INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Key Result Area Weight Objectives Weight per MOV RPMS 5-point Rating Numerical Ratings SCORE
per KRA Objective
Scale / Checklist
Q E T Ave.
Objective 1. Applied knowledge of □ COT 1 2 3 4 Ave.
□ DLL
content within and across curriculum
7.5% □ IM
areas □ Performance Task/Test
KRA 1: □ Others
CONTENT Objective 2. Used a range of teaching □ COT 1 2 3 4 Ave.
□ DLL
KNOWLEDGE strategies that enhance learner
22.5% achievement in literacy and numeracy 7.5% □ IM
AND □ Performance Task/Test
skills □ Assessment Result
PEDAGOGY
Objective 3. Applied a range of teaching 1 2 3 4 Ave.
□ COT
strategies to develop critical and creative □ DLL
thinking, as well as other higher-order 7.5% □ IM
thinking skills. □ Performance Task/Test

Objective 4. Managed classroom 1 2 3 4 Ave.

structure to engage learners, individually □ COT
or in groups, in meaningful exploration, 7.5% □ DLL
discovery and hands-on activities within a □ Others
range of physical learning environments.
KRA 2:
Objective 5. Managed learner behavior 1 2 3 4 Ave.
LEARNING constructively by applying positive and
ENVIRONMENT 22.5% 7.5% □ COT
non-violent discipline to ensure learning-
AND DIVERSITY focused environments.
OF LEARNERS Objective 6. Used differentiated, 1 2 3 4 Ave.
developmentally appropriate learning □ COT
experiences to address learners’ gender, □ DLL
7.5% □ IM
needs, strengths, interests and □ Others
experiences.
 Objective 7. Planned, managed and □ COT
1 2 3 4 Ave.
implemented developmentally sequenced □ DLL
teaching and learning processes to meet 7.5% □ IM
curriculum requirements and varied □ Others
teaching contexts.
KRA 3:
Objective 8. Participated in collegial □ LAC/FGD
CURRICULUM 22.5%
7.5%
discussions that use teacher and learner □ Others
PLANNING feedback to enrich teaching practice.
Objective 9. Selected, developed, □ COT 1 2 3 4 Ave.
organized and used appropriate teaching □ DLL
7.5%
and learning resources, including ICT, to □ Others
address learning goals.

Objective 10. Designed, selected, □ COT 1 2 3 4 Ave.

□ DLL
organized and used diagnostic, formative
7.5% □ Diagnostic test
and summative assessment strategies □ Summative test
consistent with curriculum requirements. □ Performance task
Objective 11. Monitored and evaluated □ Compilation of work
KRA 4: learner progress and achievement using □ Formative/Summative
Assessment
ASSESSMENT learner attainment data. 7.5%
22.5% □ Class record/Grading
AND sheet
REPORTING □ DLL
Objective 12. Communicated promptly □ Test papers (3)
□ PTA meeting
and clearly the learners’ needs, progress
□ Report card
and achievement to key stakeholders, 7.5% □ Communication w/
including parents/guardians. parent
□ Anecdotal

Objective 13. Performed various related (Certificate of Recognition

or Participation, Training,
works/activities that contribute to the Speakership, Community
KRA 5: teaching-learning process. Involvement, Book or
10% 10% Journal Authorship,
PLUS FACTOR Coordinatorship/
Chairpersonship, Coaching,
Mentoring, Others)
FINAL RATING:
ADJECTIVAL RATING:

JUAN DELA CRUZ JUAN DELA CRUZ JUAN DELA CRUZ

Rater Ratee Approving Authority