SSF SKID

STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT

Please consider the environment before printing this document.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................................................................. 3
1.2 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................. 3
1.3 COORDINATE SYSTEM IN THE STAAD .......................................................................................................... 3
2 STAAD.PRO ANALYSIS-LIFTING CONDITION ............................................................................................... 4
2.1 NODE DETAILS .................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 STRUCTURAL MEMBER DETAILS................................................................................................................... 5
2.3 STRUCTURAL PROPERTY DETAILS............................................................................................................... 6
2.4 RENDERED VIEW ................................................................................................................................................ 7
2.5 BASIC LOADS ...................................................................................................................................................... 8
2.6 LOAD COMBINATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 8
2.7 DESIGN LOAD APPLICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 8
2.7.1 DEAD LOADS ....................................................................................................................................................... 8
2.8 UTILISATION RATIO............................................................................................................................................ 9
2.9 STAAD RESULT ................................................................................................................................................. 10
2.10 LIFTING PAD EYE DESIGN .............................................................................................................................. 16
3 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................................................... 19

2
1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE

The document deals with the Structural analysis and design of the SSF skid, which includes the
following:

 Lifting analysis of the skid

1.2 METHODOLOGY

For lifting analysis of the skid:

The base frame of the skid structure is connected from 4 lifting Lugs. The spreader beam is
connected to the lifting hook. The location of the hook is adjusted to match with the eccentricity of
the load system.

1.3 COORDINATE SYSTEM IN THE STAAD

The coordinate system used in the STAAD model was chosen as follows:

 X-Axis: transverse direction of the structure.

 Y-Axis: vertical direction, positive pointing upwards.
 Z-Axis: Longitudinal direction of the structure

STAAD Model coordinate system

3
2 STAAD.PRO ANALYSIS-LIFTING CONDITION

2.1 NODE DETAILS

4
2.2 STRUCTURAL MEMBER DETAILS

5
2.3 STRUCTURAL PROPERTY DETAILS

6
2.4 RENDERED VIEW

Slings

Spreader Frame

3D View

7
 2.5 BASIC LOADS

Type Notation Load case

Primary DL DEAD LOAD (DL)

2.6 LOAD COMBINATIONS

LOAD COMB 101 1.0 DL

LOAD COMB 102 2.0 DL

2.7 DESIGN LOAD APPLICATIONS

2.7.1 DEAD LOADS

The self-weight of the entire structural frame is considered in STAAD with the SELFWEIGHT
command.
The equipment weights considered as per the drawing - 50516-VE-XX-00-DR-M-XX02

Dead Load Application in the Model

8
2.8 UTILISATION RATIO
The applied computer program is STAAD.Pro V8i, with BS5950-2000 for the analysis of
the members in the skid structure.

9
 2.9 STAAD RESULT

PAGE NO. 1

****************************************************
* *
* STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition *
* Version 21.00.02.43 *
* Proprietary Program of *
* Bentley Systems, Inc. *
* Date= MAY 20, 2019 *
* Time= 15:46: 4 *
* *
* Licensed to: Barry-Wehmiller International *
****************************************************

