25-02-2004

KOCA4PWB.XLS

Sample Design Calculations of

Foundation for Vertical Vessel
.

. . . . . . . CONTRACTOR AREA
. . . . . . . FACILITY UPGRADE & RELOCATION OF U/G PROCESS PIPING
. . . . . . . Petrofac FOR GC 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 21, 23, BS 140 & BS 150 (GROUP A)
A For Review RD FS VK MA 14/07/05 Sample Design Calculations of
REV. AMENDMENTS PRPD CKD APPD APPD DATE PREPARED . CHECKED . APPROVED . Foundation for Vertical Vessel
KOC APPROVALS APPROVED . DATE . SCALE NA CONTRACTOR DOC. No. REV. K.O.C. DOC. No. REV.

DEPARTMENT SIGNATURE DESIGNATION DATE PROJECT - FACILITY UPGRADE & RELOCATION OF U/G PROCESS PIPING
JI-180-000-ECV-CAL-XXX A XXX-XX-XXX X
FOR GC 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 21, 23, BS 140 & BS 150 (GROUP A)

PROJECT No. - EF/1500 CONTRACT No. - 26155

 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES 0011-9500-WGEL-G000-ISGP-G00000-CX-
Doc. No 7704-00001
CONTRACT

PROJECT TITLE Job No. WG00XX

Document Title Rev No.: 01

1.0 General
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Assumptions/Design Considerations
1.3 Methodology
1.4 References
1.5 Load conditions
1.5.1 Load combinations for calculation of soil pressure and stability check
1.5.2 Factored load combinations for R.C.C design

2.0 Input data for foundation supporting vertical vessel

2.1 Foundation Geometric data
2.2 Anchor bolt data
2.3 Vessel data
2.4 Load data
2.5 Material data
2.6 R.C.C design data
2.7 Soil data

3.0 Stability and bearing capacity check

3.1 Calculation for stability of foundation under various load conditions
3.2 Calculation of soil pressure under various load conditions

4.0 RCC design of the foundation and the pedestal

4.1 Factored load and base pressure calculation for R.C.C design
4.2 Design of foundation
4.3 Design of Pedestal

5.0 Summary of result

Attachments

1) Equipment vendor Drawing & Load input

2) Foundation G.A Drawing & Reinforcement details

Page 2 of 23
 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT 0011-9500-WGEL-
SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No G000-ISGP-G00000-
CX-7704-00001

PROJECT TITLE Job No.

WG00XX
Rev
Document Title 01
No.:

1.0 GENERAL

1.1 Introduction

The scope of this document includes Analysis and Design of foundation for vertical vessels.

The design calulations are carried out in different parts

1. Check stability of foundation under various load combinations.
2. Calculation of soil pressure under various load combinations.
3. Factored load and base pressure calculation for R.C.C design.
4. R.C.C design of the foundation and the pedestal.

1.2 Assumptions/Design considerations

This spreadsheet takes care of both wind as well as seismic shear and moments.
1.3 Methodology

This sheet is used for the analysis and design of foundation for vertical vessels. This spread sheet contains input data
sheet, Stability check and Bearing capacity calculation sheet, Strength design sheet and summary sheet. In the Input
data sheet following input shall be furnished.

Foundation Sketch
Foundation geometric data
Bolt data
Vessel data
Load data
Material data
R.C.C design data
soil data

Bearing capacity and Stability Check: Based on the input data, stability of the foundation, soil pressure under
various load combinations have been checked.

RCC design of foundation and Pedestal: Maximum base pressure in soil under factored load combinations for
R.C.C design are calculated. Based on the maximum developed base pressure, bending moment at the edge
of the pedestal, shear force at the edge of the pedestal and shear force at a distance "d" from the pedestal are
calculated. Bottom reinforcement for footing mat is calculated for the design moment. If the required
reinforcement is lesser than that of minimum then, minimum reinforcement of 0.09% (as per Clause 7.12.2.1
ACI-318-11) is provided. If foundation is in tension (i.e if there is a loss of contact in between soil and footing
base) then top reinforcement is calculated. Also Minimum reinforcement of 0.09% (i.e half of 0.18%) is
provided on top also. Foundation is checked for one way shear and punching (two-way action) shear.
Required Reinforcement in pedestal is calculated and axial capacity check as per clause 10.3.6.2 ACI-318-11 is
performed.

All the design results are tabulated in summary sheet.

1.4 References

1 0011-9500-WGEL-N004-ISGP-G00000-CX-7704-0000 Civil/Structural design basis

2 ACI-318-11 Building code requirement for structural concrete
3 Hand book of concrete engineering by Mark Fintel
1.5 Load conditions

Following load conditions are considered for the analysis and design
(i)Empty condition
(ii)Erection condition
(iii)Operating condition
(iv)Hydrotest condition

1.5.1 Load combinations for calculation of soil pressure and Stability: Notations For Loads
Ref Appendix A of 0011-9500-WGEL-N004-ISGP-G00000-CX-7704-00001 DL - Dead Load
WL- Wind Load
Operating (wit 1.0*DL (Operating) EL- Earthquake Load

Empty Conditi 0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.0*WL

0.9*DL(Empty) + 0.7*EL

Erection Condi1.0*DL(Erection) + 0.8*WL

Operating Cond
1.0*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*WL
1.0*DL(Operating)+ 0.7*EL
0.9*DL(Operating)+ 0.7*EL

Hydrotest cond1.0*DL(Hydrotest)
1.0*DL(Hydrotest) + 0.5*WL

1.5.2 Factored load combinations for R.C.C Strength design: Notations For Loads
Ref Appendix A of GB088-2013-200-CV-DB-001 DL - Dead Load
WL- Wind Load
Operating (wit 1.4*DL (Operating) EL- Earthquake Load

Empty Conditi 0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.3*WL

0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.0*EL

Erection Condi0.9*DL(Erection) + 1.04*WL ( 1.3 x 0.8)

Operating Cond
1.2*DL(Operating)+ 1.3*WL
1.2*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL
0.9*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL

Hydrotest cond1.4*DL(Hydrotest )
1.2*DL(Hydrotest) + 0.65*WL

Note: In the above load combinations in all cases DL includes Dead weight of ( footing + pedestal +
backfill + soil + fire proofing) along with applicable vessel weights for different cases (i.e Empty, Erection,
Operating and HydroTest condition)
 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-
ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No
1206-00011

BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION PRE BY

Job No. WG0014
FACILITY VLN

DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY

Rev No.: 02A
N004-V-47001 JKJ

5.0 Summary of results:

Sl No Item Remarks
1 Stability Check Min. F.O.S Actual
F.O.S
Overturning
1.1 0.9*DL(Empty)+1.0*Wind 1.50 8.579 Foundation Safe
1.2 0.9*DL(Empty)+0.7*Earthquake 1.50 13.586 Foundation Safe
1.3 1.0*DL (Erection) + 0.8*Wind 1.00 47.661 Foundation Safe
1.4 1.0*DL (Operating) + 1.0*Wind 1.50 10.664 Foundation Safe
1.5 1.0*DL (Operating) + 0.7*Earthquake 1.50 16.888 Foundation Safe
1.6 0.9*DL (Operating) + 0.7*Earthquake 1.50 15.199 Foundation Safe
Sliding (without Passive)
1.7 0.9*DL(Empty)+1.0*Wind 1.50 9.449 Foundation Safe
1.8 0.9*DL(Empty)+0.7*Earthquake 1.50 17.165 Foundation Safe
1.9 1.0*DL (Erection) + 0.8*Wind 1.00 52.494 Foundation Safe
1.10 1.0*DL (Operating) + 1.0*Wind 1.50 11.745 Foundation Safe
1.11 1.0*DL (Operating) + 0.7*Earthquake 1.50 21.335 Foundation Safe
1.12 0.9*DL (Operating) + 0.7*Earthquake 1.50 19.202 Foundation Safe
2 Bearing Capacity Allowable gross pr. Actual
Gross
(kN/m2) pressure
(kN/m2)

2.1 Gross Bearing Capacity (With 200.80 45.36 Foundation Safe

wind/seismic load)
2.2 Gross Bearing Capacity (Without 163.30 39.90 Foundation Safe
wind/seismic load)

