LG Gec8

CHRIST THE KING COLLEGE
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Name of Teacher: Edgar Ian L. Canete Subject: GEC 8 Schedule: MTH 10:30 am – 12:00 pm
4 Pronged Integration
Time Concept Learning Learning Core
Content Objectives Assessment Values/ Social Across Scriptural Materials
Allotment Generalization Outcomes Activities
Related Orientation Discipline Text
Values
Week 1 Class Discuss the Recognizing the Students should Getting to Group ICV Hazing Criminal Psalm 82: White
Orientation foundations of notions of right be able to: know activity discussion Faith Justice 3-4 board
3 hours -House Rules moral valuation and wrong, and Cris System marker
-Grading and different good or bad are Identify the Case analysis Lecture Anthony Defend the
System approaches to the primary ethical aspect of RV Mendez’s Law lowly and Eraser
-Requirements study and learn concern of human life and Justice case fatherless;
-School’s ethics ethics. the scope the render Projector,
vision, contextualized in scope of ethical justice to
mission, goals, contemporary thinking. the afflicted
objectives, and Filipino and needy.
philosophy experience. Define and Rescue the
explain the terms lowly and
Course Reiterate the that are relevant poor; deliver
Orientation rules they have to ethical thinking; them from
- Definition of to follow. and the hand of
ethics the wicked
-Kinds of Evaluate the
valuation difficulties that
-Ethics and are involved in
morals maintaining
certain
commonly-held
notions on ethics.
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Name of Teacher: Edgar Ian L. Canete Subject: GEC 8 ETHICS Schedule: MTH 10:30 am – 12:00 pm
Content Objectives Assessment Materials
Allotment Generalization Outcomes Activities Values/ Social Across Scriptural
Values
Week 2 Kinds of Identify the Ethics is a Determine Case Group CV Private Business John 16: White
Valuation ethical aspect study instances of value analysis discussion Faith information Management 33 board
November of human life determining the making judgments regulations marker
19, 2018 Ethics and and the scope grounds for the that are not Pen and Lecture RV I have
Morals of ethical values with considered to be Paper test Prophetic told you Eraser
1.5 hours thinking; particular and part of ethics. witness to this so
Descriptive special Gospel that you Topic
and Define and significance to Apply ethical values might hand-out
Normative explain the human life. decision-making have
terms that are on sample ethical peace in Photocopy
Ethics and relevant to dilemma cases. me. In of sample
morals ethical the world cases
thinking; you will
have
Distinguish a trouble
situation which but take
calls for moral courage,
valuation. I have
conquere
d the
world.
Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by: ______________________________

9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Name of Teacher: Edgar Ian L. Canete Subject: GEC 8 ETHICS Schedule: MTH 10:30 am – 12:00 pm
Time Concept Learning Learning
Content Objectives Assessment Core Values/ Materials
Allotment Generalization Outcomes Activities Social Across Scriptural
Related
Orientation Discipline Text
Values
Week 2 Reasoning To identify the Man holds a Identify moral Case analysis Case ICV Abortion Sociology Proverbs Topic print
sources of rationally issues in Analysis Excellence 10:16 out
November Sources of authority in our established relation to the Essay and Prostitution
22, 2018 Authority: moral valuation grounds by sources of reflection paper Question RV “The Manila
which one authority in on moral issues and Answer Integrity reward of paper
1.5 hours Religion Determine the justifies and moral in different doing good
Law advantages maintains valuation. sources of Spoken is life, but White
Culture and her/his moral authority Exam sin leads board
disadvantages decision and Formulate only to marker
of the different judgments ways to more sins.”
sources of resolve Eraser
authority in differences in
moral valuation law, religion LDC
and culture
through Laptop
coming up
with a moral
framework.
Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by: ______________________________