1. STAAD SPACE
INPUT FILE: D:\Projects\Vital\Liverpool\Dsn\Staad\SSF Skid_Lifting_17052019.STD
2. START JOB INFORMATION
3. ENGINEER DATE 14-MAY-19
4. END JOB INFORMATION
5. INPUT WIDTH 79
6. UNIT METER KN
7. JOINT COORDINATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 3.165 0 0; 3 0 0 0.58; 4 3.165 0 0.58; 5 0.155 0 0; 6 0.155 0 0.58
9. 7 0.495 0 0; 8 0.495 0 0.58; 9 0.99 0 0; 10 0.99 0 0.58; 11 1.25 0 0
10. 12 1.25 0 0.58; 13 2.02 0 0; 14 2.02 0 0.58; 15 3.02 0 0; 16 3.02 0 0.58
11. 17 0.35 0 0; 18 0.35 0 0.58; 19 2.815 0 0; 20 2.815 0 0.58; 21 0.7 0 0
12. 22 0.7 2.5 0; 23 0.7 1.25 0; 24 1.45 0 0; 25 1.45 2.3 0; 26 1.45 1.25 0
13. 27 1.325 0 0.58; 28 1.325 2.5 0.58; 29 3.0925 0 0; 30 3.0925 2.3 0
14. 31 1.45 1.93 0; 32 3.0925 1.93 0; 33 0.35 3 0; 34 0.35 3 0.58; 35 2.815 3 0
15. 36 2.815 3 0.58; 37 0.35 3 0.29; 38 2.815 3 0.29; 40 0.8825 3 0.29
16. 41 2.2825 3 0.29; 43 1.5825 4 0.29
17. MEMBER INCIDENCES
18. 1 1 5; 2 3 6; 3 1 3; 4 2 4; 5 5 17; 6 6 18; 7 5 6; 8 7 21; 9 8 10; 10 7 8
19. 11 9 11; 12 10 12; 13 9 10; 14 11 24; 15 12 27; 16 11 12; 17 13 19; 18 14 20
20. 19 13 14; 20 15 29; 21 16 4; 22 15 16; 23 17 7; 24 18 8; 25 19 15; 26 20 16
21. 27 21 9; 28 21 23; 29 23 22; 30 24 13; 31 24 26; 32 26 31; 33 23 26; 34 27 14
22. 35 27 28; 36 29 2; 37 29 32; 38 31 25; 39 32 30; 40 31 32; 41 17 33; 42 18 34
23. 43 19 35; 44 20 36; 45 33 37; 46 35 38; 47 37 34; 48 38 36; 49 37 40; 50 41 40
24. 52 41 38; 54 40 43; 55 41 43
25. DEFINE MATERIAL START
26. ISOTROPIC STEEL
27. E 2.05E+08
28. POISSON 0.3
29. DENSITY 76.8195
30. ALPHA 1.2E-05
31. DAMP 0.03

10
 32. TYPE STEEL
33. STRENGTH FY 253200 FU 407800 RY 1.5 RT 1.2
34. ISOTROPIC DUMMY
35. E 2.05E+10
36. POISSON 0.3
37. DENSITY 0
38. ALPHA 1.2E-05
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 2

39. DAMP 0.03

40. TYPE STEEL
41. STRENGTH FY 253200 FU 407800 RY 1.5 RT 1.2
42. END DEFINE MATERIAL
43. MEMBER PROPERTY BRITISH
44. 1 TO 40 TABLE ST CH100X50X10
45. 45 TO 50 52 TABLE ST UC152X152X23
46. 41 TO 44 54 55 TABLE ST PIP213.2
47. CONSTANTS
48. MATERIAL STEEL MEMB 1 TO 40 45 TO 50 52
49. MATERIAL DUMMY MEMB 41 TO 44 54 55
50. SUPPORTS
51. 18 19 33 TO 36 FIXED BUT FY MX MY MZ
52. 43 PINNED
53. MEMBER TENSION
54. 41 TO 44 54 55
55. LOAD 1 LOADTYPE DEAD TITLE DL
56. MEMBER LOAD
57. 37 CON GY -0.3
58. SELFWEIGHT Y -1
59. FLOOR LOAD
60. YRANGE 0 0 FLOAD -4.14 XRANGE 1.25 3.02 ZRANGE 0 0.58 GY
**NOTE** about Floor/OneWay Loads/Weights.
Please note that depending on the shape of the floor you may
have to break up the FLOOR/ONEWAY LOAD into multiple commands.
For details please refer to Technical Reference Manual
Section 5.32.4.2 Note d and/or "5.32.4.3 Note f.

61. MEMBER LOAD

62. 13 16 CON GY -0.05 0.2
63. 16 CON GY -0.05 0.4
64. 7 10 UNI GY -0.2
65. ******
66. LOAD COMB 101 2 X DL
67. 1 2.0
68. PERFORM ANALYSIS

** WARNING ** A STIFF MATERIAL WITH 1.025E+02 TIMES THE STIFFNESS OF STEEL

ENTERED. PLEASE CHECK.

11
 STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 3

PROBLEM STATISTICS
-----------------------------------

NUMBER OF JOINTS 41 NUMBER OF MEMBERS 53

NUMBER OF PLATES 0 NUMBER OF SOLIDS 0
NUMBER OF SURFACES 0 NUMBER OF SUPPORTS 7

Using 64-bit analysis engine.