3 Shear Check Allowable shear Shear

stress (N/mm2) stress
ONE WAY SHEAR N/mm2 developed
N/mm2
3.1 Shear stress (at face) 0.675 0.027 Foundation Safe
3.2 Shear stress (at a distance d) 0.675 0.000 Foundation Safe
PUNCHING SHEAR
3.3 Shear stress (at 0.5d) 1.265 0.040 Foundation Safe

4.0 Flexure Check Mu (kNm) f Mn (kNm)

4.1 B.M / Moment of resistance (Bottom) 0.42 43.18 Foundation Safe
4.2 B.M / Moment of resistance (Top face) 0.00 43.18 Foundation Safe
5.0 Reinf. Tension Yeilding Check Reqd. Strain Strain (at
failure)
5.1 Maximum reinforcement at Bottom 0.0021 0.04990 OK ,Yeilding in Ast confirmed
5.2 Maximum reinforcement at Top 0.0021 0.04990 OK ,Yeilding in Ast confirmed
6.0 Reinforcement Design & Capacity Threshold Value Provided
Value
6.1 Steel at Bottom of foudation, mm2/m 270.0 565.49 Foundation Safe
6.2 Steel at Top of foundation, mm2/m 270.0 565.49 Foundation Safe
6.3 Maximum spacing for Bottom Steel, 450.0 200 OK
6.4 mm
Maximum spacing for Top Steel, mm 450.0 200 OK
6.5 Steel in pedestal, mm2 4828.9 7539.8 OK
6.6 Min.clear spacing of reinf in ped. (mm) 150 191 OK
6.7 Design Axial Capacity of Pedestal,(kN) 34196.2 155.33 OK
7.0 Bearing on conc. At pedestal top N/mm2 N/mm2
7.1 Bearing stress beneath base plate 15.47 0.080 OK, Concrete Safe in bearing
8.0 Peripheral reinforcement (Tie)
8.1 Shear capacity of pedestal (kN) 1705.2 4.94 OK
8.2 Maximum spacing of stirrups (mm c/c) 320 150 OK

Reinfrocement Summary :
Bottom reinfrocement along XX direction = 12 mm dia bar 200 mm C/C
Bottom reinfrocement along YY direction = 12 mm dia bar 200 mm C/C
Top reinforcement in both directions = 12 mm dia bar 200 mm C/C
Pedestal longitudinal main Reinforcement = 20 mm dia, Nos24 Nos
Side face or skin reinforcement = N.A
Peripheral reinforcement ( Tie bars ) = 10 mm dia bar 150 mm C/C

N.A means Not Applicable

 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-
U13000-CX-1206-00011
BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT TEG DEHYDRATION PRE BY
Job No. WG0014
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 02A
N004-V-47001 JKJ

INPUT DATA FOR FOUNDATION SUPPORTING VERTICAL VESSELS

Foundation Octagonal base slab with octagonal pedestal

0.870

0.746

b1
1.800

B ( B > b1 )
2.100
FOUNDATION

U/S Base plate

FGL
y= y 0.3

Df = 1.000 (Over all Depth)

Df

0.300 Ts

slab bottom

SKETCH OF FOUNDATION AND GEOMETRY

 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-
U13000-CX-1206-00011
BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT TEG DEHYDRATION PRE BY
Job No. WG0014
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 02A
N004-V-47001 JKJ

Foundation Geometric Data (Refer Sketch for foundation geometry)

Width of Pedestal = b1 1.800 m OK Check for minimum pedestal size:

Minimum pedestal size shall be the larger of the following:
Width of Base Slab = B 2.100 m b2 = (B.C.D+300 mm) 1.645 m
b3 = (B.C.D + 2*Ed) 1.769 m
Thick. of base slab = Ts 0.300 m b4 = (Dbp + 100 mm) 1.535 m
Min. pedestal width = 1.769 m

O/A depth of fdn. ( refer fig. above ) = Df 1.000 m Foundation Depth from F.G.L = 0.7 m

Pedestal projection = y 0.300 m B.C.D

Projection of base plate beyond B.C.D

Anchor Bolt Data (Refer Vendor data)

Number of Anchor Bolts = Nab 4 (Nos)

B b1 do Db
p
Anchor Bolt (AB) Dia = Dab 24 mm

Bolt circle dia of vessel = B.C.D 1.345 m

pedestal
Edge dist of pedestal from C.L of Bolt = Ed 0.212 m

Outer diameter of Circular base plate=Dbp 1.435 m ( Ref. Vessel Vendor Dwg )

Inner dia of annular base plate ring =do 0.800 m If do is not provided, then do = ( B.C.D - 0.3m), will be considered for
calculation. Keep the cell blank if exact data is not known and
Vessel Data (Refer Vendor data) :- shall be re-checked later when data is available.

Empty weight of vessel = We 11.00 kN

Wt of vessel during erection = Wer 11.00 KN Vessel Skirt

Operating Wt.of Vessel = Wo 22.00 kN

Base Plate
Wt.of vessel (hydro-test) = Wh 64.00 kN
do
Diameter of skirt= 1.250 m B.C.D
Dbp
Height of skirt = 1.210 m

Area of base plt. for bearing check = Abp m2 ( Ref. Vessel Vendor Dwg. Keep it Blank if data is not available)

Fire proofing thickness = 0.00 mm

Fire proofing (FP) Material = Fendolite ( Input from the drop down Cell menu )
Whether FP load included in Vendor input ? = NO (If already Fire Proofing (FP) load included in the Vendor provided vertical
load input then,select " YES" otherwise select "NO"from the dropdown )
Load data (Refer Vendor data ):-

Wind Moment during erection/empty = Me 7.12 kN.m

Wind shear during erection/empty = Ve 3.09 kN

Wind moment during operation = Mo 7.12 kN.m

Wind shear during operation = Vo 3.09 kN

Wind moment during HydroTest = Mh 7.12 kN.m Shear and moment is reduced to 50% in hydrotest condition.

Wind shear during HydroTest = Vh 3.09 kN

Seismic moment during erection = 0.00 kN.m Note:

Seismic shear during erection = 0.00 kN Seismic loading under erection condition is not considered.
Seismic moment during operation = 6.78 kN.m Hence seismic moment and shear values under erection
Seismic shear during operation = 2.43 kN condition are considered as zero.

Seismic moment vessel empty = 6.78 kN.m These Values are worked on basis of empty weight of vessel.
Seismic shear Vessel empty = 2.43 kN

Material data

Density of Concrete = g c 25.00 kN/m3 Ref CL 3.7.1 of Civil & Structural Design Basis
Density of overburden soil = g s 19.00 kN/m3 Ref CL 3.7.1 of Civil & Structural Design Basis
 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-
U13000-CX-1206-00011
BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT TEG DEHYDRATION PRE BY
Job No. WG0014
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 02A
N004-V-47001 JKJ

RCC Design data :-

Cylinder Comp. strength of conc( fc')= fck 28.00 N/mm2 Ref CL 7.1.1 of Civil & Structural Design Basis

Yield strength of reinforcement = fst 420.00 N/mm2 Ref CL 7.1.2 of Civil & Structural Design Basis

Type of Coating on reinforcement = Uncoated Ref CL 12.5.2 of ACI-318-11

Compressive strength of grout ( fg' ) = 24.00 N/mm2

Modulus of elasticity of reinf. = Es 200000 N/mm2 Ref CL 7.1.2 of Civil & Structural Design Basis

Clear cover to concrete = cov 75.00 mm Ref CL 7.1.4 of Civil & Structural Design Basis

Dia of bottom bar = d1_a 12 mm

OK > Minimum
C/C Spacing of bottom bar = Sp1_a 200 mm (to be provided at bottom along bothways)

Dia of Top bar ( if reqd.) = d1_b 12 mm

OK > Minimum
C/C Spacing of Top bar = Sp1_b 200 mm (to be provided at top along bothways)

Dia of pedestal bars = d_2 20 mm

Clear spacing for pedestal bars = Spc 150 mm OK

Dia.of pedestal peripheral tie bars = dt 10 mm (Spacing and configuration of tie bars shall comply CL.7.10.5 of ACI-318)
Vertical spacing of tie bar = Sv 150 mm

F.O.S against Overturning = 1.5 = F_1 Ref CL 6.1.2 of Civil & Structural Design Basis
F.O.S against Sliding = 1.5 = F_1 Ref CL 6.1.2 of Civil & Structural Design Basis
F.O.S against Overturning (seismic)= 1.5 = F_1 Ref CL 6.1.2 of Civil & Structural Design Basis
Operating condition only
F.O.S against Sliding (seismic)= 1.5 = F_1 Ref CL 6.1.2 of Civil & Structural Design Basis

