Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Investments in human capital are central to development, delivering substantial economic benefits in the long term. However,
these investments often take time to materialize and their benefits to society are not always visible, leading to underinvestmen
capital.
The World Bank has launched a Human Capital Project (HCP) — a program of advocacy, measurement, and analytical work to r
and increase demand for interventions to build human capital. The HCP has three components: (i) a cross-country metric—the
Index (HCI), (ii) a program of measurement and research to inform policy action, and (iii) a program of support for country strat
accelerate investment in human capital.
This Excel document features the first component of the HCP: the Human Capital Index. It provides data at the country level fo
components of the Human Capital Index as well as for the overall index. The "Methodology" tab describes in more detail the d
components of the index and its unit of measurement.
For more information on the Human Capital Project, please visit www.worldbank.org/humancapitalproject.
wever, the benefits of
stment in human
rk to raise awareness
—the Human Capital
y strategies to
The Human Capital Project (HCP) includes an international metric to benchmark the key components of human capital ac
of human capital that a child born today can expect to attain by age 18, given the risks of poor health and poor education
highlight how improvements in current health and education outcomes shape the productivity of the next generation of w
18 years the educational opportunities and health risks that children in this age range currently face.
The HCI measures key points along the trajectory from birth to adulthood of a child born today. In the poorest countries i
survive to her fifth birthday. Even if she does reach school age, there is a further risk that she does not start school, let alo
Grade 12 that is the norm in rich countries. The time she does spend in school may translate unevenly into learning, depe
she reaches age 18, she carries with her lasting effects of poor health and nutrition in childhood that limit her physical an
The HCI quantifies the key stages in this trajectory and their consequences for the productivity of the next generation of w
Component 1: Survival from birth to school age, measured using under-5 mortality rates.
Component 2: Expected Years of Learning-Adjusted School, combining information on the quantity and quality of educati
of years of school a child can expect to attain by age 18 given the prevailing pattern of enrollment rates across grades. The
harmonize test scores from major international student achievement testing programs. These are combined into a measu
years of school” conversion metric proposed in the 2018 World Development Report.
Component 3: Health. In the absence of a single broadly-accepted, directly-measured, and widely-available metric, the ov
rates, defined as the fraction of 15-year olds that survive until age 60, and (ii) the rate of stunting for children under age 5
all countries, and can be interpreted as a proxy for the range of fatal and non-fatal health outcomes that a child born toda
future. Stunting is broadly accepted as a proxy for the pre-natal, infant and early childhood health environment, and so su
to experience in their early years – with important consequences for health and well-being in adulthood. Data on the pre
Malnutrition Estimates.
The HCI is measured in terms of the productivity of the next generation of workers, relative to the benchmark of complet
interpretation: a value of X for a particular country means that the productivity as a future worker of a child born in a give
the benchmark of complete education and full health. This can be decomposed into the contributions of the three compo
productivity relative to the benchmark. Multiplied together they arrive at the overall HCI. Differences in the human capita
of workers. In a country around the 25th percentile of the distribution of the HCI, a child born today will be only 43 perce
education and full health.
For more information on the HCI methodology, please see World Bank (2018). “The Human Capital Project”.
al Index (HCI): Methodology
onents of human capital across countries. The Human Capital Index (HCI) measures the amount
health and poor education that prevail in the country where she lives. The HCI is designed to
of the next generation of workers, assuming that children born today experience over the next
y face.
y. In the poorest countries in the world, there is a significant risk that the child does not even
oes not start school, let alone complete the full cycle of 14 years of school from pre-school to
nevenly into learning, depending on the quality of teachers and schools she experiences. When
d that limit her physical and cognitive abilities as an adult.
ntity and quality of education. The quantity of education is measured as the expected number
ent rates across grades. The quality of education reflects ongoing work at the World Bank to
are combined into a measure of learning-adjusted school years using the “learning-adjusted
ely-available metric, the overall health environment is captured by two proxies: (i) adult survival
ng for children under age 5. Adult survival rates are calculated by the UN Population Division for
omes that a child born today would experience as an adult if current conditions prevail into the
alth environment, and so summarizes the risks to good health that children born today are likely
adulthood. Data on the prevalence of stunting is reported in the WHO-UNICEF-World Bank Joint
the benchmark of complete education and full health. This gives the units of the index a natural
ker of a child born in a given year in that country is only a fraction X of what it could be under
butions of the three components of the HCI, each of which is also expressed in terms of
rences in the human capital have large implications for the productivity of the next generation
today will be only 43 percent as productive as she would be in the benchmark of complete
pital Project”.
Human Capital Index and Components: Summary Table
Database: Version September 21, 2018
Country: India
The last row reports the overall HCI score. The HCI combines the components above into a measure of productivity as a f
education and full health. The index ranges from zero to one, and a value of X means that a worker of the next generatio
complete education and full health.
The uncertainty intervals reflect the imprecision in the components and the overall index. They are obtained by recalcula
components of the HCI, that reflect the measurement error in the components. While the uncertainty intervals construc
that if for two countries they overlap substantially, the differences between their HCI values are not likely to be practicall
The gender-disaggregated HCI is calculated using only gender-disaggregated adult survival rates as a proxy for health if ge
lead to gender-disaggregated HCI estimates that are both higher or both lower than the gender-combined rate.
ts: Summary Table
ugh the current pattern of enrollment rates can expect to obtain by the age of 18, up to a maximum of 14
e been converted into common units with a mean of 500 and a standard deviation of 100 across students.
wo standard deviations or more below the normal height-for-age (i.e. 1-stunting rate).
measure of productivity as a future worker of a child born today, relative to the benchmark of complete
worker of the next generation will be only X×100 percent as she would be under the benchmark of
hey are obtained by recalculating the HCI using estimates of the lower and upper bounds of each of the
ncertainty intervals constructed here do not have a rigorous statistical interpretation, a rule of thumb is
are not likely to be practically meaningful.
ates as a proxy for health if gender-disaggregated stunting data are not available. In some cases this may
der-combined rate.
Human Capital Index and Components: Comparison
Database: Version September 21, 2018
Country: India
Uncertainty Interval
The last row reports the overall HCI score for the years 2012 and 2017. The HCI combines the components above into
to the benchmark of complete education and full health. The index ranges from zero to one, and a value of X means th
would be under the benchmark of complete education and full health.
The uncertainty intervals reflect the imprecision in the components and the overall index. They are obtained by recalc
the components of the HCI, that reflect the measurement error in the components. While the uncertainty intervals co
thumb is that if for two countries they overlap substantially, the differences between their HCI values are not likely to b
nd Components: Comparison over Time
ember 21, 2018
Source Year for Estimate in 2012 Estimate in Year 2017 Source Year for Estimate in 2017
through the current pattern of enrollment rates can expect to obtain by the age of 18, up to a maximum
t have been converted into common units with a mean of 500 and a standard deviation of 100 across
ot two standard deviations or more below the normal height-for-age (i.e. 1-stunting rate).
nes the components above into a measure of productivity as a future worker of a child born today, relative
o one, and a value of X means that a worker of the next generation will be only X×100 percent as she
ex. They are obtained by recalculating the HCI using estimates of the lower and upper bounds of each of
hile the uncertainty intervals constructed here do not have a rigorous statistical interpretation, a rule of
heir HCI values are not likely to be practically meaningful.
Human Capital Index and Components: Graphs
Database: Version September 21, 2018
Country: India
Note: The graph above shows the distribution of the 5 components of the Human Capital Index as well as the di
based on the latest data available. The red vertical lines indicate the quartiles of each variable. The black marker
distribution of the data for all countries, as indicated by the grey circles.
