Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Wiley’s CFA ®
Program Level II
Smartsheets
Fundamentals For CFA Exam Success
WCID184
Multiple Regression and Issues in Regression Analysis
QUANTITATIVE METHODS
Multiple regression equation Time‐Series Analysis
• The ˆ variance
b j ± (tc × sbˆ ) of the error term is the same for all observations. where: • Linear trend model: predicts that the dependent variable
I. Professionalism • The error term is uncorrelated across observations. A series that grows exponentially can be described using the following equation:
j
yt = the value
Linear Trend grows of the
Models bytime a constant
series at time amount
t (value ofinthe each period
dependent variable)
A. Knowledge of the Law • The Multiple
error term
estimated is Regression
regressionnormally distributed.
coefficient ±and Issues
(critical in Regression
t -value)(coefficient standard error) where:
Analysis b0 = the y‐intercept b + b t term
ybt ==the y = e
thevalue of the time series at time t (value of the dependent variable)
0 1
t
slope
y = bcoefficient
+ b t + ε , t = 1 , 2 , . . . , T
B. Independence and Objectivity Multiple
Hypothesis regression
tests on equation regression Coefficients
1
b0==time =1,
t
the y‐intercept 0
2, 3, …
1term t
,T
Multipletregression and issues in regression analysis
C. Misrepresentation F‐statistic• Hypothesis test on each regression coefficient: use n – bwhere: 1 = the slope coefficient
The test statistic for each regression coefficient is calculated as:
(k+1)
Multiple degrees
regressionof freedom
equation = Yi = b0 + b1 X1i + b2 X 2ii + . . . + bk X ki + εMultiple , i =
where:
1
tyWe
,
=
t2= ,
time
. the
take
regression. . ,
•
n
=1,
value
the
and
Log-linear
2, 3,
of the
natural
issues
…
in
T trend
,logarithm
time
regression series ofat
analysis
model:
timesides
both predicts
t (value of theof the thattothe
dependent
equation dependent
variable)
arrive at the equation for the
D. Misconduct Multiple MSR Regression RSS / k and Issues in Regression Analysis
i
t0==the
yblog‐linear thevalue variable
y‐intercept
model: of the term exhibits
time series atexponential time t (value ofgrowth the dependent variable)
F -stat = = bWe
b 01 == the
take
the y‐intercept
the METHODS
slope natural
coefficient term
logarithm of both sides of the equation to arrive at the equation for the
II. Integrity of Capital Markets MSE SSE /[n − ( k + 1)]
Estimated regression coefficient − Hypothesized value of regression coefficient QUANTITATIVE
Multiple Yi =t-stat Multiple
regression
the =ith observation Regression
equation of the and
dependent
Standard
Issues
error ofvariable
regression
in Regression Analysis
Y coefficient t 1==time
blog‐linear the slope
lnmodel:
=1, yt2,=coefficient/trend
3,b0…+,bT1t + εt , t coefficient = 1,2, . . . , T
A. Material Nonpublic Information Xji = the ith observation of the independent variable Xj, j = 1,2,…, k t = time, the independent or explanatory variable
Results from Regression with Two Independent Variables ε = a ln
random‐error y = b + b
term t + ε , t = 1,2, .sides . . , T of the equation to arrive at the equation for the
B. Market Manipulation
Multiple
2
R andb0Adjusted regression
=Multiple
the intercept 2 equation
Rregression equation= Yi = b0 + b1 X1i + b2 X 2ii + . . . + bk X ki + εi , i = 1We
of theequation ,t2, .take. . ,•
nthe natural logarithm (AR)
Autoregressive
t 0 1 t of both time series model: uses past values
b1, . . .,• bkp-value:
= btheˆ − slope
j bj
lowest
coefficients
Estimated level
regression for ofeach significance
of the−independent
Coefficient
coefficient Hypothesized at which
Standard variables
value errorwe can AuTOREgRESSIVE
t‐Statisticlog‐linear model: (AR) TIME‐SERIES MODELS
III. Duties to Clients t=
εi =reject
= Log‐Linear Trend Models of the dependent variable to predict its current value
the
Multiple serror
Total
bˆ j
the term null
regression for
variation hypothesis
the
− ith
equation
Coefficient
Unexplained =
observation
Y = that
standard
i b
b0
+ b the
error
variation X of
1 1i SST +population
b b
j2 −X +
2ii SSE
sbˆ . . . + b value
RSS X
k ki + ε of
, i = 1 , 2 , . . . , n
bi 0 sbˆ AuTOREgRESSIVE (AR) TIME‐SERIES MODELS
x• t y=tFirst-order
=b0b+ 0 + b1bx1tt−1++εtεAR = 1,2, . . . , T
Intercept2 ln ,t t model
Yni =Rthe= number ith observation of the dependent0 variable
of observations =Y =
theindependent
regression coefficient
variation is b1 zero in a two-tailed SSTtest b(the
0 0
εi = thecan
Observations error term for the that the population value of the coefficient is zero, inyt = the value
n observation
ith xt = of b0 the + b1QM time
xt −1 +series b2 xt − 2at+…+ timeterms tb(value do
of the not exhibitvariable)
dependent serial
we reject the null hypothesis p xt − p + ε t
E. Preservation of Confidentiality Residual
Confidence n =Termand
a the reject
number
Intervals
two‐sided ofnull
test. hypothesis if F-statistic > Fcrit)
observations bA0 pth = the y‐intercept
order correlation
autoregressive term model andErrors heteroskedasticity
is represented in order to be used
Testing anoVa Detecting Serially Correlated in an ARas: Model
• forThe Heteroskedasticity‐ The Breusch‐Pagan (BP) Test
for statistical
IV. Duties to Employers lower the p‐value, the weaker the case for the null hypothesis. b 1 = the slope coefficient Estimatedinference. residual autocorrelation
ResidualSource ˆ i = Yof
εTerm i − Yi =
ˆ degrees of Sum
Yi − (bˆ0 + Squares
of
bˆ1 X1i + bˆ2of
Mean Sum ˆ
i + . . . + bk X ki )
X 2Squares t = time =1, 2, t-stat3, … =,T
SignificanceDetectingxtSerially b0 + bCorrelated Errors binpautocorrelation
xan AR
forεtModel
A. Loyalty
Variation
χbˆ2j =± nR(tc 2×with
Freedom
sbˆ ) k degrees of freedom.
F
• =t-test
t-stat =
xResidual
for
1Standard + b2 xerror
t −1 serial +…+
2(auto)
t −autocorrelation
of the t− p +
correlation lag of the error
εˆ i = Yi − Yˆi k= Yi − (bˆ0 + RSS bˆ1 X1i + bˆ2MSR X 2i +=.RSS. . + /bˆkk X ki ) terms Stand ■(model
dard errorofis correctly
ofbothresidual specified
autocorrelation if all the error
j
Regression MSR/MSE p‐value We take the natural logarithm Standard error sides
= 1 /of the
T equation to arrive at the equation for the
B. Additional Compensation Arrangements estimated regression coefficient ± (critical t -value)(coefficient tiMe‐series standard
analysis error)
log‐linear t-stat =
Residual autocorrelation for lag
Confidence
n = Number Intervals of observations. Detecting model: autocorrelations
Serially StandCorrelated
■
dard T error
= Number Errors
of are of in
residual not an significantly
observations
AR Model
autocorrelation different from 0)
C. Responsibilities of Supervisors Residual n − (k + 1) SSE MSE
R2 = Coefficient of determination of the second regression (the regression when the squared
= SSE /n − (k + 1) tiMe‐series
analysis where: ■ T − 2 = Degrees of freedom
Confidence Intervals Standardln error yt = of + b1t + εtautocorrelation
b0 residual , t = 1,2, . . . , T=1/ T
V. Investment Analysis, Recommendations, and Actions F‐statistic residualstotal ofˆ the original
b ± (tc × sbˆ )
n − 1regression SStare regressed on the independent variables).
where:
Mean
TMean= Number Reversion
t-stat
Residual autocorrelation
of=observations in the time series
for lag
24 k = Numberj of independent variables. © 2018 WileyStandard reversion Stand dard autocorrelation
error of residual=1/ autocorrelation
error of residual T
j
Analysis of MSE
variance SSE /[
(ANOVA) n −provides
( k + 1)]±the(critical all the error)7rise where: when PMit
1b−0below
lies b1 its mean.
Clients c03.indd 24
© Wiley 2018 estimated
all rights regression
reserved. coefficient
any unauthorized copyingrequired tinformation
or distribution to test whether
-value)(coefficient
will constitute
slope coefficients in a regression simultaneously equal zero. The F‐test is used to conduct the Standard xerror
standard
an infringement of copyright.March 2018 5:41 x
tt = = 1bof 0− + εt 5
b1 xt −1 + autocorrelation
F‐statistic bresidual
1
=1/ T
C. Record Retention • following
R2 and Adjusted R2
Standard hypothesis test:
error of the estimate (SEE) =QM√MSE using MSE Multiperiod T = Number of observations in the time series
© Wiley 2018 all rights Forecasts reserved. and anythe Chain bcopying
unauthorized Rule of Forecasting
or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
Hfrom0 : b1 = bthe = …ANOVA table 0
the=Chain xist =represented
F‐statistic 2 MSR = b k = 0 RSS /k A pth order Mean autoregressive
reverting model
level as:
VI. Conflicts of Interests HFa:-statAt least = one slope = coefficient does not equal zero
Multiperiod
© Wiley 2018 all rights
Forecasts
reserved.
and
any unauthorized 1Rule b1 of orForecasting
−copying distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
A. Disclosure of Conflicts • Coefficient
R 2 = MSR
MSE
Total variation of determination
SSE /[ n − ( k +
RSS / kthe F‐test
1 )]
− Unexplained variation (higherSST
=
R −indicates
2
SSE RSSa higher
= xxˆt +=1 =b b+0 +
ˆ ˆ
b bx1 xt + b x +…+ b p xt − p + εt
information
F -stat = required
proportion to perform
=ofTotalthe vtotal variation in dependent variable All covariance xˆtt+1 = 0bˆ0 + 1bˆ1tx−t1 2 t − 2
B. Priority of Transactions MSE SSE /[n − ( k + 1)]
ariation SST SST • Random stationary walk time is seriesa specialhave a finite AR(1) model that
mean‐reverting is not
level. An AR(1) time series
R2 and Adjusted explained
• Number R2 ofby the independent
observations (n). variables) ©will
RandomWileyhave 2018Walks aallfinite
rights mean‐reverting
covariance reserved. any unauthorized
stationary level, copying
as(undefined
long or distribution
as the absolute will
meanconstitute anofinfringement
reverting
level of copyright. (b1)
the laglevel)
coefficient
C. Referral Fees • Total number of regression coefficients (k + 1). Detecting
Random Serially
Walks Correlated Errors in an AR Model
• Sum of squared errors on residuals (SSE or total unexplained variation). is less than one.
R2 and Adjusted R 2
n − 1 xt = xt −1 + εt Residual , E(εt ) = 0, 2
E(2εt ) = σ 2
, E(εt εlag
VII. Responsibilities as a CFA Institute Member or CFA sum=of1−squares SST − SSE RSS s ) = 0 if t ≠ s
Total 2 2 2
• Regression
Adjusted R variation
=R −Unexplained
(RSS or (1 variation
− Rexplained
total ) variation).
autocorrelation
nd regression R2 = n − k − 1 = = The chain xt rule
t-stat = x= t −of1 +forecasting
εt , E(εt ) = 0,is E(usedεt ) =toσmake 2
, E(εfort ε s ) = 0 if t ≠ forecasts.
multi‐period s The next period’s value
Candidate Total variation
Total variation − Unexplained variation SST − SSE RSS
SST SST
(which is• predicted Stand dard
by theerrorforecast of residual equation) autocorrelation
is used as an input to to
the make
equationitto determine
R = 2
= = The first difference First difference
of the ahead. of
randomMulti‐period a random
walk equation walk
is givenare in order
as:more
A. Conduct as Participants in CFA Institute Programs TotalThe variation
Breusch‐Pagan (BP) TestSST SST the value
The first difference of two periods
of the random walk equation is given as: forecasts uncertain than single period
Correlation and Regression Testing for Heteroskedasticity‐ forecasts. covariance stationary (mean reverting level of 0)
where:
B. Reference to CFA Institute, the CFA Designation, • Adjusted
Adjusted2 R 2 QUANTITATIVE 2 METHODS
R = R = 1− n −1 2 Standard error y = x − x = x
of residual autocorrelation =1/ T + ε − x = ε , E( ε ) = 0, E( ε 2
) = σ 2
, E( ε ε ) = 0 for t ≠ s
(1 − R ) ytt = xtt − xtt−−11 = xt −t −11+ εt t− xt −t1−1= εt ,t E(εt ) t= 0, E(εt2 ) t= σ 2 , E(εt ε s t) =s 0 for t ≠ s
and the CFA Program χ2 = nR2 with k degrees of k − 1
n −freedom. TComparing
= Number ofForecast
observations Model in Performance
the time series
n 2 2 n −1 2
Adjusted R = R = 1 − (1 − R )
Uses of Correlation
Sample covariance = Cov(X,Y) = ∑ (X i − X)(Yi − Y)/(n − 1)
analysis n − k − 1 • Walk AR(1) model hasforecast a uniterror root if the slope
n = Number of observations. The Breusch‐Pagan (BP) Test
Random
The smaller
Random Walk thewithwith
variance a Drift
a Drift of the from a model, the coefficient
more accurate the model and
QUANTITATIVE METHODS
i =1 Testing for Heteroskedasticity‐
• Investment analysis. 2
R = Coefficient of determination of the second regression (the regression when the squared the smaller equals the standard 1, e.g.,error of a random
the time series walk. regression.
x == bb0 ++bb1xxt −1++εεt
• Identifying appropriate benchmarks in the evaluation of portfolio manager residuals Testing for of2Heteroskedasticity‐
the original regression
χ = nR2 with k degrees Theofare regressed on (BP)
Breusch‐Pagan
freedom.
the independent
Test variables). • xbtt Dickey-Fuller
0 1 t −1 t test indicates that a time series has a unit
where: performance. k = Number of independent variables. Violations of Regression © Wiley 2018
• In‐sample
ball ==rights
1,
forecasts
≠≠the
1, bb0reserved. 0,or
0,
are made using observations from the data used to estimate the
orany unauthorized
analysis,copying oris
distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
n = sample Correlation and Regression
size © 2018
• Identifying appropriate avenues for effective diversification of investment portfolios.χ2 = nR2 with k degrees of freedom. Wiley model. 11 root 25For0 if
time null
series hypothesis in‐sample not rejected.
forecasts use data from within the test
nd regressionXi = •
ith observation
Evaluating of theVariable X Assumptions x
•
xt == bb0 ++xxt −1++εεt, ,E(
period.
