Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Contents:
2. Crane rails
2.1.1. Crane rail versus railway rail
2.1.2. Families of rails
2.1.3. Railway rails
2.1.4. Crane rails
2.1.5. Uncommon crane rails
3. Comparison of rails
3.1.1. Head width versus weight
3.1.2. Vertical bending versus head width
3.1.3. Vertical bending versus weight
3.1.4. Crane rails versus railway rails for crane applications
3.1.5. Rail head shape
3.1.6. Metallurgy of rails
3.1.7. Stresses at the head of a rail
4. Crane wheels
4.1.1. Crane wheel types
4.1.2. Clearances wheel to rail
4.1.3. Crane wheel/rail interaction
4.1.4. Hardness of wheels
9. Contact Gantrail
Cranes and industrial machines with steel (or cast iron) wheels are normally mounted on steel rail.
Wheel loads can range from under a tonne to well over 100 tonne. The crane or machine is normally
designed by a mechanical engineer using nationally or internationally recognised design rules. Rails
are typically installed within a civil engineering contract. They work to different rules to those of the
mechanical engineer and the two sets of rules do not cover the interface effectively. The strength and
accuracy of the fixing of the rails is most important for smooth running of machines. This Rail Book is
an attempt to bridge the gap. It covers a wide range of information that may be of value to engineers
and contractors who must install crane rails. Gantry Railing Limited (known as Gantrail) has prepared
this document. The company was founded in 1965 and has been working at the heart of this activity
ever since then. Gantrail’s business is installing crane rails and supplying all the required materials
and equipment.
There are well over a hundred rail sections used, some of which are specifically for crane application
but others, while they may be used for cranes are primarily for railway use. Rails are made all over the
world. There are ranges of shapes, sizes, strengths and hardnesses of rail and the steels from which
they are made. Rails are best when they are jointed to avoid noise, vibration and damage to the
machine as it passes over them. The rails ideally need to be fixed with fastenings systems that allow
accurate adjustment on the construction site. This book attempts to cover all these areas.
2. Crane rails
Crane rails (centre and left) and railway rails (right) at a stockist
Steel rails are used in both railway and crane applications but the needs are different and hence the
rails are also different. Trains travel at speeds much greater than cranes and their wagon wheel loads
are typically very much lower. Railway rails are typically designed to span from one sleeper (railroad
tie in the US) to the next while having a hard head to take the wear of the wheel of the wagons. Many
cranes are mounted on rails which are continuously supported and thus they do not need the same
level of beam bending strength. Most rails have a flat bottom or foot. Crane rails can normally be
differentiated from railway rails by their thicker webs. Rails need a foot width greater than the head so
that they have stability to forces perpendicular to the length of the rail. Such forces tend to overturn
them. The drawing below shows three sections. The following table shows the main properties for
these rails.
The UIC 60 rail section is widely used for railways around the world. It is also known by other names
normally containing the digits 60 indicating a weight of 60 kilograms per metre. The German DIN
standard 536 A75 rail is widely used but it was originally designed to be riveted to the top of a steel
girder. It is not a good crane rail for all applications that are found now. The QU 70 from China has
substantially the same dimensions as rails from India and other countries. It is a good all round design
for crane application. In the case of these two rails the numbers indicate the width of the head of the
rail in millimeters.
Drawing 1: UIC 60; an internationally used railway rail, A75; a German crane rail and QU70; a taller
Chinese crane rail. Note the thin web of the railway rail in comparison with the two crane rails.
Many rails are designed in what might be termed families. These typically have similarities in their
cross section for a range of different sizes and weights. This is most noticeable with families of railway
rails. The main families are national and indicate past strengths in a countries manufacture capacity.
Thus there is a British family, a German family, an American family and a Japanese family all of which
are still widely used. These have rails ranging from perhaps 10 kilograms per metre (kg/m) to 60 kg/m.
Some American railway rails are heavier.
The following table sets out details for a number of families of railway rails indicating the country of
origin of the design specification.
