Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
I'm an animal science student and during our mammogenesis lecture a professor brought up the
obvious, but seemingly overlooked notion of the size of the female human breast. Other species do
have obvious teats and great apes have breasts, but humans are at the extreme end – obviously not
all – but it does make one wonder on a selection and genetic level, why?
Carole replies:
The full, plump bosom seen in the human ape is an anomaly. No other primate has a permanent
breast. During lactation all the ape species develop a full breast to store milk. In non-human
primates (and other mammal species) a full breast is a clear indication the female is suckling
young. Not so in humans. In addition, females
in early adolescence can start developing a
breast before menarche and females maintain
breasts post menopause, so the full breast is
not a reliable indicator of fertility. Neither is
size an indicator of milk production – bigger
breasts don't necessarily produce more milk. It
is the symmetry of the breasts that indicates
the phenotypic quality and fitness of the
individual female, not the size.
Today, plastic surgery is used by some women, particularly those working in the sex industry, to
enhance bust size and exploit ancient male programming. But the ultimate function of the human
breast becomes clear only when an infant is born and lactation begins.
1) Miller, G (2000) The Mating Mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature.
Vintage
2) Moller, AP, Soler, M and Thornhill R (1995) Breast asymmetry, sexual selection, and human
reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology. 16 (3): 207-219
3) Singh, D (1995) Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: Role of breast
asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology. 16 (6): 465-481