Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
April 28, 2016 No Class Meeting Complete self-efficacy intervention in the field.
June 2, 2016 Exercise & Gender or Exercise & Age (Children and Older Adults)
Exercise Adherence Papers Due
June 9, 2016 “Final” (7:30 – 10:00 PM) Exercise Adherence Project Presentations
Cheating, plagiarizing, misrepresentation and/or collusion in this course will result in a zero score and will
seriously affect your grade. Please refer to the University’s Academic Honesty policy at
www.calstatela.edu/univ/stuaffrs/jao Additional explanations of these terms and policies can be found on the
following page of this syllabus.
Academic Honesty
The University in its quest for truth and knowledge embraces honesty and integrity. These fundamental
values must not be compromised. The trust and respect among professors, students and the society need
to be vigilantly protected. Cheating and plagiarism can be neither justified nor condoned as this would
destroy the ideals and purposes of higher education. Students enter the University to gain the knowledge
and tools necessary for participation in society. Academic integrity is one foundation for a society based
on trust and honesty. Therefore, the University takes seriously its responsibility for academic honesty.
The following are included as violations of the Academic Honesty Policy (See Appendix D in the
University Catalog):
Cheating-the act of obtaining or attempting to obtain credit for academic work through the use of any
dishonest, deceptive, or fraudulent means.
Plagiarism-the act of using ideas, words, or work of another person or persons as if they were one’s own,
without giving proper credit to the original sources.
Misrepresentation-Knowingly furnishing false academic information to a University official, faculty
member, or campus office.
Collusion-Any student who intentionally helps another student perform any of the above acts of cheating,
plagiarism or misrepresentation.
Academic Consequences
Faculty have the right to establish the standards by which the academic performance of students will be
evaluated, including the consequences of students not meeting some portion or all of the academic
requirements of a course through acts of cheating, plagiarism, misrepresentation or collusion. These
consequences may include but are not limited to assigning a lowered grade, zero or “F” on an individual
assignment, or lowering the student’s grade or assigning an “F” in the course. Faculty may alternatively
permit the student to repeat an assignment/test or complete and submit additional assignments.
Total Points: 40
Students will choose 3 separate real life applications of situations that altered self-
efficacy. Students should choose examples with clear connections to alterations in self-
efficacy.
Types of Examples:
At least one of the examples should illustrate the improvement of self-efficacy
At least one example should demonstrate the lowering of self-efficacy
At least one example of someone else altering your self-efficacy
At least one example of you altering someone else’s self-efficacy
Total Points: 3 x 10 = 30
Overall this subject participated in physical activity an average of 2.9 days per week, for an
average of 31.25 minutes. See Table 1. The subject failed to meet the behavior criterion set for the action
stage.
The subject’s baseline exercise self-efficacy score was 67. The score raised to 72 and 75 following
the intervention.
Discuss the subject’s progress. Describe any factors that may have assisted the subject in attaining
the action stage or remaining in the maintenance stage. Describe any factors that may have prevented the
subject from reaching the action stage. Also discuss any changes in self-efficacy as it pertains to progress.
(6)
Discuss which processes the subject may have used during the eight-week period. (5)
Discuss both the subject’s and the researcher’s prediction of future exercise behavior. (5)
References (5 points)
List all references in APA format.
Appendix (5 points)
Include completed data collection sheets.
Results:
Slide 4: Summary of results should fit into 1 table. (10 points)
Discussion:
Slide 5: Stage Classification
Stage at Start (5 points)
Stage at Finish (5 points)
Total Points: 50