Flat bottomed railway rails from the UK Flat bottomed railway rails from Germany
Height A Foot B Head C Web S Weight Height A Foot B Head C Web S Weight
Rail Name Rail Name
mm mm mm mm kg/m mm mm mm mm kg/m
BS 20 M 65.1 55.6 30.96 6.8 9.8 S10 70 58 32 6 10
BS 30 M 75.4 69.9 38.1 9.1 14.9 S14 80 70 38 9 14
BS 35 M 81 76.2 42.9 9.1 17.45 S18 93 82 43 10 18.3
BS 50 O 100 100 52.4 10.3 24.8 S20 100 82 44 10 19.8
BS 60 A 114.3 109.54 57.15 11.1 30.6 S30 108 108 60.3 12.3 30.03
BS 60 R 114.3 109.54 57.15 11.1 29.8 S33 134 105 58 11 33.47
BS 70 A 123.8 111.12 60.32 12.3 34.8 S41 R10 138 125 67 12 41.38
BS 75 R 128.6 122.2 61.9 13.1 37.04 S41 R14 138 125 67 12 40.95
BS 80 A 133.4 117.5 63.5 13.1 39.8 S49 149 125 67 14 49.43
BS 80 R 133.35 127 63.5 13.5 39.674 S54 154 125 67.1 16 54.5
BS 90 A 142.9 127 66.7 14 45.1 S64 172 150 74 16 64.9
BS 95 R 147.64 141.3 68.26 14.3 44.5
BS 110 A 158.8 139.7 69.9 15.8 54.5
BS 113 A 158.8 139.7 69.9 20 56.4
Flat bottomed railway rails from Japan Flat bottomed railway rails from the USA
Height A Foot B Head C Web S Weight Height A Foot B Head C Web S Weight
Rail Name Rail Name
mm mm mm mm kg/m mm mm mm mm kg/m
JIS 12kg/m 69.8 69.8 38.1 7.5 12.2 ASCE 12 50.8 50.8 25.4 4.8 5.95
JIS 15kg/m 79.37 79.37 42.86 8.3 15.2 ASCE 20 66.7 66.7 34.1 6.4 9.92
JIS 22kg/m 93.7 93.7 50.8 10.7 22.3 ASCE 25 69.9 69.9 38.1 7.5 12.4
JIS 30kg/m 107.95 107.95 60.3 12.3 30.1 ASCE 30 79.4 79.4 42.9 8.3 14.9
JIS 37kg/m 122.24 122.24 62.71 13.5 37.2 ASCE 40 88.9 88.9 47.6 9.9 19.9
JIS 40 kg/m 140 122 63.6 14 40.9 ASCE 50 98 98 54 25
JIS 50kg/m 144.5 127 63.4 14.3 50.4 ASCE 60 108 108 60.3 12.3 29.8
JIS 50N
kg/m 153 127 63.8 15 50.4 ASCE 70 117.5 117.5 61.9 13.1 34.5
JIS 60 kg/m 174 145 63.6 16.5 60.8 ASCE 80 127 127 63.5 13.9 39.8
ASCE 85 131.8 131.8 65.1 14.3 42.3
Flat bottomed railway rails from the International Union of
Railways UIC 132 AREA 181 152.4 74.6 16.7 66
Height A Foot B Head C Web S Weight
Rail Name
mm mm mm mm kg/m
UIC 54 159 140 70 16 54.4
UIC 54 E 161 125 65.6 16 53.9
UIC 60 172 150 72 16.5 60.3
Crane rails were rolled in a number of industrial countries with cross sections designed by the local
steel company, the country’s national standards body or of another countries designs. There are now
only a few countries rolling crane rail and there are even fewer designs. The most widely used rails
are rolled to the German standard DIN 536 Part 1 1991. They are rolled in a number of countries in
Europe. The next large family by number of rails has its origins in Russian aid after the Second World
War. The Russian origin designs are used in Poland, India and China where they have prefixes PR,
ISCR and QU respectively. The UK no longer rolls the rail that it designed in the past but some of the
designs are rolled in other parts of the world. The crane rails from the USA were rolled by just two
companies and have five similar shaped sections. There are two Japanese crane rail sections. In
Australia and South Africa they used British sections, which are rolled in small quantities in steel mills
specialising in rolling crane rails. The following two drawings show the dimensions that are normally
used to fully define a rail and the dimensions that are used in this document.
Drawing 3: The dimensions used in this book to present and compare rails.
The following tables show the main properties of crane rails that are still generally available. For
convenience they have been divided by head size with less than 100 mm, nominally 100 mm and over
100 mm. The highlighted numbers are the basis for the numbers in the rail name.
