Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Product Requirements
Skylar Ovnicek
Dwain Stucker
Austin Beyer
Hussain Em’ailo
Document History
Gearbox Overview
Objective
The purpose of the document is to present the requirements and tasks for a single speed gearbox
to be used and integrated into electronic/mechanical systems requiring an accurate rotation of an
axle.
Gearbox Purpose/Overview
The single speed gear box supplied by Tamiya was the assembly of our product analysis. The
overall assembly was pretty simple, consisting of several gear variations, a motor, a shaft, and an
axle.
This gearbox is designed to operate with simple/basic code applications and commands. One of
the most popular applications that this device is used with is the Software program, Arduino.
Once the appropriate commands are relayed to the motor that operates the gearbox, forces and
torques are then transferred through the gear train assembly to the output shaft.
Motor Driver and Input Shaft
The gear train is allowed to be altered by the customer into four different configurations to
deliver desired speed and torque outputs as needed. For this document, the gear train ratio of
344.2:1 was used.
Our analysis did not focus on the
motor that was used in the
assembly. However, it needs to
be noted for the axial forces that
are inputted to the gear train. At
no load, this motor shaft output
will operate at 12,300 RPM’s,
and will stall at a max input
torque of 36gf-cm (.031lbf-in).
Because it is not desirable for the
product to function that closely
to the stall point, the Figure 1: Display of the motor assembly in the gear configuration that this
manufactures appear to use a factor of document uses for analysis. Image from “Tamiya.com”
safety of about 6. This results in the input torque of approximately 6gf-cm. With our current gear
train assembly, this will lead to a shaft output of 38 RPM’s, and a stall torque of 2276gf-cm
(1.98lbf-in).
Figure 4: Assembly order is shown from left to right. The first gear is in contact with the crown gear and the
second blue gear shown in the center here. The second gear is then transferring forces and torque shown on the
third blue gear on the far right
Functional Requirements
torque and force delivered by the third blue gear
and transfer the forces and torque onto the gearbox
axle shaft
Mechanical Requirements
Strength Requirements
The motor shall be rated to the greatest torque specifications that will be supplied to the
consumer (Max Torque of 2276 gf-cm).
Spatial Requirements
The gearbox shall fit with in the following dimensions:
- Length < 7 cm
- Width < 4.5 cm (Not including axle drive)
- Height < 2.5 cm
One platform shall consist of a plain piece of material (wood, plastic, metal, etc.) that
will have 2.5mm holes pre drilled by the customer. The motor will then be able to be
mounted using two 3 x 8mm tapping screws provided.
The second mounting method will be with a project mounting plate with a various
amount of holes placed in the material. The gearbox will then be able to be mounted
using a 3 x 10mm screw and nut application to secure the gearbox
Electrical
Requirements
Operational Voltage
The supplied motor will need to run a voltage supply of 3V.
Software Requirements
Functionality
The goal of this product is to supplement electrical/mechanical systems such as Arduino and the
like.
User Interface
The gearbox functionality will depend on the capabilities of the customer to properly command
the gearbox/motor system for their desired purposes.
Regulatory Requirements
Shipping Requirements
The product shall be able to fit inside an 11cm x 14cm x 3cm box in its deconstructed state to
minimize the cost of shipping to the costumer
Cost Requirements
Purchasing Value
The purpose of this device is to provide a cheap and useful supplement to light duty projects and
experiments. As such, the charging cost to the consumer should not exceed $10.00 (US). This
goal shall be calculated in future planning for designing and development of this device.
S ys t e m Single Speed Gear Box Potential F M E A N um be r 3
S ubs ys t e m Gear Train Failure Mode and Effects Analysis P re pa re d B y Skylar Ovnicek
C o m po ne nt Gears/Lo ck Nut/A xle Shaft/ (Design FMEA) F M EA D ate 4/23/2019
D e s ign Le a d Skylar Ovnicek Ke y D a t e 4/23/2019 R e v is io n D a t e 4/23/2019
C o re T e a m Dwain Stucker, Austin Beyer, Hussain Emailo P a ge 1 of 1
A c t io n R e s ult s
P o t e nt ia l P R e s po ns ibilit y &
P o t e nt ia l S D R
P o t e nt ia l C a us e ( s ) / r C urre nt D e s ign R e c o m m e nde d T a rge t
C o m po ne nt It e m / F unc t io n Effect(s) e e P A c t io ns T a k e n
F a ilure M o de ( s ) M e c ha nis m ( s ) o C o nt ro ls A c t io n( s ) C o m ple t io n
o f F a ilure v t N
New Det
New Sev
New Occ
o f F a ilure b D ate
New RPN
Axle T orque Bending Uneven/ 6 Excessive 5 Axle supported 4 120 Sw itch for a Implement 6 2 4 48
Delivery to Inconsistant Loading by plastic strong material stronger
Consumers Delivery of casing on both axle 5/25/2019 material
application P ow er/T orque sides of gear
set
Gear T ransfering Excessive P ossible 6 P rolonged Use 5 P lastic gear, 4 120 Sw itch for Redesign of 5 2 4 40
dFEMA Report
T orque/P ow er Wear on T eeth failure to moderate tooth lightw eight Gears for
T hrough the transfer spacing metal higher
5/26/2019
Sytem torque/pow er gears/tigther tolerance and
properly tooth spacing w eight
reduction
Gear T ransfering Warping Inconsistant/ 6 Hot 3 P lastic gear, 4 72 Sw itch for Replace plastic 6 1 4 24