Human Capital Index and Components: Graphs
The graphs above plot the Human Capital Index and its components (on the vertical axis) against the logarithm o
Real GDP per capita adjusted for differences in purchasing power parity is taken from the Penn World Tables (Fe
filled using data from World Bank estimates of GDP at PPP. The graphs show cross-sections of the most recently-
reports uncertainty intervals as vertical lines around the estimated HCI for each country.
al Index as well as the distribution of the overall Human Capital Index
riable. The black marker shows where the country is located in the
) against the logarithm of real GDP per capita (on the horizontal axis).
e Penn World Tables (Feenstra et. al. (2015)), with missing countries
ns of the most recently-available data. The graph for the overall HCI
Human Capital Index and Components: Regional and Income Grou
Database: Version September 21, 2018
Lower Middle
India Low Income Income
Indicator
Male + Female Male + Female Male + Female
The above tables show the averages of the 5 components of the Human Capital Index and the average of the overall
Human Capital Index i) by region and ii) by income group. The averages are calculated based on the latest data availa
each country. The second column of the tables shows the values for the specific country of interest to facilitate comp
to its benchmarks. Empty cells indicate missing data.
nents: Regional and Income Group Benchmarks
Male + Female Male + Female Male + Female Male + Female Male + Female
0.983 0.995
11.7 13.3
428 506
0.863 0.923
0.869 0.935
0.58 0.74
Index and the average of the overall
ulated based on the latest data available for
country of interest to facilitate comparison
Probability of Survival to Age 5
Database: Version September 21, 2018
Country: India
2000 0.908 0.913 0.903 0.908 0.913 0.903 2000 2000 2000
2001 0.912 0.916 0.907 0.912 0.916 0.907 2001 2001 2001
2002 0.915 0.920 0.911 0.915 0.920 0.911 2002 2002 2002
2003 0.919 0.923 0.914 0.919 0.923 0.914 2003 2003 2003
2004 0.922 0.926 0.918 0.922 0.926 0.918 2004 2004 2004
2005 0.925 0.929 0.921 0.925 0.929 0.921 2005 2005 2005
2006 0.929 0.932 0.925 0.929 0.932 0.925 2006 2006 2006
2007 0.932 0.936 0.928 0.932 0.936 0.928 2007 2007 2007
2008 0.935 0.938 0.932 0.935 0.938 0.932 2008 2008 2008
2009 0.938 0.941 0.935 0.938 0.941 0.935 2009 2009 2009
2010 0.942 0.944 0.939 0.942 0.944 0.939 2010 2010 2010
2011 0.945 0.947 0.942 0.945 0.947 0.942 2011 2011 2011
2012 0.948 0.950 0.945 0.948 0.950 0.945 2012 2012 2012
2013 0.951 0.952 0.949 0.951 0.952 0.949 2013 2013 2013
2014 0.953 0.955 0.952 0.953 0.955 0.952 2014 2014 2014
2015 0.956 0.957 0.955 0.956 0.957 0.955 2015 2015 2015
2016 0.958 0.959 0.957 0.958 0.959 0.957 2016 2016 2016
2017 0.961 0.961 0.960 0.961 0.961 0.960 2017 2017 2017
Note: This table reports data on the probability of survival from birth to age 5, based on estimates of under-5 mortality
“Most Recent Estimate” reports the most recently-available observation for each year, going back up to 10 years to fill i
from which the most recent observation is taken. Empty cells indicate missing data.
Source: UN Interagency Group for Child Mortality Estimates, 18 September 2018 data release, unless otherwise indicat
Source
tes of under-5 mortality rates. “As Reported” refers to data as reported in the original source.
ack up to 10 years to fill in missing observations. “Year of Most Recent Estimate” indicates the year
Note: This table reports estimates of expected years of school by age 18. It is calculated as the sum of age-specific enr
approximated using school enrollment rates at different levels: pre-primary enrollment rates approximate the age-spec
for 6-11 year-olds; the lower-secondary rate approximates for 12-14 year-olds; and the upper-secondary approximates
0 to 14 years, and differences across countries and over time reflect only differences in enrollment rates. The preferred
enrollment rate. If total net enrollment rates are not available, other available rates are used. If data on repetition are
third panel of the table. Gaps in the enrollment series have been filled using lags up to 10 years. The year of the most
reported in the second panel of the table. Empty cells indicate missing data. For details on which enrollment rates are
Details".
