001 DA 0330 1617 LEC+2018 106237 Amended Further+Assessment+of+the+Remaining+Life

JASMINCO RESOURCES
PAVEMENT REMAINING LIFE REPORT: TIYCES LANE, HUME

HIGHWAY TO PROPOSED QUARRY ENTRANCE
REPORT NO. R2009142
VER REV REVISION DESCRIPTION VER. DATE PREPARED REVIEWED

BY BY
th
1 0 Draft report for client review 28 Apr 09 D. Scruby J. Erskine
Revision of analysis to account alternate st

1 1 31 Oct 18 J. Erskine
truck type and updated local traffic
th
1 2 Issued as Final 7 Nov 18 J. Erskine
Winner Winner Winner Finalist Winner Winner Featured in
Gold Award New or NSW Eng National Eng. Most Innovative Export award Australian
Specialist Improved Excellence Excellence Product Technology
Services Technique Awards Awards Show Case
R2009142 Report Date:7th November 2018

Ver.:1 Rev:2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pavement Management Services (PMS) was contracted by Jasminco Resources to undertake a

pavement structural evaluation and provide a remaining life assessment on the road pavement of
Tiyces Lane, Goulburn between the Hume Highway and the proposed Quarry Entrance.
4
Based on the traffic data provided a total 20 yr design traffic volume of 2.19x10 ESA’s was derived for
5
the unloaded lane 1 and 1.11x10 ESA’s for the loaded lane 2 and has been considered to remain
constant for the entire project section. The results of the remaining life assessment indicate that Tiyces
Lane overall has sufficient structural capacity to carry the design traffic volumes based on pure
empirical methods.
The results of the structural testing indicate that the base material is of a variable quality ranging from
fair to good quality with an overall characteristic modulus of 317 MPa in the prescribed direction and
325 MPa in the counter direction. The subbase material was found to be of an average to very poor
quality and again highly variable throughout the project section but typically very poor quality. The
characteristic modulus was found to be 44 MPa and 45 MPa respectively for the unloaded and loaded
lanes. The high variability observed in the subbase modulus values may be attributed to possible
differences between the assumed subbase thickness of 200 mm and the actual thicknesses, which are
unknown. The subgrade material is of variable quality ranging from poor to fair quality but typically fair
with an overall characteristic modulus in the prescribed and counter lanes of 57 MPa and 67 MPa
respectively.
At present the stiffness of the base material supports the remaining life results, which suggest that there
is sufficient capacity in the pavement to carry the design traffic volumes. Whilst the stiffness of the
pavement is variable this variability does not impact the empirical remaining life results presented as the
analysis uses the deflection (beam) values only, which are independent of the pavement thickness.
.
.
R2009142 Page 1 Report Date: :7th November 2018

Ver.:1 Rev:2
Table of Contents
PAGE
Executive Summary 1
1 Introduction 3
1.1 Introduction and Background 3
1.2 Objective 3
1.3 Scope of Work 3
1.4 Location Details 3
1.5 Referenced Documents 4
2 Method and Assumptions 5
2.1 Test Methods of Survey 5
2.1.1 Design Traffic Analysis 5
2.1.2 Remaining Life and Overlay Requirements based on Design Chart Method 6
3 Pavement Condition Results 7
3.1 Structural Assessment 7
3.1.1 Design Traffic 7
3.1.2 FWD Test Results 7
3.1.3 Empirical Remaining Life (ESA’s) 8
4 Conclusions and Recommendations 9
Appendix A – Design Traffic Volumes 10
Appendix B – FWD Deflection Test Results 11
Appendix C – Design Chart Remaining Life Results 12

Ver.:1 Rev:2
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction and Background
Pavement Management Services (PMS) was contracted by Jasminco Resources to undertake a
pavement structural evaluation and provide a remaining life assessment on the road pavement of
Tiyces Lane, Goulburn between the Hume Highway and the proposed Quarry Entrance.
To undertake the pavement investigation and prepare the remaining life report, Pavement Management
th
Services undertook Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing on the existing pavement on 30 March
2009. Based on the FWD testing, the values for deflection and curvature were determined and the
remaining life for the pavement assessed.
1.2 Objective
The objective of this report was to determine the current structural capacity and remaining life of existing
pavement of Tiyces Lane.
1.3 Scope of Work

The scope of work covered:
FWD testing of Tiyces Lane for approximately 2km from the Hume Highway.
Determine design traffic volumes for Tiyces Lane comprising local traffic and additional quarry
truck volumes considering both loaded and unloaded movements from the quarry.
Assess the remaining life of the existing pavement.
1.4 Location Details

The extent of Tiyces Lane assessed extends south from the Hume Highway for approximately 2km to
the proposed Quarry entrance. Table 1-1 following, summarises the details used for this project and
Figure 1-1 following following provides an illustration of the site tested.
Table 1-1 Location Details
Section Identifier Lane Start Location End Location Length (m)
Tiyces 000001A1 Prescribed (Lane 1) Hume Highway Proposed Quarry Entrance 2000
Lane 000001A2 Counter (Lane 2) Proposed Quarry Entrance Hume Highway 2000
Figure 1-1 Tiyces Lane Site Location