E(εε)t )==00
(1 independent variable) Seasonality −
appropriateness of using other measures (e.g., net income) as n= Number of observations.
proxies t 0 t 1 t
in t
AR models: the seasonal autocorrelation
X = meanfor observation of Variable X
cash flow in financial statement analysis. R 2 = Coefficient of determination of the second regression (the regression when the squared • Out‐of‐sample forecasts are made using data from outside the test period. These
Υ (or big data). © Wiley 2018 all rights reserved. any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. forecasts of2018the 5:41 PM error term
are used to evaluate 5 willhow bewell significantly
the estimateddifferent model holds fromup outside the
Yi = •
ith observation
Analysis ofoflarge Variable •
n = 25Number of observations.
c03.indd 7 March
data sets residuals Heteroskedascity:
of the original regressionvariance are regressed ofonerror term is not
the independent constant The
variables). The first‐difference
first‐difference 0 (can of ofthe
be therandom
randomwalk
solved walkwith
by witha adrift
introducing driftequation
equation
a is is
seasonal given
given as:as:
lag in the
Y = mean • Sample
Confidence Intervalcorrelation
observation of Variable
for Y coefficient
a Regression Coefficient
2
kR ==Number
Coefficient of determination
of independent variables. of the second regression (the regression when the squared period used to develop the model.
testing the Significance of the Correlation Coefficient residuals of • Unconditional:
the original regression heteroskedasticity
are regressed on the independent is not related variables). to ytt ==model). xxtt −− xxtt−−11,,yyt t ==bb00++εεt ,t ,b0b0≠≠0 0
k = Number the independent
of independent variables. variables (does not affect statistical The out‐of‐sample forecasting performance of forecasting models is evaluated by comparing
b n ± tC sb their •
root ARCH
mean squared models: errorused (RMSE), to determine
which is the square whether root ofthe the variance
average squared error.
To test whether the correlation
nn between
Sample correlation coefficient = r = two Cov(X,Y)is significantly different from©zero:
variables Wiley 2018 allinference).
rights reserved. any unauthorized QM copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
of the error in one 5 period depends on the variance
s X sY The
The unit Root
Root Testof Test ofNonstationarity
Nonstationarity
H0 : ρ = 0 • Conditional: heteroskedasticity is correlated with
© Wiley 2018 all rights reserved. any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
• The of the smaller error the RMSE,in previous 5 the more periods
accurate (if theARCH
model as errors are tool.
a forecasting
F-Statistic
Ha : ρ ≠ 0 the independent variables (causes F-test for overall found,
xxtt == bb00 ++buse b11xxt −t −11generalized
++εεt t least squares to correct for
• Testing the significance of the correlation coefficient significance of the regression and t-test for the instability of regression Coefficients
Mean regression sumnof squares RSS / k MSR heteroskedasticity)
xxt −− xxt −1 ==bb0 ++bb1 xxt −1 −−xxt −1 ++εtε
=
FSample variance = sX2 = ∑ (X i − X)2 =/(nSSE
− 1)/ [ n − ( k + 1)] = MSE significance of each regression coefficient to become In determining t t −1 0 1 t −1 t −1 t
Mean squared error
r n − 2 i =1 • Regression
xxt −− xxt −which = b +model
t −11 = b00 + (b
(with
b1 −−1)to
1 1) x
xtwo −1 ++εtime
tchoose,
t −1 tε t
the series:
stability of use thethe Dickey-Fuller
regression coefficients must also be
Test-stat = t =
2
unreliable). considered. test
t
xxt −− xxtto −1 == determine
bb0 ++gg1 xxt −1 ++εεtwhether the independent variable and
1− r t t −1 0 1 t −1 t
where k = the number of slope coefficients (b values) • Serial correlation: regression errors are correlated the dependent variable have a unit root
• Using longer time periods brings greater statistical reliability, but there is a greater chance
n = Number of observations
rSample
= Sample deviation = sX = sX2
correlation
standard
across observations (could be positive or negative and Seasonality Seasonality
• Ifunderlying
that neitherfundamentals of the timemay series has a unit
have changed over the root,
longer linear
time period. Judgment
ANOVA Table
n – 2 = Degrees of freedom has same effect on statistical inference as conditional andregression experience play can an important
be usedrole tointest determining how to model a time series.
the relationships
Source of Variation Degrees of Freedom Sum of Squares Mean Sum of Squares heteroskedasticity) xt = b0 + b1 xt −1 + b2 xt − n + εt
xt = between
b + b 1 t −1 the
x + b 2 two
x + εtime series.
• Standard error of the estimate (smaller SEE indicates as sample QUANTITATIVE METHODS
0 t −n t
Test
The statistic
value of sample correlation (r) required to reject the null hypothesis decreases RSS RSS • Multicollinearity: two or more independent variables
Regression better fit of regression
(explained) k model) RSS MSR = = = RSS Where n =• number If either of periods of them in thehas seasonal a unit patternroot, linear regression
size (n) increases: k 1 (or combinations of independent variables) are highly Where n = number 36
cannot of periods
be used in the asseasonal
resultspattern may be spurious. © 2018 Wiley
−2 correlated
• As n increases, rthendegrees
=n t = ˆ 2nˆ − (k2 +
Test-stat of1/2
freedom also increase,
1) n
1/2
2 SSE
which results in the absolute
MSE =
SSE • If both of them have unit roots and if they are
∑ (Y(ti crit
Error (unexplained)
critical value − 1b) 0−for
−r bthe
1 X i test ∑ (εˆ i )
) falling. n−2 • Makes regression coefficients inaccurate and t-test cointegrated, the regression coefficients and standard
• The
SEEabsolute
= i =1 value of the numerator = i(in
=1 calculating
the test statistic) increases with for the significance of each regression coefficient
c03.indd 36 7 March 2018
Total higher values of nn,−which
2 nresults n − 2t‐values.
− 1 inhigher SST errors will be consistent and they can be used to
unreliable.
Where:
8 © Wiley 2018
exCerpt froM “probabilistiC Allconduct
Rights
approaChes: Reserved.
sCenario
hypothesis
AnydeCision
analysis, unauthorized tests.
copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
trees, and siMulation”
= Number of observations
nNote:
k = the number of slope coefficients in the regression. • Difficult to isolate the impact of each independent
8 © Wiley 2018 All Rights Reserved. Any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
r = Sample correlation
variable on the dependent variable. Risk Types
Excerpt and Probabilistic
from “Probabilistic Approaches: Scenario Analysis,
• • All
Prediction
other factorsinterval
constant,around
a false null the predicted
hypothesis (H0: ρvalue
= 0) isof thelikely to be
more
Predictiondependent
the Coefficient
Intervals
rejected of we
as variable
determination
increase the sample size. • Model specification errors Approaches Decision Trees, and Simulation”
Linear Regression with One Independent Variable
• The smaller the size of the sample, the greater the value of sample correlation required • Misspecified functional form (omitting important Table 2-1: Risk Types and Probabilistic Approaches
The coefficient
to rejectofthe determination
null hypothesis (R2)oftells
zerouscorrelation.
how well the independent variable explains
• When
the variation =
2 inthe
sRegression
s
1 ( X − X)2
1 + +
2therelation
dependent variable.
between two It measures
variables is the fraction
very strong, of
a the total
false nullvariation in
hypothesis the
variables; variables may need to be transformed; Discrete/ Correlated/ Sequential/
model equation = Yi = b0 + b1 X i + εi , i = 1,…
…, n Continuous Independent Concurrent Risk Approach
dependent
f
n isbe
: ρ =0) that
(H0variable may −rejected
1)sx2 with
(nexplained by the independent
a relatively variable.
small sample size. pooling data incorrectly).
QM
Discrete Independent Sequential Decision tree %
• With large sample sizes, even relatively small correlation coefficients can be • Time-series misspecification (including lagged Discrete Correlated Concurrent Scenario analysis
Calculating the Coefficient
significantly differentoffrom
determination
zero. Continuous Either Either Simulations
• b1 ˆand b0 are the regression coefficients.
Y ± tc s f
dependent variables as independent variables in
• b1 is2 the slope coefficient. regressions when there is serial correlation of errors;
1. R = r 2
• b0 is the intercept term.
The coefficient of determination equals the correlation coefficient squared. This
• ε is the error term that represents the variation in the dependent variable that is not
calculation only works in linear regression i.e., when there is only one independent
explained by the independent variable.
variable.
Wiley © 2019
Explained variation Total variation − Unexplained variation
2
© Wiley
2. 2018 All = Reserved. Any unauthorized
RRights = copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
Total variation Total variation
Wiley’s CFA Program Exam Review
®
© 13
© Wiley
Wiley 2018
2018 all
all rights
rights reserved.
reserved. any
any unauthorized
unauthorized copying
copying or
or distribution
distribution will
will constitute
constitute an
an infringement
infringement of
of copyright.
copyright. 13
suppliers, customers, and
competitors.
• Company site visits (e.g., to
production facilities or retail
• Joint ventures (shared control): use equity method • IFRS: current service costs, past service costs and Integrated
6. Follow‐up.
Financial Statement
• Information gathered by
periodically repeating above
• Update reports and
recommendations.
• Business combinations (controlling interest): use net interest expense/income recognized in P&L Analysis steps as necessary to determine
• All assets (at fair value), liabilities (at fair value), • US GAAP: current service costs, interest expense, • ROE decomposition necessary.
(extended DuPont analysis)
revenues and expenses of acquiree are combined with expected return on plan assets, amortization of past DuPont Analysis
Capital Budgeting
Assumption Net Pension Liability (Asset) Pension Cost and Pension Expense NWCInvafter‐tax
Annual = ΔNon‐cash current
operating cashassets
flows−(CF)
ΔNon‐debt current liabilities
statement to reflect proportionate share in acquiree’s Annual after‐tax operating cash flows (CF)
Higher discount rate Lower obligation Pension cost and pension expense will
net assets and net income that belongs to minority CF = (S −CC−−D)D)
both typically be lower because of lower Annual after‐tax
CF = (S −operating
− +t) D
(l t)
(l −cash
+ Dor (CF)
flows orCF =CF = (S − C) (l − t) + tD
(S − C) (l − t) + tD
shareholders. opening obligation and lower service • Initial investment outlay
costs. TerminalCF = after‐tax
year (S − C − D) (l − t) + D cash
non‐operating or CF flow=(TNOCF):
(S − C) (l − t) + tD
• Full goodwill method: goodwill equals the excess • New investment
Terminal year after‐tax non‐operating cash flow (TNOCF):
Higher rate of Higher obligation Higher service and interest costs will
of total fair value of acquiree over fair value of its compensation increase periodic pension cost and
TNOCF
TerminalTNOCF ==Sal
Sal
year after‐tax
TT + NWCInv
NWCInv − t (−Sal
+ non‐operating − BV
t (cash
Sal
Capital
T −TBV
T flow T)
) Budgeting
(TNOCF):
identifiable net assets. increase pension expense. Initial investment for a new investment = FCInv + NWCInv
TNOCF
Expansion = Sal + NWCInv − t (Sal T − BVT )
Project
Replacement Project
Replacement ProjectT
• Partial goodwill method: goodwill equals the excess Higher expected No effect, because fair value Not applicable for IFRS.
