Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
END-OF-SEMESTER EXAMINATION
SEMESTER 1, 2014/2015 SESSION
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
REFERENCE(S) ALLOWED
Mr. Liam is the registered proprietor of a piece of land with a huge mansion erected on it.
On 13th April 2013, Mr. Liam deposited the original issue document of title (IDT) to his
land with Dollar & Cents Bank as a security for an overdraft facility granted by the bank
to him. Dollar & Cents Bank’s lawyers however, failed to enter any type of caveat on the
land.
On 11th May 2014, Mr. Liam entered into an agreement to sell the land to Hj. Soleh. Mr.
Liam explained the absence of the IDT by saying that he had lost it. He told Hj. Soleh
that he is in the process of applying for a new IDT. He however allowed Hj. Soleh to take
possession of the land if Hj. Soleh paid 50% towards the purchase price. The actual
transfer would be affected upon the receipt of the IDT from the land office. Hj. Soleh
paid the sum and took possession and moved into the house.
Mr. Liam procrastinated in transferring the land despite several requests by Hj. Soleh. Hj.
Soleh was advised by his friend that he should protect his claim by entering a caveat
against Mr. Liam’s interest. To his surprise Hj. Soleh found out that a Registrar’s Caveat
was entered on the title following an application made by the Inland Revenue Department
under paragraph (b)(i) and (ba) of section 320(1) of the National Land Code, 1965, on the
ground that Mr. Liam was owing a substantial amount of income tax to the department
for the past 3 years. The Registrar’s Caveat was entered on 6th July 2014.
2
On 25th August 2014, the Registrar served a notice on Mr. Liam informing him of the
entry of the caveat. Money & Cents Bank and Hj. Soleh want to know the following:
(i) Assume Hj. Soleh proceeded to enter a caveat on the land following his friend’s
advice, what kind of caveat is to be entered and why? And what would be the
(4 marks)
(ii) What would be the legal position of Money & Cents Bank?
(3 marks)
(iii) Whether the said Registrar’s Caveat was validly entered by the Registrar and
why?
(4 marks)
(iv) Whether Money & Cents Bank and Hj. Soleh can remove the said Registrar’s
Caveat?
(4 marks)
3
QUESTION 2
(a) Soon Finance had granted to Wan Ismail (“borrower”) a temporary overdraft
facility of $125,000 with interest at the rate of 14% per year. In support of that
facility, Nik Jamil on 17th January 2013 agreed to charge his property held under
land office title, identified as Lot 1572 Geran No.15325 Mukim Selayang,
that document, Nik Jamil had agreed to be jointly and severally liable for the loan.
Wan Ismail later defaulted on the terms of the facility agreement. Soon Finance
issued letters of demand to both, Wan Ismail and Nik Jamil. However, both of
them ignored the demand letters. To recover the debt, Soon Finance took
immediate steps to foreclose the charge. To their surprise, they discovered that the
Advise Soon Finance on the status of the charge and remedies that are available.
(7 marks)
(b) Assuming that the charge was registered and Soon Finance decides to take
(8 marks)
4
QUESTION 3
(a) Compare and contrast the functions of the Registrar in entering the different types
of caveat as prescribed in the National Land Code 1965. Support your answer
(7 marks)
(b) Hong Gay is a partner of a firm known as Hong Curtain and Furnishings since
1999. She managed the business with her sister Hong Kim for only two months.
After the registration of the firm, Hong Gay left for the United States sometime in
July 1999 and returned to Malaysia on August 2002. After some 11 years, she is
now a permanent resident there. Meanwhile, Hong Kim managed the business of
the firm.
Before Hong Gay left Malaysia, she bought and became the registered proprietor
of a piece of land in Mukim Gombak. Since she left Malaysia before the title to
the said land was issued, she entrusted to her sister the responsibility of keeping
5
While she was away in the United States, Zack, the manager of the firm,
deposited the IDT of Hong Gay’s land to Bank Mekar to secure a loan granted to
When Hong Gay questioned Zack, he claimed that he has been authorised by
Hong Kim to arrange for the said loan. Besides that he also claimed that he is a
partner to the firm. Bank Mekar entered a lien holder’s caveat accordingly.
The firm’s business was not doing well due to heavy competition and
wanted to exercise its right under the National Land Code 1965 after the Notice of
Demand issued by their solicitor was ignored by the company. Hong Gay was
Advise Hong Gay and Bank Mekar on their rights in the above situation. Support
(8 marks)
6
QUESTION 4
(a) Discuss the rationale for introducing land reservation for the benefit of a
(8 marks)
(b) Hj. Jais was the registered proprietor of a Malay Reserved land in Kuala Selangor.
In 2009, he sold the land to Wak Karman, an Indonesian citizen who had settled
in the village for a number of years. This sale was evidenced by a written
agreement where the land was sold for RM50,000. The land however, remained in
the name of Hj. Jais until he passed away in 2013. His son, Mohd. Jamil, who is
the administrator of his father’s estate, wishes to bring an action against Wak
Karman to vacate the said land. Wak Karman argues that based on the written
agreement between himself and Mohd. Jamil’s father, he is now the lawful owner
of the land. Mohd. Jamil however argues that since Wak Karman is not a
Malaysian citizen, the said agreement is null and void. Advise both parties as to
whether the sale of the Malay Reserved land to Wak Karman is valid having
regard to the provisions of the FMS Malay Reservation Enactment (Cap. 142) and
decided cases.
(7 marks)
7
QUESTION 5
Despite, the guaranteed protection for private landowners’ property rights by the Federal
Constitution 1957 of Malaysia, the existence of the Land Acquisition Act 1960 that
provides the State Authority with wide powers to acquire land belonging to private
rights to property.
Discuss with reference to decided cases, the rationale behind the power of acquiring land
compulsorily by the State Authority and if there are any grounds upon which the
(15 marks)
QUESTION 6
(a) Building high-rise accommodation has resolved the immediate needs of housing.
due to the fact that the high-rise building is built on a land with one Master title.
(8 marks)
(7 marks)