Soil Data
Allowable bearing capacity of soil = 150.00 kN/m2
% increase of soil perm. Soil pressure = 25% (For Wind condition)
% increase of soil perm. Soil pressure = 25% (For Earthquake condition)
Ref Geotechnical Report
Friction Coeff. between soil & concrete = m 0.35
Ground water table from FGL = 4m
Coefficient of Passive pressure = Kp 0
Whether to consider Passive Pressure ? NO

WF1 74.33 kN (Weight of foundation if foundation type is 1)

WS1 7.36 kN (Weight of over burden soil if foundation type is 1)
Unit Weight of fire proofing Material = 7 kN/m3
Wt of fire proofing ( bothside of skirt ) = 0.00 kN ( Fire Proofing is considered on both side of skirt. Conservatively this is ignored for
Wt of concrete = 74.33 kN Stability Calculation but Considered for Bearing Pressure Check )
Wt of overburden soil = 7.36 kN
Bouyance weight = 0.00 kN
Overburden pressure = 7.60 kN/m2
Volume of concrete = 2.97 m3
Calculation of Passive Resistance: ( Contribution of Passive Resistance has not been considered )

P (Fp1)
z
H KP*gs*(D1-Ts) N.A kN/m2
y

D1=(Df-y)= 0.700

Ts

(Fp2)
(m *P KP*gs*D1 N.A kN/m2
z)
Resistance due to passive pr. at the slab face = B*0.5*(Fp1+Fp2)*Ts = Fp = 0.00 kN
 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No
0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-1206-00011
PRE BY
BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION FACILITY Job No. WG0014
VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
N004-V-47001 Rev No.: 02A
JKJ

Bearing Capacity and Stability Check :

Check stability of foundation under various load conditions

Stability calculation
W = 83.42 KN
Vessel Empty Condition = i) 0.9*DL (Empty) +1.0 WL ii) 0.9*DL (Empty) +0.7 EL
Overturning Vt = 3.1 kN Mt =10.21 kN.m
Wind moment = (7.12 + 3.09*1)= 10.21 kN.m

Seismic moment = 0.7 *(6.78 + 2.43*1)= 6.45 kN.m

Weight of RCC foundation = 0.9*74.33 = 66.90 KN h=1m

Weight of overburden soil = 0.9*7.36 = 6.62 KN

Wt of vessel (Empty condition) = 0.9*11 = 9.90 kN
Bouyant weight = 0.00 kN
X
Total weight (W) = 83.42 KN
0.5*B= 1.05 m
Resisitive moment (Mr = WxB/2) = 0.5*83.421 * 2.1 = 87.6 kN.m
FREE BODY DIAGRAM FOR OVERTURNING
Maxm. Toppling Moment (Mt) = 10.21 kN.m ABOUT THE LINE THROUGH X

i) F.O.S(Mr/Mt) = 87.59/10.21 = 8.579 > 1.5 Foundation Safe

ii) F.O.S(Mr/Mt) = 87.59/6.45 = 13.586 > 1.5 Foundation Safe
Sliding
Wind shear (Fs) = 3.09 KN
Seismic shear = 1.70 KN
Resisting Friction (Fr) = ( m*W ) 83.42*0.35 29.20 KN

i) F.O.S(Fr/Fs) = 29.2 / 3.09 9.449 > 1.5 Foundation Safe

ii) F.O.S(Fr/Fs) = 29.2 / 1.7 17.165 > 1.5 Foundation Safe

Vessel Erection Condition = 1.0 DL (Erection) +0.2 WL

Overturning
Wind moment = 0.2*( 7.12 + 3.09*1 ) 2.04 kN.m

Weight of RCC foundation = 74.33 KN

Weight of overburden soil = 7.36 KN
Wt of vessel (Erection condition) = 11.00 kN
Bouyant weight = 0.00 kN

Total weight (W) = 92.69 KN

Resisitive moment (Mr = WxB/2) = 0.5*92.69 * 2.1 = 97.3 kN.m

Maxm. Toppling Moment (Mt) = 2.04 kN.m

F.O.S(Mr/Mt) = 97.32/2.04 = 47.661 > 1.5 Foundation Safe

 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No
0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-1206-00011
PRE BY
BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION FACILITY Job No. WG0014
VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
N004-V-47001 Rev No.: 02A
JKJ
Sliding
Wind shear (Fs) = 0.2*( 3.09 ) 0.62 KN
Resisting Friction (Fr) = ( m*W ) 92.69*0.35 = 32.44 KN

F.O.S(Fr/Fs) = 32.44 / 0.62 52.494 > 1.5 Foundation Safe

Vessel Operating condition :-Load Comb = i) 1.0*DL (Operating) + 1.0*WL ii) 1.0*DL(Operating) + 0.7*EL iii) 0.9*DL(Operating) + 0.7*EL
Overturning
Wind Moment = 7.12 + 3.09 * 1 10.21 kN.m

Seismic moment = 0.7*(6.78 + 2.43*1)= 6.45 kN.m

Weight of RCC foundation = 74.33 KN 66.90 KN

Weight of overburden soil= 7.36 KN 6.62 KN
Wt of vessel (operating) = 22.00 kN 19.80 KN
Bouyant weight = 0.00 0.00

Total weight (W) = 103.69 KN 93.32 KN

Resisitive momnt(Mr = WxB/2)= 0.5*103.69 * 2.1 = 108.9 kN.m 98.0 kN.m
Maxm. Toppling Moment (Mt) = 10.21 kN.m

i) F.O.S(Mr/Mt) = 108.87/10.21 = 10.664 > 1.5 Foundation Safe

ii) F.O.S(Mr/Mt) = 108.87/6.447 = 16.888 > 1.5 Foundation Safe
iii) F.O.S(Mr/Mt) = 97.99/6.447 = 15.199 > 1.5 Foundation Safe
Sliding
Wind shear (Fs) = 3.09 KN
Seismic shear = 1.70 KN
Resisting Friction (Fr) = ( m*W) 103.69*0.35 = 36.29 KN 32.66 KN

i) F.O.S(Fr/Fs) = 36.29 / 3.09 11.745 > 1.5 Foundation Safe

ii) F.O.S(Fr/Fs) = 36.29 / 1.7 21.335 > 1.5 Foundation Safe
iii) F.O.S(Fr/Fs) = 32.66 / 1.7 19.202 > 1.5 Foundation Safe
 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No
0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-1206-00011
PRE BY
BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION FACILITY Job No. WG0014
VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
N004-V-47001 Rev No.: 02A
JKJ

Calculation of Base pressure below footing mat:

m
Geometric Property of foundation

Bearing Area of Foundation base

slab Af = 0.828*B^2 3.65 m2
2.1
Min. Section Modulus of Fdn about
(m-m) axis = Zmm = 0.1011*B^3 0.94 m3

Calculation of soil pressure under various load combination m

Foundation load + overburden soil = = 74.33 + 7.36 = 81.69 kN

Wt of fire proofing (considering both side of the skirt) 0= 0.00 kN

Load case-2: 0.9* DL(empty) + 1.0*WL is explained below in details :

Design vertical load (P)=(Fdn wt+ Soil wt+Empty wt.)