Source: Enrollment rates are taken from UNESCO Institute of Statistics, and are supplemented with data gathered by W
databases used, see the sheet "Enrollment Details".
or Repetition (Yes/No)
Source
Only
Female
s the sum of age-specific enrollment rates between ages 4 and 17. Age-specific enrollment rates are
tes approximate the age-specific enrolment rates for 4 and 5 year-olds; the primary rate approximates
pper-secondary approximates for 15-17 year-olds. This means that expected years of school ranges from
nrollment rates. The preferred enrollment rate used in this calculation is the repetition-adjusted total net
sed. If data on repetition are not available, the non-repetition-adjusted rates are used, as indicated in the
years. The year of the most recently-available primary enrollment rate on which the estimate is based is
n which enrollment rates are used and the treatment of missing values, see the sheet "Enrollment
nted with data gathered by World Bank staff as indicated. For more details on the different sources and
Harmonized Test Scores
Database: Version September 21, 2018
Country: India
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009 355 347 362 355 347 362 2009 2009 2009
2010 355 347 362 2009 2009 2009
2011 355 347 362 2009 2009 2009
2012 355 347 362 2009 2009 2009
2013 355 347 362 2009 2009 2009
2014 355 347 362 2009 2009 2009
2015 355 347 362 2009 2009 2009
2016 355 347 362 2009 2009 2009
2017 355 347 362 2009 2009 2009
• TIMSS/PIRLS: Refers to average of test scores from TIMSS (Trends in International Maths and Science Study) and PIRLS (P
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Data from each PIRLS round is moved to the year
• PISA: Refers to test scores from Programme for International Student Assessment
• PISA+TIMSS/PIRLS: Refers to the average of these programs for countries and years where both are available
• SACMEQ: Refers to test scores from Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality
• PASEC: Refers to test scores from Program of Analysis of Education Systems
• LLECE: Refers to test scores from Latin American Laboratory for Assessment of the Quality of Education
• EGRA: Refers to test scores from nationally-representative Early Grade Reading Assessments.
• EGRANR: Refers to test scores from non-nationally-representative Early Grade Reading Assessments
Source: Patrinos, Harry Anthony, and Noam Angrist (2018). “A Global Dataset on Education Quality: A Review and Update (2
Testing Programme Source
d Science Study) and PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study), both carried out by the
S round is moved to the year of the nearest TIMSS round and averaged with the TIMSS data.
of Education
s.
ssments
uality: A Review and Update (2000–2017).” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8592.
Probability of Survival from Age 15-60
Database: Version September 21, 2018
Country: India
Note: This table reports data on the probability of survival from age 15 to age 60, based on estimated mortality rates o
been linearly-interpolated to annual frequency. “As Reported” refers to data as reported in the original source. “Most R
each year, going back up to 10 years to fill in missing observations. “Year of Most Recent Estimate” indicates the year fr
missing data.
Source: United Nations Population Division World Population Prospects, 2017 data release, unless otherwise indicated
ost Recent Estimate
Female Source
Only
2000 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2001 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2002 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2003 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2004 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2005 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2006 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2007 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2008 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2009 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2010 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2011 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2012 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2013 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2014 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2015 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2016 UN Population Division, Interpolated
2017 UN Population Division, Interpolated
sed on estimated mortality rates over this age range. Data are reported for 5-year intervals, and have
ted in the original source. “Most Recent Estimate” reports the most recently-available observation for
ent Estimate” indicates the year from which the most recent observation is taken. Empty cells indicate
Note: This table reports data on the fraction of children below the age of 5 whose height-for-age is not two or more stan
(i.e. 1-stunting rate). “As Reported” refers to data as reported in the original source. “Most Recent Estimate” reports the
years to fill in missing observations. “Year of Most Recent Estimate” indicates the year from which the most recent obse
Source: UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Joint Malnutrition Estimates, May 2018 data release, unless otherwise indicated. Info
Not Stunted
ght-for-age is not two or more standard deviations below the reference median for normal child development
Most Recent Estimate” reports the most recently-available observation for each year, going back up to 10
from which the most recent observation is taken. Empty cells indicate missing data.
e, unless otherwise indicated. Information on the primary data source from which the estimates are taken can be retrieved from this site.
