OPCRF SH2019 Final Corrected

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: NOEL G. TUNGUIA Name of Rater: CORAZON C. TINGSON, CESE

Position: School Principal II Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: School Year 2018 - 2019 Date of Review Period:
Division: Antique
Weight per
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA (%)
25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 5-Outstanding
GSA performance is 81 to
Basic A. June to March 100%, Failure rate is 0-5%, 0-
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the 2% Non-Readers and 0-2 %
n Leadership learning outcomes of Non-Numerates
Services the school by ( All indicators are within the 50 - 100% of the learners per grade level
specified targets) achieved 80-100% GSA Failure Rate is 5%
achieving 80% GSA and less, Non Readers and Non
Performance of 50% Numerates decreased by 10% from the
baseline
of the learners per ( All indicators are within the specified
grade level and 10% targets)
and above NAT at the
end of the school year
4-Very Satisfactory
Accounted for learning outcomes of Year Round 100%, Failure rate is 0-5%, 0-
the school viz-a-viz goals and SY 2018- 2% Non-Readers and 0-2 %
Non-Numerates 50 - 100% of the learners per grade level
targets 2019 ( Only 3 of the indicators are achieved 80-100% GSA, and Failure Rate
met) is 5% and less, Non Readers and Non
Instructional Numerates decreased by 10% from the
Leadership baseline
( Only 3 of the indicators are met)
DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 3-Satisfactory
Basic A. June to March 100%, Failure rate is 0-5%, 0-
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the 2% Non-Readers and 0-2 %
n Leadership learning outcomes of Non-Numerates
Services the school by ( Only 2 of the indicators are
met)
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10%
50 - 100% of the learners per grade
end of the school year level achieved 80-100% GSA, and
Failure Rate is 5% and less, Non
Readers and Non Numerates
decreased by 10% from the baseline
( Only 2 of the indicators are met)
2-Unsatisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 GSA performance is 81 to
100%, Failure rate is 0-5%, 0-
Basic A. June to March 2% Non-Readers and 0-2 %
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the Non-Numerates
( Only 1 of the indicators are
n Leadership learning outcomes of met)
Services the school by
achieving 80% GSA
50 - 100% of the learners per grade
Performance of 50% level achieved 80-100% GSA, and
of the learners per Failure Rate is 5% and less, Non
grade level and 10% Readers and Non Numerates
and above NAT at the decreased by 10% from the baseline
end of the school year ( Only 1 of the indicators are met)
1-Poor

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1
Basic A. June to March

Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the
n Leadership learning outcomes of
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per 50 - 100% of the learners per grade
grade level and 10% level achieved 80-100% GSA, and
and above NAT at the Failure Rate is 5% and less, Non
100%, Failure rate is 0-5%, 0- Readers and Non -Numerates
end of the school year 2% Non-Readers and 0-2 % decreased by 10% from the baseline
Non-Numerates ( None of the indicators are met)
Performed instructional supervision

to achieve learning outcomes Year Round 5-Outstanding
SY 2018-
2019

Weight per
Performed instructional supervision KRA (%)
to achieve learning outcomes Year Round 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 SY 2018-
2019
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per Performed Instructional
grade level and 10% Supervision observing 5
and above NAT at the basic requirements:
end of the school year -a.collected /analyzed 81-
100% pre -observation form
-
6 requirements of instructional
b.prepared supervision have been performed and
monthly Instructional met
Supervision - c. conducted
Instructional Supervision -
d. provided
coaching/ mentoring
_ e. scheduled follow-
up observation
4-Very Satisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1
5 requirements of Instruction Supervision
Basic A. June to March 5 requirement satisfied
have been performed and met
Services the school by 3-Satisfactory
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per 4 requirements of Instruction Supervision
4 requirement satisfied
grade level and 10% have been performed and met
end of the school year 2-Unsatisfactory
3 requirement satisfied
3 requirements of Instruction Supervision have

been performed and met
1-Poor
At least 2 requirements of Instruction

At least 2 requirement satisfied Supervision have been performed and
met
Managed the process in monitoring Year Round 5-Outstanding

student achievement and identify SY 2018 -
intervention to improve students’ 2019
performance

