Office of Lokpal,
Near Oudh Corridor, Ground Floor,
Hotel The Ashok, Chanakyapuri,
New Delhi-110021
Re:- I seek your cognizance for Implementation of Order 24/04/2019 of {RSHRC}
Name of apex decision
maker’s of our PSU non-life
insurance <e-mail>
1. Mr. A V Girija Kumar ,CMD,
<cmd@orientalinsurance.co.in>
2. Ms.Tajinder Mukherjee ; CMD,
<cmd@nic.co.in>,
3. Mr. Atul Sahai ;CMD ,
<cmd.sectt@newindia.co.in>
4. Mr.Girish Radhakrishnan ;
<cmd@uiic.co.in>,
5. Mrs. Alice G Vaidyan;
<cmd@gicofindia.com>
6. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Secretary;
rajeevkumar@nic.in
7. (GIPSA),
harish.gipsa@gmail.com
The events as witnessed by the applicant during last 31 years:-
1 24/02/1988
Applicant gets
six increments
more than
assistant
2 31.10.1991
OICL
3.## January 2003
4 29.09.2003
5 7.12.2005
29/06/2019
Corporation/association ; Address
{with abbreviation}
regulator as per the
General Insurance Act
The Oriental Insurance Company Oriental House, A-25/27 , Asaf
Ltd {OICL} Ali Road,New Delhi - 110 002.
National Insurance Company 3, Middleton Street
Limited {NICL} Kolkata -700 071.
The New India Assurance 87,
Company M.G Road, Fort,
Ltd; **{NIACL} Mumbai-400 001.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd 24, Whites Road,
{UIICL} Chennai - 600 014.
General Insurance Corporation Of Suraksha, 170, Jamshedji Tata
India {GICRe} Road, Churchgate, Mumbai –
400 020
Department of Financial Services; 3rd floor JeevanDeep Building,
{DFS}, Ministry of Finance, Sansad Marg,
New Delhi-- 110001
General Insurers Public Sector Ground Floor,
Association {an association of 5, Jeevan Tara Building, Sansad
above no.1,2,3,4 and 5} Marg, NEW DELHI-110001.
Applicant is appointed as Hindi Translator in a PSU Insurance
company; GIC is the holding corporation; NIACL, OICL,
UIICL, NICL are its subsidiaries. the minimum qualification
required is that of second class graduate, a class-1 officer’s
minimum qualification was graduate in LIC/GIC
directions that If a Hindi Translator seeks transfer as Asstt. he
should be asked to forego additional increments..
An employee of NIACL ( salary roll no.26019 **) demands
bribe in consideration of claim cheque payment from the
insured near Jaipur (Rajasthan); the anti corruption agency
catches him red-handed, it is recorded that his trouser’s pocket
,his hands became red { with gratification}.
Applicant is discriminated in promotion while junior persons
,e.g. salary roll no.24449 promoted in the NIACL {New India
Assurance Co. Ltd}, where the slogan is “follow the leader”
Kamlesh Vasisht, the then Chief Regional Manager {CRM}of
NIACL RO Jaipur communicates to law enforcement
 authority her intent to remove employee of S R No.26019 **
she records dissent to explanation of alleged employee of
doubtful integrity misconduct of bribe taking is established.
6 30.07.2007 Competent court of law grants stay orders upon transfer orders
issued to Applicant dated 5/6/2007 . A Hindi Translator is
addressed as assistant for the sake of transfer. S. B.
Civil writ petition no. 4575/2007 for promotion of Applicant.
7 30.08.2007 NIACL RTI reply: A Non Matriculate employee cannot be
promoted to the post of Hindi Translator. {however, can be
promoted as an assistant }
8 (a) 24.09.2007 NIACL replies that the balance of leave in Applicant’s account
cannot be supplied as leave for 21/06/2007 to 31/7/2007 is
pending in Jaipur
8 (b) 26.3.2008 Sri Harichand,on behalf of NIACL is
{misogynist pleased to write:-“It is surprising fact

deposition that the wife of Mr. Soni is not

following the Hindu Family Traditions
against wife
as she is comfortable away from her
of Applicant}
sick husband..” {Salary No. 20676 is
soon to be rewarded as Dy Gen Manager}
9 (a) April 2008 Suspension order issued by name of Applicant ,1975 rules;
altering his designation to assistant, no grave charge except so
called violation of discipline of leaving headquarter{February
2008}. 29/4/2008 CVC Office Memorandum : Apex
Anti corruption body’s cognizance on the complaint against
isolation forced against the Applicant, CVC directs NIACL to
ensure no harassment to the Applicant.
9-b 14/11/2008 LIC to Applicant:- Our disciplinary process*,being based upon
Principles of natural justice, the enquiry/investigation officer
without prior intimation to charge sheeted employee (CSE)
cannot include deposition of any fresh witness than that of pre-
declared. On 25/09/08 etc. above ethics ignored by NIACL
9-c 10/12 Central Information Commission records defence of NIACL

/2008 respondents F. No. CIC/ AT / A/2008 /00535 :- “Appellant’s

purpose is only to cause harassment and loss to the public
authority. He cannot be allowed to carry on his activities.”
10 February 09 Rules of discipline are altered from retrospective effect.

