Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Rafaela T. Alves
Luciano A. Bueno
Artur Da S. Gouveia-Neto
3+ 4 6
were handled employing the proper software of the spec- 1.2 Sm (λ em = 600 nm) - G 5/2 H 7/2
trometer (Ocean Optics, SpectraSuite). The data were stored 3+ 4 7
and analyzed in a personal computer employing a commer- Tb (λ em = 545 nm) - D 4 F5
1.0
cially available software. The spectra were converted into
CIE-1931 coordinates using a specially designed software excitation
Intensity (a.u.)
(SPECTRA LUX, Ponto Quântico/RENAMI, Recife, 0.8
355 nm
375 nm
Brazil).16,17 The time-resolved measurement apparatus con-
sisted of a spectrofluorometer (Horiba, TCSPC Nanolog), 0.6
a pulsed pump lamp (Horiba-FL1040-1457B-3714), an
iHR 320 spectrometer connected to a SpectrAcq2 Data 0.4
Acquisition Module (Horiba), and a photomultiplier tube
detector. The lifetimes were measured using the expression 0.2
τeff ¼ ½I em ðtÞdt∕I em ð0Þ,15 where τeff is the calculated effec-
tive lifetime, I em ðtÞ stands for the time dependence of emis- 0.0
sion intensity, and I em ð0Þ is the initial intensity. The effective 350 400 450 500
lifetime, obtained by integrating the normalized decay curve, Wavelength (nm)
gives a better description of radiative decays that are not
described by a single exponential function.19,20 Fig. 2 Excitation spectra of Sm3þ (λem ¼ 600 nm) and Tb3þ
(λem ¼ 545 nm) single-doped samples.
3 Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows the absorption spectra of the single-doped (a) 1.2 3+
ðSm3þ ; Tb3þ Þ and codoped Sm3þ ∕Tb3þ samples. The Sm (1.0 mol. %)
H7/2
F7/2
λem = 600 nm
6
absorption peaks indicated in Fig. 1 are related to the intra-
4
1.0
G 5/2
λexc = 375 nm
H5/2
configurational (f–f) electronic transitions departing from the
4
Sm3þ ð6 H5∕2 Þ and Tb3þ ð7 F6 Þ ground state, respectively. It is
6
0.8
important to point out the overlap of the Sm3þ ∶6 H5∕2 − 4 I9∕2 ,
Intensity (a.u.)
I13/2
M 19/2
5∕2 − G7∕2 absorption band and the double-peak Tb ∶
H9/2
6H 4 3þ
4
0.6
6
7
F6 − D4 transition absorption/emission spectral band.
5
H5/2
H5/2
H5/2
G 5/2
6
A few transitions are not labeled in the absorption spectrum,
6
D3/2, 1/2
4
0.4
G 5/2
owing to their low absorption cross section, and as such are
G 9/2
H11/2
4
4
H9/2
F3/2
H5/2
6
4
H5/2
To obtain the proper excitation wavelength for this study, we 0.2
G 5/2
6
H5/2
6
have carried out the excitation spectrum measurement and
H5/2
4
6
6
0.0
two different UV excitation wavelengths were utilized to 300 400 500 600 700
activate each ion separately depending upon the intent of Wavelength (nm)
the measurement. Figure 3 shows typical emission along
with excitation spectra of the 80PbGeO3 ∶10PbF2 ∶10CdF2 (b) 1.2
3+
Tb (1.0 mol. %)
phosphors single-doped with Sm3þ ð3aÞ and Tb3þ ð3bÞ.
λem = 545 nm
F5
1.0
7
λexc = 375 nm
5
0.8
Intensity (a.u.)
L10
5
1.2 3+ 3+
1.0 Sm /0.0 Tb 0.6
I9/2
F6
7
4
3+ 3+
0.0 Sm /1.5 Tb
1.0
G7/2
3+ 3+
1.0 Sm /1.0 Tb
Sm : H5/2
0.4
4
3+ 6
F7/2
F4
I11/2
F5/2
G5/2
F3
0.8
7
Sm : H5/2
L9
F6
6
F9/2
Intensity (a.u.)