SOLVER USED IS THE OUT-OF-CORE BASIC SOLVER

ORIGINAL/FINAL BAND-WIDTH= 27/ 6/ 42 DOF

TOTAL PRIMARY LOAD CASES = 1, TOTAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM = 231
TOTAL LOAD COMBINATION CASES = 1 SO FAR.
SIZE OF STIFFNESS MATRIX = 10 DOUBLE KILO-WORDS
REQRD/AVAIL. DISK SPACE = 12.2/ 193071.3 MB

*WARNING- ZERO STIFFNESS IN DIRECTION 4 AT JOINT 43 EQN.NO. 163

LOADS APPLIED OR DISTRIBUTED HERE FROM ELEMENTS WILL BE IGNORED.
THIS MAY BE DUE TO ALL MEMBERS AT THIS JOINT BEING RELEASED OR
EFFECTIVELY RELEASED IN THIS DIRECTION.
*WARNING- ZERO STIFFNESS IN DIRECTION 5 AT JOINT 43 EQN.NO. 164
*WARNING- ZERO STIFFNESS IN DIRECTION 6 AT JOINT 43 EQN.NO. 165

***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 3 DIRECTION = MX

PROBABLE CAUSE SINGULAR-ADDING WEAK SPRING
K-MATRIX DIAG= 2.0705632E+04 L-MATRIX DIAG= 4.2564352E-10 EQN NO 229
***NOTE - VERY WEAK SPRING ADDED FOR STABILITY

**NOTE** STAAD DETECTS INSTABILITIES AS EXCESSIVE LOSS OF SIGNIFICANT DIGITS

DURING DECOMPOSITION. WHEN A DECOMPOSED DIAGONAL IS LESS THAN THE
BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR TIMES THE ORIGINAL STIFFNESS MATRIX DIAGONAL,
STAAD PRINTS A SINGULARITY NOTICE. THE BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR
IS 1.000E-09

THE ABOVE CONDITIONS COULD ALSO BE CAUSED BY VERY STIFF OR VERY WEAK
ELEMENTS AS WELL AS TRUE SINGULARITIES.

**NOTE-Tension/Compression converged after 1 iterations, Case= 1

69. PARAMETER 1
70. CODE BS5950
71. LY 2.465 MEMB 8 9 11 12 14 15 17 18 23 24 27 30 34
72. LZ 2.465 MEMB 8 9 11 12 14 15 17 18 23 24 27 30 34
73. LZ 0.75 MEMB 1 2 5 6 20 21 25 26 36
74. LY 0.75 MEMB 1 2 5 6 20 21 25 26 36

12
 76. CHECK CODE MEMB 1 TO 40
STEEL DESIGN

STAAD.Pro CODE CHECKING - (BSI )

***********************

PROGRAM CODE REVISION V2.13_5950-1_2000

STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 4

ALL UNITS ARE - KN METE (UNLESS OTHERWISE Noted)

MEMBER TABLE RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/

FX MY MZ LOCATION
=======================================================================

1 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.2.3-(Y) 0.009 101

0.00 T -0.00 0.06 0.00
2 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.2.3-(Y) 0.011 101
0.00 C 0.00 -0.08 0.16
3 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.046 101
0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00
4 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.017 101
0.00 T 0.01 0.16 0.00
5 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.010 101
0.00 T 0.00 0.10 0.00
6 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.022 101
0.01 C 0.00 0.23 -
7 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.003 101
0.00 T 0.00 0.02 0.00
8 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.095 101
0.00 T 0.02 1.00 0.00
9 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.078 101
0.00 T 0.01 0.84 0.00
10 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.010 101
0.03 C 0.01 0.07 -
11 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.046 101
0.00 T 0.01 0.50 0.00
12 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.114 101
0.00 T 0.01 1.28 0.00
13 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.007 101
0.00 T 0.01 0.05 0.00
14 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.047 101
0.00 T 0.02 0.44 0.00
15 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.125 101
0.01 C 0.00 1.41 -
16 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.009 101
0.03 C 0.01 0.07 -
17 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.082 101
0.00 T 0.01 0.90 0.00
18 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.122 101

