Nagaon-IX-2011-12 - Jugijan Iwmp PDF

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF IWMP
(2011– 2016)
Micro Watershed & Micro : Borpukhuri MWS (3B2A1Ca)

Watershed Code No
Dighalbali MWS (3B2A1Cb)
Hawaipur MWS (3B2A1Cc)
Kumrakata MWS (3B2A1Cd)
Radhanagar MWS (3B2A1Ce)
IWMP project : NAGAON-9 (JUGIJAN IWMP)
Block : Jugijan, Dhalpukhuri Dev. Block
District : Nagaon
Name of the PIA : Divisional Soil Conservation Office,
Nagaon Division, Katimari, Nagaon,
Assam
1
Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-
CHAPTER 1 Introduction and Background
CHAPTER 2 General Description of Project Area
CHAPTER – 3 Base Line Information of Watershed
CHAPTER – 4 Institutional Building and Project Management
CHAPTER – 5 Management/Action Plan
CHAPTER 6 Capacity Building Plan
CHAPTER 7 Phasing of Programme and Budgeting
CHAPTER 8 Consolidation and Completion of Various Works
CHAPTER – 9 Expected Outcomes
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Project Background:
1 Name of the State Assam
2 Name of the project NAGAON-9 (JUGIJAN IWMP)
3 Name of the District Nagaon
4 Names of the Blocks Jugijan, Dhalpukhuri
5 Names of Gram Panchayats 1. Radha Nagar 2. Milik Basti 3. Singari Basti 4. Dimrupar
5. Kumrakata 6. Barpukhuri 7. Kandhuli Mari
6 MWS Name Census Code Block Name GP Name

Borpukhuri 1050600 Jugijan Barpukhuri
Dakhin Bidya Nagar 1050700 Jugijan Singari Basti
Hojai Town No-1 1006000
Borpukhuri MWS Matikhola 1044200 Jugijan Radha Nagar
Rampur 1050800 Dhal Pukhuri Milik Basti
Silguri 1044400 Jugijan Radha Nagar
Singari Basti 1050400 Dhal Pukhuri Singari Basti
Uttar Bidya Nagar 1050500 Jugijan Radha Nagar
Uttar Matikhola 1044300 Jugijan Radha Nagar
Amtola 1018100 Dhal Pukhuri Milik Basti
Bishnupur 1051100 Dhal Pukhuri Milik Basti
Names & Dighalbali 1051700 Dhal Pukhuri Singari Basti
Census Dighalbali MWS
Maina Pathar 1050300 Dhal Pukhuri Singari Basti
Code of
Villages Pachim Amtola 1051000 Dhal Pukhuri Milik Basti
covered Pachim Nandapur 1052000 Dhal Pukhuri Nandapur
Hawaipur 1051800 Dhal Pukhuri Milik Basti
Hawaipur R.F.
Hawaipur MWS
Farmapar Dhal Pukhuri Farmapar
Milik Basti 1051900 Dhal Pukhuri Milik Basti
Dakhin Kumrakata No 1 1051200 Dhal Pukhuri Kumrakata
Kumraka D. Reserve 1049700 Dhal Pukhuri Kumrakata
Kumrakata MWS
Kumrakat (F.V.) 1049800 Dhal Pukhuri Singari Basti
Uttar Kumrakata No.1 1050000 Dhal Pukhuri Kumrakata
Kachari Basti 1044700 Jugijan Barpukhuri
Pub Kandulimari 1043900 Jugijan Kandhuli Mari
Radhanagar No.1 1044000 Jugijan Radha Nagar
Radhanagar MWS
Rajabari Grant 0984800 Jugijan Rajabari
Saotal Basti 1044500 Jugijan Radha Nagar
Thikadar Basti 1044600 Jugijan Barpukhuri
2
7 Four major reasons for selection 1. There is no means of water harvesting and conservation
of watershed means to have a good crop round the year.
2. A large portion of the population is under poverty.
3. Acute shortage of drinking and irrigation water
4. There is no other sector available for livelihood for the
landless and / or the poorest.
8 Name, Address , Phone No and Nagaon Soil Conservation Department, Nagaon,Assam
Reg.No.. of the PIA(s)
9 Date of approval of Watershed
Development Plan by the DPC
10 Area of the Project (ha.) 9342Ha
11 Area proposed to be treated
(ha.) 5500 Ha
12 Financial Year of sanction 2011-12
13 Project duration
14 Project Cost (Rs. in Lakhs) 660 Lakhs
15 Date of Sanction by State
authority
16 Date of Release of 1st
Installment of Central
Assistance (To be filled by
DoLR)
17 Any other, please specify
3
Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) is a modified programme of previous
Drought Prone Areas Programme (DPAP), Desert Development Programme (DDP) and Integrated
Wastelands Development Programme (IWDP) of the Department of Land Resources, Government of
India. The scheme was launched during 2009-10. The main objectives of the IWMP are to restore the
ecological balance by harnessing, conserving and developing degraded natural resources such as soil,
vegetative cover and water. The outcomes are prevention of soil erosion, regeneration of natural
vegetation, rain water harvesting and recharging of the ground water table. This enables multi-cropping
and the introduction of diverse agro-based activities, which help to provide sustainable livelihoods to the
people residing in the watershed area.
Every land area, regardless of its location, is part of a watershed. Some are hilly and others are
relatively flat. Every watershed has a physical landscape a complex terrain of landforms, water
resources, vegetation, animals and their habitats, human beings and the structures they have built. At
the watershed scale, conflicts over water and land resources are inherently multi-attribute, multi-
stakeholder, and multi-discipline decision problems. Watershed systems from those with many small
tributaries to large-scale lake systems and river basins provide direct inputs to economic processes,
serve as waste sinks for economic output, and provide ecosystem services that make life possible.
In recent years, the concepts of integrated watershed management have gained increasing
attention as strategies for sustainable resource use within a complex multi-institutional regulatory
context. Watershed is a basic hydrologic unit, and hydrologic and ecologic processes govern the quality
of soil and water resources within the watershed. Soil degradative processes are accentuated by
anthropogenic factors. It is appropriate; therefore, that issues related to sustainable management of
natural resources (e.g., food security and environment quality) are addressed within the context of
watershed management.
Integrated Watershed management implies rational utilization of natural resources for optimal
and sustained production with minimum hazard to environment. It requires collection and analysis of
information from multiple services to ensure sustainable economic and social progress of a watershed.
In India despite of having a good network of streams and rivers the region is facing the crisis of water
stress and degradation of land, which in turns creates hurdles for million of farmers in practicing
agriculture. In case of Assam, the Brahmaputra and Barak are the major river systems having a dense
network of tributaries that have created a large fluvial base for the entire geographical area of the state.
Assam experiences moderately hot and humid weather situation, through seasonal variation of pre-
monsoon, monsoon, post-monsoon and dry-winter. The clouds brought by the south-west monsoon get
4
intercepted by the ridges of Khasi and Jaintia hills causing instability and heavy rainfall. The rain-
bearing cloud which passes the ridges of Meghalaya precipitates in Brahmaputra Valley. It is
noteworthy that the central part of the region, mainly the southern part of Nagaon district and part of
Karbi-Anglong and Dima-Hasao districts belongs to rain shadow areas.
Problems:
The Jugijan Watershed is located in the Southern part of Nagaon District, Assam. The
geographically the project area is located between 92°45'12.974"E to 92°52'41.05"E longitude and
26°2'55.902"N to 25°55'39.882"N latitude. The watershed area covered 30 numbers of revenue
villages under Jugijan and Dhalpukhuri dev. Block. The total project area of the watershed is about
9342 Ha.
The project site of Jugijan watershed is located in the Central Brahmaputra Valley Agro-climatic zones
of Assam, where the areas is encircled by the Plateaus of Karbi-Anglong on south, South–East and
South–West along with Hilly ranges of Bura-Pahar in the east which creates barrier in the inflow of the
moisture bearing winds and creating the entire area as a rain shadow zone. The average rainfall in the
area was only 1,206.37mm during 1965-76 with 29.76% variability (CV) of rainfall in the entire district
during the period. Moreover this zone is belongs to Southern Assam meteorological sub-division
experiencing low monsoonal rainfall during last decades. Moreover, analysis of meteorological data of
2009 of the area also indicates that it was experience with severe draught like situation even in the
month of July. This situation indicates that .the area needs interventions for pragmatic water resource
management along with better management of natural resources including land resources. In this
perspective also interventions under IWMP programme will consider to be ideal not only to meet the
present requirements but it may also help in developing resilience and adoptability to face the
challenges weather and climate related anomalies.
There is significant variation of altitude within the region. The north-western and South-western part are
comparatively high than the other parts. The average height from mean sea level is 90 meters in north-
western part and its 89 meters in the South-western part. The central part of the region is having an
average height of 85 meters. So, there is an average gradient pattern from north-west to north-east and
from south-west to south-east. The streams in the southern portion of the area including Dimaru play a
significant role in water regime of the area.
5
The region is having a population density of 515 persons /sq.km with per capita agricultural land
availability is of – 0.106 hectares, which itself indicates population pressure over the regions and its link
with food security. From these perspectives also it is desired that the proposed intervention under
IWMP programme can able to address these issues pragmatically.
The Jugijan Watershed is characterized by undulating topography with numerous streams and
wetlands. The major problems of the watershed are – Firstly degradation and congestion of natural
water bodies like wetlands and other natural drainage secondly, flood is a major concern for the
watershed which cause instant devastation of the life and properties, thirdly, run-off originating from
seasonal rain attain high velocity due to medium to steep gradient which prevail in the watershed and
thereby causes all types of soil erosion hazards. Fourthly, lack of sufficient vegetal cover in the project
area is a permanent factor effecting the infiltration and percolation of surface flow leading to severe
moisture stress in the soil which affects the economy of the people in the long run. Besides above, the
uneven rainfall, river bank erosion, lack of irrigation facilities, damage caused by pest and diseases in
agricultural production etc are also important problems in the project area.
Need and Scope for Watershed Development
Degradation of soil and water resources is considered not only as an utmost constraint to sustainable
agricultural development but also a threat to the society. Poor ecosystem management has and will
result in the impaired functioning of watershed and will continue to do so in the future and the need to
protect and preserve the quality of the ecosystem is very essential.
Due to rapid growth of population there is an excessive demand for more land both for agriculture and
non-agriculture use. This has created a vast stretches of wastelands and some are on the verge of
becoming wastelands. There is need to reverse the trend by treating wastelands. Land which is
degraded by natural forces needs improvement by appropriate interventions.
Watershed management is the implementation of management systems that ensure the

preservation, conservation and sustainable use of all land and water resources. Watershed
management also integrates various aspects of forestry, agriculture, hydrology, ecology, soils etc. for
choosing acceptable management alternative within the specific social and economic context. As
mention above, the major problems of the Dimaru Watershed are degradation of Natural Resources,
soil erosion, siltation etc. and therefore there is a huge scope for taking up watershed development
activities in the watershed area.
6
There are challenges of eco-friendly sustainable development can be addressed by the watershed
management through judicious use of land and water resources through proper empowerment of
general masses of the area. Proper measures for water harvesting in so doing farmers participatory
watershed management approaches have to be adopted with more focuses on following aspects:
 Farmer participatory approach through cooperation and not through contractual mode.
 Use of new scientific tools for management and monitoring of watersheds through linking of on-
station and on-farm watersheds.
 A holistic system’s approach to improve livelihoods of people and not merely conservation of
soil and water compartmental approach.
 A consortium of institutions for technical backstopping of the on-farm watersheds.
 A micro-watershed within the watershed where farmers conduct strategic research with
technical guidance from the scientists. Planned gradual shift from contractual mode of
participation to consultative and collective mode of participation.
 Low-cost soil and water conservation measures and structures throughout the top sequence to
achieve equity.
 Amalgamation of traditional knowledge and new knowledge for efficient management of natural
resources.
 Emphasis on individual farmer-based conservation measures for increasing productivity of
individual farms and private economic gains along with community-based soil and water
conservation measures for ecosystem services.
 Minimize free supply of inputs for undertaking evaluation of technologies. Farmers are
encouraged to evaluate new technologies themselves with empowerment.
 Continuous monitoring, evaluation and refinement of options by the stakeholders.
 Empowerment of community individuals and strengthening of village institutions for managing
natural resources.
Table No. 1.2 Need and Scope for Watershed Development
Weightage
Project
Project Name Type i ii Iii iv v vi vii ix x xi xii xiii
NAGAON-9 (JUGIJAN IWMP) Plain 7.5 5 0 5 5 - 10 5 15 15 10 5
*As per PPR
7
Slno Criteria Max Ranges and Scores
. Score
i Poverty index(%of 10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20%
poor to population) (2.5)
ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40% 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20%
(10) (3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are Actual wages are
significantly lower equal to or higher
than minimum than minimum
wages (5) wages (0)
iv % of small and 10 More than 80% 50 to 80% (5) Less than 50 (3)
marginal farmers (10)
v Ground water status 15 Over exploited Critical (10) Sub critical (5) Safe (0)
(15)
vi Moisture index/ 10 -66.7 & below -33.3 to -66.6 (5) 0 to -33.2 (0)
DPAP/DDP Block (10) DDP Block DPAP Block Non DPAP/DDP
Block
vii Area under assured 15 Less than 10% 10 to 20% (10) 20 to 30% (5) Above 30%
irrigation (15) (Reject)
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic Partially Fully
village (7.5) covered (5) covered (0)
ix Degraded land 15 High – above Medium – 10 to Low – less than
20% (15) 20 % (10) 10 % of TGA
(5)
x Productivity potential 10 Lands with low Land with Lands with high
of the land production & moderate production &
where productivity production & where
can be where productivity productivity can
significantly can be enhanced be marginally
enhanced with with reasonable enhanced with
reasonable efforts efforts (5) reasonable
(10) efforts (0)
xi Contiguity to another 10 Contiguous to Contiguity with in Neither
watershed that has previously treated the micro contiguous to
already been watershed & watersheds in the previously
8
developed/treated contiguity within project but non treated
the micro contiguous to watershed nor
watersheds in the previously treated contiguity within
project (10) watershed (5) the micro
watersheds in
the project (0)
xii Cluster approach in 15 Above 6 micro- 4 to 6 micro 2 to 4 micro
the plains (more than watersheds in watersheds in watersheds in
one contiguous micro- cluster (15) cluster (10) cluster (5)
watersheds in the
project)
xiii Cluster approach in 15 Above 5 micro- 3 to 5 micro 2 to 3 micro
the hills (More than watersheds in watersheds in watersheds in
one contiguous micro- cluster (15) cluster (10) cluster (5)
watersheds in the
project)
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5
9
Table no.1.3: Watershed information
Sl Name of Geographical Treatable Approval

