Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1. Q: What is the involvement of the LCE in the preparation of the PDPFP and
PDIP?
A: The Governor as well as the Provincial Development Council (PDC) provides
overall policy direction in the preparation of the PDPFP and PDIP. In PDPFP
formulation, the Governor is expected to articulate the provincial vision, goals,
objectives, targets, and PPAs in the PDC and RDC, in order to harmonize
them with those of component cities/ municipalities and other provinces in the
region. Note that the PLPEM guidelines recognize the active support of the
LCE as the single most important factor that can enhance the quality and
implementation of the PDPFP.
6. Q: What is the role of the RLUC in the approval process of the PDPFP?
A: The RLUCs are among the stakeholders that will be consulted during the
preparation of the draft PDPFP. The draft PDPFP, with appropriate revisions
according to public hearing, will be submitted to the Sanggunian for approval.
The RLUC (of which HLURB is a member) shall review the PDPFP prior to
the Sangguniang Panlalawigan’s approval.
7. Q: Should the Provincial PLPEM Core team (PCT) include the members of
the Provincial Land Use Committee (PLUC) and other agencies that can
provide data as well as assistance needed for PDPFP preparation?
A: The province may include PLUC/RLUC members in the composition of the
core team.
8. Q: Does the merger of PDP and PPFP conform to the Local Government
Code (LGC) that mandates the preparation of these plans?
A: The merger of these traditionally separate plan documents into PDPFP does
not contradict the LGC inasmuch as the PDPFP contains land use and
physical framework and practically covers the contents of both development
and physical framework plans (see Question No. 11). The merger is intended
to eliminate overlaps in these documents and addresses the spatial-sectoral
disconnect that characterized provincial plan documents.
9. Q: Can the province opt to prepare two separate plans (i.e., PDP and
PPFP)?
A: The province may still decide to do so given its autonomy. However, NEDA
will be providing technical assistance to provinces for the preparation of the
PDPFP. This initiative has been well-received given the Memorandum of
Agreement/Understanding between the provinces and the NROs.
• Introduction • Introduction
• Situational Analysis
A. Historical Background
B. Plan Objectives and Context
A. Physical Characteristics
C. Coverage of the Plan
B. Population
D. Outline of the Plan
C. Economy
D. Settlements • Vision
E. Land Resources
F. Sustainability of Land Use
• The Planning Environment
A. Location, Land Area and Political
G. Environmental Considerations
Subdivisions
H. Constraints to Future Land Use
B. Population and Settlements
I. Infrastructure
C. Physical Resources
J. National and Regional Policies
D. Economy
Applicable to the Province
E. Transportation, Access and Circulation
K. Provincial/City/Municipal/CDPs,
F. Income, Employment, Service Access,
CLUPs and other Physical Plans
Poverty
• The PPFP G. Land Use and Physical Framework
A. Goals, Objectives, and Vision 1. Existing land use, trends and
B. Alternative Spatial Strategies potential expansion
C. Preferred Strategy 2. Physical Framework
D. Plan Components (i.e., demand; supply; demand and
supply integration; physical
• Implementation
framework)
• Draft PPFP Integration, Endorsement,
• Development Issues, Goals,
Consultations and Public Hearing
Objectives/Targets
• Refinement of the Draft PPFP A. Development Issues and Problems
• Final PPFP Adoption, Approval and B. Development Goals, Objectives/Targets
Implementation • Strategies, Programs, Projects and
• Plan Monitoring, Evaluation and Re- Activities
planning A. Strategies, Programs, Projects and
Activities
B. Summary of Strategies and PPAs
• Draft PDPFP
• PDPFP Approval
For the children sector, NEDA has been advocating to agencies such as
DSWD, CWC, UNICEF and Local Councils for the Protection of Children, in
various meetings, the importance of just preparing a comprehensive action
plan for children instead of preparing a development plan and other separate
plans concerning children.
16. Q: What will provinces do if they lack the data for PDPFP preparation? For
instance, what income data will they use in the absence of provincial
GDP and 2006 FIES income data for provinces?
A: The PLPEM guidelines recognize that lack of data hinders straightforward
technical analysis, but assume that planning decisions will be made with
incomplete information. Provinces could use the latest available, projected or
proxy data, or derive estimates from available data.
In the absence of provincial GDP, the total family income by household head
kind of business/industry by province and sector (from FIES) may be used.
Since provincial breakdown is not available in the 2006 FIES, provincial
estimates can be derived by applying the 2000 FIES (a) percentage
distribution of provincial income within the region and (b) percent share of
sectors within a province, to the 2006 total family income of a region (by
household head kind of business/industry), in order to arrive at provincial and
sectoral income estimates. This methodology assumes that items a and b are
still the same in 2006.
Another methodology for estimating the 2006 FIES provincial income is the
extrapolation of percent share of provincial income based on historical data
(1994, 1997, 2000 FIES). The same applies to provincial income by sector.
=(((POWER(Pt/Po,1/t))-1))*100
18. Q: What programs, projects and activities (PPAs) should be included in the
PDIP?