11/02/09 Bribe taking is reported at Jaipur NIACL, CBI entraps one B.K.
 Gupta; however, no one put to suspension. RTI reply
addressed on behalf of NIACL:-“applicant has expressed his
opinion about state of corruption in its confirmation asked
information about third party, hence denied”. The ethics is
that even an exempted body, e.g. CBI cannot deny
information of corruption of employees
11 2008-09 In the garb of domestic enquiry, Investigation officer NIACL
directs “written brief” from one Harichand, it is deposed in the
said brief that Applicant left headquarters to get stay orders.
12 12.02.2009 LIC informs: there is no provision of such”brief” from a
witness. (during domestic enquiry)
13 8.06.2009 LIC informs : The disciplinary authority is required to submit
complete enquiry/investigation report before taking a decision
in the matter of charged employee. Applicant represents above
to NIACL; no reply.
14 14.05.2009 RTI to CVC reveals applicant- that his complaint was sent for
necessary action to CVO, NIACL on 29/4/2008
15 27.06.2009 It (RTI writings of applicant) is a crude attempt to confuse the
different authorities & an attempt to escape from the due
process of law,observes one A R Sekar, GM, NIACL
16 30.09.2009 No provision of taking cognizance on the basis of joint
representation of insurance employees. LIC RTI reply. There
is no provision of delivery of communication to the delinquent
5.10.2009
employee at his home by the messenger. RTI reply of NICL
17 19.05.2010 Applicant’s RTI to apex court that egregious corruption has eroded
public confidence, forwarded by the Add. Registrar to NIACL

18 30.05.2011 Dept. of Official Language,Ministry of Home takes cognizance

of Applicant’s complaint 10.5.2011 about protection to corrupt
officials NIACL, forwards to DFS.
19 June 2011 NIACL chairman’s order sets aside the disciplinary penalties of
11/2009 ; yet ignores the principles of natural justice inter alia
the directions of CVC , ignores a chargesheet cannot be
communicated by messengers; ignores that Applicant cannot be
punished on the basis of such rules that were never ever alleged
20 10.08.2011 Applicant’s RTI 13/6/11 forwarded by the Prime Minister’s
Office {PMO} : Delhi NIACL negative reply : “Information
sought by the applicant is nearly 23 years old…”
21 15.09.2011 “Only when the competent authority is not available in the R.O.
matter is referred to HO.” DGM, RTI OICL informs
22 12.10.2011 Petitioner-applicant is otherwise employee of respondent
insurance company, Rajasthan High Court interim order in S.
B. (c) Writ Petition No. 14838/10
23-a 9.01.2012 {12- DFS letter to Chairman NIACL ignored on Applicant’s

2011 to 1-2012} complaint of denial in promotion :-“denial of fundamental

rights”... doubtful integrity employee 26019 participates .
23-b 1/10/2012## Doubtful integrity employee no.26019 gets favourable order of disclosure
of Information from Central Information Commission in respect of marks
obtained by 3 successful candidates in written examination for promotion.
Appeal No. CIC/SD/A/2012/000536
NIACL suppresses that he is one of the “doubtful integrity”
24
RBI Chief Vigilance Officer forwards applicant’s concerns , entitled:-
26.12.2014
GIPSA company’s tactics of Writ Petition to protect the corrupt abuse of…
25
6/01/2017 Case No. CIC/MP/2016/000371 Date of decision 30 January 2017
CIC record the NIACL Jaipur respondent’s oral submission:-{argument for
denial of information} …they further stated that the appellant was a
terminated employee of NIACL and had filed 100 RTI applications.

26 December
2018
NIACL eventually
promotes a fully A. R. Sekar, apex leader of NIACL
disciplined /GIPSA as on 20.7.2012 is actually seen in the company of a mainstream
employee,26019; employee of doubtful integrity S R No. 26019 at Jaipur Regional Office.
turning blind eye to
the moral and November 19,2018 General Insurers Public Sector Association {GIPSA}an
ethical standards unregistered apex body frames scheme of immunity for decision makers
of PSU non-life insurance Co.s euphemistically called : “legal and financial
support to serving/retired employees/officers ..against legal cases arising
out of bona fide execution of Company’s work”.The scheme benefits the
alleged psychopaths and their promoting managers who somehow get
rewarded in the workplace(s) of our PSU Insurance.

