Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Criteria for
fo Earthquake
E Resistant
Des
es
Design of Structures
Part 3 Bridges and Retaining Walls
Pa
ICS 91.120.25
© BIS 2014
FOREWORD
This Indian Standard (Part 3) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalized by the
Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council.
Himalayan-Nagalushai region, Indo-Gangetic Plain, Western India, Kutch and Kathiawar regions are geologically
unstable parts of the country, and some devastating earthquakes of the world have occurred there. A major part of
the peninsular India has also been visited by strong earthquakes, but these were relatively few in number occurring
ens The earthquake resistant design of
at much larger time intervals at any site, and had considerably lesser intensity.
structures taking into account seismic data from studies of these Indianan eart
earthquakes has become very essential,
particularly in view of the intense construction activity all over thee co ou
country. It is to serve this purpose that
IS 1893 : 1962 ‘Recommendations for earthquake-resistant design of str tr
structures’ was first published in 1962 and
subsequently revised in 1966, 1975 and 1984.
Further, with a view to keep abreast with the rapid development ent and
d extensive research that has been carried out
res, the
in the field of earthquake-resistant design of various structures, he Committee has decided to cover the provisions
for different types of structures in separate parts. Hence IS 1889 has been split into the five parts. The other parts
1893
in the series are:
Part 1 General provisions and buildings
Part 2 d grou
Liquid retaining tanks - elevated and orteed
orted
ground supported
Part 4 ack lik
Industrial structures including stack ke structures
like ctures
Part 5 Dams and embankments
sionss ffo
This standard (Part 3) contains provisions esign of new bridges and for seismic evaluation of existing
for the design
bridges in the process of their seismicic upg
upgr
upgradation and rretrofitting. Unless otherwise stated, this standard shall be
read necessarily in conjunction with thh IS 1893
1 Part
art 1),
(Part 1)) which
w contains provisions that are general in nature and
res
applicable to all types of structures.
ng
g de
For the purpose of determining ismii forces, the country is classified into four seismic zones as per
ismic
design seismic
Fig. 1 of IS 1893 (Part 1).
This standard has been form or
formulated o ens
to en
ensure that bridges possess at least a minimum strength to withstand
tionn iis not to
earthquakes. The intention o pre
prev
prevent damage to them due to the most severe shaking that they may be
heir llifetime.
subjected to during their e. Actu
Acctua forces that appear on different portions of bridge during earthquakes
Actual
an the
may be greater than th ddesign seis
seism
sm forces specified in this standard. However, ductility arising from material
seismic
iling
lin aand overr str
behaviour, detailing treng arising from the additional reserve strength in them over and above the
strength
design force are rel
eli upon
relied n to account for this difference in actual and design lateral loads.
The reinforced and pre-stressed concrete components shall be designed to be under reinforced so as to cause a
tensile failure. Further, they should be suitably designed to ensure that premature failure due to shear or bond
does not occur. Ductility demand under seismic shaking is usually not a major concern in bridge superstructures.
However, the seismic response of bridges is critically dependent on the ductile characteristics of the sub-structures,
foundations and connections. Provisions for appropriate ductile detailing of reinforced concrete members applicable
to sub-structures and foundations and connections for bridges are given in Annex B.
Some of the major and important modifications made in this revision as compared to IS 1893 : 1984 are as
follows:
a) Seismic zone factors are the same as included in IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2002. Four methods, namely seismic
coefficient method, response spectrum method, time history method and non-linear push over analysis
are given for estimating design forces which recognizes the flexibility of bridges.
Indian Standard
CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN
OF STRUCTURES
PART 3 BRIDGES AND RETAINING WALLS
1
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
existing structure in order to increase its capacity to supports. It may be in various forms such as; stopper,
withstand effect of future earthquakes by addition of cable restrainer, bolts, clamps, etc.
structural elements, dampers or similar devices. The
retrofitting may be required for, (a) seismically 4 GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN
deficient structure; (b) earthquake damaged structure; CRITERIA
and (c) due to modifications made to increase live load
4.1 General Principles
capacity of structure.
