_______________________ 1. The method prescribed by law for the apprehension and
prosecution of persons accused of any criminal offense, and for their punishment, in case of conviction _______________________ 2. The authority to hear and try a particular offense and impose the punishment for it _______________________ 3. It is one by which the State prosecutes a person for an act or omission punishable by law. _______________________ 4. He shall prosecute, direct and control all criminal actions commenced by a complaint or information. _______________________ 5. A sworn written statement charging a person with an offense, subscribed by the offended party, any peace officer, or other public officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated. _______________________ 6. An accusation in writing charging a person with an offense, subscribed by the prosecutor and filed with the court _______________________ 7. Is one which arises in a case, the resolution of which is a logical antecedent of the issue involved therein and the cognizance of which pertains to another tribunal. _______________________ 8. Is an inquiry or proceeding to determine whether there is sufficient ground to engender a well-founded belief that a crime has been committed and the respondent is probably guilty thereof, and should be held for trial. _______________________ 9. It is an informal and summary investigation conducted by a public prosecutor in criminal cases involving persons arrested and detained without the benefit of a warrant of arrest issued by the court for the purpose of determining whether or not said persons should remain under custody and correspondingly be charged in court. _______________________ 10. Is the proceeding for the determination of the existence of probable cause for the purpose of issuing a warrant of arrest.
II. Essay. Answer briefly and concisely. 5 points each.
1. When is a complaint or information sufficient?
2. Are all crimes initiated by a complaint or information filed by the prosecutor? Why or why not?