground as
a “load” and remain energized. A significant difference is that a down AC overhead line
will create a ground gradient hazard. Conversely, a down DC line may be
energized without the presence of a strong detectable ground gradient voltage field. A
ground gradient field generally only occurs when very high voltages are achieved, but in
the case of mass transit power lines, this is uncommon. A voltage detector will provide
no indication of DC energy on an energized DC line and thus may give a false sense of
safety to responders.
• AC and DC hazards often share the same space. Recognize that these hazards can
simultaneously be present. Consider a DC rectifying station. My experience has revealed
that rectifying stations are always married to AC transformers in one large area. They
can be underground or aboveground. In residential neighborhoods, they are often pad
mounted; the only indication of their presence may be a six-foot cyclone fence and a
sign that says, “Caution High Voltage.” They are much smaller than traditional
substations and may be mistaken for benign metal lockers unless you look closely or are
familiar with the equipment.
• Identify the responsible party. Many cities delineate the responsible party by what
party rectified or transformed the power last. For example, Seattle City Light distributes
most of the AC power in the city, whereas King County Metro Transit delivers all
rectified DC power used by its mass transportation equipment. Depending on the
situation, the party responsible for deenergizing the down line or energy equipment may
differ. This can cause confusion and delay capturing definitive information during these
incidents.