Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Ups: Mythbusting
Contents:
Introduction Introduction…………1
Although in today’s business world many start-up companies are
Myth #1……………….2
often put under pressure to reduce operating costs via the
Myth #2……………….2
outsourced software development by their investors and/or venture
Myth #3……………….3
capitalists (VCs), it is still widely believed that only non-core
Myth#4………………..4
development and/or testing functions can be outsourced to a 3d
Conclusion &
party offshore, nearshore or within home country. Since most of Recommendation..6
outsourcing and continue to pay overheads each time they lose a member on their in-house IT team or
each time they need to fix an error or bug in their application. However, we do believe that the idea that
outsourcing is for huge and mature companies and the non-core development only is a stereotype
which is no longer relevant to the Outsourcing 2.0 domain. There is clear evidence that start-ups can
gain significant long-term benefits from the outsourced development the same way as their bigger
competitors and these benefits can even be greater than those of large multinationals.
A real-life practice shows that this myth works well in the offshoring, but fails within the Nearshoring
context. Locating own development team in a low-cost country nearshore (i.e. within / close to the
same time zone) helps eliminate communication barriers by allowing the same or almost the same
frequency of face-to-face communication as in the case of in-house development. The flight time is very
short and cost is rather low, so your outsourcing manager(s) can visit vendor’s office several times a
week and ensure effective communication with all members on the outsourced team, monitor and track
Myth #2
To be able to establish successful outsourcing relationships,
Many start-uppers believe that hiring or promoting and training managers to deal with the outsourcing
process would require additional spending and creation of a new management layer. As they try to
develop their solutions internally. In real life these steps can easily be avoided with no damage for ITO
engagement. To be able to develop a state-of-the-art product or service within own house requires
competent IT management, so start-ups have to dedicate certain financial resources to have the best IT
/ project manager they can ever find. In the case with outsourcing, it is enough to hire one manager with
extensive ITO experience to lead the process. Nothing changes in the organizational structure and
management hierarchy except that now IT manager will have to manage team located 2 to 4 hours away
from company’s head office. Hiring a good manager to lead the outsourced development will cost the
same as hiring a good manager to lead the in-house development, so no extra costs and management
Myth #3
ITO suppliers tend to win huge projects to provide work to 30 to 50 developers waiting on a bench
(whom they want to retain due to fierce competition in IT headhunting) and do not like to deal with tiny
projects. But it’s only the matter of a business model involved. Many innovative business models such
as, for instance, Own Team Model* are perfect for the start-ups, as they allow them to in-source a single
developer to the vendor’s office located in a lower-cost neighborhood and grow this one-person team to
Myth #4
2010, which is being in progress right now, shows that a growing number
of Western European companies outsourcing their development offshore admit the fact that they pay
overheads, which has a negative impact on their cost reduction strategy. But again, it’s only the matter
of the business model involved. It is indeed critical for start-up companies to control their software
development budgets. To do so in outsourcing, you should try to find a partner offering transparent
pricing structures.
Let’s look at the main scenarios why buyers pay overheads in traditional business models such as, e.g.,
o Vendor loses one or more team members involved in your project and charges you an extra bill
for staff replacement and the hiring process associated with it.
o Vendor needs to upgrade its infrastructure and charges you and other clients a “little” sum of
Our Mythbusting shows that start-ups do have a good chance to leverage costs and develop an
unsurpassed solution via outsourcing. However, they should be very careful selecting an outsourcing
destination and partner, as not all traditional business models fit their sourcing strategy. Here are some
of the recommendations that start-up companies may consider while making their outsourcing
decisions:
• take some time and resources to hire a competent IT manager with an extensive outsourcing
• hire a consultancy to help you select an outsourcing destination and suggest on appropriate ITO
vendors (but always consider outsourcing nearshore to ensure minimal time, distance and
cultural differences);
• send your RFP to several vendors in several low-cost regions, then narrow your selection to the
ones matching your requirements and challenge them to prove their expertise (make them
complete a pilot project for free or call their past and current clients to ask for references);
• make sure the contract to be signed offers a pricing structure as transparent as possible;
• start your outsourcing relationship with few developers on the outsourced team and grow your
• make sure it is you, not your vendor, who has 100% managerial control of your team members’
compensation and retention. The vendor should only act as your recruitment agent and space
• make your personnel on the outsourced team feel like part of your company, share your
business mission and vision with them and involve in decision making. It will eventually help you
you’ve managed to make the right sourcing decisions and have got a chance to develop your own
development team in the ways which best meet your business needs and challenges.
IT Sourcing Europe Ltd is a UK-based research and consultancy company specializing in nearshore
IT/software development Outsourcing. Our services include: