Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Evie Garf
Winter 2019
Interpreting 5
What do metaphors ● relate two things that are
not “literally” related
do ?
● applied to clarify or
improve our understanding
Ideas that
don’t
fully exist
are bent
( Wilcox, P.P.)
ICONIC VS. METAPHORICAL
ICONIC METAPHORICAL
● Represents something with ● Represents something that is
its own physical structure not literally “there”
● You can imagine it without ● Ideas don’t have their own
the representation physical structures, so we
● The point is to “copy” steal structures we already
something that already exists know to talk about
● Sign example TREE ● Also uses iconicity, but has
another layer
( Wilcox, P.P.)
Authorship in Interpreting
author
This leads us to understanding that
animator different people can be responsible for
different parts of making the meaning:
(principle) “co-construction”
Llewellyn-Jones, P, & Lee, R.G. (2014). Redefining the role of the community interpreter: The concept of role-space.
Lincoln, UK: SLI Press.
Metzger, M. (1999). Sign language interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality (p. 179). Washington, DC:
Gallaudet University Press.
Tannen, D. (1986). That’s not what I meant!: How conversational style makes or breaks relationships. New York:
HarperCollins Publishers.
Wilcox, P.P. (2005). What do you think? metaphor in thought and communication domains in american sign
language. Sign Language Studies, 5(3), 267-291.
Wilcox, S. & Shaffer, B. (2005). Towards a cognitive model of interpreting. Topics in signed language Interpreting:
Theory and practice, 63, pp. 27–50. T. Janzen (Ed.). New Mexico: Benjamins Translation Library.
“Real Languages” Represent Abstraction?
if we want to prize literal language, it's because that seems like it's the most
basic and clear form of symbolization; and yet, an iconic sign is much closer to
being actually "literal" than using an arbitrary, abstracted spoken word.
What does it mean to call something abstract, since most everything we call
literal language is an abstractified, arbitrary symbol?
So if we want to prize literal language, it's because that seems like it's the most basic and clear form of symbolization; and yet, an iconic
sign is much closer to being actually "literal" than using an arbitrary, abstracted spoken word. challenging the definitions and concepts of
what it means to call something abstract, since most everything we call literal language is an abstractified, arbitrary symbol.
“...perspectives on sign language reveal a
complicated and contradictory history...there are
clear patterns: sign language is often glorified as
a more perfect and exact langauge than speech;
yet it is more often seen as a primitive,
proto-language incapable of conveying abstract
thought. Either case is inaccurate…”
Bauman, 129
Interpreting Metaphors