9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 3 Subjectivis Explain how the The individual Formulate Written Quiz Group work ICV Abortion Psychology Titus 2:7 Bond
m self or ego with thinking guidelines to Excellence Paper
1.5 its desires and person determine the right Valuation on Case Analysis Prostitution Personality
Psychologic interests, is (subject) is at valuation based on cases with RV Development White
al Egoism considered as the heart of all one’s own ends ethical Integrity board
the underlying moral and interests issues marker
Ethical dynamic behind valuation.
Egoism all human Eraser
actions.
LCD
Laptop
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 3 Cultural Discuss the A person's Enumerate the Written test Lecture ICV Pre-marital Sociology Romans Topic hand
relativism concept of beliefs, values, obligations the Faith sex 15:1 out
1.5 cultural and practices students are Case Group work Anthropol
relativism and should be expected to fulfil, Analysis RV Eating of ogy Case
formulate understood prohibitions Case Analysis Communio foetus analysis
principles to based on that students are n copies
resolve conflicts person's own required to respect Cannibalis
in moral culture, rather and ideals m Bond Paper
valuation bases than be judged students are
on cultural against the encouraged to White board
relativism criteria of meet. marker
another.
Eraser
LCD
Laptop
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 4 The nature Discuss the Good acts are Illustrate the Paper and Group work ICV Abortion Biology Proverbs Bond Paper
of human nature of human those done by voluntariness of Pen quiz Excellence 8:5
1.5 acts acts man in human acts Case Analysis Prostitution White board
harmony with through giving Presentatio RV “Are you marker
Voluntarines Differentiate the dictates of examples. n of moral Competenc immature?
s of human human acts from right reason; valuation on e Learn to be Eraser
acts acts of man evil acts are Determine the the sample mature. Are
those done by nature of example cases you foolish? LCD
The Explain the man in actions related to Learn to
determinant different contradiction the students’ have Laptop
of morality components of to the dictates course. sense.”
the human acts of right reason;
indifferent acts
are those act
that are neither
good nor evil.
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 4 The Moral Discuss the The action Apply the following Paper and Group ICV Euthanasia Biology Titus 2: 7 Bond Paper
Principle basic principle must be conditions in doing Pen quiz discussion on: Excellence
1.5 involved in on determining morally good an act which Counteratt Criminal “In all things White board
actions the action to be in itself and entails good as Reporting The trolley RV ack on Justice you yourself marker
having two taken for actions must precede well as bad on group dilemma Integrity terrorists system must be an
effects which good as the evil effect. consequences in case example of Eraser
well as bad the sample case analysis The woman good
The doctrine effects follow. studies. with rubric stuck on the behaviour. LCD
of double cave dilemma Be sincere
effect Demonstrate Determine the and serious Laptop
correct moral right action to be in your
judgement in taken in dilemmas teaching.”
moral dilemmas under the doctrine
using the of double effect.
principles of
double effect
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 6 The Discuss the A good act Analyse the Written quiz Lecture ICV Stealing to Law Exodus Bond Paper
circumstanc conditions that done with evil morality of actions Excellence provide 15:26
1.5 es of the act affect the human means through its Reflection Group food for the Political White board
act by increasing destroys the circumstances. paper on discussion RV family Science “ He said, if marker
The or decreasing entire objective good acts you will
Principles the responsibility goodness of done with Integrity Sociology obey me Eraser
involved in of the actor. the act. evil means completely
the with rubrics by doing LCD
circumstanc what I
es of the consider Laptop
action right and by
keeping my
commands,
I will not
punish you
with any of
the
diseases I
brought with
the
Egyptians. I
am the Lord
the on who
heals you
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 6 Introduction Explain the The greatest Apply the Written test Draw me up ICV Animal Sociology James 1:27 Bond Paper
to principle of good is the utilitarianism in Activity Faith rights over
1.5 Utilitarianis utilitarian ethics greatest understanding and Reflection human White board
m pleasure of the evaluating local paper on Case Analysis RV rights marker
Distinguish greatest and international war on Justice
The between two number scenarios drugs Group Death Eraser
principle of utilitarian discussion Penalty
utility models: the LCD
quantitative
The model of Jeremy Laptop
principle of Bentham and the
greatest qualitative model
number of John Stuart
Mill
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Name of Teacher: Edgar Ian L. Canete Subject: GEC 8-ETHICS Schedule: MTH 10:30 am – 12:00 pm
Allotment Generalization Outcomes Activities Social Across Scriptural
Related
Values
Week 7 The Discuss justice Justice is a Point out Written test Lecture ICV Animal rights Sociology James 1: 19- Bond
principle based on the respect for rights laws that are Faith over human 20 Paper
January of perspective of directed toward in Concept rights Humanities
14, 2019 greatest utilitarian society’s pursuit accordance mapping RV “Remember White
number principle. for the greatest to utilitarian Communion Death Penalty this, my dear board
1.5 hours happiness of the principle Group friends! marker
Justice Demonstrate the greatest number and valuate discussion Everyone
and necessity of its morality must be Eraser
moral considering quick to
rights everyone’s listen, but LCD
using happiness slow to speak
utilitarian including our and slow to Laptop
ethics own, as the become
standard by angry.
which to Human anger
evaluate what is does not
moral achieve
God’s
righteous
purpose.”
Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by:_______________________________