Enrollment Details
Database: Version September 21, 201
Country: India
1. Pre-Primary
Gross Enrollment Rate Net Enrollment Rate Adjusted Net Enrollment Total Net Enrollment
(GER) (NER) Rate (ANER) Rate (TNER)
Year
Male + Only Only Male + Only Only Male + Only Only Male +
Female Male Female Female Male Female Female Male Female Female
2000
2001 3.5 3.7 3.3
2002 6.1 6.3 6.0
2003 7.3 7.2 7.3
2004 6.6 6.6 6.6
2005 6.2 6.2 6.2
2006 6.9 6.8 6.9
2007 7.0 7.1 6.9
2008 8.5 8.6 8.4
2009 7.5 7.5 7.6
2010 7.2 7.2 7.2
2011 7.7 7.8 7.6
2012 7.9 8.0 7.7
2013 9.6 10.0 9.2
2014 11.7 12.1 11.3
2015 12.2 12.6 11.8
2016 12.9 13.3 12.5
2017
Gross Enrollment Rate Net Enrollment Rate Adjusted Net Enrollment Total Net Enrollment
(GER) (NER) Rate (ANER) Rate (TNER)
Year
Male + Only Only Male + Only Only Male + Only Only Male +
Female Male Female Female Male Female Female Male Female Female
2000 94.6 102.2 86.3 79.8 86.2 72.8 84.2 91.0 76.7 84.2
2001 94.4 101.5 86.7 79.7 85.6 73.2 84.1 90.2 77.4 84.1
2002 95.1 101.2 88.3 79.3 84.4 73.5 83.9 89.4 77.8 83.9
2003 103.0 104.3 101.5 83.8 84.9 82.6 88.7 90.0 87.3 88.7
2004
2005
2006
2007 110.2 111.2 109.2 91.3 91.9 90.6 97.0 97.7 96.2 97.0
2008 110.9 110.4 111.5 91.0 90.5 91.6 97.0 96.4 97.7 97.0
2009 109.6 108.4 110.9 90.8 89.6 92.0 95.7 94.5 96.9 95.7
2010 109.2 108.1 110.4 91.0 90.1 92.1 96.2 95.3 97.2 96.2
2011 108.4 106.9 110.0 90.4 89.2 91.8 95.8 94.5 97.2 95.8
2012 109.8 108.0 111.7 91.6 91.0 92.2 97.0 96.4 97.7 97.0
2013 110.6 104.8 117.0 92.3 91.7 92.9 97.7 97.1 98.4 97.7
2014 107.9 102.3 114.0
2015 108.5 102.7 115.0
2016 114.5 106.1 123.9
2017
Gross Enrollment Rate Net Enrollment Rate Adjusted Net Enrollment Total Net Enrollment
(GER) (NER) Rate (ANER) Rate (TNER)
Year
Male + Only Only Male + Only Only Male + Only Only Male +
Female Male Female Female Male Female Female Male Female Female
Enrollment Details
Notes: This table reports data on enrollment rates and repetition rates used to construct estimates of expected years o
• “Gross Enrollment Rate” (GER) measures the number of children of any age who are enrolled in a given level, as a fra
• “Net Enrollment Rate” (NER) measures the fraction of children in the theoretical age range for a given level of school
• “Adjusted Net Enrollment Rate” (ANER) measures the fraction of children in the theoretical age range for a given leve
• “Total Net Enrollment Rate” (TNER) measures the fraction of children in the theoretical age range for a given level of
To build the measures of enrollment rates used to calculate expected years of school, missing values of each enrollmen
each level is selected based on availability of the filled-in series in 2017, in the following order of preference: TNER>AN
the columns labelled “Enrollment Rate Used to Calculate Expected Years of School”. The column "Based on Type" indica
“Repetition Rate” report the fraction of enrolled students in a given level who are repeating that grade (not reported fo
Expected School Years, Repetition-Adjusted" report the repetition-adjusted enrollment rate based on these repetition r
resulting enrollment rates > 100% are top-coded at 100%. Empty cells indicate missing data.
