Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2912590, IEEE
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a Transactions onthis
future issue of Instrumentation and Measurement
journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
0018-9456 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2912590, IEEE
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a Transactions onthis
future issue of Instrumentation and Measurement
journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
crystal, as shown in Fig. 1 [7], [10]: III. COST FUNCTION, CONSTRAINTS AND OPTIMIZATION
PROCESS
𝜆 𝑑
𝑉𝜋⊥ = , (2) In this section, we redefine the theoretical output peak-peak
2𝑛03 𝑟41 𝐿
voltage as
𝜋 𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 𝜋 𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃
where 𝜆 is the free-space wavelength of the incident laser 𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑇ℎ𝑃𝑃 = 𝑉0 [sin2 (𝜑 + ) − sin2 (𝜑 − )], (6)
4 𝑉𝜋⊥ 4 𝑉𝜋⊥
beam, 𝑛0 is the ordinary refractive index of the crystal, 𝑟41 is
the Pockels coefficient, 𝐿 is the length of the crystal along the where 𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 = 2𝐴0. It can be observed that (6) is function of
propagation trajectory of the beam and 𝑑 is the height of the 𝑉0 , 𝜑, 𝑉𝜋⊥ and 𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 . The value of applied peak-peak voltage,
crystal (separation of the electrodes).
𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 , is driven by means of a variable transformer (variac)
The output voltage can be estimated taking into account the
and measured with a high voltage probe and oscilloscope (see
equivalent system for the experimental setup shown in Fig. 3:
Fig. 2). The parameter 𝑉0 is function of 𝐺, 𝑆, 𝛼 and 𝑃𝑖𝑛 , but
𝜋 𝜋 𝑉𝑎𝑝 (𝑡)
𝐺, 𝑆 and 𝑃𝑖𝑛 are taken as known and they are defined in Table
𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡 (𝑡) = 𝐺𝑆10−𝛼⁄10 𝑇(𝑡)𝑃𝑖𝑛 = 𝑉0 sin2 ( + ), (3) 2, then 𝑉0 is only function of 𝛼 in this case. 𝛼 can be estimated
4 2 𝑉𝜋⊥
through
where 𝑉0 = 𝐺𝑆10−𝛼⁄10 𝑃𝑖𝑛 and 𝑃𝑖𝑛 is the power of the laser 𝛼 = −10𝑙𝑜𝑔10 [𝑉0 ⁄(𝐺𝑆𝑃𝑖𝑛 )]. (7)
diode given by the device enclosure screen; 𝑇(𝑡) takes into
account the loss due to the operation of the Polarizer-BGO Thus, the unknown parameters in the proposed model are
crystal-Analyzer system; 𝛼 takes into account the total losses 𝑉0 , 𝜑 and 𝑉𝜋⊥ . Here, we also want to estimate the phase
due to the devices insertion (prism, lens, plates, optical introduced by the compensation plate in the experimental
connectors, etc.), the beam divergence and alignment, the setup and verify that is approximately 𝜋⁄4, because it could
electro-optical and optical-electrical conversions, i.e., 𝛼 would happen that a compensation plate designed for a different
represents the insertion loss of the sensing cell; 𝑆 is the wavelength to the light source is taken, as is the case in our
photosensitivity of the photodiode given by the manufacturer experiment where the compensation plate is designed for 633
and 𝐺 is an additional gain applied to the signal output by nm and the laser diode emits at 660 nm, which could introduce
means of an instrumentation amplifier. a slightly different phase of 𝜋⁄4.
Note that 0 ≤ 𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡 (𝑡) ≤ 𝑉0 , then, to alternate These parameters are determined through model fitting
symmetrically with respect to zero, i.e. − 𝑉0 ⁄2 ≤ 𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡 (𝑡) ≤ techniques using the experimental peak-peak values of output
𝑉0 ⁄2, an offset voltage is added. Finally, the theoretical output voltage, 𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑃𝑃 , which is measured at final of the setup
voltage for our arrangement is defined as: with the oscilloscope (see Figs. 2 and 3). The optimization
algorithm Pattern Search was used to estimate the model
𝜋 𝜋 𝑉𝑎𝑝 (𝑡) parameters in order to minimize the difference between the
𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑇ℎ (𝑡) = 𝑉0 sin2 ( + ) − 𝑉𝑜𝑓𝑓𝑠𝑒𝑡 , (4)
4 2 𝑉𝜋⊥ measured and modeled peak-peak output voltage [15], [16].