Crane rails with head width less than 100 mm
Country of origin Neutral
Height A Foot F Head C Web S Weight Area
Rail Designation of design or Ixx cm4 Iyy cm4 axis
mm mm mm mm kg/m cm2
standard to Base N
Luxemburg &
MRS 51 USA 127 127 63.5 25.4 51.6 66.39 1242 356 56.1
Luxemburg &
MRS 52 USA 131.76 131.76 65.1 23.8 52.09 66.45 1432 362 61.2
Luxemburg &
MRS 67 USA 146.1 131.8 79.4 31.8 67 85.9 2105 503 71.3
Luxemburg &
MRS 73 Australia 157 146 70 32 73.63 9380 2660 674 68
A45 Germany 55 125 45 24 22.1 28.2 90 170 21.7
A55 Germany 65 150 55 31 31.8 40.5 178 337 26
A65 Germany 75 175 65 38 43.1 54.9 319 606 30.3
A75 Germany 85 200 75 45 56.2 71.6 531 1011 34.6
Luxemburg &
73 kg AS Australia 157 146 70 31.8 73.6 93.8 2660 674.4 67
104 CR (MRS 51) USA 127 127 63.5 25.4 51.7 66.45 1240 355.9 56.1
105 CR (MRS 52) USA 131.8 131.8 65.1 23.8 52.2 66.45 1432 364.4 61.2
135 CR (MRS 67) USA 146.1 131.8 78.9 31.8 67.1 85.8 2106 500.8 71.4
QU 70 China 120 120 70 28 52.8 67.3 1081.99 327.16 5.93
QU 80 China 130 130 80 32 63.7 81.13 1547.4 482.39 6.43
ISCR 50 India 90 90 50 20 29.8 38 357.5 111.4 43.2
ISCR 60 India 105 105 60 24 40 51 654.6 195.9 48.3
ISCR 80 India 130 130 80 32 64.2 81.8 1524 468.6 64.7
MRS 125 Luxemburg 180 180 120 40 125 160.3 6225 2250 88.6
Luxemburg &
MRS 192 Australia 157.2 229 140 128.3 192
MRS 221 Luxemburg 160 220 220 145 221.4 282.1 6861.9 8167 82.8
A120 Germany 105 220 120 72 100 127.4 1361 2350 47.1
A150 Germany 150 220 150 80 150.3 191.4 4373 3605 72.7
CR 100 Japan 150 155 120 39 100.2 127.7 3270 1358.6 75.7
MRS 192 BHP 192 Luxemburg &
kg Australia 157.2 229 140 120 192 24452 5479 5979 71
GCR 108* France 100 263 123 123+ 108 137.66 1039 7301 49.6
GCR 183* France 120 280 150 150+ 183 234.2 2808 10544 53
QU 120 China 170 170 120 44 118.1 150.44 4923.79 1694.83 8.43
KP120 Russia 170 170 120 44 118.1 150.4 4923.8 1694.8 84.3
KP140 Russia 190 190 140 50 153.49 195.53 7427.23 2483.4 98.4
ISCR 120 India 170 170 120 44 118 151 4794 1672 86.9
ISCR140 India 170 170 140 60 147 187 5528 2609 87.5
* Rail with two equal heads of total width as shown in this table
There are a number of crane rails that are not frequently encountered either because they are no
longer rolled or they have special applications. The following drawing shows a few such sections.
Drawing 4: A number of rails from around the world that have been used in crane and railway
application but are either not readily available or are not widely used.
3. Comparison of rails
Crane makers design and specify all the details of their machines including the wheels. The factors
that affect the choice of rail are the wheel tread width that the crane maker has dictated, the diameter
of the wheel, the wheel load and the duty of the crane. As the crane maker normally defined the
diameter and tread width of the wheel, they often specify or suggest a crane rail. However they are
seldom responsible for the installation of the rail and thus are unlikely to be taking responsibility for the
rail. Thus it is sensible for the rail installer to consider what rail will be best in a particular application
and if necessary try to persuade the facility owner to change the crane maker’s recommendation.
The following table shows the rail head width versus the weight per metre for a number of crane rails
with 100 mm head width. Clearly the weight of the rail is indicative of the price but there may be other
technical or practical reasons for not using the cheapest. On this basis the lowest cost choice is at the
top of the table.