• Replacement project
of purchase price over fair value of the acquirer’s return on plan of plan assets are used on
Intercorporate Investmentsbalance sheet
assets
No effect on periodic pension cost under Investment outlays:
U.S. GAAP.
Initial investment
Replacement
Investment outlay for a new investment = FCInv + NWCInv
Project
outlays:
proportionate share of acquiree’s identifiable net Lower periodic pension expense under Initial investment for a replacement project = FCInv + NWCInv − Sal 0 + t(Sal 0 − BV0 )
U.S. GAAP. NWCInvInitial
Investment = outlays:
ΔNon‐cash current
investment for a assets − ΔNon‐debt
replacement = FCInvliabilities
project current + NWCInv − Sal 0 + t(Sal 0 − BV0 )
assets.
Adjusted Values Upon Reclassification of Sale of Receivables:
Annual• after‐tax
Annual after-tax a operating cash=flows
FCInv (CF)
Annual after‐tax operating cash flow:
• Goodwill is not amortized
CFO Lower
but subject to annual Annual after‐tax
Initial operating
investment
operating cash
for
cash flows (CF) project
replacement
flow: + NWCInv − Sal 0 + t(Sal 0 − BV0 )
CFFimpairment test. Higher Multinational Operations CF = (S − C) (l − t) + tD
CF = (S − C − D) (l − t) + D or CF = (S − C) (l − t) + tD
Total cash flow Same Annual after‐tax
CF = (S operating
− C) (l − t)cash
+ tDflow:
• Difference between IFRS and US GAAP: IFRS permits full Terminal year after‐tax non‐operating cash flow:
Current assets
and
Current
Higher
partial goodwill methods
liabilities Higher (US GAAP requires use of • For independent subsidiary • CF
Terminal
Terminal
year after‐taxyear
Terminal
= after‐tax
year
non‐operating
(S − C) (l non‐operating
tD
cash
− t) +after-tax
cash
flow (TNOCF): cash flows (TNOCF)
non-operating
flow:
TNOCF = Sal T + NWCInv − t (Sal T − BT )
fullratio
Current goodwill method).Lower • Local currency (LC) = functional currency (FC) ≠ TNOCF = Sal T + NWCInv − t (Sal T − BVT )
(Assuming it was greater than 1) TerminalTNOCF year after‐tax= Sal T non‐operating
+ NWCInv − t (cash − BT )
Sal T flow:
• Impact of different accounting methods on financial parent’s presentation currency (PC). Mutually Exclusive Projects with Unequal Lives
ratios • Use current rate method to translate accounts from Mutually Replacement
1. • Least
TNOCF
Inflation Project
Exclusive
= Sal
CommonProjects
+
reduces
T NWCInv
Multiple with of the
−
Lives
t (Sal
value
Unequal T −B
Approach ofT )depreciation tax savings: if
Lives
Impact of Different Accounting Methods on Financial Ratios
LC to PC. inflation
Investment outlays: is higher (lower) than expected, the profitability
Equity Method Acquisition Method
• Income statement at average rate. Mutually
1. LeastInExclusive
ofthis approach,
Common
the Projects
project Multiple
will with
both projects of Unequal
beLivesare repeated
lower Lives
Approach until their “chains” extend over the same
(higher)
time horizon. Given equal time horizons, the NPVs of the two project chains are
than expected
Initial investment for a replacement project = FCInv + NWCInv − Sal 0 + t(Sal 0 − BV0 )
Leverage Better (lower) as liabilities are
lower and equity is the same
Worse (higher) as liabilities are
higher and equity is the same
• Assets and liabilities at current rate. 1. • Least
Mutually
compared
In this Common and exclusive
approach, theMultiple
project
both ofprojects
with
projects the are
Lives higher
Approachwith
chain NPV
repeated unequal
until istheir
chosen. lives extend over the same
“chains”
time horizon. Given equal time horizons, the NPVs of the two project chains are
• Capital stock at historical rate. Annual •
2. Equivalent Least
after‐tax
this common
operating
Annual
approach, Annuity
both multiple
cashprojects
flow:
Approach are of
(EAA) lives
compared and the project with the higher chain NPV is chosen. extend over the same
In repeated approach:
until their “chains” choose
Net Profit Better (higher) as sales are lower Worse (lower) as sales are higher
Margin and net income is the same and net income is the same • Dividends at rate when declared. time
This
project
approach
with
Givenhigher
horizon.calculates equal time
the annuity
NPV.horizons,
payment the NPVs
(equal annualof payment)
the two project
over thechains are
project’s
CF = (S − C) (l − t) + tD
• Translation gain/loss included in equity under • Equivalent
compared
2. Equivalent
life and the Annuity
Annual
that is equivalent project
annual
in present with
Approach
valuethe(PV)
annuity higher
(EAA)
to chain
(EAA)
the NPV NPV.
approach:
project’s is chosen.
Thechoose
project with the
ROE Better (higher) as equity is lower Worse (lower) as equityemployeeis higher compensatIon: post‐employment and share‐based higher EAA is chosen.
and net income is the same and net income is the same cumulative translation adjustment (CTA). Terminal year
2. Equivalent
This project
after‐tax
approach with
Annual higher
non‐operating
Annuity
calculates the EAA
Approach
annuity (annuity
cash flow: (EAA) (equal
payment payment annualover payment) theover the project’s
SML lifeproject’s that is equivalent life with in presentsame NPV
value (PV) astoproject’s
the project’s NPV).
NPV. The project with the
ROA Better (higher) as net income is Worse (lower) as net income is
• Exposure = net assets. TNOCF
This =
approachSal + NWCInv
isT calculates
− t (
the annuitySal T − B )
payment
T (equal annual payment) over the project’s
Reconciliation of the Pension the same Obligation:
and assets are lower the same and assets are higher • For well-integrated subsidiary • Rhigher
Capital EAA[E(R
i = R F + β irationing:
chosen.
M ) − R F ] if budget is fixed, use NPV or
life that is equivalent in present value (PV) to the project’s NPV. The project with the
Mutuallyhigher
SML profitability
Exclusive EAA Projects
is chosen.index with (PI)Unequal to rank Lives projects
Pension obligation at the beginning of the period • LC ≠ FC = PC. Ri = Required return for project or asset i
+ Current service costs • RProject
RF = Risk‐free i =R
ofdiscount
returnM ) − Rrate
F + β i [E(R
rate
Multiple Fof] Lives Approach
using CAPM
Accounting
+ Interest costs for Defined Benefit employee compensatIon:• post‐employment Use temporal method to translate accounts from LC SML
and share‐based 1. Least Common
βi = Beta of project or asset i
Pension Plans
+ Past service costs to PC.
employee compensatIon: post‐employment and share‐based [E(R )
Ri = Required
− R ] = Market
approach,
risk
M R i F= R F + β i [E(R M ) − R F ]
In thisreturn
premium
both projects
for project or assetare i repeated until their “chains” extend over the same
+ Actuarial losses © Wiley 2018 all rights reserved. any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. 23
Reconciliation of the Pension Obligation: • Monetary assets and liabilities at current rate. RF = Risk‐freetime horizon.
rate of returnGiven equal time horizons, the NPVs of the two project chains are
− Actuarial gains
• Pension obligation components Capital Budgeting Rii == Beta
β • Real
Required
compared
of project options:
return orfor
and the
asset timing,
projecti or with
project sizing
assetthe i higher(abandonment
chain NPV is chosen. and
Reconciliation of the Pension
− Benefits paid Obligation:
Pension obligation at the beginning of the period
• Nonmonetary assets and liabilities at historical rate. [E(R −expansion),
= MRisk‐free
R©FWiley )2018 =rate
RallF]RightsMarketof return
Reserved. flexibility,
any
risk unauthorized
premiumcopying fundamental
or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
Pension obligation at the end of the period
Pension obligation
+ Current serviceat the beginning of the period
costs • Capital stock at historical rate. βi =2.BetaEquivalent
Economic
of projectAnnual
• Economic
Income
or assetAnnuity
income
i Approach (EAA)
+ Current
+ Interest service
costscosts [E(R M) − RF] = Market risk premium
The fair value of assets
+ Interest costsheld
+ Past service
in the pension trust (plan) will increase as a result of:
costs
• Revenues and expenses at average rate, except for This approach calculates the annuity payment (equal annual payment) over the project’s
• A+positive actual dollar return earned on plan assets; and expenses related to nonmonetary assets (e.g. COGS, © Wiley 2018life Economic income = After‐tax operating cash flow + Change in market value
Past service
+ Actuarial costs
losses allthat
EconomicRightsisincome
equivalent
Reserved. =any
in presentcopying
unauthorized
After‐tax
value (PV)
operating cashorflow
to thewill
distribution
+ (Ending
project’s
constitute NPV. The project
an infringement
market value − Beginning
with the
of copyright.
• Contributions
+ Actuarial made by the employer to the plan.
losses higher EAA is chosen. Capital StRuCtuRe
− Actuarial gains depreciation) which are translated at historical rates. market value)
− Actuarial
− Benefits gains
paid will decrease as a result of: © Wiley 2018 Cross‐Reference
all Rights Reserved. any unauthorized to CFA copyingInstitute
or distributionAssigned
will constituteReading #22of copyright.
an infringement
The fair value of plan
− Benefits
Pensionpaid
paid assets
obligation at the end of the period
• Dividends at rate when declared. SML OR
• Pension
Benefits obligation to employees.
at the end of the period Economic income = After‐tax operating cash flow − (Beginning market value − Ending
• Translation gain/loss reported in income statement. the Capital i =R
Rmarket F + β i [E(R
Structure
value) M ) − RF ]
decision
The fair value of assets held in pension
the pension trust (plan) will increase as a result of:
The • value
Reconciliation
fair Fair of
ofvalue the
assets Fair
held
of plan Value of Plan
in the assets Assets:
trust (plan) will increase as a result of: • Exposure = net monetary asset or liability.
• • A A positive
positive actual
actual dollar
dollar return
return earnedearned on plan
on plan assets; assets;
and and R =
Economic income = After‐tax cash flows − Economic depreciation
Required return for
Ai company’s capital structure refers project or asset to thei combination of debt and equity capital it uses to
• • Contributions
Contributions
Fair value of made made
plan by employer
byassets
the theatemployer to thetoplan.
the beginning the plan.
of the period • Net asset (liability) exposure and appreciating foreign Rfinance F = Risk‐free
itsEconomic
business.rate ofThe return goal is to determine the capital structure that results in the minimum
+ Actual return on plan assets currency = translation gain (loss) β
Economic• Profit profit
The fair value of plan assets will decrease as a result of:plan i = Beta of
weighted projectcost
average or asset
of capitali and consequently, in the maximum value of the company.
The fair value+ of plan assets
Contributions will
made decrease
by theasemployer
a result of:
to the [E(RM) −Economic
RF] = Market profit =risk [EBIT premium
(l − Tax rate)] − $WACC
• • Benefits
Benefitspaidpaid
− Benefits to employees.
to paid
employees.
to employees • Ratios (originally in LC versus current rate method) Economic Dprofit = E[EBIT (1 - Tax rate)] - $WACC
rWACC = profit =rDNOPAT (1 − t) + r
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the period
Reconciliation
Reconciliation of the
of the FairFairValueValue of Plan
of Plan Assets:
Assets: • Pure income statement and balance sheet ratios Economic
V
− $WACC
V E
unaffected. Economic profit
NOPAT = Net operating profit after tax = NOPAT - $WACC
Balance Sheet2018Presentation of Defined
(orBenefit Pensionwill Plans 19
• ©Fair
Wiley
Balance
value
Fair
allof
value
rights
sheet
plan reserved.
of plan assets anyat
assets
unauthorized
liability the copying orof
at beginning
the asset)
beginning
distribution
equals
theofperiod
constitute an infringement of copyright.
funded status
the period
• If foreign currency is appreciating (depreciating),
©
MM Wileyassumptions
2018 all Rights
$WACC Reserved.
= Dollar costanyofunauthorized
capital = Cost copying or distribution
of capital will constitute
(%) × Invested an infringement of copyright.
capital
+ Actual
+ Actual
• +Negative
returnreturnon plan
funded on planassets
assets
status = plan is underfunded = net • Claims valuation
Funded status
Contributions = Fair
made value
by of
the plan assets
employer
+ Contributions made by the employer to the plan to– Pension
the plan obligation mixed ratios (based on year-end b/sheet values) will be Under this approach,
• Investors
a project’s NPV is calculated as the sum of the present values of economic
−pension
Benefits
− Benefits paid liability.
to employees
paid to employees smaller (larger) after translation. • Separate
profit earned
have homogeneous
cash flows
over its life discounted
• Capital markets are perfect.
at the cost
expectations.
available
of capital. to debt and equity
Fair
Where pension value
• Fair value of plan
offunded
obligation
Positive
assets
planis assetsat
either the end
at the=end
pension
status
of the
plan
period
of the
benefit period (US GAAP)
isobligation
overfunded = netor the present value of holders.