7
D4
F3/2
0.2
6
4
D4
5
7
3+ 6
H15/2
D4
6
H13/2
5
6
F6
Sm : H5/2
D4
Tb : F6
F11/2
Sm : H5/2
5
Sm : H5/2
0.6
5
3+ 7
6
Tb : F6
Sm : H5/2
3+ 6
6
Sm : H5/2
3+ 6
0.0
6
3+ 6
3+ 7
3+ 6
Sm : H5/2
Sm : H5/2
Sm : H5/2
0.4
3+ 6
Wavelength (nm)
3+ 6
3+ 6
3+ 3+
Tb /Sm
0.2 Tb
3+
Fig. 3 Excitation and emission spectra of (a) Sm3þ and (b) Tb3þ sin-
gle-doped samples under excitation at 375 nm. The emissions are
3+
Sm the ones with the highest intensity.
0.0
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
(green), 582 (yellow-red), and 620 nm (red) originated from
Wavelength (nm)
the 5 D3 → 7 F6 , 5 D4 → 7 F6 , 5 D4 → 7 F5 , 5 D4 → 7 F4 , and
5 D → 7 F transitions, as portrayed in Fig. 3(a). The emis-
Fig. 1 Absorption spectra of the single-doped samples with Sm3þ and 4 3
Tb3þ . Concentrations are presented in mol. %. sion spectrum of Fig. 3(b) exhibits four distinct visible
5 6
30 L10 P3/2, 5/2
5 4
G M17/2
5 6 4
D3 F
4 5/2
25 I13/2, 11/2, 9/2
5
D4 4
Energy (x 10 cm )
G7/2
-1
20 4
F3/2
650 nm
582 nm
487 nm
542 nm
620 nm
-4
4
G5/2
706 nm
645 nm
600 nm
561 nm
15
375nm
355nm
375nm
355nm
6
Fj=11/2
10 9/2
7 7/2
Fj=0 5/2
1 6
5 2 Hj=13/2
3
4 11/2
5 9/2
7/2
0 6 5/2
3+ 3+
Tb Sm
Fig. 4 Simplified energy-level diagram of the excitation and downconversion emission for the
Tb3þ − Sm3þ ion pair excited using UV light. Upward arrows indicate excitation, downward arrows
stand for luminescence emission, and curved arrow and double arrow denote energy transfer and
multiphonon relaxation processes, respectively.
F5
(red), and 706 nm which were assigned, respectively, to
7
3+
the electric dipole samarium 4 G5∕2 → 6 H5∕2 , 4 G5∕2 → 6 H7∕2 , 7 0.0Sm
Tb : D4
3+
0.2Sm
5∕2 → H9∕2 , and G5∕2 → H11∕2 transitions.
4G 6 4 6
3+ 5
6 1.0Sm
3+
H7/2
ples under both excitation wavelengths for a fixed terbium 5
6
concentration and varying the samarium content. As can
Sm : G5/2
4
be inferred from spectra, for both excitation wavelengths,
H9/2
F6
H5/2
3+ 4
the terbium characteristic emissions decrease with increasing
7
F3
6
F4
H11/2
3
6
7
7
Sm : G5/2
samarium concentration, and as expected the samarium
Tb : D4
Sm : G5/2
6
Tb : D4
3+ 5
Tb : D4
3+ 4
distinct emissions increase. In Fig. 5, one exhibits the emis- 2
3+ 5
3+ 4
Sm : G5/2
3+ 5
3+ 4
1
(b) 375 nm, which activate both Tb3þ and Sm3þ ions present
in the host matrix and the spectra present emissions charac- 0
teristic of either ions. For the 355-nm excitation, nondetect- 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
able emission associated to samarium is not expected though Wavelength (nm)
it is observed owing to the fact that for this wavelength one
basically excites terbium ions only as indicated in the exci- (b) 7 3+
Tb (1.5 mol. %)
H7/2
3+
7
0.0Sm
energy-transfer Tb3þ ½5 D4 to Sm3þ ½4 F3∕2 ; 4 G5∕2 enhances
6
6 3+
Tb : D4
Sm : G 5/2
0.2Sm
population in the samarium ions excited state 4 G5∕2 from
3+ 5
3+
3+ 4
5 1.0Sm
where the emitting transitions produce luminescence. One λexc = 375 nm
Intensity (a.u.)