When a wheel applies a force to a continuously supported crane rail the rail is subject to compressive
and bending stresses below the wheel. The level of stress is dependant on the stiffness of the surface
supporting the rail. It follows that it is important to have a reasonable degree of bending resistance in
the rail section. If the rail is not continuously supported then it is also subject to beam bending
stresses. The vertical bending stresses can be determined using a formula, which includes the second
moment of area of the rail often known as Ixx. It can be seen in the table below that the A100 has the
lowest Ixx by a significant margin. Thus it is not a good rail for applications where the rail is not
continuously supported. On this basis the best choice is at the top of the table. It should be noted that
there is a warning in the German standard to warn that the A120 is weak in bending.
The following table shows examples of crane and railway rails. The ratio of head width to web
thickness is significantly higher for railway rails. The railway rails are shown in italics. While there are
many crane rail applications, using railway rails, the thin web of railway rails makes them less suitable
for such applications. This is not surprising as the highest railway wheel loads encountered in just a
few parts of the world are of the order 20 tonnes. If railway rails are to be used for crane applications
the allowable wheel load is probably of the order 30 tonnes with the largest railway rail sections. In
such applications a check should be made on the web stress. Gantrail use a calculation that has
proved safe. However there appears to be no published data giving an approved method.
Crane wheels are designed and specified using well established design rules. The Europe wide rules
are issued by FEM (Fédération Européenne de la Manutention = European Federation of Materials
Handling and Storage Equipment). The current methods used for determining the useful rail head
contact width are split into two separate categories, one for a flat rail head and another for a cambered
or curved rail head. All rails have a small radius at both corners of the head. Drawing 4 showed some
rails with flat heads and some with cambered heads.
Using these equations we can see the difference that is made by having a cambered rail head.
Consider the DIN standard A75 Rail which has a cambered head now but used to be made with a fault
head;
(1) 75 – (2 x 8) = 59 mm
(2) 75 – (4/3 x 8) = 64.3 mm
Thus the cambered rail head is considered to be 5.3 mm wider than the flat head. This means that the
subsequent calculations will allow a 9% increase in wheel load on a cambered head rail. In practice
the rail head is quickly flattened by the wheel and this advantage is not technically sound, particularly
when the rail is mounted on an flexible supporting pad such as Gantrail Mark 2 or Mark 7 pads.
Crane rails to German standard DIN 536 are supplied in two standard steel grades with tensile
strengths of 690 and 880 N/mm². Similar specifications are used in many other parts of the world. A
third grade of harder stronger rails of 1080 N/mm² strength is available but less common. This tends
to be known as a vanadium grade as it contains some of that element. In the USA they tend to use
less alloying elements and rely for strength on a high carbon content and heat treatment. American
rails were rolled by ArcelorMittal in both the USA and Europe, and basic information on some of these
grades is included in the table below.
The chemical composition of crane rails is important when they are to be welded. This will be covered
in more detail in another section of this book. The table below gives details of the composition of rails
supplied by ArcelorMittal. They are the largest makers of crane rails in Europe and possibly in the
world.
Chemical analysis (for information purposes)
The steel rail and steel wheel are the best combination for carrying very high forces over significant
distances. But the stress regime is complex. The subject has been extensively researched and one of
the first notable workers on the general subject of bodies in contact was Heinrich Hertz in the 1880s.
More recently there has been much work on railway rails and railway vehicle wheels. The following
images are from the paper ‘A systems approach to evaluating rail life by Jaiswal J., Blair S., Kay T.,
Bezin Y., Iwnicki S.D. of Rail Technology Unit, Manchester Metropolitan University.’ The one on the
left shows the stress patterns in a rail. It should be noted that the highest stress, the red, is below and
not at the surface of the rail. The one on the right shows the stress levels in a railway vehicle wheels.
The analysis has considerable similarities to the case of a crane rail and wheels. Again it will be seen
that the highest stresses are below the surface. These stresses account for one form of rail failure that
is occasionally seen. The surface layer of the rail becomes detached from the body of the rail to a
depth of perhaps 3 mm. It is this type of stress analysis which allows the rules for allowable wheel load
for cranes to be written.
4. Crane wheels
The function of the crane wheel is to transfer the vertical wheel load into the rail. This is normally the
highest force. They must also guide the crane along the rail. A number of methods of guidance are
used. Most cranes have wheels that have a flange on both sides of the rail. In some instances wheels
have only one flange to one side of the rail, as do typical railway vehicle wheels. Some cranes have
no flanges on the wheels but rely on guide rollers to steer the crane. These are typically a short
distance ahead of and behind the main wheel. The horizontal force that is carried by the wheel can be
up to 20% of the vertical force. Crane design codes set rules for the tread width of the wheel and
hence the width of the head of rails for a given vertical load. In the same equation are the wheel load,
wheel diameter and two coefficients, one related to the duty of the crane the other for the wheel
material strength.