T orque/P ow er Deformation Failure to Enviroment/ casing vents lightw eight gears w ith
T hrough the Deliver Over Heating provide some metal gear 5/27/2019 metal gears
Sytem T orque/P ow er Due to air flow
P rolonged Use
Lock Nut T ransfering Becoming Fail to Deliver 5 Becoming 3 Fits snug to 4 60 Increase Design/use 5 1 4 20
T orque/P ow er Unlocked/ P ow er/T orque Stripped Due axle before number of Locknut w ith
from Gears to Unsecured to consumers to Over tightening threads to 5/28/2019 higher
Axle application T ightening increase numbers of
friction threads
Gear T ransfering Becoming Fail to Deliver 3 Debris 6 Gears are open 4 72 Add a plastic Addition of 3 2 4 24
T orque/P ow er Jammed/ P ow er/T orque entering to enviroment w indow to plastic
T hrough the Obstructed to consumers system due to elements from view gears 5/29/2019 w indow to
Sytem application exposed parts the top view w hile keeping design
debris out
Lock Nut Securing hex Becoming Fail to Secure 5 Becoming 4 Fits snug to 4 80 Increase depth Increase 5 2 4 40
Screw nut to axle Stripped/Lose Lock nut to Stripped Due axle before of screw depth/bite of
shaft shaft and fail to Over tightening thread 5/30/2019 screw
to deliver force T ightening
Gear T ransfer of Breaking or Fail to Deliver 8 Cold 1 Hard plastic 4 32 Sw itch for Use light 8 1 4 32
forces through Shattering of P ow er/T orque Enviroment/ w / resonable lightw eight w eight metal
system the gears to consumers Excessive rating metal gear gear instead of
5/31/2019
application Directional (undisclosed plastic
Changes material/rating
)
Cause/Controls Analysis and Recommendations
Component: Axle
RPN Number: 120
Because the axle is a core component of the gear box, the axle bending or becoming
deformed/dislodged would at best lead to inconsistent (skipping) performance, or at worst lead
to the self-destruction of the gear box assembly. Torque will always be a factor, so fatigue is
unavoidable, it’s the primary function of the axle to transmit loads, but the combination of
torqueing loads and gear reaction forces can cause the gearing to skip teeth which can lead to
premature failure and unsatisfactory performance. While errors in skipping provide visual and
audible warning, replacing the axle requires complete disassembly of the gearbox. Our
recommendations would be to perform a fatigue analysis of the axle as to discover at what
loads it is liable to start deforming, if the results shows fatigue during operating torques then a
stronger material should be chosen for the axle.
Reflection
What gave this product the higher RPN’s that were outliers from the other analyzed components
wasn’t the probability or detectability, but the potential severity that could occur if a failure did
occur. All of the components analyzed received the same score of 4 for detectability. This
particular single speed gearbox is designed to be very simple and easy for the consumer to use.
As a result of the devices simplicity, there are no built in controls to stop the gearbox from
functioning if a failure occurs. The design controls to anticipate possible failure conditions would
have to be left to the customer and the personal coding conditions the selected to incorporate
when using this device. Therefore, if the customer did design their code with parameters
accounting for failure modes, there might be a “chance the design control will detect potential
failure”.
During our analysis, we examined the output forces and torques on the output shaft of the gear
box assembly. However, we did not analyze the reaction forces from the plastic frame of the
gearbox that support the shaft and gears. Because of the various configurations that a customer
can implement the gearbox and different load amounts that could be reacted/transferred, we
didn’t not include the analysis that support the shaft.
It was noted in the Gearbox Overview under the Motor Driver and Input Shaft section that there
was a discrepancy in the driver motor section that there was a discrepancy in the driver motor
information that was referenced for analysis. It was concluded that the likely reason for this was
that a new motor delivering the same amount of torque may have been replaced with a motor that
provides a higher speed output. Our team believes this a logical assumption with reasoning that,
since the original availability of our gearbox to consumers, the original motor that was used is no
longer available for purchase. With the original motor no longer available, we believe that an
improved motor has replaced it, causing a discrepancy in the data that was released with the
initial product release.
An additional consequence of motor input discrepancies is seen in our FBD’s in this document.
Because of our FBD’s being made prior to this acknowledged inconsistency, the units do not
convert. Therefore, the units and inputs mentioned in the text (with the units of gf-cm) are
correct and the units in the FBD’s are incorrect. With this though, the unit inputs in the FBD’s do
follow the correct format and procedures for transfers/reactions that occur in our assembly, just
that the initial input units are incorrect.
Appendices
Single Speed Gearbox Part Drawings
Motor Gear
Crown Gear
Blue Gear
Hex-Gear
Hex-Shaft
Hex-Nut
References
Cited Documents
Tamiya Single Gearbox (4-Speed) instruction/assembly Manual.
Tamiya Educational Construction Series No. 167
(Figure 1)
“Pololu - Tamiya 980112M Mabuchi FA-130 Motor.” Pololu Robotics & Electronics, Pololu
Robotics & Electronics, 2019, www.pololu.com/product/77.
(Figure 6)