Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A
PROJECT REPORT
ON
“A STUDY ON SALES PROMOTION OF HERO MOTOCORP”
WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE
TO
CHANDAN AUTOMOBILE,PATNA
HERO
A REPORT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT
FOR THE AWARD OF BACHELOR OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
Roll No.:-
Signature:-
Date:-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It gives me a great sense of pleasure to present the report of the B.B.M Project
undertaken during B.B.M Final Year. I owe special debt of gratitude to Mrs.
Soni Department of Marketing B.B.M, Arcade Business Collge, Patna, Bihar
for her constant support and guidance throughout the course of our work. Her
sincerity, thoroughness and perseverance have been a constant source of
inspiration for me. It is only her cognizant efforts that my endeavors have seen
light of the day. I also take the opportunity to acknowledge the contribution of
Mrs. Soni, Head of the Department of Marketing, Arcade Business College,
Patna, Bihar, for her full support and assistance during the development of the
project. I also do not like to miss the opportunity to acknowledge the
contribution of all the faculty members of the department for their kind
assistance and cooperation during the development of my project.
I also do not like to miss the opportunity to acknowledge the contribution of all
faculty members, of the department for their kind assistance and cooperation
during the development of our project. Last but not the least, I acknowledge my
friends for their contribution in the completion of the project.
Signature:-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pag
e
No.
DECLARATION---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ii
CERTIFICATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT----------------------------------------------------------------------- iv
ABSTRACT--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v
LIST OF FIGURES------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ix
CHAPTER 1(INTRODUCTION)----------------------------------------------------- 1
CHAPTER 8(CONCLUSION)------------------------------------------------------------------ 60
REFERENCES--------------------------------------------------------------------- 63
-
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
No.
2.1. Showing electricity generation through fuel cell 7
2.2. Alkaline fuel cell 10
2.3. Molten carbonate fuel cell 11
2.4. Phosphoric acid fuel cells 12
2.5. Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell 14
2.6. Solid oxide fuel cell 15
2.7. Effect of temperature and electrolyte on residual stresses in electrolyte 18
3.2. Block diagram of fuel cell distributed generation system 33
4.1 Single phase half bridge inverter 36
4.2. Reference voltage calculations and instantaneous outputs 37
4.3. Error current 38
4.4. Effect of changing β on harmonic system 40
4.5. AC harmonics transferred to inverter DC side 41
4.6. Effect of Va* on the error current duty cycle 42
5.1. Simulink model of boost converter 45
5.2. Equivalent circuit of IGBT 46
5.3. Control scheme of IGBT 47
5.4. SOFC inner block 48
5.5. Output voltage of SOFC 49
5.6. SOFC model connected with three phase load 49
5.7. Output, inverter output, load output 50
5.8. Rate of flow of oxygen and hydrogen 50
5.9. Three phase output voltage 51
5.10. Three phase output current 51
6.1. Schematic of concept of modeling approach 53
7.1. Thermal stress comparison 56
7.2. Different SOFC configuration 57
7.3. Thermal stress comparison with different configuration 58
7.4. Thermal stress comparison with different porosity 58
7.5 Thermal stress comparison and analysis 59
TITLE OF THE PRODUCT
“INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION
IN
FIELD OF SHOES.”
REEBOK
v/s
NIKE
CHAPTER-1
International trade in the 1990s has been dominated by the United States, Japan,
and the European Union (EU). Together they generate 80 percent of all world
trade and account for 65 percent of all foreign direct investment . One sign of
increased international competition has been the growth of imports and exports.
In the United States, for example, exports increased from less than 10 percent of
manufacturing output in the 1960s to more than 20 percent in the 1990s.
Similarly, imports of manufactured products increased from 5 percent of
domestic output in the 1960s to more than 25 percent in the 1990s.
There are three basic methods by which companies can compete in foreign
markets: exporting, licensing and other contractual agreements, and investment.
Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. One method may be
more appropriate for a certain line of business than another. For example,
exporting works for best for physical goods. Licensing and other contractual
arrangements are more appropriate for intangibles, services, and the transfer of
technology. Investment involves the transfer of an entire enterprise to another
country.
To enhance free trade at global level and attempt to bring all the
countries together for the purpose of trading.
To increase globalization by integrating the economies of different
countries.
To achieve world peace by building trade relations among different
nations.
To promote social and cultural exchange among the nations.
To assist developing countries in their economic and industrial growth
by inviting them to the international market thus eliminating the gap
between the developed and the developing countries.
To assure sustainable management of resources globally.
To propel export and import of goods globally and distribute the profit
among all participating countries.
To maintain free and fair trade.
Merchandise means goods that are tangible, i.e., those that can be seen and
touched. When viewed from this perceptive, it is clear that while merchandise
exports mean sending tangible goods abroad, merchandise imports means
bringing tangible goods from a foreign country to one’s own country.
Service exports and imports
Permitting another party in a foreign country to produce and sell goods under
your trademarks, patents or copyrights in lieu of some fee is another way of
entering into international business. It is under the licensing system that Pepsi
and CocaCola are produced and sold all over the world by local bottlers in
foreign countries.
Foreign investments
Monopoly Power
Those who add an international business to their assortment may also advantage
from currency fluctuations. For example, when the U.S. dollar is down, you
might be able to export more as foreign customers benefit from the favorable
currency exchange rate.
Limitations of Domestic Market
Increased revenues
One of the top advantages of international business is that you may be capable
to enlarge your number of probable clients. Each country you add to your list
can open up a new path to business growth and increased revenues.
Growth opportunities
International business can enlarge and expand its activities. This is because it
earns very high profits. It also gets financial help from the government.
Opportunity to specialize
International markets can open up avenues for a new line of service or products.
