Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Reporter:
Aragon, Norie Angelic G.
Instructor:
Engr. Noroddin V. Melog
June 2019
ABUSE OF CODES
• When codes are not taken seriously within a profession, they amount to a kind of window
dressing that ultimately increases public cynicism about the profession.
• Worse, codes occasionally stifle dissent within the profession and are abused in other
ways.
• Probably the worst abuse of engineering codes is to restrict honest moral effort on the
part of individual engineers to preserve the profession’s public image and protect the
status quo (to maintain existing social structure and values).
• The best way to increase public trust of the engineering professions is by encouraging and
helping engineers to speak freely and responsibly about public safety and well-being.
• On rare occasions, abuses have discouraged moral conduct and caused serious harm to
those seeking to serve the public.
LIMITATION OF CODES
1. Codes are no substitute for individual responsibility in grappling with concrete dilemmas.
- Most codes are restricted to general wording and may contain substantial areas of
vagueness.
2. Uncertainties can arise when different entries in codes come into conflict with each other.
- Codes usually provide little guidance as to which entry should have priority in those
cases.
- For example, tensions arise between stated responsibilities to employers and to the
wider public.
Some people believe that professional ethics is simply the set of conventions embraced
by members of a profession, as expressed in their code.
- This brings us to the issue of ethical relativism.