=0.9*( 74.33+7.36+ 0+11) = 83.42 kN
Design moment(M) = 7.12 + 3.09*1= 10.21 kNm
Pressure due to vertical load p1 (P/A) = 83.421 / 3.651= 22.85 kN/m2
Pressure due to moment p2 (M/Z) = 10.21 / 0.936= 10.91 kN/m2
p1+p2 = 22.849 + 10.908 = 33.76 kN/m2
p1-p2 = 22.849 - 10.908 = 11.94 kN/m2
e (M/P) = 10.21 / 83.421 = 0.1224 m
e/df , where = df is the dia of the inscribed circle =1.041*B = 0.122391 / (1.041*2.1) 0.060 Figure 5 -14 Page 145
C1 (Co-efficient from Hand book of concrete engineering by Mark-Fintel) = 1.000 Hand book of Concrete engineering by Mark Fintel
C2 (Co-efficient from Hand book of concrete engineering by Mark-Fintel) = 1.480 For octagonal bases df shall be taken as 1.041*(Width), where, df is the
dia of inscribed circle.
Modified stress (C2*P1) = 1.48 * 22.849 = 33.76 kN/m2
Allowable gross pressure = 150*1.25 + 19*(1-0.3) = 200.80 kN/m2
Percent increase of soil permissible pressure due to wind = 25%
Percent increase of soil permissible pressure due to earthquake = 25%
 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No
0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-1206-00011
PRE BY
BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION FACILITY Job No. WG0014
VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
N004-V-47001 Rev No.: 02A
JKJ

Allowable gross bearing pressure below footing : 1) Without Wind / Seismic: 163.30 kN/m2
2) With Wind : 200.80 kN/m2
3) With Earthquake: 200.80 kN/m2
Calculation of Basic Loads:
DL (Empty) = Empty weight of Vessel + Footing Wt + Pedestal Wt + Wt of Over burden+ Wt of Fire proofing = 92.69 kN
DL (Erection) = Erection weight of Vessel + Footing Wt + Pedestal Wt + Wt of Over burden+Wt of fire proofing = 92.69 kN
DL (Operating) = Operating weight of Vessel (i.e empty+content) + Footing Wt + Pedestal Wt + Wt of Over burden+Wt of fire proofing = 103.69 kN
DL (Hydrotest) = Hydrotest weight of Vessel + Footing Wt + Pedestal Wt + Wt of Over burden+Wt of fire proofing = 145.69 kN

TABLE-1
Other load cases are similarly computed and tabulated below :

Total Mod.
Load DL from DL from fire Total Moment Pressur
case Load combination DL of vessel DL from Soil footing proofing Moment Shear Load (P) (M) p1(P/A) p2(M/Z) p1+p2 p1-p2 e(M/P) e/df C1 C2 e (Max) Result
2001 1.0* DL(Operating) 22.0 7.4 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 103.7 0.0 28.4 0.0 28.4 28.4 0.00 0.000 1.00 1.00 28.4 O.K
2002 0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.0*WL 9.9 6.6 66.9 0.0 7.1 3.1 83.4 10.2 22.849 10.9 33.8 11.9 0.12 0.060 1.00 1.480 33.8 O.K
2003 0.9*DL(Empty) + 0.7*EL 9.9 6.6 66.9 0.0 4.7 1.7 83.4 6.4 22.8 6.9 29.7 16.0 0.08 0.040 1.00 1.32 29.7 O.K
2004 1.0*DL(Erection) + 0.5*WL 11.0 7.4 74.3 0.0 3.6 1.5 92.7 5.1 25.4 5.5 30.8 19.9 0.06 0.030 1.00 1.24 30.8 O.K
2005 1.0*DL(Operating) + 1.0*WL 22.0 7.4 74.3 0.0 7.1 3.1 103.7 10.2 28.4 10.9 39.3 17.5 0.10 0.050 1.00 1.40 39.3 O.K
2006 1.0*DL(Operating)+0.7*EL 22.0 7.4 74.3 0.0 4.7 1.7 103.7 6.4 28.4 6.9 35.3 21.5 0.06 0.030 1.00 1.24 35.3 O.K
2007 0.9*DL(Operating)+0.7*EL 19.8 6.6 66.9 0.0 4.7 1.7 93.3 6.4 25.6 6.9 32.4 18.7 0.07 0.040 1.00 1.32 32.4 O.K
2008 1.0*DL (Hydrotest wt.) 64.0 7.4 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 145.7 0.0 39.9 0.0 39.9 39.9 0.00 0.000 1.00 1.00 39.9 O.K
2009 1.0*DL (Hydrotest wt.) + 0.5*WL 64.0 7.4 74.3 0.0 3.6 1.5 145.7 5.1 39.9 5.5 45.4 34.5 0.04 0.020 1.00 1.16 45.4 O.K
NOTE : 0.9DL(Operating) + 1.0 WL combination neglected as earthquake is governing.

R.C.C. DESIGN OF FOOTING MAT AND PEDESTAL: THIS DESIGN IS VALID ONLY AS PER ACI - 318 : 2011 CODE Base Pressure Check = OK
Max. gross base Pr. with WL/ EL = 45.4 kN/m2
Factored Load and Base Pressure Calculation : Max. gross base Pr. without WL/EL = 39.9 kN/m2

Calculation of various parameters in the following table are same as explained above, except loads are multiplied by load factors.
If entire footing base is in contact with soil, then redistribution of soil pressure is not required, hence, ( P/A+M/Z ) will give the maximum pressure.
If tension below footing occurs then ,Modified Gross Pressure =C2*p1 would be used for design.

B.M at the face of the pedestal has been calculated using gross maximum pressure and then to obtain net effect, B.M resulting from overburden has been deducted.

Factored load combinations for R.C.C design: TABLE-2

Design Design Over-

Load DL from DL from fire Factored Factored Load (P) Moment Modified burden
case Load combination Fact. Vertical load (P) DL from Soil footing proofing Moment Shear (kN) M (kNm) p1(P/A) p2(M/Z) p1+p2 p1-p2 e(M/P) e/df C1 C2 Stress stress
1001 1.4*DL (Operating) 30.8 10.3 104.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 145.2 0.0 39.76 0.00 39.8 39.8 0.00 0.000 1.000 1.00 39.76 18.62
1002 0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.6*WL 9.9 6.6 66.9 0.0 11.4 4.9 83.4 16.3 22.85 17.45 40.3 5.4 0.20 0.090 1.000 1.72 40.30 11.97
1003 0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.0*EL 9.9 6.6 66.9 0.0 6.8 2.4 83.4 9.2 22.85 9.84 32.7 13.0 0.11 0.051 1.000 1.41 32.69 11.97
1004 0.9*DL(Erection) + 0.8*WL 9.9 6.6 66.9 0.0 5.7 2.5 83.4 8.2 22.85 8.73 31.6 14.1 0.10 0.045 1.000 1.36 31.58 11.97
1005 1.2*DL(Operating) + 1.6*WL 26.4 8.8 89.2 0.0 11.4 4.9 124.4 16.3 34.08 17.45 51.5 16.6 0.13 0.061 1.000 1.49 51.53 15.96
1006 1.2*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 26.4 8.8 89.2 0.0 6.8 2.4 124.4 9.2 34.08 9.84 43.9 24.2 0.07 0.034 1.000 1.27 43.92 15.96
1007 0.9*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 19.8 6.6 66.9 0.0 6.8 2.4 93.3 9.2 25.56 9.84 35.4 15.7 0.10 0.046 1.000 1.37 35.40 15.96
1008 1.4*DL (Hydrotest) 89.6 10.3 104.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 204.0 0.0 55.87 0.00 55.9 55.9 0.00 0.000 1.000 1.00 55.87 18.62
1009 1.2*DL (Hydrotest) + 0.8* WL 76.8 8.8 89.2 0.0 5.7 2.5 174.8 8.2 47.88 8.73 56.6 39.2 0.05 0.022 1.000 1.18 56.61 18.62
Maximum Gross base Pressure = 56.61 (kN/m2)
 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No
0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-1206-00011
PRE BY
BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION FACILITY Job No. WG0014
VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
N004-V-47001 Rev No.: 02A
JKJ

Gross maximum Soil pressure below footing base = 56.61 kN/m2

Factored overburden pressure corresponding to Maximum gross pressure = s ob = 18.62 kN/m2 (Refer figure below)
Projection beyond pedestal/skirt = = 0.5*(2.1 - 1.8) = 0.15 m
Effective depth of footing ( for main = 0.3 - 75/1000-1.5*12/1000 = 0.207 m
Coefficient of contact of footing sla = C1 = 1.000 (Refer figures given in the next page for CASE-1, CASE-2 )
Length of footing base slab in conta = L1 = C1*df = 1 *(1.041* 2.1) = 2.100 m Hence, the full footing base is in contact with soil, CASE-1 is applicable
Minimum pressure under the footing base slab = 39.16 kN/m2
Applicable case for calculation of maximum B.M and S.F = CASE = 1 (Refer figures given below for CASE-1, 2 )