Watershed Code Villages to be Treated
no Project Area(Ha) Area(Ha) Year
1 Borpukhuri 223
2 Dakhin Bidya Nagar 126
3 Hojai Town No-1 85
6 Borpukhuri MWS Matikhola 186
7 Rampur 107
8 Silguri 161
9 Singari Basti 188
10 Uttar Bidya Nagar 103
11 Uttar Matikhola 247
NAGAON-9 (JUGIJAN IWMP)
12 Amtola 272
13 Bishnupur 163
14 Dighalbali 443
Dighalbali MWS
15 Maina Pathar 212
5500 Ha 2011-12
16 Pachim Amtola 309
17 Pachim Nandalalpur 144
18 Hawaipur 369
19 Hawaipur MWS Hawaipur R.F. 1733
20 Milik Basti 608
21 Dakhin Kumrakata No 1 189
22 Kumraka D. Reserve 863
Kumrakata MWS
23 Kumrakat (F.V.) 919
24 Uttar Kumrakata No.1 40
25 Kachari Basti 88
26 Pub Kandulimari 212
27 Radhanagar No.1 313
Radhanagar MWS
28 Rajabari Grant 346
29 Saotal Basti 157
30 Thikadar Basti 221
10
11
Table No.1.4: Status of other development project in the area
Sl. Name of the Sponsoring agency Objectives of the programme/scheme Year of Villages covered Estimated number of
no programme/scheme commencement beneficiaries
1 The Mahatma Gandhi National Department of Rural is to enhance livelihood security in rural areas 2009-10
Rural Employment Guarantee Development, Ministry by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed
Act (MGNREGA) of Rural Development wage employment in a financial year to every
household whose adult members volunteer to
do unskilled manual work.
2 National Rural Drinking Water Ministry of Drinking Source sustainability, community managed 2009 -
Programme Water & Sanitation, programmes and recognition of the gap
Govt. of India between infrastructure created and service
available, Installation of a water source will not
be considered as the criteria for fully covered
habitation, but adequate water supply received
by all household of the habitations will be the
criteria. of water conservation and introduction
of catchment protection schemes for surface
water;
1
Table No. 1.5: Status of previous watershed programme
S. Project name Year Name No. Of Watershed Area Funding source Nodal agency PIA Total Expenditure % financial % physical
No started of micro codes under cost incurred up completion completion
villages watershed treatment to start of
IWMP
1 Kolong IWDP 2000 - 26 - 12,500 Ha Department Of Deptt. Of DRDA Nagaon 500 495.93 99 -
2 - - Land Resources, Panchayat & Raha, 45 -
Ministry Of Rural Rural Dolongghat, &
Santijan Airawat Development, Development Batadraba Dev.
IWDP 2003 17 8,180 Ha Government Of Block 490.8 220.01
India Jugijan & 45
Dimaru Lankajan Dholpukhuri
3 IWDP 2003 - 12 - 6,000 Ha Dev.Block 360 161.37 -
Khring-Khring Odali & Lumding 42
4 IWDP 2005 - 10 - 5,000 Ha Dev. Block 300 125.45 -
Bajiagaon Dev. 45
5 Dijuvelly IWDP 2005 - 12 - 6,000 Ha Block 360 161.15 -
Lowkhowa Dev. 45
6 Sonai IWDP 2005 - 12 - 6,000 Ha Block. 360 160.29 -
Sonai Latari 29
7 IWDP 2006 - 12 - 6,000 Ha Juria Dev. Block 360 104.14 -
Sonai Leteri Khagorijan Dev. 36
8 IWDP 2006 - 12 - 6,000 Ha Block 360 128.73 -
Kathiatoli Dev. 45
9 Nikhari IWDP 2006 - 12 - 6,000 Ha Block 360 162.02 -
Binakandi Dev. 45
10 Jamuna IWDP 2006 - 12 - 6,000 Ha Block 360 162.02 -
2
CHAPTER 2
General Description of Project Area
Table 2.1: Location

Longitude 92°45'12.974"E to 92°52'41.05"E
Latitude 26°2'55.902"N to 25°55'39.882"N
State Assam
District Nagaon
Subdivision Hojai
Block Jugijan and Dhalpukhuri
Panchayat 1. Radha Nagar 2. Milik Basti 3. Singari Basti 4. Dimrupar 5. Kumrakata 6.
Barpukhuri 7. Kandhuli Mari
Villages Borpukhuri
Dakhin Bidya Nagar
Hojai Town No-1
Hojai Town No-2
Hojai Town No-3
Matikhola
Rampur
Silguri
Singari Basti
Uttar Bidya Nagar
Uttar Matikhola
Amtola
Bishnupur
Dighalbali
Maina Pathar
Pachim Amtola
Pachim Nandalalpur
Hawaipur
Hawaipur R.F.
Milik Basti
Dakhin Kumrakata No 1
Kumraka D. Reserve
Kumrakat (F.V.)
Uttar Kumrakata No.1
Kachari Basti
Pub Kandulimari
Radhanagar No.1
Rajabari Grant
Saotal Basti
Thikadar Basti
Approach Road Hojai Town Road
1
Location Map
2
Micro Watershed Map
3
Location of Watershed :
The Jugijan Watershed is located in the Southern part of Nagaon District, Assam. The
geographically the project area is located between 92°45'12.974"E to 92°52'41.05"E longitude and
26°2'55.902"N to 25°55'39.882"N latitude. The watershed area covered 30 numbers of revenue
villages under Jugijan and Dhalpukhuri dev. Block. The total project area of the watershed is about
9342 Ha.
The project site of Dimaru watershed is located in the Central Brahmaputra Valley Agro-climatic zones
of Assam, where the areas is encircled by the Plateaus of Karbi-Anglong on south, South–East and
South–West along with Hilly ranges of Bura-Pahar in the east which creates barrier in the inflow of the
moisture bearing winds and creating the entire area as a rain shadow zone.
Physiography:
The physiography of the project area is characterized by a number of swamps, water logged
low areas, lakes and marshes. The builtup plain is an extensive alluvial plain which covers almost entire
watershed area. The region has a lattice network of numerous river channels and it characterized with
lakes and marshes. Owing to the intrusion of water from the river Brahmaputra during the monsoons,
many swamps and marshes are created within this built up plain.
The area forms a significant part of the vast alluvial flood plain of the Brahmaputra, dominated by a
profusion of depositional land forms including abandoned channels, not to mention vast lengths of
wetland.
Climate:
The general climate of the district is characterised by hot and wet summers and dry, cool winters. The
overall climate can be divided as pre-monsoon, post monsoon and winter. The pre-monsoon occurs
from the month of March to May. The rainfall during this period range between twenty to thirty percent
of the annual precipitation. The monsoon season starts in June and continues throughout the month of
August. The post monsoon season extends from September to November; and thereafter, both
temperature and rainfall decreases to a cold and dry winter which starts from November and continues
up to February. Post winter, from the month of February to April, is generally dry and pleasant. The
mean of maximum and minimum temperatures varies from 29.90C to 18.90C and the average annual
rainfall is 421.71cm. Maximum rainfall is received from the south west monsoon during June to August.
Rainfall Data of Nagaon District for Last 5 Years (2006-2010)
4
Feb Sept- Oct- Nove Dece-
year January ruary March April May June July August ember ober mber mber
2006 0 23 13 59 186 187 160 157 180 62 22 23
2007 0 57 13 160 109 290 298 240 281 123.6 46 0
2008 17 3 62 160 100 254 161 288 216 94 0 0
2009 0 2 23 28 79 87 159 150 85 101 1 0
2010 0 0 46 169 206 226 163 363 161 106 6 3
Source: India Meteorological Department, HYDROMET DIVISION.
Variation in Rainfall : (from January to June)
5
Variation in Rainfall : (from July to December)
Annual Rainfall for Last Seven Years (in mm)

Year Total
2004 1669.5
2005 1429.4
2006 1320.9
2007 1637.7
2008 1813.5
2009 1296.3
2010 1800.6
Graph : Variation in Annual Rainfall of Nagaon District, Assam for last 7 Years
6
Departures of Rainfall:
Year
year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 -100 24 -76 -54 -10 -44 -59 -54 -25 -53 11 148
2007 -100 211 -75 25 -47 -13 -24 -30 43 -7 128 -100
2008 24 -81 16 25 -51 -24 -59 -16 -9 -29 -100 -100
2009 -100 -90 -58 -78 -61 -74 -59 -56 -64 -24 -97 -99
2010 -100 -100 -15 32 1 -32 -58 6 -32 -20 -70 -66
(% Dep. are the Departures of rainfall from the long period averages of rainfall for the District.)
(Graph shown Departure of rainfall of Nagaon District since 2006 to 2010)
Drainage & Water bodies:
The watershed area is endowed with mainly three perennial streams namely Jugi Jan, Kopili, Hawaipur
River etc. Apart from the above streams the watershed is also endowed with many beels (wetlands).
7
Soil:
The general and average soil character of cultivable land in the watershed is mainly alluvial and
composed of mixture of sand (course to loamy). From soil resource mapping and taxonomic
classification carried by the Natural Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning (NBSSLUP) it is
observed that there are basically three types of taxonomic classification of are found with the watershed
namely - Fine Silty, Typic Udifluvents, Coarse-Silty, Mollic Fluvaquents and Fine Loamy Typic
Dystrochrepts. The characteristics of Fine Silty, Typic Udifluvents is moderately deep, moderately well
drained, very severe flooding associated with deep well drained sandy soils. The
Coarse-Silty, Mollic Fluvaquents is deep well drained having loamy surface with very severe flooding
and Fine Loamy Typic Dystrochrepts is charecterised by Deep, excessively drained, fine loamy soils
occurring on moderately to steeply sloping side slopes having loamy surface with severe erosion.
Characteristics of Dominant Soil:
Particulars Fine Silty, Typic Coarse-loamy, Aeric Coarse-Silty, Mollic

Udifluvents Fluvaquents Fluvaquents
Morphology Valleys Valleys Valleys
Surface Texture loamy loamy loamy
Parent Material Alluvial Alluvial Alluvial
Soil Depth Deep (> 100 cm) Deep (> 100 cm) Deep (> 100 cm)
Particle Size Class Fine Silty Coarse-loamy Coarse-Silty
Mineralogy Mixed Mixed Mixed
Soil temperature regime Hyperthermic (220-280 C) Hyperthermic (220-280 C) Hyperthermic (220-280 C)
Reaction (pH) Slightly Acidic (5.5 -6.5) Neutral (6.5-7.5) Neutral (6.5-7.5)
Drainage Class Moderately Well Well Well
Ground Water Depth Moderately deep (3 Mtr.) Moderately deep (3 Mtr.) Moderately deep (3 Mtr.)
Slope Level to nearly level(0-1%) Level to nearly level(0-1%) Very gently Sloping (1-3%)
8
Drainage Map
9
Slope Map
10
Ground Water:
The depth of ground water level in water table zone varies from 0.41 to 3.07 m bgl in the pre monsoon
period and 0.56 to 3.41 m bgl during post monsoon period. The area is very much suitable for
construction of ground water abstraction structures for discharge ranging from 100-300 M3/hr. Ground
water occurs under water table conditions.
Economy:
The economy of the project area depends on agriculture. Paddy is the major crop and it cultivated in
kharif and land remains uncultivated for rest of the year. The farming system is traditional. Low
agricultural productivity, lack of irrigation facilities, damage cause by pest and diseases are the major
constraints for the agricultural development of the region. Further fishing, livestock rearing handloom
and weaving are other important economic activities of the watershed area.
Land Use/ Land Cover:
The following landuse categories are identified through visual interpretation of remote Sensing Map and
supported by field verification. The identified main landuse categories are –Agricultural land (kharif),
Wetland and rural habitation including homestead plantation.
11
Table no: 2.2 Land Details
Geographical Land under Wasteland

