Sunteți pe pagina 1din 35

Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional

DESIGN SHEET Development


Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

35.00 M SPAN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE AASHTO GIRDER

A. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS

1. CONCRETE
Unit weight of structural concrete, gc = 23.56 kN/m³
Unit weight of wearing surface, gws = 22.00 kN/m³
Compressive strength:
Prestress concrete at transfer, f'ci = 35.00 Mpa
Prestress concrete 28th day, f'c = 41.00 Mpa
Cast-in-place concrete 28th day, f'cs = 28.00 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete, Ec = 0.043K1gc1.5√f'c (…DGCS 12.1.1.4-1)
Prestress concrete at transfer, Eci = 29941 Mpa
Prestress concrete 28th day, Ec = 32406 Mpa
Cast-in-place concrete 28th day, Ecs = 26780 Mpa

2. NON PRESTRESSED REINFORCING STEEL


Yield strength of steel: fy
Main reinforcement = 414.00 Mpa
Stirrups = 275.00 Mpa
Modulus of elasticity of steel, Es = 200000.00 Mpa
Stirrup diameter = 12.00 mm
Stirrup Area (two legged) = 226.19 mm2

3. PRESTRESSING STEEL
Type of Strand = Low-Relaxation
Type of Reinforcement = Bonded
Nominal area of strands, Aps = 98.70 mm2
Corrugated galvanised steel ducts outside diameter, Dd = 87.00 mm
Ultimate tensile stength of prestressing steel,fpu (DGCS Table 12.1.3-1) = 1860.00 Mpa
Yield strength, fpy (90% fpu for Low Relaxation Strand) = 1674.00 Mpa
Modulus of Prestressing Steel, Ep (DGCS 12.1.3.1) = 197000.00 Mpa
No. of stressing ends = 2 Ends

B. GEOMETRY AND SECTION PROPERTIES

Girder Length,LG

300mm Bearing-to-bearing distance, L 300mm

Girder Location ( E-exterior / I- interior ) = E Number of int. diaphragms = 3 pcs


Girder Length, LG = 35000 mm Width of int. diaphragm = 250 mm
Bearing-to-bearing distance, L = 34400 mm Depth of int. diaphragm = 1410 mm
Number of girders = 4 pcs Length of int. diapragm = 948.5 mm
Width of slab: Width of haunch = 1117 mm
Center-to-center spacing of girders = 2100 mm Thickness of haunch = 50 mm
Cantilever length of deck slab = 1620 mm Width of wearing surface = 2100 mm
Thickness of deck slab = 220 mm Thickness of wearing surface = 50 mm

Standard Section Types:

[ 1 ] TYPE VI-M [ 5 ] TYPE IV-A Modular ratio, n = Ecs/Ec = 0.82639


Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

[ 2 ] TYPE II [ 6 ] TYPE IV-B


[ 3 ] TYPE III [ 7 ] TYPE V
[ 4 ] TYPE IV [ 8 ] TYPE VI

Selected Girder Type = [ 7 ] TYPE V

SECTION @ END SECTION @ MIDSPAN

AASHTO GIRDER
TYPE V

Properties Basic Composite Basic Composite


Effective slab width, b (m) - 2.670 - 2.670
Area, A (m²) 1.190 1.722 0.6532 1.185
Moment of inertia, I (m4) 0.269 0.581 0.217 0.477
Distance of N.A. from top, Yt (m) 0.768 0.755 0.788 0.638
Distance of N.A. from bottom, Yb (m) 0.832 1.115 0.812 1.232
Section modulus at top, St (m³) 0.351 0.769 0.275 0.748
Section modulus at bottom, Sb (m³) 0.324 0.521 0.267 0.387
Total height of section, h (m) 1.600 1.870 1.600 1.870
Top flange width, tf (m) 1.067 1.067 1.067 1.067

C. LOADING PER GIRDER

1. Uniform load due to Girder, wGirder = 15.39 kN/m


Cross-sectional area of Girder, AGirder = 0.653 m2
2. Uniform load due to Slab,wSlab = 13.84 kN/m
Slab width, bSlab = 2.67 m
Slab thickness, tSlab = 0.22 m
3. Uniform load due to Haunch = 1.32 kN/m
Haunch width, bHaunch = 1.117 m
Haunch thickness, tHaunch = 0.05 m
4. Uniform load due to Intermediate Diaphragm, wDiap = 0.68 kN/m
Number of Intermediate Diaphragms, NDiap = 3 pcs
Intermediate Diaphragm width, bDiap = 0.25 m
Intermediate Diaphragm depth, dDiap = 1.41 m
Intermediate Diaphragm length, lDiap = 0.95 m
5. Uniform load due to Wearing Surface, wws = 2.31 kN/m
Wearing surface width, bws = 2.1 m
Wearing surface thickness, tws = 0.05 m
6. Uniform load due to Sidewalk, wSidewalk = 5.31 kN/m
7. Uniform load due to Railing and Railpost, wRailing = 7.07 kN/m
8. Uniform load due to Utilities, wUtil = 2.30 kN/m

Uniform load due to Girder weight only, wGirder = 15.39 kN/m


Uniform load during Slab Pouring (except Girder weight), w Pour = wSlab + wHaunch + wDiap = 15.83 kN/m
Uniform load due to attachments, wDC-2 = wWS + wSidewalk + wRailing = 6.19 kN/m
Uniform load due to wearing surface and utilities, wDW = wWS + wUtilities = 4.61 kN/m

D. LOAD MODIFIERS : DGCS 10.3

A. DUCTILITY
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

For strength limit state


Factor relating to ductility, hD = 1.00

*for conventional design and details complying with the AASHTO Specification
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

For all other limit state


Factor relating to ductility, hD = 1.00

B. REDUNDANCY

For strength limit state


Factor relating to redundancy, hR = 1.00
*for conventional levels of redundancy, foundation elements where phi already accounts for redundance (as specified
in art. 15.2)

For all other limit state


Factor relating to ductility, hR = 1.00

C. OPERATIONAL IMPORTANCE

For strength limit state


Factor relating to operational importance, hI = 1.05

*for critical or essential bridges

For all other limit state


Factor relating to ductility, hI = 1.00

Load modifier, h i:
a. for strength limit state (maximum values) = 1.05

b. for strength limit (minimum values) = 0.95

c. for all other limit state = 1.00

E. DESIGN FORCES

1. Due to Girder Weight Only ( Simple Beam)


Uniform load due to Girder weight only = 15.39 kN/m

0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 14.00


From end 17.50 m
35.00 31.50 28.00 24.50 21.00
MG 0.00 767.49 1427.27 1898.54 2181.30 2275.55 kN-m
VG 269.30 210.82 156.96 103.10 49.24 0 kN-m

2. Due to Slab , Haunch and Diapragm (Simple Beam)


Uniform load due to Slab, Haunch and Diapragm = 15.83 kN/m
��=��×��×�𝐼 ≥0.95
0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 14.00
From end 17.50 m
35.00 31.50 28.00 24.50 21.00
MS 0.00 789.53 1468.25 1953.05 2243.92 2340.88 kN-m
�V�S= 1/(��×��×�𝐼)≤1.00
277.03 221.62 166.22 110.81 55.41 0 kN-m