H9/2
6
F6
3
Sm : G 5/2
F4
H11/2
F3
3+ 4
Tb : D4
6
Tb : D4
2
3+ 5
Sm : G 5/2
3+ 5
3+ 5
1
was employed. Time-resolved luminescence measurements
were carried out and the results indicated a substantial
0
decrease in the lifetime of the 5 D4 energy level associated 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
with the 545-nm emission of Tb3þ ions due to the presence Wavelength (nm)
of Sm3þ codoping, as indicated in data portrayed in Fig. 7.
As it can be observed from data, the 545-nm emission life- Fig. 5 Emission spectra of 1.5Tb3þ ∕x Sm3þ (x ¼ 0.0, 0.2, and
time reduced substantially when the samarium concentration 1.0 mol. %) under excitation at (a) 355 nm and (b) 375 nm.
(a) 4 3+
1.0 3+
Sm (1.0 mol. %) Tb (1.5 mol. %)
F5
H7/2
3+ 3+
0.25Tb
7
0.0Sm
6
3+
Tb : D4
0.75Tb 0.8 3+
Sm : G 5/2
0.2Sm
3+ 5
3+ 1.8
3 1.25Tb
Normalized intensity
3+ 4
3+
1.50Tb
3+
1.6 1.0Sm
Intensity (a.u.)
Lifetime (ms)
λem = 545 nm
H9/2
H5/2
2 1.2
6
6
F6
F4
Sm : G 5/2
Sm : G 5/2
0.4
7
F3
7
H11/2
1.0
7
Tb : D4
3+ 4
3+ 4
Tb : D4
6
3+ 5
0.8
3+ 5
Tb : D4
1
Sm : G 5/2
3+ 5
0.2 τ = 1.65 ms 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
3+ 4
1 3+
Sm concentration (mol. %)
τ = 1.30 ms
2
0
τ = 0.85 ms
3
0.0
450 500 550 600 650 700 750 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Wavelength (nm) Time (ms)
5 Sm (1.0 mol. %)
fixed 1.5 Tb3þ ∕x Sm3þ samples with x ¼ 0.0, 0.2, and 1.0 mol. %.
F5
3+
6
0.25Tb
7
3+
Tb : D4
0.75Tb
3+ 4
3+ 5
4 1.25Tb
3+
H9/2
3+
1.50Tb
6
Intensity (a.u.)
λexc = 375 nm 1
H5/2
Sm : G5/2
3 2
6
3+ 4
3
Sm : G5/2
F6
3+ 4
F4
F3
H11/2
7
2
7
7
Tb : D4
Tb : D4
6
Tb : D4
3+ 5
3+ 5
Sm : G5/2
3+ 5
1 4
3+ 4
1
0 2
450 500 550 600 650 700 750 1
3
Wavelength (nm) 4
2 5 5
3
Fig. 6 (a) Emission spectra of 1.0Sm3þ ∕x Tb3þ (x ¼ 0.25, 0.75, 1.25, 4
and 1.50 mol. %) under excitation at (a) 355 nm (20 mW) and 5
(b) 375 nm (18 mW).
excitation was generated. Fluorescence emissions around 15. D. Chen et al., “Novel rare earth ions-doped oxyfluoride nano-
composite with efficient upconversion white-light emission,” J. Sol.
487, 542, 561, 582, 600, 620, 645, 650, and 706 nm State Chem. 181(10), 2763–2767 (2008).
were obtained in double-doped samples under 355- and 16. A. S. Gouveia-neto et al., “Generation of wide color gamut visible light
in rare-earth triply doped tantalum oxide crystalline ceramic powders,”
375-nm excitation wavelengths. The relative intensity of J. Appl. Phys. 107(10), 103539 (2010).
the Sm3þ and Tb3þ ions’ individual distinctive emissions 17. H. T. Amorim et al., “Red-green-blue upconversion emission and
depends upon the excitation wavelength, relative ion concen- energy-transfer between Tm3þ and Er3þ ions in tellurite glasses excited
at 1.064 μm,” J. Solid State Chem. 171(1–2), 278–281 (2003).
tration, and the energy-transfer Tb to Sm mechanism, as well 18. W. F. Silva et al., “Color tunability with temperature and pump intensity
as the allowed tonality tenability of overall luminescence in Yb3þ ∕Tm3þ codoped aluminosilicate glass under anti-Stokes exci-
emission. The CIE-1931 chromaticity coordinates of the tation,” J. Chem. Phys. 133(3), 034507 (2010).