S. Rain-fed area Irrigated Permanent
Names of villages Area of the village Forest Area (ha) agricultural use Non-
No. (ha) Area pastures (ha) Cultivable (ha)
(ha) (ha) cultivable (ha)
1 Borpukhuri 223 0 173 173 0 0 13 0
2 Dakhin Bidya Nagar 126 0 67 67 0 0 6 0
3 Hojai Town No-1 85 0 7 7 0 0 0 0
4 Hojai Town No-2 211 0 20 20 0 0 0 0
5 Hojai Town No-3 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Matikhola 186 0 157 157 0 0 9 0
7 Rampur 107 0 55 55 0 0 0 0
8 Silguri 161 0 108 108 0 0 0 0
9 Singari Basti 188 0 174 174 0 0 1 0
10 Uttar Bidya Nagar 103 0 32 32 0 0 7 0
11 Uttar Matikhola 247 0 223 223 0 0 22 0
12 Amtola 272 0 184 184 0 0 3 0
13 Bishnupur 163 0 129 129 0 0 10 20
14 Dighalbali 443 0 406 406 0 0 12 0
15 Maina Pathar 212 0 119 119 0 0 51 17
16 Pachim Amtola 309 0 172 172 0 0 52 23
17 Pachim Nandalalpur 144 0 128 128 0 0 3 0
18 Hawaipur 369 0 340 340 0 0 0 0
19 Hawaipur R.F. 1733 382 218 218 0 0 112 0
20 Milik Basti 608 7 359 359 0 0 0 0
21 Dakhin Kumrakata No 1 189 0 87 87 0 0 9 0
22 Kumraka D. Reserve 863 0 329 329 0 0 70 21
23 Kumrakat (F.V.) 919 0 504 504 0 0 100 12
24 Uttar Kumrakata No.1 40 0 18 18 0 0 0 0
25 Kachari Basti 88 0 88 88 0 0 0 0
26 Pub Kandulimari 212 0 171 171 0 0 12 0
12
Geographical Land under Wasteland
S. Rain-fed area Irrigated Permanent
Names of villages Area of the village Forest Area (ha) agricultural use Non-
No. (ha) Area pastures (ha) Cultivable (ha)
(ha) (ha) cultivable (ha)
27 Radhanagar No.1 313 0 118 118 0 0 49 10
28 Rajabari Grant 346 0 212 212 0 0 16 0
29 Saotal Basti 157 0 118 118 0 0 12 0
30 Thikadar Basti 221 0 208 208 0 0 6 0
Total 9340 388 4925 4925 0 0 575 103
13
Lulc M
14
Table No. 2.3: Details of the types of areas covered under the project
1 2 3
No. of beneficiaries covered
S. No. Name of Village
MF SF LF Landless Total
1 Borpukhuri 1038 158 31 215 1442

2 Dakhin Bidya Nagar 486 74 15 101 676
3 Hojai Town No-1 354 54 10 74 492
4 Hojai Town No-2 282 43 10 58 393
5 Hojai Town No-3 200 30 6 42 278
6 Matikhola 380 58 11 79 528
7 Rampur 683 104 20 142 949
8 Silguri 199 30 8 40 277
9 Singari Basti 327 51 9 68 455
10 Uttar Bidya Nagar 506 78 14 105 703
11 Uttar Matikhola 192 33 2 40 267
12 Amtola 183 25 8 38 254
13 Bishnupur 83 14 0 18 115
14 Dighalbali 228 36 6 48 318
15 Maina Pathar 79 14 0 17 110
16 Pachim Amtola 241 38 2 55 336
17 Pachim Nandalalpur 79 14 0 17 110
18 Hawaipur 280 44 1 58 383
19 Hawaipur R.F. 0 0 0 0 0
20 Milik Basti 370 57 6 77 510
21 Dakhin Kumrakata No 1 66 11 0 14 91
22 Kumraka D. Reserve 1 0 0 0 1
23 Kumrakat (F.V.) 36 6 0 8 50
24 Uttar Kumrakata No.1 89 14 2 19 124
25 Kachari Basti 99 14 0 20 133
26 Pub Kandulimari 580 90 26 123 819
27 Radhanagar No.1 482 74 7 107 670
28 Rajabari Grant 351 55 3 79 488
29 Saotal Basti 182 27 4 41 254
30 Thikadar Basti 216 33 4 48 301
Total 8292 1279 205 1751 11527
15
Table No. 2.4: Details of Agro-climatic condition
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Name of the Major soil types Major crops
Name of
Sl. Agro-climatic b)
the Area in ha Names of the villages b) Area in
No. zone covers a)Type a) Name Area
Project ha
project area in ha
1 222.78 Borpukhuri Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 223 Paddy 173
2 125.6 Dakhin Bidya Nagar Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 126 Paddy 67
3 85.31 Hojai Town No-1 Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 85 Paddy 7
6 185.54 Matikhola Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 186 Paddy 157
7 107.4 Rampur Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 107 Paddy 55
8 160.69 Silguri Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 161 Paddy 108
NAGAON-9 (JUGIJAN IWMP)
9 188.41 Singari Basti Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 188 Paddy 174
10 103.03 Uttar Bidya Nagar Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 103 Paddy 32
11 246.85 Uttar Matikhola Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 247 Paddy 223
12 Central 272.41 Amtola Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 272 Paddy 184
13 Brahmaputra 162.58 Bishnupur Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 163 Paddy 129
14 Valley 443.4 Dighalbali Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 443 Paddy 406
15 211.5 Maina Pathar Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 212 Paddy 119
16 308.82 Pachim Amtola Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 309 Paddy 172
17 143.63 Pachim Nandalalpur Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 144 Paddy 128
18 368.78 Hawaipur Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 369 Paddy 340
19 1732.59 Hawaipur R.F. Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts), 1733 Paddy 218
20 607.74 Milik Basti Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 608 Paddy 359
21 188.72 Dakhin Kumrakata No 1 Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 189 Paddy 87
22 863.33 Kumraka D. Reserve Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts 863 Paddy 329
23 919.09 Kumrakat (F.V.) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts), 919 Paddy 504
24 40.4 Uttar Kumrakata No.1 Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 40 Paddy 18
25 88.34 Kachari Basti Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 88 Paddy 88
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Name of the Major soil types Major crops
Name of
Sl. Agro-climatic b)
the Area in ha Names of the villages b) Area in
No. zone covers a)Type a) Name Area
Project ha
project area in ha
26 211.7 Pub Kandulimari Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 212 Paddy 171
27 312.78 Radhanagar No.1 Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 313 Paddy 118
28 346.05 Rajabari Grant Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 346 Paddy 212
29 157.09 Saotal Basti Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 157 Paddy 118
30 220.62 Thikadar Basti Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts) 221 Paddy 208
17
Table No. 2.5 Details of flood and drought in the project area
1 2 3 4 5
Periodicity
Sl. Frequency
Particulars Villages Zonation of Flood of Flood Not affected
No.
(1998-2007) during 1998-
2007
No. of villages
1 Flood
Name(s) of villages
Borpukhuri High 7-8 Times
Dakhin Bidya Nagar Moderate 5-6 Times
Hojai Town No-1 Very Low 1-2 Times
Matikhola High 7-8 Times
Rampur High 7-8 Times
Silguri High 7-8 Times
Singari Basti Very High 9-10 Times
Uttar Bidya Nagar Very High 9-10 Times
Uttar Matikhola Moderate 5-6 Times
Amtola High 7-8 Times
Bishnupur High 7-8 Times
Dighalbali High 7-8 Times
Maina Pathar Very High 9-10 Times
Pachim Amtola High 7-8 Times
Pachim Nandalalpur High 7-8 Times
Hawaipur Very High 9-10 Times
Hawaipur R.F. Very Low 1-2 Times
Milik Basti Very High 9-10 Times
Dakhin Kumrakata No 1 Very High 9-10 Times
Kumraka D. Reserve High 7-8 Times
Kumrakat (F.V.) High 7-8 Times
Uttar Kumrakata No.1 High 7-8 Times
Kachari Basti Very High 9-10 Times
Pub Kandulimari High 7-8 Times
Radhanagar No.1 Very High 9-10 Times
Rajabari Grant Moderate 5-6 Times
Saotal Basti Very High 9-10 Times
Thikadar Basti Very High 9-10 Times
Source of Flood Data: NRSC, Hyderabad
18
Table No. 2.6: Details of soil erosion in the project area
1 2 3 4 5
Area affected Run off Average soil loss
Cause Type of erosion
(ha) (mm/ year) (Tonnes/ ha/ year)
Water erosion
Sheet 783
Very Severe (More
Borpukhuri MWS Rill 56
than 40 Ton)
Gully 2
Sheet 386
27 Slight
Dighalbali MWS Rill
(Less than 5 Ton)
Gully 0
Sheet 677
Slight
Hawaipur MWS Rill 48 805
(Less than 5 Ton)
Gully 0
Sheet 503
Slight
Kumrakata MWS Rill 36
(Less than 5 Ton)
Gully 0
Sheet 601
Very Severe (More
Radhanagar MWS Rill 43
than 40 Ton)
Gully 3
Total 3164
19
Table No. 2.7 Details of the Soil pH
Name of the Villages Soil Ph Soil Type

Borpukhuri Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Dakhin Bidya Nagar Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Hojai Town No-1 Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Matikhola Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Rampur Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Silguri Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Singari Basti Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Uttar Bidya Nagar Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Uttar Matikhola Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Amtola Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Bishnupur Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Dighalbali Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Maina Pathar Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Pachim Amtola Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Pachim Nandalalpur Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Hawaipur Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts), Fine (Ultic
Hawaipur R.F. Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Hapludalfs)
Milik Basti Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Dakhin Kumrakata No 1 Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Kumraka D. Reserve Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Hapludalfs)
Kumrakat (F.V.) Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Hapludalfs)
Uttar Kumrakata No.1 Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Kachari Basti Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Pub Kandulimari Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Radhanagar No.1 Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Rajabari Grant Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Saotal Basti Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Thikadar Basti Slighty Acidic (5.5-6.5) Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)
Note: Fine Loamy (Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts) localy known as Old Alluvial Soil
20
Table No.2.7.1 Climatic Condition
Temp(0C)
Relative Humidity(RH) (Year 2009)
(year -2009) Evaporation
Monthly Average Annual Average
Year (2009) Wind (mm per Afternoon
Sl No Rain fall(in rainfall(in mm) Morning Annual run
/month Velocity month)(year (recorded Sunshine
mm) preceding 5 years Max Min (Recorded off(mm/year)
2009) at 13.13 Hrs.
at 6.13 hrs
hrs
1 January 6.6 24.1 11.7 32.8 96 57 4.9
2 February 21.7 26.7 13.1 50.9 94 49 6.1
3 March 26 29 16.1 73.8 95 44 5.1
4 April 154 28.9 20.6 72.1 93 65 5.2
5 May 187.8 30.9 23 96.2 91 69 6.4
6 June 225 33 25.4 93.4 92 70 5.2
7 July 293.4 33 26 94.6 93 70 5.2
1809 805
8 August 286.8 31.8 25.6 81.8 95 74 4.3
9 September 101.5 33.1 25.7 94.7 93 68 6.6
10 October 57.8 30.8 22.6 68.4 95 65 5.9
11 November 18.7 27 16.5 46 97 61 5.9
12 December 0.7 23.3 12.4 31.7 97 64 4.6
13 Average Monthly
Rain fall(in mm) 115.00 69.7
21
Table No.-2.8 Physiographic Features
Name of MWs Elevation(MSL) Slope Range(%) Order of Major Stream Toposequence Average annual soil loss(Ton /
Watershed (Soil series) hectare/year)
Maximum - 81 mtr., Maximum Slope - Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)

Borpukhuri MWS Minimum - 69 mtr. 8.0%, Average Slope- Jugi Jan Very Severe (More than 40 Ton)
Average - 75 mtr. 0.9%
Maximum - 76 mtr., Maximum Slope - Fine Loamy(Typic Haplaquepts)
Dighalbali MWS Minimum - 67 mtr. 1.8%, Average Slope- Jugi Jan,Kopili River Slight (Less than 5 Ton)
Maximum - 79 mtr., Maximum Slope - Fine Loamy(Typic Haplaquepts),
Hawaipur MWS Minimum - 68 mtr. 4.4%, Average Slope- Hawaipur Jan,Kopili River Fine(Ultic Hapludalfs) Slight (Less than 5 Ton)
Maximum - 78 mtr., Maximum Slope - Fine Loamy(Typic Haplaquepts),
Kumrakata MWS Minimum - 67 mtr. 1.8%, Average Slope- Kopili River,Jugi jan Fine(Ultic Hapludalfs) Slight (Less than 5 Ton)
Maximum - 79 mtr., Maximum Slope - Fine Loamy(Typic Haplaquepts)
Radhanagar MWS Minimum - 65mtr. 5.8%, Average Slope- Jugi Jan Very Severe (More than 40 Ton)
Table No. 2.9 Watershed characteristics