4.1.1 All components of the bridge, that is,
3.12 Regular Bridge — A regular bridge has no
superstructure, sub-structure, bearing, foundation and
abrupt or unusual changes in mass, stiffness or
soil are susceptible to damage in the event of strong
geometry along its span and has no large differences
ground shaking. The earthquake resistant design shall
in these parameters between adjacent supports
consider the effect of earthquake motions on each
(abutments excluded). A bridge shall be considered
component of the bridge following the provisions of
regular for the purpose of this standard, if
this standard.
a) it is straight or it describes a sector of an arch
4.1.2 The design sign shall ensure that seismic resistance
which subtends an angle less than 90º at the
of the bridge gee aand its components are adequate to meet
center of the arch;
the specified
ifiedd ddesign requirement so that emergency
b) the adjacent piers do not differ in stiffness by communication
municatio
un after an earthquake shall be maintained
more than 25 percent (Percentage difference for the ddesign basis earthquake.
hee desi
shall be calculated based on the lesser of the
two stiffness); and 4.1.3
.1 Masonry and plain concrete arch bridges with
1.33 M
c) girder bridges, T-beam bridges, truss bridges, spans
pans more than 10 m shall not be built in the seismic
sp
hammer head bridges, bridges having single Zon
Zones IV and V.
or multiple simply supported spans with each ch 4.1.4 Box
Box, pipe and slab culverts need not be designed
span less than 120 m and pier height above ve arthqua forces. Bridges of total length not more
for earthquake
foundation level less than 30 m. n 600 m and individual span not more than 15 m
than
3.13 Seismic Coefficient Method — A seismic seism eed nnot be designed for earthquake forces other than
need
analysis method in which seismic force equal to the iin
nZ o
Zones IV and V.
weight of the structure/component multiplied lied by design 44.
4.1.5 Seismic forces on aqueduct structures and
acceleration coefficient is applied statically
llyy at the
t centrere flyover bridges shall be calculated as for any other
of mass of the structure/component. bridge. The effect of inertia force of flowing water mass
3.14 Seating Width — The distance ce between
bet thee end
en in aqueduct shall be calculated on the basis of
of the girder to the top edge of a sub-structure
b stru to prevent
preven
pre assumptions in 6.5.
the girder from being dislocated ed in
catted i the event
even nt of
o an 4.1.6 Hydrodynamic pressure on walls of water trough
unexpectedly large relative ve displacement
disp entt between
ment bbe in case of aqueduct shall be considered on the basis of
super and sub-structure. provision of IS 1893 (Part 2).
3.15 Seismic Links — Restrainers
Res
Reestr through
throug
hro which part 4.1.7 The liquefaction potential of foundation soil shall
or all of the seismic action
on may bee transmitted.
actio tr
tra
rans Used be investigated where necessary shall be according to
in combination with h bearings
th bbe and
an they are usually 21.
provided with appropriate
approp
pp slack
ackk so as to be activated
only in case whenn the
th design n seismic
gn sei displacements is 4.1.8 When relative movement between two adjacent
exceeded. units of a bridge are designed to occur at a separation/
expansion joint, sufficient clearance shall be provided
3.16 Special and Irregular Types of Bridges — The between them, to permit the relative movement under
bridges with innovative designs and bridges such as design earthquake conditions to freely occur without
suspension bridge, cable stayed bridge, arch bridge, inducing damage. Where the two units may be out of
bascule bridge and irregular bridges such as skew phase, the clearance to be provided may be estimated
bridge of angle 30º and above with span more than as the square root of the sum of squares of the calculated
60 m shall be categorized under these types. displacements of the two units under maximum elastic
3.17 Unseating Prevention System — A structure seismic forces.
installed to prevent a superstructure from unseating due 4.1.9 Special design studies shall be called for the
to an earthquake. It may comprise of an adequate seat following cases:
length, devices to prevent excessive displacement,
jumping and preventing structure from dislodging from a) Consideration of asynchronous ground
2
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
3
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
seismic evaluation should be carried out following the be applicable to sub-structures. Bridges shall be
methods of seismic analysis recommended in this designed such that under severe seismic shaking plastic
standard taking into consideration the reduced stiffness hinges form in the sub-structure, rather than in the deck
and capacity due to cracking and damage. or foundation.
4.2.9 Retrofitting of Existing Bridges NOTE – Specialist literature to be consulted for asynchronous
ground motion.
Seismically deficient bridges should be evaluated using
the provisions of this standard to determine the need 6 ASSUMPTIONS
of retrofitting. The prioritization of bridges for The following assumptions shall be made in the
retrofitting should be based upon seismicity, age, earthquake analysis of bridges:
deterioration and importance of the bridge. The
retrofitting of bridges shall consist of upgrading the a) The seismic forces due to design basis
strength to meet the requirement of this standard. earthquake (DBE) should not be combined
with design wind forces.
5 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY b) The scscour to be considered for design shall
be based on mean design flood. In the absence
5.1 Serviceability Limit State of det t i
detailed data, the scour to be considered
The design of bridge should meet the serviceability for ddesign shall be 0.9 times the maximum
limit state under design basis earthquake (DBE). The des
design scour depth (see Note).
parts of the bridge intended to contribute to energy NOTE — The designer is cautioned that the
dissipation shall undergo minor damage without giving maximum seismic scour case may not always govern
rise to need for reduction of traffic or immediate repair. in design condition.
Specialist literature to be consulted for limit state c) The earthquake accelerations should be
analysis using MCE (involving non-linear analysis and nd applied to full mass in case of submerged
time history method). str
structures and not on buoyant mass.
5.2 Ultimate Limit State d) The seismic force on live load in bridges
should not be considered in longitudinal
The design of bridge should meet non-collapse colla direction. The seismic force on live load
requirement that is, ultimate limit state under er maximum
maxim should be considered in transverse direction
considered earthquake (MCE). While designing essigning as per as explained in the 7.1.
IS 456, DBE may be considered. The bridge ridge shall
sh
s retain
ain
in
e) The seismic force on flowing mass of water
its structural integrity and adequate residualua resistance,
residua stanc
nce,
ce,
in the longitudinal direction in case of
although considerable damage mayy occur oc inn some
som
aqueducts should not be considered, however
portions of the bridge. The structureure should
sh be able
ab to t
seismic force on this water mass be considered
sustain emergency traffic, inspections
ction and repair
pecctio epaiir could
repai c
in transverse direction. The hydrodynamic
be performed easily after the he earthquake.
earthh e..
action of water on the walls of water carrying
The bridge superstructuree however
owe shall
ho
how all in general be trough shall be considered according to the
protected from the formation
on of
ation
io o plastic
ic hinges
tic hhing and from provisions of code on liquid retaining
unseating due to extreme
eme seismic
se
s displacements
displa
di spplac under structures.
MCE. f) The earthquake accelerations on embedded
portion of bridge foundations should be
5.3 Ductile Behaviour
ehav
avio
i reduced as explained in 9.3.
The reinforced and pre-stressed ed concrete components g) The value of static elastic modulus of material,
shall be designed as under-reinforced so as to cause a where required, may be taken for dynamic
tensile failure. Further, they should be suitably designed analysis unless a more definite value is
to ensure that premature failure due to shear or bond available for use in seismic condition.
does not occur. Stresses induced in the superstructure
due to earthquake ground motion are usually quite 7 LOAD COMBINATIONS
nominal. Therefore, ductility demand under seismic When earthquake forces are combined with other
shaking has not been a major concern in the bridge forces such as dead load and live load, the load factor
superstructures during past earthquakes. However, the for plastic design of steel structures and partial safety
seismic response of bridges is critically dependent on factors for limit state design of reinforced concrete
the ductile characteristics of the sub-structures. structures and pre-stressed concrete structures shall be
Provisions for appropriate ductile detailing of considered. Load factors may be used as in IRC/IRS
reinforced concrete members given in Annex B shall codes with the provision that when earthquake load
4
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
5
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
mic
F = horizontal seismicic force
fo o be
to b rees
resisted; The design horizontal seismic coefficient, Ah shall be
determined from following expression of 6.4.2 of
W = weight of mass
ass under
uun consideration
n idera
nside ignoring
IS1893 (Part 1).
reduction due to buoyancyncy or uplift; and
ancy
anc
Ah = designn ho
hori
horizontal seis
seismic
ismi coefficient as Z I Sa
Ah = . .
rmined
ed from 9.4.1
determined .4.1
9.4.1. 2 R g
9.3 For embedded portion off foundation at depths Provided that for any structure with T < 0.1 s, the value
exceeding 30 m below scour level, the seismic force of Ah shall not be taken less than Z/2, whatever be the
due to foundation mass may be computed using design value of I/R.
seismic coefficient equal to 0.5Ah. where
For portion of foundation between the scour level and Z = zone factor;
up to 30 m depth, the seismic force due to that portion
of foundation mass may be computed using seismic I = importance factor (see Table 2);
coefficient obtained by linearly interpolating between R = response reduction factor (see Table 3); and
Ah at scour level and 0.5 Ah at a depth 30 m below Sa
scour level.
g = average acceleration coefficient for rock or
soil sites as given in Fig. 1.