Ver.:1 Rev:2
Testing was performed along the length of Tiyces Lane between the extents described in Table 1-1.
Each road surveyed was considered as a two lane rural road with one lane in each direction and testing
was undertaken in the outer wheelpath of each lane. For the purposes of this report the following lane
naming convention has been used as illustrated in Figure 1-2 following.
Figure 1-2 Testing Lane Naming Convention
1.5 Referenced Documents

1. ASTM D4694 “Standard Test Method for Deflections with a Falling-Weight-Type Impulse Load
Device” American Society for Testing Materials, Conshohocken, PA, 2002.
2. PMS-TP4-FWD “Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Test Procedure” PMS, Sydney, 2000.
3. Austroads Pavement Design “Guide to Pavement Technology Part 5: Pavement Evaluation and
Treatment Design”, Austroads, 2008.
4. Austroads Pavement Design “Guide to Pavement Technology Part 2: Pavement Structural

Design”, Austroads, 2008.
5. “Traffic Impact Statement (Amended)” Laterals, November 2018.

Ver.:1 Rev:2
2 METHOD AND ASSUMPTIONS
2.1 Test Methods of Survey
th
The FWD testing was conducted in accordance with ASTM D4694 [1] and PMS-TP4-FWD [2] on 30
March 2009 and measured the pavement condition at 100m intervals. This testing was staggered in the
adjacent lane as shown in Figure 2-1 following. The FWD measured at each test point the peak applied
load and peak deflections from 9 geophones, with spacing ranging from under the centre of the load to
a distance of 1.5m from the load. The target load of the testing was 40kN or approximately 566kPa
based on a 300mm diameter loading plate. The deflection and curvature readings were determined from
the FWD testing, based on the Austroads Guide to Pavement Technology - Part 5 [3].
Figure 2-1 FWD Testing Pattern
2.1.1 Design Traffic Analysis

Road traffic includes a mixture of vehicles ranging from light to heavy vehicles and all vehicles
contribute to the structural deterioration of the pavement though light vehicle have a much lower impact
when compared to heavy vehicles. To design a pavement structure within a defined period of time, the
traffic is considered one of the most important factors.
The design traffic of Tiyces Lane was determined from a combination of local traffic 12 bin vehicle
classification data and revised quarry truck movements supplied by representatives of Jasminco
Resources. The revised quarry truck proposed to transport material along Tiyces Lane is a 5-axle Iveco
Stralis truck with configurations as shown in Figure 2-2 following. The design traffic volumes of the
loaded and unloaded quarry trucks have been determined from the loaded and unloaded axle weight
distributions provided in Figure 2-2. According to the Traffic Impact Statement (Amended) [5] the
following maximum traffic movements have been determined based on the proposed annual quarry
3
output of 30,000m with each cubic metre assumed to weigh 2 tonnes.: :
3
30,000m x 2 = 60,000 tonnes per annum
= 1,320 tonnes per week over 45.5 weeks
= 240 tonnes per day over 5.5 days
= 13.33 truck loads per day
= 14 truck loads per day
= 1 truck load each 43 minutes between 7.00am and 5.00pm weekdays
For the purposes of determining the design traffic volumes in accordance with The Guide to Pavement
Technology Part 2: Pavement Structural Design published by Austroads in 2008 [4] the above figures
have been converted to an equivalent average annual daily traffic figure. This has been determined as
14 truck loads per day x (5.5 / 7 days) x (45.5 / 52 weeks) = 9.6 trucks (10) per day. A design period of
20 years has been adopted along with a long term growth rate of 2.0% equal to the historical growth.

Ver.:1 Rev:2
Figure 2-2 5-Axle Dog
2.1.2 Remaining Life and Overlay Requirements based on Design Chart Method
The empirical design chart based approach was used in the determination of the structural life of the
pavement; the normalised deflection and curvature readings were related to the structural life in
accordance with Part 5 of the Austroads Guide to Pavement Technology [3]. The following assumptions
were made in undertaking this analysis:
• The remaining life and overlay requirements assume that the pavement is flexible and does not
comprise cemented materials.
• The pavement surface comprises a 2 coat seal with a thickness of approximately 25mm and
unbound granular material with a total depth of 220mm from chainage 0.000km to
approximately 1.000km.
• The pavement comprise an unsealed unbound granular material with a total depth of 200mm
from 1.000 km to 2.050 km
• A seasonal moisture factor of 1.0 has been used on the basis that there is no defined wet/dry
season at the site. This was determined utilising Bureau of Meteorology historical rainfall data
from Goulburn which showed generally consistent rainfall patterns throughout the year.
Any assessment of pavement remaining life on the basis of the empirical design chart method is subject
to the inherent limitations of empirical based methods. The more fundamentally based mechanistic-
empirical approach, utilising material characteristics such as layer modulus and environmental
conditions provides a higher level of confidence in the assessment of remaining life, subject to the
constraints of having accurate pavement profiles.