13
 0.00 T 0.01 1.34 0.00
19 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.017 101
0.00 T 0.01 0.14 0.00
20 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.064 101
0.00 T 0.03 0.60 0.00
21 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.017 101
0.00 T 0.01 0.13 0.00
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 5

ALL UNITS ARE - KN METE (UNLESS OTHERWISE Noted)

MEMBER TABLE RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/

FX MY MZ LOCATION
=======================================================================

22 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.012 101

0.17 C 0.00 0.12 -
23 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.047 101
0.00 T 0.00 0.52 0.00
24 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.022 101
0.00 T 0.00 0.23 0.00
25 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.084 101
0.00 T 0.02 0.90 0.00
26 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.042 101
0.00 T 0.01 0.43 0.00
27 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.050 101
0.00 T 0.03 0.45 0.00
28 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.119 101
1.87 C 0.12 0.74 -
29 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.7 (C) 0.001 101
0.25 C -0.00 0.00 0.00
30 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.076 101
0.00 T 0.03 0.75 0.00
31 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.044 101
0.00 T 0.06 0.25 0.00
32 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.9 0.098 101
0.00 T 0.09 0.72 0.00
33 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.070 101
0.93 C 0.05 0.55 -
34 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.132 101
0.01 C 0.00 1.49 -
35 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.7 (C) 0.006 101
0.50 C -0.00 0.00 0.00
36 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.015 101
0.03 C 0.02 0.09 -
37 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.141 101
1.75 C 0.17 0.58 -
38 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.7 (C) 0.000 101
0.07 C -0.00 -0.00 0.00
39 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.7 (C) 0.000 101
0.07 C -0.00 0.00 0.00

14
 40 ST CH100X50X10 PASS BS-4.8.3.3.1 0.079 101
0.59 C 0.06 0.55 -

************** END OF TABULATED RESULT OF DESIGN **************

78. FINISH
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 6

*********** END OF THE STAAD.Pro RUN ***********

**** DATE= MAY 20,2019 TIME= 15:46: 5 ****

************************************************************
* For technical assistance on STAAD.Pro, please visit *
* http://www.bentley.com/en/support/ *
* *
* Details about additional assistance from *
* Bentley and Partners can be found at program menu *
* Help->Technical Support *
* *
* Copyright (c) 1997-2017 Bentley Systems, Inc. *
* http://www.bentley.com *
************************************************************

15
 2.10 LIFTING PAD EYE DESIGN

Four Pad eyes are provided on the skid base frame for the Rigging arrangement.

SKID BASE LIFTING PAD EYE DESIGN

1. Design Condition:

Maximum Sling Force (From STAAD) = 3 kN

Factor of safety = 2
Factored Sling Force P = 6.00 kN
Angle for Sling to Deck q1 = 90.00 Deg

2.Dimension and Materials:

Yield Stress Fy = 250 N/mm2

Pin Diameter Dp = 19.00 mm

Jaw Width W = 27.00 mm
Inside Length S = 70.00 mm
Padeye hole diameter Dh = 22.00 mm
Hole centre to base frame Hh = 150.00 mm
Main plate radius Rm = 30.00 mm
Main plate length Lm = 80.00 mm
Main plate thickness Tm = 20.00 mm
3.Stress Calculation:

Horizontal force on padeye(Ph=P*Cosθ1*Cosθ2) Ph = 0.00 kN

Vertical force on padeye(Pv=P*Sinθ1) Pv = 6.00 kN

A.Bearing stress check(Eye Portion)

Bearing Stress on Eye Portion

(fp= P /(Dp*(Tm+Tc1*2+Tc2*2))) fp = 15.79 N/mm2
Allowable bearing stress(Fp = 0.9*Fy) Fp = 225.00 N/mm2
Nominal stress check(fp/Fp) = 0.07 <=1, OK

B.Shear stress check(Eye Portion)

Shear Area on Eye Portion

As= ((Rm-Dh/2)*Tm+(Rc1-Dh/2)*Tc1*2+(Rc2-Dh/2)*Tc2*2)*2 As = 760.00 mm2
Shear Stress on eye portion(fs=P/As) fs = 7.89 N/mm2
Allowable shear stress(Fs = 0.4*Fy) Fs = 100.00 N/mm2
Nominal stress check(fs/Fs) = 0.08 <=1, OK

