Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The findings in this paper are the lesson plan and the sample of material
used to support the teaching and learning activity. The lesson plan and also the
material consisted in it were then analyzed based on the Ministry of National
Education Regulation Number 22 Year 2016 about Standard of Process. The
content analysis supported by documentary study was employed to find out the
objective of study. The results from the content analysis and document were
described in the forms of words and descriptions. The findings were then
portrayed under these following topics.
Identity of Learning
In this part, the lesson plan has mentioned the five points of identity of
learning. Those are the school name, subject matters, the grade/semester, the
materials, and time allocation. The school name is SMK Negeri 1 Udanawu, the
subject matter is English, the grade/semester is X grade semester 1, the material is
announcement, and the time allocation is two hours for three meetings. Moreover,
the teacher also mentioned the major and the academic year. The finding shows
that the teacher is able to put the identity of learning in order. However, the
finding also shows an interesting thing related to ESP teaching in which the lesson
plan is designed by the teacher for all majors. Moreover, the academic year that is
stated is 2017-2018, it means that the teacher is still using the same lesson plan
from the previous academic year.
Core Competence
The teacher needs to put this aspect in the lesson plan developed as the
basis for the competences to be achieved by the students. Besides, some language
skills were integrated in the lesson plans developed and they were shown in the
activities planned. In this lesson plan, the teacher has clearly mentioned the core
competences which are the same as what are mentioned in the syllabus.
Basic Competence
The basic competences are clearly mentioned in the lesson plan in which
consisting of basic competence three about the focus on knowledge of
announcement text and basic competence four about the focus on skill as well as
in the same topic. Moreover, the formulation of the basic competences is also
relevant with the syllabus released by the Ministry of Education and Culture.
Instructional Objectives
The instructional objectives in this lesson plans are stated in seven points.
All of the instructional objectives have already mentioned the audience, behavior,
condition, and degree. However, it is not relevant with the indicators of
competency achievement in which only consist of six points. Furthermore, the
instructional objectives in this lesson plan have two conditions which are
“Dengan mengamati…” and “Selama proses pembelajaran”.
Materials
The materials mentioned in the lesson plan are not complete based on the
basic competence. In the lesson plan, the teacher only provides three example of
announcement texts. The teacher did not specify the social function, text structure,
language feature of the materials. Furthermore, the teacher also did not mention
the remedial and enrichment materials in the lesson plan.
Assessment
DISCUSSIONS
In accordance with the above findings, the lesson plan consisting of nine
aspects as well as the materials were discussed based on the component of a
lesson plan determined by Standard of Process of the Minister of National
Education Regulation No. 22 Year 2016, their quality and connection to the
appropriateness of the lesson plan with the 2013 Curriculum. Besides, some
plausible reasons, related theories and interpretations were also portrayed below:
Identity of Learning
The finding shows that in term of this aspect, the lesson plan has clearly
mentioned at least five components of identity of learning. However, there is a
case in the finding that might rise question. The case is that the lesson plan is
designed by the teacher for all majors in the Udanawu Vocational High School. It
means that no matter what the students major is, they will receive exactly the
same lessons. On of the questions that might suddenly come to the mind is that
“Do the practice really implement the idea of the teaching English as Specific
Purposes?”. Kennedy and Bolitho (1984) stated that the demand of ESP has often
come from groups of learners with no need of general English and wish to learn
English for particular reasons connected to their studies. In this case, the teacher
may argue that the students need to learn general English first. We think that all of
us will absolutely agree with that idea, but the problem here is that why the
students receive the same materials while they are in different majors. It will be
more suitable if the teacher designs the same materials but with different topics
regarding the students’ majors. Furthermore, the teacher is also still using the
same lesson plan from the previous academic year. It is very unrecommended
action for the teacher to take because the different students will need different
treatment as well as the different needs. Therefore, although they are in the same
grade, the teacher still needs to undergo need assessment before conducting the
teaching and learning activities.
Core Competence
Basic Competence
The basic competences mentioned in the lesson plan are in line with the
syllabus from the government. The focus on knowledge in basic competence three
is clearly mentioned by the use of operational verb “membedakan”. The basic
competence four in which also stated also mentioned the focus on skill by the use
of operational verbs “menangkap makna” and “menyusun”. From the use of the
operational verbs, it is obZavious that the teacher will focus on the listening and
writing skill.
Instructional Objectives
Brown (2001) stated that the objectives should contain what teacher wants
the students to accomplish at the end of the lesson. In contrast, the finding shows
that the teacher used two condition in the objectives. One of the conditions is
“Selama proses pembelajaran…”. This formulation of the objectives did not in
line with what the idea of the objectives as stated by Brown because the condition
is intended for the condition during the teaching and learning activity, not the
condition after the teaching and learning activity.
Materials
The teacher actually needs to mentioned the clear media, tool, and sources
in detail so that it will be easier to be understand. Wright (1989) stated several
principles to guide and ease teachers in selecting media. He stated that media
should be easily prepared or obtained, be easily used and operated in classroom
situation, be meaningful and authentic, and improve students’ language skills.
Thus, the use of media should fulfill three principles; practicality, appropriateness,
and effectiveness.
In this part, the teacher only mentioned the picture of announcement text
as the media, the tools like computer and projector, and the sources from the
internet, handouts, and book from the government. However, the teacher did not
mention it clearly while actually the teacher should write clear and appropriate
media and sources to support teaching and learning process. If the sources are
from books, the sources should be written with full citation that contains the
author, year, the title of the book, the city where it is published, and the publisher.
If the sources are from the internet, the link should also be provided. One of the
books that suitable for this topic is the book from the Ministry of Education. It is
the example of appropriate example of the citation. “Kementrian Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan. (2017). Buku Guru Bahasa Inggris SMA/MA/SMK/MAK Kelas X.
Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud”.
Assessment
There are at least two principles of assessment proposed by Cameron
(2001) to be employed in analyzing the aspect of assessment. First, the assessment
should be able to measure what is formulated in the objectives regarding what and
how well students should demonstrate certain action verbs. Second, the
assessment should be congruent with activities and using familiar activities from
their classroom experience. So, the assessment should be able to reflect and
evaluate specific ability in line with the formulated objectives and indicators.
However, the finding shows that the scoring rubric that is used to measure the
skill especially the speaking skill involves grammar as the variable. It does not
reflect and evaluate the specific ability that is formulated in the objectives and
indicators. It will be more appropriate if the teacher uses for example, fluency and
accuracy as the variable to measure the students’ achievement in terms of
speaking. Furthermore, the test of speaking in which the teacher will conduct is
actually not really appropriate with the basic competence itself. It is because the
teacher only conducts a pronunciation test in which asked the students to
pronounce some words while the material is the announcement texts.