6
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
FIG .1 R ESPONSE SPECTRA FOR ROCK AND SOIL SITES FOR 5 PERCENT DAMPING
9.4.2 Design Vertical Seismic Coefficient, Av Cost of replacement, and time involved in
d) C
reconstruction in case of failure; and
The design vertical seismic coefficient may be adopt
adopted
as in 7.3.2. e) Indirect economic loss due to its partial or full
non-availability.
9.4.3 Design Seismic Coefficient for Differen
Different Soils
and Damping IImportance factors are given in Table 2 for different
types of bridges.
Mathematical expressions of 5.4.2 of IS 18
1
1893 Partt 1)
(Part
can be used to compute Sa/g foror dif
different
ffer soil/rock
oil/rock
/ro 9.4.5 Response Reduction Factor, R
types. Table 3 of IS 1893 (Part1)1) ccan be used
ed fofor The response reduction factor for different components
t.
damping other than 5 percent. is given in Table 3.
9.4.4 Importance Factor, I
9.5 TIME HISTORY METHOD (THM)
res
esi design
esist
Bridges are designed to resist gn basis
basiis earthquake
The dynamic analysis of a bridge by time history
(DBE) level, or otherr higher
high
hi ower
we magnitude of
wer
or lower
method may be carried out using direct step-by-step
forces, depending onn the
tth consequences
c u nce
uen ce of their partial
method of integration of equations of motion. At least
avail
ailab
i
or complete non-availability, duuee to
due t damage or failure
three spectrum compatible time histories shall be used,
ven
from seismic event. ent The levellev
evel of design force is
when site-specific time histories are not available. The
multip
obtained by multiplying Z/2 by factor ‘I’, which
(Z/2)
spectrum used to generate these time histories shall be
represents seismic importance of the structure.
the same as used for the modal analysis. Their duration
Combination of factors considered in assessing the
shall be consistent with their magnitude and source
consequences of failure, and hence choice of factor
characteristics of design basis earthquake. The total
‘I’, include inter alia.
duration of time history shall be about 30s of which
Importance factor depends upon the following: the strong motion part shall be not less than 6s. This
analysis can be carried out using a standard software
a) Extent of disturbance to traffic and possibility
package.
of providing temporary diversion;
b) Availability of alternative routes; 9.6 Non-linear Pushover Analysis (NPA)
c) Cost of repairs and time involved, which It is a static non-linear analysis carried out to determine
depend on the extent of damages, minor or lateral load versus displacement at control point in the
major; structure for the purpose of determining capacity of
7
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
8
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
1111 SUPERSTRUCTURE
11.1 The ssuperstructure shall be designed for the
gnn sseis
design seismic forces as specified in 9 plus other loads
quir
uired
ire in design load combinations.
required
111.
11.2 .2 Under simultaneous action of horizontal and
vve
ver
vertical accelerations, the superstructure shall have a
ffactor of safety of at least 1.5 against overturning under
DBE condition.
11.3 The superstructure shall be secured, when
FIG. 2 D IAGRAM SHOWING HYDRODYNAMIC
RODYNA P RE
RESSURE
ESSURE
SUR necessary to the sub-structure in all zones through
DISTRIBUTION
ON
N bearings possessing adequate vertical holding down
devices and/or unseating prevention system for
this implies selecting a point
nt on
o the vertical
cal axis
ertical
ical a with superstructure. These devices should be used for
origin at top, then other her coefficients
he ciennts are read suspended spans also with the restrained portion of
horizontally from the tablel to generate
nerrate the pressure
erate the superstructure. However, frictional forces in the
curve and determine other
othe coefficients
nts mentioned
ciients
ent m on devices should not be relied upon for preventing
the curve. dislodging and jumping of superstructure.
9
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
10
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
reaction blocks and seismic arrestors shall be designed adequate ductility measures to ensure the required
for, at least twice the seismic force. overall structure ductility.
The linkages, if provided, shall be designed for at least, 17.2 Detailing for Ductility
elastic seismic acceleration coefficient, Ah times the
weight of the lighter of the two adjoining spans or parts The compliance with provisions of Annex B should
of the structure as in the case of suspended spans. be made in general to ensure the availability of
adequate local and overall structure ductility.
If the linkage is at locations where relative
deformations are designed to occur, then sufficient 18 DETAILING FOR CONTROL OF
slack must be allowed in the linkage so that linkages DISPLACEMENTS
start functioning only when the design relative
In addition to ensure overall ductility, structural and non-
displacement at the linkage is exceeded and linkage
structural detailing must ensure satisfactory behaviour
becomes effective, after overcoming the designed slack
of the bridge under design seismic displacement.
in the linkage.