The clearance between the wheel and the rail is not defined in rules and a wide range of values can be
found. One crane maker has said that they use a figure of between 10 and 20%. It will be seen from
the photographs below that the range can be greater.
The design of crane wheels in Europe is defined in the FEM rules. These are similar in their
requirements to a number of national standards including those of Germany and Britain. The standard
is copyright and cannot be reproduced fully here. Two requirements must be met. A mean wheel load
is defined from three loading conditions of the crane. The rail head width is then determined using the
wheel diameter, the wheel metal strength, the effective rail head width and two coefficients. The range
of wheel strengths covered is 500 to 1000 N/mm. The coefficients fall in the ranges 100% to 177%
and 100% and 156%. It is seldom possible for those involved with the installation of crane rails to
have enough data to be able to complete these calculations. Thus they must accept the requirement
of the crane maker. However it is sensible to carry out a quick check on the suitability of the crane rail
head width. It is then possible to suggest the most suitable cross section and steel grade of rail to be
considered.
The simplest method for carrying out a quick check of rail head width is as follows. Allow 2.5 mm head
width per tonne for vertical wheel load for heavy-duty cranes. Allow 1.7 mm for normal and light-duty
cranes. These two guides make a number of assumptions including that the ratio of rail head width to
crane wheel diameter is typical for the industry.
The horizontal force that the wheel applies to the rail is given in the design rules. The FEM Rules give
the force in the range 5% to 20% of the vertical wheel load depending on the span of the crane across
the building to the wheelbase along the rail. Other standards have more detailed methods of
calculation but unpublished work suggests that these approaches may be simplifications.
Before discussing the hardness of wheels it is worth commenting briefly on the relationship between
hardness and tensile strength. Harder materials have a higher tensile strength. There are tables
giving conversions between these two properties. However they need to be used with caution, as in
tests there is less consistency than might be implied. Work hardening at the head of a rail can result in
higher hardnesses and as consequent over estimates the tensile strength. This is particularly
important in the case of rails. The carbon and manganese content of the rails typically are high and
these are the main element in the work hardening of rails. The table below gives some sample
comparisons of hardness and tensile strength in units used in most of the world and in the USA.
In the FEM Rules table T.9.12.a gives a range of wheel tensile strengths from 500 to 1000 N/mm2 in
intervals of 100 N/mm2. The highest of these values are far from the highest encountered.
The American market has developed independently to most of the rest of the world. There were two
main rail sources, Bethlehem and US Steel. Both had sections with 2 ½ (61 mm) and 4 inch (102 mm)
heads, one also had a 3 inch head rail. However they often use higher strength grade sections (up to
350 BHN or 1170 N/mm2) and much harder crane wheels with hardness of 60 Rockwell number. Care
needs to be taken if American origin cranes are to be used on other than American rails.
This section of the book discusses some of the main applications of crane rails in industry. It tries to
outline some of the special considerations that must be taken into account when choosing a crane rail
and in designing the rail installation. Gantrail are always pleased to expand on what is presented here.
5.1.1 Steelworks
cranes normally encountered in any industry for the moving of ladles filled with molten metal. They are
sometimes known as electric overhead travelling cranes (EOT). Rails with 120 to 150 mm head are
used (102mm in the USA) and the cranes move slowly. The beams of the cranes across the bay are
large enough and the wheel loads are such that the cross travel are significant rail installations. The
cranes in the mill areas are some of the most arduous applications in all industry. Rails typically have
100 mm head width. The cranes are relatively high span across the building bay but quite short
wheelbase. This ratio determines the proportion of vertical wheel load that is considered to apply
horizontally to the rails perpendicular to their length. The FEM Rules give a range of 5% to 20%.
Unpublished research work undertaken at a university in South Africa has suggested that the figures
can be higher if the rails are out of alignment or the cranes are not running true. Due to the high duty
and high loads the Gantrail type 9 clips are normally used in conjunction with Gantrail Mark 7
continuous steel reinforced pad below the rail. There are other buildings in steelworks for other
processes, workshops and other duties. These have cranes that are less taxing on the rail system.
arduous application for the container crane is the rail installation that allows the trolley to pass from
landward onto the boom and over the ship. Every container movement requires the rail to pass over
the centre of this and it includes a joint which allows the hinge to be lifted for berthing of vessels.