9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 7 The Explain the A leader needs Apply the Written test Charade ICV Animal rights Sociology 1 Tim 4:4 Bond
principle principle of to do utilitarianism in Faith over human Paper
January of greatest utilitarian something not understanding Reflection Lecture rights Economics “Everythin
17, 2019 number ethics necessarily and evaluating paper animal RV g that God White
good in order local and torture Justice Death Political has board
1.5 hours Justice Distinguish to attain international Penalty Science created is marker
and moral between two greater good. scenarios good;
rights utilitarian nothing is Eraser
using models: the to be
utilitarian quantitative rejected, LCD
ethics model of but
Jeremy everything Laptop
Bentham and is to be
the received
qualitative with a
model of prayer of
John Stuart thanks.”
Mill
Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by:_______________________________

9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 9 Natural Law Recognize how Man is created Articulate one’s Individual Lecture ICV Animal Religious Luke 7: 50 White board
Thomas Aquinas by God in idea why ma in Spoken Faith rights over Studies marker
1.5 hours The context made use of order to nature is good. exam with Group human
of the ancient Greek ultimately rubrics Discussion RV rights Theology Eraser
Christian concepts to return to Him; Determine the Strong
Story provide a hence man is quality of man’s Group Oral recitation Faith in Death LCD
rational good because goodness and reflection on God Penalty
The context grounding to an he is created determine the guide Laptop
of Aquinas’ ethical theory by God who is factors leading questions
Ethics based on the the source of man to commit sin
Christian Faith. all goodness. and immorality. Assignment
The on human
NeoPlatonic Explain the laws which
idea of good fundamental violate
concepts of natural law
Aristotelian Christian Faith
being and as the
becoming foundation of
Thomas
Aquinas’ Natural
Law
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 9 The Identify the Human beings Evaluate the Policy Group moral ICV Extrajudici Law Jonh 13:15 Bond Paper
Essence natural law in participate morality of existing making valuation on the Excellence al killings
1.5 hours and distinction from, more fully and international and morality of GEC 1 White board
Varieties of but also in perfectly in the national laws Group existing laws in RV Same sex marker
Law relation to, the eternal law based on the Presentatio the Philippines Self- marriage
other types of given the principle of Natural n of output Reliance Eraser
Natural Law law mentioned capacity for Law. Case Analysis
by Aquinas: reason. Man in LCD
Nature of eternal law, Nature is good Formulate laws Lecture
Man that is human law, and because of his that are for the Laptop
uniquely divine law. nature as common good and
human rational being. in harmony with
Apply the natural law.
precepts of the
natural law to
contemporary
moral concerns.
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 10 The Discuss the Sometimes Construct Lecture Group moral ICV Lowering Political Proverbs Print out on
Machiavellia moral principle of people have to valuation on valuation on the Excellence of age of Science 11:3 case
1.5 hours n Principle Niccolo do something Machiavelli’s Role Play morality of liability to samples
Machiavelli “the not necessarily ethical principle. existing laws in RV 12 years
Human end justifies the good to attain Assignment: the Philippines Integrity old White board
nature and means something Illustrate the Position marker
the social good; “the end extent of paper on Case Analysis War on