Shape index of the watershed Length of main Drainage density Average slope Watershed relief Perimeter of the
stream watershed
- 13536 0.006 0.80% Plain 66795
22
CHAPTER – 3
BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED
Table No. 3.1: Demographic features:
1 2 3.00 4 5
S.No Feature Male Female Total
1 Population 30528 29287 59815
SC 4997 4700 9697
ST 786 798 1584
BC 13000 11000 24000
Others 11745 12789 24534
2 Children(0-6 years) 7108 6024 13132
3 Sex Ratio (Female per 959
Thousand Male)
4 Literacy 72.95% 62.24% 67.71%
Literates 22271 18229 40500
Illiterates 8257 11058 19315
5 Work Force 16307 3792 20099
Agriculture 12828 2515 15343
Industrial/Business 2105 780 2885
Service 1374 497 1871
6 Birth Rate - - -
7 Death Rate - - -
23
Table No. 3.2: Livestock details:
1 2 3
S.No Feature No./ quantity)
1 Milch Animals
Cows 9870
Buffaloes 15
Goat, sheep 15205
2 Draft Animals
Ox
He Buffalo
3 Others
Poultry 25870
Piggery 129
4 Total Milk production from milch animals (ltrs/day) 250
5 Fodder Availability
Dry (Abundant/Sufficient/ Scarce) Sufficient
Green (Abundant/Sufficient/ Scarce) Scarce (occasionaly)
6 Fuel wood Availability (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Scarce
24
Table No.3.3: Socio- economic status:
1 2 3 4 5 6
S. No Type Total No. of Land Holding (Ha) Annual Gross Income (Rs.)
HHs BPL Rain fed Irrigated SC ST Others Total
HHs SC ST Others SC ST Others
1 Marginal 8292 3120 1824 1140 1596 0 0 0 15000 15000 17000 47000
2 Small 1279 281 176 246 0 0 0 25000 25000 25000 75000
Farmers
3 Big farmers 205 45 28 39 0 0 0 60000 60000 70000 190000
4 Landless 1751 1751 - - - - - - - - - -
Total 11527 4871 2151 1344 1882 0 0 0 100000 100000 112000 312000
25
Table No. 3.4: Migration Details:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
No. of Distance of Income from
No. of persons migrating days per destination of Occupation such
year of Major reason(s) for migration from during occupation
Name of Village M F Total migration migrating the village (km) migration (Rs.)
Borpukhuri 288 29 317
Dakhin Bidya Nagar 135 14 149
Hojai Town No-1 98 10 108
Matikhola 106 11 116
Rampur 190 19 209
Silguri 55 6 61
Singari Basti 91 9 100 Lack in sufficient
Uttar Bidya Nagar 141 14 155 employment Daily labour,
Average Rs.
Uttar Matikhola 53 5 59 generation, For Better business,
100 2 km to 50 Km 20,000/- per
Amtola 51 5 56 Opportunity , Lack of vegetable
Annum
Bishnupur 23 2 25 irrigation facility, Mono vendor
Dighalbali 64 6 70 Crop Area etc.
Maina Pathar 22 2 24
Pachim Amtola 67 7 74
Pachim Nandalalpur 22 2 24
Hawaipur 45 8 53
Hawaipur R.F. 0 0 0
Milik Basti 58 10 68
Dakhin Kumrakata No 1 18 2 20
Kumraka D. Reserve 0 0 0
26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
No. of Distance of Income from
No. of persons migrating days per destination of Occupation such
year of Major reason(s) for migration from during occupation
Name of Village M F Total migration migrating the village (km) migration (Rs.)
Kumrakat (F.V.) 10 1 11
Uttar Kumrakata No.1 25 2 27
Kachari Basti 27 3 29
Pub Kandulimari 65 16 81
Radhanagar No.1 34 13 47
Rajabari Grant 98 10 107
Saotal Basti 51 5 56
Thikadar Basti 60 6 66
TOTAL 2031 231 2262
27
Table No. 3.5: Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
No. of ST in No. of SC in No. of Others in No. of BPL in each Bank linkage
Total no. of CBOs No. of members each category each category each category category
Type
No. Bank
of
With With of Loan
Group
S. only only With SHGs Amount
No. Men Women both Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total (Rs.)
(i)
Landless 120 711 831 12 16 28 34 69 103 74 626 700 120 711 831
SHG 15 78 - 93 (ii) MF 37 135 172 2 4 6 12 27 39 23 104 127 37 135 172
(iii) SF 8 12 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 12 20 0 0 20
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 Total 165 858 1023 14 20 34 46 96 142 105 742 847 157 846 1023
(i)
Landless
UGs (ii) MF
(iii) SF
(iv) LF
2 Total
28
Table No. 3.6: Infrastructure Facilities:
1 2 3 4 5
S.No Infrastructure type No./Quantity Distance (km) Status (description)
1 Educational Institutions
Anganwadi 45
Primary School 39
Secondary school 8
Govt. College 2
Vocational Institutions 2
2 Service Institutions
Bank 3
Post office 9
Primary Health Care Center 1
Veterinary Center 2
Markets/ Village Haat 5
3 No. of bore wells/pump sets -
(Functional)
4 No. of Milk collection centers -
( Union/ Society/ Pvt.

Agency/Others)
Total Quantity of surplus -
milk
5 Road Connectivity (to main Yes
road by an all-weather road)
(Yes/No)
6 Bus facility (Yes/No) Yes

7 No. of HHs provided 10203
electricity
8 No. of HHs with access to 1190
drinking water
9 Access to Agro Industries No
(Yes/No)
10 Any other facilities (specify----
---------)
29
Table No.3.7 Land use pattern (in Hectares)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*
Uncultivated Private
miscellaneous use
Cultivated area
Community Land
Land under Non

Agriculture Use
more than once
Gross Cropped
Net Sown Area
Net Area sown

land
Geographical
Forest Area
Land Under
Permanent
Pastures
Village
Area#
S.
Area
No Temporary Permanent Cultivated Cultivated
fallow Fallow Rainfed Irrigated
1 Borpukhuri 223 0 0 34 0 16 0 0 173 0 173 10 183

2 Dakhin Bidya Nagar 126 0 0 26 0 32 0 0 67 0 67 18 86
3 Hojai Town No-1 85 0 0 5 0 73 0 0 7 0 7 7 14
4 Hojai Town No-2 211 0 0 79 0 112 0 0 20 0 20 5 25
5 Hojai Town No-3 104 0 0 29 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Matikhola 186 0 0 21 0 1 7 0 157 0 157 46 203
7 Rampur 107 0 0 44 0 9 0 0 55 0 55 25 80
8 Silguri 161 0 0 18 0 35 0 0 108 0 108 3 111
9 Singari Basti 188 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 174 0 174 30 205
10 Uttar Bidya Nagar 103 0 0 16 0 55 0 0 32 0 32 8 41
11 Uttar Matikhola 247 0 0 5 0 0 19 0 223 0 223 4 226
12 Amtola 272 0 0 88 0 1 0 0 184 0 184 86 270
13 Bishnupur 163 0 0 3 0 0 30 0 129 0 129 79 208
14 Dighalbali 443 0 0 33 0 4 0 0 406 0 406 233 638
15 Maina Pathar 212 0 0 30 0 0 63 0 119 0 119 85 204
16 Pachim Amtola 309 0 0 72 0 0 65 0 172 0 172 106 278
17 Pachim Nandalalpur 144 0 0 12 0 4 0 0 128 0 128 33 161
18 Hawaipur 369 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 340 0 340 98 438
19 Hawaipur R.F. 1733 382 0 1096 0 0 37 0 218 0 218 108 326
20 Milik Basti 608 7 0 242 0 0 0 0 359 0 359 174 533
21 Dakhin Kumrakata No 1 189 0 0 93 0 0 9 0 87 0 87 73 160
30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*
Uncultivated Private
miscellaneous use
Cultivated area
Community Land
Land under Non

Agriculture Use
more than once
Gross Cropped
Net Sown Area
Net Area sown

land
Geographical
Land Under
Forest Area
Permanent
Pastures
Village
Area#
S.
Area
No Temporary Permanent Cultivated Cultivated
fallow Fallow Rainfed Irrigated
22 Kumraka D. Reserve 863 0 0 476 0 0 58 0 329 0 329 229 559

23 Kumrakat (F.V.) 919 0 0 345 0 0 70 0 504 0 504 368 871
24 Uttar Kumrakata No.1 40 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 16 34
25 Kachari Basti 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 0 88 4 92
26 Pub Kandulimari 212 0 0 29 0 12 0 0 171 0 171 34 205
27 Radhanagar No.1 313 0 0 123 0 22 51 0 118 0 118 59 177
28 Rajabari Grant 346 0 0 89 0 28 16 0 212 0 212 68 280
29 Saotal Basti 157 0 0 8 0 26 5 0 118 0 118 23 141
30 Thikadar Basti 221 0 0 6 0 7 0 0 208 0 208 13 221
TOTAL 9342 388 0 3087 0 512 431 0 4925 0 4925 2047 6972
31
Table No. 3.8: Details of Common Property Resources:
1 2 3 4
CPR Total Area (ha)
Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)
Govt. Govt.
(specify Any other (specify Any other
S.No Particulars Pvt. persons dept.) PRI (Pl. Specify) Pvt. persons deptt.) PRI (Pl. Specify)
1 Wasteland/ degraded land - 431 - - - 431 - -
2 Pastures - - - - - - - -
3 Orchards - - - - - - - -
4 Village Forest 120 - - - - - - -
5 Forest - 388 - - - - - -
6 Village Ponds/ Tanks 18 - - 12 - - - -
7 Community Buildings - - - 6 - - - -
8 Weekly Markets - - - 12 - - - -
9 Permanent markets 6 - - - - - - -
10 Temples/ Places of worship - - - 11 - - - -
11 Others (Pl. specify) - - - - - - - -
Total 144 819 0 41 0 431 0 0
Table No. 3.9: Agriculture implements: Table No. 3.10: Crop Classification
1 2 3
S. Implements Nos. 1 2 3
No S. No Crop classification Area (Hec)
1 Tractor 15 1 Single crop 4925
2 Sprayers-manual/ 52
2 Double crop -
power
3 Cultivators/Harrows 112 3 Multiple crop -
4 Seed drill -
32
Table No. 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern
1 2 3 4 5 6
S. Season Crop sown Rain fed Irrigated Total
N Area Productio Productivit Cost of Are Production( Productivit Cost of Area Productio Productivit Cost of
o (ha) n (Ton/yr) y (Kgs/ha) cultivatio a Ton/yr) y (Kgs/ha) cultivatio (ha) n (Ton/yr) y (Kgs/ha) cultivatio
n (Rs. /ha) (ha) n (Rs. /ha) n (Rs.
/ha)
1 Kharif Autumn Paddy 4568 6852 1500 9000 0 0 0 0 4568 6852 1500 9000
Rabi Winter Paddy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18000 0 0 0 18000
Mustard 24 18 750 3700 0 0 0 0 24 18 750 3700
2 Black gram 17 11 660 3400 0 0 0 0 17 11 660 3400
Lentil 11 5 450 3400 0 0 0 0 11 5 450 3400
Green gram 16 8 490 3400 0 0 0 0 16 8 490 3400
Vegetables 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18000 0 0 0 18000
3 Summer Summer Paddy 500 1200 2400 9000 0 0 0 0 500 1200 2400 9000
Total 5136 8094 6250 0 0 0 5136 8094 6250
33
Table No. 3.12: Land capability Classification
Based on Depth (cms)- Based on Slope (%) (mention area in Erosion
(mention area in ha) ha) (mention area in ha)
Total
Soil Moderate Land
S.No Land type Area V. Shallow Deep Very. Nearly Moderate Strong Water Wind
Texture* Deep Steep class
(ha) Shallow (7.5- (45.0- Deep Level slope (2- slope
(22.5- (>15) Sheet Rill Gully
(0.75) 22.5) 90.0) (>90) (0-2) 6) (6-15)
45.00)
Fine
1 I 2195 0 0 0 0 2195 2195 0 0 0
Loamy
Fine
2 II 2912 0 0 0 0 2912 0 2912 0 0
Loamy
Fine
3 III 269 0 0 0 0 269 0 0 269 0
Loamy
Fine
4 IV 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
Loamy
Fine
5 V 155 0 0 0 0 155 39 89 25 2
Loamy
Fine
6 VI 91 0 0 0 0 91 30 54 7 0
Loamy
Fine
7 VII 386 0 0 0 0 386 0 0 0 386
Loamy
Fine
8 VIII 3332 0 0 0 0 3332 1043 1907 376 6
Loamy
* Soil texture (sandy-clay, clayey, loamy-clay, gravel)
34
Table No.3.13: Irrigation facilities:
1 2 3 4
S.No Type of the Source Nos. Command area (in ha)
1 Ponds 53 -
2 Open wells 2 -
3 Bore wells -
4 Canal irrigation -
5 Natural spring head
Table No. 3.14: Status of water table
1 2 3 4 6 7 8
ground level (in

Depth of water
Source
table from
Source
S. Plot No of the Name of the Date of located at
mts)
(open Remarks
No source Owner* recording (ridge/middl
well)**
e/valley)
1 Shallow PU0000429343 Karna 6/4/2013 4.5 Valley Below Permissible