Critical section for B.M

Critical section for S.F

L L L
s ob
(L-d) D
(L-d)
L
1-
L

s MIN s1 s1
s1 s3 s MAX
s1 s MAX
s3
s MAX s2
s4
s2 L L1
B1 1

CASE-1 CASE-2
CASE- III

CASE-1 : B= 2.273 m [ Note: Here, Length of diagonal of octagon has been considered so, modified B = 1.0824*(actual width of footing) ]
L= 0.15 m
d= 0.207 m
L1 = 2.10 m
s min = 39.16 kN/m2
s max = 56.61 kN/m2
s = s max-s min = 17.45 kN/m2
Base pressure at the face of the pedestal, s 1= s min+ [ (B-L)/B ]*s = 55.46 kN/m2
Base pressure at a dist d from the face of the pedestal, s 3=s min+ [ (B-L+d)/B ]*s = 55.46 kN/m2 (If L< d, then the formula is same as for s 1)
Magnitude of the differential pressure (w.r.t s 1) at max pr. Location, s 2 = (s max-s 1) 1.15 kN/m2
Magnitude of the differential pressure (w.r.t s 3) at max pr. Location, s 4 = (s max-s 3) 1.15 kN/m2
 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No
0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-1206-00011
PRE BY
BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION FACILITY Job No. WG0014
VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
N004-V-47001 Rev No.: 02A
JKJ
B.M at the face of the pedestal due to factored overburden, BM1= s ob*L2 / 2 0.21 kN.m/m width
S.F at a dist d from the face of the pedestal due to factored overburden, SF1 = s ob*(L-d) 0.00 kN/m width
S.F at the face of the pedestal due to factored overburden, SF2 = s ob*(L) 2.79 kN/m width
B.M at the face of the pedestal due to gross pr. = B.M2 = s 1*L2/2 + s 2*L2/3 0.63 kN.m/m width
S.F at a dist.d from the face of the ped. due to gross pr. = S.F3 = s 3*(L-d) + 0.5*s 4*(L-d) 0.00 kN/m width
S.F at the face of the pedestal due to gross pr.= S.F4 = s 1*L + 0.5*s 2*L 8.41 kN/m width

Net design B.M and S.F for CASE-1 :

B.M at the face of pedestal, B.M =(BM2 - BM1) = 0.42 kN.m/m width
S.F at a dist.d from the face of the ped., S.F = (SF3-SF1) = 0.00 kN/m width
S.F at the face of the pedestal , S.F = (SF4-SF2) = 5.61 kN/m width

CASE-2 : B= 2.273 m
L= 0.15 m
d= 0.207 m
L1 = N.A m
s min = N.A kN/m2
s max = N.A kN/m2
s = s max-s min = N.A kN/m2
Base pressure at the face of the pedestal, s 1= [ (L1-L)/L1 ]*s max = N.A kN/m2
Base pressure at a dist d from the face of the pedestal, s 3=[ (L1-L+d)/L1 ]*s max = N.A kN/m2 (If L< d, then the formula is same as for s 1)
Magnitude of the differential pressure (w.r.t s1) at max pr. Location, s 2 = (s max-s 1) N.A kN/m2
Magnitude of the differential pressure (w.r.t s3) at max pr. Location, s 4 = (s max-s 3) N.A kN/m2
B.M at the face of the pedestal due to factored overburden, BM1= s ob*(L2 / 2) N.A kN.m/m width
S.F at a dist d from the face of the pedestal due to factored overburden, SF1 = s ob*(L-d) N.A kN/m width
S.F at the face of the pedestal due to factored overburden, SF2 = s ob*(L) N.A kN/m width
B.M at the face of the pedestal = B.M2 = s 1*L2/2 + s 2*L2/3 N.A kN.m/m width
S.F at a dist d from the face of the pedestal = S.F3 = s 3*(L-d) + 0.5*s 4*(L-d) N.A kN/m width
S.F at the face of the pedestal = S.F4 = s 1*L + 0.5*s 2*L N.A kN/m width

Net design B.M and S.F for CASE-2 :

B.M at the face of pedestal, B.M =(BM2 - BM1) = N.A kN.m/m width
S.F at a dist. d from the face of the ped., S.F = (SF3-SF1) = N.A kN/m width
S.F at the face of the pedestal , S.F = (SF4-SF2) = N.A kN/m width

N.A means Not Applicable

FINAL VALUES FOR STRENGTH DESIGN :

Maximum factored B.M at edge of pedestal 0.42 kN.m/m width

Factored Moment on top face ( g f used = 1.4 ) 0.00 kNm/m width I:\Active Projects - Dubai\BGC EPS Contract\WG_BGC_Contract_Disciplines\02-Civil\WG0014-Zubair Hammar PSF TEG - FEED\Calculations & Drawings\
Maximum factored shear at distance d from pedestal 0.00 kN/m width
Maximum factored shear at face of the pedestal 5.61 kN/m width
ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-
1206-00011

BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION PRE BY

Job No. WG0011
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 1
N004-V-47001 JKJ

Strength Design of foundation

THIS DESIGN IS VALID ONLY AS PER ACI - 318 : 2011 CODE

Basic equation for strength design is as follows :

Ref. Clause 10.2.7 ACI-318:11

Where, Mn = Nominal moment capacity of section
Mu = Required moment capacity of the section

Note: Nominal moment strength calculation is based on

the tension controlled section. i.e stress in steel Fs = Fy
Ref. Clause 10.2.1 to 10.2.7 ACI-318:11
where, Total comp. force,
The nominal moment strength is given as mentioned below: b = Width of the section
a = Depth of compression block
Ref. Clause 10.2.7 ACI-318:11 b 1 = Neutral axis depth factor
c = Neutral axis depth of section
Bottom Reinforcement: Cc = Total comp force in the concrete,
Design bending Moment (at bottom) Mub = 0.42 kN.m/m width T =Total tensile force in steel = As* Fy
Design bending Moment (at top) Mut = 0.00 kNm/m width e c = Strain in the extreme fiber of conc.
Strength reduction factor-1 for flexure f fbt = 0.90 (Tension controlled) e st = Strain in the steel,
Strength reduction factor-2 for flexure f fbc = 0.65 (Comp. controlled) For tension yeilding e st > e y > 0.2 %)
Strength reduction factor for Shear fs =
0.75 Refer CL 9.3.2 ACI- From the equilibrium, T = Cc
318-11
Strength reduction factor for bearing fb =
0.65 Neutral axis depth, can be calculated.
Effective depth of the section d= 0.207 m
Minimum Ast required = 0.09% of Ag Ast,min = 270 mm2/m Ref. Clause 10.5.4 & 7.12.2.1 ACI-318-11
Note: Half of 0.18% (i.e 0.09%) is taken as minimum reinforcement of bottom and same applies for top ,hence total=0.18% of Ag
Yeild strength of reinforcement fy = 420 N/mm2
Characteristic strength of conc. fc' = 28 N/mm2
Reinf. dia & spacing for footing slab = 12 mm dia @ 200mm c/c (provided at bottom along bothways)
Maximum spacing of reinforcement = MIN ( 3*d or 450 mm) < = Maximum spacing, OK Ref. Cl 10.5.4 ACI-318
Area of Reinforcement provided Ast,prov = ### mm2/m > Minimum,OK
Percent of reinforcement provided r, prov = 0.27% (r,prov = 100*Ast/b*def, where, b = 1000mm )
Concrete Stress block depth factor b1 = 0.850 (b1 = 0.85-(0.05/7)*(fc'-28)) Ref. Explanation of CL 10.2.7
Maximum permissible reinforcement r ,max = 1.806% (r,max = 0.85*fc'*b1*(0.375)/Fy) for tension controlled section
Percent of steel for balance failure r ,b = 2.833% ( r,max= 0.625*r,b) Ref. Explanation of CL 9.3.2.2 ACI-318
Nominal moment strength Mn = 48.0 kN.m/m

Check for Tension yielding for reinf. and Calculation of f factor:

Depth of the rect. stress block in compression a =As*Fy/(.85fc')*b 9.979 mm
Depth of the neutral axis of the section c = a/b 1 11.740 mm Ref. CL 10.2.7 ACI-318-11
Minimum strain in steel at which yeilding occurs e sy= Fy/Es = 0.002
Maximum strain Iin concrete in compression e c= 0.003 Ref. CL 10.2.3 ACI-318-11
Strain in the steel for Ast,prov e st= [ (d-c)/c ]*e c 0.04990 OK ,Yeilding in Ast confirmed
Hence, the section is a Tension controlled Section as per Clause 10.3.4 ACI-318M-11
Effective reduction factor for flexure = 0.65 + (e st - 0.002)*(250/3) 0.900 Ref. R 9.3.2 ACI-318-11
Reduced Nominal Moment capacity = Mnc = f fb*Mn 43.18 > Mu = 0.42 , OK, Section Safe
ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-
1206-00011

BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION PRE BY

Job No. WG0011
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 1
N004-V-47001 JKJ

Top Reinforcement:
Note: Clause No 7.12.2.1 of ACI-318-11 requires the minimum reinforcement for slabs for shrinkage and
temperature effect shall be 0.18% of the gross area and this may be distributed to top and botton face as deemed
necessary. Hence, at top it is sufficient to provide 0.09% (which is half of the total required) as minimum reinforcement.
Effective depth of the section = d_top = 0.207 m
Factored Moment at top face Mut = 0.00 kN.m/m
Minimum area of reinforcement Ast,min = 270.0 mm2/m ( half of the minimum 0.18% =0.09%)
Reinf. dia & spacing for footing slab f d and Sp = 12 mm dia @ 200mm c/c
Maximum spacing of reinforcement = MIN ( 3*d_top or 450 mm) < = Maximum spacing, OK Ref. Cl 10.5.4 ACI-318
Area of top reinforcement porovided Ast,prov = 565.49 mm2/m > Minimum,OK
Nominal Moment. strength of the section Mn = 47.98 kN.m/m

Check for Tension yielding for reinf. and Calculation of f factor:

Depth of the rect. stress block in compression a =As*Fy/(0.85fc')*b 9.979 mm
Depth of the neutral axis of the section c = a/b 1 11.740 mm Ref. CL 10.2.7 ACI-318M-11
Minimum strain in steel at which yeilding occurs e sy= Fy/Es = 0.002
Maximum strain Iin concrete in compression e c= 0.003 Ref. CL 10.2.3 ACI-318-11
Strain in the steel for Ast,prov e st= [ (d-c)/c ]*e c 0.04990 OK ,Yeilding in Ast confirmed
Hence, the section is a Tension controlled Section as per Clause 10.3.4 ACI-318M-11
Effective reduction factor for flexure = 0.65 + (e st - 0.002)*(250/3) 0.900 Ref. R 9.3.2 ACI-318-11
Reduced Nominal Moment capacity = Mnt = f fb*Mn 43.18 > Mu = 0 , OK, Section Safe

Hatched portion = Tributary

B area for Two-way shear
CHECK FOR SHEAR :- 2 1
force calculation.
b1
1
critical X
sections

c1 L

Equivalent Square of the

d octagonal pedestal
0.5*d
b1+d
Critical Section
for one-way shear
fig-2
fig-1
Geometric Properties for octagonal footing Mat/Slab:

Plan Area Af = 0.82842*B2

Length of side L= 0.41421*B

Length X= 0.29289*B

Basic equation for design of cross-section subjected to shear is given below:

Ref. CL 11.1.1 of ACI-318-11

Check for one-way Shear (Wide beam action) :

Nominal Shear strength of concrete alone is given by the equation :
Ref. CL 11.2.1.1 of ACI-318-11

8.3 MPa Ref. CL 11.1.2 of ACI-318-11 ( Ref. CL 8.6.1 of ACI-318-11 )

Modification factor for the density of concrete l= 1.00 ( For light wt =0.85, for Normal Wt =1.0 and interpolation permissble )

Value for (for the grade of concrete used) = 5.292 < 8.3 Mpa, OK
Effective depth of the section = def = 0.207 mm
Nominal Shear resistance by concrete alone Vnc = 186.2 kN/m width
Reduced Nominal shear stress = ftvn = 0.675 N/mm2
Reduced Nominal shear resistance = f sVnc = 139.7 kN/m width
Projection of the footing slab beyond pedestal = Lsh = 0.150 m
 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-
1206-00011

BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION PRE BY

Job No. WG0011
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 1
N004-V-47001 JKJ
(i) Check at a dist.d from the face of the pedestal :
Shear force at the critical section = Vu = 0.0 kN/m width
Shear stress at the Section-1 = t vu1 = Vu/bd = 0.000 N/mm2 OK, Foundation is safe in shear
(ii) Check at the face of the pedestal :
Shear force at the critical section = Vu = 5.6 kN/m width
Shear stress at the Section-2 = t vu2 = Vu/bd 0.027 N/mm2 OK, Foundation is safe in shear

Check two-way shear (Punching) :

(This Check considers the effect of transfer of unbalanced moments from column to slab Ref CL. 11.11.7 of ACI318-11)
One of the following three cases may arise:
CASE-1: Critical shear perimeter (at a dist. d/2 from the face of the pedestal) is within the octagonal Mat (refer fig-3)
CASE-2: Critical shear perimeter is falling partially outside the octagonal footing Mat (refer fig-4)
CASE-3: Critical shear perimeter section lies entirely outside the octagonal footing Mat (refer fig-5)

x5
B
CCD CAB
c1+d = 2x1
x5 = B - 2*x3 x4
c2+d
Critical Section
x3
x1
0.5*x2
x2
c1 c1+d

Critical Section

0.5*d
c2 c1 Critical section falling outside the
footing Mat. Punching check not
CAB CCD required.

fig-3 (CASE-1) fig-5 (CASE-3)

fig-4 (CASE-2)

Check the applicable Case for punching = CASE-2 (c1+d)>x5 (c1+d) = 2x1 = 1.845 m
Note:A hypothetical square of side x5 is conservatively considered for CASE-2. x1 = 0.5*(c1+d) = 0.922 m
Column Type based on location Col = Interior column x2 = 0.4142*B = 0.870 m
Width of octagonal pedestal b1 = 1.80 m x3 = (x1- 0.5*x2) = 0.488 m
Width of footing base slab B= 2.10 m x4 = ( 0.5*B - x1) = 0.128 m
Perimeter at the critical section of Mat , bo = 4*( x5 ) = 4.50 m x5 = ( B - 2*x3 ) = 1.125 m
Two-way shear resistance shall be taken as the minimum of (a), (b) & (c)
Ratio of longerside to shorter side b= 1 ( for octagonal / equivalent square pedestal )
Factor for depending on col location as = 40 Ref. CL 11.11.2.1 of ACI-318M-11
Nominal shear strength of concrete for two way action of a slab is given by the following equation:

Two-way shear capacity of concrete alone (No shear reinforcement) is calculated below : ( Ref. CL 11.11.2.1 of ACI-318M-11 )

2513.6265 kN

1570.92 kN

1626.4642 kN

Minimum nominal punching strength Vpn = MIN(a, b, c) 1570.92 kN

Reduced strength in punching shear Vp =fs*Vpn 1178.19 kN
Permissible punching shear stress t p =Vp/(bo*d) 1.265 N/mm2
ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-
1206-00011

BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION PRE BY

Job No. WG0011
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 1
N004-V-47001 JKJ

Calculation of developed Punching Stress:

Note: The Punching shear calculation is valid only for an interior column where the critical shear section forms a closed
area and the centroidal axis lies along the center line of the pedestal but for an edge or corner column all calculation has to
be w.r.t the actual calculated centroidal axis. The parameter Jc (analogous to polar moment of inertia) has to be calculated
about the actual centroidal axis along with other forces.

Cross-sectional area of the octagon pedestal,Aped =0.828*b12 = 2.68 m2

Side of the equivalent square of the octagonal pedestal = 1.64 m
Hence, the length of the transformed pedestal, c1= c2 = 1.64 m
Hence, the Centroidal Axis of the shear perimeter lies exactly along the centre line of the octagonal/equivalent square column

