PRIMARY NAVIGATION...

HOME 2014 CASES MCQ TOYS

LAW TECH WORLD

Legal Techie Site

CASE DIGEST: ANTONE V. BERONILLA

Published by geline on July 11, 2013 | Leave a response

Send

Like 0

ANTONE V. BERONILLA

G.R. No. 183824, [December 8, 2010], 637 SCRA 615.

DOCTRINE:

As reiterated in a long line of cases, Article 40 of the Family Code has been established as
a new provision expressly requiring judicial declaration of nullity of a prior marriage for
purposes of remarriage. Therefore, a person who contracts a subsequent marriage absent
a prior judicial declaration of nullity is guilty of bigamy.

FACTS:

Myrna Antone alleged in her Affidavit-Complaint,filed in March 2007, that she and Leo
were married in 1978. However, Leo contracted a second marriage with Cecile Maguillo
in 1991. The prosecution filed the Information in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) in a
criminal case of Bigamy.

Pending the setting of the case for arraignment, Leo moved to quash the Information on
the ground that the facts charged do not constitute an offense because his marriage with
Myrna was declared null and void as of April 2007 and became final and executory on
May 2007. Leo argues that since the marriage had been declared null and void from the
beginning, there was actually no first marriage to speak of. Thus, absent the first
 marriage, the facts alleged in the Information do not constitute the crime of bigamy. The
prosecution argued that the marriage of Myrna and Leo on 1978 was not severed prior to
his second marriage on 1991, for which bigamy has already been committed before the
court declared the first marriage null and void on 2007.

The RTC sustained the motion to quash relying on Morigo v. People. Similarly, the Court
of Appeals dismissed the petition for certiorari.

ISSUE:

Whether a subsequent declaration of nullity of the first marriage only after contracting
the subsequent marriage is immaterial in the crime of bigamy.

HELD:

Yes.

RULING:

Article 40 of the Family Code has reversed the previous ruling of People v. Mendoza
(under the Civil Code) declaring that: (a) a case for bigamy based on a void ab initio
marriage will not prosper because there is no need fora judicial decree to establish that a
void ab initio marriage is invalid; and (b) a marriage declared void ab initio has
retroactive legal effect such that there would be no first valid marriage to speak of after
all, which renders the elements of bigamy complete.

In fact, this was exhaustively discussed in Mercado v. Tan. It stated that, under the
Family Code a subsequent judicial declaration of the nullity of the first marriage is
immaterial in a bigamy case because, by then the crime had already been consummated.
Otherwise stated, a person who contracts a subsequent marriage absent a prior judicial
declaration of nullity of a previous marriage is guilty of bigamy.

While, Morigo v. People was promulgated after Mercado, the facts are different. In
Mercado, the first marriage was actually solemnized, although later declared void ab
initio. While in Mendoza, no marriage ceremony was performed by a duly authorized
solemnizing officer, because what occurred was a mere signing of a marriage contract
through a private act. Thus, there is no need to secure a judicial declaration of nullity
before Morigo can contract a subsequent marriage. The ruling of Morigo is not applicable
to this case.
 Like 0

Send

Posted in Case Digest, Persons and Family Relations

0 Comments Law Tech World Login

Sort by Best Share Favorite

Start the discussion…

Be the first to comment.

ALSO ON LAW TECH WORLD WHAT'S THIS?

Online Survey: 2013 Senatoriables The man who created computer worm
14 comments • a year ago 1 comment • a year ago
Hambog Ka Villar — No to Cynthia g — lol
Villar!!!!!!!!!!!

Gangnam Style: It’s More Fun in Baguio! Blizzard launches open beta for
1 comment • a year ago Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft
POGI — WTF! may idol! 1 comment • 6 months ago
malya — panget

Subscribe Add Disqus to your site

 ← PREVIOUS NEXT →

CATEGORIES

Bar Exams
Case Digest
Elections
Laws
Civil Law
Credit Transactions
Obligations & Contracts
Persons and Family Relations
Succession
Torts and Damages
Commercial Law
Commercial Law Review
Corporation Law
Intellectual Property Law
Criminal Law
IT Law
Labor Law
Labor Law Review
Labor Relations
Legal Ethics
Other Laws
Political Law
Administrative Law
Law on Public Officers
Political Law Review
Public Corporation
Public International Law
Remedial Law
Remedial Law Review
Taxation Law
Taxation Law Review
MCQ
Technology
 Uncategorized
World
Entertainment
Fastfood Toys
Games
Travel

COMMENTS

malya on Blizzard launches open beta for Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft

xD on 100 MOST ANTICIPATED FILMS OF 2014 pt.1
xD on Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare: Not your usual TPS game
joanmarie on Online Survey: 2013 Senatoriables
Jason on Online Survey: 2013 Senatoriables
gam ( rn take one) on Online Survey: 2013 Senatoriables
G1 Volunteer on Online Survey: 2013 Senatoriables
Gerald Agapito on Online Survey: 2013 Senatoriables
Chloe Evangelista on Online Survey: 2013 Senatoriables
Dave Kyle Mina on Online Survey: 2013 Senatoriables
Live Traffic Feed

A visitor from Philippines viewed

"Case Digest: ANTONE V.
BERONILLA" 36 secs ago
A visitor from Makati, Manila
viewed "Law Tech World: Legal
Techie Site" 8 mins ago
A visitor from Quezon City
viewed "Case Digest: YU V.
JUDGE REYES-CARPIO AND
A visitor
YU" fromago
25 mins Makati, Mindoro
Occidental viewed "Restaurant
Review: Halo-Halo de Iloko
Balay"
A visitor49from
minsMakati,
ago Manila
viewed "Law Tech World: Legal
Techie Site" 1 hr 12 mins ago
A visitor from Quezon City
viewed "Case Digest: YU V.
JUDGE REYES-CARPIO AND
YU" 1 hr from
A visitor 50 mins ago City
Quezon
viewed "Case Digest: REPUBLIC
V. GALANG" 3 hrs 32 mins ago
A visitor from Pelotas, Rio
Grande do Sul viewed "Law Tech
World: Legal Techie Site" 3 hrs 49
mins ago from United States
A visitor
viewed "Californication Season 6
Casting News: Maggie Grace as
Faith- TVfrom
A visitor Series
SanLounge" 4 hrs 4
Juan, Manila
mins ago
viewed "Case Digest: ANTONE
V. BERONILLA" 6 hrs 35 mins
Real-time view · Menu
 PRIMARY NAVIGATION...

HOME 2014 CASES

MCQ TOYS

LAW TECH WORLD

Legal Techie Site

CASE DIGEST: ANTONE

V. BERONILLA
Published by geline on July 11,
2013 | Leave a response

ANTONE V.
BERONILLA

G.R. No. 183824,

[December 8, 2010], 637
SCRA 615.

DOCTRINE:

As reiterated in a long
line of cases, Article 40

Copyright © 2014 Law Tech World.

Powered by WordPress and Live Wire.