These rails typically have 75 or 100 mm head width. Gantrail type 9 clips are normally used in
conjunction with Gantrail Mark 7 continuous steel reinforced pad below the rail. Other rail mounted
cranes are often used at container terminals and ports. The storages yard for containers may have rail
mounted cranes and these may be mounted on concrete beams or sleepers. There is often a
container handling facility for taking containers from the in-port, pneumatic wheeled tugs to a railway
wagon. Typically these will have concrete beams embedded in the ground on which the tracks are
mounted.
cranes can be removed from the track and serviced away from the area of the pot room. This often
results in a requirement for very low longitudinal forces in the rail. Gantrail have supplied a number of
solutions with modified type 9 clips to meet these requirements. The rails used tend to be to DIN 536
A sections. Gantrail type 9 clips are normally used in conjunction with Gantrail Mark 7 continuous
steel reinforced pad below the rail. There are other buildings in aluminium plants for carbon anode
handling, workshops and other duties. These have cranes that are less taxing on the rail system.
rails are more suitable as they can be mounted on discontinuous supports along the concrete ground
beam. The machines move quite slowly and they are relatively square in the plan of their wheels.
Hence they are not aggressive to the rail tracks. With discontinuously supported rails Gantrail type 3
clips are normally used in conjunction with Gantrail Mark 2 elastomeric pad below the rail.
supported on high quality non-shrink grout. In some instances it is arranged that the spacing of the
pads or discontinuous supports, is a whole number division of the crane wheelbase. With
discontinuously supported rails Gantrail type 3 clips are normally used in conjunction with Gantrail
Mark 2 elastomeric pad below the rail.
weigh around 250 tonnes these cranes have a significant lift that they perform infrequently. But the
nuclear industry is rightly very quality and reliability conscious. Thus installing crane rails in such
environments requires a great deal of verification, inspection and integrity checking. This inevitably
adds to installation costs. Due to the high integrity required the Gantrail type 9 clips are normally used
in conjunction with Gantrail Mark 7 continuous steel reinforced pad below the rail.
Relatively few countries undertake nuclear reprocessing and the number of processes differ from
facility to facility. However it is common for the fuel for power stations to be transported in strong
heavily reinforced casks that protect from radioactive exposure. Other activities require a range of
lifting operations. The cranes do not tend to move quickly and the original design is cautious and
conservative. However there are some special considerations. Some buildings cannot be entered
after they have been commissioned. This means that cranes must be used to access them and
accurately pick items from store. The design life for such plants must be up to 100 years. As radiation
can cause changes to organic materials it is not common to allow rubber, plastics, polymer and epoxy
grout in areas that are subject to high radiation. Due to the high integrity required the Gantrail type 9
clips are normally used in conjunction with Gantrail Mark 7 continuous steel reinforced pad below the
rail for many areas of the plant. In active cells pads are not used and the clips have the rubber
member omitted.
Cement is made from lime bearing material, normally limestone. This is quarried and transported in
vehicles and on conveyors. However it is stacked and blended in bulk facilities which are covered
elsewhere in this book. There are applications for cranes in some plants. In some works the clinker
from the furnace is placed in bunkers and then recovered with grabbing cranes before being fed into
crushers. This is a most arduous application and in some countries the customer demands concrete
structures be used in keeping with the industry. The wheel loads are not necessarily very high and
rails with 100 mm head are typically used. Due to the high duty and harsh environment the Gantrail
type 9 clips are normally used in conjunction with Gantrail Mark 7 continuous steel reinforced pad
below the rail.
Once a vessel is completed it is transferred to the water and lowered into it at a ship lift. These have a
platform supported by rows of winches to each side. The vessel is slowly lowered into the water.
Such facilities are used for commercial vessels and military craft such as submarines. The rails on the
shiplift are often fixed with clips that are more solid in construction and clamp the rail in position.
installations are being made. The sewage is normally piped to the plant where it passes through a
course filter system. It then passes into settlement tanks where solids settle to the bottom over a set
period of time. The liquid then passes on to other process equipment. The settlement tanks need to
be scraped so that the solids can be taken to one end concentrated and extracted for further
processing. Tanks are typically rectangular and have a wheel-mounted bridge over them. This needs
to be driven with a force greater than can be achieved by friction between the
wheels and rail. There are several driving systems in ascending order of sophistication and
effectiveness. Rope operation was used but is now more normally replaced with a peg track system.