19. A. Katelnikovas et al., “Synthesis and optical properties of green to
overall luminescence resided in the range (0.31; 0.59) to orange tunable garnet phosphors for pcLED,” Opt. Mater. 33(7),
(0.62; 0.37). Time decay measurements indicated efficient 992–995 (2011).
nonradiative Tb3þ to Sm3þ energy-transfer mechanism. 20. R.-J. Xie and N. Hirosaki, “Eu2þ -doped Ca-α-SiAlONCa-α-SiAlON:
a yellow phosphor for white light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett.
84(26), 5404–5406 (2004).
21. Y. Q. Li et al., “Luminescence properties of red-emitting
Acknowledgments M2 Si5 N8 ∶Eu2þ (M ¼ Ca, Sr, Ba) LED conversion phosphors,”
The financial support for this research by Conselho Nacional J. Alloys Compd. 417(1–2), 273–279 (2006).
22. X. Xen et al., “A white light emitting phosphor Sr1.5 Ca0.5 SiO4 ∶Eu3þ ,
de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Grant Tb3þ , Eu2þ for LED-based near-UV chip,” J. Lumin. 131(12), 2697–
No. 483338/2013-9, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos 2702 (2011).
23. V. R. Bandi et al., “Luminescence and energy transfer of Eu3þ or/and
(FINEP) CTInfra, Infraspeq 11 and 12, and Coordenação Dy3þ co-doped in Sr3 AlO4 F phosphors with NUV excitation for
de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior WLEDs,” J. Alloys Compd. 538, 85–90 (2012).
(CAPES) PVE-AO77/2013, is gratefully acknowledged. 24. B. H. Babu and R. K. Kumar, “Warm white light generation in γ-irra-
diated Dy3þ , Eu3þ codoped sodium aluminoborate glasses,” J. Lumin.
Rafaela T. Alves was supported by a graduate studentship 169A, 16–23 (2016).
from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de 25. Q. Du et al., “Novel multiband luminescence of Y2 Zr2 O7 ∶Eu3þ ,
Ensino Superior (CAPES). We gratefully acknowledge R3þ (R = Ce, Bi) orange-red phosphors via a sol–gel combustion
approach,” Opt. Mater. 35(2), 257–262 (2012).
Professor C. Jacinto (IF-UFAL) for allowing us to exploit 26. G. Lakshminarayana, H. Yang, and J. Qiu, “White light emission from
his laboratory facility for the decay-time measurements and Tm3þ ∕Dy3þ co-doped oxyfluoride germanate glasses under UV light
excitation,” J. Sol. Stat. Chem. 182(4), 669–676 (2009).
Mr. Tasso O. Sals for technical support with the equipment. 27. Y. Yu et al., “Color-tunable emission and energy transfer in
Tm3þ ∕Dy3þ ∕Sm3þ tri-doped phosphate glass for white light emitting
diodes,” Opt. Commun. 303, 62–66 (2013).
References 28. X.-Y. Sun et al., “Enhancement of Tb3þ emission by non-radiative
energy transfer from Dy3þ in silicate glass,” Physica B 404(1), 111–
1. E. F. Schubert and J. K. Kim, “Solid-state light sources getting smart,” 114 (2009).
Science 308(5726), 1274–1278 (2005). 29. X. Wan et al., “Luminescence and energy transfer in Dy3þ ∕Tb3þ
2. C. Feldmann et al., “Inorganic luminescent materials: 100 years of co-doped CaO − Al2 O3 − B2 O3 − RE2 O3 glass,” J. Non-Crystal. Sol.
research and application,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 13(7), 511–516 (2003). 357, 3424–3429 (2011).
3. H. S. Jang and D. Y. Jeon, “Yellow-emitting Sr3 SiO5 ∶Ce3þ , Liþ 30. J. Pisarska et al., “Energy transfer from Dy3þ to Tb3þ in lead borate
phosphor for white-light-emitting diodes and yellow-light-emitting glass,” Mater. Lett. 129, 146–148 (2014).
diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(4), 041906 (2007). 31. U. Caldino et al., “Down-shifting by energy transfer in Tb3þ ∕Dy3þ
4. S. Nakamura, T. Mukai, and M. Senoh, “Candela-class high-brightness co-doped zinc phosphate glasses,” J. Lumin. 161, 142–146 (2015).
