Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Analyzing and comparing diabetic foot between 1991, 2001, and 2011 in
a surgical unit of a tertiary centre in India
Authors: Amit Kumar C. Jain*1, Viswanath S.2
The Journal of Diabetic Foot Complications, 2014; Volume 6, Issue 3, No. 4, Pages 78-81 © All rights reserved.
Abstract:
Diabetes mellitus and its devastating complication, the diabetic foot, are among the major public health problems of
today. The prevalence of both diabetes and diabetic foot has been steadily increasing world-wide. India, which was once
regarded as the diabetic capital of the world, is one of the top three countries with a very high prevalence of diabetics.
We performed a small study at our hospital to learn the actual trend of the diabetic foot over the last three decades. We
reviewed our operating theater register to analyze the status of the diabetic foot in the department of surgery in 1991,
2001, and 2011. Diabetic foot problems accounted for 3.46% of cases in 1991. This number increased to 7.59% by
2011. The major amputation rate, however, showed a declining trend over this timeframe.
INTRODUCTION
Diabetes is a silent killer disease1 which decades in a surgical unit of a tertiary referral
affects all the important organs in the body.2 A hospital.
few years ago India ranked first on the list of the MATERIAL AND METHODS
ten nations most affected with diabetes.3 One
A retrospective study was performed in the
of the common and serious complications of
department of surgery unit of St. John’s Medical
diabetes is the diabetic foot, which often leads to
College, Bangalore, India, a tertiary care referral
amputation, either minor or major.
institute, which also caters to patients from the
The annual incidence of diabetic foot ulcers adjacent states.
is around 3%4, and around 15% of diabetics will
A study was done in our surgical unit by
be affected with foot ulcers during their lifetime.5,6
reviewing the data from our operating theater
Individuals with diabetes have a 30-fold higher
register and comparing the status of diabetic foot
lifetime risk of underlying lower extremity
problems in the years 1991, 2001, and 2011. Data
amputation compared to those without diabetes.5
obtained included age, sex, incidence of diabetic
One study revealed that 40% of diabetic foot
foot in the operative surgical patient, and the type
patients will require amputations.7
of surgery done. The pathological lesion of most
The incidence, and importance of the of the cases could not be determined because
diabetic foot complication, are highlighted by most cases were entered as “diabetic foot”,
the fact that research papers on diabetic foot in and most files/records were not stored at our
Pub-Med have increased from 0.7% in 1980 to institute after 10 years. Accordingly, they were
2.6% in 1998-2004.2 unable to be traced. Over the years our surgery
The aim of our study was to analyze the department gradually expanded, and in 2011
diabetic foot burden over a period of three there were five functional surgical units.
78
The Journal of Diabetic Foot Complications, 2014; Volume 6, Issue 3, No. 4, Pages 78-81 Open access publishing
RESULTS
As shown in Table 1, there were 25 cases
(3.46%) of diabetic foot out of 722 surgeries done
in 1991, 59 cases (7.76%) out of 760 surgeries in
2001, and 50 cases (7.59%) out of 659 cases in
2011.
Table 1. Percent of diabetic foot cases operated in a surgical
unit
1991 3.46
2001 7.76
2011 7.59
Below Knee
1991 57.94 55.28 15.15 12.12 8
Amputation
Above Knee
2001 57.62 53.3 21.2 0 0
Amputation
79
The Journal of Diabetic Foot Complications, 2014; Volume 6, Issue 3, No. 4, Pages 78-81 Open access publishing
DISCUSSION
The prevalence of diabetes, diabetic foot, and amputation differs across countries.8 In fact,
diabetic foot problems currently constitute 2.5% of all diabetes related admissions in the West.9
The rate of major amputations in diabetic patients ranges from 9-24% in the literature.5 In a large
multi-centre study from India,10 around 29.1% underwent major amputation, whereas 70.9% underwent
minor amputation.
In a study by Larsson et al.11 the incidence of diabetic major amputation in Sweden decreased by
78% from 1982 to 1993. In Finland,11 the incidence of major amputation in diabetic patients exhibited
23% from the beginning of the 1990s to the beginning of this millennium.
Our data also showed a huge decline in major amputations in the diabetic patient. In 1991, major
amputations were around 36.35%, then decreased to 12.12% in 2001, and then further declined to 8%
in 2011 in a surgical unit. Although, there is an increase in the percent of patients with diabetic foot
from 3.46% to 7.59%.
There are various reasons for this. An increase in the incidence of diabetes resulted in an
increased incidence of the diabetic foot. The decline in major amputations over the years was due to
improvement in overall healthcare, awareness regarding this complication, early referral to hospitals,
early intervention, and a more conservative approach towards diabetic foot patients. Nonetheless,
there was still not much of an improvement in overall diabetic foot care.12
CONCLUSION
Our study clearly shows that there is undoubtedly an increase in the prevalence of diabetic foot
problems over the three decade periods. In contrast, the overall major amputation rate has declined
significantly from 36.35% in 1991 to 8% in 2011 in a tertiary care referral teaching hospital.
This is the original article (manuscript type). All of the authors contributed to conception, design, manuscript preparation, and final approval of the
article
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
80
The Journal of Diabetic Foot Complications, 2014; Volume 6, Issue 3, No. 4, Pages 78-81 Open access publishing
References
1. Solanki K, Parmar H, Gohil V, Shah S. The surgical management of diabetic foot. NJIRM. 2010;1(4):40-42.
2. Singh S, Pai DR, Yuhhul C. Diabetic foot ulcer. diagnosis and management. Clin Res Foot Ankle. 2013;1:3.
3. Shahi SK, Kumar A. et al. Prevalence of diabetic foot ulcer and associated risk factors in diabetic patients from North India.
J Diab Foot Comp. 2012;4(3):83-91.
4. Clayton W, Elasy TA. A review of the pathophysiology classification and treatment of foot ulcers in diabetic patients. Clinical
Diabetes. 2009;7(2):52-58.
5. Adam MA, Hamza AA, Ibrahim AE. Diabetic septic foot in Omdurman Teaching Hospital. Sudan. JMS. 2009;4(2):129-132.
6. Chalya PL, Mabula JB. Surgical management of diabetic foot ulcers: a Tanzanian university teaching hospital experience.
BMC Reseach Notes. 2011;4:365.
7. Singh BG, Chawla S. Amputation in diabetic patients. MJAFI. 2006;62:36-39.
8. Jain AKC, Varma AK, Mangalanandan, Kumar H. Major amputations in diabetes- an experience from diabetic limb salvage
centre in India. J Diab Foot Comp. 2012;4(3):63-66.
9. Sualiman MU, Salim OEF, Ahmed ME. Major lower limb amputation in diabetics. Khartoum Med J. 2012;5(1):694-698.
10. Viswanathan V, Kumpatla S. Pattern and causes of amputation in diabetic patients- a multicentric study from India. JAPI.
2011;59:1-7.
11. Eskelinen E, Eskelinen A, Alback A, Lepantalo M. Major amputation incidence decreases both in non-diabetic and in
diabetic patients in Helsinki. Scan J Surg. 2006;95:185-189.
12. Shankhdhar K. Living in a country where there are no podiatrists. Podiatry Today. 2008;21(1):97.
81