The design value
lu of the displacement dED under seismic
When linkages are provided at columns or piers, the
condition for providing
p clearances in critical
linkage of each span may be connected to the column
componentss shall
shhal be determined as follows:
or pier instead of to the adjacent span.
dED = dE + dG ± dTS
16 SUBMERSIBLE BRIDGES
where
ere
For submerged superstructure of submersible bridges,
the hydrodynamic pressure shall be determined by the dE = design seismic displacement determined from
following equation: linear analysis considering R = 1;
dG = displacement due to permanent and quasi-
p = 8.75 Ah Hy pe
permanent action measured in long term such
where as shrinkage, creep and post-tensioning;
dTSS = displacement due to thermal movements =
p = hydrodynamic pressure, in kPa;
0.4 dT; and
Ah = design horizontal seismic coefficient
nt as gi
ggiven
dT = design displacement due to thermal
in 9.4.1;
movement.
H = height of water surface from om the
he level of
deepest scour (see 4.5.2) inn m; and
an 19 SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF BRIDGES
y = depth of the section below
w the water surface,
th w urface
rfac 19.1 General Provision
in m.
The decision to retrofit shall be based on the overall
The total horizontal shear and moment
mome
mom om perer meter
mete
m width consideration of seismicity, vulnerability and
about the centre of gravity of the
tth base att any depth y, importance of the bridge.
due to hydrodynamic pressureessu aree given
preess
pres g
give by the
following relations: The need to retrofit shall be determined on the basis of
one of the standard procedures such as capacity-
Vy = 2
2/3 py demand ratio method, non-linear pushover analysis and
My = 4/15 pyy2 time history method.
where The objective of retrofitting should be to meet at least
Vy = hydrodynamic shear,
r in kPa; and the requirement of present seismic code considering
residual life of the structure.
My = hydrodynamic moment, in kPa-m.
17 SPECIAL DUCTILITY REQUIREMENTS 19.2 Retrofit Techniques
FOR BRIDGES 19.2.1 On the basis of deficiency observed after
seismic evaluation, suitable retrofit techniques should
17.1 General Requirement
be selected. Some retrofit techniques for various
The bridge shall be designed so that its behaviour under components are given below.
design seismic action is ductile. The capacity design
19.2.2 Superstructure
provisions shall be applicable to regular, special and
irregular types of bridges in Zones III, IV and V. Horizontal or vertical motion restrainers, inter linking
of spans, pre-stressing, using dampers.
The intended plastic hinges shall be provided with
11
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
12
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
13
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
component of the total pressure shall be applied at an Av = vertical seismic coefficient which is
elevation h/3 above the base of the wall. The point of 2 Ah .
application of the dynamic decrement shall be assumed 3
to be at an elevation 0.5 h above the base of the wall. c) Buoyant unit weight shall be adopted.
22.1.3 Active Pressure Due to Uniform Surcharge d) From the value of earth pressure found out as
above, subtract the value of static earth
The active pressure against the wall due to a uniform pressure determined by putting Ah = Av = λ = 0.
surcharge of intensity q, kN per unit area of the inclined The remainder shall be dynamic increment.
earthfill surface shall be:
23.3 Hydrodynamic pressure on account of water
qh cos α contained in earth fill shall not be considered separately
(P )
Aq dyn =
cos (α − i )
Ca as the effect of acceleration of water has been
considered indirectly.
22.1.3.1 Point of application
24 PARTIALLY SUBMERGED BACKFILL
The dynamic increment in active pressure due to
uniform surcharge shall be applied at an elevation of atio of
24.1 The ratio o the lateral dynamic increment in
0.66 h above the base of the wall, while the static sure
ure du
active pressure due to backfill to the vertical pressures
component shall be applied at mid-height of the wall. us depths
at various dept
pth along the height of wall may be taken
own
wn in Fig. 6a.
as shown
22.1.4 Passive Pressure Due to Uniform Surcharge
Thee pressure
ppres
ress distribution of dynamic increment in
The passive pressure against the wall due to a uniform ive ppressures due to backfill may be obtained by
active
surcharge of intensity q per unit area of the inclined m
multip
multiplying the vertical effective pressures by the
earthfill shall be: coef
coefficients in Fig. 6a at corresponding depths.
qh cos α
(P )
NOTE — Ca is computed as in 22.1.1 for dry, moist and
= Cp
cos (α − i ) urated bbackfills and Ca′ is computed as in 22.1.1 and 23.2
Pq dyn saturated
for sub-merged
or su
ub backfills.
