Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
In the matter of
Vs.
State & Anr. …Respondents
MEMO OF PARTIES
VERSUS
1. STATE
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
NEW DELHI
APPELLANT
In the matter of
Vs.
State & Anr. …Respondents
INDEX
1. MEMO OF PARTIES A
5. VAKALATNAMA 1.25
_________________________________________________________
APPELLANT
NEW DELHI Through
In the matter of
VERSUS
1. STATE
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
NEW DELHI
Chander Sharma.
much the loan was advanced did not find mention either in
complainant/respondent No 2 herein.
not guilty and prayed for trial. During the course of trial
fact that the subject cheques have been lost and the
the appellant.
8. That after hearing both the parties the Ld. Trial Court
Hon’ble Court.
2. That the Ld. Trial Court did not appreciate the fact that the
5. That the Ld. Trial Court has observed but ignored the
10-2006 stating therein that the appellant has lost his bag
8. That the Ld. MM has grossly erred and ignored the fact
10. That the Ld. Trial Court did not appreciate the fact
set aside.
11. That the Ld. Trial Court has failed to appreciate the
aside.
13. That the Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate has failed to
appreciate the fact that the alleged loan was not legally
complaint before the local police and lodging FIR for the
to be set aside.
14. That the Ld. Trial Court has failed to consider various
equity.
present appeal.
prescribed limitation.
PRAYER:
Ld. Trial Court, accept present appeal and acquit the appellant
Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the light of the facts
APPELLANT
In the matter of
Vs.
State & Anr. …Respondents
AFFIDAVIT
Deponent
IA No__________/2010
IN
In the matter of
Vs.
State & Anr. …Respondents
4. That the appellant has a very good prima facie case in his
PRAYER:
4043/1/2007;
present appeal;
In the matter of
Vs.
State & Anr. …Respondents
AFFIDAVIT
Deponent
BEFORE THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT, DELHI COOPERATIVE
TRIBUNAL MATCALF HOUSE, NEW DELHI
VERSUS
MEMO OF APPEAL
VERSUS
APPELLANT
NEW DELHI
DATED: THROUGH
Dr.(Maj) J.C. VASHISTA
ADVOCATE
CH.NO.647, DWARKA COURTS,
NEW DELHI-110075
BEFORE THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT, DELHI COOPERATIVE
TRIBUNAL MATCALF HOUSE, NEW DELHI
VERSUS
has been paying all his dues to the respondent and there
Act, 2003.
as Annexure-A/1.
Annexure-A/3 (Colly.).
have any legal sanctity and the body was formed in-
10.09.2010 (supra).
2. That the respondent No.1 did never raised any demand as
his electricity.
issue.
amongst other:
(A) Because the Ld. Arbitrator has grossly erred on the matrix
mechanical manner.
(B) Because the Ld. Arbitrator did not apply his judicious mind
and has failed to appreciate the fact that the claim of the
respondent No.1.
(G) Because the Ld. Arbitrator has ignored the material facts
(H) Because the respondent No.2 has grossly erred in law and
(I) Because Ld. Arbitrator did not appreciate the fact that the
by the respondent No.1 and there had not been any dues
said claim.
(J) Because the Ld. Arbitrator did not appreciate the fact that
from absolute control, lock & key, care and custody and
appellant.
(L) Because findings of Ld. Arbitrator that the amount of
repudiated.
(M) Because the Ld. Arbitrator, despite its being in total death
Arbitrator.
(P) Because the Ld. Arbitrator did not appreciate the fact that
Appeal.
law.
8. That present Appeal is within limitation as prescribed
2003.
PRAYER:
(b) To set aside and quash order dated 10.09.2010 in the case
APPELLANT
NEW DELHI
DATED:08.11.2010 THROUGH
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
Verified at New Delhi on this 8th day of November 2010,
that the contents of my above affidavit are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and
nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
DEPONENT
BEFORE THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT, DELHI COOPERATIVE
TRIBUNAL MATCALF HOUSE, NEW DELHI
VERSUS
shall not suffer any loss if the stay granted in favour of the
appellant/applicant.
APPELLANT/APPLICANT
NEW DELHI
DATED: 08.11.2010 THROUGH
COUNSEL
BEFORE THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT, DELHI COOPERATIVE
TRIBUNAL MATCALF HOUSE, NEW DELHI
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
DEPONENT
BEFORE THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT, DELHI COOPERATIVE TRIBUNAL,
NEW DELHI
VERSUS
INDEX
1. MEMO OF APPEAL
5. ANNEXURE-A/1.
COPY OF ORDER DATED 10.09.2010
IN ARBITRATION CASE NO.2789/DR/ARB/09-10
PASSED BY SH. N.L. SETHI
ARBITRATOR (REGISTRAR’S NOMINEE).
6. ANNEXURE-A/2
COPY OF ORDER DT. 04.02.2010 PASSED
BY THE DY. REGISTRAR (ARBITRATION)
R.C.S. PARLIAMANTARY STREET, NEW DELHI
IN THE ARBITRATION CASE NO. 2789/DR/ARB/09-10.
7. VAKALATNAMA.
APPELLANT
NEW DELHI
DATED:08.11.2010 THROUGH