Weight per
KRA (%)
Managed the process in monitoring Year Round 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 student achievement and identify SY 2018 - Performed students’
intervention to improve students’ 2019 performance tracking process
Basic and provided interventions to
A. performance June to March improve such observing the
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the following requirements:
a Prepared/ Consolidated
achieving 80% GSA Subject Area Performance
Performance of 50% Report
of the learners per
grade level and 10% b. Prepared Report on Students
at Risk of Dropping Out
end of the school year c. Designed/ implemented
varied interventions to address
issues on Students
performance and SARDO 5 tracking processes and interventions
d. Documented SHS Students mechanism satisfied
Immersion Portfolio
e. Designed/ Implemented
ADM systems
4-Very Satisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1

Services the school by 5 tracking processes and interventions
4 processes satisfied
achieving 80% GSA mechanism satisfied
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10%
3-Satisfactory
5 tracking processes and interventions

3 processes satisfied mechanism satisfied
2-Unsatisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1

Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the 5 tracking processes and interventions
n 2 processes satisfied mechanism satisfied
Leadership learning outcomes of
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per 1-Poor
grade level and 10%
5 tracking processes and interventions
1 process satisfied mechanism satisfied

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1

achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10%
Learning Provided safe and child friendly Year Round 5- Outstanding

Environment learning environment for students/ SY 2018- 15 %
learners within the school year by 2019
implementing school based
mechanisms and by utilizing varied
ancillary services

Weight per
KRA (%)
Learning Provided safe and child friendly Year Round 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 Environment learning environment for students/ SY 2018- 15 % Practiced in school the All 6 indicators in item 1 and
learners within the school year by 2019 following learning support
mechanism:
all 10 indicators in item 2 are
Basic A. implementing school based June to March evident and satisfied
a. School Based Child
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted
mechanisms forby
and theutilizing varied Protection Policy
n Leadership learning outcomes
ancillary services of b. School Based Disaster
Services the school by Risk Reduction Management
c. Gender and Development
achieving 80% GSA d. SBM WINS
Performance of 50% e. Waste Management
of the learners per
grade level and 10% f. Health services
(deworming, immunization,
and above NAT at the feeding program, school
end of the school year clinic, school canteen
hygiene, nutritional status)
2. Evident in school
functionality of the following
ancillary services:
a. School Canteen
b. Library
c. Computer /IT laboratory
d. Comfort rooms,
e. Guidance Office
f. Faculty Room
g. School Clinic
h. Water System
i. Administrative Office
j. Landscaping/ study sheds
( All 6 indicators in item 1
and all 10 indicators in item 2
are evident)
4- Very Satisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 Only 5 indicators in Only 5 indicators in item 1 and
item 1 and only 8 -9 only 8 indicators in item 2 are
Basic A. June to March indicators in item 2 are evident and satisfied
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the evident
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10%
3-Satisfactory
Only 4 indicators in Only 4 indicators in item 1 and

indicators in item 2 are evident and satisfied
evident
2-Unsatisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 Only 3 indicators in Only 3 indicators in item 1 and
Basic A. June to March indicators in item 2 are evident and satisfied
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the evident
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per 1-Poor
grade level and 10% At least 2 indicators in At least 2 indicators in item 1
and above NAT at the item 1 and at least 1-2 and at least 2 indicators in
end of the school year indicators in item 2 are item 2 are evident and
evident satisfied
5- Outstanding
10 ancillary facilities All functional

existed
8-9 ancillary facilities Only 8-9 facilities/ services

existed functional
3- Satisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 7-8 ancillary facilities Only 7-8 facilities/ services
existed functional
achieving 80% GSA 2- Unsatisfactory
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10% 4-6 ancillary facilities Only 4-6 facilities/ services
and above NAT at the existed functional
end of the school year 1- Poor
1-3 ancillary facilities Only 1-3 facilities/ services