Ver.:1 Rev:2
3 PAVEMENT CONDITION RESULTS
3.1 Structural Assessment
3.1.1 Design Traffic
Twenty year design traffic volumes were determined using the traffic count and daily observed data plus
the quarry trucks for each road. Table 3-1 summarises the design traffic calculations for each direction
at the two locations. Despite the loaded lane has the higher design traffic volume relative to the
unloaded lane the overall design traffic volumes are considered to be low.
Table 3-1 Design Traffic
Design Traffic
Identifier Road Direction Source Reference
(ESA’s) (1)
4
Local 1.35x10 DT2009142-1
3
000001A1 Tiyces Lane Unloaded Quarry 8.42x10 DT2009142-2
4
Total 2.19x10 N/A
4
Local 1.35x10 DT2017152-1
4
000001A2 Tiyces Lane Loaded Quarry 9.71x10 DT2009142-3
5
Total 1.11x10 N/A
(1) Total Design Traffic is calculated as Local plus Quarry traffic
3.1.2 FWD Test Results

The results of the structural testing indicate that the base material in both directions is of a fair to good
quality with an overall characteristic modulus of 317 MPa in the prescribed direction and 325 MPa in the
counter direction. It should also be noted that the base modulus varies substantially in both the
prescribed and counter direction.
The subbase material is of an average to very poor quality and highly variable throughout the project
th
section but typically very poor quality. The characteristic modulus based on a 90 percentile level of
confidence is 44 MPa and 45 MPa respectively in the unloaded (Lane 1) and loaded (Lane 2) directions.
The high variability observed in the subbase modulus values may be attributed to difference between
assumption of the subbase layer comprising 200 mm of existing gravel and actual thicknesses which
are unknown. As this analysis is based on empirical methods and the modulus results aren’t used in the
analysis but rather are provided for additional supporting / reference purposes such discrepancies will
not affect the interpretation of the final results. The sub grade material is of poor to fair quality and highly
variable but typically fair with an overall characteristic modulus in the prescribed and counter lanes of 57
MPa and 67 MPa respectively.
At present the stiffness of the base material suggests that there is sufficient capacity in the pavement to
carry the design traffic volumes, though there is one area of concern between 0.450 km and 0.500 km in
both lanes with Lane 1 exhibiting the greatest deficiency.
The FWD testing results can be found in Appendix A. Results have been presented with the chainage
values increasing from Hume Highway to the proposed quarry entrance.

Ver.:1 Rev:2
3.1.3 Empirical Remaining Life (ESA’s)
The remaining life of the pavement has been assessed using the Austroads empirically derived Design
Chart Method using the ppeak deflection to assess the number of standard axle repetitions to failure in
terms of permanent deformation. This in turn, based on the current and proposed quarry traffic volumes
for each direction has been used to determine the remaining life in terms of years.
Table 3-2 Remaining Life Results (Years)
Existing (No Quarry) 5 Axle Truck Tested

Road Identifier
Average < 10 yrs Average < 10 yrs Locations
000001A1 20 0 20 0 21
Tiyces Lane
000001A2 20 0 20 0 20
Total 20 0 20 0 41
The average remaining life for Tiyces Lane considering the existing local traffic in isolation and the local
traffic plus proposed quarry trucks was found to be 20 years for both the loaded and unloaded lanes.
While the location in Lane 1 at 0.450 km exhibited the highest deflection as this is in the unloaded
direction there is sufficient structural capacity to carry the design traffic volumes based on pure
empirical methods.
The empirical remaining life calculations sheets can be found in Appendix A

Ver.:1 Rev:2
4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4
Based on the traffic data provided a total 20 yr design traffic volume of 2.19x10 ESA’s was derived for
5
the unloaded lane 1 and 1.11x10 ESA’s for the loaded lane 2 and has been considered to remain
constant for the entire project section. The results of the remaining life assessment indicate that Tiyces
Lane overall has sufficient structural capacity to carry the design traffic volumes based on pure
empirical methods.
The results of the structural testing indicate that the base material is of a variable quality ranging from
fair to good quality with an overall characteristic modulus of 317 MPa in the prescribed direction and
325 MPa in the counter direction. The subbase material was found to be of an average to very poor
quality and again highly variable throughout the project section but typically very poor quality. The
characteristic modulus was found to be 44 MPa and 45 MPa respectively for the unloaded and loaded
lanes. The high variability observed in the subbase modulus values may be attributed to possible
differences between the assumed subbase thickness of 200 mm and the actual thicknesses, which are
unknown. The subgrade material is of variable quality ranging from poor to fair quality but typically fair
with an overall characteristic modulus in the prescribed and counter lanes of 57 MPa and 67 MPa
respectively.
At present the stiffness of the base material supports the remaining life results, which suggest that there
is sufficient capacity in the pavement to carry the design traffic volumes. Whilst the stiffness of the
pavement is variable this variability does not impact the empirical remaining life results presented as the
analysis uses the deflection (beam) values only, which are independent of the pavement thickness.