27 10.04.2019 Applicant’s petition to portal addressed to the President of India,

revealing the events with the prayer:- I pray your cognizance to stop
the legalization of disciplined corruption and promotions of the
disciplined misogynist’s in our public sector Insurance being the
appointing authority to apex decision makers in our PSU insurance
{GIPSA} companies.

RSHRC takes cognizance of the above and pronounces order, observing that
24.04.2019 psychopaths too get promoted in our PSU Insurance while the senior
officer’s remain denied of the same:- {Please see annexure P-1}

Situation:- The events remain a stain on our moral conscience, I only received an e-mail of
congratulations from chief vigilance officer{CVO} of PSU Insurance when my son got all india rank of
133rd in the prestigious IIT, ; other than that there is no acknowledgment of CVO to take action in the
matter of dis-honesty,manipulations or corruption, the annexure P-4 exhibits how the CVO reacted to
the directions of CVC pertaining to my isolation and not to cause my harassment.

Regards, ShriGopal Soni C-231,Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004

{91-9414982395} <revribhav@gmail.com> Annexure(s):-P-1 to P-4
P-1 text of the order of RHRC P-3 extract of applicant’s appointment letter
P-2 Loss of trust in insurance sector of india P-4 NIACL abuse of vigilance misguiding CVC;
manipulative statement of it’s present CMD

Rajasthan state Human Rights Commission P-1

Order

Complaint No. 2019/17/1668 Date 24.04.2019

Single Bench

Before:- Hon’ble Member Justice Sh. Mahesh Chand Sharma

This complaint is communicated by Shri Gopal Soni to this commission. In which the
petitioner files complaint against discrepencies in the promotions in the public sector
insurance company and states that psychopaths too get promoted in the said entities
whereas the senior officer’s remain denied .

We carefully perused the facts pointed out by the petitioner, Prima facie a photo copy of
the complaint is communicated to District Collector, Jaipur we expect that action will be
taken as per the law and the information thereof shall be communicated to the
complainant.

The complaint is being disposed at the Commission. The Complainant be informed with
liberty to take such action as deemed necessary as per the law in the matter.

(Justice Mahesh Chand Sharma)

Member <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

jktLFkku jkT; ekuo vf/kdkj vk;¨x] t;iqj

vknsf‘kdk
ifjokn lU[;k 2019/17/1668 fnukUd 24.04.2019

,dy ihB
le{k %& ekuuh; lnL; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egs‘k pUæ ‘kekZ
;g ifjokn Jhx¨iky l¨uh }kjk bl vk;¨x d¨ Ásf“kr fd;k x;k gS- ftles ÁkFkÊ us ifCyd
lsDVj bU‘;¨jsUl es gqà xMcfM;¨ d¢ f[kykQ ifjokn fn;k gS rFkk dgk gS fd bl lULFkk es
eu¨j¨xh Hkh in¨Uufr ÁkIr dj ysrs gS- tcfd bud¢ ofj“B vf/kdkjh blls ofUpr jg tkrs gS-
geus ifjoknh }kjk ÁLrqr rF;¨ dk /;kuiwod Z voy¨du fd;k- ÁFke –“V~;k ifjokn dh Nk;k Áfr
ftyk dysDVj ]t;iqj d¨ Ásf“kr dj muls vis{kk djrs gS fd os fof/k dh visf{kr vis{kkv¨ d¨
/;ku es j[krs gq, Ádj.k es fof/k vuqlkj vko‘;d dk;Zokgh djsUxs rFkk ifjoknh d¨ bldh lwpuk
nsUxs- …
 Annexure :- loss of trust in insurance of India P-2
(from Shri Gopal Soni @revribhav) :-
Jan 6, 2017

Chennnai:- Neither the insurance company nor it’s agents are trustworthy sources for a
wide spectrum of people a study by industry body ASSOCHAM found.

In a statement issued on Friday, ASSOCHAM said: “Among the first set of people with no
specific knowledge of insurance and finance and those who fall in the age group of 18 to
60 years,72 per cent of those covered in the study said their agent/sales person was the
least trustworthy source in the sales process of an insurance company.”