Therefore, the sum of squares of the difference between the
where 𝑉𝑜𝑓𝑓𝑠𝑒𝑡 = 𝑉0 ⁄2. It can also be shown that if 𝑉𝑎𝑝 (𝑡) = theoretical and experimental peak-peak output voltage is used
𝐴0 sin(2𝜋𝑓𝑡), where 𝑓 is the frequency in 𝐻𝑧 and the 𝐴0 as cost function:
amplitude of the applied harmonic voltage to the Pockels Cell,
then, the peak-peak value of the output voltage is given by 2
𝐶𝐹(X) = ∑𝑁 𝜈 𝜈
𝜈=1|𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑇ℎ𝑃𝑃 (X, 𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 ) − 𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑃𝑃 (𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 )| ,(8)
𝜋 𝜋 𝐴0 𝜋 𝜋 𝐴0
𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑇ℎ𝑃𝑃 = 𝑉0 [sin2 ( + ) − sin2 ( − )]. (5) where 𝑁 is the number of values of peak-peak voltage applied
4 2 𝑉𝜋⊥ 4 2 𝑉𝜋⊥
to Pockels cell in the experiment, and X is the vector of the
unknown parameters to estimate and it is defined as
TABLE I
B OUNDS AND STARTING POINTS FOR OPTIMIZATION PROCESS
Parameter Lower bound Upper bound Starting point
𝒙𝟏 0 100𝑚𝑎𝑥(𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑃𝑃 ) 𝑚𝑎𝑥(𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑃𝑃 )
Fig. 1. Transverse Pockels cell arrangement for measuring voltage by means 𝒙𝟐 𝜋⁄5 𝜋⁄3 𝜋⁄4
of the light intensity. In Fig., the orientation of the crystal is shown. 𝒙𝟑 𝑚𝑖𝑛(𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 ) 100𝑚𝑖𝑛(𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 ) 𝑚𝑖𝑛(𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 )
0018-9456 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2912590, IEEE
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a Transactions onthis
future issue of Instrumentation and Measurement
journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
output of the system. Finally, the analog outputs from the high
Finally, the optimization problem is defined as the voltage probe and buffer amplifier were plugged to an
minimization of 𝐶𝐹(X) defined in (8) respect to the vector X oscilloscope to visualize, measure and save the electrical
defined in (9), such that the bound constraints defined in Table signals.
1 are satisfied.
The proposed fitting procedure is based on the next five TABLE 2
PARAMETERS USED IN EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND THESE ARE TAKEN FOR
steps: THE THEORETICAL MODEL
1. Loading of the experimental data of 𝑉𝑎𝑝𝑃𝑃 and
𝑮 𝑺[𝒎𝑽/𝒎𝑾] 𝑷𝒊𝒏 [𝒎𝑾] 𝒇[𝑯𝒛]
𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑃𝑃 .
15 3.5 × 108 0.35 60
2. Construction of the cost function 𝐶𝐹(X) from (8).
3. Set bounds and starting points from Table 1.
4. Set options and implement Pattern Search algorithm.
Here, the Pattern Search algorithm returns the values
of the vector X that lead to the minimal value of the
cost function 𝐶𝐹(X).
5. Display the fitted theoretical peak-peak value of the
output voltage calculated with the X found above,
𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑇ℎ𝑃𝑃 , over experimental peak-peak value of the
output voltage, 𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑃𝑃 .
Matlab code is available in Supplemental Material, available
online.
0018-9456 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2912590, IEEE
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a Transactions onthis
future issue of Instrumentation and Measurement
journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
Fig. 5. Convergence and the total function evaluations of the Pattern Search
algorithm used in this work for the Pockels cells (a) A and (b) B, where
Function Value is the value of the cost function, defined in (8), and Total
Function Evaluations is the number of times that is evaluated such function.
Fig. 4. Pockels Cells (a) A and (b) B used in the experimental setup.
0018-9456 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2912590, IEEE
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a Transactions onthis
future issue of Instrumentation and Measurement
journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
modeled values can be observed, showing that the compared with the experimental output voltage captured in the
optimization resulted in a good solution. oscilloscope. Figs. 7 and 8 show the theoretical and
experimental output voltage in function of time for various
peak-peak AC voltage applied to the Pockels cells tested in
this work. Here also there is a high degree of agreement
between the measurement and modeled value of output
voltage in function of the time of the Pockels cells.
It can be observed that in Figs. 7 and 8, in special in Fig.
8(b), there is noise in the experimental curve and this is caused
by the signal-to-noise ratio is small, nevertheless, it is possible
to identify the behavior of the experimental signal and
compare it with the theoretical model.
Now, the model parameters in (10) and (11) obtained from
the optimization also were compared with theoretical values to
determine how well the optimization method works for
obtaining correct properties of the system. Only values for the
parameters 𝑥2 and 𝑥3 (phase introduced by the compensation
plate and half-wave voltage for the transversal Pockels cell
arrangement, respectively) were available. Then, the relative
errors can be calculated as
|𝜑𝑇ℎ −𝜑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 |
𝐸𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟(𝜑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 ) = × 100% (12)
𝜑𝑇ℎ
|𝑉𝜋⊥𝑇ℎ −𝑉𝜋⊥𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 |
𝐸𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟(𝑉𝜋⊥𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 ) = × 100%. (13)
𝑉𝜋⊥𝑇ℎ
Fig. 7. Calculed function, defined in (4), based on the estimated model
parameters in (10) obtained from optimization and experimental output Therefore, 𝐸𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟(𝜑𝐴 ) ≈ 0%, 𝐸𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟(𝜑𝐵 ) ≈ 0%,
voltage in function of time, when peak-peak AC voltages of (a) 6.000 kV and 𝐸𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟(𝑉𝜋⊥𝐴 ) ≈ 3.0885% and 𝐸𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟(𝑉𝜋⊥𝐵 ) ≈ 8.3247%.
(b) 0.440 kV are applied to the Pockels cell A.
Finally, we can estimate the insertion loss of the Pockels
cells A and B by means of (7). (10), (11) and Table 2: 𝛼𝑎 ≈
66.5777 𝑑𝐵𝑚 and 𝛼𝑏 ≈ 72.1890 𝑑𝐵𝑚.
0018-9456 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TIM.2019.2912590, IEEE
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a Transactions onthis
future issue of Instrumentation and Measurement
journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
0018-9456 (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.