Ver.:1 Rev:2
APPENDIX A – DESIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Ver.:1 Rev:2
Austroads Guide
to Pavement
Technology1
Unit 7b, 26 Powers Road
Design Traffic Calculation Sheet Seven Hills, NSW 2147
Report Date: 25-Oct-18 Client: Jasminco Resources Pty Ltd Prepared By: James Erskine
Project No.: 2009142 Report No.: DT2009142-1
Location: Tiyces Lane - Local Traffic Direction: N/A
Road Type: Rural Carriageway: Single
Method: Weigh-In-Motion Design Lane: Left Lane
Traffic Load: Moderate to Heavy Design Period: 20 years 7.4.2
Projected Growth Rate: 2.0% 7.4.5
Date Collected: from 7-Mar-17 Historical Growth Rate: 2.0%
to 13-Mar-17
Intended Date of Opening: 1-Dec-18 1.72 years to start of work
Average Daily Traffic Figures (Vehicles/Lane/Day)

Vehicle Vehicles/
SAST SADT TAST TADT TRDT QADT NHVAG
Class Lane/Day
1 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 18
4 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 2
5 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 3
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 6
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 (Other) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 102 14 9 0 4 2 0 29
Proportion of Each Axle 1.000 0.483 0.310 0.000 0.138 0.069 0.000
Group
Total HV/Day 13
Total HV Axle Groups/Day 29
Calculated NHVAG 2.23
Traffic Design Figures

Current AADT: 106 7.4.4
DF: 0.5 7.4.4
%HV: 12.7 7.4.4
LDF: 1 7.4.3
CGF: 24.3 7.4.5
Presumptive NHVAG: N/A 7.4.6
Traffic Load Distribution Calculations 7.6.2

2 2
Standard Axle Repetitions per Heavy Vehicle Axle Group Standard Axle Repetitions per ESA
Axle Group ESA/HVAG ESA/HV SAR5/HVAG SAR7/HVAG SAR12/HVAG SAR5/ESA SAR7/ESA SAR12/ESA
SAST 0.089 0.199 0.059 0.025 0.003 0.580 0.250 0.030
SADT 0.011 0.025 0.005 0.001 0.000 0.048 0.009 0.000
TAST 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TADT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TRDT 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.000
QADT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total 0.101 0.226 0.064 0.026 0.003 0.630 0.259 0.030 Table 7.8
Design Traffic Loading Calculations 7.6.3
Design Traffic (ESA)

NDT 1.33E+05 Equation 7.1
Overall Damage DESA 1.35E+04 Equation 7.4
Design Standard Axle Repetitions (DSAR)

Fatigue of asphalt DSAR5 8.47E+03 Equation 7.5
Rutting and shape loss DSAR7 3.48E+03 Equation 7.5
Fatigue of cemented materials DSAR12 4.10E+02 Equation 7.5
1. These design traffic calculations follow the methodology of the Austroads Guide to Pavement Technology Part 2 Section 7 and Appendix C to G
2. Method of traffic collection determines whether results are calculated or presumptive values are used
Pavement Management Services Pty Ltd, ABN 64 002 245 329, Australia
ver:2 rev:0 Page 1 of 1 PMS-QF4-007

Austroads Guide
to Pavement
Technology1
Location: Tiyces Lane - Iveco Stralis (Unloaded) Direction: N/A
Date Collected: from 1-Jul-18 Historical Growth Rate: 0.0%
to 1-Jul-18
Intended Date of Opening: 1-Jul-18 0.00 years to start of work

Vehicle Vehicles/
Class Lane/Day
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 (Other) 10 10 10 0 0 10 0 30
Total 10 10 10 0 0 10 0 30
Group
Total HV/Day 10

DF: 0.5 7.4.4
%HV: 100.0 7.4.4
LDF: 1 7.4.3
CGF: 20.0 7.4.5

2 2
SAST 0.062 0.185 0.041 0.017 0.002 0.527 0.227 0.028
SADT 0.012 0.036 0.005 0.001 0.000 0.067 0.013 0.000
TAST 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TADT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TRDT 0.003 0.010 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.001 0.000
QADT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total 0.077 0.231 0.047 0.019 0.002 0.607 0.241 0.028 Table 7.8



Austroads Guide
to Pavement
Technology1
Location: Tiyces Lane - Iveco Stralis (Loaded) Direction: N/A
Date Collected: from 1-Jul-18 Historical Growth Rate: 0.0%
to 1-Jul-18
Intended Date of Opening: 1-Jul-18 0.00 years to start of work

Vehicle Vehicles/
Class Lane/Day
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 (Other) 10 10 10 0 0 10 0 30
Total 10 10 10 0 0 10 0 30
Group
Total HV/Day 10

DF: 0.5 7.4.4
%HV: 100.0 7.4.4
LDF: 1 7.4.3
CGF: 20.0 7.4.5

2 2
SAST 0.356 1.067 0.362 0.374 0.405 0.408 0.421 0.457
SADT 0.069 0.206 0.046 0.021 0.003 0.052 0.024 0.003
TAST 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TADT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
TRDT 0.462 1.386 0.501 0.590 0.888 0.566 0.666 1.002
QADT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total 0.886 2.659 0.909 0.985 1.296 1.026 1.111 1.462 Table 7.8