• Investors can borrow and lend at the risk‐free rate.
• Hyperinflationary economies NPV =are
∞
∑them
EP t
the defined benefit obligation (IFRS).
Balance Sheet pension
Presentation asset. of Defined Benefit Pension Plans • There• Discount MVA no=agency costs.
t =1 (1 + WACC)
at their
t respective required rates of
Balance Sheet Presentation of Defined Benefit Pension Plans • US GAAP: use temporal method. • Thereturn financing decision
(debt cash flows and the investment
discounted decisionatare independent
cost of debt, of each other.
• If Pension obligation > Fair value of plan assets:
Funded status = Fair value of plan assets – Pension obligation
FundedPlan status Fair value of→plan
is =underfunded Negative
assets –funded
Pension status → Net pension liability.
obligation
• IFRS: (1) restate subsidiary’s foreign currency accountsMM proposition Residual equity
Income cash flows
i without taxes:discounted
Capital Structure at cost of equity).
irrelevance
• If Pension obligation < Fair value of plan assets: Financial RepoRting andfor inflation; (2) translate using current exchange rate;
analysis
• t Add
RI = NI t −PVsre Bt −1of the two cash flow streams to calculate total
Where pension obligation
Where pension
is either pension
Plan is overfunded benefitfunded
→ Positive obligation (US→
status GAAP) or the present
Net pension asset. value of (3) gain/loss in purchasing power recorded on income Given the assumptions company/asset value.
listed above and no taxes, changes in capital structure do not affect
the •
defined benefitobligation
Periodic obligation
pension
is either pension benefit obligation (US GAAP) or the present value of
(IFRS).
cost calculation (same for IFRS and US company value.
the defined
• benefit obligation
Calculating Periodic Pension Cost
Employer contributions. (IFRS). statement. Where
GAAP)
• • IfBenefits
Pensionpaidobligation
to employees> Fairreduce
value the
of plan assets:
pension obligation and the fair value of plan Capital Structure
RIt = residual
LV =income
U V in period t
• assets
Priodic
If Pension
Plan
so
pension
isobligation
they underfunded
have
cost =shown
no impact
Ending
→
> Fair value
onNegativeoffunded
the overall
funded status
plan
funded
−assets:
status.→ Net pension liability.
assets:
status
Beginning funded status – Employer contributions Evaluating Quality of Financial NIt = net income in period t
reBt-1 = equity charge against beginning book value
• • IfWe
Periodic
Pension obligation
Plan
have already Ending
< Fair
is underfunded net→ofNegative
value
that employer plan Beginning
funded
contributions havestatus →toNet
nothing go pension liability.
with periodic
• pension
If cost.isobligation
Plan
Pension overfunded
pension the=periodic <
pension → Positive
Fair value funded
of plan status
– a company’sassets:
net pension → Net + Employer
pension asset. Reports • MM Prop
MM proposition ii without taxes:
I without Higher
taxes: Financial
given leverage Raisesand
MM assumptions the Cost of equity
The RI approach calculates value from the perspective of equity holders only. Therefore, future
• Therefore,Plan pension cost of DB pension contributions
plan equals
no taxes, changes in finance.
capital structure dotonot
cost
the increase
is overfunded
inPensionliability
the pension
→ Positive funded
liability status → Net pension asset. residual
Debt income
finance is ischeaper
discounted
thanat the required
equity rate of return onincreased
However, equity use affect
calculate NPV. leads to an
of debt
Calculating Periodic
Periodic pension =obligation
costCost (excluding
Current service the+impact
costs of costs
Interest benefits paid to
+ Past service costs • Beneish model: the higher the M-score (i.e. the less
employees) minus actual earnings on plan assets.
Calculating Periodic Pension Cost + Actuarial losses − Actuarial gains − Actual return on plan assets
increase in company value
the required
∞
rate of return on equity. The higher required return on equity is exactly
RI
cost = Ending status −costs negative the number) the higher the probability of offset by NPV
• cost ∑ (1 + IIcost
the cheaper
MMof=Prop
t of debt and therefore, there is no change in the company’s weighted
rE )without taxes: higher costfinancial
of capital isleverage raises
Priodic Periodic
pension pension fundedservice
cost = Current Beginning
+ Interestfunded
costs +status – Employer
Past service costs contributions t
The WACC
costs VUof+calculated
VLis=then financial
tD as:
distress) • Dividend
Dividend safetyratio
coverage measure
= (net income / dividends)
VA* = VA + VT + S – C
Comparable Company Analysis
• MM Prop II with taxes: higher financial leverage raises the VA* (DP
= Post‐merger
− SP) value of the combined company
FCFE coverage ratio = FCFE / [Dividends + Share repurchases]
cost of equity and lowers WACC (WACC is minimized at TPV=A = Pre‐merger value of the acquirer
SP
The WACC is thencalculated
D as: E
100%
rWACC =debt) r (1 − t) + rE VT = Pre‐merger value of the target company
D V V S = Synergies created by the business combination
D E
Business Ethics TP = Takeover
C =premium
Cash paid to target shareholders
rWACC = rD (1 − t) + rE
DP = Deal price per share
And the cost V is calculated V
of equity as: SP = Target’s stock price per share
• Friedman doctrine: only social responsibility is to When evaluating a merger offer, the minimum bid that target shareholders would accept is the
increase profits as long as the company
CF stays “within the • market
pre‐merger
Bid Takeover
Evaluation value premium and acquirer’s
of the target company, gain amount that any acquirer
while the maximum
And the cost of equity is calculated Das: rules of the game” would be willing to pay is the pre‐merger value of the target plus the value of potential synergies.
rE = r0 + (r0 − rD ) (1 − t)
E Target shareholders’ gain = Takeover premium = PT − VT
• Utilitarian ethics: best decisions are those that produce
D
rE = r0 + (r0 − rD ) (1 − t)
the greatest good for the greatest number of people Acquirer’s gain = Synergies − Premium
• Agency
Modigilani and Miller Propositions
costs: using E more
debt reduces net agency costs • Kantian ethics: people should be treated154 as ends and = S − (PT − VT) © 2018 Wiley
of equity Without Taxes With Taxes never purely as means to the ends of others S = Synergies created by the merger transaction
• Pecking
Proposition
Modigilani and order
I Miller theory
VL = VU (information asymmetry):
Propositions VL = VU + tD • Rights theories: people have certain fundamental rights
managers prefer internalTaxesfinancing and debt over equity
c08.indd 154 7 March 2018
Without D With Taxes that take precedence over a collective good The post‐merger value of the combined company is composed of the pre‐merger value of
• Static
Proposition rE = r0 + (r0 − rD )
III trade-offVtheory (optimal capital rE = r0 + (r0 − rD ) (1 − t)
structure):
D • Acquirer
the acquirer, prefers
the pre‐merger value cash offer and
of the target, if confident
the synergiesof synergies
created by the merger. These
Proposition L = VU E VL = VU + tD E • Justice theories: just distribution of economic goods andsources of value are adjusted for the cash paid to target shareholders to determine the value of the
and/or target’s value.
increase debt up to the point where further increases in services (veil of ignorance and differencing principle) combined post‐merger company.
D D
value
Proposition II from tax savings
rE = r0 + ( r0are
− rD offset
) by additional costs of
rE = r0 + (r0 − rD ) (1 − t)
E E
EQUITY INVESTMENTS
VA* = VA + VT + S − C
financial
The Optimal Capitaldistress
Structure: The Static Trade‐Off Theory Corporate Governance
Next year’s dividend RetuRn ConCe
Required
VA* = Value ( IRR ) =
return company
of combined + Expected dividend growth rate
Dividends and Share Repurchases
VL = VU + tD − PV(Costs of financial distress) • Objectives: reduce conflicts of interest (manager- Market price
The Optimal Capital Structure: The Static Trade‐Off Theory
shareholder and director-shareholder conflicts) and
Equity Valuation Models
C = Cash paid to target shareholders
• VDividend policy ensure company’s assets are used in the best interests of© Wiley 2018 all Rights Required return ( IRR ) =
Next year’s dividend
D Market price + Expected dividend growth rate
L = VU + tD − PV(Costs of financial distress) • Absolute Reserved. k e (any
valuation:
IRR unauthorized
) = 1estimate + gcopying or distribution
asset’swillintrinsic constitute anvalue, infringement of copyright.
e.g.,
• MM: with perfect capital markets, dividend MeRgeRSpolicy
and aCquiSition investors and stakeholders
dividend discount model
P 0
1 +
S D
M MS Computing
Computing FCFE FCFE = NIfromfrom
+ NCC Net− IncomeFCInv − WCInv + Net Borrowing earnings.V = FCFE 0 (1 + g)
Return
lculate Tastelicious Foods’ on invested
gS =E(1(the capital
+ gMreference (ROIC)
)(1 + gMS )company’s)
−1 measures the profitability
unlevered (asset) beta, which of capital invested by the company.
Computing FCFE from EBIT 0
P0 (E 0(/S r 0 )(
− g 1) − b)(1 + g)
EBITDA is
EBITDA is aa poor
poor proxyproxy for FCFF FCFF for for use use in in valuation because because it: it: =
he impact A of company’s
financial risk, and only reflects the on business
marketrisk of theand confectionaries Working capital =for Current assets (exc.valuation
cash) − Current liabilities (exc. short-term debt)S0 UEt = EPS r − g − E(EPS )
sales growth rate based growth growth of the company’s share in FCFE FCFE == NI
that FCFF − Int−(1FCInv − Tax rate) + Net borrowing
• Return
1 ROIC
market.
measure
= NOPLAT / Invested capital Computing FCFE = EBIT
FCFE +(1NCC
from − Tax CFO rate) − Int−(1WCInv − Tax rate + )Net
+ Dep Borrowing
− FCInv − WCInv + Net borrowing t t
VidEnd Valuation • Price elasticity of demand for its products. different base year values for FCFF and FCFE. RIt =• Expected • Book
Stock screens value − g and
r usually
incomedefine ROE are difficult
criteria (based on to predict.
valuation indicators) for including
In order to forecast industry costs, analysts must consider the following: • Historical average EPS (does not account for changes • If stocks
residual
in an investor’s
per share
portfolio and ofprovide an efficient way tothe
narrow a search
q. for
Present• • The
Present value
Present
value
of Growth
different
of Growth value Opportunities
of
ratesOpportunities
of growth
cost inflation opportunities
in countries where (PVGO)
the company operates. Justified leading P/E multiple P0 D1 /E1 (1 − b) All else • Ifvalue
equal,
RI the return
the
calculation on equity
greater (ROE)
the productivity equals the required
a firm’s return
assets, the on equity
higher (r), the
Tobin’s intrinsic
Value • ofLikely
Fixed‐Rate inflations Perpetual
in costsPreferredfor individual Stockproduct categories. ESG Considerations in company
Justified leading inP/E Freesize).
= Cash = Flow =Models The• Residual
Residual investments.
Income Income
the return
of the Model on Model
stock equitywould (ROE)
(Alternative equalequals its book
Approach) the value.
required return on equity (r), the intrinsic
E1 r−g r−g
•
V• 0 =
Specific
• ofPricing E purchasing characteristics. D
Average ROE (accounts for changes in company size). Single‐Stage • value
If the of
return the stock
on
Residual Income Model would
equity equal
(ROE) isits book
greater value.
than the required return on equity (r), the
Value V = Estrategy
Fixed‐Rate 1
+ PVGO and market
Perpetual Preferred position. Stock 1
• Underlying
V00 =
V = Dr1 + PVGO drivers of input prices. Environmental, (r social,
− g) and governance (ESG) factors, both quantitative or qualitative, can • If RI the=return
intrinsic − (ron×of
E tvalue Btthe
−1 ) stock
equity (ROE) wouldis greater
be greater than the thanrequired
its bookreturnvalue.on equity (r), the
RI t t = EPS t – (r × Bt −1 )
• The
Industry
0
Costs D
r and Inflation
r
competitive environment. or Deflation • Justified P/E
have a material impact on a company’s value. Quantitative ESG-related information The • intrinsic
If
(e.g.,single‐stage
the the return value of the stock would be greater than
residual income model makes the following simplifying assumptions:intrinsic
on equity (ROE) is less than the its
required book
returnvalue.
on equity (r), the
V0 = effects of (1 − b) is the
projected payout ratio.fines/penalties) is relatively easy to integrate into valuation
environmental • Wiley
If
valuethe return
of the on stock equitywould (ROE) be less is lessthanthan its bookthe required
value. return on equity (r), the intrinsic
P/E ratioto forecast r © 2018
RI t = Residual income at time t
In order
P/E ratio
Two‐Stage • Two-stage
Dividend Discount
industryDDM: high costs,
Modelgrowth rate in the short run (first models. Qualitative
analysts must consider the following:
Justified leading ESG-related P
P/E = 0information
D /E (1 − b )
= 1 1 = however, is more difficult to integrate. E The• value =of(ROE
RI t company
The the stock t –earns
r)Bwould be lessreturn
t −a1 constant than its on bookequity. value.
t = Earnings at time t
stage), lower growth rateDin/Elong run (second stage) © 2018
typical Wiley
(albeit subjective) approach E is to
r − adjust
g the
r − gcost of equity by adding a risk premium
The in
single‐stage
• The earnings RI model
growth assumes
rate is constant at a level that is will
that the return on equity lowerremain
than thein excess
required of return
the on
Two‐Stage
• Specific Dividend Discount Model P (1 − b ) Justified trailing P/E multiple 1 r = Required rate of return on equity
n purchasing t characteristics. = (1 − b ) a valuation model. The
requiredsingle‐stage
ratevalue RI model
of return ont‐1 assumes
equity that the return
(resulting on equity will indefinite
remain inperiod excessof oftime.
the This
income in positive RI)t,forandanbeginning-of-period
1 1
Justified leading
(1 + gP/E P/E ratio =1 +P00gS=)nD (11+/Eg1L )= equity.