Sources: Unless otherwise noted, enrollment rates are taken from the UNESCO Institute of Statistics database, UIS.Stat
Adjusted Net Enrollment Rates (ANER) for Upper Secondary are retrieved from the UNESCO Institute of Statistics websi
Repetition Rates and Total Net Enrollment Rates (TNER) for Upper Secondary are retrieved from the UNESCO Institute o
ent Details
Version September 21, 2018
1. Pre-Primary
2. Primary
Only Only Male + Only Only Based on Male + Only Only Male + Only Only
Male Female Female Male Female Type: Female Male Female Female Male Female
91.0 76.7 84.2 91.0 76.7 TNER 4.2 4.2 4.1 80.7 87.2 73.5
90.2 77.4 84.1 90.2 77.4 TNER 3.7 3.7 3.7 81.0 86.9 74.5
89.4 77.8 83.9 89.4 77.8 TNER 3.6 3.6 3.7 80.8 86.2 74.9
90.0 87.3 88.7 90.0 87.3 TNER 3.6 3.6 3.6 85.5 86.8 84.2
88.7 90.0 87.3 TNER 85.5 86.8 84.2
88.7 90.0 87.3 TNER 85.5 86.8 84.2
88.7 90.0 87.3 TNER 85.5 86.8 84.2
97.7 96.2 97.0 97.7 96.2 TNER 3.5 3.5 3.5 93.6 94.2 92.9
96.4 97.7 97.0 96.4 97.7 TNER 3.5 3.6 3.5 93.6 93.0 94.2
94.5 96.9 95.7 94.5 96.9 TNER 92.3 91.2 93.5
95.3 97.2 96.2 95.3 97.2 TNER 92.8 91.9 93.8
94.5 97.2 95.8 94.5 97.2 TNER 5.0 5.1 5.0 91.0 89.7 92.4
96.4 97.7 97.0 96.4 97.7 TNER 2.6 2.7 2.6 94.4 93.8 95.2
97.1 98.4 97.7 97.1 98.4 TNER 2.1 2.2 2.1 95.6 95.0 96.4
97.7 97.1 98.4 TNER 1.3 1.3 1.3 96.5 95.8 97.2
97.7 97.1 98.4 TNER 0.8 0.8 0.7 97.0 96.3 97.7
97.7 97.1 98.4 TNER 0.5 0.5 0.5 97.2 96.6 97.9
97.7 97.1 98.4 TNER 97.2 96.6 97.9
3. Lower Secondary
Only Only Male + Only Only Based on Male + Only Only Male + Only Only
Male Female Female Male Female Type: Female Male Female Female Male Female
4. Upper Secondary
Enrollment Rate Used to Calculate Enrollment Rate Used to Calculate
Total Net Enrollment Expected School Years, Not Repetition Rate (REP) Expected School Years, Repetition-
Rate (TNER) Repetition-Adjusted Adjusted
Only Only Male + Only Only Based on Male + Only Only Male + Only Only
Male Female Female Male Female Type: Female Male Female Female Male Female
53.0 51.4 52.2 53.0 51.4 TNER 2.6 2.6 2.5 50.9 51.6 50.1
52.2 53.0 51.4 TNER 2.5 2.6 2.5 50.9 51.6 50.1
52.2 53.0 51.4 TNER 2.5 2.6 2.4 50.9 51.6 50.1
52.2 53.0 51.4 TNER 2.3 2.4 2.2 51.0 51.7 50.3
52.2 53.0 51.4 TNER 51.0 51.7 50.3
nrolled in a given level, as a fraction of the number of children in that age range.
nge for a given level of school who are in school at that level.
tical age range for a given level of school who are in school at that level or the level above.
age range for a given level of school, who are in school at any level.
ssing values of each enrollment rate are filled using lags of up to 10 years. The enrollment rate used at
order of preference: TNER>ANER>NER>GER. This filled-in time series of the selected rate is reported in
column "Based on Type" indicates which of these enrollment rates is used. The columns labelled
ting that grade (not reported for pre-primary). The columns "Enrollment Rate Used to Calculate
ate based on these repetition rates, after filling in missing values using lags of up to 10 years. Any
ata.
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
Used to Calculate
Years, Repetition-
usted
Notes
Based on
Type:
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
Used to Calculate
Years, Repetition-
usted Notes
Based on
Type:
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER
TNER