existed functional
Maintained disaster free school

environment
5-Outstanding

Maintained disaster free school
environment
Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 Practiced in school the
following DRRM Mechanism:
Basic A. June to March a. Organized functional
Educatio Instructional SDRRM Committee
A.1 Accounted for the b. Crafted SDRRM Plan
n Leadership learning outcomes of c. Organized functional
Services the school by Students SDRRM Committee
achieving 80% GSA (BERT)
Performance of 50% d. Conducted fire,
All 5 indicators done
earthquake or other
of the learners per
disaster related drills
grade level and 10% e. Presence of warning
and above NAT at the signs, hazards map, DRRM
end of the school year related tools and equipment
(all 5 indicators are
satisfied)
4-Very Satisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1

achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50% Only 4 indicators are
Only 4 indicators are done
of the learners per satisfied
grade level and 10%
3-Satisfactory
Only 3 indicators are

Only 3 indicators are satisfied
satisfied

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1
Basic 2-Unsatisfactory
A. June to March
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10% Only 2 indicators are satisfied
satisfied
1-Poor

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1

achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per Only 1 indicator is
Only 1 indicator is done
grade level and 10% satisfied
Ensured health, safety, security and

protection of the learners, teachers 5-Outstanding
and school properties and facilities

Weight per
Ensured health, safety, security and KRA (%)
protection of the learners, teachers 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 and school properties and facilities
Evident in school the
following:
Basic A. June to March a. Sufficient potable
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the water
n Leadership learning outcomes of b. permanent
Services the school by perimeter fence
achieving 80% GSA c. hired security
Performance of 50% personnel
of the learners per d. School health
grade level and 10% programs All 5 indicators done
and above NAT at the e. School Canteen
end of the school year health protocol ( as per
Deped Order 54, s.
2007)
(all 5 indicators are
satisfied)
4-Very Satisfactory

satisfied

Weight per
KRA (%)
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10% Only 3 indicators are
and above NAT at the satisfied
2-Unsatisfactory

satisfied
1-Poor

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1

n Leadership learning outcomes of Only 1 indicator is
Services Only 1 indicator is done
the school by satisfied
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10%
Human and above
Provided NAT at the
technical assistance to Year Round 20%
Resources And end of the school year
teachers on matters pertaining to SY 2018 -
Management
5-Outstanding
enhancement of classroom 2019
management, skills and
instructional competence and to
non-teaching personnel for support
services within the RPMS Cycle

Weight per
MFO's HumanKRA's OBJECTIVES
Provided technical assistance to TIMELINE
Year Round 20% Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA (%)
Resources And teachers on matters pertaining to SY 2018 -
Management enhancement of classroom 2019 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 management, skills and Evident in school are
instructional competence and to the following technical
Basic A. non-teaching personnel for support June to March Evident in school are
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted
services within for
thethe
RPMS Cycle the following technical
n Leadership learning outcomes of assistance mechanism
Services the school by a. Crafted School
achieving 80% GSA Technical Assistance
Performance of 50% Plan
of the learners per b. Prepared Coaching
grade level and 10% and Mentoring Tool
and above NAT at the c. 80-100% of the
end of the school year target teachers and 80-100% of the target
non -teaching teachers and non -teaching
personnel are coached personnel are coached and
and mentored mentored
d. Conducted follow –
up coaching and
mentoring
( all indicators are met)
4-Very Satisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 80-100% of the target
teachers and non
Basic A. June to March -teaching personnel
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the are coached and
n Leadership learning outcomes of mentoreAt least 2 -3 61-80% of teachers and non
Services the school by indicators are met teaching personnel increased
achieving 80% GSA 60 – 80 % of the target in performance in Key Result
Performance of 50% teachers and non – Areas , Core Behavioral Skills
of the learners per teaching personnel are and Core Skills
grade level and 10% coached and mentored
3-Satisfactory
At least 2 indicators
are met
40 – 60% of the target 40 – 60 % of the target
teachers and non teachers and non -teaching
-teaching staff are personnel are coached and
coached and mentored mentored
2-Unsatisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 At least 1-2 indicators
are met
Basic A. June to March 20- 40% of the target 20 -40 % of the target
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the teachers and staff are teachers and non -teaching
n Leadership learning outcomes of coached and mentored personnel are coached and
Services the school by mentored
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50% 1-Poor
of the learners per
grade level and 10% At least 1 indicator is
and above NAT at the met
end of the school year Below 20% of the
target teachers and
non –teaching staff are
coached and mentored
Below 20% of the target
teachers and non -teaching
personnel are coached and
mentored
Sustained the conduct of Self- Year Round