Here there is a light railway type rail to take the wheel load and then a parallel track formed from ‘U’
shaped folded metal with circular dowels at close intervals. A sprocket on the machine drives against
this track.
More sophisticated still are systems using rack and pinion with properly formed gear teeth on a bar
beside the rail and a gear wheel on the machine. The benefit of these systems is that the pushing
effort can be greater with increased sophistication and hence the output of the given concrete tank can
be maximised. The rails are typically mounted on discrete sole plates and fixed with Gantrail type 3
clips. Gantrail Mark 2 pads are used below the rail. At a later stage in the process the contaminated
water may be trickled slowly through a bed of coke or plastic shapes. The large surface area of these
allows air and oxygen to act on the water. These beds may be round or rectangular and may have
relatively light rail mounted distributors systems. The rails are railway type and are discontinuously
mounted. Gantrail type 3 clips and Mark 2 pads are appropriate for this application.
For Gantrail to be able to effectively support our customers, it is important to know the industry and the
application of the crane. In the table above the group classification 8 is indicative of the heaviest duty.
There are two other factors that are important in the design of cranes and also in understanding the
duty that a crane rail system must endure. It is important to know the hours of operation that a crane
will experience or more particularly the number of lifts that it will undertake. It is also important to know
the number of times it will be lifting the maximum load for which it has been designed. As far as the
crane rail installation is concerned the general rule is that Gantrail type 9 clips are stronger and used
for the most arduous applications.
The purpose of this book is to give a considerable amount of detail about crane rails and their
application. The business of fixing crane rails is the prime activity of Gantrail. Thus it would take up
too much of this volume and unbalance it if it were to cover the area completely. However it needs
introduction. Beyond this introduction there is the web site at www.gantrail.com where considerably
more information and guidance will be found. Thus this section will be limited to a table, which acts as
a flow chart for the decisions that must be made in designing an installation. This is followed with
drawings of typical arrangements of rails mounted on steel and concrete.
Drawing 5: Details of a medium duty crane rail installation on a rolled steel girder.
Drawing 6: Details of a heavy duty crane rail installation on a continuous steel sole plate on a concrete
beam.
Drawing 7: Details of a medium duty crane rail installation on discontinuous steel sole plates on
concrete.
Crane rails are typically supplied in 10 or 12 metre lengths but cranes run best on continuous rails.
For crane applications it is possible to join railway and some crane rails with splice bars. These bars
are readily obtainable for railway rails but not necessarily for crane rails. The best solution for crane
rails is to weld the joint and this book will only consider that solution in detail.
Crane rails are made from hard steels, which contain high percentages of carbon and other elements
that make welding more difficult. Thus the choice of rail, steel or strength grade and welding process
are important in installing a crane rail installation. All crane rail welds should fuse the full cross
sectional area of the rail. Partial penetration welds almost always fail early in their service life.
Full details of rail steels are covered in more details earlier in this book. Rails steels have carbon
contents, which are very much higher than steels used for most other engineering purposes. Thus the
welding techniques and consumables have developed to meet these needs. The key information
required before welding rail is the carbon equivalent. This is given by the following formula.
Mn Cr +Mo + V Ni + Cu
Carbon equivalent (CE) = C + —— + —————— + ——-—
6 5 15
Where the elements are
C Carbon
Mn Manganese
Cr Chromium
Mo Molybdenum
V Vanadium
Ni Nickel
Cu Copper
Structural steel has a maximum CE of 0.54 %. The weakest grade of crane rail steel has carbon
content in the range 0.40 to 0.60 %. The welding techniques and methods take account of this by
using a high preheat temperature. They also allow the rails to be joined with square cut ends, which is
clearly the cheapest from of preparation.