InGaN/AlGaN double-heterostructure blue-light-emitting diodes,” 32. Y. Dwivedi, A. Rai, and S. B. Rai, “Energy transfer in Er:Eu:Yb
Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(13), 1687–1689 (1994). co-doped tellurite glasses: Yb as enhancer and quencher,” J. Lumin.
5. J. K. Park et al., “Warm-white-light emitting diode utilizing a single- 129 629–633 (2009).
phase full-color Ba3 MgSi2 O8 ∶Eu2þ , Mn2þ phosphor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 33. Y. Dwivedi, D. K. Rai, and S. B. Rai, “Stokes and anti-Stokes lumines-
82(5), 683–685 (2003). cence from Eu∕Yb∶BaB4 O7 nanocrystals,” Opt. Mater. 32(9), 913–919
6. J. K. Park et al., “Application of strontium silicate yellow phosphor (2010).
for white light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84(10), 1647–1649 34. Q. Luo et al., “Sensitized Yb3þ luminescence of Eu3þ ∕Yb3 -codoped
(2004). fluorosilicate glass ceramics,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95(3), 1042–1047
7. J. K. Sheu et al., “White-light emission from near UV InGaN-GaN LED (2012).
chip precoated with blue/green/red phosphors,” IEEE Photonics 35. B. Dieudonne et al., “Up-and down-conversion in Yb3þ − Pr3þ co-
Technol. Lett. 15(1), 18–20 (2003). doped fluoride glasses and glass ceramics,” J. Non-Cryst Solids 377,
8. A. Bergh et al., “The promise and challenge of solid-state lighting,” 105–109 (2013).
Phys. Today 54(12), 42–47 (2001). 36. C. M. Trindade et al., “White light generation via sequential stepwise
9. M. G. Craford, “Visible LEDs: the trend toward high-power emitters absorption and energy-transfer frequency upconversion in Tm3þ ∕Er3þ -
and remaining challenges for solid state lighting,” Proc. SPIE 4776, codoped glass,” J. Solid State Chem. 255, 13–16 (2017).
1–8 (2002). 37. G. Lakshminarayana et al., “White light emission from Sm3þ ∕Tb3þ
10. J. K. Kim and E. F. Schubert, “Transcending the replacement paradigm codoped oxyfluoride aluminosilicate glasses under UV light excitation,”
of solid-state lighting,” Opt. Express 16(26), 21835–21842 (2008). J. Phys. D 42, 015414 (2009).
11. F. Auzel, “Materials and devices using double-pumped-phosphors with 38. U. Caldino et al., “Optical spectroscopy and waveguide fabrication in
energy transfer,” Proc. IEEE 61(6), 758–786 (1973). Sm3þ ∕Tb3þ doped zinc–sodium–aluminosilicate glasses,” Opt. Mater.
12. C. Liu and J. Heo, “Generation of white light from oxy-fluoride nano- 34(7), 1067–1071 (2012).
glass doped with Ho3þ , Tm3þ and Yb3þ ,” Mater. Lett. 61, 3751–3754 39. A. Bahadur, Y. Dwivedi, and S. B. Rai, “Enhanced luminescence and
(2007). energy transfer study in Tb:Sm codoped lead fluorotellurite glass,”
13. A. S. Gouveia-Neto et al., “White light generation by frequency upcon- Spectrochim. Acta A 118, 177–181 (2014).
version in Tm3þ ∕Ho3þ ∕Yb3þ codoped fluorolead glass,” Appl. Phys. 40. A. N. Meza-Rocha et al., “Neutral and warm white light emission in
Lett. 91(9), 091114 (2007). Tb3þ ∕Sm3þ zinc phosphate glasses,” Opt. Mater. 47, 537–542 (2015).
14. D. Chen et al., “Bright upconversion white light emission in transparent
glass ceramic embedding Tm3þ ∕Er3þ ∕Yb3þ ∶β-YF3 nanocrystals,”
Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(25), 251903 (2007). Biographies of the authors are not available.