• Underlying
VJustified
=
D S ) ofratio
+
D0 (=
∑n (1 + r)t t (1 +Er)11n (rn −r g− g) r − g
0 drivers
leading input prices.
E = r − g r − g c11.indd 195 BWhere
t‐1 = Book
required
assumption •
ROE
rate t is calculated
Single-stage
of
at time
return
is a bit equity on
unrealistic
using
RI
equity
net
model(resulting
during
in positive
period
RI) for an indefinite period of
book value
time. This
0
• The competitive t=1 D (1 + genvironment. P0 D1 /E 0 D 0 (1 + g) / E 0 (1 − b)(1 + g) rather than average over as theresidual
period. income will likely fall to zero at some point in time.
S) D (1 + gS ) (1 +LgL ) non-Operating − b)2018isassets and
P/E =Firm ratio.=Value = assumption is a bit unrealistic as residual income will likely fall to zero at some point in time.
V0 = ∑ 0 t + 0 n
Justified
(17 March trailing
thePMpayout
5:44
E r − g r − g
=
r − g
Intrinsic value of a stock: ROE − r
(1 + r ) (1 + r ) (r − gL ) 0 Multistage V0 Residual
= B0 + ∞ Income BValuation
t=1
P D /E D (1 + g ) /E (1 − b ) (1 + g ) − g t − r )Bt −1∞
r(ROE
0
gs = ShortJustified term supernormal
trailing P/Egrowth = P0 =rate D1 /E 0 = D 0 (1 + g ) /E 0 = (1 − b ) (1 + g ) Value of firm = Value of operating assets + Value of non-operating assets Multistage = B0 + ∑
V0 Residual ∞ Income Valuation
Justified trailing P/E = E00 = r1− g0 = 0 r − g 0 = r−g © 2018 Wiley RIt(1 + r )t E − rBt −1
gL = Long‐term sustainable growth rate
E 0 rater − g r−g r−g Justified
Justified • P/E-to-growth
trailing
P/B Multiple Based(PEG)
P/E multiple ratio:
on Fundamentals investors prefer stocks with In the Multistage
V = B + ∑
residual
t =1
t = B0 model,
income + ∑ t the intrinsic value of a stock has three components:
gs = Short
r = required• H-model:
term
return
supernormal growth
growth rate declines linearly from a short-run In the •
• Multistage
0
IfMulti-stage
the return
0
residual (1 +
i =1on equity
RI
r )
incomemodel(ROE) model, (1the
i =1equals )t required
+ rthe
intrinsic value of a on
return stock has (r),
equity threethecomponents:
intrinsic
gL = Long‐term sustainable growth rate
high rate to long-run constant growth rate (H = half the © 2018 WileyP0 ROE − g lower PEGs
nWhere
= Length
r = required return
of the supernormal growth period P D /E D (1 + g) / E 0 (1 − b)(1 + g) value
V0 =of B0the + ROE stock
(PV − would
of 187 equal
rfuture RI over its the
book value. + (PV of continuing RI)
short‐term)
Justified P/E = 0 = 1 0 = 0 =
Where
CR length
“b = retention
n = Length of the high
rate”
of the supernormal growthgrowth periodperiod) •
B0
7 = 2018trailing
PEG
March ratio
r−g
5:44 PM assumes E0 linear
r−g relationship
r−g between r−g P/E and •
V0 = Intrinsic IfV
V the
0 == B
return
B
0 value
0
0
++ (PVon
ofr the equity
of B
future
− g stock today
0 (ROE)RI is
over greater
the than
short‐term) the required
+ (PV ofreturn on
continuing equity
RI) (r), the
CR
The “b = retention
H‐Model rate”
CR “(1 - b) = payout rate”
CR “(1 - b) = payout rate”
growth. B0 = Current intrinsic bookvalue valueofper thesharestockofwould equitybe greater than its book value.
The H‐Model D (1 + g ) D H(g − g ) • If the
Bt = Expected book value return on equity (ROE) is less
per share of equity at any time t than the required return on equity (r), the intrinsic
V0 = 0 L
+ 0 s L c11.indd 187 Justified
ROE = Return• Does
P/B Multiple
on equity notBased account for different risk and duration of
on Fundamentals
rClean Surplus
valuerate ofRelation
thereturn T7 March 2018 5:44 PM
stock(ROE would − r)B bet-1less Pthan − Bits book value.
© Wiley 2018 all rightsr reserved. any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. 47 = Required V0 = B0of +∑ T on tequity
+ P T − BTT
− g
1 + LgL ) anyDunauthorized r −
H ( gs − g r = required growth. return on equity 47 (ROE − r)B
t
t −01 + ∑
© Wiley 2018 all rights D (reserved. L g copying
L) or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. Et = Expected BVt 0==BEPS B for
Et=1 period
t − Dt
(1t+t r) t-1 + (1 T + r) T
V0 = 0 + 0 g = Sustainable P0 ROE − grate t
r)T on equity will remain in excess of the
r − gL r − gL • BPrice = growthto book value (P/B) ratio
The
RI single‐stage
t = Expected residual
RIt=1 model income(1 + r)per
assumes that (1
share the+ return
gs = Short term high growth rate 0 r−g required rate of return on equity (resulting in positive RI) for an indefinite period of time. This
• Sustainable
gL = Long‐term sustainablegrowth growth rate rate Justified • Book value usually positive and more stable than
P/S Multiple Based on Fundamentals Analysts
This
assumption
Residual
Analysts
may
relationship
Income
make describes
is a bitModel any
unrealistic one all of the
changes following
as residual
(Alternative to equity
income
Approach)
assumptions
aswill
havinglikely regarding
gone fallthrough
to zerocontinuing
the income
at some residual
pointstatement.
in time.
g = Short term high growth rate income: may make any one of the following assumptions regarding continuing residual
r s= required return ROE = Return on equity income:
g = Long‐term sustainable growth rate P0 (E 0 /S0 )(1 − b)(1 + g) Multistage Residual Income Valuation
HL = Half‐life = 0.5 times the length of the high growth period t = EPSt –indefinitely
• ItRIcontinues (r × Bt −1 ) at a positive level.
r = required return r = required return
S0
= on equity
−g
Wiley © 2019
H = Half‐life = 0.5 times the length of the high growth period g = Sustainable growthr rate •
• ItIt continues
is zero from indefinitely
the terminal at ayear positive forward.level.
The H‐model equation can be rearranged to calculate the required rate of return as follows: In the Multistage residual income model, the intrinsic value of a stock has three components:
•
• ItItRI is zero from
declines to the terminal
zero as ROE year forward.
reverts to the cost of equity over time.
t = (ROE t – r)Bt −1
The H‐model equation can be rearranged to calculate the required rate of return as follows: Justified
E /S = Net P/SprofitMultiplemargin Based on Fundamentals •
• ItIt declines
reflects the to zeroreversion as ROE of ROEreverts toto the cost
some meanoflevel.equity over time.
0 0
Residual income, or economic profit, recognizes the cost of equity capital. It is calculated by fixed income
deducting a charge for equity capital from net income.
• Companies with positive RI create value as they generate more income than their cost Equity Valuing a capped floater using a binomial interest rate tree is different from valuing an
of obtaining capital. option‐free bond in the following two ways:
• Companies with negative RI effectively destroy value as they do not generate fixed income
sufficient income to cover their cost of capital. • Since it is a floating‐rate security, the coupon payment on the capped floater on the
The more sustainable a company’s competitive advantage and the brighter the industry’s next payment date is based on the interest rate today. Basically, the coupon for the
• Companies
prospects, the higherwith
the higher (lower)
persistence residual income should be associated with higher
factor. priVatE company Valuation
period is determined at the beginning of the period, but paid (in arrears) at the end of
(lower) valuations. eq VAluATIon And AnAlySIS oF CAppEd And FlooREd
the period.
T-1
•
reverting, volatility proportional to short-term rate, no FloATInG‐RATE
Effective
• Since convexity
BondS
the coupon rate is capped, the coupon at each node must be adjusted to reflect
(E − rBt −1 ) E T − rBT-1
V0 = B0 + ∑ t Private + Company Valuation negative interest rates. •
the Callable
coupon bond: when
characteristics interest
of the cap. rates
The effective fall and
coupon rate forthe
the upcoming
Economic Value added (1 + r) t
(EVa) (1 + r − ω )(1 + r)T−1 FI
Valuation of a Capped Floater
period is the lower of (1) the current rate and (2) the cap rate.
t=1
• Vasicek: short-term rate determines the entire term embedded call option is at the money, effective
The Capitalized Cash Flow Method
EVA measures the value added for shareholders by the management of a company during a
implied Growth rate
structure, interest rates are mean-reverting, volatility Valuing a capped
Value
option‐free
floater using
convexity
bondofincapped
turns a binomial
=negative
floater two
the following Value
interestbecause
rate tree is different
the bond’s from valuing
ways:of uncapped floater – Value of embedded cap
priceanis
• Economic
given year. FCFF1Value Added (EVA) constant, negative interest rates possible. capped at the call price.
Vf =
EVA
WACC
= [EBIT
− gf
(ROE (1 − r)− ×Tax
B0 rate)] − (C% × TC)
• Ho-Lee: arbitrage-free model, drift term is inferred • Putable
• Since
The
next
it is athe
higher
payment
embedded
floating‐rate
cap
date is
interest ratebased
security,
rate, the
bond: closerthe
when
call on
thecoupon
the interest
options carry arate
payment
instrument
interest rates
today.
lower
on thetocapped
willrise
trade and
Basically,
likelihood
thefloater
its par value (as
the coupon
of exercise,
on the
andforarethe
g=r−
V0 − B0 from market prices so that the model can accurately periodembedded
therefore is determined
less valuable put
at to option
thethe issuer).isofat
beginning thethe money,
period, but paid effective
(in arrears) at the end of
Vf = Value of the firm generate the current term structure, volatility can be convexity remains positive but the downside is limited
the period.
= NOPAT
EVA cash flow to−the$WACC • Since athe couponFloater
FCFF1 = Free
advantages and Disadvantages
firm for next twelve months modeled as a function of time, negative interest rates Valuation ofby Floored
the putrate is capped, the coupon at each node must be adjusted
price. to reflect
ValuaTIon and analySIS: bondS WITh embedded opTIo
WACC = Weighted average cost ofof the residual income Model
capital the coupon characteristics of the cap. The effective coupon rate for the upcoming
gf = Sustainable growth(MVa)
rate of free cash flow to the firm possible. FI A floor• provision
Floaters
period in alower
is the floaterofprevents
(1) the current rate and
the effective (2) therate
coupon caponrate.
the bond from declining
Market Value added
Private Company Valuation
Advantages: • Yield curve risk can be managed using: below a specified
Convertible Bondsminimum rate. Therefore, it offers investors protection against declining
Value of capped floater = Value of uncapped floater – Value of embedded cap
interest rates.