The second least trustworthy source in the sales process was the insurance company
itself, though the percentage on this count was much less at 29 per cent.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… P-3

Text of appointment letter of the applicant (translated)

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

(A Subsidiary of the General Insurance Corporation of India)
Regional Office: 8-Gulab Bhawan,Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg,New Delhi-1100002
Phone … Telex… Dated:13.06.88

R.O.ii/Personnel/Recruitment/Neelam/87

Shri Gopal Soni

964/44,Badi Nagphani,Ajmer-305001
Dear Sir/Madam,

With reference to your application Dated ---and thereafter interview/Medical test for the post of Hindi
Translator / Assistant (clerk)/Assistant (typist)
****************************

We are pleased to inform you that you are appointed in the grade of 520-30-670-45-850-60-1210-75-
1660 on the post of of Hindi Translator /
Assistant (clerk)/Assistant (typist) to the basic pay of 580 on
***************************

Probation. You shall be entitled to amendment in the aforesaid pay scale and other allowances as per
rules prevalent in General Insurance Industry and you shall be accepting the amendments in the aforesaid
pay scale. The following terms and conditions shall be applicable to you in addition to service conditions
of those applicable to other confirmed employees of your grade:-

1. Your appointment shall be with effect from 24.02.1988 your reporting for duty to Regional
Manager/Deputy Manager/Divisional Manager.
The new India Assurance Co Ltd, Branch Office, Ajmer

****** (words which have been deleted by the Company have been indicated*****)
ANNEXURE from ShriGopal Soni HO/VIG/2009 CF NO.5387/123 P-4

DeepaBajwa, Director Central Vigilance Commission,

Satarkata Bhavan, Block –A ,GPA Complex, INA ,NEW DELHI-110 023'

We acknowledge receipt of Commission's OM reference No, Conf/1463/08

dated 29.4,2008 in connection with the grievances of Mr.Soni, Hindi
Translator. The gist of the complaint preferred by him are as under :

1. Mr.Soni has contended that the Divisional Office has made a false allegation about
not responding to their repeated reminders in connection with his medi-claim.

2. He also made a complaint that in spite of being Senior most employee in the DO, he
was deprived of the functions of Cashier on the pretext that it was refused by him
earlier,

3. He also alleges that unnecessarily he has been issued charge sheet for his sick leave
though sufficient balance was to his credit.

On the basis of various allegations made by Mr.Soni, we had asked our VO to investigate
the matter and report to us. Accordingly the matter was investigaied by our VO. On
perusal of his report, we offer our para-wise comments on the various points raised by
Mr.Soni and the same are as under ;

1. Mr. Soni is our employee, working as Hindi Translator at Ajmer DO. He

submitted Medi claim bills to Div. Office. As some additional information was required
for his claim, letters for compliance were sent to Mr.Soni advising him to comply with
the requirements. However Mr.Soni denied having received any such communication,
delay is therefore caused due to non compliance on the part of Mr.Soni.

2.Divisional Manager, clarified that Mr. Soni is appointed specially as

Hindi Translator and therefore the job of cashier was not allotted to him. Moreover,
as he was already transferred to Gulabpura branch from Ajmer Div, Office, the question
of assigning him with the function of cashier's job at DO does not arise.

3. Mr. Soni, was issued a Memorandum dated 13.2.2008,for his acts of unauthorized
absence, insubordination, leaving head quarter without permission of the superior and
for tampering with the medical certificate. A departmental inquiry was been instituted
to look into the charges framed against him.

In view of the findings of the VO it will be seen that the allegation made by Mr. Soni are
baseless and do not have vigilance angle. Therefore we are closing the case from
vigilance angle. This is for your information please.

Yours faithfully, (GOPA RAY) GM & CVO

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Smt. Gopa Ray has jointed as CVO of our Company on 4th April 2005 on deputation from
LIC of India.Smt Ray Joined LIC of India in 1977. Her motto is pro-activity,strict financial
discipline and preventive approach to vigilance.,which should be encouraged as values
and ethics in work culture are imbibed by each and every employee of this esteemed
institution.( Excerpts From in-house Magazine of NIACL Page 20,VISION )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The statement of CVO ,NIACL informing 3 times to the CVC that applicant is a Hindi
Translator remains misleading even after a decade as another department of NIACL is
emphatic that there is neither any existence of Hindi Translator nor is there any
pending matter of revival of the post. The reply is issued by the chief manager who is
present CMD of NIACL ,Mr. Atul Sahai <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

No. CONF/1463/08-9639

Governement of India

Central Vigilance Commission

Satarkata Bhavan,Block A

GPO Complex,INA

New Delhi 110023 Dated 29/4/2008

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

A copy of the complaint received in the Commission under “Public

Interest disclosure and protection of Informer” is enclosed for necessary
action.

2. It is further stated that as the complaint has been made under the said
resolution,the identity of the complainant has been kept secret.Therefore
this is not to be treated as an anonymous complaint. If the identity of the
complainant gets revealed at any time,the same may be kept secret.

3. Further in case,it gets revealed,it may be ensured that no harassment is

to be caused to the complainant in any manner.

4. The receipt of this OM may be acknowledged.

(DEEPA BAJWA) DIRECTOR