INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: FRANCIA C. POLPOL Name of Rater: ANABEL U. PAGALA

Position: TEACHER II Position: MT III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: 4 Date of Review: 2-May-19
Rating Period: MAY 2018 - APRIL 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DUR

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No acceptable
Services Knowledge and knowledge of of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its evidence was
Pedagogy content within and integration within integration within integration within integration within shown
across curriculum and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
teaching areas. areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4

7.5% 5
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable 4

learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as shown
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the other
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 given MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Actual Results
QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
skills. 7.5% 5
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable
Services Environment classroom management management management management evidence was
and Diversity of structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
Learners engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
groups, in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
meanigful with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
exploration, 7.5% 5
discovery and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
hands-on lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported supported by any of evidence was
activities within a by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any the acceptable shown
range of physical 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other MOV
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments.
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Services learner behavior management management management management evidence was
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5% 4
 Learners

Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable
Services learner behavior management management management management evidence was
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
7.5% 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson
4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Actual Results
QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No acceptable
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies shown
Learners appropriate to address learner to address learner to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
gender, needs,
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
experiences. 7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown 4
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was 4
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Actual Results
QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted
7.5% 5

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV
the given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable 4
varied teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Actual Results
QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 5

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable

varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted
7.5% 5
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET (5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was
clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
7.5% submitted submitted 4

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities related related related work/activities that shown
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted 5
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Outs
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory FRANCIA C. POLPOL ANABEL U. PAGALA ALMA C. AD
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Aut
ENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
ANABEL U. PAGALA
MT III
2-May-19

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Rating
Ave Score
E T

5 5.000 0.375

4 4.000 0.3
Rating
Ave Score
E T

5 5.000 0.375

4 4.500 0.337

5 4.500 0.337
5 4.500 0.337
Rating
Ave Score
E T

4 4.000 0.3

4 4.000 0.3
Rating
Ave Score
E T

5 5.000 0.375

4 4.000 0.3
Rating
Ave Score
E T

4 4.5 0.337

5 5 5.000 0.375
Rating
Ave Score
E T

4 4 4 0.3

5 5.000 0.500

Outstanding 4.511
ALMA C. ADONA
Approving Authority
www.depedtambayanph.org
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: FRANCIA C. POLPOL Name of Rater: ANABEL U. PAGALA

Position: TEACHER II Position: MT III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: 4 Date of Review: 2-May-19
Rating Period: MAY 2018 - APRIL 2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 5 5 5.000
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 3 7.5% 5 5 5.000
Objective 4 7.5% 5 4 4.500
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 5 4.500
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4 4.000
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5 5 5.000
Objective 9 7.5% 4 4 4.000
Objective 10 7.5% 5 4 4.500
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 5 5 5.000
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 5.000
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating
FRANCIA C. POLPOL ANABEL U. PAGALA ALMA C. ADONA
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
MMARY SHEET

ANABEL U. PAGALA
MT III
2-May-19

Score

0.375
0.300
0.375
0.337
0.337
0.300
0.300
0.375
0.300
0.337
0.375
0.300
0.500
Outstanding
4.511
 ALMA C. ADONA
Approving Authority
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools – Makati City
Makati V District
PITOGO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Cebu St., Brgy. Pitogo, Makati City
Tel. No.: 882-21-70

CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL (COT) RATING CONSOLIDATION

Teacher Observed: PRINCESS D. FRANCISCO

Rating Period: June 2018-April 2019

1 Applies knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas

COT Rating Sheet COT Rating (Proficient Teacher RPMS 5-point scale

COT Rating Sheet 1 6 4

COT Rating Sheet 2 7 5
COT Rating Sheet 3 7 5
COT Rating Sheet 4 7 5
TOTAL 19
AVERAGE 4.750 5 (Outstanding)

2 Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and
numeracy skills

COT Rating Sheet COT Rating (Proficient Teacher RPMS 5-point scale

COT Rating Sheet 1 6 4

COT Rating Sheet 2 6 4
COT Rating Sheet 3 6 4
COT Rating Sheet 4 6 4
TOTAL 16
AVERAGE 4.000 4 (Very Satisfactory

3 Applies a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as
other higher-order thinking skills

COT Rating Sheet COT Rating (Proficient Teacher RPMS 5-point scale

COT Rating Sheet 1 6 4

COT Rating Sheet 2 6 4
COT Rating Sheet 3 7 5
COT Rating Sheet 4 7 5
TOTAL 18
AVERAGE 4.500 5 (Outstanding)
4
Manages classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful
exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical learning
environments

COT Rating Sheet COT Rating (Proficient Teacher RPMS 5-point scale

COT Rating Sheet 1 6 4

COT Rating Sheet 2
COT Rating Sheet 3
COT Rating Sheet 4
TOTAL
AVERAGE
6 4
7 5
7 5
18
4.500 5 (Outstanding)

5 Manages learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to

ensure learning-focused environments

COT Rating Sheet COT Rating (Proficient Teacher RPMS 5-point scale

COT Rating Sheet 1 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 2
COT Rating Sheet 3
COT Rating Sheet 4
TOTAL
AVERAGE
6 4
7 5
7 5
19
4.750 5 (Outstanding)

6 Uses differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners'

gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences

COT Rating Sheet COT Rating (Proficient Teacher RPMS 5-point scale

COT Rating Sheet 1 6 4

COT Rating Sheet 2
COT Rating Sheet 3 7 5
COT Rating Sheet 4
TOTAL 9
AVERAGE 4.500 5 (Outstanding)

7 Plans, manages and implements developmentally sequenced teaching and learning

processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts

COT Rating Sheet COT Rating (Proficient Teacher RPMS 5-point scale

COT Rating Sheet 1 7 5

COT Rating Sheet 2 6 4
COT Rating Sheet 3 7 5
COT Rating Sheet 4 7 5
 TOTAL 19
AVERAGE 4.750 5 (Outstanding)
 8 Selects, develops, organizes, and uses appropriate teaching and learning resources,
including ICT, to address learning goals

COT Rating Sheet COT Rating (Proficient Teacher RPMS 5-point scale

COT Rating Sheet 1

COT Rating Sheet 2 6 4
COT Rating Sheet 3
COT Rating Sheet 4
TOTAL 4
AVERAGE 4.000 4 (Very Satisfactory

9 Designs, selects, organizes, and uses diagnostic, formative and

summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum
requirements

COT Rating Sheet COT Rating (Proficient Teacher RPMS 5-point scale

COT Rating Sheet 1

COT Rating Sheet 2
COT Rating Sheet 3
COT Rating Sheet 4 6 4
TOTAL 4
AVERAGE 4.000 4 (Very Satisfactory

LEGEND:

COT Rating RPMS 5-point scale RANGE RPMS 5-point Rating Scale

7 5 (Outstanding) 4.500 - 5.000 5 (Outstanding)

6 4 (Very Satisfactory 3.500 - 4.499 4 (Very Satisfactory
5 3 (Satisfactory) 2.500 - 3.499 3 (Satisfactory)
4 2 (Unsatisfactory) 1.500 - 2.499 2 (Unsatisfactory)
3 1 (Poor) below 1.499 1 (Poor)

Observer 1: ALMA C. ADONA Observer 4 GILDA D. GUTLAY

School Head Master Teacher 1

Observer 2: GIRLIE GRACE S. DESUASIDO Observer 5: ANABEL U. PAGALA

Master Teacher 1 Master Teacher 2

Observer 3: REVELYN M. GUILLERMO Observer 6: MERLIE V. REYES

Master Teacher 1 Master Teacher 1