22.1.4.1 Point of application
Ka = value of Ca when Ah = Av = λ = 0
The dynamic decrement in passive pressure due to
sure du K a′ = value of Ca′ when Ah = Av = λ = 0
uniform surcharge shall be applied at an ele elevation
of 0.66 h above the base of the wall while le tthe static
ic h′ = height of submergence above the base of the wall
component shall be applied at an elevation
tion 0.5 h above
vatio ove Lateral dynamic increment due to surcharge
the base. multiplying with q is shown in Fig. 6b.
ION
O ON LAT
23 EFFECT OF SATURATION LA
ATER
LATERAL 24.2 Concrete or masonry inertia forces due to
EARTH PRESSURE horizontal and vertical earthquake accelerations are the
products of the weight of wall and the horizontal and
23.1 For saturated earthfill,ill,, th
the saturated
ated uunit weight vertical seismic coefficients respectively.
edd aas iin the formul
of the soil shall be adopted or l described
formulae
25 ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE DUE TO c-φ
in 22.1.
SOIL
23.2 For submerged d earthfill,
ed ea
eart
e the
hee dynamic
dyna increment (or 25.1 Active earth pressure due to c-φ soil as backfill.
decrement) in activeve and
cttive a passive sive earth
ear pressure during Fig. 7 shows a section of retaining wall retaining c-ϕ
hall be found from
earthquakes shall fro expressions given in soil as backfill which also carries a uniform surcharge
ow modifications:
22.1.1 and 22.1.2 with the following of intensity q.
a) The value of δ shall be taken as ½ the value 25.2 AFCD is cracked zone in c-φ soil, CD being ‘Hc’
of δ for dry/moist backfill. given by following expression:
b) The value of λ shall be taken as follows:
2c
Hc = Nö = nH
⎡ γ Ah ⎤ γ
λ = tan −1 ⎢ s × ⎥ where
γ
⎣ s − 10 1 ± Av⎦
where Nϕ = tan2 (45º + φ/2);
γs = saturated unit weight of soil, in kN/m3; n = Non-dimensional factor describing the depth
Ah = horizontal seismic coefficient (see of tension crack; and
10.4.1); and γ = Dry or moist unit weight of soil.
14
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
LATERAL
AL DYN
YNAMIC
N INCREMENT
C M
CREME DUE TO BACKFILL WITH HEIGHT OF W ALL
F IG. 6A DISTRIBUTION OF THE R ATIO =
VER
ERTICAL E FFECTIVE PRESSURE
15
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
16
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
9A (N
N aqm )sts ve
versus f for n = 0, i = 0°
17
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
18
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
19
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
12
2B (Naym
ym ) st VE
VERSUS
ER φ FOR n = 0.2, i = 10°
20
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
n = 0, i = 0º, l1 = l2
20º 1.153 1.117 1.098 1.327 1.247 1.208 1.52 1.393 1.333
30º 1.187 1.133 1.108 1.392 1.278 1.228 1.62 1.438 1.36
40º 1.241 1.156 1.123 1.51 1.327 1.258 1.807 1.513 1.407
n = 0, i = 10º, l1 = l2
40º 1.254 1.168 1.137 1.542 1.356 1.292 1.869 1.566 1.466
n = 0.4, i = 00º,, l1
f Ah = 0.05 Ah = 0.10
0.1 A h = 0.15
20º 1.206 1.117 1.073 1.44 1.247 1.154 1.709 1.393 1.246
n = 0.4, 10º,
4, i = 10
1 l1
a = -20º a = 0º =
a =20º 0º
a = -20º a = 0º a = 20º a = -20º a = 0º a =20º
40º 1.394 1.1688 1.1144 1.868 1.357 1.242 2.424 1.566 1.384
n = 0.4, i = 0º, l2
f Ah = 0.05
0 Ah =0.10 A h = 0.15
20º 1.169
169 1.117 1.09 1.356 1.247 1.192 1.57 1.393 1.307
30º 1.205 1.133 1.102 1.433 1.279 1.214 1.684 1.438 1.337
40º 1.27 1.156 1.116 1.575 1.327 1.243 1.917 1.513 1.382
n = 0.4, i = 10º, l2
20º 1.211 1.153 1.127 1.478 1.345 1.292 1.854 1.618 1.536
30º 1.226 1.151 1.122 1.488 1.323 1.262 1.79 1.52 1.425
40º 1.287 1.168 1.13 1.619 1.357 1.277 1.997 1.566 1.442
21
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
ANNEX A
(Clause 2)
LIST OF REFERRED INDIAN STANDARDS
ANNEX B
(Foreword, Clauses 4.2.7, 5.3 and
d 117.2)
nd
DUCTILE DETAILING
LING
IN
22
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
b) MULTI-COLUMN
b TI-CO
-C
CO OR FRAME TYPE SUBSTRUCTURES
FIG . 13 POT
OTENTIAL L OCATION
OTEN OF PLASTIC HINGES IN SUBSTRUCTURES
shouldd be 30 times the bar diameter and each Joint portion of hoop ties for both circular and
end of the bar anchored with 135º hooks with rectangular hoops should be staggered.