problems of Criticise justifies the Machiavellian war on Drugs Props
his times. Machiavellian means”. ethics in the drugs Lecture
principle and country through Speaker
identify its role play
advantages and Laptop
disadvantages
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 10 Ethical Explain the The moral Create a Case Case study ICV Lowering Psycholog Jonh 13:15 Print out on
Egoism principle of purpose of scenario analysis Excellence of age of y case
1.5 hours principle of Ethical egoism man’s life is the presenting the Group liability to samples
Ayn Rand and its moral achievement of attainment of Essay discussion RV 12 years
implication on his own happiness Integrity old White board
Rational valuating one’s happiness by requiring a marker
Selfishness action finding the morality of War on
ruling values in rational Drugs Props
Differentiate his life: reason, selfishness.
Ethical egoism purpose and Speaker
from Egotism self-esteem. Illustrate the
and Selfishness concept of Laptop
rational self-
interest through
sample issue of
saving a
drowning man or
yourself.
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Time Concept Learning Learning Material
Content Objectives Assessment
Allotment Generalization Outcomes Activities Core Values/ Social Across Scriptural s
Related Values Orientation Discipline Text
Week 11 Deontology Discuss the We are Determine the Written Quiz Group ICV Marrying a Psychology John Print out
basic principles encouraged to property of discussion Excellence woman a 13:15 on case
February Duty and of duty and have courage to rational will is Essay on the man Law samples
21, 2019 Agency obligation as think on our own, applicable to duties and Quiz bowl RV impregnated “ I have
the underlying to use our sample actions. obligations of Integrity even if he set an White
1.5 hours Properties motive of one’s rational will students does not example board
of rational action. against external Conduct moral love her. for you, so marker
will: authorities as valuation on that you
Autonomou well as internal sample cases Divorce will do just Props
s and Apply the base impulses as ethical or what I
Heteronom concepts of that tend to unethical based have done Speaker
ous will agency and undermine our on the principle for you.”
autonomy to autonomy as self- of deontology. Laptop
one’s moral determination.
experience Eraser
Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by: ________________________________

9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Allotment Generalization Outcomes Activities Social Across
Related Scriptural Text
Orientation Discipline
Values
Week 11 Deontology Discuss the We ought to act Evaluate Written Quiz Lecture ICV Whistle Law Genesis 20: 6 Print out on
principle of according to actions on applying Excellence blowing case
February Universaliz universalizabi such a maxim using the the Group Mathematic God replied in samples
25, 2019 ability lity of action by which you universaliza universalizabili work: RV s the dream “Yes I
method and its the can at once will bility test. ty method in Integrity know that you White
1.5 hours method that it become determining Conclude did it with clear board
Duty as a universal law Determine the morality of articulating conscience so I marker
Motive Apply the the rational actions duty to the kept you from
universalizabi permissibilit sample sinning against Eraser
lity method y of sample actions me and not let
to evaluate cases using the you touch me.”
the morality actions universaliz
of actions ability
method
Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by:______________________________