APPENDIX B – FWD DEFLECTION TEST RESULTS

Ver.:1 Rev:2
FWD/HWD Structural Test Report - Deflection Results Seven Hills, NSW 2147
Test Method: QT211 Client: Jasminco Resources Pty Ltd

Testing Date: 30/03/2009 Job No: 2018309
Operator: Jason Hawkens Target Load (kN): 40 Report No: DR2018309-3
Test Equipment: FWD-016 Smoothing: No Client Section ID: 000001A1
Tiyces Lane Road Id: 1

Lane: 1
from Hume Highway to Proposed Quarry Entrance
Block: A
Measured Deflection Results (µ m) Normalised Deflection Results (µ m)
Peak Temperature
Distance from Load (mm) Distance from Load (mm) ( OC) FWD GDA94
Station Lane Wheel Load
(km) Path (kPa) 0 200 300 450 600 750 900 1200 1500 0 200 300 450 600 750 900 1200 1500 Air Surface Defl. Curv. Latitude Longitude Local Comment
0.050 1 OWP 693 541 294 169 83 51 36 31 18 15 442 240 138 68 42 29 25 15 12 21.9 28.3 0.44 0.20 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.150 1 OWP 1648 687 326 172 64 37 33 21 11 10 236 112 59 22 13 11 7 4 3 20.0 28.6 0.24 0.12 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.250 1 OWP 694 414 216 84 28 12 8 6 6 2 338 176 68 23 10 7 5 5 2 21.6 28.9 0.34 0.16 40.0000000 3.0000000 ND
0.350 1 OWP 694 569 393 264 134 62 38 24 17 14 464 320 215 109 51 31 20 14 11 21.7 29.1 0.46 0.14 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.450 1 OWP 692 1950 915 476 263 167 118 78 47 24 1595 748 389 215 137 97 64 38 20 21.3 29.3 1.60 0.85 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.550 1 OWP 697 542 241 113 49 23 11 6 4 4 440 196 92 40 19 9 5 3 3 21.7 29.4 0.44 0.24 40.0000000 3.0000000 ND
0.650 1 OWP 699 835 503 316 184 134 109 89 67 50 676 407 256 149 108 88 72 54 40 21.6 29.3 0.68 0.27 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.750 1 OWP 697 668 409 273 159 103 76 52 34 23 542 332 222 129 84 62 42 28 19 22.2 29.5 0.54 0.21 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.850 1 OWP 706 669 399 226 134 87 56 35 19 11 536 320 181 107 70 45 28 15 9 22.3 29.5 0.54 0.22 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.950 1 OWP 694 547 310 201 125 85 60 47 28 23 446 253 164 102 69 49 38 23 19 22.0 29.5 0.45 0.19 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.050 1 OWP 701 877 428 260 153 88 56 39 24 18 708 346 210 124 71 45 31 19 15 21.8 29.6 0.71 0.36 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.150 1 OWP 692 682 369 225 126 85 60 43 25 17 558 302 184 103 70 49 35 20 14 22.6 29.6 0.56 0.26 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.250 1 OWP 706 872 536 335 166 96 66 47 33 23 699 430 269 133 77 53 38 26 18 22.7 29.6 0.70 0.27 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.350 1 OWP 696 588 356 249 151 109 77 57 36 22 478 289 202 123 89 63 46 29 18 21.6 29.6 0.48 0.19 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.450 1 OWP 696 613 430 256 144 86 61 47 34 25 498 350 208 117 70 50 38 28 20 21.0 29.6 0.50 0.15 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.550 1 OWP 694 352 173 114 60 38 27 23 14 10 287 141 93 49 31 22 19 11 8 21.9 29.5 0.29 0.15 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.650 1 OWP 704 517 329 193 103 58 40 25 16 10 416 264 155 83 47 32 20 13 8 22.8 29.6 0.42 0.15 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.750 1 OWP 1060 522 242 121 55 33 20 15 9 5 279 129 65 29 18 11 8 5 3 21.9 29.8 0.28 0.15 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.850 1 OWP 1646 647 242 125 39 14 8 10 11 7 222 83 43 13 5 3 3 4 2 22.9 30.7 0.22 0.14 40.0000000 3.0000000 ND
Ver:2 Rev:0 Page 1 of 4 Form No. TP5-R-001
Peak Temperature
1.950 1 OWP 701 868 454 274 127 57 32 16 4 7 701 366 221 103 46 26 13 3 6 23.8 30.8 0.70 0.34 40.0000000 3.0000000 ND
2.050 1 OWP 692 536 301 152 82 61 47 37 28 22 438 246 124 67 50 38 30 23 18 24.8 31.0 0.44 0.19 40.0000000 3.0000000
Average 22.1 29.6 0.53 0.24

Standard Deviation 1.0 0.6 0.29 0.16
10th Percentile 0.28 0.14
Survey Notes
1 Acronyms:IWP - Inner Wheel Path of the tested lane, ND - Non Decreasing deflection bowl, RT - Retested owing to poor deflection bowl.
2 Lane 1 is in the prescribed direction whilst lane 2 is in the counter direction and all station values presented are increasing in the direction of lane 1 (prescribed lane).
3 Where negative curvature values occur as a result of Non-Decreasing deflection bowl data, they have been set to 0.00mm
4 IWP results were measured within the existing central pavement of the lane tested.
Prepared By: Reviewed By:
James Erskine James Erskine