Market value FCFE
V = added1 (MVA) measures the value created by management for the company’s • Key rate duration. ValuaTIon
ValuaTIonand
ValuaTIon
ValuaTIon
and
and
analySIS:
andanalySIS: bondS
analySIS:bondS
analySIS: bondSW
bondS
W
W
• Unlike
investors r DDM
− g and
by generating FCF valuation
economic models,
profits over the of
the life terminal value estimate (which has a
the company. Conversion value = Market price of common stock × Conversion ratio
• significant
Income amountapproach (suitable
of uncertainty for companies
associated with it) doesexperiencing
not constitute a significant • A measure based on a factor model which explains • TheValue of floored
higher the capfloater = Value
rate, the closerofthe
non‐floored
instrumentfloater + Value
will trade to itsofpar
embedded
valueand
ValuaTIon floor
(asanalySIS:
the bondS WITh embedded opTIo
high=growth)
proportion of intrinsic value in the RI model. Most of the value under the RI model embedded interest rate call options carry a lower likelihood of exercise, and are
changes in the yield curve through level, steepness and Convertible
• • therefore
MVA
V = Valuecomes Market value of the company − Book value of invested capital
of equity Convertible
Convertible Bonds
Convertible
Convertible Bonds
Bonds
Bonds bonds
less valuable Market
to the price of convertible security
issuer).
from current book value, which leads to earlier recognition of value relative to The procedure valuing
pricea=floored floater through a binomial interest rate tree is similar
• Free
FCFE1 =other
Free cash cash
flow to
valuation
flow method.
the equity
models. for next twelve months curvature movements. Market
Convertible
to thatBonds
conversion
of valuing a capped floater, except that ratio
Conversion at each node, the effective coupon rate
r = Required return on equity Valuation Conversion
of a Floored value =
Floater Market
== Market price of common stock ×rate
× Conversion
× Conversion ratio
• uses
Capitalized
Market
• It
g = Sustainable
cash
value of company
accounting
growth rate
data
of
flow
which
free cash
is method
= Market value
easily
flow to
of(capitalization
available.
equity
rate
debt + Market value is
of equity. • Term structure of interest rate volatilities Conversion
forConversion
the upcoming
Conversion value
period
value
value = is the higher
Market
Market price of
price
price ofofcommon
of common
common
Conversion value = Market price of common stock × Conversion ratio
stock ×
(1) the current
stock
stock Conversion ratio
and (2) theratio
Conversion floor rate.
ratio
• It is applicable to companies that do not pay any dividends or have negative free cash
discount rate minus growth rate). Market conversion
in a floaterpremium perthe
share = Market conversion the−bond
price Current market price
flows. • Measure of yield curve risk. A floor provision
Ratchet Bonds prevents effective coupon rate on from
below a specified minimum rate. Therefore, it offers investors protection against declining
declining
Methods • Used to Estimate the Required Rate of Return for a Private
valueCompany
the • It isExcess
residual
earnings
applicable method
to companies
income Model
(calculates
with uncertain firm
cash flows. by • Short-term rates usually more volatile than long-term interest rates.
Market conversion price =
Market
Market price
Market price
Market price of
price of
of convertible
of convertible
convertible security
convertible security
security
security
Ratchet bonds are conversion
Market
Market
Market floating‐rateprice
conversion
conversion bonds
price
price == with both investor and issuer options.
Market
= price of convertible security
Capital Assetadding
• It focuses on value
Pricing Model of intangible assets to working capital
economic profitability. Market conversion price = Conversion
Conversion
MarketConversion
conversion ratio
ratio per share
ratio
rates. ratio premium
Conversion
Market conversion premium ratio = Conversion ratio
The residualand fixed
income (RI)assets).
model breaks the intrinsic value of a stock into the following two Value
• Just likeofconventional
floored floater = Value
floaters, theofcouponMarket
non‐floored price
rate of common
isfloater + Value
periodically stock
of embedded
reset accordingfloor to a
Disadvantages:
components: formula based on a reference rate and credit spread.
Required return on equity = Risk‐free rate + (Beta × Market risk premium)
• Market approach (use for stable, mature companies) Arbitrage-Free Valuation •
• The
Market
Market
Market
Market
However,
Market
procedure
conversion
conversion
conversion
conversion
the bonds
conversion
valuingarepremium
premium
premium
premium per
astructured
premium
floored
per
share
per
per
per share
=
toshare
floater
Market
ensure
share =
=
Market
share =
pricethrough
Market
conversion
Market
Market
= that
Market a at
of convertible
anyconversion
price
conversion
conversion − price
Current
price
reset date,price
conversion
binomial
−− Current
−
marketCurrent
the effective
price − price
Current
Current
bond interest rate tree is similar
market
market
coupon
market price
market price
price
price
•
Expanded It• CAPM
• CurrentisGuideline
based on value
book accounting
public data which can
company
of equity be manipulated
method (based byon
management.
minority rate
to canofonly
Premium
that overdecline;
valuingstraight it canfloater,
value=
a capped never exceed
except thatthe existing
at each node, level.−theAs a result, the
1 effective coupon
coupon rate
Straight value
• Present
• Accounting valuedata
interest).
must be adjusted
of expected to be used
future residual incomein the model. • Use binomial interest rate tree and backward induction • for ratethe
“ratchets
InMarket
upcoming
order conversion
down”
to compensate
overistime.
period the higher of (1) the current rate and (2) the floor rate.
investors Market theconversion premium per sharebonds at the time
• ItRequired
assumesreturnthat the
on clean‐surplus relation
equity = Risk‐free rateholds i.e.,×ending
+ (Beta Marketbook value of equity
risk premium) premium ratio =for this,Market
Market coupon rate on premium
conversion
Market conversion
conversion premium
ratchet
premium per per share
per share
share
for option-free bonds and bonds with embedded optionsRatchet Market conversion premium ratio = Market
=Market conversion premium
floater. per share
• Guideline
equals beginningtransaction
book value+plus method
Smallearnings (based
less
stock premium +on
dividends. control
Company‐specific risk premium
Valuation
of
Bondsof a convertible
issuance
Market
Market
Market is set at bond
conversion
conversion
conversion a level that
premium
premium
premium much is not
ratio
ratio
ratio callable
higher =
= thanorprice
putable:
that
Market
of
of acommon
Market price
Market
standard
price
price of of
stock
common
of bond
common
common stock
stock
stock
• It assumes that interest expense appropriately reflects the cost of debt capital. (except where bond’s cash flows are interest rate path- • This makes a ratchet bond similar to a conventional Market price
callable of common in that stock
when a
perspective). Ratchet bond isare
called, the investor can only purchase a replacement bond oncarrying
the stocka lower
Build‐Up Approach dependent) bonds
Convertible floating‐rate
security valuebonds with
= Straight both
Value
Marketbond
investor
+ Value
price can
and
of the
of convertible
issuer options.
call option
bond
Scenarios• when Priorthetransaction
residual income method
model is (usually based on minority © 2018 Wiley
appropriate:
(prevailing)
Premium over coupon
straightrate.
value=A ratchet be thought of as− 1the lifecycle of a callable
interest).
• Use Monte Carlo method to simulate a large number of Valuation bond,like
• JustPremium
of
Premium
Premium
with
a
one callable
conventional
over
convertible straight
bond
over straight
over straight
bond being
floaters,
value= the Market
Market
Market
replaced
coupon
Market price
price
Straight
price
rate
pricevalue
by of
ofof
isof convertible
convertible
convertible
another
periodically
convertible
value=for the issuer is that the call decision−
that
value= is callable but not putable:
bond
bond
bond
until reset
the
bondbond’s
according
−−1111
eventual
to a
Required return on equity = Risk‐free rate + Equity risk premium + Small stock The Term STrucTure and InTereST raTe dynamIcS Premium
maturity overonstraight
is reached. value=
The appeal Straight value −is on autopilot,
• The company does not have premium a history of paying dividends,risk or dividends The Term potential
beSTrucTure and InTereSTinterest
raTe dynamIcSrate paths in order to value a bond formula based a reference rate and creditStraight
spread. value
Straight
Straight value
value
• predicted
Asset-based approach (use + Company‐specific
for start-ups, firms premium cannot
with + Industry risk and there
• However,
Valuation are
the no
of a convertible transaction
bonds bond that
are structured costs.
is nottocallable or putable:
ensure that at any reset date, the effective coupon
with certainty. premium whose cash flows are interest rate path-dependent
7 March 2018 5:44 PM
rateConvertible
can only decline; it canvalue
callable bond never = Straight
exceed the value + Valuelevel.
existing of theAs calla option
result,on thethe
coupon
stock
• The minimalcompany’s profits, banks,
free cash REITs,
flows are natural
expected resources)
to remain ValuaTIon for
negative and analySIS: bondS WITh embedded opTIonS
the foreseeable Valuation
Valuation
Valuation
Valuation of
of aaaa convertible
of
of convertible
convertible
convertible bond
bond
bond
bond that
that−is
that
that is
is not
isValue
not
not callable
not callable
callable or
or
or putable:
putable:
putable:
The TermTerm Structure
Structure and and Interest
Interest Rate Rate Dynamics 224 rate “ratchets
Convertible down”value
security over =time.
Straight Value +callable
ofValue
the callof orthe putable:
option callon the bond
option on the stock © 2018 Wiley
• Discount
Discount future. The
for Lack of for lack(DLOC)
Control of control (DLOC)
ValuaTIon
Bonds with Embedded Options
and analySIS: bondS WITh embedded opTIonS
Dynamics • InMinimum
order to value
compensate = greater
investors of
for conversion
this, the coupon value rate or
on straight
ratchet value
bonds at the time
• The estimates of terminal value using alternative valuation models entail a great ofConvertible
issuance is set at abond
security level
value much == higher than
Straight Value that+ of a standard
Value of thefloater.
the call option on the stock
Discount Factor
Discount Factor Valuation and Analysis: Bonds With Embedded Options • This
Convertible
Valuation
Convertible
Valuation of
makes a ratchet
security
of aa convertible
Convertibleconvertible
security
securitybond
bond that =
value
that
value
value =is
similar
Straight
callable
callable and
is Straight
Straight Value
Value
Value
but not
to a conventional ++putable:
+
putable: Value
Value
Value
callable
of the
of
of the
bond
call option
call
call option on
inoption
that when
on the
on the stock
the stock
a stock
amount of uncertainty.
DLOC = 1-
1
• Callable
Valuation bond and Analysis: Bonds With Embedded c13.indd 224 Options bond is called, the investor can only purchase a replacement bond carrying a lower
Convertible callableand putable bond value = Straight value
7 March 2018 5:43 PM
1
11 + Control premium Valuation
Valuation of
of aaaa convertible
(prevailing) convertible
coupon
callablerate.
convertible bond
Avalue
bond that
ratchet
that is
bondcallable
can
is callable
callable but
bebut not
thought
but not putable:
of as the option
putable: lifecycle of astock
callable
Scenarios P (when
T ) = the residual income model is not appropriate: Value of callable bond = Value of straight bond – Value of embedded call option Valuation
Valuation of
of
Convertible convertible bond
bond
bond that
that is
= Straight
is callable
value +
but
+ Value not
not
Valueof theofputable:
putable:
the
callcall
option on on thethe
stock
P ( T ) = [1 + r ( T )]T T bond, with one callable bond being replaced by another until the bond’s eventual
[1 + r (T )] Value of callable bond = Value of straight bond – Value of embedded call option − Value of the call option
maturity is reached. The appeal for the issuer−isValue of the
that the call
on the
call bondon the bond
option
decision is on autopilot,
• There
Discount for Lack are significant violations
of Marketability of the clean surplus relation.
(DLOM) Convertible
andConvertible callable
there are no callable
transaction bond value
costs. == Straight
+ Value
Straight value of + +theValue of
put option the call
on call option
the bond on the stock
Value of embedded call option = Value of straight bond – Value of callable bond Convertible callable bond value = Straight value + Value
Value of the
the call option on on the
the stock
stock
• • P(T)
Where ItTotal discount
is isdifficult with
to predict
a discount factor the DLOC
usedmain and discount
determinants
to determine for lack
of residual
the present valueincome ofi.e., book
of a payment value at
received • Putable
and Value of embedded
Convertible callable bond
bond value
bond call option = Value of straight bond – Value of callable bond Valuation of a convertible bond that is callable and putable:
value = Straight value
value + Value of
of the call option
option on the stock
Where P(T) is a discount factor used to determine the present value of a payment received at −− Value
−
− Value of
Value of the
of the call
the call option
call option on
option on the
on the bond
the bond
bond
time T, marketability
ROE.
T, r(T)
r(T) is the
the yield
yield (DLOM)
to maturity
maturity of the
the payment,
payment, also known
known as
as aa spot
spot rate,
rate, and T is
and T is the
the tenor
tenor Value of the call option on the bond
time
(number DLOM
is to
= 1to− maturity).
of periods
periods
1of also 224
Value of putable bond = Value of straight bond + Value of embedded put option Credit Analysis
Convertible callableand putable bond value = Straight value © 2018 Wiley
(number of 1 + Marketability premium
to maturity). Value of putable bond = Value of straight bond + Value of embedded put option Valuation of
of aaaa convertible
Valuation of
Valuation convertible bond
convertible bond that
bond that is
that is + Value
callable
is callable
callable and of the call option on the stock
putable:
and putable:
and putable:
Total discount = 1 – [(1 – DLOC)(1 – DLOM)] Valuation of convertible bond that is callable and putable:
Forward Contract Price
© 2018 WileyContract
Forward Price • Effect
Value of of interest
embedded rate volatility
199option
put = Value of putable bond – Value of straight bond • Loss given default = % of overall position lost if default
− Value of the call option on the bond
Value of embedded put option = Value of putable bond – Value of straight bond
c13.indd 224
+ Value of the put option on the bond
Convertible callableand putable bond value = Straight value
7 March 2018 5:43 PM
instrument through time. Therefore, these costs are addedofincarrying the forward And puton
pricing or the callunderlying
value will be as thewell. If the value
present price of of the
the terminal
underlying value falls,
forthetheput benefits,
option. The while + Other income (such as parking)
risk-free
At• Carry
V
expiration (T) costs,
= PV like
of the
S rate
differences
– F of
(T) interest,
in forward
equation. through time. Therefore, these costs are added in the forward pricing
t T 0
increaseprices the= burden
PVF 0 (T)
t,T [F– t(T)
S T – F 0 (T)] the underlying
Two• important the
A writtenlong concepts
underlying
call is related position
equivalent
rate is used for discounting, and must be compounded over two periods.
to the to two-period
loses
selling out. the binomial
stock short option
and valuationthe
investing model
proceeds.areNet • = Net
Operating operating
Capitalization
Potential Income
gross rate =
Private
income
NOI1
income (PGI) Real Estate Investments
instrument dynamic A• replication and self-financing.
