Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
It is generally accepted that the standard deck of playing cards we use for everything from
three-card monte to high-stakes Vegas poker evolved from the Tarot. “Like our modern
cards,” writes Sallie Nichols, “the Tarot deck has four suits with ten ‘pip’ or numbered cards
in each…. In the Tarot deck, each suit has four ‘court’ cards: King, Queen, Jack, and Knight.”
The latter figure has “mysteriously disappeared from today’s playing cards,” though
examples of Knight playing cards exist in the fossil record. The modern Jack is a survival of
the Page cards in the Tarot. (See examples of Tarot court cards here from the 1910 Rider-
Waite deck.) The similarities between the two types of decks are significant, yet no one but
adeptsseems to consider using their Gin Rummy cards to tell the future.
The eminent psychiatrist Carl Jung, however, might have done so.
As Mary K. Greer explains, in a 1933 lecture Jung went on at length about his views on the
Tarot, noting the late Medieval cards are "really the origin of our pack of cards, in which the
red and the black symbolize the opposites, and the division of the four—clubs, spades,
diamonds, and hearts—also belongs to the individual symbolism.
They are psychological images, symbols with which one plays, as the unconscious seems to
play with its contents.” The cards, said Jung, “combine in certain ways, and the different
combinations correspond to the playful development of mankind.” This, too, is how Tarot
works—with the added dimension of “symbols, or pictures of symbolical situations.” The
images—the hanged man, the tower, the sun—“are sort of archetypal ideas, of a
differentiated nature.”
Thus far, Jung hasn't said anything many orthodox Jungian psychologists would find
disagreeable, but he goes even further and claims that, indeed, “we can predict the future,
when we know how the present moment evolved from the past.” He called for “an intuitive
method that has the purpose of understanding the flow of life, possibly even predicting future
events, at all events lending itself to the reading of the conditions of the present moment.”
He compared this process to the Chinese I Ching, and other such practices. As analyst Marie-
Louise von Franz recounts in her book Psyche and Matter:
Jung suggested… having people engage in a divinatory procedure: throwing the I Ching,
laying the Tarot cards, consulting the Mexican divination calendar, having a transit
horoscope or a geometric reading done.
Content seemed to matter much less than form. Invoking the Swedenborgian doctrine of
correspondences, Jung notes in his lecture, “man always felt the need of finding an access
through the unconscious to the meaning of an actual condition, because there is a sort of
correspondence or a likeness between the prevailing condition and the condition of the
collective unconscious.”
What he aimed at through the use of divination was to accelerate the process of
“individuation,” the move toward wholeness and integrity, by means of playful combinations
of archetypes. As another mystical psychologist, Alejandro Jodorowsky, puts it, "the Tarot
will teach you how to create a soul." Jung perceived the Tarot, notes the blog Faena Aleph,
“as an alchemical game,” which in his words, attempts “the union of opposites.” Like the I
Ching, it “presents a rhythm of negative and positive, loss and gain, dark and light.”
Much later in 1960, a year before his death, Jung seemed less sanguine about Tarot and the
occult, or at least downplayed their mystical, divinatory power for language more suited to
the laboratory, right down to the usual complaints about staffing and funding. As he wrote in
a letter about his attempts to use these methods:
Later interpreters of Jung doubted that his experiments with divination as an analytical
technique would pass peer review. “To do more than ‘preach to the converted,’” wrote the
authors of a 1998 article published in the Journal of Parapsychology, “this experiment or any
other must be done with sufficient rigor that the larger scientific community would be
satisfied with all aspects of the data taking, analysis of the data, and so forth.” Or, one could
simply use Jungian methods to read the Tarot, the scientific community be damned.
You can see images of each of Wang’s cards here. His books purport to be exhaustive studies
of Jung’s Tarot theory and practice, written in consultation with Jung scholars in New York
and Zurich. Sallie Nichols’ Jung and Tarot: An Archetypal Journey is less voluminous and
innovative—using the traditional, Pamela Coleman-Smith-illustrated, Rider-Waite deck
rather than an updated original version. But for those willing to grant a relationship between
systems of symbols and a collective unconscious, her book may provide some penetrating
insights, if not a recipe for predicting the future.
Related Content:
Alejandro Jodorowsky Explains How Tarot Cards Can Give You Creative Inspiration