a 10 diameter extension into the confined core.
Splicing of the spiral reinforcement in the B-5 DESIGN OF PLASTIC HINGE REGIONS
plastic hinge region should be avoided.
B-5.1 Seismic Design Force for Sub-structure
In rectangular columns, rectangular hoops may be used.
Provisions given for the ductile detailing of RC
A rectangular hoop is a closed stirrup, having a 135º
members subjected to seismic forces shall be adopted
hook with a 10 diameter extension at each end that is
for supporting components of the bridge. Further, the
embedded in the confined core Fig. 14 (c). When hoop
design shear force at the critical section (s) of sub-
ties are joined in any place other than a corner the hoop
structures shall be the lower of the following:
ties shall overlap each other by a length 40 times the
bar diameter of the reinforcing bar which makes the a) Maximum elastic shear force at the critical
hoop ties with hooks as specified above. section of the bridge component divided by
23
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
F IG. 114
4 T RANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT IN COLUMN
the response
pon
onse
n reduction
c tion factor for the
ction structure, the critical section is at the bottom
components
ents as per Table
onnent Table.
e of the column or pier as shown in Figs. 13(a).
b) Maximum
mum shear force
rce that develops when the
orce And, in multi-column frame-type sub-
sub-structure has maximum moment that it structures or multi-pier sub-structures, the
can sustain (that is the over strength plastic critical sections are at the bottom and/or top
moment capacity as per B-5.2) in single of the columns/piers as shown in Figs. 13 (b).
column or single-pier type sub-structure, or
B-5.2 Over Strength Plastic Moment Capacity
maximum shear force that is developed when
plastic moment hinges are formed in the sub- The over strength plastic moment capacity at the
structure so as to form a collapse mechanism reinforced concrete section shall be taken as 1.3 times
in multiple column frame type or multiple- the ultimate moment capacity based on the usual partial
pier type sub-structures, in which the plastic safety factors recommended by relevant design codes
moment capacity shall be the over strength for materials and loads, and on the actual dimensions
plastic moment capacity as per B-5.2. of members and the actual reinforcement detailing
c) In a single-column type or pier type sub- adopted.
24
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
calculated from point of contra-flexure in the forces in the joining members. Forces in the joint
case of a column in single curvature. should be determined by considering a free body of
Outside the hinge regions, the spacing of hoops shall the joint with the forces on the joint member boundaries
not exceed half the least lateral dimension of the properly represented.
column or 300 mm. The joint shear strength should be entirely provided
by transverse reinforcement. Where the joint is not
B-7 DESIGN OF JOINTS
confined adequately (that is where minimum pier and
Beam-column joints should be designed properly to pile cap width is less than three column diameters) the
resist the forces caused by axial load, bending and shear special confinement requirement should be satisfied.
ANNEX C
(Clause 22.1.1.1)
GRAPHICAL DETERMINATION OF DYNAMIC ACTIVE
TIV EARTH PRESSURE
26
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
ANNEX D
(Clause 22.1.2.1)
GRAPHICAL DETERMINATION OF DYNAMIC PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE
D-1 MODIFIED CULMANN’S GRAPHICAL (90 – α – δ – ψ) below BS. The other steps for
CONSTRUCTION construction remain unaltered (see Fig. 16).
For determining the passive earth pressure draw BS Effect of uniformly distributed load and line load on
at (φ – ψ) below horizontal. Next draw BL at the back fill surface may be handled in the similar way
as for the static case.
