Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

 

Breast size: a human anomaly


Carole Jahme
Carole Jahme shines the cold light of evolutionary psychology on readers' problems. This week:
breast size
Fri 14 May 2010 06.47 EDT

From John, a student

I'm an animal science student and during our mammogenesis lecture a professor brought up the
obvious, but seemingly overlooked notion of the size of the female human breast. Other species do
have obvious teats and great apes have breasts, but humans are at the extreme end – obviously not
all – but it does make one wonder on a selection and genetic level, why?

Carole replies:

The full, plump bosom seen in the human ape is an anomaly. No other primate has a permanent
breast. During lactation all the ape species develop a full breast to store milk. In non-human
primates (and other mammal species) a full breast is a clear indication the female is suckling
young. Not so in humans. In addition, females
in early adolescence can start developing a
breast before menarche and females maintain
breasts post menopause, so the full breast is
not a reliable indicator of fertility. Neither is
size an indicator of milk production – bigger
breasts don't necessarily produce more milk. It
is the symmetry of the breasts that indicates
the phenotypic quality and fitness of the
individual female, not the size.

The sex appeal of rounded female buttocks and


plump breasts is both universal and unique to
the human primate1. Fertile women tend not to
store fat around the abdomen, so the waist of a
fertile female is usually slimmer than her hips.
Other female primates do not have fat
deposited on the rump. For example, the
female gorilla has a skinny posterior and stores
fat on her abdomen, as do human males. So it
has been widely theorised that the plump
buttock and bosom of modern women are
sexual ornaments, selected for by ancestral
males2. Seen from a distance the adult female
form, either from behind or from the front, can
be recognised as distinct from the male of the
Ask Carole: Chimpanzee wearing spectacles Photograph: Public species. An hourglass figure, plus youthfulness,
Domain would have attracted male hominids looking
for mating opportunity3. The hourglass figure
remains attractive to modern males. Over the centuries females attempting to increase their mate
choice have dressed to exploit this shape (corsets, bustles and wonder bras). If ancestral males
had not shown a preference for the mutation producing symmetrical, plump bosoms, modern
women's chests would resemble the flat thoraxes of the other apes.

Today, plastic surgery is used by some women, particularly those working in the sex industry, to
enhance bust size and exploit ancient male programming. But the ultimate function of the human
breast becomes clear only when an infant is born and lactation begins.

1) Miller, G (2000) The Mating Mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature.
Vintage

2) Moller, AP, Soler, M and Thornhill R (1995) Breast asymmetry, sexual selection, and human
reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology. 16 (3): 207-219

3) Singh, D (1995) Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast
asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology. 16 (6): 465-481

Since you’re here…


… we have a small favour to ask. More people around the world are reading The Guardian’s
independent, investigative journalism than ever before. We’ve now been funded by over one

S-ar putea să vă placă și