Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
net/publication/326345853
CITATIONS READS
5 663
12 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Rian Vebrianto on 19 August 2018.
Research Paper
Abstract
Employees are seen as one of the important company assets and need to be managed and developed to support the survival and achieve-
ment of corporate goals. One form of employee organization that can be done by the company is to provide the appropriate remuneration
or salary payments for employees. Increase in salary greatly affects the motivation and productivity of employees in implementing and
completing the work. To determine the magnitude of the salary increase, a system is needed that can support the decision making done
by the manager. Utilization of decision support system using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method helps managers to make quicker
and more accurate decision making. This method is chosen because it is able to select the best alternative from a number of alternatives
that exist based on the criteria specified. The research is done by finding the weight value for each attribute then done ranking which will
determine the optimal alternative.
Copyright © 2018 Nashrudin Setiawan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
310 International Journal of Engineering & Technology
The preference value for determining the ranking result is as fol- = (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.6) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 0.4) = 0.66
lows: = (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.4) = 0.91
= (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.6) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 0.4) = 0.66
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.8) = 0.92 (15%)
= (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 0.2) = 0.68
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.6) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.8) = 0.87 (10%)
= (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 0.2) = 0.68
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.8) = 0.92 (15%)
= (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.6) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 0.2) = 0.63
= (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.6) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 0.8) = 0.72 (5%)
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.2) = 0.83
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.6) = 0.89 (10%)
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.2) = 0.83
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.4) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.4) = 0.76 (5%)
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.2) = 0.83
= (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.4) = 0.7725 (5%)
= (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 1) + (0.15 x 0.2) = 0.7425
= (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.6) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 0.8) = 0.72 (5%)
= (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.6) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 0.2) = 0.63
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.4) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 1) = 0.7875 (5%)
= (0.35 x 1) + (0.25 x 0.8) + (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 1) = 0.8875 = (0.35 x 0.75) + (0.25 x 0.6)(10%)
+ (0.25 x 0.75) + (0.15 x 0.2) = 0.63
International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 24, no. Absolute Percentage Error,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 930, no. 1, p.
14, pp. 2657–2669, 2013. 012002, Dec. 2017.
[3] J. Jasri, D. Siregar, and R. Rahim, “Decision Support System Best [25] E. Azimirad and J. Haddadnia, “Target threat assessment using
Employee Assessments with Technique for Order of Preference by fuzzy sets theory,” Int. J. Adv. Intell. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp.
Similarity to Ideal Solution,” Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Res., vol. 3, 57–74, Aug. 2015.
no. 3, pp. 6–17, Mar. 2017. [26] H. Hamdani and R. Wardoyo, “A review on fuzzy multi-criteria
[4] R. Rahim, H. Nurdiyanto, A. S. Ahmar, D. Abdullah, D. Hartama, decision making land clearing for oil palm plantation,” Int. J. Adv.
and D. Napitupulu, “Keylogger Application to Monitoring Users Intell. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 75–83, Jul. 2015.
Activity with Exact String Matching Algorithm,” J. Phys. Conf. [27] I. Kaliszewski and D. Podkopaev, “Simple additive weighting - A
Ser., vol. 954, no. 1, 2018. metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods,” Expert
[5] A. Putera, U. Siahaan, and R. Rahim, “Dynamic Key Matrix of Hill Syst. Appl., vol. 54, pp. 155–161, 2016.
Cipher Using Genetic Algorithm,” Int. J. Secur. Its Appl., vol. 10, [28] A. Pranolo and S. M. Widyastuti, “Simple Additive Weighting
no. 8, pp. 173–180, Aug. 2016. Method on Intelligent Agent for Urban Forest Health Monitoring,”
[6] R. Rahim, M. Dahria, M. Syahril, and B. Anwar, “Combination of in 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER,
the Blowfish and Lempel-Ziv-Welch algorithms for text CONTROL, INFORMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS (IC3INA),
compression,” World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 2014, pp. 132–135.
292–297, 2017. [29] N. Nurmalini and R. Rahim, “Study Approach of Simple Additive
[7] R. Rahim, “Man-in-the-middle-attack prevention using interlock Weighting For Decision Support System,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci.
protocol method,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 22, pp. Technol., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 541–544, 2017.
6483–6487, 2017. [30] I. Tahyudin, R. Rosyidi, A. S. Ahmar, and Haviluddin,
[8] D. Siregar, D. Arisandi, A. Usman, D. Irwan, and R. Rahim, “Comparison of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) with the
“Research of Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique for Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution
Decision Support,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 930, no. 1, p. 012015, (TOPSIS) methods,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.2, pp. 87–89,
Dec. 2017. 2018.