9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 12 Virtue Discuss the A morally Differentiate Written test Lecture ICV Self- Psycholog Proverbs Print out on
Ethics meaning and virtuous man is actions that are Excellence sacrifice y 11:3 case
1.5 hours basic principles someone who virtuous and Essay: Group samples
Happiness of virtue Ethics habitually non-virtuous Who is the discussion and RV Saving Personalit
and determines the person you group report Integrity lives of y White board
Ultimate Distinguish good and does Identify persons consider as a others Developm marker
purpose virtuous acts the right with moral person with ent
from non- actions. excellence excellence? Eraser
Virtue as virtuous acts
Excellence
Apply Aristotle’s
Virtue Ethics in
understanding
the Filipino
Character.
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 12 Deontology Discuss the We ought to act Evaluate actions Written Quiz Lecture ICV Whistle Proverbs Genesis 20: Print out on
principle of according to using the on applying Excellence blowing 11:3 6 case
1.5 hours Universaliza universalizability such a maxim universalizability the Group work: samples
bility of action and its by which you test. universalizab RV God replied
method the method can at once will ility method Conclude Integrity in the dream White board
that it become a Determine the in articulating duty “Yes I know marker
Duty as Apply the universal law rational determining to the sample that you did
Motive universalizability permissibility of the morality actions using it with clear Eraser
method to sample cases of actions the conscience
evaluate the actions universalizabilit so I kept
morality of y method you from
actions sinning
against me
and not let
you touch
me.”
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 14 Relation Explain the A man of faith is Illustrate the Written Test Lecture ICV Detention Sociology John 16:33 Print out on
between interrelationship confirmed in his significance of Faith of the topic
1.5 hours Ethics and of Ethics and moral postulate ethics and Presentation Group work: Australian Religious
Religious Religious belief and actualizing religious beliefs of Posters Poster making RV nun Sister Studies White board
Belief in a person’s himself and in the formation with rubrics Patricia marker
moral seeking justice of one’s moral Prophetic Fox
Human development and the character witness to Eraser
responses community of through poster. Gospel
to evil Discuss the free wills. Values Illustration
three human board
responses to
evil: cynicism, Drawing and
stoicism, coloring
religious materials
Rubric
photocopy
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 14 The Discuss the There is no Identify cultural Written Test Lecture ICV Detention Sociology Matthew 5: Print out on
Challenge different objective truth practices from Faith of the 24 topic
1.5 hours of Cultural arguments in in morality. other countries Essay: Group work: Australian Anthropol
Relativism cultural Right and which are in critique on Determining RV nun Sister ogy White board
relativism. Wrong are only moral conflict the Five the morality of Patricia marker
The Cultural matters of with the Filipino claims of moral codes Communio Fox Economic
differences Explain the opinion, and Culture. cultural from different n s Eraser
Argument claims of cultural opinions vary relativism cultures
relativist and from culture to Determine moral Paper
The Five make a critique culture values that are
claims in on its moral shared by all
cultural principle cultures
relativism
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Values
Week 15 The Discuss the There is no Identify cultural Written Test Lecture ICV Detention Sociology Matthew 5: Print out on
Challenge different objective truth practices from Faith of the 24 topic
1.5 hours of Cultural arguments in in morality. other countries Essay: Group work: Australian Anthropol
Relativism cultural Right and which are in critique on Determining RV nun Sister ogy White board
relativism. Wrong are only moral conflict the Five the morality of Patricia marker
The Cultural matters of with the Filipino claims of moral codes Communio Fox Economic
differences Explain the opinion, and Culture. cultural from different n s Eraser
Argument claims of cultural opinions vary relativism cultures
relativist and from culture to Determine moral Paper
The Five make a critique culture values that are
claims in on its moral shared by all
cultural principle cultures
relativism
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Name of Teacher: Edgar Ian L. Canete Subject: GEC 8 Ethics Schedule: MTH 10:30 am – 12:00 pm
Allotment
Content Objectives Assessment Social Across Scriptural Materials
Generalization Outcomes Activities Values/Rela
ted Values
Week 15 Character Discuss which Character is the Distinguish Think/Pair/S Teacher CV APEC 2016 Bible Case
habits, pattern of and connect hare Input Political Verse studies
1.5 The Four fashions, virtues that are the four Faith World Oil Science photocopies
hours Temperaments beliefs, morally fundamental Output: List Guided Case Crisis Ecclesiast
opinions and desirable. It temperaments of Study RV Religious es 4:13
Types of practices are also includes to the various Workplace Studies
Character considered as attributes that classifications Activities Round Robin Integrity A cord of
components of determine a of character as Discussion Humanities three
Ethics vs. good person’s moral adopted by Short strands is
Character character. and ethical psychologists. Reflection not quickly
actions and broken.
The Role of Distinguish responses. It is Create a list of
Education in and connect also the ground workplace
Character the four upon which activities that
Building fundamental morals and are influential
temperaments values in creating a
to the various blossoms. positive work
classifications culture/environ
of character as ment
adopted by
psychologists.
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Allotment
ted Values
Week 16 Discuss which Character is the Distinguish Think/Pair/S Teacher CV Workplace Bible Case
Building habits, pattern of and connect hare Input Romance Political Verse studies
1.5 Character in fashions, virtues that are the four Faith Science photocopies
hours the Workplace beliefs, morally fundamental Output: List Guided Case Bribery Ecclesiast
opinions and desirable. It temperaments of Study RV Religious es 4:13 LCD
Employee practices are also includes to the various Workplace Studies
Hiring and considered as attributes that classifications Activities Round Robin Integrity A cord of Laptop
Training components of determine a of character as Discussion Humanities three
good person’s moral adopted by Short strands is White board
Internal character. and ethical psychologists. Reflection not quickly marker
Communication actions and broken.
Distinguish responses. It is Create a list of Eraser
External and connect also the ground workplace
Communication the four upon which activities that
fundamental morals and are influential
Community temperaments values in creating a
Outreach to the various blossoms. positive work
classifications culture/environ
of character as ment
adopted by
psychologists.
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Allotment
ted Values
Week 16 Common Discuss Micro ethics Create Essay Teacher CV Capitalism Business Ecclesias Case
Ethical common deals with examples on Input Management tes 4:13 studies
1.5 Problems in the ethical decisions and micro ethical Pen and Faith World photocopies
hours Workplace problems in problems of inquiry. Pencil test Guided Case Economic Religious A cord of
the workplace individuals, Study RV Forum in Studies three Marker
Low Employee and how professionals, Brainstorm Short Davos 2016 strands is
Morale effective and companies. about possible Reporting Round Robin Integrity Humanities not
managers deal solutions to on the Discussion quickly
Lack of with them. common Output of broken.
Promotion or workplace Brainstormi
Career Differentiate ethical ng Session
Development micro-ethics dilemmas by
Activities from macro- applying
ethics. normative,
Lack of conceptual or
Transparency . factual inquiry.
.
Absence of a .
Recognition .
System
Poor Working
Environment
9014 Gingoog City
LEARNING PLAN
Allotment
ted Values
Week 17 Inquiries in Discuss Macro ethics Create Essay Teacher CV Capitalism Business Ecclesias Case
Solving Ethical common deals with the examples on Input Management tes 4:13 studies
Problems ethical societal macro ethical Pen and Faith World photocopies
problems in problems on a inquiry. Pencil test Guided Case Economic Religious A cord of
Normative the workplace regional/nationa Study RV Forum in Studies three Marker
Inquiry and how l level. For Brainstorm Short Davos 2016 strands is
effective example, global about possible Reporting Round Robin Integrity Humanities not
Conceptual managers deal issues, solutions to on the Discussion quickly
Inquiry with them. collective common Output of broken.
responsibilities workplace Brainstormi
Factual Inquiry Differentiate of groups such ethical ng Session
micro-ethics as professional dilemmas by
from macro- societies and applying
ethics. consumer normative,
groups. conceptual or
. factual inquiry.
.
.
.

LG Gec8

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

LG Gec8

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

CHRIST THE KING COLLEGE

9014 Gingoog City

Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by: ______________________________

Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by: ______________________________

Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by:_______________________________

Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by:_______________________________

9014 Gingoog City

9014 Gingoog City

9014 Gingoog City

9014 Gingoog City

9014 Gingoog City

Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by: ________________________________

9014 Gingoog City

Prepared by: EDGAR IAN L. CANETE Checked by:______________________________

9014 Gingoog City

9014 Gingoog City

9014 Gingoog City

9014 Gingoog City

9014 Gingoog City

S-ar putea să vă placă și