It can also give you an opportunity to specialize in a different area to serve that
market.
1.3 LIMITATIONS OF STUDY
Tariffs
A tariff is a tax on imported goods and services. The average tariff on dutiable imports in the
United States (that is, those imports on which a tariff is imposed) is about 4%. Some imports
have much higher tariffs. For example, the U.S. tariff on imported frozen orange juice is 35
cents per gallon (which amounts to about 40% of value). The tariff on imported canned tuna
is 35%, and the tariff on imported shoes ranges between 2% and 48%.
Antidumping Proceedings
One of the most common protectionist measures now in use is the antidumping proceeding. A
domestic firm, faced with competition by a foreign competitor, files charges with its
government that the foreign firm is dumping, or charging an “unfair” price. Under rules
spelled out in international negotiations that preceded approval of the World Trade
Organization, an unfair price was defined as a price below production cost or below the price
the foreign firm charges for the same good in its own country. While these definitions may
seem straightforward enough, they have proven to be quite troublesome. The definition of
“production cost” is a thoroughly arbitrary procedure. In defining cost, the government
agency invariably includes a specification of a “normal” profit. That normal profit can be
absurdly high. The United States Department of Justice, which is the U.S. agency in charge
of determining whether a foreign firm has charged an unfair price, has sometimes defined
normal profit rates as exceeding production cost by well over 50%, a rate far higher than
exists in most U.S. industry.
Quotas
A quota is a direct restriction on the total quantity of a good or service that may be imported
during a specified period. Quotas restrict total supply and therefore increase the domestic
price of the good or service on which they are imposed. Quotas generally specify that an
exporting country’s share of a domestic market may not exceed a certain limit.
In some cases, quotas are set to raise the domestic price to a particular level. Congress
requires the Department of Agriculture, for example, to impose quotas on imported sugar to
keep the wholesale price in the United States above 22 cents per pound. The world price is
typically less than 10 cents per pound.
Although such restrictions are called voluntary, they typically are agreed to only after
pressure is applied by the country whose industries they protect. The United States, for
example, has succeeded in pressuring many other countries to accept quotas limiting their
exports of goods ranging from sweaters to steel.
A voluntary export restriction works precisely like an ordinary quota. It raises prices for the
domestic product and reduces the quantity consumed of the good or service affected by the
quota. It can also increase the profits of the firms that agree to the quota because it raises the
price they receive for their products.
National Security
It is sometimes argued that the security of the United States would be threatened if this
country depended on foreign powers as the primary source of strategic materials. In time of
war, the United States might be cut off from sources of foreign supply and lose some of the
materials upon which U.S. industry depends.
One area where the national security argument is applied is the oil industry. Given the
volatility of the political situation in the Middle East, some people say, the United States
should protect the domestic oil industry in order to ensure adequate production capability in
the event Middle Eastern supplies are cut off.
Job Protection
The desire to maintain existing jobs threatened by foreign competition is probably the single
most important source of today’s protectionist policies. Some industries that at one time had a
comparative advantage are no longer among the world’s lowest-cost producers; they struggle
to stay afloat. Cost cutting leads to layoffs, and layoffs lead to demands for protection.
The model of international trade in perfect competition suggests that trade will threaten some
industries. As countries specialize in activities in which they have a comparative advantage,
sectors in which they do not have this advantage will shrink. Maintaining those sectors
through trade barriers blocks a nation from enjoying the gains possible from free trade.
A further difficulty with the use of trade barriers to shore up employment in a particular
sector is that it can be an enormously expensive strategy. Suppose enough of a foreign good
is kept out of the United States to save one U.S. job. That shifts the supply curve slightly to
the left, raising prices for U.S. consumers and reducing their consumer surplus. The loss to
consumers is the cost per job saved. Estimates of the cost of saving one job in the steel
industry through restrictions on steel imports, for example, go as high as $800,000 per year.
One reason often given for the perceived need to protect American workers against free
international trade is that workers must be protected against cheap foreign labor. This is an
extension of the job protection argument in the previous section. From a theoretical point of
view, of course, if foreign countries can produce a good at lower cost than we can, it is in our
collective interest to obtain it from them. But workers counter by saying that the low wages
of foreign workers means that foreign workers are exploited. To compete with foreign
workers, American workers would have to submit themselves to similar exploitation. This
objection, however, fails to recognize that differences in wage rates generally reflect
differences in worker productivity.
Consider the following example: Suppose U.S. workers in the tool industry earn $20 per hour
while Indonesian workers in the tool industry earn only $2 per hour. If we assume that the
tool industry is competitive, then the wages in both countries are based on the marginal
revenue product of the workers. The higher wage of U.S. workers must mean that they have a
higher marginal product—they are more productive. The higher wage of U.S. workers need
not mean that labor costs are higher in the United States than in Indonesia.
Further, we have seen that what matters for trade is comparative advantage, not comparative
labor costs. When each nation specializes in goods and services in which it has a comparative
advantage—measured in the amounts of other goods and services given up to produce
them—then world production, and therefore world consumption, rises. By definition, each
nation will have a comparative advantage in something.
Another justification for protectionist measures is that free trade is unfair if it pits domestic
firms against foreign rivals who do not have to adhere to the same regulatory standards. In
the debate over NAFTA, for example, critics warned that Mexican firms, facing relatively lax
pollution control standards, would have an unfair advantage over U.S. firms if restraints on
trade between the two countries were removed.
Provided the benefits of pollution exceed the costs in the poor country, with the costs
computed based on the preferences and incomes of people in that country, it makes sense for
more of the good to be produced in the poor country and less in the rich country. Such an
allocation leaves people in both countries better off than they would be otherwise. Then, as
freer trade leads to higher incomes in the poorer countries, people there will also demand
improvements in environmental quality.