Area within the punching perimeter, Apc =0.828*(b1+d)2 = 3.34 m2

Total base area of footing, Af = 0. 8284*B 2
3.65 m2
Tributary area for punching shear Ap =Af-Apc, if Af > Apc 0.32 m2 ( Refer fig -2, hatched portion )
Area of punching shear stress calculation, Ac =bo*d 0.931 m2
The factored shear stress considering the co-existing effect of punching due to shear force, Vup and Torsional moment, Mu
shall be calculated as per the following equations: Ref. Cl. R11.11.7.2 of ACI-318-11
t u(AB) =[ Vup/AC ] + [ g v*Mu*cAB/JC ] ------------(1) where,cAB = 0.5*(c1+d) = 0.922 m
t u(CD) =[ Vup/AC ] - [ g v*Mu*cCD/JC ] ------------(2) where,cCD = 0.5*(c1+d) = 0.922 m
The fraction of unbalanced M to be transferred by flexure,g f = 0.60 60 % transferred through flexure
( Ref cl.13.5.3.2 ACI-318M-11 )
The fraction of M to be transferred by Shear, g v= ( 1-g f ) = 0.40 40 % transferred through Shear from Torsional Mt.
Property of the critical shear section (anlogous to J), JC = [ d*(c1+d)3/6 ] + [ (c1+d)*d3/6 ] + [ d*(c1+d)2*(c2+d)/2 ] (for CASE-1)
JC = [ d*(x5)3/6 ] + [ (x5)*d3/6 ] + [ (x5)*d*(x5)2*/2 ] (for CASE-2)
Note: A hypothetical square of side x5 has been conservatively considered for Jc calculation for CASE-2.
Polar moment of inertia about centroidal axis, JC = 0.20 m4
Calculation of Punching Shear Stress: RV = g v*cAB/JC = 1.8625 m-3
Vup and Mu are calculated as per formula indicated below:
Vup =( Total vertical load at base )*(Ap /Af) = The fraction of total vertical load contributing in developing punching shear stress
Mu = Moment at the junction of footing slab and pedestal
Load combinations Vup Mu Vup/Ac g V*Mu*cAB/Jc t 1+t 2 t 1-t 2 Remark

(kN) (kNm) t 1 (N/mm2) t 2 (N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2)

1.4*DL (Operating) 12.64 0.00 0.014 0.000 0.014 0.014 OK

0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.6*WL 7.26 15.13 0.008 0.028 0.036 -0.020 OK

0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.0*EL 7.26 8.48 0.008 0.016 0.024 -0.008 OK

0.9*DL(Erection) + 0.4*WL 7.26 7.20 0.008 0.013 0.021 -0.006 OK

1.2*DL(Operating) + 1.6*WL 10.83 15.13 0.012 0.028 0.040 -0.017 OK

1.2*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 10.83 8.48 0.012 0.016 0.027 -0.004 OK

0.9*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 8.12 8.48 0.009 0.016 0.025 -0.007 OK

1.4*DL (Hydrotest) 17.76 0.00 0.019 0.000 0.019 0.019 OK

1.2*DL (Hydrotest) + 0.80* WL 15.22 7.57 0.016 0.014 0.030 0.002 OK

Check against Punching Shear = OK Maximum Punching stress develop = 0.040 N/mm2
Permissible punching stress of footing slab = 1.265 N/mm2
Bearing Stress on Concrete :
Note: Bearing pressure on concrete has been calculated assuming the base plate to be Annular. If this assumption does
not hold good then, separate calculation for bearing check on concrete can be done as per the actual base plate size and shape

Design Bearing Pressure u/s base plt sb,max =f*(0.85*fc') 15.47 N/mm2 Ref. CL 10.14.1 ACI-318-11
Area of base plate resting on conc. Aplt = 1.11 m2
(Note:If Size & Area of base plate is not given then Aplt =0.25*p *[ (B.C.D+0.3)2- (B.C.D-0.3)2] is assumed to resist the load)
Factored maximum vertical load = P = 1.4*P(Max) = 89.6 kN Where,Pmax = Max (We,Wer,Wo,Wh)
Max. bearing pr. below base plate, p(max) =( P/Aplt ) = 0.080 N/mm2 OK, Concrete Safe in bearing
ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-
1206-00011

BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION PRE BY

Job No. WG0011
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 1
N004-V-47001 JKJ

Design of pedestal :
Maximum factored vertical load Fv,max = 1.4*Pmax 89.6 kN [ Pmax = Max(We,Wer,Wo,Wh) ]
Area of octagonal pedestal Aped = Ag 2.68 m2
Equivalent face of square Lp = Sqrt (Aped) = 1.64 m
Unsupported Length of the pedestal Lc = 2*(Df-Ts) 1.4 m [Unsupported L = 2.0*(Cantilever Length)]
Minimum lateral dimension Lp = 1.64 m (Considering equivalent square)
( Ref. Clause 22.8.2 of ACI-318M-11 ) Lc / Lp = 0.855 < 3.00 Pedestal
as Lc/Lp ratio < = 3.0, hence can be classified as ' PEDESTAL' as per Cl. 22.8.3.
Actual area reqd. for pedestal to support axial load Ag,reqd = 0.006 m2 < < Aped [ formula =Fv,max / (0.85*f*fc') ]
In case of vertical vessels, pedstal size is governed by the vessel dimensions.Pedstal sizes are significantly higher than reqd.

Check Pedestal (Structural Plain Concrete) :

1) Check-1: Stress at Tension and Compression face of pedestal (as per CL 22.5.3)
2) Check-2: Bearing Pressure beneath Base Plate at top of pedestal (as per CL 22.8.3)
If both of the above clauses are satisfied, then the pedestal requires only a minimum vertical reinforcement to transfer anchor bolt
tensile forces or, to match design capacity of anchor bolts ignoring the concrete and may be proportioned as per the ratio
of yeild stress of anchor bolt (fyb) to that of reinforcing bars (fst).

Check-1: Stress at Compression and Tension face ( Ref. Clause 22.5.3 of ACI-318M-11 ) (at the base of the pedestal)
Structural plain cement concrete members subjected to combined flexure and compression shall be proportioned as stated below:
On the Compression face :
after substituing the value for Pn and Mn, the equation reduces to as Equation-1:

(Equation-1)

On the Tension face :

which reduces to as equation-2 stated below:

(Equation-2)

fc' =Cylinder compressive strength of concrete 28 N/mm2

Lc = Length of compression member (c/c dist. of joints) 1.4 m (effective length =K*L, where , K = 2 for cantilever)
h =Equivalent Overall thickness of the member (Octagon) 1.64 m (Ref. CL.22.7.7 of ACI-318M-11 )
Sm =Appropriate elastic section modulus =0.1011*b13 0.59 m3 (The least elastic mod. of pedestal about diagonal)
A1 = Loaded Area (Annular base ring area) 1.11 m2
Ag = Gross area of pedestal =0.828*b1 2
2.683 m2

f =Reduction factor for flexure,comp.,shear and bearing 0.60 (Ref. CL. 9.3.5 of ACI-318M-11)
Calculation of the term, f Pn = 11227.7 kN

Calculation of the term, f Mn = 8419.7 kNm

Calculation of the term, = 1.333 N/mm2 (This is the max permissible tensile stress on Tension Face)

(All loads in the below mentioned table are at the base of the pedestal i.e. at the junction of pedestal and footing mat)
Load combinations Pu (kN) Mu(kNm) Weight of footing Mat, Wf = 27.39 kN
1.4*DL (Operating) 96.52 0.00 Weight of Soil above Mat, Ws = 7.36 kN
0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.6*WL 52.15 15.13 Weight of pedestal, Wp = 46.95 kN
0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.0*EL 52.15 8.48

0.9*DL(Erection) + 0.4*WL 52.15 7.20 Pu and Mu calculation for case: 0.9*DL(Empty)+1.3*WL(n)

1.2*DL(Operating) + 1.6*WL 82.73 15.13 Pu = P (Table-2) - 0.9*(Wf+Ws) = 83.4 - 0.9*(27.39+7.36) = 52.15 kN

1.2*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 82.73 8.48 Mu = M (Table-2) - 1.3*(Ve*Ts) = 16.3 - 1.3*(0.93) = 15.13 kNm

0.9*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 62.05 8.48

1.4*DL (Hydrotest) 155.32 0.00 "Table -2" refers to bearing capacity calculation table for factored load
1.2*DL (Hydrotest) + 0.80* WL 133.13 7.57
ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-
1206-00011

BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION PRE BY

Job No. WG0011
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 1
N004-V-47001 JKJ

R1 = R2 =
=
Load combinations Compression face of pedestal Tension face of pedestal
PU /fPn MU /fMn R1 Remark MU/Sm PU/Ag R2 Remark

N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2

1.4*DL (Operating) 0.009 0.0000 0.009 OK 0.000 0.036 -0.036 OK

0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.6*WL 0.005 0.0018 0.006 OK 0.026 0.019 0.006 OK

0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.0*EL 0.005 0.0010 0.006 OK 0.014 0.019 -0.005 OK

0.9*DL(Erection) + 0.4*WL 0.005 0.0009 0.006 OK 0.012 0.019 -0.007 OK

1.2*DL(Operating) + 1.6*WL 0.007 0.0018 0.009 OK 0.026 0.031 -0.005 OK

1.2*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 0.007 0.0010 0.008 OK 0.014 0.031 -0.016 OK