[9] A. Alesyanti, R. Ramlan, H. Hartono, and R. Rahim, “Ethical [31] A. Aljuaidi, “Decision support system analysis with the graph
decision support system based on hermeneutic view focus on social model on non-cooperative generic water resource conflicts,” Int. J.
justice,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.9, pp. 74–77, 2018. Eng. Technol., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 145, Oct. 2017.
[10] Y. Rossanty, D. Hasibuan, J. Napitupulu, M. Dharma, and T. Putra, [32] J. Shang, P. R. Tadikamalla, L. J. Kirsch, and L. Brown, “A
“Composite performance index as decision support method for decision support system for managing inventory at
multi case problem,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.9, pp. 33–36, GlaxoSmithKline,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–13,
2018. 2008.
[11] S. H. Sahir, R. Rosmawati, and R. Rahim, “Fuzzy model tahani as a [33] R. Rahim, I. Zulkarnain, and H. Jaya, “A review: search
decision support system for selection computer tablet,” Int. J. Eng. visualization with Knuth Morris Pratt algorithm,” in IOP
Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.9, pp. 61–65, 2018. Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, vol.
[12] T. Simanihuruk et al., “Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets with 237, no. 1, p. 012026.
Fuzzy Grid Partition in Determining the Best Lecturer,” Int. J. Eng. [34] R. Rahim, A. S. Ahmar, A. P. Ardyanti, and D. Nofriansyah,
Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.3, pp. 59–62, 2018. “Visual Approach of Searching Process using Boyer-Moore
[13] M. D. T. P. Nasution et al., “Decision support rating system with Algorithm,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 930, no. 1, p. 012001, Dec.
Analytical Hierarchy Process method,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, 2017.
2018. [35] R. Ratnadewi, E. M. Sartika, R. Rahim, B. Anwar, M. Syahril, and
[14] C. H. Primasari, R. Wardoyo, and A. K. Sari, “Integrated AHP, H. Winata, “Crossing Rivers Problem Solution with Breadth-First
Profile Matching, and TOPSIS for selecting type of goats based on Search Approach,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science
environmental and financial criteria,” Int. J. Adv. Intell. Informatics, and Engineering, 2018, vol. 288, no. 1.
vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 28–39, Mar. 2018. [36] R. Rahim et al., “Block Architecture Problem with Depth First
[15] N. Kurniasih, A. S. Ahmar, D. R. Hidayat, H. Agustin, and E. Rizal, Search Solution and Its Application,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 954,
“Forecasting Infant Mortality Rate for China: A Comparison no. 1, p. 012006, 2018.
Between α-Sutte Indicator, ARIMA, and Holt-Winters,” J. Phys. [37] F. Haswan, “Decision Support System For Election Of Members
Conf. Ser., vol. 1028, no. 1, p. 012195, 2018. Unit Patients Pamong Praja,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 1, no. 1,
[16] A. S. Ahmar, “A Comparison of α-Sutte Indicator and ARIMA p. 21, Jun. 2017.
Methods in Renewable Energy Forecasting in Indonesia,” Int. J. [38] S. H. Zanakis, A. Solomon, N. Wishart, and S. Dublish, “Multi-
Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1.6, pp. 20–22, 2018. attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select
[17] A. Rahman and A. S. Ahmar, “Forecasting of primary energy methods,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 507–529, 1998.
consumption data in the United States: A comparison between
ARIMA and Holter-Winters models,” in AIP Conference
Proceedings, 2017, vol. 1885.
[18] A. S. Ahmar et al., “Modeling Data Containing Outliers using
ARIMA Additive Outlier (ARIMA-AO),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol.
954, 2018.
[19] D. U. Sutiksno, A. S. Ahmar, N. Kurniasih, E. Susanto, and A.
Leiwakabessy, “Forecasting Historical Data of Bitcoin using
ARIMA and α-Sutte Indicator,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1028, no. 1,
p. 012194, 2018.
[20] A. S. Ahmar, “A comparison of α-Sutte Indicator and ARIMA
methods in renewable energy forecasting in Indonesia,” Int. J. Eng.
Technol., vol. 7, 2018.
[21] Surahman, A. Viddy, A. F. O. Gaffar, Haviluddin, and A. S. Ahmar,
“Selection of the best supply chain strategy using fuzzy based
decision model,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 22, pp. 117–121,
2018.
[22] Haviluddin, F. Agus, M. Azhari, and A. S. Ahmar, “Artificial
Neural Network Optimized Approach for Improving Spatial Cluster
Quality of Land Value Zone,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.2,
pp. 80–83, 2018.
[23] A. Indahingwati, M. Barid, N. Wajdi, D. E. Susilo, N. Kurniasih,
and R. Rahim, “Comparison Analysis of TOPSIS and Fuzzy Logic
Methods On Fertilizer Selection,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no.
2.3, pp. 109–114, 2018.
[24] U. Khair, H. Fahmi, S. Al Hakim, and R. Rahim, “Forecasting
Error Calculation with Mean Absolute Deviation and Mean