Tubewell Mazumdar Limit Fluoride[0.23
mg/l]
2 Openwell PU0000133180 Hari 30/7/2013 4.5 Valley Above Permissible
Chowhan Limit Iron[0.90
mg/l]
3 Shallow PU0001987303 Satish Das 27/07/2013 4.5 Valley Above Permissible
Tubewell Limit Iron[0.90
mg/l]
4 Shallow PU0001987316 Kiran 4.5 Valley Above Permissible
Tubewell Mandal Limit
Turbidity[25.00
30/07/2013 NTU]
5 Shallow PU0001658940 Kalinagar 6/4/2013 4.5 Valley Below Permissible
Tubewell LPS Limit Fluoride[0.84
mg/l]
6 Shallow SC2510740 Kunti Rabi 29/07/2013 4.5 Valley Above Permissible
Tubewell Das Limit Iron[1.06
mg/l]
Source: National Rural Drinking Water Programme,Govt. of India
35
Table No. 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility*:
1 2 3 4 5
S.No Item Units Quantity Source
1 Drinking water requirement Ltrs/day 155685 Tube Well, Govt
Supply, Ring Well
2 Present availability of drinking water Ltrs/day 124548
3 No. of drinking water sources available Nos 10250

a) Functional Nos 10250
b) Need Repairing Nos -
c) Defunct Nos -
4 Short fall if any Ltrs/day 31137
5 No. of families getting drinking water from Nos -
out side the Micro watershed area
6 Requirement of new drinking water Nos. 102
sources (if any)
* based on the observation from the field
Table No. 3.16: Surface water resources
1 2 3 4 5
S.No Type of water resource Nos Area irrigated Storage capacity (Cu.m)
(Ha)
1 Tank - -
2 Pond 53 - -
3 Lake - -
4 Check dam - -
5 Percolation tank - -
6 Channel/Canal - -
7 Any others (specify--------------) - -
Table No. 3.17 Ground Water Structures to be repaired

No. available
No. to be No. to be No. with no

S.No Type of structure Repaired rejuvenated interventions required Total
N.A.
Total
Table No. 3.18: Existing Water Saving Practices

Name of Area (Ha)
the
Major
Crop
Under water Under water Any other Total Current water Saving
saving conserving agronomic (Pl. Specify) status as against flood
devices$ practices# irrigation. (Cu.m)
N.A.
$: Sprinklers, Drip, PVC Pipe, etc.,

#: Vermi compost, organic manuring, check basin, alternate furrow, Ridges and furrow & specific practices
36
Table No. 3.19: Details of existing livelihoods
1 2 3 4
No. of beneficiaries Pre-project

average income
S. No. Name of activity SC ST Others Total Women per HH (Rs.)
1 Dairy 388 63 485 937 309 45000
2 Goatary 485 79 582 1146 378 30000
3 Duckery 194 32 194 420 139 25000
4 Poultry 582 111 1941 2634 869 25000

TOTAL 1648 285 3203 5137 1695
37
Table No.3.21 PROBLEM TYPOLOGY OF THE WATERSHED
1 2 3 4
S.No Problem area Problem analysis Proposed interventions to overcome problems
1 Soil Conservation 1. River Bank Erosion, 1. Construction of graded bund, field bund to
(slope, erosion, soil loss, 2. Soil Erosion, Siltation & high soil loss in upland area. protect the soil erosion and siltation problems.
3. Sheet erosion is combatively high in many places.
rainfall, productivity, etc) 2. Applying Bio-engineering (Vetiver Plantation) to
protect the river bank from erosion.
2 Water conservation 1. Degradation of Natural Resource like congestion of 1. Restoration of drainage channel by excavation
(Water budget, Ground natural drainage, degradation of wetland etc. and reclamation.
2. Lack of water storage facility cause scarcity of water
water norms, productivity) 2. Reclamation of natural water bodies (beels) by
during winter.
excavating and constructing periphery bund etc.
Increase water storage capacity.
3. Run-off originated from seasonal rain attains high
velocity due to medium to steep prevailed in the 3. Construction of Farm Pond for water
watershed and thereby causes all types of soil erosion harvesting/storage. Along with water distribution
channel for irrigation.
hazards.
4. Construction of Nullabund to check the water
4. Loss of productivity due to waterlogging stagnant/waterlogging problem.
3 Crop coverage – {80% of 1. Rabi crop area is very low because of lack of irrigation 1. Agro-forestry, fuel wood plantation
w/s area should be with facilities.
2. Turmeric & Banana Plantation
canopy}
2. Mono cropping
38
3. Inundation problem during summer (kharif)
4. Low vegetative cover
4 Agriculture productivity 1. Low agricultural productivity due to high flood during 1. Brick canal and water storage farm pond for
(crop wise compare with summer, lack of irrigation facility, erratic and uncertain irrigation for both Rabi & Kharif crop.
dist. average) rainfall, low cropping intensity, lack of location-specific
technologies to match the high ecological diversity of
rainfed area etc.
5 Livestock productivity 1. Scarcity of fodder during flood period. 1. Promotion of Marketing facilities through SHG
(Milk Yield, Meat yield,
2. Lack of secure shelter during flood period 2. Promotion of Dairy, Piggery, goatery, Duckery
Eggs, Wool Yield, Kidding and Poultry farming activities.
etc.) 3. Inadequate nutrition due to lack of grazing land.
4. Diseases which reduce the production potential of

livestock.
6 Existing Livelihood 1. Less income generating activities. 1. Promotion of Dairy, Piggery, goaery, Duckery
activities for Asset less and Poultry farming activities.
2. Their present occupation is Daily Labour, Rikswa
persons 2. Promotion of weaving activities for asset less
Pullers etc.
woman.
7 Community Based 1. Most of the SHG are not functional. 1. Formation of SHG, User groups for promotion
Organizations & Social of various income generating activities
capital base
8 Capacity Building 1. In many villages it is observed that the Participation in 1. Conducting Awareness programmes among the
(participation, training, Gram Sabha is very low due to lack of awareness
39
awareness of watershed towards watershed development activities. villagers.
community
2. Providing training in respect to each activities
proposed for watershed development as well as
livelihood generation.
9 Others (specify) 1. Lack of Marketing Facilities 1. Providing Market Promotion Centres along with
Low Cost go-down for storage of various
products.
40
CHAPTER – 4
Institutional Building and Project Management
Table No. 4.1 Details of SHGs & UGs newly formed under IWMP:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
No. of Others Bank linkage
No. of ST in No. of SC in in each No. of BPL in
Total no. of CBOs No. of members each category each category category each category
No. of Amount
With
SHGs (Rs)
Sl. Type of only With only With
No. Group Men Women both Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total
(i)
Landless
(ii) MF
(iii) SF
SHG (iv) LF
1 Total
(i)
Landless
(ii) MF
(iii) SF
2 UGs (iv) LF
Total
*Account no. of Watershed Committee, PIA.
41
4.2: Details of Watershed Committees (WC)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Date of No. of
Registration members
as a in WC
Society
(dd/mm/ Land- Any
yyyy) SC ST SF MF LF less UG SHG GP other Educl
Name of M/F qualifi- Function/s
WCs Designation Name Write “Yes” if applicable cation assigned#
President Upen Kr. Singha M YES IX
Secretary Ajit Das M YES YES H.S.S.L.C.
Member Mrinal Mazumdar M YES Bsc. IT
Member Narayan Das M YES YES VII
Borpukhuri Member Sarat Chaura M YES IX
NA 10 Assigned
MWS Member Abu Kasem M YES V
Member Ranjit Mandal M YES YES H.S.S.L.C.
Member Ramsankar Chauhan M YES YES YES H.S.S.L.C.
Member Silpi Paul F YES YES YES IX
Member Manju Bhuyan Devi F YES YES IX
President Md. Noor Uddin M YES B.A.
Secretary Mr. Satrajit Paul M YES IX
Member Mr. Prantush Roy M YES YES IX
Member Nirmal Biswas M YES YES YES IX
Radhanarag Member Chinmoy Choudhuri M YES IX
NA 10 Assigned
MWS Member Naraton Singha M YES IX
Member Juli Charang F YES YES IX
Member Suchitra Dev F YES YES IX
Member Pradip Sammadar M YES YES VI
Member Rahul Das M YES YES IX
Dighalbali President Jiten Singha

NA 10 M YES YES IX Assigned
MWS
Secretary Ramnath Chauhan M YES B.A.
42
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Date of No. of
as a in WC
Society
(dd/mm/ Land- Any
Member Anjan Barman M YES YES YES X
Member N. Kamaljit Singha M YES YES H.S.S.L.C.
Member Sukhdeb Singha M YES IX
Chand Govind
Member
Chauhan M YES YES IX
Member Radheshyam Chauhan M YES YES YES VIII
Member Santi Devi F YES YES IX
Member Usha Thousen F YES YES YES YES IX
Member Suraj Singha M YES B.A.
President Benarashi Chauhan M YES YES VII
Secretary Manik Inghi M YES YES YES IX
Md. Jamal Uddin
Member M
Ahmed YES IX
Member Kalimohan Das M YES YES YES IX
Hawaipur Member Rudra Bahadur Chetri M YES H.S.S.L.C.
NA 11 Member Rajani Inghipi F YES YES IX Assigned
MWS
Member Nangi Chauhan M YES YES YES VIII
Member Honsing Teron M YES YES IX
Member Tanka Prasad Sarma M YES YES B.A.
Member Sahela Devi F YES YES VIII
Member Abdul Salem M YES YES H.S.S.L.C.
President Monmohan Dalagapu M YES YES IX
Secretary Govinda Biswas M YES YES IX
Kumurakata
NA 11 Member Fulban Sangma M YES YES IX Assigned
MWS
Member Kenadao Barman M YES YES IX
Member Sanjay Kumar Kemprai M YES YES IX
43
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Date of No. of
as a in WC
Society
(dd/mm/ Land- Any
Member Sachindra Kemprai M YES YES IX
Member Dibyajyoti Hasam M YES YES IX
Member Lalmoni Chauhan M YES IX
Member Mahadeb Chauhan M YES IX
Member Renu Bala F YES YES YES IX
Member Ainadi Bodo F YES YES YES IX
44
Table No 4.3: WDT Particulars:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Description of professional
S.No Names of WDT members M/F# Age Qualification / Experience Role/ Function*
training
Soil Conservation Overseer
1 Sri Dilip Kr. Haloi (Departmental) M - P.U.(3 Years Diploma in Civil Engineering) WDT Leader
(SCO),Nagaon S.C. Division
Sri A.H. Khandakar Fishery Extn.
2 M - Agri B.Sc.
Officer ,Nagaon
Mrs. Nirmita Barman, J. E. O/O the
3 M - H.Sc. (B.V.and A.H.)
Asstt. Engineer(Agri.) Nagaon
Dr. Hafizur Rahman,Extension Officer H.S.L.C.(3 years diploma in Mechanical
4 M -
(Vety)Jugijan Engineering,Diploma in Auyo-CAD)
Table No. 4.4: PIA particulars

1 2 3
S.No Particulars Details of PIA
1. Type of organization# Govt. Department
2. Name of organization Department of Soil Conservation
3. Designation & Address Divisional Officer, Nagaon Soil Conservation Divison, Katimari, Nagaon, Assam
4. Telephone +91-94350-15629
5. Fax
6. E-mail jiten_malakar@rediffmail.com
Table No. 4.5 Bank Account Details

Name of WC/PIA Name of the Bank/Place Account No. Name of the Signatory Address
PIA Dimaru IWMP (Divisional Officer, - Jiten Malakar Nagaon Soil Conservation Divison,
Nagaon Soil Conservation Divison, Katimari, Nagaon, Assam)
Katimari, Nagaon, Assam)
PIA, Jugijan IWMP United Bank of India Nagaon 31013176438 Jiten Malakar Divisional Officer, Nagaon Soil
Branch Conservation Division
45
Institutional Mechanisms:
Fig. 11 Flow Chart of Institutional Arrangement from District to watershed level
National Level
Institutional
NLDC DoLR, Gol NRAA, GoI Arrangement
SLNA - ASSAM
Chairman C.E.O. RDD SS, Finance, PCC, Director

Soil, DoLR, NREGA, Water, Agril,
F&E, DoLR, NGO, Expert, PIA
State Level
Institutional
Arrangement
Admn. Officer F.O.
MIS
T.E. (W/M) T.E. (GIS.)
GIS
T.E. (GIS.) T.E. (Agr.)
SLDC
Ac. Astt./ Off. Astt, DEO
DWDU DDC
Project Manager Chairman WCDC T.E. (Agri, W/M, S/M, District Level
Mang., F.O Institutional
Arrangement
Off. Astt. Com. Opp.
PIA/PIU
WDT Project Level

WC Institutional
MEMBER Arrangement
NLDC SHG
National Level Data Centre DoLR UG Department of Land Resource
NRAA National Rainfed Area Authority SLNA State Level Nodal Agency
C.E.O Chief Executive Officer MIS Management Information System
GIS Geographical Information System SLDC State Level Data Cell
F.O. Financia l Officer T.E. Technical Expert
DEO Data Entry Operator DWDU District Water Development Unit
DDC District Data Cell WC Watershed Committee
PIA Project Implementation Agency PIU Project Implementation Unit
WDT Watershed Development Team SHG Self Help Group
WDTM Watershed Development Team Member UG User Group
4.6.2 Fund Flow mechanisms – flow chart,
46
DoLR, Gol Govt. of Assam
(90%) (10%)
STATE LEVEL NODAL