0.9*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 0.006 0.0010 0.007 OK 0.014 0.023 -0.009 OK

1.4*DL (Hydrotest) 0.014 0.0000 0.014 OK 0.000 0.058 -0.058 OK

1.2*DL (Hydrotest) + 0.80* WL 0.012 0.0009 0.013 OK 0.013 0.050 -0.037 OK

Max = 0.014 Max = 0.006 N/mm2

(Permissible =1.33 N/mm2)
Clause 22.5.3 is satisfied on tension and compression face
Check-2: Bearing Pressure beneath base plate ( Ref. Clause 22.8.3 & 22.5.5 of ACI-318M-11 ) (at the top of the pedestal)
(All loads in the below mentioned table are at the top of the pedestal )
Load combinations P P/Abp Remark
(kN) (N/mm2) (N/mm2) Vessel load at top of pedestal:
1.4*DL (Operating) 30.8 0.028 14.28 OK We = 11 kN
0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.6*WL 9.9 0.009 14.28 OK Wer = 11 kN
0.9*DL(Empty) + 1.0*EL 9.9 0.009 14.28 OK Wo = 22 kN
0.9*DL(Erection) + 0.4*WL 9.9 0.009 14.28 OK Wh = 64 kN
1.2*DL(Operating) + 1.6*WL 26.4 0.024 14.28 OK

1.2*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 26.4 0.024 14.28 OK

0.9*DL(Operating)+ 1.0*EL 19.8 0.018 14.28 OK

1.4*DL (Hydrotest) 89.6 0.080 14.28 OK

1.2*DL (Hydrotest) + 0.80* WL 76.8 0.069 14.28 OK

Clause 22.8.3 is satisfied. Check the applicability of CL 22.5.3, CL 22.8.3 & CL 22.8.2 = Applicable

Reinforcement:
If all clauses (i.e CL 22.5.3, CL 22.5.5, CL 22.8.2 & CL 22.8.3) are satisfied then CASE-1 is applicable
CASE-1 : Minimum vertical reinforcement of pedestal to match design strength of Anchor bolt:
In this case, vertical bars of pedestal are provided to transfer Anchor bolt tensile forces from pedestal to footing slab and the
proportion of pedestal vertical bars shall be done to match the design strength of Anchor bolt, ignoring the concrete.
For proportioning of pedestal vertical reinforcement to match the design capacity of Anchor bolt in tension (ignoring the concrete)
the yeild strength of anchor bolt (fyb) is replaced by the yeild strength of rebars (fst).
Note:

If Case-1 is applicable then, detailing of reineforcement shall be done so as to ensure that, anchor bolt tensile forces are
getting transferred properly to the pedestal vertical rebars. Ref. clause appendix-D commentry, RD 5.2.9 of ACI318M-11

Total gross C/S area of Anchor bolts,Ab=Nab*(p/ 4 ) *Dab2 = 1809.6 mm2

Equivalent steel Area reqd. to that of Anchor bolt area , A1= 1077.1 mm2 where, A1 = (fyb/fst)*Ab
Area of rebar reqd. to match design strength (Nsa), A2 = 2600.0 mm2 where, A2 = Nab*(Nsa/futa)
Reinforcement C/S area = Maximum of ( A1, A2 ) = Ast1 2600.0 mm2 Note: If Ast1 < 0.18% of Ag , then (0.18%)*Ag
will be provided.
CASE-2 : Minimum reinforcement as per ACI-318
Area of steel required by CL 10.9.1 A3=(1%)*Ag,reqd = 62.7 mm2 Ref. CL 10.9.1 ACI-318M-11
Area of steel required by CL 10.8.4 A4 = (1%)*(1/2)*Ag= 13413.6 mm2 Ref. CL 10.8.4 ACI-318M-11
Reinforcement C/S area = Maximum of ( A3, A4 ) = Ast2 13413.6 mm2

Note: 0.18% of gross area of pedestal will be provided as Minimum vertical reinforcement as per general engineering practices.
Reinforcement to be provided for pedestal : Ast = 4828.9 mm2
ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES CONTRACT Doc. No 0014-9500-WGEL-D001-ISGP-U13000-CX-
1206-00011

BASRAH - HAMMAR PERMANENT EG DEHYDRATION PRE BY

Job No. WG0011
FACILITY VLN
DESIGN CALCULATION -FDN OF INST. AIR RECEIVER CHK BY
Rev No.: 1
N004-V-47001 JKJ

Design maximum axial load capacity fPn,max = 0.80*f*[ 0.85*fc'*(Ag-Asc)+Fst*Ast ] Ref. CL 10.3.6.2 ACI-318M-11
Concentric maximum design axial load fPn,max = 34196.2112 kN

Maximum Axial load on column Fmax = 155.3 kN OK

No of bars and spacing required Nd and Sp = 24 Nos @ 210.75 mm c/c

Clear spacing provided for reinforcing bars, Sp,clear = 191 mm
Check clear minimum spacing of reinf. Sp,min = 150 mm OK

Side Face Reinforcement :

Thickness for the slab provided, Ts = 300 mm
When overall thickness of base slab (Ts) is more than 900 mm skin reinf. needs to be provided. Ref. CL 10.6.7 of ACI-318M-11
As (Ts ) < 900 mm skin reinforcement not required.
The spacing of reinforcement closest to the tension face, s, shall not exceed :

Ref. EQ 10.6.4 of ACI-318M-11

Where, Cc = Least distance from the surface of the skin reinforcement to the side face. 75 mm
fs = Stress in reinf. closest to the tension face at service load and shall be
calculated on the unfactored moment. ACI-318-11M permits fs = (2/3)*fy 280 N/mm2 ( Ref. Cl 10.6.4 )
s = Spacing of skin/side face reinforcement closest to the tension face N.A
sMAX = Maximum spacing of skin/side face reinforcement closest to the tension face N.A

Hence, Skin Renforcement not required by design.

Calculation of Tie (stirrup) :

For vertical vessel pedestal, ties are not generally required to resist the lateral shear as concrete alone is sufficient resist the shear,
rather lateral ties are provided to hold main vertical rebars and keep them in place during casting. It is better practice to provide at least
3 to 4 tie bars @ closer spacing ( 75 mm c/c) at the top of pedestal to resist cracking at top.

Nominal Shear capacity of concrete alone: Ref. CL 11.2.1.1 of ACI-318-11

Equivalent side of octagonal pedestal = 1.638 m
Effective depth of pedestal along shear = 1.543 m
Max. factored shear force on pedestal = 4.9 kN (Refer Table-2 of bearing capacity calculation for factored load)

Design Shear capacity of concrete alone = 1705 kN OK > 4.944 kN

Minimum vertical spacing (Sv) check for stirrups : Ref. CL 7.10.5 of ACI-318-11
16 times the main bar dia ,Spt_1 = 320 mm
48 times the tie bar dia , Spt_2 = 480 mm
Least lateral dimension , Spt_3 = 1638 mm

Vertical spacing of stirrups prov., Sv = 150 mm OK < Maximum Spacing

Note: In addition to the spacing criteria mentioned above, detailing shall conform to requirements of ACI-318M-11, Clause 7.10
Vertical Vessel foundation Check List: (For internal use, need not to be produced)

User should try to size the foundation pier/column such that , Height(Lc) / Width(Lp) < = 3.0 is satisfied. For column with Lc/Lp > 3.00, this program is not valid, it
1) needes to be designed for actual compression (P) and Bending (M)
This spreadsheet will not allow the footing slab base to lose contact more than 50% of the base area, so when tension develops, it is ensured that at least 50% of base is
2) in contact with soil.
3) The input (cells marked with yellow color) of this spreadsheet are to be cheked by the respective user to meet project specification
4) Development Length (Ldh) can be checked internally and detailing shall satisfy the requirement of development length of footing

If data for base plate not provided, Bearing Stress on concrete is calculated assumed the vessel base plate to be annular and of outer dia = B.C.D+0.3m and inner dia
5) =B.C.D-0.3m, If this assumption does not hold good then bearing stress can be calculated as per actual base plate shape and size
6) Pedestal vertical reinforcement arrangement shall ensure that all tensile force of anchor bolts get transferred to concrete pedestal to footing Slab/Mat
7) Maximum e/df ratio under Factored load combination shall be based on engineering judgement. For Unfactored load it shall be restricted to 0.30