Assessment Tool (SAT) to SY 2018-2019 5-Outstanding
determine the Teachers
Development Needs and
implemented appropriate
interventions within the school year

Weight per
Sustained the conduct of Self- Year Round KRA (%)
Assessment Tool (SAT) to SY 2018-2019 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 determine the Teachers Performed the All 4 indicators are performed
Development Needs and following in school:
Basic A. implemented appropriate June to March a. Conducted Self –
Educatio Instructional interventions within
A.1 Accounted for thethe school year Assessment using the
n Leadership learning outcomes of SAT
Services the school by b. Analyzed Teachers
achieving 80% GSA Development Needs
Performance of 50% c. Individual
of the learners per Development Plan
grade level and 10% prepared
and above NAT at the d. Prepared School
end of the school year Professional Plan for
Development
( All 4 indicators are

evident)
4-Very Satisfactory
Only 3 indicators are Only 3 indicators are
evident performed
3-Satisfactory
Only 2 indicators are Only 2 indicators are
evident performed.
2-Unsatisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1
Basic A. June to March Only 1 indicator is evident Only 1 indicator is performed

Services the school by 1-Poor
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50% No indicator No indicator is performed
of the learners per
grade level and 10%
Organized/conducted school based Year Round 5- Outstanding
teaching and non-teaching SY 2018-2019 Evident in school are All 5 indicators are evident
professional development the following:
mechanism a. Semestral and
Summer INSET Plan
b. School Wide
Learning Action Cell
Implementation Plan
c. INSET Monitoring
and Evaluation Tool
d. Learning Action Cell
Feedback Report Tool
e. 90-100% of the
teachers attended the
INSET/SLAC
( All indicators are met)

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 Only 4 indicators are Only 4 indicators are evident
met
3- Satisfactory
Services the school by Only 3 indicators are Only 3 indicators are evident
achieving 80% GSA met
Performance of 50%
of the learners per 2- Unsatisfactory
grade level and 10% Only 2 indicators are Only 2 indicators are evident
and above NAT at the met
1- Poor
Only 1 indicator is met Only 1 indicator is evident
Parents' Established school, family, and Year Round 15% 5-Outstanding

involvement community partnership SY 2018 –
and community 2019
partnership

Weight per
KRA (%)
Parents' Established school, family, and Year Round 15%
MFO 1 involvement community partnership SY 2018 –
and community Conducted the Satisfied all 5 indicators
2019
partnership following:
Basic A. June to March a. Organized PTA
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the Executive Officers and
n Leadership learning outcomes of Board of Directors
Services the school by b. Organized
achieving 80% GSA Homeroom PTA Officers
Performance of 50% c. Conducted 4
of the learners per quarterly PTA general
grade level and 10% assembly
and above NAT at the d. 80-100% attendance
end of the school year of parents during
General Assembly
All 4 indicators are met
4-Very Satisfactory
Only 3 indicators are Only 3 indicators are satisfied
met
3-Satisfactory
Only 3 indicators are satisfied
2-Unsatisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 Only 2 indicators are satisfied

Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the 1-Poor
n Leadership learning outcomes of Conducted 2 general Only 1 indicator is satisfied
Services the school by PTA assembly meetings
achieving 80% GSA in a school year
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10%
Generated resources for school Year Round

improvement/ facilities/ equipment SY 2018-2019
from stakeholders and donors 5-Outstanding
within the school year
Big school- 200,000 and

above Medium school
-100,000 – 199,000
Small school – 50,000 – 99,000

Generated resources for school Year Round Weight per
improvement/ facilities/ equipment SY 2018-2019 KRA (%)
from stakeholders and donors 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 within the school year Presence of the Generated 81-100% needed
following: resources for the identified
Basic A. Big school- 200,000 and June to March a. AIP/Project projects in the AIP within the
Educatio Instructional above
A.1 Accounted for theMedium school Proposal/Deed of SY
n Leadership -100,000 – 199,000of
learning outcomes donations /Program of
Services Small
the school
school by – 50,000 – 99,000 work.
achieving 80% GSA b. List of
Performance of 50% Partners/donors
of the learners per c. Committees to
grade level and 10% handle the projects
and above NAT at the organized.
end of the school year d. Project
Accomplishment
Report.
(All 4 indicators are
present)
4-Very Satisfactory
Only 3 indicators are Generated at least 61-80%
present needed resources for the
identified projects in the AIP
within the SY
3-Satisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 Only 3 indicators are Generated at least 41-60
present needed resources for the
Basic A. June to March identified projects in the AIP
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the within the SY
achieving 80% GSA 2-Unsatisfactory
Performance of 50%
of the learners per Only 2 indicators are Generated at least 21-40K
grade level and 10% present needed resources for the
and above NAT at the identified projects in the AIP
end of the school year within the SY
1-Poor
Only 1 indicator is Generated at least 10K and
present below needed resources for
the identified projects in the
AIP within the SY
Established and implemented Mar-19

award mechanismto perfoming
students, teachers, parents and
other stokeholders in a school year

Weight per
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES
Established and implemented TIMELINE
Mar-19 Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA (%)
award mechanismto perfoming
students, teachers, parents and 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 other stokeholders in a school year
5-Outstanding
n Leadership learning outcomes of The following are
Services the school by evident:
achieving 80% GSA a. Award Mechanics for
Performance of 50% Students
of the learners per ( DepEd Order )
grade level and 10% b. Award Mechanics for
and above NAT at the Teachers and Staff
end of the school year c. Award Mechanics for
Awards given for qualified students,
Parents parents, teachers and staff and
d. Award Mechanics for stakeholders
Partners/ Stakeholders
e. Organized Awards
Committee
( All 5 indicators are
met)
4 - Very Satisfactory
At least 4 requirements Missed 1 of the requirements

are met
3-Satisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 At least 3 requirements Missed 2 of the requirements
are met
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per 2-Unsatisfactory
grade level and 10%
At least 2 requirements Missed 3 of the requirements
are met
1-Poor
Only 1 requirement is Missed 4 of the requirements

met
Shool Leadership, Initiated and implemented School Year Round 20%

mangement and
Operation Improvement Plan collaboratively SY 2018-2019 5-Outstanding
by the stakeholders and the school
community

Weight per
Shool Leadership, Initiated and implemented School Year Round KRA
20%(%)
mangement and
Operation Improvement Plan collaboratively SY 2018-2019 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 by the stakeholders and the school
Performed the
community
following processes:
Basic A. June to March a. Conducted Year-End
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the Review of the Previous
n Leadership learning outcomes of SIP/AIP
Services the school by b. Organized School
achieving 80% GSA Planning Team
Performance of 50% c. Gathered data
of the learners per d. Crafted the updated 81-100% of the prioritized PPA in the AIPs
grade level and 10% SIP/AIP implemented/ completed
and above NAT at the (All 4 requirements are
end of the school year met)
4-Very Satisfactory
Only 3 requirements 61-80% of the prioritized PPA
are met in the AIPs implemented/
completed
3-Satisfactory