AGENCY, ASSAM
(100%)
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
DWDU AGENCY (PIA)
(TRAINING, OVERHEAD, EPA)
WATERSHED
COMMITTEE
4.6.3 List of Watershed Records to be maintained

A) AT WATERSHED COMMITTEE LEVEL
 Registration Certificate
 Bylaws
 Detail Project Report
 Annual Action Plan
 Cash Book
 Project Fund Passbook
 Watershed Development Fund Pass book
47
 Ledger Book
 Asset Register
 Vouchers
 Land Details
 Measurement Book
 Audit Report/ Social Audit Report
 Photo Documents
 Project Completion Report
 Common Guidelines
 MoU between Watershed Committee and Project Implementing Agency
 Revenue Records.
B) AT PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY LEVEL
 Cash Book
 Computerized Accounting System
 Vouchers
4.7 Documents of Agreements:

4.7.1) Watershed Committee Registration certificate - (under Process)
4.7.2 MoU – PIA – DWDU, PIA – WC - (under Process)
4.7.3 Resolution of Gram Sabha ,Aam Sabha, WC approving action plan#
#the resolution should be done village wise and needs to be approved in Gram/Aam
Sabha
48
4.8 Project Implementation
Project Implementation involves a number of activities. Among them, the major activities are- securing
community participation, co-ordination of activities and project management & Controlling, Monitoring.
Co-ordination is the process whereby more people or organizations work together to deal collectively
with a shared objective. The rationale for co-ordination shall be-
1. To take immediate corrective action for problems encountered in implementation of the project.
2. To promote better relationship among organizations, institution, departments and individuals
connected with the project and to harmonies resources and activities for the achievements of
the project objectives.
3. To establish cordial relationship between the target population of the project and all the other
section of the society.
4. Team building which include recruiting people with appropriate qualification for positions in the
organization, orienting new people to their position to help them learn about their
responsibilities and providing training when necessary to upgrade people’s skills.
Project Management & Controlling means managing activities to ensure progress towards the
project objectives.
1. Measuring progress of project by comparing the current situation with established goals and
objectives.
2. Submitting reports to account for project activities and finance
3. Monitoring performance to document the way people carry out their responsibilities.
4. Providing feedback to people on a regular, informal basis including positive feedback and
constructive criticism.
5. Adjusting plans to respond to changes in the internal and external organizational environment.
Monitoring is an important part of project implementation which is a process of routinely gathering

information on all aspects of the project. The monitoring shall be continuous and it should be in
place before start-up.
The first level monitoring shall be done by the project staff. The DWDU and PIA shall be
responsible for monitoring the staff and task under them and Project Manager shall be responsible
for monitoring all aspects of the project. The second level monitoring shall be done by third party.
49
The monitoring team shall be collected the report through field visit, progress and measures
performance including financial reporting.
Step for Monitoring Process:
 Defining the objectives of the monitoring system;
 Designing a programme to systematically monitor achievements;
 Selection of indicators/parameters to be monitored, the location, methods/processes and
frequency of observations and the information processing and reporting procedure are
important; and
 Organizing, motivating and training people to obtain, convey and use the information.
Monitoring Tools
 Semi-structured interviews;
 Community workshops to evaluate the extent of adoption and resulting achievements from
conservation practices.
 Observation and measurement of easily quantifiable field indicators.
 Farmers’ own records can be prepared which provides vital information to great details.
 Ground photographs taken from the same place depicting before and after remedial
measures, details concerning landscape CPR’s changes in the status of natural resources.
 Community evaluation of certain simple technical, ecological, economical, social and
essential services indicators.
 Remote sensing satellite imageries and aerial photographs taken at the start of the plan
are repeated periodically.
 Geographical Information Systems (GIS)
 Video monitoring.
 Comparison with demonstration and research plots/ farms.
 Comparison with demonstration and research micro-watersheds.
 Hydro-meteorological measuring.
 Using the information gathered by other institutional and private enterprises.
 Combination of above mentioned tools.
50
PIS Tasks Responsibility
Project Immediate corrective action for problem DWDU, Project Manager, WDT
encountered Member
Co-ordination
Create Relationship among staff and Project Manager
Institution
Team Building & Capacity Building DWDU/PIA/Project Manager
Co-operation and Network Development DWDU/PIA/Project Manager
Project Management & Progress of Project Project Manager

Controlling
Report generating to account project PIA/ Project Manager
activities and financial statement
Performance monitoring PIA/ Project Manager/DWDU
Monitoring 1st Level Monitoring DWDU/Project Manager/PIA

Staff Performance
Work Performance
Target achievement
2nd Level Monitoring DWDU/ Third Party

Work Quality
Deviation Report
Financial statement
51
Role & Responsibility of different Institution during Project Implementation
Prepare a perspective and strategic plan
Provide technical support to DWDU

SLNA
Ensure regular and quality on-line monitoring
Identify potential PIAs
Providing professional technical support to Project

Implementing
Carry out regular monitoring, evaluation and learning.

DWDU
Ensure smooth flow of funds to watershed development
projects.
Ensure timely submission of required documents to

SLNA / Nodal
Technical guidance to WC
Undertake community organization and training for the

village communities
PIA Supervise watershed development activities
Monitor and review the overall project implementation
Inspect and authenticate project accounts
Set up institutional arrangements for post-project

operation
52
CHAPTER – 5
Management/Action Plan
Description on methodology of plan adopted
a) Awareness generation interventions :