Senior Pavement Engineer Senior Pavement Engineer
06-Nov-18 06-Nov-18
FWD/HWD Structural Test Report - Deflection Results Seven Hills, NSW 2147
Test Method: QT211 Client: Jasminco Resources Pty Ltd

Testing Date: 30/03/2009 Job No: 2018309
Operator: Jason Hawkens Target Load (kN): 40 Report No: DR2018309-3
Test Equipment: FWD-016 Smoothing: No Client Section ID: 000001A2
Tiyces Lane Road Id: 1

Lane: 1
from Proposed Quarry Entrance to Hume Highway
Block: A
Peak Temperature
0.100 2 OWP 1033 599 304 148 72 44 27 21 14 9 328 167 81 39 24 15 12 8 5 23.6 30.7 0.33 0.16 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.200 2 OWP 1028 496 225 118 44 19 14 14 8 7 273 124 65 24 10 8 8 4 4 23.7 30.7 0.27 0.15 40.0000000 3.0000000 ND
0.300 2 OWP 696 499 267 102 42 27 21 16 11 7 406 217 83 34 22 17 13 9 6 23.7 30.7 0.41 0.19 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.400 2 OWP 698 606 333 165 58 28 18 15 7 4 491 270 134 47 23 15 12 6 3 24.0 30.7 0.49 0.22 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.500 2 OWP 704 1282 820 520 328 231 167 120 78 44 1031 659 418 264 186 134 96 63 35 23.8 30.7 1.03 0.37 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.600 2 OWP 696 779 426 260 148 95 70 53 36 26 633 346 211 120 77 57 43 29 21 23.5 30.7 0.63 0.29 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.700 2 OWP 697 988 555 317 195 127 92 70 45 33 802 451 257 158 103 75 57 37 27 23.9 30.9 0.80 0.35 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.800 2 OWP 700 730 429 229 120 76 52 39 20 12 590 347 185 97 61 42 32 16 10 23.2 30.9 0.59 0.24 40.0000000 3.0000000
0.900 2 OWP 700 903 570 338 205 142 111 94 72 58 730 461 273 166 115 90 76 58 47 23.3 31.1 0.73 0.27 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.000 2 OWP 701 854 428 279 140 74 56 38 25 21 689 346 225 113 60 45 31 20 17 23.4 31.1 0.69 0.34 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.100 2 OWP 701 598 320 232 75 33 16 10 6 3 483 258 187 61 27 13 8 5 2 23.6 31.1 0.48 0.23 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.200 2 OWP 690 453 258 159 91 60 40 29 19 12 372 212 130 75 49 33 24 16 10 23.8 31.2 0.37 0.16 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.300 2 OWP 669 1017 502 259 124 64 42 28 25 14 860 425 219 105 54 36 24 21 12 24.2 31.2 0.86 0.44 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.400 2 OWP 690 644 389 216 113 55 34 21 17 8 528 319 177 93 45 28 17 14 7 24.5 31.2 0.53 0.21 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.500 2 OWP 695 590 370 265 135 87 56 40 25 18 480 301 216 110 71 46 33 20 15 24.3 31.3 0.48 0.18 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.600 2 OWP 695 416 257 179 99 67 49 34 22 17 339 209 146 81 55 40 28 18 14 23.3 31.3 0.34 0.13 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.700 2 OWP 698 784 409 180 96 61 38 26 17 13 636 332 146 78 49 31 21 14 11 24.0 31.3 0.64 0.30 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.800 2 OWP 697 528 303 181 100 58 34 22 14 9 429 246 147 81 47 28 18 11 7 23.4 31.3 0.43 0.18 40.0000000 3.0000000
1.900 2 OWP 1033 475 166 108 76 60 50 44 31 26 260 91 59 42 33 27 24 17 14 23.7 31.4 0.26 0.17 40.0000000 3.0000000
Peak Temperature
2.000 2 OWP 691 481 262 125 53 27 18 12 8 6 394 215 102 43 22 15 10 7 5 23.3 31.4 0.39 0.18 40.0000000 3.0000000
Average 23.7 31.0 0.54 0.24

Standard Deviation 0.4 0.3 0.21 0.09
Survey Notes
1 Acronyms:IWP - Inner Wheel Path of the tested lane, ND - Non Decreasing deflection bowl, RT - Retested owing to poor deflection bowl.
2 Lane 1 is in the prescribed direction whilst lane 2 is in the counter direction and all station values presented are increasing in the direction of lane 1 (prescribed lane).
3 Where negative curvature values occur as a result of Non-Decreasing deflection bowl data, they have been set to 0.00mm
4 IWP results were measured within the existing central pavement of the lane tested.

