Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PERFORMANCE
HIRING
THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE
If you’re ever having problems in life or in business, it’s usually because of not understanding what’s
happening around you with people. It’s quite rare to go home at night and have a sleepless night because,
the photocopier is not working. It’s normally because someone has done something and you can’t
understand, and you don’t know how to handle it. Performia is there to remove this mystery for you.
This in fact is why and how Performia was founded in Australia. Gareth Jekel, Director of Performia Australia,
a refrigeration mechanic by trade, built his first commercial refrigeration business at the age of 27, to 150
full time staff and $ 21m sales.
Throughout the years whilst building his business, the areas that increasingly took more time and attention
from Gareth all had to do with people. He knew the technology of supermarket refrigeration and the required
business processes but as the team grew, the business would get more complex and slow. He hired key
executives with long, relevant experience and top salaries, but this only amplified the mystery when things
did not get better, easier, more productive. Eventually the personnel issues compounded and the frustration
outweighed the value of continuing and Gareth decided to sell his business.
Around the same time, Gareth attended a business seminar on the basics of
building productive teams by recruitment strategy consulting organisation
Performia. The presenter, Marten Runow, founder of Performia
international who at the time was raising awareness in Australia and
looking for partners to continue Performia’s international expansion
in Australia.
This is how Gareth found his new passion, Performia, and embarked
on the the strategy to establish and expand Performia in Australia —
and in 2006, Performia was born in Australia!
This is why your hiring strategy becomes so essential to take your business
to the next level and the most important area to be applying best practice as
it underlies the quality and profitability of every other process.
ABOUT PERFORMIA
Performia is a global HR consultancy specialising in recruitment tools and strategy. Performia international head office
is based out of Stockholm Sweden, with offices in 29 countries, and servicing more than 10,000 active clients in over
50 countries ranging from large public companies to SMEs and micro businesses. Performia services include strategic
recruitment advice, training on building hiring processes and teams, screening services, assisted recruitment and HR desking.
PRODUCTIVITY
Looking at this representation, it makes it very easy to see that there is
much more to know about hiring, about people, and looks and resumes
are not an effective method, they can actually be very misleading.
Of these two, the one who would be more cost effective to hire is
the second one. Why? Because most likely he has been passed
over by other businesses because they are not able to easily spot
how effective he will be. The first candidate could actually be two to
three times more expensive because she presents herself and her
credentials so well.
Looking at these next two, the first candidate is going to be the most expensive
or even dangerous because when you hire the second candidate, you are
already expecting she is not going to work out so you’re watching her, and
you’re looking for results and you will quickly move her out of the business.
The first candidate has already bluffed you in the interview and now
you are ready for him to produce great results and might even put him
in charge of large areas of your business. His area starts to drop off a
little bit. When you meet with him and ask “Hey, what’s happening?” he
says, “Well, you know, what we need is — if I had 2 more staff, I could
really make this branch rock”. As you are so confident with him, you give
him what he needs but 6 months passes and there’s been no change.
So you go back to him and ask “Hey, what’s happening here?” and the
reply is “Hey, you know what, we’re really pumping, we’ve got all these
programs ready to go! It’s going to be an unbelievable office and I’m
going to make you so much money! What I need is for your approval on
the $ 50,000 social media campaign, and you watch we’re just going to rock.”
You can see that this person is really starting to cost you a lot of money. You tell
yourself that doesn’t work and now you’re confused because you’ve hired this highly
competent person and everything he tells you makes sense — but you’re getting no
value out of him and in actual fact now, a year later, you’ve paid his wage, the wage of
two more staff, and an expensive campaign. He has cost you about $ 700,000 with no
improvement, and sometimes, it could be even worse outcomes than before this sort
of person started.
So now you decide you’d better to go up and spend two months with him and help him.
You want to make it work because of this feeling of responsibility you have — you don’t
feel you can terminate him because you’re the one that hired him and told everybody The second candidate might
how great he’s going to be. So now you waste two months and more money as well as just add no value.
lose other opportunity you would have created in your own office, only to find out that
The first candidate will
this person is absolutely useless, has been lying to you — and then one day you don’t
remove value from your busi-
see him again. That’s if you’re lucky enough, some of these candidates can present
ness and might even crash
themselves as your right-hand person for ten years which is why THESE are the people
the whole operation.
you’re going to be really careful to avoid.
The standard hiring process looks first at the resume which mostly indicates the person’s experience and
knowledge.
The Usual Process involves a lot of resume reading, filtering, interviews, confusion, only to hire someone
and now test them in the workplace. You might be quite good at this process and get acceptable or better
results, but how can you know out of everyone that applied, did you get the candidate that would add the
most value to your business?
The goal of the screening process is to locate the person that will add more
than the required value to the company, be easy to manage and safe for the
team and your business.
This requires a new, different method of screening that locates first, THE POTENTIAL VALUE A CANDIDATE
WILL ADD TO THE BUSINESS.
The job ad is actually the start of the screening process. HOW ARE CANDIDATES ATTRACTED TO YOUR
BUSINESS. How the ad is written will play a critical role in the rest of your hiring flow, and ultimately the
business performance.
THE JOB ad when written properly, will filter out those that feel entitled, meaning they will be expensive,
tough to manage and usually lower the productivity of the team, and attract those that want to be part of,
and contribute to the purpose and the game of adding value.
From split testing, it has been learned that jobs that “sell the position”
can attract 5 times more candidates, none or very few of which can
actually add the required value, compared to challenge based ads
that 80 % or more of the candidates have the potential to add the
value required and be considered for the next hiring step.
For positions where few candidates apply, making the job ad more
challenging can actually increase application numbers. Why?
Those that are not quite in the market, the more productive and
loyal, will be more inclined to apply to an ‘honest’ ad, where the
challenges are laid out and where they feel they will be respected
for the production record, not for how they look, their resume
and / or their political skills!
Reference checking, employment contracts, onboarding and performance measurement and management
are all important parts of the strategy, but do not create the same sort of change as placing challenging,
honest job ads and being able to grade productivity potential
Check the Never Make the Wrong Hire Again playlist on YouTube for more detailed
information, case studies and application of this strategy.
The chart on the right represents the productivity segments. On the side is number of people, and across
the bottom is the level of performance, meaning, how much a person is producing in a certain unit of time.
In 18 months, he turned the business around from losing $ 250m to not just breaking even but making $ 100m profit. He had
to actually let go of over 2000 staff during this period, something he did personally, not hiding behind HR teams, He did not
have an office, but instead, he worked in each area of the business that needed to have staff numbers reduced and have its
productivity increased.
He created a massive profit change. A true Top Performer. Before him, they had someone who was a good Doer trying to get
Vodafone set up in Australia. Grahame then transferred to Sweden, and turned the business around; within 9 months he had
taken it from a loss, to selling the business for €1,035 million.
Increased productivity.
Improved retention.
Safer workplaces.
Fun and fulfilling working environments.