i. Awareness campaign through Gram Sabha in each villages of watershed area. Awareness
generation programme will be conducted for all project stakeholders at watershed level
with the basic purpose of educating them and creating more interest regarding various
aspects of the IWMP project.
ii. Awareness campaign through distribution of pamphlet and brochures describing about the
IWMP project.
b) Initial Orientation program: For successful completion of the project, orientation of both project
personnel and watershed communities according to the changing perspective is imperative and it
will enhance skills and competence of project staff to work with the villagers. Various training,
awareness programme and seminar shall be conducted to build necessary skills and competence
among the project officials, PRIs, especially GPs and other Communities Based Organizations
(CBOs) about planning, implementation and management of various project activities.
c) Formation process UGs & Watershed Committee : The User Group and Watershed Committee
are formed through Gram Sabha and awareness programme.
d) DPR preparation process:
In consideration of the objective & terms of reference of the programme , the Methodology adopted for
Preparing The DPR are-
53
A. Survey :
1. Socio-Economic Survey:
a) Collection of data to find out the strength, weakness, opportunity and threat of the
project area and assessment of local resources. It also includes collection of water
sample, soil sample and testing shall be done in laboratory to find out its problem &
prospects.
b) Total household enumeration – include collection of household data related to social as
well economic status of the member. It also include Land use, Agriculture including
area, productivity, cropping intensity, Horticulture, Livestock and Fisheries, Forests and
Grass land, Livelihood Status, Hydrology and Water Resources, Soil and Moisture
Conservation and Efficient use of Water.
2. Physiographic Survey:
a. A Physical survey has conducted using GPS/Total Station in the study area to identify
the location, distribution and availability of the local resources and to identify the
location, morphology and other physiographic conditions that proposed for any
intervention.
b. Collection of satellite imagery, toposheets, weather data, data related to natural
calamities like damage by flood, earthquake etc.
B. PRA:
After collection of baseline data of the study areas PRA has conducted among the villagers in
village level to find out the intervention which are proposed for implementation. The PRA The
process is expected to enhance identification of the felt needs of the people, bringing forth
consensus, the empowerment of local disadvantaged groups, integration of local knowledge
systems into project design, two‐way learning process between the project and local people,
political commitment and support, accountability in local governance. The PRA methodology
utilizes different tools to seek its goal of a participatory approach for addressing any issue. The
following tools were used by the research team in the exercise under consideration:
a. Resource mapping: Resource Mapping has done to identify valuable resource, Ensure
that everyone has access to the resources they need, avoid duplication of services and
resource, enhance service, Identify flexible funding strategies, use data to make informed
decision and cultivate new partnerships and relationship.
54
b. Social mapping: Social mapping is used to present information on village layout, social
infrastructure, demography, language-religion-culture groups, health, wealth, other, etc.
This provides an overview of the socio-economic aspects.
c. Focus Group Discussion: A focus group discussion (FGD) is a group discussion of
approximately 6 - 12 persons guided by a facilitator, during which group members talk
freely and spontaneously about a certain topic. A FGD is a qualitative method and its
purpose is to obtain in-depth information on concepts, perceptions and ideas of a group. A
FGD aims to be more than a question-answer interaction. The idea is that group members
discuss the topic among themselves, with guidance from the facilitator. A FGD also helps
to bring out the perceptions of the weaker stake-holders in an issue, which otherwise will
not come up.
d. Transect Walk: A transect walk is a walk taken by participants and facilitator through the
area of interest, observing, asking, listening, looking, identifying different zones, seeking
problems and possible solutions. The finding are documented and they can be mapped on
to a transect diagram or map. Transects are an ideal point of departure for a
research/planning process in a village, because we establish the villagers as the experts
on living condition of that area.
e. Seasonality: Seasonality analysis has done to identify seasonal resources. Water
availability in different sources at different times, cropping pattern is clearly recognized
through seasonality tool.
f. Trend line: In Trend-line, graphs are created for long-term changes over time based on
the local people’s accounts of the past, of how things close to them have changed -
ecological histories, land use and cropping patterns, customs and practices, trends in fuel
use, etc. Although secondary data may be available on these, a local perspective facilitates
the design of development initiatives.
g. Time line: Time line has helped us in identifying important past events. With this
information the team is better informed about the area, community, progress and the
problems. The team conducted semi-structured interviews to obtain oral histories of past
events. These oral histories can provide details on local events, how the community
perceived them, and the eventual impact of these events on the local area and the
community.
C. Analysis: Considering the objective of the study analysis has been done -
i. Analysis of Household data (Which shall include socio-economic data)
ii. Analysis of physical data (Weather Data, Soil, water quality, flood etc.)
55
iii. Analysis of data collected for proposed Intervention and its outcome etc.
D. Mapping: Mapping and analysis has done in GIS Platform using ARC GIS and the Satellite
Image interpretation shall be done by ERDAS Software. The data that collected for any intervention
has analyzed in GIS Platform using satellite imagery and Google Earth. The following Maps for the
study shall be prepared using GIS-
a. Location Map
b. Watershed Map
c. Relief Map
d. Drainage Map
e. Slope map
f. Soil Map
g. Land Use / Land cover map
h. Map showing Proposed Intervention in Different Phase
56
5.2 Details of Natural Resource Management Activities
Table No. 5.2.1 Soil and Moisture Conservation structures & Surface Water Treatment
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Plot
Numbers
( Area (in Ha)/
including Dimension ( Total GPS Points
Name of the Name of in M/ Sq. M / Total Grant Year of
Sl. Activities Name of the Hamlet / the local CuM) of Unit Cost (in Amount Implementation
No. (Structures) Village Patch) Structure Cost Rs.) Contribution (in Rs) (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th) Long Lat
1 Dakhin Bidya Nagar - 900 218 196200 19620 196200 4th Year 92°50'14.561"E 25°59'44.614"N
2 Matikhula - 285 218 62130 6213 62130 4th Year 92°48'34.088"E 26°0'35.524"N
3 Silguri - 120 218 26160 2616 26160 4th Year 92°49'43.916"E 26°1'0.183"N
4 Singari Basti - 1200 218 261600 26160 261600 4th Year 92°49'19.732"E 26°0'6.097"N
5 Uttar Bidya Nagar - 300 218 65400 6540 65400 4th Year 92°50'23.281"E 26°0'31.498"N
6 Uttar Matikhula - 2600 218 566800 56680 566800 4th Year 92°49'2.509"E 26°0'52.95"N
7 Amtola - 850 218 185300 18530 185300 4th Year 92°49'36.958"E 25°59'14.707"N
8 Bishnupur - 1700 218 370600 37060 370600 4th Year 92°48'10.422"E 25°58'47.756"N
9 Dighalbali - 3600 218 784800 78480 784800 4th Year 92°48'27.637"E 25°58'6.953"N
10 Maina Pathar - 2000 218 436000 43600 436000 4th Year 92°48'23.721"E 25°59'39.941"N
Graded Bund
11 Pachim Amtola - 1200 218 261600 26160 261600 4th Year 92°49'0.172"E 25°59'1.053"N
12 Pachim Nandalalpur - 900 218 196200 19620 196200 4th Year 92°50'51.829"E 25°59'13.279"N
13 Hawaipur - 850 218 185300 18530 185300 4th Year 92°49'53.807"E 25°57'51.562"N
14 Milik Basti - 2008 218 437744 43774.4 437744 4th Year 92°50'21.839"E 25°57'41.765"N
15 Dakshin Kumarkata No.1 - 900 218 196200 19620 196200 4th Year 92°47'53.197"E 25°59'33.095"N
16 Kumraka D. Reserve - 1290 218 281220 28122 281220 4th Year 92°47'30.065"E 26°0'44.886"N
17 Kachari Basti - 400 218 87200 8720 87200 4th Year 92°49'42.551"E 26°2'15.407"N
18 Radha Nagar No.1 - 1000 218 218000 21800 218000 4th Year 92°48'10.534"E 26°1'51.474"N
19 Rajabari Grant - 1700 218 370600 37060 370600 4th Year 92°47'22.781"E 26°2'21.27"N
20 Thikadar Basti - 900 218 196200 19620 196200 4th Year 92°49'33.803"E 26°1'48.935"N
57
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Plot Area (in Ha)/ Total
Name of the Numbers Dimension ( Total Grant Year of
Sl. Activities Name of the Hamlet / ( in M/ Sq. M / Unit Cost (in Amount Implementation
No. (Structures) Village including CuM) of Cost Rs.) Contribution (in Rs) (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th) GPS Points
Name of Structure
TOTAL 7955 1734190 173419 1734190
1 Dighalabari - 585 218 127530 12753 127530 3rd Year 92°49'9.707"E 25°57'39.58"N
2 Maina Pathar - 4200 218 915600 91560 915600 3rd Year 92°48'27.128"E 25°59'45.196"N
3 Pachim Amtola - 7766 218 1692988 169298.8 1692988 3rd Year 92°49'30.458"E 25°58'23.288"N
4 Hawaipur - 441 218 96138 9613.8 96138 3rd Year 92°49'52.086"E 25°57'36.943"N
Periphery Bund
5 Hawaipur RF - 522 218 113796 11379.6 113796 3rd Year 92°49'20.292"E 25°55'41.314"N
6 Milik Basti - 5187 218 1130766 113076.6 1130766 2nd Year 92°50'37.43"E 25°57'39.682"N
7 Kumraka D. Reserve - 4795 218 1045310 104531 1045310 3rd Year 92°46'36.387"E 25°59'13.451"N
8 Kumrakat (F.V.) - 2627 218 572686 57268.6 572686 3rd Year 92°47'9.217"E 25°58'11.001"N
TOTAL 26123 5694814 569481.4 5694814
58
Table No. 5.2.2 Water Harvesting Structures
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Plot Area (in GPS Points
Noumbe Ha)/
rs ( Dimensi Year of
Sl. Name of the Total Grant
Name of the includin on ( in Unit Total Cost Contributio Implementation
No Activities Amount (in
Hamlet / Village g Name M/ Sq. M Cost (in Rs.) n (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/ Long Lat
. (Structures) Rs)
of the / CuM) of 5th)
local Structur
Patch) e
Dighalabari - 6549 346 2265954 226595.4 2265954 3rd Year 92°48'38.238"E 25°57'10.889"N
Pachim Amtola - 7900 346 2733400 273340 2733400 3rd Year 92°49'26.099"E 25°58'32.177"N
Hawaipur - 2855 346 987830 98783 987830 5th Year 92°49'30.69"E 25°57'10.104"N
Reclamation of Hawaipur RF - 5154 346 1783284 178328.4 1783284 3rd Year 92°48'41.444"E 25°57'7.869"N
1
Marshy Land
Milik Basti - 8415 346 2911590 291159 2911590 2nd Year 92°50'33.429"E 25°58'5.084"N
Kumraka D.
Reserve - 8601 346 2975946 297594.6 2975946 3rd Year 92°46'57.12"E 25°59'0.751"N
Kumrakat (F.V.) - 8768 346 3033728 303372.8 3033728 5th Year 92°47'0.92"E 25°58'41.1"N
Sub Total 48242 16691732 1669173.2 16691732
Maina Pathar - 2100 355 745500 74550 745500 3rd Year 92°48'34.932"E 25°59'36.801"N
Pachim Amtola - 3000 355 1065000 106500 1065000 3rd Year 92°49'10.531"E 25°59'7.739"N
Reclamation of Milik Basti - 800 355 284000 28400 284000 3rd Year 92°50'16.692"E 25°58'11.87"N
3 Dakhin
Drainage Channel
Kumrakata No 1 - 500 355 177500 17750 177500 3rd Year 92°48'0.605"E 25°59'53.387"N
Kumraka D.
Reserve - 1600 355 568000 56800 568000 3rd Year 92°47'4.461"E 26°0'5.151"N
Sub Total 8000 2840000 284000 2840000
Bor Pukhuri - 1 96000 96000 9600 96000 3rd Year 92°50'31.515"E 26°1'15.904"N
Silguri - 2 96000 192000 19200 192000 3rd Year 92°49'36.701"E 26°1'1.807"N
Bishnupur - 1 96000 96000 9600 96000 3rd Year 92°48'17.964"E 25°58'50.226"N
4 Farm Pond Pachim Amtola - 1 96000 96000 9600 96000 4th Year 92°48'59.065"E 25°58'44.61"N
Pachim
Nandalalpur - 2 96000 192000 19200 192000 4th Year 92°50'46.596"E 25°58'59.174"N
Kachari Basti - 2 96000 192000 19200 192000 4th Year 92°49'46.641"E 26°2'16.685"N
59
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Plot Area (in GPS Points
Noumbe Ha)/
rs ( Dimensi Year of
Sl. Name of the Total Grant
Name of the includin on ( in Unit Total Cost Contributio Implementation
No Activities Amount (in
Hamlet / Village g Name M/ Sq. M Cost (in Rs.) n (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/ Long Lat
. (Structures) Rs)
of the / CuM) of 5th)
local Structur
Patch) e
Pub Kandulimari - 3 96000 288000 28800 288000 2nd Year 92°48'38.171"E 26°2'45.925"N
RadhanagarNo. 1 - 2 96000 192000 19200 192000 4th Year 92°48'19.21"E 26°1'42.109"N
Rajabari Grant - 2 96000 192000 19200 192000 4th Year 92°47'14.873"E 26°2'23.54"N
Sautal Bsti - 1 96000 96000 9600 96000 4th Year 92°48'54.809"E 26°1'41.843"N
Thikadar Basti - 2 96000 192000 19200 192000 4th Year 92°49'17.105"E 26°1'54.472"N
Sub Total 19 1824000 182400 1824000
Singari Basti - 1 92000 92000 9200 92000 4th Year 92°49'32.364"E 25°59'41.428"N
Uttar Matikhula - 1 92000 92000 9200 92000 4th Year 92°49'21.135"E 26°0'31.313"N
Maina Pathar - 2 92000 184000 18400 184000 3rd Year 92°48'36.081"E 25°59'12.627"N
RCC Culvert Pachim Amtola - 1 92000 92000 9200 92000 2nd Year 92°49'34.726"E 25°58'12.218"N
5 Hawaipur - 2 92000 184000 18400 184000 4th Year 92°49'33.79"E 25°56'10.745"N
(Sluice Type)
Milik Basti - 4 92000 368000 36800 368000 2nd Year 92°50'29.942"E 25°58'2.2"N
Kumraka D.
Reserve - 1 92000 92000 9200 92000 3rd Year 92°46'15.675"E 25°58'5.388"N
Kumrakat (F.V.) - 1 92000 92000 9200 92000 4th Year 92°47'45.388"E 25°58'40.301"N
Sub Total 13 1196000 119600 1196000
60
Table No. 5.2.2 Vegetative Covers
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13
Plot
Numbers
(
including Total
Name of Area Total Grant Year of
Sl. Name of the Name of the the local Name of (in Unit Cost (in Amount Implementation GPS Points
No. Activities Hamlet / Village Patch) Beneficiaries Sqm) Cost Rs.) Contribution (in Rs) (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th) Long Lat
1 Bio- Dighalabari - - 5950 150 892500 89250 892500 5th Year 92°48'18.336"E 25°58'11.112"N
Engineering
Measures
2 (Vetiver Kumrakat (F.V.) - - 6270 150 940500 94050 940500 5th Year 92°47'3.021"E 25°58'32.679"N
Plantation)
TOTAL 12220 1833000 183300 1833000
5.3: Structure or Activity Wise Details of Engineering Structure and Vegetative Measures
Table No.5.3.1 : Engineering structures for Soil Conservation Measures (SMC)
1 2 3 4
Area (ha) Farmers Total units (No./ cu.m./ rmt) UNIT COST (Rs) Proposed plan Estimated cost* (Rs. in lakh) Farmers contribution Grant Portion
S. No. Name of structures M W O T (Rs. in lakh) (Rs. in lakh)
A PRIVATE LAND
1 Graded Bund 255 502 24703 218 5.39 45.77 2.69 53.85 5.39 48.47
Grand total (A+B) 255 502 24703 218 5.39 45.77 2.69 53.85 5.39 48.47
(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)
61
5.3.2: Details of engineering structures for Water Harvesting WHS
1 2 3 4
Proposed plan
UNIT COST Farmers
Estimated cost* contribution
Total units
(Rs) (Rs. in lakh) (Rs)
(No./ cu.m./
S. No. Name of structures rmt) M W O T
A2 Common structures
I. RCC Culvert (Sluice Type) 13 92000 7.18 4.19 0.60 11.96 119600
II. Farmponds 19 96000 1.82 15.50 0.91 18.24 182400
III. Reclamation of Marshy Land 48242.84 346 16.69 141.88 8.35 166.92 1669202
IV. Reclamation of Drainage Channel 8000 355 2.84 24.14 1.42 28.40 284000
Grand total 28.53 185.71 11.28 225.52 2255202
62
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11
Component Activities Unit Unit 1 year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th Year Total
Cost
(Rs.) Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin (Rs.) Phy Fin (Rs.) Phy Fin (Rs.) Phy Fin (Rs.) Phy Fin (Rs.)
(No) (Rs.) (No) (Rs.) (No) (No) (No) (No) (No)
Administration
WC office 6000 5 30000 5 30000 5 30000 5 30000 5 30000 5 30000 30 180000
a expenditure Rs.
WS secretary 18000 5 90000 5 90000 5 90000 5 90000 5 90000 5 90000 30 540000
b Salary Rs
Stationary & 540000 540000 1200000 1200000 1200000 1200000 5880000
c miscillaneous Rs.
Sub Total Admin 24000 10 660000 10 660000 10 1320000 10 1320000 10 1320000 10 1320000 60 6600000
Table No. 7.2 Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio

S.No. Name of the activity Total Cost (Rs.) Total Benefit expected * (Rs.) BCR Remarks
1 EPA 2640000 2904000 1.1
2 NRM 36961416 53963667 1.46
3 Prpductivity Enhancement 6194060 10529902 1.7
4 Livelihood for Asset less 5925000 10665000 1.8
5 Institution and Capacity building 3300000 3960000 1.2
6 Overall 55020476 82022569 1.49
72
Table No. 8.1: Consolidation of Action Plan
Component Allocation in % by Year Total in %
Phase -I: Preparatory Phase- II: Work Phae - III: Consolidation
1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year
Administrative 6.60 6.60 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.20 66.00
Monitoring 0.00 3.30 0.00 1.65 0.00 1.65 6.60
Evaluation 0.00 3.30 0.00 1.65 0.00 1.65 6.60
Entry Point Acty 26.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.40
Instituation&CB 3.30 13.20 6.60 6.60 3.30 0.00 33.00
DPR 3.30 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.60
Watershed Development works 0.00 49.50 138.60 69.30 112.20 0.00 369.60
livelihood activities (Asset less) 0.00 6.60 19.80 19.80 13.20 0.00 59.40
Production system & microenterprise 0.00 6.60 19.80 19.80 19.80 0.00 66.00
Consolidation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.80 19.80
TOTAL 39.60 92.40 198.00 132.00 36.30 660.00
73
Table No. 9.2: Summarize in the table given below (Quantifiable indicators)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Expected
Pre- Post-
Unit of project project
S. No. Item measurement Status Status Remarks
1 Status of water table (Depth to Meters
Ground water level)
2 Ground water structures No.
repaired/ rejuvenated
3 Quality of drinking water Description
4 Availability of drinking water Description
5 Increase in irrigation potential Hec.
6 Change in cropping/ land use Description
pattern
7 Area under agricultural crop Hec.
I Area under single crop Hec.
Ii Area under double Hec.