• Carry benefits decrease the burden of carrying the underlying instrument through Hedge • Ratio Since Use
written forh is process
negative
put
Puts is equivalent toputs,
for value a When
toa buying
put put
is equivalent
the applied
option
stock with toto acall
using short options:
borrowed the
position in the
funds. − Vacancy and collection Value loss
Carry • equation.
Price
time,
• benefits
Carry soandof
these
benefits
a FRA:
costs benefits forward
are accounted
decrease arethesubtracted
burden
rate
for starting
in
inofthis the forward
equation
carrying
at FRA
the in pricing expiration,
equation.
the computation
underlying instrument of the two• Dynamic
through
underlying expectations and lending out the proceeds of the short sale. Specifically, a long
approach. Net Operating =Rental
Effective income
Income grossatincomefull occupancy
(EGI)
position
the expectations + on replication
a put can be
–approach means
overinterpreted
one thatPeriod
theasportfolio
lending of thatstockhas been and borrowing
partially financeddynamically with −a+Operating
Other income (such(OE) aswe parking)
Carry Arbitrage
forward given
prices. two
Model LIBOR
When therates Underlying Has Cash Flows p – p Rearranging the above equation,
expenses can estimate the value of a property by dividing its first‐year
time, so these benefits are subtracted in the forward pricing equation. • replicates
hTwo-period
short = position the value binomial
in shares. of the callmodel through for European
the binomial lattice. stock options =NetPotentialrate. gross income (PGI)
• Value of a FRA prior toT expiration © 2018
• Wiley Self-financing S+ – S– means that if additional funds are required to purchase more NOI by Rental
shares to
=the
−
capoperating
Vacancy
income
and
at income
full occupancy
collection
(NOI)
loss
• IfF0a(T) = (S0 −payment
dividend γ 0 + θ0 ) is(1announced
+ r) between the forward’s valuation and expiration c• =Use PVr[E(c backward 1)] induction with the expectations + Other income (such as parking)
© 2018 Wiley maintain
Options the hedge, the amount of borrowed funds will automatically increase. == Effective NOIgross income (EGI)
• Calculate
dates, assuming that new theimplied
news announcement forward rate does not based change onthecurrent price of the Writing
Value of ap Put =approach.
PV r[E(p1)]
Option
The Direct ValueCapitalization
Potential = gross1 income Method (PGI)
−−Vacancy
Operating andexpenses
Cap rate
collection (OE)loss
LIBOR
underlying, rates.
the value of the original forward will fall.
or CommitmentS
aluation of forward • The mark-to-market adjustment in futures markets results in the value of a futures
the• expectations
The• price
A • Value
7written
March 2018 call approach
5:43
of call
PMis equivalent
and in aput two-Period
to options
selling the Setting
stock short and investing the proceeds. = =Effective
Cap Net rate = Discount
operating
gross incomerate −(EGI)
income (NOI) rate
Growth
• Calculate interest savings based on the this newofforward A of 7written
a callput or put option, under
is equivalent to buyingthis approach,the stockiswith calculated
borrowed directly
funds.from expected − Operating expenses (OE)
contract after settlement equaling zero. Therefore, values otherwise identical terminal coption πc +payoffs.
March 2018
+25:43
(1++ − π)c −
PM
+– 2 –– AnThe estimate
Direct of the appropriate
Capitalization cap rate for a property can be obtained from the selling price of
Method
F0 (T)
forward rate = and
Svs T
+ r) rate.
FRA
0 (1futures − contracts
( γ 0 − θ0 ) will (1 + r) T
likely be different. c = = PV[π c + 2 π (1 – π)c + (1 – π) c ] The cap• or
= Net
Direct
rate operating
can becapitalization
defined income (NOI)
as the current method yield on an investment:
(1 +++r) similar comparable properties.
Markets Where Accrued Interest Is Not Included in the Bond Price Quote the expectationsp = PV[π2approach p + 2 π (1 over– π)p one +– Period 2 – –
+ (1 – π) p ]
Interest
• Discount
rate forward
these
and futures
interest contracts
savings for a period equal to
where:
The Direct • Cap rate = Discount rate
Capitalization
Capitalization Method
NOIrate − Growth
1NOI
from rate comparable property
Valuing a Forward Contract When the Underlying Has Carry Benefits/Costs Capitalization
Cap rate = rate =
F0the (T) =number QF0 (T) × of CF(T) days andremaining
QF0 (T) = 1/ CF(T) until FRA × F0 (T) expiration c = PVr[E(c1)]
Cap rate =
Sale priceValue
Discount
of comparable property
rate − Growth rate
plus the number of days in the term of the underlying Very important: (1 + rUnder − d) this approach, the value of the option is computed based solely Theon cap rate can be defined as the current yield on an investment:
Forward Rate Agreements π== PVr[E(p1options
pAmerican )]
Vt (T) = PV of differences in forward prices = PVt,T [Ft (T) − F0 (T)] possible
© 2018 Wiley
• terminal (u −values.d) 253we can estimate the value of a property by dividing its first‐year
hypothetical loan (using appropriate LIBOR rate). Rearranging the abovebyequation, NOI
A forward F0rate
(T) =agreement PVCI(fra) ) × (1is +a r) forward
T
= [B0contract
(T + Y) where + AI 0 −the underlying is r)
anTThe price• ofAmerican
interest or put call options onapproach,
a non-dividend-paying stock
The cap rate
The
NOI
risksby
cap the • Capitalization
rate cap
derived
Value
canrate.be defined
dividing
of property rent
rateas= the current 1 by recent sales prices of comparables is known as the all
yield on an investment:
0 −
ofIt(Sainvolves PVCI 0,T ] × (1 + is a calloptions option, under this is calculated directly from expected
rate on• a deposit.
Price bond futures contract (1)when accrued interest
0,T american-Style yield (ARY). The value ofValue a property is then calculated as:
two counterparties: the fixed DR payer/floating receiver (long
terminal option willpayoffs. neverDerivatives be exercised early.
position) not
and included
(2) the floating inunauthorized
the bond
payer/fixed price
receiver quote
(short position).(convert this price to NOI1rate NOI
© Wiley 2018 All Rights Reserved. Any copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. Capitalization
= Rent= 1
The futures price of the bond is calculated as:
the quoted futures price using bond’s conversion factor)
c14.indd 253
American-Style • Early Optionsexercise and Early of American
Exercise call options on a dividend- Rearranging Value
Market the value
above
Cap =equation,
7 March 2018
rate
1 5:43 PM
Value we can estimate the value of a property by dividing its first‐year
ARY
• A long FRA position can be replicated by holding a longer-term 252 78 Eurodollar time
© Wiley 2018 All
paying
Rights
stock
Reserved. Any
and American
unauthorized copying or
put options
distribution will constitute
onanboth infringement of
NOI by the cap rate.
© 2018 Wiley
copyright.
currency forward contracts T • An American-style call option on non-dividend-paying stock will never be exercised
F0 (T) =and
deposit [B0at(Tthe + Y) same + AI 0 − shorting
time PVCI 0,T ](or × owing)
(1 + r) on − AI a shorter-term Eurodollar time dividend-paying and non-dividend-paying stocks may Rearranging • Gross the above income equation, we can estimate the value of a property by dividing its first‐year
multiplier
T
early, because the minimum value of the option will exceed its exercise value.An
Otherestimate ofofthe appropriate
NOI1 Approach cap rate formethod a property can be obtained from the selling price of
deposit. NOI byForms
theValuecap the
= Income
rate.
Pricing a Currency Forward Contract © 2018• Wiley There bemay optimal be casesinwhere some early cases.
exercise of an American-style call option on similar
a or comparable Capproperties.
rate 253
The quoted• Price futures of a
price currency
of the bond forward
is calculated as:
Think of the long position in an FRA as the party that has committed to take a hypothetical • Black-Scholes-Merton model for European options on
c14.indd 252 dividend-paying stock is
DR
optimal. Gross
7 March income
2018 NOI
5:43 PM multiplier =
Selling price
• Early exercise of American-style put options on both dividend-paying and non- Value = 1 NOIGross income
loan, and the short as the party(1that Cap rate Cap = rate
+ r has )T committed to give out a hypothetical loan, at the fixed non-dividend-paying
dividend-paying stocks may be warranted stock in certain cases. An estimate of the appropriate
Sale price ofcap rate for aproperty
comparable property can be obtained from the selling price of
FRA rate.QF F0,PC/BC = S0,PC/BC × [B (TPC+ TY) + AI − PVCI ] × (1 + r)T − AI
0 (T) = 1/CF(T) × (1 + rBC )
0 0 0,T T
c14.indd 253 similar or comparable 7 properties.
March 2018 5:43 PM
An estimate of
Value theof appropriate
subject cap
property rate
= for a property can be obtained
× Grossfrom the selling price of
FRA Payoffs no-arbitrage versus expectations approach in a multi-Period Setting The cap rate derived by dividing rentNOI by recent sales multiplier
Gross income prices of comparables income of subject
is known as theproperty
all
Currency Forward Contracts Cap rate = properties.
similar or comparable
risks yield (ARY). The Salevalue priceof of a property
comparable is then calculated as:
property
• IfFLIBOR 0,PC/BC =at S0,PC/BC
FRA expiration ×e (r − r ) × T
PC BC
is greater than the FRA rate, the long benefits. • Generally speaking, European-style options can be valued based on the expectations
approach. Under this approach, option value is determined as the present value of theCap rate = Rent1
NOI Wiley © 2019
Effectively, the long has accessSto a loan × (1 rPC )T
at +lower-than-market interest rates, while the = price
shortInterest rate parity:
is obligated F0,PC/BC
to give
0,PC/BC
out =a loan at lower-than-market interest rates. expected future option payouts, where the discount rate is the risk-free rate and Thethe capMarket
rate derived value Saleby dividing
ARY
of comparable
rent by recent property
sales prices of comparables is known as the all
• If the forward rate is higher than the(1spot + rBC )T it means that
rate, the price currency
○ Stated differently, the long benefits as the fixed payer and floating receiver. expectation is based on the risk-neutral probability measure. risks yield (ARY). The value of a property is then calculated as:
risk-free rate is higher than the base currency risk-free rate. • Both American-style options and European-style options can be valued based on the
ARBiTRAge PRicing TheoRy
Arbitrage pricing theory (APT) describes the expected return of an asset (or portfolio) as a
Assumptions
90 Where: i =1
Beginning market value © Wiley 2018 All Rights Reserved. Any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. R − µ n
wai = The E(R izActive
= ) =factor riskweight= Active risk squared −
− Active specific
specific risk
Pσ ∑
th asset’s
nactive in the riskportfolio
squared(i.e., the difference between the asset’s weight in
Active factor n
VALUATION: NET ASSET VALUE APPROACH w irisk
R i = Active Active risk
Capitalization rateNOI − Capital expenditures + (Ending market value − Beginning market value) Proportion
REITs Proportion of venture
of venture capitalist investment
capitalist investment× Shares held byheld
× Shares theby
Where: portfolio E(Rand
E(R P ) =its
P) = ∑
∑ wi R
i =1weight
w R i in the benchmark)
Return = company
companyfounders
founders σ 2
The = The
ε = Information residual i =
risk 1 of
i i
the i th asset (i.e., the variance of the ith asset’s returns that is not
Capitalization rate Beginning Shares to be issued = w a
The ith asset’sRatio i =active
1 weight in the portfolio (i.e., the difference between the asset’s weight in and M
property market value Shares to be issued = Proportion of investment of company founders Thei Information i Ratio Measuring
NOI of a comparable Proportion of investment of company founders the explained by andthe factors)
Capitalization rate = portfolio its nweight in the benchmark)
• Net asset value Total (NAV)
NOIvalue approach
of a of comparable
comparable property
property σ 2
= The σ E(R =
residual P )RRw ∑
=p2risk −
σ
−
2R
R
w+of
BiRw i2 σ 2ith+asset
the 2w σ w
(i.e., σ ρ
the variance of the i th
asset’s returns that is not
Capitalization rate = ε P=
propertyby capitalizing Price per •
Price per share
Step 5: Price per share IR
σ = w σi22i +
wpi22ii=1 +B wj22 σ 22j + 2wi σi wj σ j ρi, j
Measuring iand j Managing
• Estimate valueTotal explainedσ IR P= σ ) jj σ=jjActive
+ 2wii σrisk i w jσ jρi, j − Active Market
specific riskRisk
i
of operating
value of comparable real estate share Active
byP the pi −
factor w
risk jsquared i, j
s(Rfactors)
s(R
p − RB)
iR B
Net Asset Value NOI (exclude
per Share non-cash rents).