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 Only 2 requirements 41-60% of the prioritized PPA
are met in the AIPs implemented/
Basic A. June to March completed
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per 2-Unsatisfactory
grade level and 10% Only 1 requirement is 21-40% of the prioritized PPA
and above NAT at the met in the AIPs implemented/
end of the school year completed
1-Poor
No requirement 1-20% of the prioritized PPA in
the AIPs implemented/
completed
Organized Functional clubs and

other school organizations and 5-Outstanding
implrmrnted action plans that
ptomotes shared leadership

Weight per
Organized Functional clubs and KRA (%)
other school organizations and 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 implrmrnted action plans that Evident are the 81- 100% accomplishments of
ptomotes shared leadership following: school clubs/ organization
Basic A. June to March a. Organized School initiated programs and
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the Clubs and other projects
n Leadership learning outcomes of recognized
Services the school by organizations
achieving 80% GSA b. Approved action
Performance of 50% plans of each club/
of the learners per organization
grade level and 10% c. Approved
and above NAT at the projects/programs
end of the school year initiated by each club/
organization
d. Implemented/
initiated programs/
projects
e. Approved
Accomplishment
Report of each club/
organization
( All 5 requirements are
evident)
Year Round
SY 2018-2019
4 - Very Satisfactory
Only 4 requirements 61- 80% accomplishments of
are evident school clubs/ organization
initiated programs and
projects

Year Round
SY 2018-2019
Weight per
KRA (%)
Only 3 requirements 41 – 60% accomplishments of
Basic A. June to March are evident school clubs/ organization
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the initiated programs and
n Leadership learning outcomes of projects 2-Unsatisfactory
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50% Only 2 requirements 21 – 40% accomplishments of
of the learners per are evident school clubs/ organization
grade level and 10% initiated programs and
and above NAT at the projects
end of the school year Retention rate - 70-79%
Graduation rate - 70-79%
1-Poor
Only 1 requirement is 1 -20% accomplishments of

evident school clubs/ organization
initiated programs and
projects
Performed school leadership in Year Round

management, operation and SY 2018-2019 5-Outstanding
utilization of resources, MOOE, and
other school funds

Weight per
Performed school leadership in Year Round KRA (%)
management, operation and SY 2018-2019 25% Quality Efficiency
MFO 1 utilization of resources, MOOE, and Evident are the
other school funds following:
Basic A. June to March a. Approved Annual
Educatio Instructional A.1 Accounted for the Improvement Plan
n Leadership learning outcomes of b. Approved Annual
Services the school by Procurement Plan
achieving 80% GSA c. Approved Quarterly
Performance of 50% Liquidation Report
of the learners per d. Approved School
grade level and 10% Site Development Plan Performed all 5 processes
and above NAT at the e. AIP Accomplishment
end of the school year Report
(All 5 requirements are
evident)
4-Very Satisfactory
Only 4 requirements Only 4 processes are
are evident performed
3-Satisfactory
Only 3 requirements Only 3 processes are
are evident performed
2-Unsatisfactory
Only 2 requirements
Only 2 processes are performed
are evident
1-Poor

Weight per
KRA (%)
MFO 1 Only 1 requirement is
Only 1 process is performed
evident
ServicesPLUS FACTOR the school by
achieving 80% GSA
Performance of 50%
of the learners per
grade level and 10%
Rater Rater

ACTUAL RATING
ncy, Timeliness) Actual Results SCORE
Q E T A
Timeliness
Quarterly GSA performance

report prepared/reported a
week after the end of the
quarter, Failure Rate, Non -
Readers and Non -Numerates
are reflected in the SMEA
within the prescribed period of
time
( All indicators are met within
the prescribed time)

Readers and Non -Numerates
are reflected in the SMEA
within the prescribed period of
time
( Only the first indicator’s

targeted time is met)

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness

Readers and Non
-Numerates are reflected in
the SMEA within the
prescribed period of time
( Only the second indicator’s

5 5 5 5.00

5 ACTUAL
5 RATING
5 5.00
Q E T A
Timeliness
Readers and Non
the SMEA within the
( None of the indicator’s


ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Readers and Non
the SMEA within the
( None of the indicator’s


ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Prepared/submitted IS
accomplishment report on
or before first week of the
following month
1.25
5 5 5 5.00

5 5 5 5.00
ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Prepared/Submitted IS
accomplishment report two weeks
after the set deadline
accomplishment report three
weeks after the set deadline
accomplishment report four
weeks after the set deadline
accomplishment report 1
month or more after the
deadline

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Presented/ Reported
Students Academic
Performance Status and
Interventions Mechanism
for 4 quarters

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Presented/ Reported
Students Academic
for only 3 quarters
5 5 5 5.00
Presented/ Reported Students

Academic Performance Status and
Interventions Mechanism for only
2 quarters

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Presented/ Reported
Students Academic
for only 1 quarter
Not Presented/ Reported

Students Academic
Interventions Mechanism at
all

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Report on the existence and
utilization of mechanism and
ancillary services are
reported within the school
year

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Existence and utilization of
mechanism and ancillary
services are reported 1st
week of May 2019
5 5 5 5.00

services are reported 2nd
week of May 2019

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
services are reported 3rd
week of May 2019

services are reported 4th
week of May 2019
5 5 5.00
ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
5 5 5.00

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
SDRRM Drill and practices are

reported every end of the quarter
0.75

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
0.75
Only 3 quarters of the SDRRM Drill

and practices are reported
5 5 5 5.00
Only 2 quarters of the SDRRM Drill

and practices are reported

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Only 1 quarter of the SDRRM Drill

and practices is reported

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
None of the quarters is reported

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
SDRRM Drill and

practices are reported
every end of the
quarter
Only 3 quarters of the

SDRRM Drill and

5 5 5 5.00
ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
5 5 5 5.00
Only 2 quarters of the

SDRRM Drill and
Only 1 quarter of the

SDRRM Drill and
practices is reported

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
None of the quarters is

reported

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
5 5 5.00

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
1.00

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
1.00
5 5 5.00

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Meet the following:

a. Submitted INSET
plan before the
schedule
b.
Submitterd SLAC plan
witnin a minth of June
c. Submitted INSET
accomplishment
report atleast 2 weeks
after the activity
d.
Submitted SLAC
portfolio atleast
before the end of the
school year
(All 4 indicators are

met)
5 5 5 5.00

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness 5 5 5 5.00
Missed 1 indicator
Missed 2 indicators
Missed 3 indicators
Missed 4 indicators

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Conducted meeting as
scheduled in the
school calendar
(As per
Dep Ed Order)
Q- Conduted 4 General PTA

assembly meetings and 2
community outreach
programs in a school year
3-4 days deviation E-
81%-100% parents
attendance and 5 5 5 5.00
involvement of concernced
with 81%-100% meeting
objectives achieved
5-6 days’ deviation T- Conducted meeting as
schedule in the shool year
calendar (Dep Ed Order)

E-
81%-100% parents
attendance and 5 5 5 5.00
involvement of concernced
with 81%-100% meeting
objectives achieved ACTUAL RATING
ncy, Timeliness) Actual Results
T- Conducted meeting as SCORE
schedule in the shool year Q E T A
Timeliness calendar (Dep Ed Order)
7- 8 days’ deviation
9- 10 days or more deviation

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
5 5 5.00
0.75

5 ACTUAL
5 RATING 5.00
Q E T A
Timeliness
0.75

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
5 5 5.00

5 5 5.00
ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Implemented on schedule
specified in AIP
Implemented one month after the

schedule specified in AIP 5 5 5 5.00

5 5 5 5.00
ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Implemented 2 months after the

schedule specified in AIP
Submitted the review forms 3

months after the target date.
Submitted the review

forms 4 months and
after the target date.

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
Q - 2.01-2.5 SBM level of
practice
E - Adherence to standards
Access:
Enrollment -0.1 -1.9%
increase Drop out- .
0.1-.1 % decrease
Quality:
Promotion rate - 90-99%
NAT Performance - % 1.1-2
% increase in MPS
Literacy rate - 90-99%
Failure rate - 0.1-2%
Completion rate - 90-99%
Retention rate - 90-99%
Graduation rate - 90-99%
1.00
5 5 5.00

5 5 5.00
ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
5 5 5.00

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
Timeliness
KRA RATING 4.75

0.25
Over-All Rating for Accomplishments 5.0
Approving Authority

Organizational Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: Name of Rater: MA. ROSELYN J. PALCAT, EdD, CESO V
Position: Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: Date of Review Period: 7-Apr-17
Division:
Weight per Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, ACTUAL RATING

MFO's KRA's Objectives TIMELINE Actual Results
KRA (%) Timeliness)
Q E T
Quality Efficiency Timeliness
Weight per Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, ACTUAL RATING
MFO's KRA's Objectives TIMELINE Actual Results
KRA (%) Timeliness)
Q E T
Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5 - GSA performance is 81 5- 50 - 100% of the 5 -Quarterly GSA
to 100% and NAT 10% and learners per grade level performance report
above increased from the achieved 80-100% GSA prepared/submitted week
base line data and NAT 10% and above after the end of the
4 - GSA Performance is increased from the quarter
61 to 80% and NAT 7-9% baseline data 4-
increased from the base 40 - 49% of the learners
line data. 3- per grade level achieved
GSA Performance is 41 to 80-100% GSA and 7-9%
60% and NAT 4-6% NAT increased from the
increased from the base base line data
line data. 2- 3-30 - 39% of
GSA Performance is 21 to the learners per grade
40% and NAT 1-3% level achieved 80-100%
increased from the base GSA and 4-6% NAT
line data 1- increased from the base
GSA Performance is 1 to line data
Accounted for learning outcomes 20% and NAT below 1% 2-20 - 29% of the
of the school achieveing 80% GSA increased from the base learners per grade level
Instructional performance of 50% of the learnes June 2016 - March, line data achieved 80-100% GSA
leadership per grade level and 20 % and 2017 and 1-3% NAT increased
above ath the end of the school from the base line data
year 1-20 - 29% of
the learners per grade
level achieved 80-100%
GSA and below 1% NAT
increased from the base
line data
P.1
ATING
SCORE
A

OPCRF SH2019 Final Corrected

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

OPCRF SH2019 Final Corrected

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: NOEL G. TUNGUIA Name of Rater: CORAZON C. TINGSON, CESE

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Basic A. June to March

Performed instructional supervision

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

3 requirements of Instruction Supervision have

At least 2 requirements of Instruction

Managed the process in monitoring Year Round 5-Outstanding

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Basic A. June to March

5 tracking processes and interventions

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Basic A. June to March

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Basic A. June to March

Learning Provided safe and child friendly Year Round 5- Outstanding

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Only 4 indicators in Only 4 indicators in item 1 and

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

10 ancillary facilities All functional

8-9 ancillary facilities Only 8-9 facilities/ services

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

1-3 ancillary facilities Only 1-3 facilities/ services

Maintained disaster free school

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Basic A. June to March

Only 3 indicators are

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Basic A. June to March

Ensured health, safety, security and

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Only 4 indicators are

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Only 2 indicators are

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Basic A. June to March

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Sustained the conduct of Self- Year Round

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

( All 4 indicators are

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Basic A. June to March Only 1 indicator is evident Only 1 indicator is performed

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Parents' Established school, family, and Year Round 15% 5-Outstanding

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Basic A. June to March

Generated resources for school Year Round

Big school- 200,000 and

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template

Established and implemented Mar-19

DepEd Region VI-OPCRF Template