06-Nov-18 06-Nov-18
APPENDIX C – DESIGN CHART REMAINING LIFE RESULTS

Ver.:1 Rev:2
Remaining Life and Overlay Requirements - Design Charts Method 2,3 Seven Hills, NSW 2147
Report Date: 06-Nov-18 Client: Jasminco Resources Pty Ltd Prepared By: James Erskine
Project No.: 2018309 Growth Rate: 2.0%
Report No.: R2018309 Design Period: 20
Location: 000001A1 - Tiyces Lane from Hume Highway to Proposed Quarry Entrance Design Traffic Intensity: 2.19E+04
Test Method: QT211 Existing Pavement: Flexible without Cemented Materials
Analysis Method: FPMS-QP4-002 Overlay Type: Asphalt
Tested By: Jason Hawkens Design Deflection: 1.83
Testing Date: 30-Mar-09 WMAPT: 22
Test Equipment: FWD-016 Overlay Adjustment Factor: 0.94
Seasonal Moisture Variation: 1.0
Surface FWD Measured Temperature Adjusted Permanent Deformation Fatigue
Station Lane Wheel Thickness Temp Deflection Curvature DSF CSF Adjustment Factor Deflection Curvature Remaining Life Overlay (mm) Remaining Life Overlay (mm) Comment
Type
(km) Path (mm) ( OC) (mm) (mm) Deflection Curvature (mm) (mm) ESA's Yrs Granular Asphalt4 ESA's 8 Yrs 8 Asphalt 8,9
0.050 1 OWP Seal 25 28.3 0.44 0.20 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.20 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.150 1 OWP Seal 25 28.6 0.24 0.12 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.12 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.250 1 OWP Seal 25 28.9 0.34 0.16 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37 0.16 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.350 1 OWP Seal 25 29.1 0.46 0.14 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.14 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.450 1 OWP Seal 25 29.3 1.60 0.85 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.76 0.85 3.29E+04 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.550 1 OWP Seal 25 29.4 0.44 0.24 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.24 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.650 1 OWP Seal 25 29.3 0.68 0.27 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.27 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.750 1 OWP Seal 25 29.5 0.54 0.21 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.21 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.850 1 OWP Seal 25 29.5 0.54 0.22 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.22 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.950 1 OWP Seal 25 29.5 0.45 0.19 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.19 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
1.050 1 OWP Gravel 0 29.6 0.71 0.36 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.36 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
Type
Average 12 29.6 0.53 0.24 0.58 0.24 9.52E+07 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
Standard Deviation 13 0.6 0.29 0.16 0.32 0.16 2.18E+07 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
10th Percentile 0.33 0.14 0.36 0.14 9.00E+07 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
Survey Notes
1 These remaining life and overlay calculations follow the methodology of the Austroads Guide to Pavement Technology Part 5 Appendix E
2 The remaining life and overlay requirements assume that the asphalt surfaced pavement has not been progressively strengthened in stages or has significant remaining asphalt fatigue life
3 The remaining life and overlay requirements assume that the pavement is flexible and does not include any cemented materials, where this is not the case a mechanistic analysis should be undertaken
4 The asphalt overlay thickness to overcome permanent deformation is based on using asphalt with C320 binder, the use of other binders may result in a different thickness required
5 It is possible that a thinner asphalt overlay thickness may overcome fatigue however there would be a higher risk of premature distress in this case and as such it has not been considered
6 The overlay requirements indicate the thickness of additional material required to overcome any structural deficiencies of the pavement based on the pavement consisting of an asphalt wearing course and being
subject to both permanent deformation and fatigue
7 The granular overlay requirements for design traffic volumes up to 1x10^8 ESA's can be derived using the Design Chart Method, while asphalt overlays are limited to a maximum design traffic volume of 1x10^7 ESA'
8 The asphalt fatigue remaining life is calculated considering a minimum 40mm of asphalt overlay
9 The thickness of the asphalt overlay considering fatigue is the minimum required considering the design traffic

06-Nov-18 06-Nov-18
Location: 000001A2 - Tiyces Lane from Proposed Quarry Entrance to Hume Highway Design Traffic Intensity: 1.11E+05
Type
0.100 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.33 0.16 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.16 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.200 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.27 0.15 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.15 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.300 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.41 0.19 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.19 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.400 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.49 0.22 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 0.22 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.500 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 1.03 0.37 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13 0.37 1.03E+06 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.600 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.63 0.29 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.29 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.700 2 OWP Seal 25 30.9 0.80 0.35 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.35 1.26E+07 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.800 2 OWP Seal 25 30.9 0.59 0.24 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.24 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.900 2 OWP Seal 25 31.1 0.73 0.27 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.27 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
Type
Average 11 31.0 0.54 0.24 0.59 0.24 8.59E+07 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
Survey Notes

