WHEN PERFORMANCE &

PRODUCTIVITY MATTER:
IMAGERUNNER ADVANCE

✓ EASE OF USE
✓ EFFICIENT SCANNING
✓ PRODUCTIVE PRINT SPEEDS
 PRINT PRODUCTIVITY

WHICH MANUFACTURER PRINTS FASTER? HOW IS CANON FASTER?

PDF
PDF Third Generation imageRUNNER ADVANCE models are
(when printing a duplex 50-page [39.5MB] full colour document) equipped with a controller that uses a unique image process-
ing technology to integrate an advanced ‘system-on-chip’
with a high speed and high performance CPU.
When using the PCL print driver, PDF files print 41% faster on the
Canon Color imageRUNNER ADVANCE C5535i compared to the
Konica Minolta bizhub C368.†
When using the PCL print driver, PDF files print 16% faster on the
Canon Color imageRUNNER ADVANCE C5535i compared to the The main controller handles system control; while the
Ricoh MP C3504 (2GB RAM). accelerator is dedicated to image processing.
When using the PCL print driver, PDF files print 42% faster on the
Canon Color imageRUNNER ADVANCE C5535i compared to the These controllers help to achieve high speed:
Xerox WorkCentre 7835i. ✓ System control
✓ Image processing
✓ User interface response time
✓ Connections with accessories

PRINT PRODUCTIVITY
SPEED TEST RESULTS

PDF PDF DOCX Microsoft Word

(when printing a 50-page [39.5MB] full colour document) (when printing a 30-page [171KB] full colour document)

Canon Ricoh MP Ricoh MP Canon Ricoh MP Ricoh MP

Xerox Xerox
Color iR Konica Minolta C3504 C3504 Color iR Konica Minolta C3504 C3504
Print Driver WorkCentre Print Driver WorkCentre
ADVANCE bizhub C368 (2GB (4GB ADVANCE bizhub C368 (2GB (4GB
7835i 7835i
C5535i RAM) RAM) C5535i RAM) RAM)

SIMPLEX SIMPLEX

UFRII 98.7 sec. N/A N/A N/A N/A UFRII 62.9 sec. N/A N/A N/A N/A

PCL 99.2 sec. 98.0 sec. 120.1 sec. 121.5 sec. 175.9 sec. PCL 63.6 sec. 62.8 sec. 60.8 sec. 65.0 sec. 64.5 sec.

PS 99.3 sec. 95.4 sec. 94.0 sec. 98.6 sec. 101.1 sec. PS 62.9 sec. 64.4 sec. 65.0 sec. 62.9 sec. 65.4 sec.

DUPLEX DUPLEX

UFRII 105.5 sec. N/A N/A N/A N/A UFRII 124.0 sec. N/A N/A N/A N/A

PCL 106.8 sec. 180.5 sec. 128.0 sec. 125.0 sec. 185.5 sec. PCL 121.7 sec. 122.4 sec. 119.7 sec. 118.5 sec. 118.7 sec.

PS 106.5 sec. 175.7 sec. 131.0 sec. 129.5 sec. 105.5 sec. PS 120.8 sec. 123.4 sec. 122.1 sec. 120.1 sec. 124.9 sec.

PPTX Microsoft PowerPoint

(when printing a 41-page [9.5MB] full colour presentation)

Canon Ricoh MP Ricoh MP

Xerox
Color iR Konica Minolta C3504 C3504
Print Driver WorkCentre
ADVANCE bizhub C368 (2GB (4GB
7835i
C5535i RAM) RAM)

SIMPLEX

UFRII 84.8 sec. N/A N/A N/A N/A

PCL 88.3 sec. 86.1 sec. 86.4 sec. 86.2 sec. 119.5 sec.

PS 85.4 sec. 122.5 sec. 152.7 sec. 150.4 sec. 91.3 sec.

DUPLEX

UFRII 94.3 sec. N/A N/A N/A N/A

PCL 94.3 sec. 133.0 sec. 88.2 sec. 90.9 sec. 131.5 sec.

PS 93.9 sec. 185.0 sec. 193 sec. 196.0 sec. 96.0 sec.
 SCAN EFFICIENCY

WHICH MANUFACTURER COMPRESSES SCANNED WHAT DOES STANDARD SCAN

FILES THE SMALLEST? COMPRESSION MEAN TO YOU?

When scanning a 25-page single-sided marketing document, the ✓ Reduced email attachment file sizes
compression of the Canon Color imageRUNNER ADVANCE C5535i at ✓ Faster downloading/loading speeds
300 dpi is 3.96 times (75%) smaller than the Konica Minolta bizhub ✓ Minimize digital storage space
C368 at 200 dpi.† †

When scanning a 25-page single-sided marketing document, the

compression of the Canon Color imageRUNNER ADVANCE C5535i at
300 dpi is 4.46 times (77%) smaller than the Ricoh MP C3504 (2GB
RAM) at 200 dpi.

When scanning a 25-page single-sided Text/Graphics document, the

compression of the Canon imageRUNNER ADVANCE C5535i at 300 Best of all, with Canon imageRUNNER ADVANCE, you’ll
dpi is equivalent (2.8MB) to that of the Xerox WorkCentre 7835i at be scanning with higher quality (300 dpi) by default -
200dpi. without the large file sizes!

SCAN EFFICIENCY
SCAN COMPRESSION RESULTS

PDF

PDF: What were the file sizes?

Canon Color Xerox

Konica Minolta Ricoh MP
iR ADVANCE WorkCentre
bizhub C368 C3504
C5535i 7835i

Scan Resolution 300 dpi 200 dpi 200 dpi 200 dpi

POWERPOINT SLIDE

1 page 29 KB 126 KB 127 KB 16 KB

5 pages 145 KB 650 KB 691 KB 122 KB

PowerPoint Slide
25 pages 720 KB 3.3 MB 3.5 MB 690KB

100 pages 2.9 MB 13.0 MB 13.8 MB 2.4 MB

MARKETING DOCUMENT

1 page 114 KB 445 KB 502 KB 107 KB

5 pages 562 KB 2.2 MB 2.5 MB 558 KB

25 pages 2.8 MB 11.1 MB 12.5 MB 2.8 MB

100 pages 11.2 MB 44.2 MB 50 MB 11.1 MB Marketing Document

FULL TEXT DOCUMENT

1 page 71 KB 452 KB 50 KB 35 KB

5 pages 337 KB 2.2 MB 247 KB 172 KB

25 pages 1.7 MB 11.2 MB 1.2 MB 860 KB

100 pages 6.7 MB 44.6 MB 4.9 MB 3.4 MB Full Text Document

ABOUT THE PRINT/SCAN PERFORMANCE & PRODUCTIVITY STUDY
In Q3-2016, Canon Canada Inc. partnered with third-party market research organization, Industry Analysts Inc. (IA, Inc.) to conduct comparative performance
and productivity testing; evaluating print speed and scan compression of the Canon imageRUNNER ADVANCE C5535i (compared to comparable Konica
Minolta, Ricoh, and Xerox multifunction copiers). The four models used for this market research study were: Canon Color imageRUNNER ADVANCE C5535i,
Konica Minolta bizhub C368, Ricoh Aficio MP C3504, and Xerox WorkCentre 7835i. The devices were selected based on their 35 (or comparable) page per
minute rated colour print speed and were each configured with PCL and PostScript print drivers for comparative purposes. Testing was conducted by Andy
Slawetsky, President of Industry Analysts, Inc. between September 20 and September 23, 2016. Results included in this marketing document are based on
a final testing report (dated December 10, 2016), which was prepared by Industry Analysts. Replicating these jobs using the embedded files may result in
times that vary by as much as 2-3 seconds. Results may also vary based on the computer hardware and/or software versions used.

† This claim was calculated using the following formula: Konica Minolta PCL Print Driver Time (180.5 seconds) minus the Canon PCL Print Driver Print Time (106.8 seconds), then
divided by the Konica Minolta PCL Print Driver Time (180.5 seconds), the result is that the Canon device is 41% faster when printing a duplex 50-page full colour PDF (file size: 39.5
MB).

† † This claim was calculated using the following formula: Konica Minolta scanned file size (11.1 MB) divided by Canon scanned filed size (2.8 MB), results in the Canon scanned file
size being 3.96 times smaller than the Konica Minolta scanned file size when scanning a 25-page marketing document. Comparatively, when calculating Konica Minolta scanned file
size (11.1 MB) minus the Canon scanned file size (2.8 MB), then divided by the Konica Minolta scanned file size (11.1 MB), the result is that the Canon scanned file size is 75% smaller
when scanning a 25-page marketing document.

ABOUT INDUSTRY ANALYSTS INC. (IA, Inc.)

Industry Analysts, Inc. (IA, Inc.) is a market research, product-testing and training firm focused on the print and imaging industry. Since 1973, IA Inc. has
helped keep manufacturers and resellers up to date on critical news, product information and industry trends. IA Inc. specializes in hardware/software test-
ing and analysis, customer/end-user studies, focus groups, and strategic consulting. www.industryanalysts.com

As an ENERGY STAR® Partner, Canon U.S.A., Inc. has determined that these products meet the ENERGY STAR guidelines for energy efficiency. ENERGY STAR
and the ENERGY STAR mark are registered marks in Canada. CANON, IMAGERUNNER, and MEAP are registered trademarks of Canon Inc. in Canada and may
also be registered trademarks or trademarks in other countries. All other referenced product names and marks are trademarks of their respective owners and
are hereby acknowledged. Some items may not be available at this time; please check for availability. All printer output images are simulated. Products are
shown with optional accessories. Specifications and availability subject to change without notice.

© 2017 Canon Canada Inc. All rights reserved.

“The Canon Color imageRUNNER ADVANCE

C5535i defaults to 300 x 300 dpi scanning
compared to the default setting of 200 x
200 dpi… the better image quality of the
Canon provides a significant advantage over
the Xerox model. Canon’s file sizes are also
significantly smaller than those from the
Ricoh and Konica Minolta models.”

- Andy Slawetsky
(Industry Analysts, Inc.)
www.canon.ca/simple

0207W495