A: The PPAs that should be included in the PDIP should emanate from the vision,
goals, objectives and strategies under the PDPFP. Additional PPAs identified
as a result of unforeseen circumstances (e.g., natural disasters) may be
included in the updating of PDIP/Annual Investment Program (AIP).
19. Q: Why is there a need to prepare an AIP if the PDIP is already formulated?
A: The Annual Investment Program (AIP) constitutes the annual slice of the
PDIP, or the indicative yearly expenditure requirements of the LGUs’ PPAs to
be integrated into the annual budget. It is updated annually to take into
account the changes in priority PPAs due to revised provincial/ regional/
national priorities, fiscal situation, and/or unforeseen events prior to the
budgeting process.
For budgeting purposes, the JMC AIP form with 3 sectoral categories (i.e.,
economic, social, and general public services) should be used.
NOTE: The JMC AIP form (see JMC Annex) which consolidates the 4 AIP
forms in the Updated Budget Operations Manual’s was adopted by the
PLPEM guidelines (see page 62 of PLPEM Vol. 3)
21. Q: The infrastructure PPAs identified in the PDIP may be classified in any of
the 5 sectors indicated in PLPEM Volume 3. How will these be classified
to fit the JMC AIP form with 3 sectoral categories?
A: PLPEM Vol. 3 categorizes projects into 5 sectors that are mainly along the
devolved responsibilities of LGUs. For budgeting purposes, these could be
funneled through the 3 categories prescribed by the LGC (Sec. 317), namely:
economic, social and general public services. As categorization at the local
level is done by office (not by project), PDIP projects could easily be classified
Sector Office
Economic Agriculture, Engineering (includes construction of infrastructure
Services projects), Environment and Natural Resources, Economic
Enterprises, Market Administration, Business Permit and
Licenses, Tourism and Cultural Affairs
Social Services Health, Education and Manpower, Housing and Community
Development, Social Welfare
General Public Administrative (includes repair and maintenance of
Services infrastructure projects), Treasury, Executive, Legislative
22. Q: What are the alternative measures to legitimize the PDIP especially when
the prioritized PPAs identified by the PCT (after undergoing the planning
and investment programming process) are not the priorities of the
legislative body of the province?
A: The issue of legitimization could be addressed by following the PLPEM-
suggested composition of LDC for PDPFP formulation and the expanded
PDIP committee for PDIP preparation. The PLPEM also identifies consultation
points to make the planning/programming activity a participatory process.
Wider representation and involvement shall give all stakeholders a sense of
ownership of the PDIP and facilitate its legitimization.
C. PLPEM Guidelines
24. Q: What is the basis for adopting the PLPEM guidelines in the preparation
of local plans?
A: The JMC, though it does not have the effect of an EO, is the basis for
adopting the PLPEM guidelines for the preparation of PDPFP and PDIP. The
process is further adopted at the provincial level through the NEDA-Province
MOA.
25. Q: Why do the PLPEM Guidelines exclude the HRLUB review and
ratification of local plans?
A: The PDPFP preparation/approval process reflected in the PDPFP Guidelines
is confined to LGU processes. Thus, it ends with the approval of the PDPFP
by the Sanggunian.
HLURB is not included in the JMC as the latter focuses on the harmonization
of local planning-investment programming-budgeting-revenue administration
27. Q: There are too many reference manuals being endorsed by NG agencies
to LGUs. Which one should the LGUs follow?
A: The LGUs may follow the guidelines/manuals endorsed by oversight agencies
under the JMC. The JMC defines the delineation of the oversight agencies’
guidelines/ manuals and it clarifies which guidelines apply to specific LGU
level. But given LGUs’ autonomy, the LGUs will decide which guidelines they
are going to use.
28. Q: How does the JMC harmonize agency guidelines such as NEDA’s
PLPEM and DILG’s CDP manual?
A: The JMC harmonized the oversight agencies’ guidelines/ manuals by
clarifying which of these apply to an LGU level.
DILG’s RPS sourcebook and CDP manual have been updated to conform to
the JMC. The PLPEM may serve as framework in the preparation of more
detailed guidelines for municipalities. For this purpose, it has been agreed
that the oversight agencies will review the revised RPS and CDP manual for
consistency with the JMC. (Note: The PLPEM is already consistent with the
JMC. The JMC was formulated to resolve issues raised in the course of
PLPEM preparation. The PLPEM was finalized taking into account the
agreements of the oversight agencies as embodied in the JMC.)
31. Q: Despite the intention of the JMC to rationalize the many plans required
by NG agencies, there are still directives to prepare separate sector
plans. Isn’t this inconsistent with the JMC?
A: The JMC supports the preparation of a single development plan for LGUs.
But it does not prevent LGUs from preparing action plans that would
accompany the development plan. Action plan formulation is better than
preparing separate plans for specific sectors. The important thing is that LGUs
are able to rationalize their planning work by not going through the entire
planning process again.
32. Q: What is the role of the Local Development Councils (LDC) in the
synchronization and harmonization of plans?
A: As defined in the LGC and JMC, the LDC is the body mandated to assist the
Sanggunian in setting the direction of economic and social development, and
coordinating development efforts within their respective territorial jurisdictions.