Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
SISI TV
What is “Performance Appraisal”?
Performance appraisal is a formal management system that provides for the quality
evaluation of the performance of individuals in an organization / company. The assessment is usually
prepared by the direct supervisor of the employee. Employee performance assessment has two
objectives, namely to use the administrative and development. For administrative use include
compensation, promotion, dismissal, downsizing, layoffs. As for the use of development are used to
identify strengths, development planning, training and careers.
From some methods above, SISI TV chose to use two methods, namely the Graphic Rating
Scale method (for appraisal of job performance managers, supervisors, and staff) and Behaviorally
Anchor Rating Scale method (for appraisal of staff only). SISI TV using the Graphic Rating Scale
method of performance appraisal of the employees who have high positions, because this method
has detailed assessment of the performance of each of the tasks given. This method is also possible
to perform a more objective appraisal, because based on work performance. For the staff appraisal,
SISI TV using Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale method for assessing the daily activities of the staff.
But as a comparison, there are also some appraisals of staff using Graphic Rating Scale method.
Here are the results of the performance appraisal of SISI TV’s employee.
Graphic Rating Scale Method
1. Purchasing Manager Performance Appraisal
RATING IDENTIFICATION
1. E Excellent (86 – 100) The result is very satisfied and the performance is above
standard.
2. G Good ( 76 - 85) The result is good enough and the performance is
under control.
3. C Commendable (66 - 75) The result is on average, meet the requirements but still
need some improvement.
4. U Unsatisfactory (55 - 65) The result is not clear and not meet the requirements
5. P Poor (<55) The result is totally not acceptable and the performance
is under the standard.
RATING IDENTIFICATION
1. E Excellent (86 – 100) The result is very satisfied and the performance is above
standard.
2. G Good ( 76 - 85) The result is good enough and the performance is
under control.
3. C Commendable (66 - 75) The result is on average, meet the requirements but still
need some improvement.
4. U Unsatisfactory (55 - 65) The result is not clear and not meet the requirements
5. P Poor (<55) The result is totally not acceptable and the performance
is under the standard.
RATING IDENTIFICATION
1. E Excellent (86 – 100) The result is very satisfied and the performance is above
standard.
2. G Good ( 76 - 85) The result is good enough and the performance is
under control.
3. C Commendable (66 - 75) The result is on average, meet the requirements but still
need some improvement.
4. U Unsatisfactory (55 - 65) The result is not clear and not meet the requirements
5. P Poor (<55) The result is totally not acceptable and the performance
is under the standard.
RATING IDENTIFICATION
1. E Excellent (86 – 100) The result is very satisfied and the performance is above
standard.
2. G Good ( 76 - 85) The result is good enough and the performance is
under control.
3. C Commendable (66 - 75) The result is on average, meet the requirements but still
need some improvement.
4. U Unsatisfactory (55 - 65) The result is not clear and not meet the requirements
5. P Poor (<55) The result is totally not acceptable and the performance
is under the standard.
RATING IDENTIFICATION
1. E Excellent (86 – 100) The result is very satisfied and the performance is above
standard.
2. G Good ( 76 - 85) The result is good enough and the performance is
under control.
3. C Commendable (66 - 75) The result is on average, meet the requirements but still
need some improvement.
4. U Unsatisfactory (55 - 65) The result is not clear and not meet the requirements
5. P Poor (<55) The result is totally not acceptable and the performance
is under the standard.
RATING IDENTIFICATION
1. E Excellent (86 – 100) The result is very satisfied and the performance is above
standard.
2. G Good ( 76 - 85) The result is good enough and the performance is
under control.
3. C Commendable (66 - 75) The result is on average, meet the requirements but still
need some improvement.
4. U Unsatisfactory (55 - 65) The result is not clear and not meet the requirements
5. P Poor (<55) The result is totally not acceptable and the performance
is under the standard.
RATING IDENTIFICATION
1. E Excellent (86 – 100) The result is very satisfied and the performance is above
standard.
2. G Good ( 76 - 85) The result is good enough and the performance is
under control.
3. C Commendable (66 - 75) The result is on average, meet the requirements but still
need some improvement.
4. U Unsatisfactory (55 - 65) The result is not clear and not meet the requirements
5. P Poor (<55) The result is totally not acceptable and the performance
is under the standard.
Analyze the problem’s factor critically and find the solution, but not really
successful on applying in the cinema
4
Rearrange the furniture with suitable ambience and concept for the
4 cinema
Only understand the design concept, but not suitable for the cinema
1
Task 4: Examines the relationship between the cinema and its evironment