3. Due to Attachments (Simple Beam)


Uniform load due to Superimposed dead load = 6.19 kN/m

0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 14.00


From end 17.50 m
35.00 31.50 28.00 24.50 21.00
MSDL 0.00 308.75 574.16 763.74 877.49 915.40 kN-m
VSDL 108.33 86.67 65.00 43.33 21.67 0 kN-m
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

4. Due to Wearing Surface and Utilities


Uniform load due to Superimposed dead load = 4.61 kN/m

0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 14.00


From end 17.50 m
35.00 31.50 28.00 24.50 21.00
MSDL 0.00 229.70 427.16 568.20 652.82 681.03 kN-m
VSDL 80.60 64.48 48.36 32.24 16.12 0 kN-m

5. Due to Live Load ( Simple Beam)

Dynamic Load Allowance (IM) = (1+ IM/100) = 1.33

5.1 Live Load Distribution Factors

No. of Lanes = 2 lanes


Multiple presence factor for single lane loaded, IM = 1

DPWH DGCS Table 10.7.2.2-1: Multiple Presence Factors "m"

Number of Loaded Lanes Multiple Presence Factors

1 1.2
2 1
3 0.85
>3 0.65

Check applicability of Distribution Factors:


Girder spacing, S = 2.10 m OK!
Slab thickness, ts = 0.22 m OK!
Girder Length = 35.00 m OK!
Number of girders, Nb = 4 OK!
Kg = 9.73E+11 mm4 OK!

5.1. MOMENT DISTRIBUTION FACTORS FOR INTERIOR GIRDERS


a. Skew Correction Factor for Bending Moments
DF = 1-C1(tanФ)1.5
Skew in Degrees = 0

n = Ece/Ecs = 1.21
eg = 0.95 m
Kg= n(Ic+Aceg2) (DPWH DGCS 11.3.2.2-1) = 9.73E+11 mm4
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

Note:
if Ф<30, c1= 0
if Ф>60, Ф= 60
c1 = 0.00
Skew Correction Factor = 1.00

b. Distribution factor of live load for moment (two or more design lanes loaded in interior beams)
DFM = 0.075+ (S/2900)0.6 * (S/L)0.2 * (Kg/ts3L)0.1 = 0.59 lanes/beam
c. Distribution factor for moment (one design lane loaded in interior beams)
DFM = 0.06+ (S/4300)0.4 * (S/L)0.3 * (Kg/ts3L)0.1
DFM = 0.47 lanes/beam

5.2 SHEAR DISTRIBUTION FACTORS FOR INTERIOR GIRDERS

a. Skew Correction Factor for Shears (AASHTO LRFD 4.6.2.2.3c)


SC = 1.0+0.20(Lts/Kg) tanФ
0.3

SC = 1.00
Distribution factor of live load for shear (two or more design lanes loaded in interior beams)
DFV = 0.2+(S/3600)-(S/10700)^2
DFV = 0.74 lanes/beam
Distribution factor for shear (one design lane loaded in interior beams)
DFV = 0.36+(S/7600)
DFV = 0.64 lanes/beam

5.3. MOMENT DISTRIBUTION FACTORS FOR EXTERIOR GIRDERS

de,hor. Distance from ext.web to edge of curb = 0.41 m


a. Distribution factor of live load for moment (two or more design lanes loaded in exterior beams)
e = 0.77+(de/2800)
e = 0.92 mm
DFM = eginterior
DFM = 0.54

Distribution factor for moment (one design lane loaded in exterior beams)

use LEVER RULE, assume truck is 610mm away from curb:


DFMS = 0.65 lanes/beam

5.4. SHEAR DISTRIBUTION FACTORS FOR EXTERIOR GIRDERS


Distribution factor of live load for shear (two or more design lanes loaded in exterior beams)
eg = 0.6+(de/3000)
eg = 0.74 mm
DFV = eginterior
DFV = 0.55 lanes/beam
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

Distribution factor for shear (one design lane loaded in exterior beams, Strength and Service Limit State)
DFM = 0.65
DFV = 0.65 lanes/beam

Table: Summary of Service and Strength Limit State Distribution Factors

Moment Exterior Shear Exterior


Load Case Beams Beams

Multiple Lanes
Loaded 0.54 0.55
Distribution
factors
Single Lane 0.65 0.65
Loaded

Note: Additional check for rigidly-connected girders no longer performed.

Unfactored shear forces and bending moments:


1. Strength and Service States
1.1. Truck Loads
Truck load shear force
VLT = (shear force/lane)(DFV)(1+IM)
VLT = 0.86
Truck load bending moment
MLT = (moment/lane)(DFV)(1+IM)
MLT = 0.86

1.2. Lane Loads


Lane load shear force
VLL = (shear force/lane)(DFV)
VLL = 0.65
Lane load bending moment
MLL = (shear force/lane)(DFV)
MLL = 0.65

5.3 Live Loads


5.3.1 HL-93
Moment CL Shear

36kN 144kN 144kN 144kN 144kN 36kN

12.22m 4.27m 4.27m 13.64m 4.27m 4.27m 25.86m


34.40m 34.40m

R= 168.72 kN R = 335.49 kN x 0.862


RLL+I = 289.07 kN
MCL = 168.72 x 17.2 - 144 x 4.27
MCL = 2287.08 kNm
MLL+I = 2287.08 x 0.86
MLL+I = 1970.66 kNm
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

5.3.2 Lane Load


Moment Shear

9.34 kN/m 9.34 kN/m

R
34.40m 34.40m

R= 160.65 kN R= 160.65 kN x 0.648

Width of one lane = 3.66 m RLL+I = 104.08 kN


Number of lanes = 2
MCL = wL2 (DF)
8
MCL = 895.06 kNm

5.3.3 Tandem Load


Moment CL Shear

110kN 110kN 110kN 110kN

16.60m 1.2m 16.60m 1.20m 33.20m


34.40m 34.40m

R= 110.00 kN R = 242.70 kN x 0.862

MCL = 110.00 x 17.2 - 110 x 0.6 RLL+I = 209.13 kN


MCL = 1826.00 kNm
MLL+I = 1826.00 x 0.86
MLL+I = 1573.37 kNm

5.3.4 Pedestrian Load

Check if pedestrian load shall be considered:


Sidewalk width = 1.10 m
Width requirement from DGCS to consider pedestrian load = 0.60 m
Therefore, consider pedestrian load.
Pedestrian Load = 3.60 kPa

3.60 kN/m

34.40m

R= 61.92 kN

0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 14.00


From end 17.50 m
35.00 31.50 28.00 24.50 21.00
MLL1 0.00 194.67 345.24 451.71 514.08 532.35 kN-m
VLL1 61.92 49.32 36.72 24.12 11.52 -1.08 kN-m
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

6. Load Combinations (DGCS Table 10.3-1)

a. Strength I: 1.25DC+1.50DW+1.75(LL+I)

0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 14.00


From end 17.50 m
35.00 31.50 28.00 24.50 21.00
MLL1 0.00 4570.66 8548.39 11651.44 13473.98 14180.31 kN-m
VLL1 1822.36 1329.01 841.71 543.17 283.87 30.63 kN-m

b. Service I: DC+DW+(LL+I)

0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 14.00


From end 17.50 m
35.00 31.50 28.00 24.50 21.00
MLL1 0.00 3126.16 5840.00 7920.93 9148.11 9610.95 kN-m
VLL1 1190.32 880.80 575.89 373.71 192.88 16.67 kN-m

b. Service IIII: DC+DW+0.8(LL+I)

0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 14.00


From end 17.50 m
35.00 31.50 28.00 24.50 21.00
MLL1 0.00 2920.02 5451.36 7373.45 8509.59 8931.33 kN-m
VLL1 1099.31 821.35 548.02 356.86 182.79 13.33 kN-m
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

35.00 M SPAN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE AASHTO GIRDER


E. ALLOWABLE STRESSES

a. At transfer
Compression (DGCS 12.6.4.1) = 0.60f'ci = 21.00 MPa
Tension, fti (DGCS Table 12.6.3.1-1)
-unbonded reinforcement, areas other than = 0.25sqrt(f'ci) <=1.38 = 1.38 MPa
the precompressed tensile zone
-bonded reinforcement sufficient to resist = 0.63sqrt(f'ci) = 3.73 MPa
the tensile force in the concrete computed
an uncracked secton, where reinforcement is
proportioned using a stress of 0.5fy, not to
exceed 210 MPa

b. At Service
Compression,fc (DGCS Table 12.6.4.2-1)
*Fpe+DC+DW, other than segmentally = 0.45f'c = 18.45 MPa
constructed bridges
*Fpe+DC+DW, segmentally constructed = 0.45f'c = 18.45 MPa
bridges
*Fpe+DC+DW+LL = 0.60f'c = 24.60 MPa

Tension, ft
*Bonded Reinforcement, Case of = 0.25sqrt(f'c) = 1.60 MPa
severe corrosion
*Bonded Reinforcement, Case of = 0.50sqrt(f'c) = 3.20 MPa
moderate corrosion
non-bonded reinforcement = no tension = 0.00 MPa

c. Prestressing Steel
Immediately prior to transfer = 0.90fpy = 1506.60 MPa
Immediately after anchor set
a. at anchorage = 0.70fpu = 1302.00 MPa
b. elsewhere along length of member
= 0.74fpu = 1376.40
away from anchorages and couplers MPa
c. At Service Limit after lossses = 0.80fpy = 1339.20 MPa

For Service III load combination, bottom fiber stress fb is

�_𝑏= (𝑀_�+𝑀_𝑆)/𝑆_𝑏 +(𝑀_𝐴+𝑀_𝑊𝑆+0.8(𝑀_𝐿𝑇+𝑀_𝐿𝐿))/𝑆_𝑏𝑐

Midspan stresses at bottom fibers at Service III load combination, fbc: = 28.43 MPa
Maximum alowable tensile stress, ft = 1.60 MPa
Required compressive stress at the bottom, fc = 26.83 MPa
Assumed trial eccentricity, etrial = 711.75 mm
Prestressing force, Pe = 6393.94 kN
Assumed Percentage of Prestress Losses = 20 %
Initial Prestressing force, Pi = 7992.42 kN
Computed quantity of 12.7mm diameter prestressing strands (trial) = 58 pcs
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

ACTUAL ECCENTRICITY "e"

Number of Cable Location from


Cable Designation Bot. of Girder @ N x Ee N x Ce Y K
Strands (N)
End (Ee) Center (Ec)
C1 12 1.300 0.100 15.60 1.20 1.20 255.21
C2 12 1.050 0.100 12.60 1.20 0.95 322.37
C3 12 0.800 0.100 9.60 1.20 0.70 437.50
C4 11 0.550 0.100 6.05 1.10 0.45 680.56
C5 11 0.300 0.100 3.30 1.10 0.20 1531.25

Total 58 47.15 5.80

Center of Gravity of Cables at End from Bottom of Girder = 47.15 ¸ 58 = 0.812931 m


Center of Gravity of Cables at Center from Bottom of Girder = 5.80 ¸ 58 = 0.1 m
X2 = KY where: X = half of girder length = 17.200 m
Y = 0.813 - 0.100 = 0.713 m
\ Constant K = 17.200² ¸ 0.713
= 414.963

0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 14.00


Distance From Left End 17.50 m
35.00 31.50 28.00 24.50 21.00
Basic Section
Distance of N.A. to bottom 0.832 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.812 0.812
"e" From Bottom of Girder 0.838 0.572 0.366 0.218 0.130 0.100 m
Actual "e" for Basic -0.006 0.239 0.446 0.594 0.682 0.712
Composite Section
Distance of N.A. to bottom 1.115 1.232 1.232 1.232 1.232 1.232
"e" From Bottom of Girder 0.838 0.572 0.366 0.218 0.130 0.100 m
Actual "e" for Composite 0.277 0.660 0.866 1.014 1.102 1.132
Note :
1) Negative (-) sign denotes tendon is above the neutral axis of the section considered.
2) Positive (+) sign denotes tendon is below the neutral axis of the section considered.

F. COMPUTATION OF LOSSES - POST TENSIONED MEMBERS (DGCS 12.6.5)

〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝑇= 〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝐹+ 〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝐴+ 〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝐸𝑆+ 〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝐿𝑇

where:
DfpFR = loss due to friction
DfpSH = loss due to anchorage set
DfpES = loss due to elastic shortening
DfpCRc = loss due to long term shrinkage and creep

1. Losses Due to Friction

〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝐹= �_𝑝𝑗 (1−𝑒^(−(𝐾𝑥+𝜇𝛼) ))


Where:
fpj = stress in the prestressing steel at jacking (MPa)
x = length of a prestressing tendon from the jacking end to any point under consideration (mm)
K = wobble friction coeffiecient (per mm of tendon)
μ = coefficient of friction
⍺ = sum of the absolute values of angular change of prestressing steel path from jacking end if tensioning
is done at both ends, to the point under investigation (rad)
e = base of Napierian logarithms
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

Wobble Coefficient, K = 6.56E-07 /mm


Coefficient of friction, μ = 0.25 /rad
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

DCGS Table 12.6.5.2-1: Friction Coefficients for Post-Tensioning Tendons

Type of Steel Type of duct K m

Rigid or semi-rigid galvanized metal sheeting 6.56E-07 0.15-0.25


Wire or strand Polyethylene 6.56E-07 0.23
Rigid steel pipe deviators for external tendons 6.56E-07 0.25
High-strength bars Galvanized metal sheeting 6.56E-07 0.3

2. Loss Due to Anchorage Set

Set = 6 /mm

3. Loss Due to Elastic Shortening

〖 Δ� 〗 _𝑝𝐸𝑆=(𝑁−1)/2𝑁 𝐸_𝑝/𝐸_𝑐� �_𝑐𝑔𝑝

Where
N = Number of identical prestressing tendons
fcgp = sum of concrete streses at the center of gravity of prestressing tendons
due to the prestressing force after jacking and the self-weight of the member
at the sections of maximum moment (MPa)

Modulus of Elasticity of Strands, Ep = 197000 MPa


Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete at transfer, Eci = 29941 MPa
Number of identical strands, N = 58

4. Time-Dependent Losses (DGCS 12.6.5.4)

〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝐿𝑇= 〖 ( 〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝑆�+ 〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝐶�+ 〖∆�〗 _𝑝�1) 〗 _�𝑑+ 〖 ( 〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝑆�+ 〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝐶�+ 〖∆�〗 _𝑝�2− 〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝑆𝑆) 〗 _𝑑�
where:
ΔfpSR = prestress loss due to shrinkage of girder concrete between transfer and deck placement
ΔfpCR = prestress loss due to creep of girder concrete between transfer and deck placement
ΔfpR1 = prestress loss due to relaxation of prestressing strands between time of transfer and deck placement
ΔfpR2 = prestress loss due to relaxation of prestressing strands in composite section between time of deck placement and final
ΔfpSD = prestress loss due to shrinkage of girder concrete between time of deck placement and finaltime
ΔfpCD = prestress loss due to creep of girder concrete between time of deck placement and final time
ΔfpSS = prestress gain due to shrinkage of deck in composite action

Post-Tensioned Non-Segmental Girders

Long-term prestress losses for post-tensioned members after tendons have been grouted may be
calculated under the provisions of Articles 12.6.5.4 through 12.6.5.6. In equation 12.6.5.4-1, the value of the term
(DfpSR+DfpCR+DfpR1)id shall be taken as zero.
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

4.2 Losses: Time of Deck Placement to Final time


ti = 3 days
Age at transfer, ti td = 30 days
Age at deck placement, td tf = 10,000 days
Final age, tf

Loss due to shrinkage, D¦pSD = εbdf Kdf Ep


Concrete shrinkage strain of girder, εbdf = ks khs kf ktd (0.48E-03) εbdf = 0.00051
Concrete shrinkage strain of girder, εddf = ks khs kf ktd (0.48E-03) εddf = 0.00051
Volume to surface ratio, (V/S) V/S = 0.11
Factor for vol. to surface ratio of component, ks = 1.45-0.0051(V/S)>=1.0 ks = 1.45
Mean annual ambient relative humidity,H H = 80 %
Humidity Factor for creep,Khc = 1.56-0.008H khc = 0.92
Humidity factor for shrinkage, khs = 2.0-0.014H khs = 0.88
Factor for effect of concrete strength, kf = 35/7 + fci' kf = 0.833
Time development factor, kt = (tf/(61+0.58fci'+tf)) kt = 0.992
Time development factor, ktd = (td/(61+0.58fci'+td)) ktd = 0.270
yb(tf,ti) = 1.9kskhckfktti-0.118 yb(tf,ti) = 1.8397
yb(td,ti) = 1.9kskhckfktdti-0.118 yb(td,ti) = 0.4999
yb(tf,td) = 1.9kskhckfkttd-0.118 yb(tf,td) = 1.4020

4.2.1 Shrinkage of Girder Concrete, D¦ pSR

〖∆�〗 _𝑝𝑆�=𝜀_𝑏𝑑� 𝐸_𝑝 𝐾_�𝑑


in which:

𝐾_�𝑑= 1/(1+𝐸_𝑝/𝐸_𝑐� 𝐴_𝑝𝑠/𝐴_𝑔 (1+(𝐴_𝑔 〖


〖�^2 〗 _𝑝𝑔)/𝐼_𝑔 )[1+0.7𝜓_𝑏 (𝑡_�,𝑡_�)] )

where:
ebdf = shrinkage strain of girder between time of deck placement and final time
Kdf = transformed section coefficient that accounts for time-dependent interaction between concrete and bonded steel
in the section being considered for time period between deck placement and final time
epc = eccentricity of prestressing force with respect to centroid of composite section,
positive in typical construction where prestressing force is below centroid of section
Ac = area of section calculated using the gross composite concrete section properties of the girder
and the deck and the deck-to-girder modular ratio
Ic = moment of inertia of section calculated using the gross composite concrete section properties of the girder
and the deck and the deck-to-girder modular ratio at service

4.2.2 Loss due to Creep of Concrete, D¦ pCD

〖 Δ� 〗 _𝑝𝐶�= 𝐸_𝑝/𝐸_𝑐� �_𝑐𝑔𝑝 [𝜓_𝑏 (𝑡_�,𝑡_� )−𝜓_𝑏 (𝑡_𝑑,𝑡_�)] 𝐾_𝑑�+𝐸_𝑝/𝐸_𝑐 〖 Δ� 〗 _𝑐𝑑 𝜓_𝑏 (𝑡_�,𝑡_𝑑)𝐾_𝑑�

where:
Dfcd = change I concrete stress at centroid of prestressing strands due to long-term losses between transfer and deck
placement, combined with deck weight and superimposed loads
yb(tf,td) = girder creep coefficient at final time due to loading at deck placement

EP/Eci = 6.58
EP/Ec = 6.08
yb(tf,ti) = 1.84
yb(td,ti) = 0.50
yb(tf,td) = 1.40
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

4.2.3 Relaxation of Prestressing Strands, D¦ pR2 = D¦ pR1

〖∆�〗 _𝑝�1=�_𝑝𝑡/𝐾_𝐿 (�_𝑝𝑡/�_𝑝𝑦 −0.55)

where:
fpt = stress in prestressing strands immediately after transfer, taken not less than 0.55fpy
KL = 30 for low-relaxation strands and 7 for other prestressing steel, unless more accurate
manufacturer's data are available

KL = 30

4.2.4 Shrinkage of Deck Concrete, D¦ pSS

〖 Δ� 〗 _𝑝𝑆𝑆=𝐸_𝑝/𝐸_𝑐 〖 Δ� 〗 _𝑐𝑑� 𝐾_𝑑� [1+0.7𝜓_𝑏 (𝑡_�,𝑡_𝑑)]

in which:

〖 Δ� 〗 _𝑐𝑑�=(𝜀_𝑑𝑑� 𝐴_𝑑 𝐸_𝑐𝑑)/[1+0.7𝜓_𝑏 (𝑡_�,𝑡_𝑑 )] (1/𝐴_𝑐 −(𝑒_𝑝𝑐 𝑒_𝑑)/𝐼_𝑐 )

where:
Dfcdf = change in concrete stress at centroid of prestressing strands due to shrinkage of deck concrete
eddf = shrinkage strain of deck concrete between placement and final time
Ad = area of deck concrete
Ecd = modulus of elasticity of deck concrete
ed = eccentricity of deck with respect to the gross composite section, positive in typical concrete
construction where deck is above girder
yb(tf,td) = creep coefficient of deck concrete at final time due to loading introduced shortly after deck placement
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

DETERMINATION OF PRESTRESS LOSSES: FRICTION AND ANCHORAGE SET: Cable 1

Cable Designation: = C1
Yend = 1.30 m
Ymid = 0.10 m
N = 12 strands
Area of prestressing strands, Aps = 1184.40 mm2
Constant K for Cable C1: = 255.21
Jacking Pressure = 1395.00 MPa
jacking Force = 1652.24 kN

A. Friction Losses
Wobble Friction Coefficient, K = 0.000656 /m
Coefficient of friction, μ: = 0.25 /rad
Modulus of Elasticity of Prestressing Strands, Eps = 197000 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete at Transfer, Eci = 29940.70 MPa

B. Anchorage Set
Assumed influence distance = 18.21 m
Allowable anchorage slip, Δs = 6.00 mm
Angular change at assumed Lset, α = 0.1427
Jacking Force at anchorage, Po = 1652.24 kN
Jacking Force at assumed influence distance, Pa = 1575.40 kN
Loss of prestress per unit length, p = 4.22 kN/m
Setting length, Lset = 18.21 m OK!
Loss due to Anchorage Set, ΔP = 153.72 kN

Stage 1a: Friction Loss Stage 1b:Anchorage Set


x y fr. Bot θ δα Σα δL ΣL FnetPF (kN) ΔfpF (kN) FnetPA (kN) Loss (kN)
0 1.300 -0.137 0 0.00 0.00 0 1652.238 0.00 1498.52 153.72
3.5 0.868 -0.110 0.0274 0.03 3.53 3.53 1637.16 15.08 1512.98 124.17
7 0.532 -0.082 0.0274 0.05 3.52 7.04 1622.2214 30.02 1527.59 94.63
10.5 0.292 -0.055 0.0274 0.08 3.51 10.55 1607.4321 44.81 1542.35 65.08
14 0.148 -0.027 0.0274 0.11 3.50 14.05 1592.7831 59.45 1557.24 35.54
17.5 0.100 0.000 0.0274 0.14 3.50 17.55 1578.2703 73.97 1572.28 5.99
21 0.148 0.027 0.0274 0.16 3.50 21.05 1592.7831 59.45 1557.24 35.54
24.5 0.292 0.055 0.0274 0.19 3.50 24.56 1607.4321 44.81 1542.35 65.08
28 0.532 0.082 0.0274 0.22 3.51 28.07 1622.2214 30.02 1527.59 94.63
31.5 0.868 0.110 0.0274 0.25 3.52 31.58 1637.1553 15.08 1512.98 124.17
35 1.300 0.137 0.0274 0.27 3.53 35.11 1652.238 0.00 1498.52 153.72

Chart Title
1700

1650

1600

1550

1500

1450 Stage 1a : After Fri ction Loss Stage 1b: After Anchora ge Set

1400
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
1550 Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional

1500
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPEStage
V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
1450 COMPARISON1a :VS
After Fri ction LossFilename
MIDAS Stage 1b: After Anchora ge Set
:

1400
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

DETERMINATION OF PRESTRESS LOSSES: FRICTION AND ANCHORAGE SET: Cable 2

Cable Designation: = C2
Yend = 1.05 m
Ymid = 0.10 m
N = 12 strands
Area of prestressing strands, Aps = 1184.40 mm2
Constant K for Cable C2: = 322.37
Jacking Pressure = 1395.00 MPa
jacking Force = 1652.24 kN

A. Friction Losses
Wobble Friction Coefficient, K = 0.000656 /m
Coefficient of friction, μ: = 0.25 /rad
Modulus of Elasticity of Prestressing Strands, Eps = 197000 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete at Transfer, Eci = 29940.70 MPa

B. Anchorage Set
Assumed influence distance = 19.81 m
Allowable anchorage slip, Δs = 6.00 mm
Angular change at assumed Lset, α = 0.1229
Jacking Force at anchorage, Po = 1652.24 kN
Jacking Force at assumed influence distance, Pa = 1581.56 kN
Loss of prestress per unit length, p = 3.57 kN/m
Setting length, Lset = 19.81 m OK!
Loss due to Anchorage Set, ΔP = 141.35 kN

Stage 1a: Friction Loss Stage 1b:Anchorage Set


x y fr. Bot θ δα Σα δL ΣL FnetPF (kN) ΔfpF (kN) FnetPA (kN) Loss (kN)
0 1.300 -0.109 0 0.00 0.00 0 1652.238 0.00 1510.89 141.35
3.5 0.868 -0.087 0.0217 0.02 3.53 3.53 1639.50 12.74 1523.12 116.38
7 0.532 -0.065 0.0217 0.04 3.52 7.04 1626.863 25.38 1535.46 91.40
10.5 0.292 -0.043 0.0217 0.07 3.51 10.55 1614.3359 37.90 1547.91 66.43
14 0.148 -0.022 0.0217 0.09 3.50 14.05 1601.9107 50.33 1560.45 41.46
17.5 0.100 0.000 0.0217 0.11 3.50 17.55 1589.584 62.65 1573.10 16.48
21 0.148 0.022 0.0217 0.13 3.50 21.05 1601.9107 50.33 1560.45 41.46
24.5 0.292 0.043 0.0217 0.15 3.50 24.56 1614.3359 37.90 1547.91 66.43
28 0.532 0.065 0.0217 0.17 3.51 28.07 1626.863 25.38 1535.46 91.40
31.5 0.868 0.087 0.0217 0.20 3.52 31.58 1639.4958 12.74 1523.12 116.38
35 1.300 0.109 0.0217 0.22 3.53 35.11 1652.238 0.00 1510.89 141.35

Chart Title
1700

1650

1600

1550

1500

1450 Stage 1a : After Fri ction Loss Stage 1b: After Anchora ge Set

1400
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
1550 Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional

1500
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPEStage
V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
1450 COMPARISON1a :VS
After Fri ction LossFilename
MIDAS Stage 1b: After Anchora ge Set
:

1400
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

DETERMINATION OF PRESTRESS LOSSES: FRICTION AND ANCHORAGE SET: Cable 3

Cable Designation: = C3
Yend = 0.80 m
Ymid = 0.10 m
N = 12 strands
Area of prestressing strands, Aps = 1184.40 mm2
Constant K for Cable C3: = 437.50
Jacking Pressure = 1395.00 MPa
jacking Force = 1652.24 kN

A. Friction Losses
Wobble Friction Coefficient, K = 0.000656 /m
Coefficient of friction, μ: = 0.25 /rad
Modulus of Elasticity of Prestressing Strands, Eps = 197000 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete at Transfer, Eci = 29940.70 MPa

B. Anchorage Set
Assumed influence distance = 21.92 m
Allowable anchorage slip, Δs = 6.00 mm
Angular change at assumed Lset, α = 0.1002
Jacking Force at anchorage, Po = 1652.24 kN
Jacking Force at assumed influence distance, Pa = 1588.36 kN
Loss of prestress per unit length, p = 2.91 kN/m
Setting length, Lset = 21.92 m OK!
Loss due to Anchorage Set, ΔP = 127.75 kN

Stage 1a: Friction Loss Stage 1b:Anchorage Set


x y fr. Bot θ δα Σα δL ΣL FnetPF (kN) ΔfpF (kN) FnetPA (kN) Loss (kN)
0 1.300 -0.080 0 0.00 0.00 0 1652.238 0.00 1524.49 127.75
3.5 0.868 -0.064 0.0160 0.02 3.53 3.53 1641.84 10.40 1534.49 107.35
7 0.532 -0.048 0.0160 0.03 3.52 7.04 1631.5178 20.72 1544.56 86.95
10.5 0.292 -0.032 0.0160 0.05 3.51 10.55 1621.2693 30.97 1554.71 66.56
14 0.148 -0.016 0.0160 0.06 3.50 14.05 1611.0907 41.15 1564.93 46.16
17.5 0.100 0.000 0.0160 0.08 3.50 17.55 1600.9788 51.26 1575.22 25.76
21 0.148 0.016 0.0160 0.10 3.50 21.05 1611.0907 41.15 1564.93 46.16
24.5 0.292 0.032 0.0160 0.11 3.50 24.56 1621.2693 30.97 1554.71 66.56
28 0.532 0.048 0.0160 0.13 3.51 28.07 1631.5178 20.72 1544.56 86.95
31.5 0.868 0.064 0.0160 0.14 3.52 31.58 1641.8396 10.40 1534.49 107.35
35 1.300 0.080 0.0160 0.16 3.53 35.11 1652.238 0.00 1524.49 127.75

Chart Title
1700

1650

1600

1550

1500
Stage 1a : After Fri ction Loss Stage 1b: After Anchora ge Set

1450
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
1600
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
1550 DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPEStage
1500 V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON1a :VS
After Fri ction LossFilename
MIDAS Stage 1b:
:
After Anchora ge Set

1450
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

DETERMINATION OF PRESTRESS LOSSES: FRICTION AND ANCHORAGE SET: Cable 4

Cable Designation: = C4
Yend = 0.55 m
Ymid = 0.10 m
N = 11 strands
Area of prestressing strands, Aps = 1085.70 mm2
Constant K for Cable C4: = 680.56
Jacking Pressure = 1395.00 MPa
jacking Force = 1514.55 kN

A. Friction Losses
Wobble Friction Coefficient, K = 0.000656 /m
Coefficient of friction, μ: = 0.25 /rad
Modulus of Elasticity of Prestressing Strands, Eps = 197000 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete at Transfer, Eci = 29940.70 MPa

B. Anchorage Set
Assumed influence distance = 24.90 m
Allowable anchorage slip, Δs = 6.00 mm
Angular change at assumed Lset, α = 0.0732
Jacking Force at anchorage, Po = 1514.55 kN
Jacking Force at assumed influence distance, Pa = 1463.00 kN
Loss of prestress per unit length, p = 2.07 kN/m
Setting length, Lset = 24.90 m OK!
Loss due to Anchorage Set, ΔP = 103.09 kN

Stage 1a: Friction Loss Stage 1b:Anchorage Set


x y fr. Bot θ δα Σα δL ΣL FnetPF (kN) ΔfpF (kN) FnetPA (kN) Loss (kN)
0 1.300 -0.051 0 0.00 0.00 0 1514.5515 0.00 1411.46 103.09
3.5 0.868 -0.041 0.0103 0.01 3.53 3.53 1507.17 7.38 1418.57 88.60
7 0.532 -0.031 0.0103 0.02 3.52 7.04 1499.8371 14.71 1425.73 74.11
10.5 0.292 -0.021 0.0103 0.03 3.51 10.55 1492.5465 22.01 1432.93 59.62
14 0.148 -0.010 0.0103 0.04 3.50 14.05 1485.2964 29.26 1440.17 45.13
17.5 0.100 0.000 0.0103 0.05 3.50 17.55 1478.084 36.47 1447.45 30.64
21 0.148 0.010 0.0103 0.06 3.50 21.05 1485.2964 29.26 1440.17 45.13
24.5 0.292 0.021 0.0103 0.07 3.50 24.56 1492.5465 22.01 1432.93 59.62
28 0.532 0.031 0.0103 0.08 3.51 28.07 1499.8371 14.71 1425.73 74.11
31.5 0.868 0.041 0.0103 0.09 3.52 31.58 1507.1712 7.38 1418.57 88.60
35 1.300 0.051 0.0103 0.10 3.53 35.11 1514.5515 0.00 1411.46 103.09

Chart Title
1540
1520
1500
1480
1460
1440
1420
1400
1380
Stage 1a : After Fri ction Loss Stage 1b: After Anchora ge Set
1360
1340
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
1460
1440 Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
1420 DESIGN SHEET Development
1400 Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPEStage
1380 V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON1a :VS
After Fri ction LossFilename
MIDAS Stage 1b:
:
After Anchora ge Set
1360
1340
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

DETERMINATION OF PRESTRESS LOSSES: FRICTION AND ANCHORAGE SET: Cable 5

Cable Designation: = C5
Yend = 0.30 m
Ymid = 0.10 m
N = 11 strands
Area of prestressing strands, Aps = 1085.70 mm2
Constant K for Cable C5: = 1531.25
Jacking Pressure = 1395.00 MPa
jacking Force = 1514.55 kN

A. Friction Losses
Wobble Friction Coefficient, K = 0.000656 /m
Coefficient of friction, μ: = 0.25 /rad
Modulus of Elasticity of Prestressing Strands, Eps = 197000 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete at Transfer, Eci = 29940.70 MPa

B. Anchorage Set
Assumed influence distance = 29.58 m
Allowable anchorage slip, Δs = 6.00 mm
Angular change at assumed Lset, α = 0.0386
Jacking Force at anchorage, Po = 1514.55 kN
Jacking Force at assumed influence distance, Pa = 1471.17 kN
Loss of prestress per unit length, p = 1.47 kN/m
Setting length, Lset = 29.58 m OK!
Loss due to Anchorage Set, ΔP = 86.77 kN

Stage 1a: Friction Loss Stage 1b:Anchorage Set


x y fr. Bot θ δα Σα δL ΣL FnetPF (kN) ΔfpF (kN) FnetPA (kN) Loss (kN)
0 1.300 -0.023 0 0.00 0.00 0 1514.5515 0.00 1427.78 86.77
3.5 0.868 -0.018 0.0046 0.00 3.53 3.53 1509.33 5.23 1432.82 76.50
7 0.532 -0.014 0.0046 0.01 3.52 7.04 1504.1285 10.42 1437.89 66.23
10.5 0.292 -0.009 0.0046 0.01 3.51 10.55 1498.9568 15.59 1442.99 55.97
14 0.148 -0.005 0.0046 0.02 3.50 14.05 1493.8081 20.74 1448.11 45.70
17.5 0.100 0.000 0.0046 0.02 3.50 17.55 1488.6796 25.87 1453.24 35.43
21 0.148 0.005 0.0046 0.03 3.50 21.05 1493.8081 20.74 1448.11 45.70
24.5 0.292 0.009 0.0046 0.03 3.50 24.56 1498.9568 15.59 1442.99 55.97
28 0.532 0.014 0.0046 0.04 3.51 28.07 1504.1285 10.42 1437.89 66.23
31.5 0.868 0.018 0.0046 0.04 3.52 31.58 1509.3258 5.23 1432.82 76.50
35 1.300 0.023 0.0046 0.05 3.53 35.11 1514.5515 0.00 1427.78 86.77

Chart Title
1540
1520
1500
1480
1460
1440
1420
Stage 1a : After Fri ction Loss Stage 1b: After Anchora ge Set
1400
1380
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
1480
1460 Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
1440 DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : Date : 5/19/2019
1420 Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPEStage
V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON1a :VS
After Fri ction LossFilename
MIDAS Stage 1b:
:
After Anchora ge Set
1400
1380
0 3.5 7 10.5 14 17.5 21 24.5 28 31.5 35
Project Name :
DESIGN SHEET ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional Development

Designed :
Checked :
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR COMPARISON VS MIDAS
Filename :

PRESTRESS LOSSES USING REFINED METHOD

Jacking Pressure, fpj = 0.75 fpu


Jacking Pressure,fpj = 1395.00 MPa
Jacking Force = 7985.82 kN

(1) (2) (3) At Transfer (4) Total Loss At Ser


x eb ec δL ΣL ΔfpF (MPa) ΔfpA (MPa) ΔfpES fpj (MPa) Check fpj (kN) ΔfpSD (MPa) ΔfpCD (MPa) ΔfpR2 (MPa) ΔfpSS (MPa) ΔfpLT ΔfpT % Loss fpe (MPa)

0 -0.01 0.28 0 0 0.00 107.02 35.96 1252.01 OK 7167.28 91.75 90.24 8.26 62.17 68.92 211.90 15.19 1183.10
3.5 0.24 0.66 4 4 8.88 89.61 67.54 1228.97 OK 7035.34 86.59 171.92 7.54 40.86 133.73 299.77 21.49 1095.23

7 0.45 0.87 4 7 17.69 72.20 94.61 1210.50 OK 6929.66 82.51 247.62 6.99 29.78 201.87 386.36 27.70 1008.64
10.5 0.59 1.01 4 11 26.43 54.79 114.26 1199.52 OK 6866.77 79.22 302.96 6.66 22.31 252.70 448.18 32.13 946.82
14 0.68 1.10 4 14 35.10 37.38 126.41 1196.11 OK 6847.25 77.15 336.61 6.56 18.05 284.07 482.96 34.62 912.04

17.5 0.71 1.13 4 18 43.71 19.97 130.94 1200.38 OK 6871.70 76.44 348.72 6.69 16.67 295.64 490.26 35.14 904.74
21 0.68 1.10 4 21 35.10 37.38 126.41 1196.11 OK 6847.25 77.15 336.61 6.56 18.05 284.07 482.96 34.62 912.04
24.5 0.59 1.01 4 25 26.43 54.79 114.26 1199.52 OK 6866.77 79.22 302.96 6.66 22.31 252.70 448.18 32.13 946.82

28 0.45 0.87 4 28 17.69 72.20 94.61 1210.50 OK 6929.66 82.51 247.62 6.99 29.78 201.87 386.36 27.70 1008.64
31.5 0.24 0.66 4 32 8.88 89.61 67.54 1228.97 OK 7035.34 86.59 171.92 7.54 40.86 133.73 299.77 21.49 1095.23
35 -0.01 0.28 4 35 0.00 107.02 35.96 1252.01 OK 7167.28 91.75 90.24 8.26 62.17 68.92 211.90 15.19 1183.10
ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional Development

SSES USING REFINED METHOD

At Service
Check

OK
OK

OK
OK
OK

OK
OK
OK

OK
OK
OK
Project Name :
DESIGN SHEET ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional Development

Designed : Date : 5/19/2019


Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

GIRDER STRESSES

A. Check stresses at transfer (Basic Section)

fci = 21.00 MPa


fti = -3.73 MPa

Top Fiber Bottom Fiber

x e Pi Girder SW Stress Remarks Stress

0.00 -0.01 7167.28 0.00 11.13 OK! 10.81


3.50 0.24 7035.34 767.49 7.44 OK! 14.20
7.00 0.45 6929.66 1427.27 4.56 OK! 16.84
10.50 0.59 6866.77 1898.54 2.59 OK! 18.67
14.00 0.68 6847.25 2181.30 1.43 OK! 19.81
17.50 0.71 6871.70 2275.55 1.01 OK! 20.31
21.00 0.68 6847.25 2181.30 1.43 OK! 19.81
24.50 0.59 6866.77 1898.54 2.59 OK! 18.67
28.00 0.45 6929.66 1427.27 4.56 OK! 16.84
31.50 0.24 7035.34 767.49 7.44 OK! 14.20
35.00 -0.01 7167.28 0.00 11.13 OK! 10.81

B. Check stresses at slab pouring (Basic Section)

fci = 21.00 MPa


fti = -3.73 MPa

Top Fiber Bottom Fiber

Location e Pi Girder SW Mshd Stress Remarks Stress

0.00 -0.01 7167.28 0.00 0.00 11.13 OK! 10.81


3.50 0.24 7035.34 767.49 789.53 10.31 OK! 11.25
7.00 0.45 6929.66 1427.27 1468.25 9.90 OK! 11.34
10.50 0.59 6866.77 1898.54 1953.05 9.70 OK! 11.36
14.00 0.68 6847.25 2181.30 2243.92 9.59 OK! 11.41
17.50 0.71 6871.70 2275.55 2340.88 9.52 OK! 11.55
21.00 0.68 6847.25 2181.30 2243.92 9.59 OK! 11.41
24.50 0.59 6866.77 1898.54 1953.05 9.70 OK! 11.36
28.00 0.45 6929.66 1427.27 1468.25 9.90 OK! 11.34
31.50 0.24 7035.34 767.49 789.53 10.31 OK! 11.25
35.00 -0.01 7167.28 0.00 0.00 11.13 OK! 10.81

C. Check stresses at service (Permanent Loads)

fci = 18.45 MPa


fti = -1.60 MPa

Top Fiber Bottom Fiber

Location ebasic Pe Girder SW Mshd Matt MDW Stress Remarks Stress

0.00 -0.01 6772.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.52 OK! 10.22
3.50 0.24 6269.77 767.49 789.53 308.75 229.70 10.52 OK! 8.00
7.00 0.45 5774.05 1427.27 1468.25 574.16 427.16 11.34 OK! 5.06
10.50 0.59 5420.14 1898.54 1953.05 763.74 568.20 12.38 OK! 2.48
14.00 0.68 5221.07 2181.30 2243.92 877.49 652.82 13.18 OK! 0.81
17.50 0.71 5179.29 2275.55 2340.88 915.40 681.03 13.45 OK! 0.32
Project Name :
DESIGN SHEET ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional Development

Designed : Date : 5/19/2019


Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

21.00 0.68 5221.07 2181.30 2243.92 877.49 652.82 13.18 OK! 0.81
24.50 0.59 5420.14 1898.54 1953.05 763.74 568.20 12.38 OK! 2.48
28.00 0.45 5774.05 1427.27 1468.25 574.16 427.16 11.34 OK! 5.06
31.50 0.24 6269.77 767.49 789.53 308.75 229.70 10.52 OK! 8.00
35.00 -0.01 6772.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.52 OK! 10.22
Project Name :
DESIGN SHEET ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional Development

Designed : Date : 5/19/2019


Checked : Date : 5/19/2019
Item: TYPE V GIRDER DESIGN - FOR
COMPARISON VS MIDAS Filename :

D. Check stresses at service (Service I)

fci = 24.60 MPa


fti = -1.60 MPa

Top Fiber Bottom Fiber

Location ebasic Pe Girder SW Mshd Matt MDW MLL MPL Stress Remarks Stress

0.00 -0.01 6772.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.52 OK!
3.50 0.24 6269.77 767.49 789.53 308.75 229.70 836.02 194.67 11.90 OK!
7.00 0.45 5774.05 1427.27 1468.25 574.16 427.16 1597.92 345.24 13.94 OK!
10.50 0.59 5420.14 1898.54 1953.05 763.74 568.20 2285.70 451.71 16.05 OK!
14.00 0.68 5221.07 2181.30 2243.92 877.49 652.82 2678.49 514.08 17.45 OK!
17.50 0.71 5179.29 2275.55 2340.88 915.40 681.03 2865.72 532.35 17.99 OK!
21.00 0.68 5221.07 2181.30 2243.92 877.49 652.82 2678.49 514.08 17.45 OK!
24.50 0.59 5420.14 1898.54 1953.05 763.74 568.20 2285.70 451.71 16.05 OK!
28.00 0.45 5774.05 1427.27 1468.25 574.16 427.16 1597.92 345.24 13.94 OK!
31.50 0.24 6269.77 767.49 789.53 308.75 229.70 836.02 194.67 11.90 OK!
35.00 -0.01 6772.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.52 OK!

E. Check stresses at service (Service III)

fci = 24.60 MPa


fti = -1.60 MPa

Top Fiber Bottom Fiber

Location ebasic Pe Girder SW Mshd Matt MDW MLL MPL Stress Remarks Stress

0.00 -0.006 6772.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.22
3.50 0.239 6269.77 767.49 789.53 308.75 229.70 836.02 194.67 7.57
7.00 0.446 5774.05 1427.27 1468.25 574.16 427.16 1597.92 345.24 4.26
10.50 0.594 5420.14 1898.54 1953.05 763.74 568.20 2285.70 451.71 1.28
14.00 0.682 5221.07 2181.30 2243.92 877.49 652.82 2678.49 514.08 -0.61
17.50 0.712 5179.29 2275.55 2340.88 915.40 681.03 2865.72 532.35 -1.22
21.00 0.682 5221.07 2181.30 2243.92 877.49 652.82 2678.49 514.08 -0.61
24.50 0.594 5420.14 1898.54 1953.05 763.74 568.20 2285.70 451.71 1.28
28.00 0.446 5774.05 1427.27 1468.25 574.16 427.16 1597.92 345.24 4.26
31.50 0.239 6269.77 767.49 789.53 308.75 229.70 836.02 194.67 7.57
35.00 -0.006 6772.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.22
stitutional Development

5/19/2019
5/19/2019

Bottom Fiber

Remarks

OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!

Bottom Fiber

Remarks

OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!

Bottom Fiber

Remarks

OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
stitutional Development

5/19/2019
5/19/2019

OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
stitutional Development

5/19/2019
5/19/2019

Bottom Fiber

Remarks

Bottom Fiber

Remarks

OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
OK!
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : DLSI Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date :
Item: SINGLE-SPAN PSCG CALCULATIONS
Filename :

15. DETERMINE CAMBER

1. Deflection due to prestressing force:

ee cgc
P P
ec cgs

�=−(𝑃𝑙^2)/8𝐸𝐼[𝑒_𝑒+5/6 (𝑒_𝑐−𝑒_𝑒 )]

Cable ec ee e' Pi δPi


C1 0.712 -0.49 1.200 1652.24 19.95
C2 0.712 -0.24 0.950 1652.24 21.57
C3 0.712 0.01 0.700 1652.24 23.20
C4 0.712 0.26 0.450 1514.55 22.75
C5 0.712 0.51 0.200 1514.55 24.24
δPi = 111.70 mm ↑

2. Deflection due to selfweight:

�_𝑚𝑎𝑥=(5𝜔𝑙^4)/384𝐸𝐼

δG = -46.32 mm ↓
3. Deflection due to slab, haunch, and diaphragm:
δw = -47.65 mm ↓
4. Deflection due to attachments:
δSDL = -18.63 mm ↓
5. Deflection due to future wearing surface and utilities
δDW = -13.86 mm ↓

Transfer Multiplier Final


Load δP (mm.) Multiplier δP (mm.)
(Composite)

wPI 111.70 1.00 111.70 2.20 245.75


wG -46.32 1.00 -46.32 2.40 -111.18

ws -47.65 2.30 -109.60


wSDL -18.63 3.00 -55.90
wDW -13.86 2.30 -31.89
Final δ 65.38 -14.77 -62.82
Project Name : ADB - Road Improvement and Institutional
DESIGN SHEET Development
Designed : DLSI Date : 5/19/2019
Checked : Date :
Item: SINGLE-SPAN PSCG CALCULATIONS
Filename :

PCI multiplers for Long-Term Camber and Deflection


Without Composite With Composite Topping
Topping
At erection:
1.) Deflection (downward) component-apply to the elastic deflection
1.85 1.85
due to the member weight at release of prestress
2.) Camber (upward) component-apply to the elastic camber
1.80 1.80
due to prestress at release of prestress
Final:
3.) Deflection (downward) component-apply to the elastic deflection
2.70 2.40
due to the member weight at release of prestress
4.) Camber (upward) component-apply to the elastic camber
2.45 2.20
due to prestress at release of prestress
5.) Deflection (downward) component-apply to the elastic deflection
3.00 3.00
due to the superimposed dead load only
6.) Deflection (downward) component-apply to the elastic deflection
- 2.30
caused by the composite topping

Immediate Deflection at midspan, b (rounded up to nearest unit) = 66.00 mm

a1
  a b a
     
L
By ratio and proportion,
 

𝑎_1/ 〖 (𝐿/4) 〗 ^2 =𝑏/ 〖 (𝐿/2) 〗 ^2

a1 = 16.50 mm
a (rounded up to nearest unit) = 50.00 mm

S-ar putea să vă placă și