Puddle Arc Welding was developed by Philips Welding, probably in the 1950’s. The method was
developed as a means for joining any large cross section steel items together. The welding of crane
rails became a particular application, which is now a specialist area. In the method the two rail ends to
be joined are cut square and placed about 20 mm apart. The base of the rail at the gap has a copper
strip placed beneath it and a mild steel strip of 16 mm by 3 mm section is placed on the copper. This
strip prevents the arc of the welding process striking on the copper. The strip is fully melted in the
welding process and becomes alloyed with the weld metal. Thus the composition of the strip is not
important, providing it does not contain significant impurities. The welding process uses large diameter
electrodes (5 or 6 mm) and a high current to fill the majority of the gap. The process is to strike the arc
on the rail ends and to melt the electrode and rail into a puddle of weld metal, which is covered with
liquid slag, derived from the coating on the electrode. As the steel of the rail and characteristics of the
flux are both very different from other welding processes, special electrodes have been developed for
this process. While it is possible to use some conventional low hydrogen electrodes for puddle arc
welding, it is discouraged. The gap between the rail ends is filled in two stages normally. The foot of
the rail is first welded. This is done run by run with the slag being chipped off after each run. Following
this the remainder of the weld is completed. To prevent the puddle of weld metal and flux from flowing
away from the weld, copper mould pieces are placed either side of the weld. The welding is stopped
about 10 mm from the top of the head to allow the rail to cool to the weld preheat temperature. It is
then continued to above the head of the rail. After cooling it is ground back to form the final running
surface for the crane wheel. This pause in the welding allows the upper layer of weld to attain a higher
hardness then fully annealed material.
The precise procedure for puddle arc welding rails needs to be specified on the basis of the rail steel
and the application details. The rail ends must be placed at a small angle to each other, (in the vertical
plane). This is to allow for distortion due to shrinkage of the weld metal. The ends of the rails must be
pre-heated to a temperature dependant on the carbon content of the steel. Some electrodes are not
suitable for some carbon contents. Gantrail can supply draft procedures. The completed weld may
need to be cooled under controlled conditions, i.e. insulated with a thermal blanket, depending on rail
steel composition.
Puddle arc welds are never perfect. It is normal to entrain some slag and to have a limited degree of
lack of fusion or undercut at the bottom. They cannot be inspected easily thus it is wise to agree the
quality control standards for production welds before work starts. The agreed standard should be
based on trial welds or past experience.
In aluminothermic welding a refractory sand mould is placed around the two square cut rails ends. The
gap between the rail ends is about 30 mm. The rail is preheated to a temperature dependant on the
chemical composition of the rail and the precise welding process. A crucible containing a combustible
powder, iron and alloying elements is placed above the mould. The powder is ignited and when it
attains the correct temperature, it melts a plug and flows into the mould. On completion of the weld and
solidification of the steel the mould is broken away and the runners and risers are removed either
manually or by means of a special shearing machine. The cooling and post weld heat treatment of the
rail are chosen dependant on the rail material and the application.
Both the aluminothermic and puddle arc processes are suitable methods for welding most grades of
crane rails. The choice of method is normally dependant on local factors. Puddle arc is cheaper on its
use of consumables. Aluminothermic welding is quicker per joint. As there are normally two men to an
aluminothermic welding team, the manpower requirements of the two processes are similar. Thus
overall puddle arc is cheaper. In some cases, aluminothermic welding is considered to be potentially
too dangerous to be undertaken above ground level. Puddle Arc is the most economical process for a
small number of welds.
The weld metal quality of aluminothermic welds is of high integrity compared with puddle arc welds.
However, the performance of the two systems are both adequate as the fracture resistance of puddle
arc weld metals may be higher than that of aluminothermic.
Flash butt welding is commonly used for railway rail welding in steel mills before shipment. It is also
used on site for railway rails. It requires thousands of amps current and hence heavy equipment. The
rail ends are heated while in contact and when they are hot enough they are forged together. The
process is used for crane rail welding on site in North America but it has not found much application in
other parts of the world.
9. Contact Gantrail
We are committed to delivering outstanding service to all of our clients and partners worldwide and we
are always happy to provide technical support and advice on your projects.
Please contact us with your enquiry and we will be delighted to assist you.
Email: info@gantrail.com
Web: www.gantrail.com
Gantrail Contacts:
Acknowledgements:
Gantrail would like to express their thanks for the significant amount of work undertaken in the
preparation and provision of this Rail Book.
• Warwick Faville
• Union Railtrack
• Arcelor Mittal
• Earl & Thompson Marketing
We would also like to acknowledge external parties whom have not been specifically
referenced throughout the document but whose available information has been used as
reference.
We look forward to developing The Rail Book in line with the needs and requirements of our
customers and partners worldwide. If you have any comments or suggestions regarding The
Rail Book including feedback on its further development please email technical@gantrail.com.