crop
iii Area under multiple Hec.
crop
8 Net increase in crop production Hec.
area
9 Increase in area under Hec.
Vegetation/Forest
10 Increase in area under Hec.
horticulture
11 Increase in area under fuel Hec.
12 Increase in area under Fodder Hec.
13 Increase in milk production Litres/day
14 Environmental Impact
Change in Soil Loss
Perenniality of flow and change
in Run-off
Recharge of ground water
14 No. of SHGs Promoted No.
15 Increase in no. of livelihoods No.
16 Increase in income Rs.
17 Status of Migration No.
18 SHG Federations formed No.
19 Credit linkage with banks Rs.
20 Resource use agreements
21 WDF collection & management Rs.
22 Summary of lessons learnt Description
74
Table No.9.3: Backward and Forward Linkages
Type of Marketing Facility Name of the institution Pre-project (no.) Expected post project
status
(A) Backward
linkages
(i) Seed certification Govt. of Assam No Will be done
(ii) Seed supply system Co-operative and No Strong Seed supply
Agriculture Dept. system will be developed
(iii) Fertilizer supply system Co-operative and local No Strong Fertilizer supply
fertilizer dealer system will be developed
(iv) Pesticide supply Local Pesticide Dealer No Strong Pesticide supply
system system will be developed
(v) Credit institutions Co-operative Bank, SHG, SHG Internal Credit link will be
Local Bank, Nodal Bank developed among SHG,
etc. Local Bank, Co-operative
Bank etc. and external
credit link from commercial
/ nodal banks.
(vi) Water supply Water User Group No Will be developed
(vii) Extension services KVK, ATMA, Agriculture ATMA, Agri Dept., NGO Strong extension services
Dept., NGOs will be developed among
all institutions
(viii) Nurseries SHG, Horticulture Local Nursery Strong extension services
Nursery, Local Nursery will be developed among
all institutions
(ix) Tools/machinery Ag Deptt Ag Deptt Will Continued
suppliers
(x) Price Support system Ag Deptt, Vetty Dept. Ag Deptt Will Continued
(xi) Labour Local wage labour Local wage labour Strong network will be
developed
(B) Forward linkages Strong network will be
developed
(i) Harvesting/threshing Local level Local level Strong network will be
machinery developed
(ii) Storage (including cold Local level Local level Strong network will be
storage) developed
(iii) Road network Local level Local level Strong network develop
(iv) Transport facilities Local level Local level Strong network develop
(v) Markets / Mandis Local committee, No Institution will take initiative
Cooperative so that beneficiearies will
get better opportunities.
(vi) Agro and other Local committee, No Institution will take initiative
Industries Cooperative so that beneficiearies will
(vii) Milk and other Local committee, No Institution will take initiative
collection centres Cooperative so that beneficiearies will
75
Village Wise Interventions (Natural Resourse Management)
Name of Micro Watershed Borpukhuri MWS

Name of Village Borpukhuri
Activities Related to Surface Water Treatment (Rs. In Lakh) (Rs. In Lakh)
Name of Intervention Unit Rate (in INR) TOTAL 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year
Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin
Pond NO 96000 1 0.96 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.96 0 0.00 0 0.00
Name of Village Dakhin Bidya Nagar
Graded Bund RM 218 900 1.96 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 900 1.96 0 0.00
Name of Village Hojai Town No-1
Name of Village Matikhola
Graded Bund RM 218 285 0.62 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 285 0.62 0 0.00
Earthen Channel RM 355 1000 3.55 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1000 3.55
76
Name of Village Rampur
Name of Village Silguri
Pond NO 96000 2 1.92 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 1.92 0 0.00
Graded Bund RM 218 120 0.26 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 120 0.26 0 0.00
Name of Village Singari Basti
Graded Bund RM 218 1200 2.62 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1200 2.62 0 0.00
RCC Culvert (Sluice Type) No 92000 1 0.92 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.92 0 0.00
Name of Village Uttar Bidya Nagar
Graded Bund RM 218 300 0.65 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 300 0.65 0 0.00
Name of Village Uttar Matikhola
Graded Bund RM 218 2600 5.67 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2600 5.67 0 0.00
Name of Micro Watershed Dighalbali MWS
Name of Village Amtola
77
Graded Bund RM 218 850 1.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 850 1.85 0 0.00
Name of Village Bishnupur
Pond NO 96000 1 0.96 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.96 0 0.00
Graded Bund RM 218 1700 3.71 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1700 3.71 0 0.00
Name of Village Dighalbali
Reclamation of Marshy Land CUM 346 6549 22.66 0 0.00 0 0.00 6549 22.66 0 0.00 0 0.00
Graded Bund RM 218 3600 7.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 3600 7.85 0 0.00
Periphery Bund RM 218 585 1.28 0 0.00 0 0.00 585 1.28 0 0.00 0 0.00
Bio engineering (Vetiver Plantation) SQM 150 5950 8.93 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 5950 8.93
Name of Village Maina Pathar
Reclamation Drainage Channel RM 355 2100 7.46 0 0.00 0 0.00 2100 7.46 0 0.00 0 0.00
Graded Bund RM 218 2000 4.36 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2000 4.36 0 0.00
Name of Village Pachim Amtola
Pond NO 96000 1 0.96 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.96 0 0.00
Graded Bund RM 218 1200 2.62 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1200 2.62 0 0.00
78
Name of Village Pachim Nandapur
Pond NO 96000 2 1.92 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 1.92 0 0.00
Graded Bund RM 218 900 1.96 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 900 1.96 0 0.00
Name of Micro Watershed Hawaipur MWS
Name of Village Hawaipur
Graded Bund RM 218 850 1.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 850 1.85 0 0.00
Name of Village Hawaipur R.F.
Name of Village Milik Basti
Graded Bund RM 218 2008 4.38 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2008 4.38 0 0.00
79
Name of Micro Watershed Kumrakata MWS
Name of Village Dakhin Kumrakata No 1
Graded Bund RM 218 900 1.96 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 900 1.96 0 0.00
Name of Village Kumraka D. Reserve
Graded Bund RM 218 1290 2.81 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1290 2.81 0 0.00
Name of Village Kumrakat (F.V.)
Bio engineering (Vetiver Plantation) SQM 150 6270 9.41 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 6270 9.41
Name of Village Uttar Kumrakata No.1
Name of Micro Watershed Radhanagar MWS
Name of Village Kachari Basti
80
Earthen Drainage Channel RM 355 1500 5.33 0 0.00 0 0.00 1500 5.33 0 0.00 0 0.00
Name of Village Pub Kandulimari
Pond NO 96000 3 2.88 0 0.00 2 1.92 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.96
Name of Village Radhanagar No.1
Graded Bund RM 218 1000 2.18 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1000 2.18 0 0.00
Name of Village Rajabari Grant
Pond NO 96000 2 1.92 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 1.92 0 0.00
Graded Bund RM 218 1700 3.71 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1700 3.71 0 0.00
Name of Village Saotal Basti
Graded Bund RM 218 440 0.96 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 440 0.96 0 0.00
Name of Village Thikadar Basti
Graded Bund RM 218 1500 3.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1500 3.27 0 0.00
81
Village Wise Interventions (Production System)
Name of Micro Watershed Borpukhuri MWS (Rs. In Lakh)

Poultry (Commercial Broiler Unit) No. 114500 1 1.15 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.15
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
82
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
Name of Micro Watershed Dighalbali MWS (Rs. In Lakh)
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
83
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00
Semi-Intensive pisciculture Hec 314000 1 3.14 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 3.14 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00
Name of Village Pachim Nandalalpur
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00
84
Name of Micro Watershed Hawaipur MWS (Rs. In Lakh)
Semi-Intensive pisciculture Hec 314000 1.15 3.61 0 0.00 1.15 3.61 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35
Name of Micro Watershed Kumrakata MWS (Rs. In Lakh)
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00
85
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
Name of Micro Watershed Radhanagar MWS (Rs. In Lakh)
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
Dairy NO 135000 1 1.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.35
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
86
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
Goatery No. 148764 1 1.49 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 1.49 0 0.00
87
Village Wise Interventions (Livelihood for Assetless Persons)

Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Name of Village Dakhin Bidya Nagar
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Weaving Centre NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
88
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
89
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
90
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
91
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Name of Village Pachim Nandapur
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
92
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
93
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.50
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
94
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 0 0.00 1 0.25
95
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Dairy NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Goatery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Piggery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25
Duckery NO 25000 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.25 1 0.25 0 0.00
Table No. 8.1: Consolidation of Action Plan

Component Allocation in % by Year Total in %
Phase -I: Preparatory Phase- II: Work Phae - III: Consolidation
1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year
Administrative 6.60 6.60 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.20 66.00
Monitoring 0.00 3.30 0.00 1.65 0.00 1.65 6.60
Evaluation 0.00 3.30 0.00 1.65 0.00 1.65 6.60
Entry Point Acty 26.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.40
Instituation&CB 3.30 13.20 6.60 6.60 3.30 0.00 33.00
DPR 3.30 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.60
Watershed Development works 0.00 49.50 138.60 69.30 112.20 0.00 369.60
livelihood activities (Asset less) 0.00 6.60 19.80 19.80 13.20 0.00 59.40
Production system & microenterprise 0.00 6.60 19.80 19.80 19.80 0.00 66.00
Consolidation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.80 19.80
TOTAL 39.60 92.40 198.00 132.00 36.30 660.00
96
Table No.9.3: Backward and Forward Linkages
Type of Marketing Facility Name of the institution Pre-project (no.) Expected post project status
(A) Backward linkages

(i) Seed certification Govt. of Assam No Will be done
(ii) Seed supply system Co-operative and Agriculture Dept. No Strong Seed supply system will be
developed
(iii) Fertilizer supply system Co-operative and local fertilizer No Strong Fertilizer supply system will be
dealer developed
(iv) Pesticide supply system Local Pesticide Dealer No Strong Pesticide supply system will be
developed
(v) Credit institutions Co-operative Bank, SHG, Local Bank, SHG Internal Credit link will be developed
Nodal Bank etc. among SHG, Local Bank, Co-operative
Bank etc. and external credit link from
commercial / nodal banks.
(vi) Water supply Water User Group No Will be developed
(vii) Extension services KVK, ATMA, Agriculture Dept., NGOs ATMA, Agri Dept., NGO Strong extension services will be
developed among all institutions
(viii) Nurseries SHG, Horticulture Nursery, Local Local Nursery Strong extension services will be
Nursery developed among all institutions
(ix) Tools/machinery suppliers Ag Deptt Ag Deptt Will Continued

(x) Price Support system Ag Deptt, Vetty Dept. Ag Deptt Will Continued
(xi) Labour Local wage labour Local wage labour Strong network will be developed
(B) Forward linkages Strong network will be developed
97
Type of Marketing Facility Name of the institution Pre-project (no.) Expected post project status
(i) Harvesting/threshing machinery Local level Local level Strong network will be developed
(ii) Storage (including cold storage) Local level Local level Strong network will be developed
(iii) Road network Local level Local level Strong network develop
(iv) Transport facilities Local level Local level Strong network develop
(v) Markets / Mandis Local committee, Cooperative No Institution will take initiative so that
beneficiearies will get better
opportunities.
(vi) Agro and other Industries Local committee, Cooperative No Institution will take initiative so that
opportunities.
(vii) Milk and other collection centres Local committee, Cooperative No Institution will take initiative so that
opportunities.
98

Nagaon-IX-2011-12 - Jugijan Iwmp PDF

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Nagaon-IX-2011-12 - Jugijan Iwmp PDF

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF IWMP

Micro Watershed & Micro : Borpukhuri MWS (3B2A1Ca)

CHAPTER 2 General Description of Project Area

CHAPTER – 3 Base Line Information of Watershed

CHAPTER – 4 Institutional Building and Project Management

CHAPTER – 5 Management/Action Plan

CHAPTER 6 Capacity Building Plan

CHAPTER 7 Phasing of Programme and Budgeting

CHAPTER 8 Consolidation and Completion of Various Works

CHAPTER – 9 Expected Outcomes

6 MWS Name Census Code Block Name GP Name

Need and Scope for Watershed Development

Watershed management is the implementation of management systems that ensure the

Table No. 1.2 Need and Scope for Watershed Development

NAGAON-9 (JUGIJAN IWMP) Plain 7.5 5 0 5 5 - 10 5 15 15 10 5

*As per PPR

Sl Name of Geographical Treatable Approval

General Description of Project Area

Table 2.1: Location

Rainfall Data of Nagaon District for Last 5 Years (2006-2010)

Variation in Rainfall : (from January to June)

Source: India Meteorological Department, HYDROMET DIVISION.

Source: India Meteorological Department, HYDROMET DIVISION.

Annual Rainfall for Last Seven Years (in mm)

(Graph shown Departure of rainfall of Nagaon District since 2006 to 2010)

Drainage & Water bodies:

Characteristics of Dominant Soil:

Particulars Fine Silty, Typic Coarse-loamy, Aeric Coarse-Silty, Mollic

Land Use/ Land Cover:

Geographical Land under Wasteland

1 Borpukhuri 1038 158 31 215 1442

Name of the Villages Soil Ph Soil Type

Maximum - 81 mtr., Maximum Slope - Fine Loamy (Typic Haplaquepts)

Table No. 2.9 Watershed characteristics

4 Total Milk production from milch animals (ltrs/day) 250

6 Fuel wood Availability (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Scarce

4 No. of Milk collection centers -

( Union/ Society/ Pvt.

6 Bus facility (Yes/No) Yes

Land under Non

more than once

Net Area sown

1 Borpukhuri 223 0 0 34 0 16 0 0 173 0 173 10 183

Land under Non

more than once

Net Area sown

22 Kumraka D. Reserve 863 0 0 476 0 0 58 0 329 0 329 229 559

* Soil texture (sandy-clay, clayey, loamy-clay, gravel)

Table No. 3.14: Status of water table

ground level (in

1 Shallow PU0000429343 Karna 6/4/2013 4.5 Valley Below Permissible

3 No. of drinking water sources available Nos 10250

Table No. 3.17 Ground Water Structures to be repaired

No. to be No. to be No. with no

Table No. 3.18: Existing Water Saving Practices

$: Sprinklers, Drip, PVC Pipe, etc.,

No. of beneficiaries Pre-project

4 Poultry 582 111 1941 2634 869 25000

4. Low vegetative cover

4. Diseases which reduce the production potential of

Dighalbali President Jiten Singha

Table No. 4.4: PIA particulars