06-Nov-18 06-Nov-18
Location: 000001A1 - Tiyces Lane from Hume Highway to Proposed Quarry Entrance Design Traffic Intensity: 1.35E+04
Type
0.050 1 OWP Seal 25 28.3 0.44 0.20 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.20 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.150 1 OWP Seal 25 28.6 0.24 0.12 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.12 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.250 1 OWP Seal 25 28.9 0.34 0.16 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37 0.16 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.350 1 OWP Seal 25 29.1 0.46 0.14 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.14 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.450 1 OWP Seal 25 29.3 1.60 0.85 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.76 0.85 3.29E+04 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.550 1 OWP Seal 25 29.4 0.44 0.24 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.24 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.650 1 OWP Seal 25 29.3 0.68 0.27 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.27 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.750 1 OWP Seal 25 29.5 0.54 0.21 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.21 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.850 1 OWP Seal 25 29.5 0.54 0.22 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.22 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.950 1 OWP Seal 25 29.5 0.45 0.19 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.19 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
Type
Average 12 29.6 0.53 0.24 0.58 0.24 9.52E+07 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
Survey Notes

06-Nov-18 06-Nov-18
Location: 000001A2 - Tiyces Lane from Proposed Quarry Entrance to Hume Highway Design Traffic Intensity: 1.35E+04
Type
0.100 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.33 0.16 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.16 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.200 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.27 0.15 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.15 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.300 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.41 0.19 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.19 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.400 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.49 0.22 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 0.22 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.500 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 1.03 0.37 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13 0.37 1.03E+06 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.600 2 OWP Seal 25 30.7 0.63 0.29 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.29 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.700 2 OWP Seal 25 30.9 0.80 0.35 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.35 1.26E+07 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.800 2 OWP Seal 25 30.9 0.59 0.24 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.24 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
0.900 2 OWP Seal 25 31.1 0.73 0.27 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.27 1.00E+08 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
Type
Average 11 31.0 0.54 0.24 0.59 0.24 8.59E+07 20 0 0 N/A N/A N/A
Survey Notes

06-Nov-18 06-Nov-18

001 DA 0330 1617 LEC+2018 106237 Amended Further+Assessment+of+the+Remaining+Life

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

001 DA 0330 1617 LEC+2018 106237 Amended Further+Assessment+of+the+Remaining+Life

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

JASMINCO RESOURCES

PAVEMENT REMAINING LIFE REPORT: TIYCES LANE, HUME

REPORT NO. R2009142

VER REV REVISION DESCRIPTION VER. DATE PREPARED REVIEWED

Revision of analysis to account alternate st

Winner Winner Winner Finalist Winner Winner Featured in

R2009142 Report Date:7th November 2018

Pavement Management Services (PMS) was contracted by Jasminco Resources to undertake a

R2009142 Page 1 Report Date: :7th November 2018

R2009142 Page 2 Report Date: :7th November 2018

1.3 Scope of Work

1.4 Location Details

Table 1-1 Location Details

Section Identifier Lane Start Location End Location Length (m)

Figure 1-1 Tiyces Lane Site Location

Figure 1-2 Testing Lane Naming Convention

1.5 Referenced Documents

4. Austroads Pavement Design “Guide to Pavement Technology Part 2: Pavement Structural

5. “Traffic Impact Statement (Amended)” Laterals, November 2018.

R2009142 Page 4 Report Date: :7th November 2018

Figure 2-1 FWD Testing Pattern

2.1.1 Design Traffic Analysis

= 1,320 tonnes per week over 45.5 weeks

= 240 tonnes per day over 5.5 days

= 13.33 truck loads per day

= 14 truck loads per day

= 1 truck load each 43 minutes between 7.00am and 5.00pm weekdays

R2009142 Page 5 Report Date: :7th November 2018

R2009142 Page 6 Report Date: :7th November 2018

Table 3-1 Design Traffic

3.1.2 FWD Test Results

R2009142 Page 7 Report Date: :7th November 2018

Existing (No Quarry) 5 Axle Truck Tested

The empirical remaining life calculations sheets can be found in Appendix A

R2009142 Page 8 Report Date: :7th November 2018

R2009142 Page 9 Report Date: :7th November 2018

R2009142 Page 10 Report Date: :7th November 2018

Average Daily Traffic Figures (Vehicles/Lane/Day)

Traffic Design Figures

Traffic Load Distribution Calculations 7.6.2

Design Traffic Loading Calculations 7.6.3

Design Traffic (ESA)

Design Standard Axle Repetitions (DSAR)

ver:2 rev:0 Page 1 of 1 PMS-QF4-007

Average Daily Traffic Figures (Vehicles/Lane/Day)

Traffic Design Figures

Traffic Load Distribution Calculations 7.6.2

Design Traffic Loading Calculations 7.6.3

Design Traffic (ESA)

Design Standard Axle Repetitions (DSAR)

ver:2 rev:0 Page 1 of 1 PMS-QF4-007

Average Daily Traffic Figures (Vehicles/Lane/Day)

Traffic Design Figures

Traffic Load Distribution Calculations 7.6.2

Design Traffic Loading Calculations 7.6.3

Design Traffic (ESA)

Design Standard Axle Repetitions (DSAR)

ver:2 rev:0 Page 1 of 1 PMS-QF4-007

R2009142 Page 11 Report Date: :7th November 2018

Test Method: QT211 Client: Jasminco Resources Pty Ltd

Tiyces Lane Road Id: 1

Average 22.1 29.6 0.53 0.24

Prepared By: Reviewed By: