Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
English 2010
¨Donald J. Trump, Pope Francis, and the Beef That Defied Space and Time¨
Benjamin Soloman
January 15, 2019
1. ¨Notice how the Pope made himself sound more credible by quoting an ancient Greek
philosopher, while also asserting that he’s basically just human, making him sound more
humble at the same time¨
¨If a student turned in a sentence like this to me, I’d comment, “I’m not sure this makes
logical sense.” I’d consider it first-drafty, undercooked, and expect the writer to work on
clarifying its structure and logic. So it’s tempting for me to call Donald Trump a sloppy
grammarian, or a logical fallacy on legs. But actually, I think Trump’s use of language was both
calculated and intentional¨
2. The two side in the article are clearly butting heads, trying to make their own side seem
the more righteous of the opposed. It's interesting to see how each of the two sides uses there
language to make a point, both use different methods. The Pope uses more credible sounding
language and Trump used a jumbled loop of information, yet it gets his point across.
“Writing Is Recursive”
Chris Blankenship
January 30, 2019
1. “But if you’re willing to put aside the linear steps and view invention, research, drafting,
revision, and editing as ways of thinking that can be revisited over and over again until you
accomplish your goal, you will become a more successful writer.”
“recursion is used to describe a process that loops or “runs again” until a task is complete.”
2. Writing isn’t necessarily a linear process because one thing changed at the end of an
essay of piece of writing can impact the beginning. It’s a sporadic process where change and
revision happens in multiple areas that involves all the elements. You may have to start from
the beginning and go through the process again if you change something, or jump into a part in
the middle of the linear process. That is why a web is more accurate.
“Dear Italy”, “An Open Letter to High School Students About Reading”
February 5, 2019
1. “I simply found a place in you, where I felt as though I belonged.”
“Obviously, however, with minimal effort comes minimal rewards.”
2. Some commonalities between the two letters are along the lines of evidence. Both of
their evidences support their idea they are expressing. Their structure is also very similar. It
moves from point to point explaining the main idea.
“Memorability”
Nikki Mantyla
February 25, 2019
Simple: “He took a direct approach. And he kept it concise.”
Unexpected: “Juxtaposition, in which you compare things that seem unrelated, can be a great
tool for creating irony.”
Concrete: “...showing with concrete details means readers experience firsthand input and draw
their own stronger conclusions.”
Credible: “One way is to borrow fame, as this article does by showcasing a celebrity. Take
advantage of any impressive sources.”
Emotional: “Aim for the kind of vibe that best fits the audience and purpose, and find effective
ways to solicit those emotions.”
Story-based: “Most crucially of all, tell a story. It’s one of the best ways to appeal to emotion—
and appeal to humans.”
Conclusion: “That’s the power of language to do things, be things, and make things in the
world.”
“Story as Rhetorical: We Can’t Escape the Story No Matter How Hard We Try”
Ron Christiansen
February 28, 2019
1. “Did you know that writing teachers disagree about what kinds of writing they should use
or teach, even if they (sometimes? often?) act as if there is a consensus?”
“Unfortunately, rigor is often defined, unknowingly at times, as that which students simply do not
like…”
“...story is not simply rhetorical because writers make decisions about it.”
2. Story is an argument because it often is concerning someone’s experience. Those help
from opinions which eventually leads to an underlying argument, regardless of if it is on purpose
or not.
¨Peer Review¨
Jim Beatty
March 8, 2019
¨The least helpful thing you can do when peer reviewing is correct grammar and typos.¨
It would be much more beneficial to suggest ideas in order to make their paper stronger rather
than make it more correct. It is more important to have meaningful, well communicated content
than correct style. Punctuation and grammar can be fixed at any time and I feel they should be
done last. I would prefer someone to help me develop my ideas instead of telling me I´m wrong.
¨The best writing comes out of communal effort.¨
I feel like some of my best pieces of writing were analysed by other people. For example, I
wrote a letter to Westminster when I was submitting my application. It was decent before I had
my parents look it over. My parents offered a lot of feedback which made my overall paper
much better than if it had just me judging myself. Writing really well requires perspective from
someone who isn't.