27
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
ANNEX E
(Foreword)
COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee, CED 39
Chairman
DR A. S. ARYA (up to 6 September 2010)
Building Materials and Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi
DR D. K. PAUL (after 6 September 2010)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee
Organization Representative(s)
Association of Consulting Engineers, Bangalore SHRI UMESHSH B. RAO
SHRII B.V. RAVINDRA NATH (Alternate)
Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, Mumbai DR P.C. BA
ASU
SHRI ROSHAN A. D. (Alternate)
Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited, New Delhi SHRI
RI RA
AVI KUMAR
DR C. KAMESHWARA RAO (Alternate)
Building Materials & Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi SH
HRI J. K. PRASAD
SHRI P ANKAJ GUPTA (Alternate)
Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee SHRI N AVJEEN S AXENA
SHRI AJAY CHAURASIA (Alternate)
Central Public Works Department, New Delhi SHRI B HAGWAN SINGH
SHRI S. P. LOKHANDE (Alternate)
Central Soils and Materials Research Station, New Delhi
elhi SH
HRI N. P. H ONKANDAVAR
28
IS 1893 (Part 3) : 2014
Organization Representative(s)
Indian Meterological Department, New Delhi SHRI S URYA BALI JAISWAR
SHRI RAJESH PRAKASH (Alternate)
Indian Road Congress, New Delhi SECRETARY G ENERAL
DIRECTOR (Alternate)
Indian Society of Earthquake Technology, Roorkee PROF D. K. PAUL
PROF H. R. WASON (Alternate)
Maharashtra Engineering Research Institute, Nasik SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (EARTH D AM)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (EARTH DAM) (Alternate)
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi SHRI R. K. PANDEY
SHRI VIRENDRA KUMAR (Alternate)
National Council for Cement and Building, Ballabgarh SHRI V. V. ARORA
National Geophysical Research Institute (CSIR), Hyderabad DR M. RAVI K UMAR
DR N. PURANCHADRA RAO (Alternate)
National Highway Authority of India, New Delhi SHRI SURESH
SH KUMAR P URI
Member Secretary
SHRI S. CHATURVEDI
Scientist ‘E’ (Civil Engg), BIS
29
(Continued from second cover)
b) The concept of ductility and over-strength is brought in the draft explicitly, by introducing the response
reduction factors.
c) Different response reduction factors have been proposed for the different components of the bridge,
depending on the redundancy, expected ductility and over-strength in them.
d) The design force level for bridge has been raised from the existing level and brought in line with IS 1893
(Part 1) : 2002.
e) The concept of capacity design is introduced in the design of connections, sub-structures and foundations.
f) The soil-foundation factor is dropped. The effect of soil on response is represented in the response
spectrum.
g) Provision for dislodging of girders in the bearings is introduced.
h) Use of vertical hold-down devices, stoppers, restrainers and horizontal linkage elements to account for
the large displacements generated during seismic shaking is re recommended for preventing falling of
spans.
j) A minimum width of seating of superstructure over sub-structures
uctu to avoid dislodging of spans from
atop the sub-structure is required for all bridges.
k) The method of computing earth pressures for c–φ soill is iincl
included in the section on retaining walls.
In the formulation of this standard, due weightage has been given
en to
ven t international
in coordination among the standards
and practices prevailing in different countries in addition to relati
relating
i it to the practices in the field in this country.
The units used with the items covered by the symbols shall consistent throughout this standard, unless specifically
alll be co
noted otherwise.
The composition of the Committee responsible for the fformulation
tion oof this standard is given in Annex E.
For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement
ular req of this standard is complied with the final value,
nt of
observed or calculated, expressing the result off a tes
test or analysis
y shall
alysi
alysis h be rounded off in accordance with IS 2 : 1960
‘Rules for rounding off numerical values (revised)’.
revised Thee nu number
umb of significant places retained in the rounded off
num
value should be the same as that of the specifie
specified value
sp ue in this standard.
n th
Bureau of Indian Standards
BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote
harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods
and attending to connected matters in the country.
Copyright
BIS has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these publications may be reproduced in any form
without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course of
implementing the standard, of necessary details, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations.
Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director (Publications), BIS.
Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of com comments. Standards are also reviewed
periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such ch rreview indicates that no changes are
en up
needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken p ffor revision. Users of Indian Standards
ments oor edition by referring to the latest issue of
men
should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments
‘BIS Catalogue’ and ‘Standards : Monthly Additions’.
ssued
d Since Publi
Amendments Issued Publication
BUREAU
B AU O
OF
F IN
INDIAN STANDARDS
Headquarters:
Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Sha
Shah Zafar Marg,
Marg
arg New Delhi 110002
Telephones : 2323 0131, 2323
23223 3375, 232
323 99402
2323 Website: www.bis.org.in