16
C.Tensile and bending stress check

Tensile area for padeye, A=Tm*Lm+(Ws1*Ts1+Ws2*Ts2)*2 A = 1600.00 mm2

Shape center to hole center line e = 0 mm
("+" means shape center on right, "-" means on left)
Out plane inertia moment(Ixx):

Distance
from
Neutral
Centroid Yn = axis to Itransfer Iself
b h A=bxh A * Yn
S.No h/2 individual A * Y2 (b * h3/12)
centroid
(γ -(h/2))
Y

mm mm2 mm mm3 mm mm4 mm4

1 80 20 1600 10 16000 0 0 53333.33333
SUM = 1600 10 16000 0 0 53333.33333

Out plane inertia moment Ixx = 5.33E+04 mm4

In plane inertia moment(Izz):

Distance
from
Neutral
Centroid Yn = axis to Itransfer Iself
b h A=bxh A * Yn
S.No h/2 individual A * Y2 (b * h3/12)
centroid
(γ -(h/2))
Y

mm mm2 mm mm3 mm mm4 mm4

1 20 80 1600 40 64000 0 0 853333.3333
SUM = 1600 40 64000 0 0 853333.3333

In plane inertia moment Izz = 8.53E+05 mm4

Force for out plane, Po=0.05*P + P*cosq1*sinq2 Po = 0.60 kN

In plane bending moment, Mi=Ph*Hh Mi = 0.00 kN-mm
Out plane bending moment, Mo=Po*Hh Mo = 90.00 kN-mm

D.Stress Check for Point A

Tensile stress, fa=Pv/A fa = 0.00 kN/mm2

In plane bending stress
fbi=Mi*(Lm/2 + abs(e))/Izz fbi = 0.00 kN/mm2
Out plane bending stress, fbo=Mo*(Tm/2 )/Ixx fbo = 0.02 kN/mm2
Nominal stress check

17
fa/0.6Fy+fbi/0.66Fy+fbo/0.66Fy = 0.13 <=1.0, OK

Von Mises stress, fvon = ((fa+fbi+fbo)2+3*fsh12)0.5 fvon = 0.02 kN/mm2

Von Mises check, fvon / (0.8*Fy) = 0.10 <=1.0, OK

E.Combined Stress Check:

Padeye area, Ap = Lm x Tm Ap = 1600.00 mm2

Moment of inertia of the section

I2z=TmLm3/12 I2z = 8.53E+05 mm4
Z2z=I2z/0.5Lm Z2z = 21333.33 mm3
I2x=LmTm3/12 I2x = 5.33E+04 mm4
Z2x = I2x/0.5Tm Z2x = 5333.33 mm3

Axial stress,sa = Pv /Ap σa = 0.00 N/mm2

Inplane Bending stress,sby=Ph x Hh /Z2z σby = 0.00 N/mm2
Out of plane Bending stress, sbx=Po x Hh / Z2x σbx = 0.02 N/mm2

σ = σa+ σby + σbx ≤ 1.0 σ = 0.02 <=1.0, OK

F.Weld thickness of Pad eye:

Yield stress of the weld fyweld = 480 N/mm2

Design strength of the fillet weld = 0.3fyweld

= 0.3x480
= 144 N/mm2
Weld size provided s = 6.00 mm
Length of the weld provided Lweld = 160 mm

Strength of the weld = 0.7*s*Lweld*Strength of the Weld

= 0.7x6x160x144
= 96.77 kN

Actual force in the Beam = 6.00 kN

96.77 > 6.00
SAFE
Factor of safety 96.77/6 = 16.128

18
3 CONCLUSION

Concluding the analysis and design of the skid structure, we can state that:

 Section profiles provided for the skid structure satisfies the stress ratio limits.
 Utilization ratio satisfied and found within the limits.
 The actual stress in lifting Pad eye is within allowable limit
 If any changes in inputs, (Pipe supports, Equipment GA) this report will be updated,
 Please increase the pad eye hole diameter from 20mm to 22mm when using 19mm pin
dia. Shackle to avoid the collision between shackle and pad eye.

19