Dizon v.

Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

Dizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.

VVDizon v. Court of Appeals,13 holds that all three

elements of consent, subject matter and consideration must be
present for a valid sale to exist; and that in a situation where
any of the elements is not present, �[t]there was no perfected
contract of sale,�14 and that �the absence of any of these essential
elements negates the existence of a perfected contract of sale,�15
rather than using the technical term �void.� In Manila Container
Corp. v. PNB,16 the Court held that absence of the concurrence
of all the essential elements, the giving of earnest money cannot
establish the existence of a perfected contract of sale.