Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
What is Product Design? Explain why the engineering design process cannot easily be assigned as a
1
common scheme to product design.
Due to great variety of possible design situations, the engineering design process cannot
easily be assigned to a common scheme. To explain this variety, product design process is
distinguished with the principal categories of design intervention as follows.
Creative design — This typology only includes design studies constrained by specific
requirements such as functionality, performance and producibility with no specifications
regarding the transformation of the idea into product or the realm of possible solutions.
Sol Innovative design — In this case, the overall design problem and its possible decomposition
into simpler sub problems is already known. Intervention then consists of synthesizing the
possible alternatives for each constructional sub unit, and can be reduced to a simple
originative combination of pre existing components.
Redesign — This category includes interventions altering and improving pre existing designs.
This is necessary when a product does not fully meet the prescribed requirements or when
changes in the environmental context for which the product was destined produce new on the
market.
Routine design — In this case, different characteristic design factors such as the form of the
product, the method of design approach, and the production system are all known before the
design process begins.
Product Life Cycle Management: Module 2 Hemanth Kumar C
The process of engineering design is also characterized by certain aspects. Foremost among all of
these is the evolutionary nature of the process, which is generally characterized as: An underlying
pattern or paradigm consisting of the three phases: analysis–synthesis–evaluation.
Analysis allows the definition and comprehension of the problem and its translation into
The phase of development process planning consists of the decomposition, planning, and
distribution of all the activities, resources, and information involved in the entire process
under consideration.
Figure graphically depicts the relationship of problem decomposition and system
integration.
Sol
One important level of integration takes place within each development team. This is the now
common practice of concurrent engineering, in which a cross-functional team addresses the
many design and production concerns simultaneously. However, to assure that the entire
system works together, the many sub-system development teams must work together. This
latter form of integration is often called system engineering.
The product design process involves transforming information from the state where it
describes and characterizes a product demand (needs, constraints, consumer requirements,
market conditions, available technology) to a state where it fully describes the technical systems
able to satisfy the initial demand.
This process of transformation is achieved through the use of various types of resources
(cognitive, human, economic and material) that fuel the main phases of the design process.
Sol
Phases of design at different levels (concept, system, detail) and of assessment, making up
Product Life Cycle Management: Module 2 Hemanth Kumar C
Problem Specification— In this phase all the information relative to the project in question is
elaborated to develop and define the requisites that must characterize the product.
Information describing the needs to be satisfied, the consumer requirements, the market
conditions, and the company strategies must be clarified (and integrated, if necessary) and
used to generate the specifications that will guide the subsequent design phases.
Embodiment Design— Having identified the most appropriate concept, the next phase is the
preliminary interpretation of the design idea in a physical system. The concepts formulated in
the previous phases are developed, their feasibility is verified, and finally they are translated
into a general product layout that defines subsystems and functional components. This phase
also includes a preliminary study of the shape of the components and a first selection of
materials.
Detail Design—The layout developed in the previous phases must be translated into
geometric models and detailed designs. This requires the application of methods and tools
aiding a correct definition of the design details. The choice of materials, study of the shapes,
definition of the geometry of components and assemblies, and the development of the
assembly sequences and definition of the junction systems must all be guided by the entire
range of product requirements (performance, economic, environmental, etc.)
{Note: To complete this phase, some authors provide for the comprehensive planning of the production process
(Ulrich and Eppinger, 2000), while others suggest including instructions for production, assembly, shipping, and
use in the final documentation (Pahl and Beitz)}
Product Life Cycle Management: Module 2 Hemanth Kumar C
Figure shows the importance of the evaluation phase at the base of each iteration of the
design process. This phase evaluates the degree to which the proposed solution corresponds to the
design specifications defined in the problem specification phase, and guides modifications and
improvements that can make the process evolve toward the definitive solution (i.e., the product
that best satisfies the desired requisites).
With this aim, it is necessary to analyze the critical aspects of the design in order to predict
how the chosen solution will behave over time in relation to environmental factors (socioeconomic
conditions, consumer tastes, competing offers, availability of raw materials).
Technological factors (technological progress, deterioration in performance) and
verification programs (modeling, initial prototyping) must also be incorporated. Among the
verification techniques, modeling to evaluate product performance assumes a particularly
important role.
This usually consists of the simplest method (analytical, physical, and graphical) to compare
the detailed solution with the engineering targets, generally on the basis of numerical values. A
high-quality solution must be as robust as possible (i.e., such that its performance is not affected
by disturbance factors).
The consequent increase in the level of complexity of the design problem, have revealed the
inadequacy of the sequential it is, in fact, limited by two types of disadvantages:
Sol Prolonged development times due to the sequential nature of the different functions.
Limited capacity for product improvement because of the poor communication between the
various functions and the consequently reduced and fragmentary information flows.
The product design and development models described above, initially characterized by rigidly
Sol sequential structures, must therefore be inserted in new methodological contexts that provide for
design actions of analysis and synthesis that are simultaneous and in close interaction, in relation
Product Life Cycle Management: Module 2 Hemanth Kumar C
The sequential model thus evolves into the simultaneous/integrated product development
model shown in Figure. In this model, the phases of process development planning, product design,
production–consumption cycle planning, and results evaluation are fused in a single, simultaneous
intervention that draws information from a shared source and takes into account a wide variety of
aspects (functionality, producibility, reliability, and cost).
Design for X (DFX) — involves a flexible system of design methodologies and tools, each
directed at the attainment of a particular product requirement.
Life Cycle Design (LCD) — extends the field of design analysis to the entire life cycle of the
product, from the production and use of materials to disposal.
Importance
Sol
Concurrent Engineering, also called Simultaneous Engineering, developed in response to
this need. It is directed at reconciling an increase in product quality with a reduction in
development times and costs.
Highlighting the role of production process planning and its influence on the decisions of
the product design process.
Sol
Emphasizing the multidisciplinary dimension of the design team engaged in the product
development process.
Figure Compares the structure of the traditional process of product development (sequential in
nature) with that of a simultaneous or concurrent development process.
It should be noted, however, that the integrated approach leads to an increase in the complexity
of the design problem, which may itself prolong development times. The primary objective of CE
is, therefore, to reconcile this increased complexity, due to the level of integration between
design and other company functions (principally that of manufacturing) with the control and
reduction of the times and costs of development and production.
As well as through simultaneous design and development activities, shorter development times
can also be obtained through a more efficient design intervention, with a consequent reduction in
the number of corrective iterations necessary for the design process to converge on the optimal
solution.
The need to eliminate the barriers separating the main company functions, the principle of
integrating design and production is one of the fundamental precepts of CE. In practice, this is
achieved through the creation of multidisciplinary teams whose members are experts in different
company functions; for this reason they are called cross-functional teams.
Product Life Cycle Management: Module 2 Hemanth Kumar C