© Wiley 2018 all rights reserved. any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. Price per share = 87Amount of venture capital investment Estimating VaR—Parametric Method
Amount of venture capital investment The Information Unannualized
Active
σ P = wfactor 2Ratio 2 risk σ2Pσ=2=+2w Annual
Active σP /ρ
risk No. of days
squared
0.5
− Active
0.5 specific risk
Net Asset Value per Share
• Total NAV Price per share =Number of shares issued to venture capital investment Unannualized i σ i +wσ σj P = =j Annual i σ i wσjσ P j/ No.i, j of days0.5
Net = Value
Asset Value of operating real estate + Value of Number of shares issued to venture capital investment
Unannualized P Annual σP / No. of days
NAVPS = R − µ
other tangible
Shares assets – Value of liabilities.
outstanding
Net Asset Value Adjusted discount rate The
Note
•
NoteInformation
that:
that:
Historical
z = R pRatio − R Bsimulation: returns are ranked lowest to
NAVPS = Equity
Note IR = σ
Exposure—CAPM
that:
• NAV per share
Shares = Total NAV ÷ Number of shares
outstanding Adjusted discount rate
87 94
94 ©
© Wiley
Wiley 2018highest,
All s(R −VaR
Rights
Rights pReserved.
R B ) Any is determined
Any unauthorized copying for
or required
or distribution will confidence
will constitute an infringement of copyright.
© Wiley 2018 all rights reserved. any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. • 2018The All parametric Reserved.
R − R B method
unauthorized
using the copying
normal distribution
distribution constitute
is easyantoinfringement
use and of copyright.
employs
VALUATION: outstanding.
RELATIVE VALUATION (PRICE MULTIPLE) APPROACH Commodities
Adjusted discount rate =
1+ r
−1
1 −1q+ r
• The
• interval
The
historical
IR
parametric
) = prfvalues
E(r=aparametric n+ β [method
method
E(r
that M )can rusing
− using ] adjusted
fbe
the normal
the normal distribution
distribution is
for reasonableness
is easy
easy to to use
use and
and employs
in any environment.
employs
historical values that can be adjusted for reasonableness in any environment.
Funds• from
VALUATION: Price RELATIVE
to funds
operations (FFO)
VALUATION
from operations ratio (PRICE MULTIPLE) APPROACH Adjusted discount rate =
1− q
− 1 • • Monte
historical
However,
• However,
E(R
However,
s(R
P ) = ∑
pvalues
it −does
Carlo
it does
R
w
does
BR
i i
) that
simulation:
not can
reflect
not reflect
be
reflect the
adjusted
the employs
nonparametric for
the nonparametric losses
user
reasonableness
losses -developed
losses that
thatin any
result
that result
environment.
from
result from
unexercised
from unexercised
unexercised
• Spot • assumptions
options in iti=1a portfolio nottothat generate expirenonparametric a distribution of
worthless. random
Funds from operations (FFO) r = Discount rateand futures
unadjusted pricingof failure.
for probability Fixed Income
options
options
Exposure
in aa portfolio
in portfolio that
that expire worthless.
expire worthless.
• Further, the distribution changes as time value diminishes and the option value
Accounting net earnings q = Probability of failure.
• Contango: futures price >ofspot • outcomes
Further, the distribution changes as time value diminishes and the option value
r = Discount rate unadjusted for probability failure.price. 94 ©First-• and
Wiley 2018Further,
All Rightsthe
second-order
approaches distribution
Reserved.
the Any unauthorized
yield
underlying effects changes on copying
security bondas value
time value
or distribution
price: diminishes
will constituteand
at maturity. the optionof value
an infringement copyright.
Add: Depreciation charges on real estate approaches 2 2the underlying security value at at maturity.
maturity.
• • Finally,
2 2
Accounting net earnings qBackwardation
= Probability of failure. Conditional
σ P = wsensitivity
approaches i σ the jσVaR:
i +wunderlying j +2w
to average
i σ isecurity
correlation w jσ jρchanges i, jloss
value expected
between portfolio outside assets adds instability to
Add:
Add: Deferred
Depreciationtax charges
charges on real estate • Backwardation: spot price > futures price. • Finally,
• Finally, sensitivity
sensitivity to to correlation
correlation changes between
changes between portfolio
portfolio assetsassets adds
adds instability
instability to to
Add 94 © Wiley 2018 theconfidence
the ∆AllBestimate.
Rights Reserved.
estimate. ∆y limits Any ( ∆y)2 copying
1 unauthorized or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
Add:(Less):
Deferred Losses (gains) from sales of property and debt restructuring
tax charges = −D + C
Funds
Add (Less):fromLosses
operations
(gains) from sales of property and debt restructuring
• Insurance
Backwardation Ft < S0 theory (theory of normal backwardation): the
Equity• Exposure—CAPMB
estimate.
Incremental 1 + y VaR: 2 (1change + y)2 in VaR if a position within the
The historical simulation method uses current portfolio weights for each asset multiplied
Funds from operations Most futures
futures
Ft <contracts
S0
market will be in backwardation normally
will be worth less than the corresponding spot rate to recognize the by The historical simulation
The historical
portfolio
its percentage
simulation method
return changes method uses
for each period.
uses currentcurrent portfolioportfolio weights
All available returns
weights for for each
representing
each asset
asset multiplied
expected
multiplied
reality
Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) because
present value producers
of the future benefit. Futuressell prices
futures to locktoinspot
will converge prices so that
as the contract by
Delta
by
approaches
would
its percentage
its be used.
E(ra ) = rreturn
percentage f + β [for
return
Returns
E(rMeach
for each
the repriced ]
) − rfperiod.
period. All available
All
portfolio
available returns returns representing
are ranked lowest
representing expected
expected reality
to highest, and VaR
reality
is then
Adjusted • Price
fundsto fromadjusted
operations funds
(AFFO) from operations ratio maturity, revenues
at which time are
F = Smore
. predictable
Most futures contracts will be worth less than the corresponding spot rate to recognize the
t 0
would •
would
determined
beMarginal
be used. Returns
used.for
Returns
the
VaR:
required
for the
for change
the repriced
repriced
confidence
in VaR
portfolio
portfolio
interval.
for arearanked
are marginal
ranked lowestchange
lowest to highest,
to highest, in and VaR
and VaR is is then
then
Funds from operations determined
Fixed portfolio
Income for the ∆ positions
required
c confidence interval.
present value of the future benefit. Futures prices will converge to spot as the contract determined
approaches Deltafor Exposure
the
= required confidence interval.
Less:
FundsNon‐cash rent
from operations Contango• Hedging pressure hypothesis: if consumers (producers) ∆ S
Less:
Less: Maintenance‐type
Non‐cash rent capital expenditures and leasing costs maturity, at which time Ft = S0.
have greater demand for hedging, the futures market willNote
Note that:
Note • First-
that:
First-that:
and second-order and second-order yield effects on bond yield price:effects on bond price
Adjusted funds from operations
Less: Maintenance‐type capital expenditures and leasing costs Ft > S0
Contango be in contango (backwardation) Gamma • The historical simulation method can be adjusted by overweighting more current or
Adjusted funds from operations • The
• The historical
∆Bhistorical simulation
∆ysimulation 1 method
( ∆method 2
y)underweighting can be
can be adjusted
adjusted by by overweighting
overweighting more more current
current oror
AFFO is preferred over FFO as it takes into account the capital expenditures necessaryFutures to more =realistic
− D returns + Cwhile older or less realistic outcomes.
• contracts
Theory have
of greater
storage value than the spot price.
•
more
more B
Additionally,
realistic
realistic 1 + returns
y ∆
returns
delta
2 while underweighting
while
(1 + y)
underweighting
2 older or
older or less
less realistic
realistic outcomes.
outcomes.
maintain the economic
AFFO is preferred overincome
FFO asof a property
it takes portfolio.
into account the capital expenditures necessary to
F t > S 0
• Γ = gamma =historical simulation can accommodate options
Additionally,
historical simulation can accommodate
options
in a portfolio because it
in a portfolio because it
• uses Additionally,
outcomeshistorical that ∆Sactually simulationoccurred. can accommodate options in a portfolio because it
maintain • EV
the to EBITDA
economic ratio:
income of aEBITDA can be computed as NOI
property portfolio.
Components • Futures
of Futures price
Returns = Spot price + Storage costs –
• On
uses outcomes
uses outcomes that
the other hand,
that actually
actually occurred.
the historical
occurred.
simulation method suffers from the disadvantage of
Futures contracts have greater value than the spot price. Delta
minus G&A expenses Convenience yield.
Spot price return = (St – St-1)/ PSt-1
•
New• call
On
• representing
OnImpact the other
the other
price:
hand,
ofonly delta
hand, the
theand
historical
historical
historical gamma
reality
simulation
simulation
rather onthan method
call
methodoption
extreme
suffers
suffers from
price
from the
outcomes
the disadvantage
thatdisadvantage
can occur. Asof
of
representing only only historical
historical reality reality rather rather than than extreme
extreme outcomes
outcomes that that can
can occur.
occur. AsAs
• DCF valuation approach: use dividend discount model asComponents • Convenience
of Futures Returns yield is inversely related PM to inventory size
PM
arepresenting
result, historical
aa Delta
result,=historical
result,
∆c
historical
simulation is recommended
simulation is
simulation is recommended
recommended only
only when the future
only when
when the the future
appears
future appears
likely to
appears likely
likely to
to
Roll return = [(Near-term futures contract closing price – Farther-term PM futures contract closing reflect past results. 1
REITs pay dividends and general availability of commodity. reflect
c + ∆ c past
≈ ∆cS+results.∆ ∆ S + Γ ( ∆ S ) 2
price)/Near-term
Spot price futures contract
return = (Stclosing PSt-1 × Percentage of the position in the futures contract reflect past results.
– St-1)/price] c
2
c
© Wiley
© Wiley 2018
Wiley 2018 All
2018 All Rights
All Rights Reserved.
Rights Reserved. Any
Reserved. Any unauthorized
Any unauthorized copying
unauthorized copying or
copying or distribution
or distribution will
distribution will constitute
will constitute an
constitute an infringement
an infringement of
infringement of copyright. • Components of futures returns: price return, roll return, Gamma
being
copyright.
of copyright. rolled. Roll return is positive for markets in backwardation where the spot rate at maturity
©
Private Equity for one instrument can be rolled into a lower-priced forward for farther
Roll return = [(Near-term
collateral return futures contract closing price – Farther-term
322out expiration. Roll yield
322the new futures contractVega closing © 2018 Wiley
is negative for markets in contango as the spot price will be lower than 322
price)/Near-term futures contract closing price] × Percentage of the position in the futures contract
futures price. • Sensitivity risk measures can complement VaR because ©© 2018 2018 Wiley
Wiley
(1) they address ∆delta shortcomings of position size measures,
• Sources of value creation: reorganizing investee being • Commodity
rolled.
Collateral return Rollis return
the yield swaps:
is positive
(e.g., excess
for markets
interest return
rate) for in swap,
thebackwardation
bonds or cash totalwhere
used return
the spot the
to maintain rate at maturity Γ = gamma ∆c =
∆ S
company, raising higher levels of debt, aligning interests for swap,
one instrument
investor’s basis
can beswap,
futures position(s). rolled into variance swap,
a lower-priced volatility
forward for farther
c16.indd swap
322 out expiration. Roll yield andVega (2) ≈ they do not rely on history
∆σ S 7 March 2018
c16.indd 322 7 March 2018
is negative for markets in contango as the spot price will be lower c16.indd than
322 the new futures price. 7 March 2018
New call price:
© Wiley 2018 return
Collateral all rights is
reserved. any unauthorized
the yield copyingrate)
(e.g., interest or distribution
for thewillbonds
constitute
orancash
infringement
used to maintainNew
of copyright. the call price: 91
1
investor’s futures position(s). c + ∆c ≈ c + ∆ c ∆S + Γ c ( ∆S)2
c + ∆c ≈ c + ∆ c ∆S + Γ c ( ∆S)2 + vega∆σ S
12 Wiley © 2019
2
© Wiley 2018 all rights reserved. any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. Vega 91
The Information Ratio
E( RA )* = IC BR σ A
The information ratio measures the active return from a portfolio relative to a benchmark
per unit of active risk (which is the volatility of the active return, and also known as
produce
where: the highest Sharpe ratio for her own portfolio.
© Wiley 2018 all rights reserved. any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright. 97 today
c17.indd 341
LEVEL II CFA
®
MOCK EXAM
96 © Wiley 2018 All Rights Reserved. Any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
© Wiley 2018 All Rights Reserved. Any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
98 © Wiley 2018 All Rights Reserved. Any unauthorized copying or distribution will constitute an infringement of copyright.
Wiley © 2019